Debates of 26 Nov 2021

MR SPEAKER
PRAYERS 1:14 p.m.

Mr Speaker 1:14 p.m.
Yes, Hon Deputy
Minority Whip?
Deputy Minority Whip (Mr
Ahmed Ibrahim): Mr Speaker,
you have just offered prayers, and I
know you would follow the Order
Paper for us to do Business.
Unfortunately, I can see the Hon
Leader of Government Business,
the Majority front bench, and the
entire Members of the Majority
absent from the Chamber. We had a
meeting with them this morning. Mr
Speaker, they are present within the
precinct of Parliament. The
Leadership of the Minority and our
137 Hon Members are all here. The
Hon Leader of Government
Business who has to lead
Government Business is not in the
Chamber.
Mr Speaker, I have gone to
check the attendance list. Hon Dan
Botwe was here, and Hon Philip
Basoah has signed, but I do not
know why they will come to sign
and leave the Chamber. Mr
Speaker, I just want to seek your
guidance. I saw and heard the Hon
Majority Chief Whip, Hon Frank
Annoh-Dompreh, addressing the
press saying that we in the Minority
are doing propaganda with the
Budget Statement.
Mr Speaker, the duty of a
Government Chief Whip is to make
sure that Government Business
goes through. Mr Speaker, the
Budget Statement is not a Private
Member's Motion. I saw Hon Members of the Majority this
morning. We had meetings together
in your presence so, why is it that
they are running away from their
own Budget Statement? [Hear!

Mr Speaker, in the history of this

country, it has never happened

before, that a Government brings its

Budget Statement, and runs away

from it. What are they afraid of? Mr

Speaker, should we alone go ahead

to pass the Budget Statement, then,

Ghanaians will say that it was the

Minority which passed it. Mr

Speaker, where are our Hon

Colleagues on the other Side? I

would want to seek your guidance.
Mr Speaker 1:14 p.m.
Hon Deputy
Minority Whip, please hold your
fire. I have just been informed that

the Majority Side would want to

have 30 minutes meeting of the

Caucus. They have alleged that I

was informed, but that definitely is

untrue. I was informed early in the

morning that both Caucuses had

meetings; that, I am aware of. We

just finished a meeting and straight

ahead -

I initially wanted the Hon First

Deputy Speaker to preside and he

left, but later on, he came back

because of the agitations of Hon

Members. Therefore, I decided that

I would preside, so I walked straight

from the meeting to my Lobby. I

asked whether Hon Members were

in the Chamber, and I was told yes.

Nobody came to inform me that

they were having a Caucus meeting.

That is why I came to preside only

to realise that there was nobody on

their Side. I would plead with you

for us to just suspend Sitting for 30

minutes.

Several Hon Members: No.
Mr Speaker 1:14 p.m.
Well, if you will
not take the plea, I have decided that
we will suspend Sitting for 30
minutes and then, we would now
come as a House, not half, to
conclude the debate on the
Government's Budget Statement and Economic Policy for the 2022
financial year. We would take the
decision today, so please -
What we need to do is to try to
activate what is usually referred to
as the usual channels of
communication. That seems to have
been blocked. Leadership would
have to activate the usual channels
of communication, and let us all
come on board and know when to
do this and when not to do it.
At this time, we would have to
give the Majority 30 minutes to
hold their Caucus meeting and then,
appear for us to conclude the debate
on the Budget Statement.
The House is accordingly
suspended for 30 minutes.
1.23 p.m. - Sitting suspended.
3.54 p.m. - Sitting resumed.
MR SPEAKER
Mr Speaker 1:14 p.m.
Hon Members,
please, I did suspend Sitting for 30
minutes -- [Interruption] -— would you please shut up! We cannot
allow indiscipline inside the House;
I am not prepared to tolerate it. I do
not benefit anything by being the
Speaker of Parliament. I am the
Speaker of Parliament to serve my
nation. It is not because I am going
to get anything better than I was
receiving. I will not tolerate that.
I am saying that the suspension
was for 30 minutes, but it has taken
us about two hours or more to

return. That is because the subject

matter that we are to discuss would

be new developments and they are

discussions that, as Speaker, I have

to be briefed. Your Leaders,

together with the Hon Minister for

Finance, came to brief me. Should I

have ignored them and come to

preside because I suspended Sitting

for 30 minutes? Go through the

media and see how I am being

insulted. Please, the only thing I

have is my reputation - [Pause] - I apologise for keeping you waiting,

and I would do that because there

was no communication to you, so

you are right to have taken the

position you have taken but please,

let us be Hon Members of

Parliament.

We are going to continue with

the debate on the 2022 Budget

Statement, and today is for your

Leaders to wind up. The Question

would be put and a decision would

be taken. I would start by giving the

opportunity to the Hon Minority

Leader to wind up the position

taken by the Minority, and after

that, the Hon Majority Leader will

do same. That was the decision

communicated to me yesterday.

Yes, Hon Minority Leader?

Majority Leader (Mr Osei

Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu) - rose -
Mr Speaker 1:14 p.m.
Hon Majority
Leader, is the Speaker out of order?
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:14 p.m.
Mr
Speaker, you certainly have not said
anything that puts you out of order
but when I entered, you were
relating to some events that
occurred when you suspended the
House. Mr Speaker, the Hon
Minister for Finance came with a
prayer during the periods when you
suspended the Sitting. The prayer
from the Hon Minister for Finance
is to the effect that in all the four
previous Budget Statements that he
had submitted to this House on
behalf of the President, he had
carried both Sides of the House with
him, and by that, the entirety of the
nation.
Mr Speaker, this fifth Budget
that was presented on behalf of the
President has, unfortunately,
created a situation where it appears
there is no consensus to approving
the Budget. That, by extension,
implied that he is not able to carry
the entirety of the nation with him
in this exercise. It is the reason he
came here and to you with his
humble prayer that he be accorded
some space for further engagement
with the extended Leadership of the
two Sides to enable him to build
bridges to see what takeaways that
he could make to affect this Budget.

Mr Speaker, the Hon Minister

for Finance himself is here; I would

not want to take the wind out of his

sail. The indication was that if we

allowed the Minority Leader to

speak to wind up, it may amount to

a crystallisation of the ideas

expressed by the Minority. And if I

do same, it would also amount to

crystallising the position of the

Majority, and I thought that before

we came here, we wanted to see if

we could engage to see if there are

matters that we could respond to in

order to carry the entirety of House

with him.

Mr Speaker, but as I said, he is

here and I would not pretend to

weep, as a sympathiser, more than

the bereaved; so if we can hear him,

and perhaps, we would make

progress after listening to him.

Mr Speaker, thank you.

Minority Leader (Mr Haruna

Iddrisu): Mr Speaker, I am aware

that you have met with the

Leadership and the Hon Minister

for Finance and an Hon Minister of

State to discuss further how these

matters relating to the approval of

the Budget would be done in a

manner serving the interest of our

country and our people. I would

suggest that I am heard to conclude

on the Budget. We heard the Hon

Minister for Finance on the 17th of

November, 2021, so we know what

his thoughts are. And he laid a

Paper before us; after he has heard

me, if he has interventions, we

would be happy to hear from him

before the Hon Majority Leader or

after the Majority has spoken, but

we have not been heard.

Mr Speaker, we serve the people

of Ghana; let them know where we

stand and why we stand there, and

why we think some policy actions

must be taken. So, fairly, if my Hon

Colleague has no objection, he

should allow me to proceed to

contribute to conclude on it, then he

or the Hon Minister for Finance

may want to respond to the issues

that are likely to be raised by us.

That is my thinking.
Mr Speaker 1:14 p.m.
Hon Majority
Leader, I thought with this one we
could go ahead and allow him to
state the position of the Minority. I
will then give the Minister for
Finance, being the one that came to
present the Budget Statement, to
say a few words, and then you will
come in as the final contributor on
the Budget and then, I can put the
Question.
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:14 p.m.
Mr
Speaker, as I indicated, the prayer
through you was to afford him
space to engage both the extended
Leadership of the Minority and
also, that of the Majority.

Mr Speaker, if the Minority

should speak - [Pause] -
Mr Speaker 4:04 p.m.
Hon Majority
Leader, I get the sense of the House,
that is why I said I would allow the
Hon Minority Leader to present
issues from his Side of the House:
the position they have taken. I
would give the Hon Minister the
opportunity to say a few words
before you would have your turn.
We need to hear the Hon Minority
Leader before we hear the Hon
Minister for Finance because the
Hon Minister presented the Budget
Statement and we have all heard it.
Let us finish with the response from
the Minority, then we would come
back - if the Hon Minister has something to add or subtract, he
would tell us. I would give you the
opportunity to conclude the debate,
then we can put the Question.
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:04 p.m.
Mr
Speaker, it would appear to me that,
maybe, you missed the import of
the application that I was making to
you. The Hon Minister, by his
prayer, is beseeching you to afford
him space to engage both Sides of
the House before the Hon Minority
Leader -[Interruption] - My little worry is that any time my Hon
Colleagues speak, we listen to them
in silence, but they have no patience
to listen to some of us and that is not
good enough. It does not help our
democracy. When they speak, they
expect the Majority to listen to them
in silence, but they never have the
patience to listen to the Majority.
How do they want to build
parliamentary democracy or is it the
case that they come with a stealth
determination that they would not
listen to anybody? Is that the case?
That cannot be good for us.
Mr Speaker, the Hon Minister's appeal to you is to allow him space
to engage further because, if upon
meeting the Leadership he has to
amend certain portions of his
presentation, it would render or cure
what the Hon Minority Leader
wants to put before this House. That
was why I said if it would be
possible, but if it would not be
possible at this stage and you would
want to listen to the Hon Minority
Leader before you listen to the
prayer of the Hon Minister, it would
mean that I would have to hold my
concluding remarks in abeyance for
him to do the engagement, and after
that, I give my remarks. The
sequence would not flow; that is the
reason I have come back to this
appeal. The chronology of events
then would be better instead of
listening to the Hon Minority
Leader and then affording him

space to grant his prayer, so that he

could do the consultations, and then

after we come back, I come to state

my opinion. The sequence would

not flow. However, we are in your

hands.
Mr Speaker 4:04 p.m.
Hon Majority
Leader, the issue is not one of
sequence. We have listened to
individual Hon Members of the
Minority and we have also listened
to individual Hon Members of the
Majority. The Hon Leaders now
would articulate the position taken
by the various Caucuses, so what
the Hon Minority Leader would
state would be the position of the
Minority and so we would have
heard their response to the Budget
Statement of the Hon Minister for
Finance. Then, he could bring his
prayer and you would also state
yours after you have listened to his
prayer and listened to your Hon
Members, the position that you
have taken. My work is simply to
put the Question and then we vote.
Hon Minority Leader, you have
the opportunity now to put before
the House and the country the
positon of the Minority.
MOTIONS 4:04 p.m.

