they were in the Minority. And that lesson, we got from them of preparing before the Budget is presented, is very good for democracy. We have noticed the Standing Order that the Hon Deputy Chief Whip of the Minority has - [Interruptions.] Sorry, I am sorry, you are not Deputy, you are Chief Whip - [Laughter] - Sorry.
We know that the Public Accounts Committee is mandated to examine the accounts and present the report. Then after that, the decision is left to the House. If the House decides that the Committee should follow up on the recommen-dations, so be it. If the House decides that we should set up another committee to do it, we will do so. If we want the Committee to compose itself into a sub- committee, we will do that.
But we realized that the workload of the Committee is that heavy and if you add some more to them, you break the neck of the Chairman. So we are proposing that we set up another committee but that is left to the House to decide. I still want us to try to balance the competing demands on our time.
We are calling for more time to be able to digest and debate the Budget and we are also calling for time for some other activities. We need to balance them and we are just proposing this balance for the House. That, yes, let us allow and take notice of the fact that some Members including some key Members may be absent on the first day but we know that they will catch up on the second and third days. Because if we shift it, we will be left with only Sunday and Monday and we will not have sufficient time for the resource persons to take us through the Budget. I am saying this from experience and I think that we should take more than two days.
I also think that, yes, we could consider not to start the debate on Tuesday, we could consider not to start it on Wednesday, we could start the debate on Thursday but rather allow members of the various committees to concentrate on the committee work while a representative body debates the principles and policies on the floor.
We could do that because we are left with barely one month and a few days and on that day after the presentation, we will be left with just one month and we will have to do justice to it. That is why I keep on reiterating the fact that we need to pass this Budget Bill as soon as possible so that we can start from next year, being part of the process of budgeting. I think that will help us.
The best practice as we all know is for the House to be given three months to consider and debate a budget and pass the Appropriation Bill. That is the best practice. Ours is in the middle, some countries use two weeks but we use mostly one month but that is not sufficient.
So Mr. Speaker, I just want to crave your indulgence and to plead with my Hon Colleagues to, in the meantime, accept the notice that we have given and the concerns that they have raised will be dealt with by the Business Committee at its next meeting and then we would bring the detailed programme for that week for consideration. But we have as many as over 300 Questions and we are program-ming not to give opportunity to Hon Members to ask Questions when the Budget is before us unless they are of such a nature that we are compelled to do justice and to allow Hon Members to raise them.
So we want more time for more Questions from many more Hon Members so that we can reduce the backlog of
Questions on the Agenda. We know there are more Questions coming but as at now, we have over 330.
So Mr. Speaker, this is the proposed Business and as I said, the details of the Budget Week would be given at the next Business Statement.