Mr. Speaker, thank you very much for the opportunity to associate myself with the Statement made by the hon. Member, and in particular to congratulate him for bringing the plight of this august House and its hon. Members once again to the fore.
Mr. Speaker, first of all, it affords me the opportunity to repeat my call for the scrapping of the Ministry for Parlia-mentary Affairs as appropriately recommended by the African Peer Review Mechanisms (APRM) Report of the African Union and the New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD) that one of the institutions of governance, indeed, a critical institution is the Legislature.
Mr. Speaker, the Speaker of Parliament, in my view, as the third most important personality, is the Leader of this House. Whilst we may acknowledge the separation of Majority and the Minority, nomenclatures such as the Ministry for Parliamentary Affairs, which is the creation of the previous National Democratic Congress (NDC) Govern- ment, it should not be part of our new process of deepening democracy in this country.
But Mr. Speaker, I have a few concerns with some of the issues that the hon. Member raised. I believe strongly that hon. Members do appreciate the role of Members of Parliament. Quite apart from the process of law making which we are
primarily associated with, Mr. Speaker, we do have deliberative role. We do have an oversight responsibility of the Executive that we do always when we are examining the Budget and many other related issues.
But Mr. Speaker, I was even disappointed yesterday that we took another step in approving a loan to support Members of Parliament. My disappoint- ment stems from the ad hoc measures in ensuring that Members of Parliament are able to work. It ought to cease; for how long -- From the period 1992, 1993, 2001 till date, we have always resorted to ad hoc mechanism in dealing with issues that affect hon. Members.
Many of the previous Members of Parliament, those who are just out, our predecessor Parliamentarians as we know, are “struggling” because their conditions of service -- Mr. Speaker, if you would permit me to refer to article 71 (1) (a) of our Constitution which mandates the Executive, in particular, the President -- Mr. Speaker, with you indulgence, I want to refer to that particular article in my contribution to this issue. Mr. Speaker, I beg to quote:
“71. (1) The salaries and allowances payable, and the facilities, and privileges available, to --
(a) the Speaker and the Deputy Speakers and Members of Parliament.”
I emphasise just clause 1 (a) of that provision.
Mr. Speaker, for how long should Members of Parliament be going through every other year of an ad hoc measure to deal with a particular ill only for it to reoccur in another four years? We need to confront the issue head-on. If we are unable to do it on the basis of capacity, let us say so, but this perennial ad hoc mechanism -- we approve a loan, and the public because of their misunderstanding of the role of Members
of Parliament would bash us; they use all kinds of language to discuss Members of Parliament.
Mr. Speaker, I th ink that the constitutional provision under article 71 is mandatory and it is about time we gave particular meaning to our constitutional provisions as a way of strengthening Parliament. Mr. Speaker, if you look at this House, committee meetings are done most of the time at the lobby and in the quarters just around us. It is not any respectable forum at which hon. Members can critically examine Bills that are brought here.
Indeed I am surprised, Mr. Speaker, that the building just outside here, since the departure of your predecessor, Mr. Speaker, much has not been seen by way of execution of that wonderful project which was being earmarked for the purpose of ensuring that hon. Members had decent facilities, especially for the purpose of committee work.
Quite apart from that, even the work on the Job 600 is stagnated, we do know that the problem had been running over in the last decade or more and yet we were unable to fix it.
Whilst I congratulate the maker of
the Statement, I believe strongly that the role of the Member of Parliament is not in any doubt. Our dilemma is that we are torn between the national interest and serving partisan interest, as many of them, including the hon. Member, may do at times, and also the conflict of meeting the desires and requests of our constituents, who are also at the other level. But nonetheless, Mr. Speaker, I think what is important, as I associate myself with the Statement, is that we must begin to develop bipartisanship, that we should
begin to develop consensus so that we have both sides of the House cooperating in the national interest.
With these few comments, I would like to congratulate the maker of the Statement.