  • [Continuation of Debate from 25/11/21]
  • Minister's debt numbers 4:44 p.m.
    “Ghana's debt is US$341,762.7 and US$58.3
    million as at the end of September,
    2021. He inherited a debt of 120
    billion from the John Mahama
    Administration and this means,
    cumulatively, in addition to a tax
    revenue of over 200 billion, he has
    borrowed over 220 billion and is
    still borrowing.
    Mr Speaker, so it is not
    surprising that our rating, whether
    by Fitch, Moody or Bloomberg,
    Ghana has been downgraded and
    our debt is unsustainable making us
    a high debt risk country. So, the
    Hon Minister, together with Dr
    Mahamudu Bawumia and the
    President, said they had superiority

    over management of responsible

    borrowing.

    The Terminal 3 which was built

    at the Kotoka International Airport

    by former President, John Mahama

    has already raked in some US$6

    million as returns to that

    investment. [Hear! Hear!]. That is

    prudent investment which was not

    put on the Consolidated Fund nor

    on the national debt of Ghana. This

    was airport taxes for the purposes of

    amortisation which was meant to

    deal with debts.

    Mr Speaker, yet we were told

    that NDC ‘opepepeepe' to wit, billions of money and so today,

    what figure would you give to

    them? [Interruption]. What name

    are we to give to this particular

    issue?

    Respectfully, Mr Speaker, may

    we turn to page 104 that this Side of

    the House wants to stand tall and

    strong and that we would not

    support the President Nana Addo

    Dankwa Akufo-Addo to bring back

    to this august House, and to the

    people of Ghana, that baby called

    ‘Agyapa' to wit, ‘good father'. It would not be accepted because it is

    Mr Speaker, I would lead reason

    on why we should not support

    ‘Agyapa'. Yes, the NDC started collateralising and securitising the

    Road Fund and what has that led us

    to? Road contractors are not being

    paid, certificates are held for three

    to four years without an

    unacceptable interest regime and

    many of such businesses are

    collapsing and they want to

    collateralise our mineral resources?

    We say no and would simply not

    accept it.

    An amount of US$1.5 billion

    has been collateralised against the

    Ghana Education Trust Fund

    (GETFund) and what is worse is

    that even when we have an Hon

    Minister as well as a governing

    Board, they create another vehicle

    called ‘Daakye' to wit ‘Future. Today, if the GETFund rakes in

    GH₵1.4 billion as they should do, because of VAT, GH₵680 million of it is used to service debts. So, in

    about two to three years, the

    GETFund may as well only be

    taking the VAT to service debts and

    not to complement infrastructure or

    the purchase of teaching and

    learning materials.

    Mr Speaker, I was one of the

    principal architects with former

    Hon Minister, Seth Terkper and the

    Hon Ato Forson to help expand

    exports. The Ghana EXIM Bank is

    the only bank that has a legitimate

    reliable source of revenue because

    we said a certain CIF value of 0.50

    per cent of imports is dedicated to

    the Ghana EXIM Bank.

    [Interruption] - I am not disputing that but they have borrowed against

    that one [Laughter].

    They have taken a U$100

    million Swiss facility against the

    Ghana EXIM Bank and I call on the

    Hon Minister for Finance to take

    immediate steps to investigate the

    manner in which the moneys are

    being given. They want to develop

    a new culture of entrepreneurs and

    that new culture should not know

    NDC nor NPP businesses. It should

    know Ghanaian businesses which

    can do well genuinely and which

    should legitimately be supported to

    grow this economy not the doll out

    to political favourites. [Hear!

    Hear!]. I will share a list which

    would surprise you - someone got GH₵16 million to farm; whether he or she is a farmer or not, I am on it

    - [Uproar] - [Laughter].

    Mr Speaker, the Hon Minister

    for Finance must not only respect

    just the Supreme Court ruling on the

    District Assemblies' Common Fund (DACF) but article 252 of the

    1992 Constitution which requires

    him to transfer money in quarterly

    instalments, not half year, next year

    or hope against January. The

    Constitution in article 252 says that

    quarterly instalments. Today, there

    are outstanding transfers for 2018,

    2019, 2020 and even 2021

    amounting to about GH₵2.6 billion, yet they say that they have done

    well and that the economy is doing

    well even though they cannot even

    meet their statutory obligations. Mr

    Speaker, it is not just with the

    District Assemblies' Common Fund, but the National Health

    Insurance Fund is in coma and it is

    surviving on a bond. What has

    happened to their dedicated two and

    half per cent VAT? What has

    happened to the two and half per

    cent VAT on the Ghana

    Infrastructure Investment Fund that

    they took as additional revenue?

    Mr Speaker, for instance, we are

    told that in 2017, the Government

    collected GH₵178,528,000 from COCOBOD as export duty but

    failed to disclose same. They should

    read the Auditor-General's Financial Statement of 2017/2018.

    Mr Speaker, somebody must be

    accountable for this borrowing from

    COCOBOD.

    Mr Speaker, on other issues, the

    district assemblies must function

    and we have all learnt our lessons

    following the appointment and

    confirmation of the MMDCEs and

    we saw how our Hon Colleague,

    Hon Basoah, was humiliated

    because of the confirmation of a

    DCE. Mr Speaker, very soon I

    would stand in his place to raise the

    matter of contempt of an Hon

    Member of Parliament on those

    parading our security agencies

    because they must have respect for

    him and allow him to perform his

    Mr Speaker, again, we are told

    that the Hon Minister for Finance

    spent GH₵23 billion on financial sector bailouts, yet he is talking

    about a development bank and he is

    dedicating about US$800 million to

    US$1 billion to this development

    bank. Could he not have used that to

    improve the liquidity of

    Agricultural Development Bank

    (ADB) and National Investment

    Bank (NIB) that are struggling

    instead of wanting to create a new

    financial institution? Mr Speaker

    what is even more important about

    the development bank is that if there

    is any bank in Ghana that

    Parliament must legislate on, then it

    is the development bank.

    Mr Speaker, it is because of their

    experience of the collapse of banks

    and micro loans and savings

    companies and the consequent

    attendance of unemployment and

    distress that it has created for

    families. This is why we must

    particularly legislate to iron out the

    mandate of this bank so that when

    there are infractions, we can punish

    them. Mr Speaker, if they dedicate

    about US$800 million to US$1

    billion - Mr Speaker, even the Hon Minister did not make full

    disclosures on this in the relevant

    paragraph because when I add up

    the figures, I do not get US$800

    million. Concerning the

    development bank, we need to be

    told what we should expect, apart

    from legislation. Mr Speaker, the

    Hon Minister talks about US$1

    billion but we need to know where

    the money is coming from and for

    what purposes. The Hon Minister

    cannot appropriate this by himself

    because in my view that would be

    wrong. Mr Speaker, he cannot

    appropriate about US$1 billion to a

    financial institution without

    parliamentary appropriation.

    Mr Speaker, krom aye hye to wit

    ‘the heat is on'. Those of us on this Side are also told of the review of

    fees and charges and I beg to refer

    to paragraphs 247 and 304

    respectively where the Hon

    Minister said that “Government will review fees and charges of MDAs

    for implementation from 1st

    January, 2022.” Mr Speaker, at least we are hopeful that he would come

    to Parliament with regard to this and

    do the needful, but over 29,000

    entities would be affected. Mr

    Speaker, he can do 15 per cent

    subject to parliamentary approval

    but not by his decision of automatic

    review of 15 per cent every other

    year. I believe that this is not good

    enough.

    Mr Speaker, again, the Hon

    Minister in presenting the Budget

    Statement on behalf of President

    Akufo-Addo told us of major policy

    shifts. Mr Speaker, this

    Administration accused the NDC

    Administration for going to the IMF

    - policy credibility. Mr Speaker, but they are suffering from policy

    psychosis as Hon Ato Forson said.

    Mr Speaker, where are they going

    to get the 100 billion for the

    Obaatanpa Cares Programme from?

    Also, they said that 2.5 billion

    would be made available for

    Ghanaian banks to borrow from but

    this has not happened and it was in

    their 2021 Mid-Year Budget

    Review. They said that the

    Obantaapa Cares Programme

    would replace the infrastructure for

    poverty alleviation. They are being

    smart so that Hon Members would

    not ask for the US$1 million dollar

    per constituency which ended up in

    the building of toilets and digging

    Mr Speaker, for instance, Hon

    K. T. Hammond should have

    received about US$6 million by

    now. Has he received any?

    Mr Speaker, with regard to the E-

    Levy, what then happens to the

    Communication Service Tax? What

    happens to the Unemployment

    Insurance? What happens to the

    GH₵100 million Fund for Labour

    and Faith-based Organisations for

    Retraining and Skills

    Development? What happens a year

    on to the increase in the

    Coronavirus Alleviation

    Programme Business Support

    Scheme (CAPBuSS) by US$150

    million? Mr Speaker, all of these

    are deceptions because nothing

    happened, the 2 billion has not been

    approved and we can refer to a

    paragraph in the Budget Statement.

    Also, they spoke about Agenda

    111, we would demand

    transparency on this including how

    the contracts were awarded. I heard

    the Hon Chairman of the Finance

    Committee talk about sole sourcing.

    Mr Speaker, sole sourcing must be

    used sparingly and rarely and

    should not be a rule of thumb. Mr

    Speaker, they should come clear on

    how the contracts were awarded

    and whether there was value for

    money. We need to know the

    location of these hospitals and what

    informed the allocations.

    Mr Speaker, statutory payments

    are suffering; the GETFund,

    National Health Insurance Fund,

    Common Fund - kurom aye hye. [Laughter] Mr Speaker, when you

    met Togbe Afede, the President of

    Asogli State, - I am saying this for

    the Hon Minister to take an interest

    and work with the Hon Minister for

    Lands and Natural Resources and

    the Hon Minister for Works and

    Housing in the best interest of the

    Ghanaian public - he complained to you about the wanton dissipation of

    public lands in Ho and other parts of

    the country without recourse or

    respect to the traditional rulers and

    traditional authorities. Mr Speaker,

    it is worth looking into and must be

    examined to protect these assets for

    the people of Ghana and the future

    of our country.

    Mr Speaker, they talk about

    growth, the highest growth of this

    economy happened under President

    J. E. A Mills and it was 11.4 per

    cent. Mr Speaker, there was

    negative growth in 2020 which was

    attributable to COVID-19.

    In concluding, as I have said

    total expenditure including arrears

    is projected at 137.5 billion

    representing 27.4 per cent of GDP.

    The key drivers of expenditure

    growth include capital expenditure,

    flagship programmes, wage bill and

    interest payments. Mr Speaker, I

    would like to share with you and for

    the purpose of the record why the

    debt of Ghana is on an

    unsustainable path. Under the NPP

    in 2016, interest payments was

    GH₵10.7 billion, in 2017 it was GH₵13.5 billion, in 2018 it was GH₵15.8 billion, in 2020 it was GH₵24.5 billion and in 2021 it is GH₵32 billion. In 2022 it is projected to be GH₵37.4 billion.

    Mr Speaker, even ESLA has

    also been collateralised - [Laughter] - I did not say Ursula. I said ESLA - Energy Sector Levies- [Laughter] - Hon Minister for Communications and

    Digitalisation, I am not referring to

    you. I am referring to that tax

    instrument that the NDC and

    President Mahama introduced that

    you described and called nuisance.

    Mr Speaker, today, we know

    how much ESLA is contributing to

    the management and effort at fiscal

    consolidation but what is worrying

    is that even that has been

    collateralised. So it means that a

    law which had a sunset clause for

    five years has now been extended

    upwards to nine years. That is the

    very reason we would not support

    Agyapa. This is because evidence

    suggests that many of these

    securitisation have not served our

    people right. Mineral resources

    contributing about 4 per cent to our

    gross national product in terms of

    tax revenue - very significant.

    So, Mr Speaker, in concluding, I

    can only agree with Dr Mahamudu

    Bawumia on 31st August, 2020

    when he said “do not tax momo”. His argument is that it affects the

    ordinary poor people. He is right

    and I share his thoughts on this

    particular matter. So the Hon

    Minister for Finance would

    probably consider withdrawing it.

    Mr Speaker, let me conclude

    with some evidence - when we look at remittances, they want to tax it;

    they want to tax bank charges.

    Inward remittances alone would

    reach about 3.6 billion, equivalent

    to 2.5 per cent of GDP and they

    want to subject it to a tax? That is

    why I said that it is not a prudent

    thing to do.

    So, Mr Speaker, the Hon

    Minister for Finance presented his

    Budget Statement - let me conclude

    with those highlights that E-levy - GH₵6.7 billion added to their fiscal deficit. They can proceed with the

    other policy principles of the

    Budget minus the E-levy. The Hon

    Minister should improve the

    construction of the paragraph on

    Agyapa; improve the construction

    of the paragraph on fees and

    charges limiting them to his

    mandate as the Minister for Finance

    and not attempt in any effort to

    usurp the mandate of Parliament

    under article 174 of the 1992

    Constitution. Fees and charges - Ghanaians are suffering.

    Finally, Mr Speaker, they said

    YouStart would take over from

    NABCo. It is in the paragraph. They

    should let the opportunities benefit

    every other Ghanaian. The other

    day, Hon Alhassan Suhuyini Sayibu

    asked the Minister for Youth and

    Sports about Astroturfs in Ghana.

    The location and distribution should

    be looked at. It is one-sided and

    they said they are developing

    Ghana for Ghanaians and

    developing the youth of Ghana

    when a particular section of the

    Ghanaian population is denied.

    Mr Speaker, One District, One

    Factory (1D1F) - look at the statement by the Hon Minister.

    Upper West Region has less than

    10, Upper East Region has less than

    10. Greater Accra Region has 76.

    One District, One Factory - there are many districts in the Upper East

    Region and the Upper West Region.

    We should begin to make a careful

    study. I particularly think that we

    should dedicate the development of

    cashew and poultry to the Bono,

    Bono East and Ahafo regions as it

    was standing and identify

    entrepreneurs in that area;

    encourage and support them to do it

    as their 1D1F but not the

    distribution they are doing and

    concentrating on the Greater Accra

    Region.

    Mr Speaker, in this Budget

    Statement, we are told that even

    though 1D1F has happened, we

    cannot trace how that has

    contributed to addressing

    unemployment; neither can we

    trace how that has contributed to

    growth. That is why it is welcoming

    when he said that there would be a

    tax exemption regime.

    So, Mr Speaker, you requested

    for budget of GH₵1.7 billion for Parliament. Realistically, I think

    that that is on the high side but

    Parliament deserves to be

    adequately funded. Mr Speaker, I

    know your quest is to allow for 2

    per cent of GDP to go to the other

    coequal organs of State. So if the

    compensation of Parliament is 350

    million; CAPEX, GH₵350 million; goods and services, GH₵300

    million; that gives us GH₵1 billion. But the Hon Minister for Finance

    has only allocated GH₵510 million for Parliament which is woefully

    inadequate. It is part of the reasons

    we think that this his Budget should

    not be endorsed and we would not

    So, Mr Speaker, on this “do not tax momo” punishing the same known tax payers again who use

    mobile money accounts. It is a

    blanket tax on everything

    electronic; from taxing a person

    who has already paid tax on his

    income to moving that same money

    from one account to the other when

    there is no spending except bank

    charges to pay for credit - what has happened to CST?

    So, Mr Speaker, as I told you

    yesterday I intend to invoke article

    104 of the 1992 Constitution. We

    on this Side want to stand united

    that we are against the introduction

    of E-levy on electronic payments

    and electronic transactions and we

    would not support this Budget if

    that is not withdrawn for revision

    and for further discussions with

    stakeholders. We would not.

    Mr Speaker, we must be assured

    that the people of Ketu South and

    many other areas who suffered the

    tidal waves would be accounted for

    in the Budget of the Ministry of

    Works and Housing.

    Mr Speaker, on this note, I can

    only thank you for the opportunity

    to contribute to the Motion and to

    urge my Side to stand united,

    collectively in rejecting this

    Budget.

    Thank you, Mr Speaker. [Hear!
    Some Hon Members 4:44 p.m.
    Do not
    tax MoMo!
    Mr Speaker 4:44 p.m.
    Hon Members, the
    Hon Minority Leader has used 42
    minutes, 7 seconds. We would now
    give the Hon Minister for Finance
    the opportunity after hearing the
    position of the Minority in response
    to his Budget Statement whether he
    has any prayer as indicated by the
    Hon Majority Leader. Then after
    that, I give the opportunity to the
    Majority Leader.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu - rose
    - 4:44 p.m.

    Mr Speaker 4:44 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Majority Leader?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:54 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I think this is the reason I
    indicated at the very outset that
    given the sequencing of events, if
    the Hon Minister for Finance's request would be acceded to, then
    the engagement could be halved
    before the two of us came in. Now
    that we have listened to the Hon
    Minority Leader crystallise the
    position of the Minority, I think it
    can only be fair if I came in with the
    position of the Majority.

    Then after, the Hon Finance

    Minister would come in with his

    prayer but to say that the Hon

    Minister for Finance should come

    in first, is the reason I cautioned that

    either you allowed the Minister to

    come in with his prayer first, or if

    you allowed the Minority Leader,

    then necessarily, I should after the

    Minority Leader - [Interruption] - The prayer is to the Speaker, and

    not to Hon Nii Lante Vanderpuye.
    Mr Speaker 4:54 p.m.
    Hon Members, the
    request of the Hon Majority Leader
    is for us to vary the sequence as
    initially indicated, by allowing him
    to also submit the position of the
    Majority. After that, we would
    listen to the prayer of the Hon
    Minister for Finance. I have no
    problem with that. We can listen to
    the Hon Majority Leader, then
    allow the Minister for Finance after
    that.
    Hon Majority Leader, it is your
    turn.

    Majority Leader (Mr Osei

    Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu): Mr

    Speaker, thank you very much for

    this opportunity to conclude the

    debate on the Budget Statement of

    the Government of Ghana for the

    2022 Financial Year.
    Mr Speaker 4:54 p.m.
    Hon Members,
    please may we listen to the Hon
    Majority Leader in silence.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 5:44 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I pray my Hon Colleagues
    to grant me space to make my
    contribution because of my physical
    constitution.
    Mr Speaker, I think it is
    important to relate to what we
    know. At the beginning of the Hon
    Minority Leader's contribution, he referred to a petition that he and I
    were to receive from the
    demonstrators under the auspices of
    Fix the Country, but we never
    received any petition when we went
    there. The leader said he would
    bring five more of their leadership
    to present the petition for onward
    relay to Mr Speaker. We gave them
    the opportunity, but when they
    retreated, there was confusion
    among themselves and they came
    back to indicate to us that they
    would rather accept 10 of them to
    present the petition to us. When we
    gave them the opportunity to come
    with 10 people, it ended up in
    confusion such that the petition they
    were holding was shredded into
    pieces. No petition was presented to
    us. That is why I am surprised that
    the Hon Minority Leader said that
    the petition was about the
    withdrawal of the E-Levy - [Interruption] - that was what he said. It then appeared to me that he
    was part of those who composed the
    petition that the people wanted to

    Mr Speaker, either than that, a

    petition that was not presented to us

    - he and I were to receive it together, but it never came to us. It

    was shredded into pieces and he

    came to Parliament to say that it

    was about E-Levy withdrawal. How

    did he know, Mr Octopus Paul?

    Mr Speaker, the Minority

    Leader said that krom aye hye. Se

    krom aye hyea enye ene na krom yee

    hye. To wit, things are hard in the

    country. If the things are hard, it did

    not start today. [Uproar!] They are

    telling us that krom aye hye because

    of the proposal to introduce new

    taxes. But are new taxes of today?

    Mr Speaker, in 2014, the NDC

    Administration introduced direct

    taxes. They increased the

    withholding tax rate on commercial

    rent from eight per cent to 15 per

    cent; they undertook transfer

    pricing audit to reduce transfer

    pricing abuse; they increased the

    withholding tax rate on

    management and technical service

    fees from 15 per cent to 20 per cent

    - [Hear! Hear!] - Hon Ato Forson, ene na kurom aye hye? They

    expanded the scope of capital gains

    tax to cover petroleum operations;

    they reintroduced the windfall tax

    bill here in Parliament; and they

    introduced the Special Import Levy.

    In direct taxes, 2.5 per cent

    increase in VAT rate to be allocated

    to infrastructure funds; they

    introduced Special Electronic Point

    of Sale Device Scheme; they

    introduced tax stamps on selected

    excisable products, and they

    changed bases for petroleum excise

    for specific to ad valorem and they

    increased the Road Fund Levy from

    GH₵0.10 to GH₵1.00; 900 per cent increase overnight - [Uproar] - Ene na krom aye hye? People

    should be honest with themselves.

    Mr Speaker, in 2015, they

    introduced direct taxes. They

    increased the minimum income tax

    rate for Free Zones Entities from 8

    per cent to 15 per cent; there was

    extension of 5 per cent National

    Fiscal Stabilisation Levy, they

    increased the withholding tax rate

    on director's remuneration from 10 per cent to 20 per cent; they

    increased Excise Duty on tobacco

    from 150 per cent to 175 per cent -

    [Uproar] - Ene na krom aye hye? There was reversal of Excise on

    petroleum from ad valorem to

    specific with the intention of

    maximising tax revenue from

    petroleum products regardless of

    shocks from the global

    environment. The VAT for free

    base financial service was also

    introduced, 5 per cent VAT on

    commercial real estate was

    introduced. Ene na kurom aye hye?

    - Dr Ato Forson was the Deputy

    Finance Minister?

    Mr Speaker, in 2015, they

    extended Special Import Levy from

    1 per cent to 2 per cent. With

    indirect taxes, they introduced 5 per

    cent flat rate on real estates; they

    amended the National Health

    Insurance Act to fully align the

    schedules to the VAT Act of 2013

    (Act 870). They then abolished

    VAT relief purchase order in

    granting of tax relieves in 2015.

    They imposed Special Petroleum

    Tax of 17.5 per cent for the people

    in 2015.

    What is being done now for

    foreigners? Mr Speaker, people

    should be honest to themselves.

    Mr Speaker, they continued with

    the enforcement of 1 per cent to 2

    per cent Special Import Levy.

    Mr Speaker, the National

    Democratic Congress' (NDC) Administration continued the

    enforcement of the one to two per

    cent Special Import Levy up to the

    year 2017, that is just before they

    left office, and they introduced

    taxes on cutlasses and machetes.

    They introduced taxes on condoms

    to aid in family planning and to

    prevent the Acquired Immuno

    Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)

    disease, which was going to impact

    on our health financing. Ene na

    kurom aye hye, me boa? To wit, “Is it today that things are hard in the

    country?”

    Mr Speaker, in the year 2016,

    they implemented the Income Tax

    Act, the full rollout of Excise Tax

    Stamp Project. The maximum tax

    rate for free zones was increased

    from eight to 25 per cent in 2016.

    Also, they implemented measures

    they said were going to address

    revenue leakages, but ended up

    imposing additional taxes.

    Mr Speaker, then there was the

    re-imposition of excise duty on

    cider beer, and I know Hon Ato

    Forson is a fan of cider beer. They

    then reviewed income tax and

    threshold VAT, all in the year 2016.

    I would want to ask the Hon

    Adongo: ene na kurom aye hye me

    boa? Thou shall not bear false

    Mr Speaker, in the 2017 Budget

    Statement, we abolished the one per

    cent Special Import Levy that they

    introduced. We abolished the 17 per

    cent VAT NHIL on financial

    services, and that is under the

    Akufo-Addo's Administration. We abolished the 17.5 per cent VAT

    NHIL on selected imported

    medicines that are not produced

    locally, and that was under the

    Akufo-Addo's Administration. We initiated steps to remove import

    duties on raw materials and

    machinery for production within the

    context of the Economic

    Community of West African States

    (ECOWAS) Common External

    Tariff Protocol, and these were

    done under the Akufo-Addo's Administration, but at the time of

    the NDC Administration, they

    existed.

    Mr Speaker, we also abolished

    the 17 per cent VAT NHIL on

    domestic airline tickets; the five per

    cent VAT NHIL on real estate

    savings; excise duty on petroleum;

    and reduced special petroleum tax

    rate from 17 per cent to 15 per cent.

    We also abolished duty on the

    importation of spare parts; levies

    imposed on Kayayei by local

    authorities; levies imposed on

    religious institutions by local

    authorities; exempted from taking

    taxation, the gains from the

    realisation of securities listed on the

    Ghana Stock Exchange publicly

    held securities approved by the

    Securities and Exchange

    Commission. We then reduced the

    National Electrification Scheme

    Levy from 5 per cent to 3 per cent.

    Mr Speaker, we replaced the

    17.5 per cent VAT NHIL rate with

    a flat rate of three per cent for

    traders and we implemented tax

    credits and other incentives for

    businesses that hire young

    graduates. These were the reliefs

    initiated and indeed, passed into law

    under the Akufo-Addo regime.

    [Hear! Hear!] I think that if we

    must be honest with ourselves, se

    krom aye hye a, it began in the era

    of the NDC Administration.

    Mr Speaker, on Friday as I said,

    the Minister came with the Budget

    Statement and he responded to the

    realities of 2016 after eight years of

    the NDC Administration. The

    Minister did not mince words

    because it is said that if one does not

    know where he comes from, he

    would not be able to make progress

    moving ahead, and it is the reason

    the Minister related to the situation

    that he met in 2016. He said, and I

    quote:

    “When we inherited office, the economy was in a very

    bad shape, suffocating

    under a mixed weight of

    debts, arrears, very high

    cost of living, high youth

    unemployment and the

    worst growth rates since

    1994, which is the worst

    growth rate in 26 years.”

    Mr Speaker, that was in 2016. If

    we went back, before the COVID-

    19 pandemic, the most shambolic

    Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

    growth rate was witnessed in 2014

    of 2.2 per cent. It was the worst

    GDP growth rate in 32 years, and

    that was under the former President

    Mahama, and they had courage to

    applaud that. This time around, the

    COVID-19 situation, as we all

    know, is unprecedented, and it has

    not only affected Ghana. The fact is

    that it was not due to

    mismanagement as happened. We

    all know the realities; the rising

    global inflation occasioned by the

    COVID-19 pandemic

    circumstances, disruption of supply

    chains, rising costs of shipment and

    the unstable financial markets,

    which is making borrowing high

    risk, and coming at high cost. These

    realities are known by our Hon

    Colleagues, but conveniently, they

    avoided these home truths, or is the

    case that anybody from amongst

    them would rise to challenge these

    home truths?

    Mr Speaker, these are some of

    the rampaging effects of COVID-19

    that we all do know, that families in

    Ghana lost loved ones, private

    school teachers lost income for 12

    months, business owners lost

    considerable income, and many

    thousands of hospitality and

    tourism sector workers were laid

    off. We all do know that Kempinski

    is the flagship hotel in this country.

    Before the COVID-19 pandemic,

    they employed 360 people, but in

    the COVID-19 year, they had lay

    off 300 of the 360 staff and retained

    only 60. That was the extent of the

    devastation of the COVID-19

    pandemic. So, for anybody to elect

    to gloss over these realities and

    come to criticise Government for

    mismanagement, the person is not

    owning up to himself or herself, or

    to the realities.

    Mr Speaker, we know that food

    security was even threatened. There

    was great slump in businesses,

    especially those built around

    traditional and other social events.

    Unemployment worsened, industry

    slumped, productivity generally

    downsized, and the economy got

    severely punched. My Hon

    Colleagues would admit to these

    hard facts, yet, as I said,

    conveniently, they elected not to

    proceed from this angle.

    Mr Speaker, in response to the

    battering of the economy,

    Government took measures to

    protect lives and property. Some

    amount of 4.78 million people were

    provided with hot meals. A number

    of 470, 000 families were given

    food packages; an amount of

    GH₵36.8 million in tax exemptions were granted to frontline staff; 10

    million households were provided

    with free water; 38,000 nurses were

    employed to offer critical support;

    4.78 million households were

    provided with free electricity; and

    11 million staff and students were

    supplied with Personal Protection

    Equipment (PPEs). All these came

    at a cost.

    Mr Speaker, not a single worker

    in the public sector lost their job,

    and all of them who worked in the

    public sector were paid their full

    remunerations at the end of each

    month. A number of 3,300

    beneficiaries received financial

    assistance from the Ghana

    Enterprises Agency (formerly

    NBSSI), amounting to over

    GH₵523 million. These are the hard realities of the COVID-19

    economic environment, and it is

    important to flash back to address

    our minds to the performance of the

    economy before the COVID-19

    pandemic descended on Ghana.

    Mr Speaker, growth in

    agriculture was declining under the

    watch of the NDC Administration

    in 2016. In that year, agriculture

    grew by 2.9 per cent, but by 2019, it

    had increased to 4.6 per cent. Crops

    grew at 2.2 per cent in 2016, and by

    2019, it had increased by 5.3 per

    cent. Cocoa, which grew at -7.0 per

    cent in 2016, by 2019 had grown at

    5.4 per cent.

    The growth in industry was

    abysmal in 2016 at 4.3 per cent.

    Under the New Patriotic Party

    (NPP), it grew to 15.7 per cent in

    2017; 10.6 per cent in 2018; and 6.4

    per cent in 2019. These are the hard

    realities of life and of our national

    development.

    Mr Speaker, mining and quarry

    that grew at only 0.2 per cent in

    2016, grew by 12.6 per cent in 2019

    before the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Oil and gas which grew at -15.6 per

    cent in 2016 -[Interruption]- has

    grown to 15.1 per cent in 2019.

    These are the hard realities. Mr

    Speaker, electricity under their

    watch grew at negative 5.8 per cent

    but by 2019, it had grown to 6.0 per

    cent. Water and Sewage grew at -

    11.8 per cent. Mr Speaker, these are

    the hard realities —[Interruption]-

    Mr Speaker, all the indices of

    economic growth under the NDC

    and President John Dramani

    Mahama and President Akufo-

    Addo, there is a world of difference.

    Inflation: the banking sector raised

    a 91-day Treasury Bills and fiscal

    deficits. They all attest to the better

    job the Akufo-Addo Administration

    has been doing, especially on the

    external front, with particular

    reference to trade deficits and gross

    international reserves.

    Mr Speaker, even today, in spite

    of the COVID-19, the gross

    international reserves accumulated

    under this Government is

    unprecedented in the history of this

    country. The other day, I heard my

    Hon Colleague, Hon Okudzeto

    Ablakwa refer to the ECOWAS

    Convergence Criteria. He should

    please check his facts. When we

    had 10 criteria; four primary and six

    secondary criteria, there was not an

    occasion that they scored five out of

    10 under Mills-Mahama

    Administration. The best was four

    out of 10 and when they

    synchronised under President

    Mahama, their best was two out of

    six. And they have the courage to

    talk about Convergence Criteria?

    The annus horribilis of this

    Government is last year and yet, we

    met three out of six of the criteria.

    So, our annus horribilis is better

    than their best performance. They

    should swallow the bitter pill and

    own up to truthfulness; Hon

    Adongo, truthfulness would not kill

    you -[Laughter] -

    Mr Speaker, there is something

    called truthfulness; we do not

    manufacture facts. Support for

    industry and entrepreneurship; 181

    companies at the beginning of 2020

    had benefited under the 1D1F. As

    of now, as the Minister recounted to

    us in July, this year, 106 of the

    factories have started production

    and 81 are still in the works. Again,

    surprisingly, we had a Member rise

    up to say that the figures that the

    Minister for Trade and Industry

    came to give were manufactured by

    him; they were all proposed

    employment opportunities and that

    by extension, nobody is benefiting

    from the rollout of the 1D1F. How

    insincere can we be on that?

    Mr Speaker, 20,000 students had

    by the beginning of 2020 been

    trained under the Student

    Entrepreneurship Initiative; 100

    physically challenged women have

    been empowered to start their own

    businesses; 19,500 start-up

    businesses have received training

    support under the Government

    Entrepreneurship Programme.

    Mr Speaker, IDEG Programmes

    — we do recollect that 307 ambulances to each Constituency

    and all regional and teaching

    hospitals were purchased; 200 dams

    have been completed and 560

    additional dams were under

    construction at the beginning of

    2020 before the advent of COVID-

    19.

    Mr Speaker, 50 pre-fabricated

    grey warehouses have been

    constructed by the end of 2019 to

    reduce post-harvest losses. And yet,

    people say that they do not see

    anything under the Akufo-Addo led

    Administration. Christ Jesus said in

    his parables that those who have

    eyes to see, let them see; those who

    have ears to hear, let them hear.

    Kwame, if you have eyes to see,

    you would see; if you have ears to

    hear, you would hear.

    Mr Speaker, clearly, the country

    was on the course of even greater

    achievements even in 2020

    predicated on one, the expanded

    domestic revenue mobilisation; the

    business regulatory reforms;

    intensified drive for foreign direct

    investments; enhanced financial

    support to local enterprises; the

    digitisation programme; the

    accelerated infrastructural

    development especially, roads,

    hospitals and educational facilities

    and science and technology drive.

    All these were being undertaken

    and then, from nowhere, we had the

    COVID-19 invasion.

    Mr Speaker, the COVID-19

    invasion in my view, can be likened

    to the force majeure that this

    country experienced in 1982/83 - the draught and the wild goose fires.

    It is not the self-inflicted dumsor-

    dumsor. And the growth out of this

    is phenomenal. It is important to

    come to grips with the impact of

    COVID-19 on ECOWAS country.

    The ECOWAS sub-region's average annual GDP growth in

    2020 was -2.5 per cent. Ghana

    thankfully, did not register a sub-

    zero growth. Ghana kept its head

    above water at the time the world

    economy came under recession.

    Only four countries in the sub-

    region did better than Ghana in

    2020. Nigeria registered negative

    4.3 per cent; Liberia registered

    negative 3.0 per cent; Sierra Leone

    registered negative 3.1 per cent; the

    Gambia registered negative 1.8 per

    cent; Cape Verde registered

    negative 6.8 per cent; Togo

    registered 0.0 per cent; Mali

    registered negative 2.0 per cent;

    Guinea Bissau registered negative

    2.9 per cent; Burkina Faso

    registered negative 2.2 per cent and

    Senegal registered 0.7 per cent. The

    countries that did better than Ghana

    are la Cote D'Ivoire negative 1.8

    per cent; Guinea registered 1.4 per

    cent; Benin registered 2 per cent

    and Niger registered 0.5 per cent.

    Mr Speaker, these countries did

    better than Ghana in the 16

    ECOWAS nations in the sub-region

    but none of these countries that did

    better than us went to the extent

    Ghana did to mitigate the impact of

    COVID-19 on the economy and on

    the people like providing hot meals.

    None of them did that. Mr Speaker,

    the uncooked meals that were

    provided; providing free water and

    electricity; providing business

    support as Ghana did; not one of

    them did that. That is why they were

    able to do better than Ghana. Speak

    the truth and it shall set you free.

    Mr Speaker, it is important to

    state that all these West African

    countries were registering in the

    region, real growth rate in the

    positive before the advent of the

    COVID-19. Whereas, Ghana grew

    by 6.5 per cent in 2019, la Cote

    D'Ivoire grew by 6.5 per cent; Senegal, 5.3 per cent; Guinea, 5.6

    per cent; Burkina Faso, 5.7 per cent;

    Benin, 6.9 per cent; Guinea Bissau,

    4.5 per cent; Mali, 5.1 per cent;

    Niger, 5.9 per cent; Togo, 5.3 per

    cent; Cape Verde, 5.7 per cent; The

    Gambia, 6.1 per cent; Sierra Leone,

    5.1 per cent; and Nigeria, 2.2 per

    cent.

    Mr Speaker, so, Ghana like all

    these, was on a very smooth

    trajectory until COVID-19 struck.

    That is what we must speak to and

    not just look into the air and

    manufacture or engage in

    conjectures. It would not help us. If

    we compare it to 2014, 2015 and

    2016, we would realise that the

    average growth rate in West Africa

    was 5 per cent and yet we grew by

    2.2 and 3.4 per cent in Ghana under

    their watch. They must do serious

    introspection to realise that their

    management of the economy was

    most abysmal and incompetent.

    Mr Speaker, until the COVID-

    19 pandemic, this Administration

    expanded the economy between 16

    and 17 per cent annually.

    Resultantly, revenue available to

    Government expanded that much.

    In 2020, the GDP was targeted to

    grow to about GH₵420 billion and for 2021, it was projected to expand

    further to GH₵450 billion. It shrunk because of the COVID-19

    pandemic. In that regard, if we

    expanded that much and borrowed,

    it meant that both the numerator and

    denominator expanded so the debt

    to GDP ratio was manageable. This

    is basic economics. The debt to

    GDP ratio did not increase that

    much at that time but when the

    COVID-19 pandemic struck the

    economy could not grow. On the

    contrary, expenditure escalated to

    provide for the effect of the forced

    majeure and this should mean that

    the country's debt to GDP would balloon as we are seeing because

    the denominator shrunk while the

    numerator expanded. That is the

    reason. However, people have

    talked about a comparison that

    when they existed, the total debt

    stock was GH₵120 billion but today, it is in the region of GH₵341 billion. That is so, but what they do

    not even relate to is that they

    inherited the total debt stock of

    GH₵9.6 billion. At the time they were leaving, it had climbed up to

    GH₵120 billion because when they came to power, the cedi to dollar

    exchange rate was GH₵1.1 to US$1 but when you string out according

    to the months and years, the total

    debt stock they added in dollar

    terms, was US$47 billion. They

    should check today - when we string out, it would be about US$33

    billion. They should not mislead

    Ghanaians. They should do it in

    nominal dollar terms and come to

    the reality. They could appeal to

    those people in the streets that,

    things have gone up - they should speak to the truth. The truth shall set

    Mr Speaker, when one listens to

    some of these things one wonders

    where some people come from;

    whether they come from Neptune or

    Jupiter. We are in Ghana so they

    should speak to the Ghanaian

    situation but they omit to speak to

    the truth and that is why they are

    able to pollute the environment.

    Some of my Hon Colleagues should

    be cited for environmental pollution

    because they pollute Ghanaians

    with half-baked truths. Let us come

    to the home truth. The Hon Member

    for Yepei/Kusawgu, Mr John

    Jinapor talked about climate

    change. He was the one who started

    the financial environment debate.

    Mr Speaker, the Government did

    not shy away from its responsibility

    and indeed, it has introduced

    strategic interventions because we

    know and yesterday, my Hon

    Colleague himself a former Hon

    Deputy Minister for Roads and

    Highways, talked about the fact that

    the last road audit in this country

    was done in 2016 so when we say

    that the current road network is in

    the good region of 78, 000 km, that

    78,000 km got yielded in 2016.

    How untrue could that be?

    Mr Speaker, when we conduct

    population census, we do so every

    10 years and there is a scientific

    basis to project the year or two after

    the census until we have another

    census. They are all based on

    projections. Yes, it is true that what

    was done was done in 2016. What

    came out was that it was 73,000 km

    and the former Hon Minister from

    their Side was in this House to

    admit to it. Why do they want to

    manufacture figures?

    Mr Speaker, it is true that since

    independence till the former

    President Kufuor's time, the total road network was 39,000 km. It was

    the former President who increased

    it from 39,000 km to 69,000 km.

    The truth of the matter is that there

    was no 30,000 km newly

    constructed roads. There were a lot

    of feeder roads that were not in the

    system that were brought into

    mainstream for purposes of

    maintenance. That was how come

    the road network increased from

    39,000 km to 69,000 km. When the

    NDC assumed power, they

    increased the road network from

    69,000 km to 73,000 km, an

    addition of 4,000 km. What it meant

    was that on yearly bases they

    increased by 500 km and that is

    commendable. Today, under the

    Akufo-Addo led Administration, it

    has grown from 73, 000 km to

    almost 79,000 km and that was

    what the Hon Chairman of the

    Committee alluded to.

    Mr Speaker, what this means is

    that within a space of 20 years, the

    total road network has doubled. We

    need to maintain and service them.

    It is this extraordinary ballooning of

    the road network which has caused

    the current state of affairs where

    every Friday, Hon Members come

    in to request the status of road

    construction in their constituencies.

    We need to maintain and complete

    those that we have started. We must

    admit that there are a lot of arrears

    to road contractors. This is because

    of what has happened within 20

    years; the doubling of the roads.

    Some of the roads are in Asawase,

    Suame, Tamale Central, et cetera.

    We must admit to the reality. We

    need money to develop these roads.

    This is one of the reasons the

    Ministry is introducing the E-levy.

    Mr Speaker, Hon Colleagues

    have spoken to the ballooning of the

    public debt and they have indicated

    for the past two years that the

    Government must be ingenious and

    look within to mobilise resources.

    Today, the Government has come

    with the E-levy and they want to

    change the goal post to say that we

    should not go that way.

    [Interruption] - Did I hear the Hon Member for Bolgatanga Central,

    Mr Adongo say that we should go

    and farm?

    Mr Speaker, so we have seen

    what mountain we have to climb, as

    a nation. Their people need roads,

    water, electricity, health facilities

    and we are benchmarking lots of

    these on the E-levy.

    Mr Speaker, the Ghanaian

    people need electricity, health

    facilities, and we are benchmarking

    lots of these on the yields of the E-

    Levy; yet, they are saying that we

    should not go there. They would not

    allow us to go there. In the same

    manner, we will also resist any

    Government borrowing from

    outside. Where should we have

    money to develop this country?

    [Uproar]—Kosi a enkosi; koda a, enkoda, to wit, they would not build

    but would also not retreat for others

    to build. How should we develop

    this country? That is why I talk

    about congruence of truthfulness

    and being courageous to admit to

    the truth.

    Mr Speaker, the other day,

    somebody said that when we talk

    about unveiling about 106 factories

    that are giving employment, we

    often heard my Hon Colleagues

    relate to one flagship project, the

    Komenda Sugar Factory. Without

    doubt, the Komenda Sugar Factor

    had really good intentions but let us

    face it; was it a feasible project at

    the very outset? Let us interrogate

    this. The acreage that was used to

    produce the sugarcane at Komenda

    is left with about 25 per cent of the

    land. The out-grower lands have

    gone into oil palm production. It is

    not there.

    Mr Speaker, they use to generate

    raw water from Beposo, at

    Komenda, to irrigate the sugarcane

    lands. The water in the Pra is gone,

    no thanks to galamsey. Where in the

    world do we use treated and

    purified water to irrigate

    agricultural lands? If we did that, it

    would add to the cost of production

    and not make it feasible. So, we

    should really interrogate it. It is not

    based on sentiments. Let us relate to

    these matters. I know it is dear to

    some of our Hon Colleagues and, in

    fact, all of us but let us interrogate

    the economics of it to see whether it

    is possible to go on with this

    project.

    Mr Speaker, as a nation that is

    showing so much promise,

    certainly, this country would attract

    envy and enemies. That is why I am

    happy that the Minister for Finance

    gave some account on the urgent

    need to retool the security and

    intelligence services.

    Mr Speaker, I heard my Hon

    Colleague, Mr Agalga relate to the

    fact that the retooling of the security

    services started not yesterday nor

    today. They have been with us since

    the era of Mills and Mahama. That

    is true. Every year, some allocation

    is made to them to provide some

    accoutrements for persons in the

    Services but he, James Agalga,

    agrees that the level of security

    threat just four years ago is not like

    what obtains now. He must admit to

    this fact.

    Mr Speaker, why does he not

    want to relate to the current

    situation? He should not politicise

    these matters. We need to really

    engage in what we should call real

    retooling and retrofitting of our

    security forces otherwise we may

    be overtaken by events. That is why

    when we met, all of us agreed that

    fundamentally we require not less

    than US$2 billion if we really want

    to retool the security services.

    Mr Speaker, the Minister says

    that it is difficult to mobilise such

    resources. We should allow them to

    do prioritisation which is the reason

    we are now looking at about

    US$1.2 billion to retool the security

    services to protect the security and

    stability of this country. So, he

    should not just relate to yesterday's event and pretend that nothing

    serious is happening. Let us come

    together on this.

    Mr Speaker, as a nation, we are

    in serious and dire straits. I think

    this is the time to come together and

    show our “Ghanaianness” - be together to protect the country as

    one big hold. I agree that there are

    some areas that we may have to

    look at, in particular, the allocations

    to Parliament and the Judiciary. We

    would need to interrogate this but

    we should also understand that

    never in the history of this country

    has Parliament had it better than we

    have had it under Akufo-Addo.

    Never! And yet, I recognise that

    there is space to do better than the

    Minister has done.

    Mr Speaker, there are matters

    that did not find concrete

    expression in the Budget Statement

    and Economic Policy of

    Government. The other one that

    was raised by the Hon Okudzeto

    Ablakwa in respect of the Blekusu

    Sea Defence Wall. I agree and that

    is why I wanted us to listen to the

    Hon Minister as to how we would

    move on, it is because I think that

    something immediate must be done.

    Is it possible to have it captured in

    the Budget Statement while the

    ceilings have been given and how

    we would do it? I thought that that

    engagement with the leadership of

    the various caucuses perhaps would

    have produced that result and then

    we could have spoken to it.

    Mr Speaker, we are not

    oblivious of the fact that what began

    as Keta Sea Defence Wall was

    initiated by Rawlings; in those days

    of Mr Atta Owusu Ansah, Director

    of Pentrexx Ghana Limited an

    amount of GH₵11 million was given to the victims of those 103

    houses that had been destroyed at

    that time. It was at the instance of

    the Minority at the time, edified so

    much by Prof. Mawuse Dake, who

    took this matter up for Rawlings to

    revise his notes and increase the

    allocation from GH₵11 million to GH₵96 million. If the Minority at the time had not been insistent, that

    would not have happened.

    Mr Speaker, the situation now is

    that the Minister should listen to the

    issues that have been raised and

    possibly factor the concerns of the

    sea defence at Blekusu into the

    Budget Statement. How would he

    do that? We would plead with him

    to do that.

    Mr Speaker, I also agree with the

    Minority Leader that the approval

    that was given to the Minister for

    Energy through GNPC in respect of

    Aker Energy has not been properly

    captured. That is not the language

    that was used in the Resolution. We

    would need to look at that.

    Mr Speaker, the Hon Adongo is

    giving me 10 per cent. I am

    struggling to give him 0.1 per cent.

    [Laughter] So, if he gives me 10 per

    cent I believe it is a good beginning.

    Mr Speaker, they said they

    would do further consultation on

    the issue about Agyapa Royalties

    which was withdrawn by the

    Minister. I am not too much aware

    that those consultations have taken

    place. Again, we would appeal to

    the Minister if it is possible to do

    something about the Agyapa

    Royalties deal but he is here and I

    believe he would respond to that.

    Mr Speaker, for the E-Levy, I

    believe we should know that it is the

    cornerstone of this Budget

    Statement and Economic Policy.

    The Hon Isaac Adongo is asking for

    roads in his backyard. Where would

    we get the money to do the roads?

    Should we tell his people that he

    does not want their roads to be done

    for them? Or is he saying that he has

    enough roads in his constituency

    that he does not need roads? I thank

    him very much if that is his clarion

    call.

    Mr Speaker, I think that all of us

    must own up to the fact that Ghana

    is moving in the right direction and

    we should all rally behind the

    Minister.

    As the Minister is saying, when

    we had the meeting, he gave a

    strong indication that in all his years

    as the Minister for Finance, he has

    always had the entire House, in

    spite of some criticisms or some

    strands contained in the Budget; he

    has always had consensus about

    him for the approval of the Budget.

    Mr Speaker, in conclusion, I

    would want to appeal that the Hon

    Minister is granted space to do this

    further consultation maybe, briefly,

    to see what surgery he can do to the

    Budget and then we will take the

    votes on the policy and principle of

    the Budget.

    However, to conclude, I believe

    the future of this country is bright in

    the hands of the NPP as I see the

    profuse nodding of head of Hon

    Ablakwa. His head will never be

    lost on a radar, and I know that the

    country is in good hands whenever

    the NPP is in power. It dims and

    plunges into darkness, literally, into

    ‘dumsor' when it is in the hands of the NDC.

    Mr Speaker, by what I have said,

    governance is not about

    propaganda, it is about facts and

    figures. The facts and figures speak

    for themselves. As I have always

    said, I believe that Ghanaians are

    very discerning and when the

    harvest time dawns, they know how

    to sift wheat from other produces.

    They know under which Regime,

    this country grows in leaps and

    bounds and where their bread is

    buttered.

    God bless our homeland Ghana

    and make the people bold and

    strong, and thrive in a resilient

    economy that only the NPP offers.

    Thank you very much. [Hear!
    Mr Speaker 5:44 p.m.
    Hon Members, the
    Hon Majority Leader has used 49
    minutes, 11 seconds. I think it is
    now time to listen to the prayer of
    the Hon Minister for Finance.
    Minister for Finance (Mr Ken
    Ofori-Atta): Mr Speaker, thank
    you very much indeed for this
    opportunity to be here with my
    prayer to you.
    In listening to both the Majority
    and Minority sides, it is clear that
    there are deep divisions in where we
    want to go as a nation.
    Mr Speaker, in the Budget that
    we brought for the year, as a House
    and nation, we have been able to put
    the Budget to the people of Ghana
    by consensus and this is very
    important as we look to the unity of
    the country. I have heard the
    passion with which the Hon
    Minority Leader engaged us and I
    have also listened throughout the
    past 10 days, what has been said in
    the media and have equally heard
    what we, the Majority have also
    believed in.
    We are at a crucial point in our
    history in which the President has
    proposed the establishment of a
    sustainable entrepreneurial nation
    ensuring that during that process,
    we shall have fiscal consolidation
    and job creation.
    Mr Speaker, so, there are three
    main things that we are trying to
    tackle; the issue of debt,
    employment and infrastructure
    through gathering revenues. The
    revenues have been illustrated and
    we are way behind our peers.
    My prayer to you is to enable me
    to engage with the Minority
    Caucus, Leadership and also the
    Majority before the Question is put.
    It is important that we leave this
    House with a Budget, a people with
    one language - [Interruption] -
    Mr Speaker, we must recognise
    the times that we are in and like the
    sons of Issachar in the book of 1st
    Chronicles, we have to understand

    our times and know what we must

    do as a nation. We must speak one

    language so that nothing will be

    restrained from us, as a country.

    This is going to require some

    burden-sharing on all of our part

    and therefore, the ‘big elephant' in the room is the one on E-levy. This

    is an important and critical

    introduction and I am sure we can

    work on it at the Committee level to

    make it more efficient. However,

    we cannot be afraid of it. We have

    nothing to fear, but fear itself if we

    do not make a decision.

    Mr Speaker, so I implore you to

    give me the opportunity to further

    engage our people and the Minority

    as Ghanaians always do, so that we

    will go forth in tandem with one

    language. We are a united and

    unique country and must protect

    that sociology.

    I beg for that prayer to be agreed

    on. Thank you - [Hear! Hear!].
    Mr Speaker 5:54 p.m.
    Hon Members, as
    a House, we have always put across
    to the Executive that it is important,
    during the process of the
    preparation of the Budget to engage
    Parliament early. In the year 2009,
    as the Hon Majority Leader, I led
    the House to prepare a draft Bill so
    that Parliament could be engaged
    early on in the preparation of the
    Budget.

    This is because as

    representatives of the people, we

    need to make inputs at that level and

    make sure that the policy priorities

    of the country particularly, looking

    at our development paradigm are

    complied with. The Budget

    Statement is usually prepared and

    thrusted on Parliament about a

    month to the end of the year and we

    are asked to process and pass it.

    This is the stage we have got to.

    After the debate and winding up

    of the debate, the Hon Minister has

    put across a prayer, and the prayer

    is not to even consult the whole

    House but the Leadership, and for

    me, we have passed that stage. So, I

    am prepared to put the Question for

    you to decide whether we should

    accept the prayer of the Hon

    Minister. I do not decide for the

    House so with whatever decision

    you take, we can then move to put

    the Question on the policies and

    principles of the Budget Statement.

    After that the Annual Estimates

    would be brought here for your

    consideration.

    Hon Members, the Question is

    that -

    Alhaji Mohammed-Mubarak

    Muntaka - rose -
    Mr Speaker 5:54 p.m.
    Hon Minority
    Chief Whip?
    Alhaji Muntaka 5:54 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    with the greatest of respect, you
    said that the debate has ended and
    that you would put a Question.
    However, we are not very clear
    about what you are putting the
    Question on. Is it on the request by
    the Hon Minister or it is for the
    approval of the Budget Statement?
    Mr Speaker, we did not get that
    clearly so we would be grateful if
    you could reiterate what you said.
    Thank you very much.
    Mr Speaker 5:54 p.m.
    Hon Minority
    Chief Whip, but if the Question is
    not put then how would you be clear
    about the Question? It would be
    clear to you when I put the
    Question.
    Hon Members, the Question is
    for the House to grant the prayer of
    the Hon Minister for Finance an
    opportunity to further engage with
    the Leadership.
    Question put and Motion
    negatived.

    Deputy Majority Leader (Mr

    Alexander K. Afenyo-Markin):

    Mr Speaker, in my opinion, your

    ruling does not reflect the voice

    vote. Accordingly, I shall contend

    that under Standing Order 113(2),

    the decision should be subjected to

    a Division. Mr Speaker, in terms as

    per my application and fortified by

    precedents, I shall pray humbly to

    you to consider the application in

    terms of the rules as relied on.

    Mr Speaker, thank you.
    Mr Speaker 6:04 p.m.
    Hon Members, the
    ruling of the Speaker has been
    challenged under Standing Order
    113. Standing Order 113(1) reads:
    “When the Question has been put by Mr. Speaker at
    the conclusion of the
    debate, the votes shall be
    taken by voices “Aye” and “No,” provided that Mr. Speaker may in his
    discretion instead of
    declaring the result on the
    voice votes call for a
    headcount.
    (2) A Member may call for
    headcount or division if
    the opinion of Mr. Speaker

    on the voice vote is

    challenged.”

    So, the Hon Deputy Majority

    Leader is right in his submission.

    He had challenged my decision and

    he did not ask for a headcount but

    rather a Division. The procedure for

    a division is stated in Standing

    Order 114, and it reads:

    “(1) In the case of a division, Mr.

    Speaker shall direct

    that the lobbies be

    cleared, and upon

    such direction being

    given the division

    bells shall be rung for

    one minute. After a

    lapse of two minutes

    from this direction he

    shall put the Question,

    and Mr. Speaker shall

    declare whether in his

    opinion the Ayes or

    Noes have it. If his

    opinion is again

    opposed he shall

    announce the names

    of two Tellers for the

    Ayes and two for the

    Noes and shall direct

    that a division be

    held.

    (2) The names of

    Members voting in a

    division in the House

    shall be recorded by

    Division Clerks

    immediately before

    Members pass out

    from the Ayes and

    Noes lobbies. They

    shall be counted by

    the Tellers as they

    pass out of the lobby

    doors.

    (3) The Tellers shall,

    at the conclusion of

    voting, come to the

    Table and give the

    figures to the Clerk

    who shall write them

    on the appropriate

    form. The Clerk shall

    then report these

    numbers to Mr

    Speaker who shall

    announce them to the

    House and declare the

    results of the division.

    If the Tellers disagree,

    the Clerk shall report

    the fact to Mr Speaker

    who shall thereupon

    direct that …”

    “… If the Tellers disagree, the Clerk shall

    report the fact to Mr.

    Speaker who shall

    thereupon direct that

    another division be held.

    (4) Members who are

    incapacitated by some

    physical infirmity from

    passing through the lobbies

    shall, upon reporting their

    incapacity to Mr. Speaker

    through the Clerk, be

    counted and recorded

    accordingly in the House.

    (5) If a Member states that

    he voted in error or that his

    vote was counted wrongly,

    he may, immediately after

    Mr. Speaker has announced

    the figures and before he

    declares the result of the

    division, claim to have his

    vote correctly recorded.

    (6) If the numbers in a

    division are equal, the

    motion shall be considered

    lost.”

    That is the procedure with

    Division. Now, this House, which is

    an improvised Chamber really does

    not have - we have to make do, but what I know as lobbies are not what

    we have here; usually, we make do

    with these behind-the-Speaker's curtain wall. That is what we use.

    Those are not proper lobbies but we

    have done it before. So we would

    start. This is because you opted for

    a Division and not a head count.

    That is a lengthy process but I am

    prepared to preside till anytime. But

    the decision must be taken today;

    not any other day.

    So, I direct that the lobbies be

    cleared. That is the first thing.

    Table Office, clear the lobbies.

    Hon Members, I direct further

    that the Division bells be rang.
    rose
    Mr Speaker 6:04 p.m.
    Hon Minority
    Chief Whip?
    Alhaji Muntaka 6:04 p.m.
    Thank you,
    Mr Speaker.
    Mr Speaker, as you clear the
    lobby, it is time to vote and as we
    are very conversant with the rules of
    the House, the Ministers who are
    not Members of Parliament can
    participate in all our activities
    except voting. Since it is time for
    voting, it is only proper, because of
    the nose masks, that Ministers who
    are not Members of Parliament
    excuse us since we are now going
    into the business of voting and I
    would be grateful that you add that
    directive so that they can excuse us
    because they have no role to play as
    Mr Speaker 6:04 p.m.
    Actually, that
    forms part of the directive to clear
    the lobbies. This is because at this
    time, it is only for Members of
    Parliament who can vote, not those
    who come to participate but cannot
    vote. So the next process after the
    Division bells are rang is for me to
    put the Question again to listen to
    the Ayes and Noes. That is the
    process and that is the procedure.
    rose
    Mr Speaker 6:04 p.m.
    Yes, Deputy
    Majority Leader?
    Mr Afenyo-Markin 6:14 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I rise in terms of article
    111 of the 1992 Constitution.
    Mr Speaker, my Hon
    Colleague invited you to exercise a
    discretion but he did not invoke any
    Order in our Standing Orders,
    neither did he rely on the
    Constitution but I am relying on the
    1992 Constitution. Contending the
    fact that Ministers and Deputy
    Ministers have no voting rights
    does not suggest in any way, with
    respect, that when we are voting,
    they must necessarily leave the
    Chamber.
    Mr Speaker, for the avoidance of
    doubt, I shall read the said article I
    rely on in extensor and verbatim,
    with your leave. It reads:
    “The Vice-President, or a Minister or Deputy
    Minister who is not a
    Member of
    Parliament, shall be entitled
    to participate in the
    proceedings of Parliament
    and shall be accorded all
    the privileges of a member
    of Parliament except that he
    is not entitled to vote or to
    hold an office in
    Parliament.”
    So, Mr Speaker has said, in
    granting my application, that there
    is going to be Division - we are going to vote. It cannot be that for
    the first time, we are trying to
    introduce a new precedence.
    Mr Speaker, the applicant on
    whose behalf we are proceeding in
    this direction is here, unless the Hon
    Member who invoked your
    discretion wants to suggest that his
    presence or the presence of
    Ministers in this Chamber would
    amount to interfering in the
    proceedings or that he is also saying
    that because of COVID-19 - Mr Speaker, if it is all about COVID-
    19, then perhaps, we have defied
    your order. This is because you
    even said that we could monitor

    proceedings from our own offices

    and the seats were reduced.

    So, Mr Speaker, I am saying that

    the presence of the Hon Ministers

    would not in any way affect the

    voting in the Chamber. They will

    not participate in the voting process.

    When the rule talks about clearing

    the Lobby, it was clear where they

    are seated; they are not seated in the

    Lobby. They are seated in the

    Chamber of Parliament; Plenary

    Sittings, where they are

    participating in proceedings.

    Thank you.
    Mr Speaker 6:14 p.m.
    Hon Member, you
    got it all wrong. [Hear! Hear!] This
    is not the first time that the
    Parliament of the Fourth Republic
    has applied the procedure of
    Division. Once the voice vote is
    challenged, it means that what the
    Speaker heard is different from
    what the Hon Member heard. Hon
    Member, what you heard is that the
    “Ayes” had it, but not the “Noes”. So, when you decide to take a
    Division, the intention of a Division
    is to ensure that in repeating the
    voice votes, there should not be any
    doubt as to the decision taken by
    only Members who are entitled to
    vote. That is why the Lobby does
    not only include strangers, but those
    who can be part of the debate, but
    who cannot participate in taking
    decision. That is why we would
    have to repeat the Question and
    listen to the voice vote again;
    otherwise, there would be no use to
    listen to the voice vote after all
    these elaborate procedure.
    So, I stand by my decision.
    Those who are not Members of
    Parliament, please, you are part of
    those who should be cleared, so that
    we get only Members of Parliament
    to participate in this decision; it is
    very important.
    Hon Members, if we have a non-
    Member of Parliament seated here,
    I have the power under the Standing
    Orders to call on the Marshal to get
    the person out of the House.
  • [Some Hon Members chanted: Away! Away! Away!] - [Pause]
  • Mr Speaker 6:14 p.m.
    Table Office, have
    you rang the bell for Division to
    start?
  • [Some Hon Members chanted: Away! Away! Away!]
  • Mr Speaker 6:14 p.m.
    Hon Members - ?
    [Hits the gavel] - Hon Members!
    Hon Members! Resume your seats.
    An Hon Member 6:14 p.m.
    Desperation!
    Desperation!
    Mr Speaker 6:24 p.m.
    Hon Members,
    please, let me understand what is
    happening. Allow your Hon
    Leaders to put across your
    concerns, then I can listen to you.
    Hon Members, resume your seats so
    that - [Uproar] -
    Mr Davis A. Opoku 6:24 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, as an Hon Member for the
    good people of Mpraeso, if Asiedu
    Nketia does not walk out of this
    Chamber, nothing would go on.
    [Uproar] -
    Mr Speaker 6:24 p.m.
    Hon Members, the
    request - [Uproar] -
    Mr D. A. Opoku 6:24 p.m.
    Hon
    Members on the Majority Side,
    everybody should walk out. - [Uproar] -
  • [Majority Side withdrew from the Chamber.]
  • Mr Speaker 6:24 p.m.
    Hon Members - [Uproar] -
    Hon Members, I refer you to
    Standing Order 104. With your
    indulgence, I quote:
    “In the case of grave disorder arising in the
    House, Mr Speaker may, if
    he thinks it necessary to do
    so, adjourn the House
    without Question put, or
    suspend the Sitting till a
    time to be named by him.”
    Hon Members, this is part of
    grave disorder. You should have
    read it, so that you would have
    known what it involves. So, when I
    say read and you do not read, and I
    want to draw your attention to it,
    listen. At the end of the day, you
    would have the opportunity to raise

    Hon Mahama Ayariga, I cannot

    be wrong so far as this matter is

    concerned. Please, sit down! You

    are not undermining my authority;

    you are undermining the authority

    of Parliament. I have been here 28

    years clean. Again, with your

    indulgence, I would quote Standing

    Order 104, and it says:

    “In the case of grave disorder arising in the

    House Mr Speaker may, if

    he thinks it necessary to do

    so, adjourn the House

    without Question put, or

    suspend the Sitting till a

    time to be named by him.”

    Hon Members, I am therefore going

    to suspend the Sitting.

    [Interruption] -

    Yes, Hon Majority Chief Whip?
    Alhaji Muntaka 6:24 p.m.
    Thank you,
    Mr Speaker.

    Mr Speaker -

    6. 34 p. m.
    Alhaji Muntaka 6:24 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    with the greatest of respect, our Hon
    Colleagues walked out. So many
    times in this House, one Side of the
    House has walked out for one
    reason or the other. Each time they
    do, the Business of the House
    continues. With the greatest of
    respect, I would like to refer you to
    Order 82 where I am calling for the
    withdrawal of the earlier Motion on
    the request of the Hon Minister for
    Finance that you wanted to put the
    Question. With your leave, I read:
    “A Member who has proposed a Motion may withdraw it, but if the
    Motion has been seconded, he may
    do so only by leave of the House.”
    Mr Speaker, I would like to
    plead that - [Interruption] - there
    was no Motion. He made a request
    and you followed the request with a
    Question and we were to move into
    a Division when our Hon
    Colleagues opposite walked out.
    We would like to plead with you
    that we stand down that request so
    that you could put the Question on
    the Budget Statement because we
    believe that the House started with
    over two 270 of us and we would be
    grateful that you put the Question to
    the Budget Statement so that this
    House would continue—
    Mr Speaker 6:24 p.m.
    Hon Minority
    Chief Whip, you do not know the
    state in which the Speaker is in; you
    have not even listened to how many
    minutes that I am going to suspend
    the House - [Pause] - Where you sit, you can, at any time, move out
    and come back. Where I sit, I can
    only move out through a
    Suspension or an Adjournment, so
    when I request for a Suspension,
    you must be humane and you must
    listen to me. Definitely, you cannot
    understand this procedure more
    than I do. I have lived it for how
    many years now, please.
    I will suspend proceedings for
    five minutes.
    6.37 p.m. - Sitting suspended.
    7.18 p.m. - Sitting resumed.
    Mr Speaker 6:24 p.m.
    Hon Members, I
    thank you for your indulgence. I
    was under pressure and having had
    the opportunity of five-minute
    suspension, I thought it was wise to
    get few words together to read so
    that it would be part of records as to
    what has happened and that is the
    reason I spent more than the five
    minutes. The pressure was just -

    Hon Members, as we are already

    aware, the House has concluded the

    debate on the Budget Statement and

    the Economic Policy of

    Government for the 2022 Financial

    Year. Ordinarily as the Rt Hon

    Speaker, it is my duty to put the

    Question on the Motion but you

    may recall that Hon Majority

    Leader had early on put in a request

    for the Hon Minister for Finance to

    make a prayer which request I put

    before the House. Giving where we

    were in the process, it was not

    within my power to just grant that

    prayer without the leave of the

    House and it was that leave I had to

    seek. The leave of the House I

    sought for, resulted in the disorder

    we just witnessed. The rules are

    very clear.

    The Hon Members on the

    Majority Side, opted for a division

    and not a headcount and Order 114

    gives elaborate procedure on the

    matter of division which I read to

    the House and moments, the

    Majority walked out of the

    Chamber because of the cacophony.

    I did not even know why there was

    that much noise on the side of the

    Majority so I tried to get them to

    understand that they should pass

    their concerns to their leaders so

    that I would give opportunity for the

    leaders to articulate why there was

    that disorder in that part of the

    House. I did not get it until they

    started to move out and later a paper

    was passed unto me that they

    insisted that the general secretary of

    the NDC should leave the public

    gallery before the Question should

    be put. I was not even given that

    opportunity to decide whether to let

    him be at the public gallery or not.

    This is the stage we have reached.

    The question is whether we should

    proceed now.

    This is a national Budget

    Statement that affects all the

    citizens who arrive on us to do what

    is best for them.

    Hon Members, I would proceed

    to read in detail Order 114 which

    we were about to follow to

    implement. I did not decide to use

    division - the Majority opted for the division and so I was compelled to

    follow the Standing Orders on

    division. Standing Order 114 (1)

    says:

    “In the case of a division, Mr Speaker shall direct that

    the lobbies be cleared, and

    upon such direction being

    given the division bells

    shall be rung for one

    minute. After a lapse of two

    minutes from this direction

    he shall put the Question,

    and Mr Speaker shall

    declare whether in his

    opinion the Ayes or Noes

    have it. If his opinion is

    again opposed he shall

    announce the names of two

    Tellers for the Ayes and

    two for the Noes and shall

    direct that a division be

    held''.

    This was what we followed. I

    directed that the lobbies be cleared,

    I directed that the division bells be

    rang for one minute and then two

    minutes were to lapse. I put the

    Question again and the purpose of

    division is to make sure that you

    clear from the House all those who

    are not qualified by law to

    participate in the decision taking in

    this case, the voice vote. I have seen

    it practiced in other parliaments and

    we have also practiced it before.

    You would recall that one time that

    we did not practice the division and

    they did head count alone, the

    number on the other Side was more

    than the number of the members in

    the House and we had to struggle to

    know who was the unqualified

    person who voted. I was in the

    House and Mr K. E. K. Takyi was

    the Clerk to Parliament at that time.

    So, the purpose of division is to get

    anybody who cannot vote out of the

    Chamber to leave only qualified

    Hon Members to vote using the

    voice vote. That is what is said in

    the Standing Orders. Now, it would

    not be that other people might have

    added their voices to what the one

    Side or the other would have done.

    Standing Order 114 (2) says:

    “The names of Members voting in the division in the

    House shall be recorded by

    Division Clerks

    immediately before

    Members pass out from the

    Ayes and Noes lobbies''.

    So, it cannot be any other

    member but Hon Members

    qualified to vote whose names shall

    be recorded. That was exactly the

    process I followed. Hon Members,

    this is what the rule of law means - fidelity to the law. We are bound by

    the law. Since the Majority who

    opted for the division have also

    opted to walk out, walk outs are

    permitted and as a former Hon

    Minority Leader, I led a number of

    walk outs but that did not prevent

    the House to do its business. [Hear

    Hear] In the Seventh Parliament, a

    number of them occurred and the

    House went on with the business.

    This House thinks that there is

    nothing wrong with that procedure

    and therefore, the House would

    proceed with the business of the
    Mr Speaker 7:28 p.m.
    Hon Members, I
    would have ordinarily put the
    Question and listen to the voice
    vote. Because there has been a
    walk-out, I would want a head
    count so that we get to know the
    number in the House and whether
    we satisfy the constitutional
    requirements of taking a decision
    which we know requires the
    quorum of the House to do so. Hon
    Members are at liberty to refer to
    their Constitution and see the
    numbers required for quorum of the
    House. [Pause] -
    rose
    Mr Speaker 7:28 p.m.
    Yes, Hon First
    Deputy Minority Whip? I saw you
    on your feet and that is why I gave
    you the opportunity.
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim 7:28 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I have been given a
    superior advice.
    Mr Speaker 7:38 p.m.
    What kind of

    - [Pause] Hon Members, for the avoidance

    of doubt, article 102 says:

    “A quorum of Parliament, apart from the person

    presiding, shall be one-

    third of all the members of

    Parliament.”

    That is the quorum of Parliament

    which permits us to transact

    Business. I referred to that because

    I want to satisfy myself and all of

    you before we proceed. We could

    only do that by getting the numbers

    present in the House. Therefore, I

    would put the Question and we

    would go by a head count.

    Question put and the House was

    counted.

    AYES - 0

    NOES - 137

    ABSTENTIONS - 0

    Resolved accordingly.
    Mr Speaker 7:38 p.m.
    Hon Members,
    early in the days after my election
    as the Speaker, I did pledge to the
    good people of this country through
    you that I will do everything in my
    power not to obstruct Government
    Business. I did so, expecting
    reciprocity that Government will
    also do everything not to frustrate or
    obstruct the Business of Parliament.
    As your Speaker, I will do all I
    can, not to allow Government to

    obstruct or frustrate Parliament in

    its lawful duty - [Hear! Hear!] - and that is a pledge to the good

    people of Ghana. There is good

    reason the people of Ghana elected

    this Parliament to be a hung

    Parliament - those who pretend to say that it is a mere ‘hung' Parliament of 137 on both Sides - [Hear! Hear!].

    The Independent Member of

    Parliament who decided to do

    Business with one Side made them

    a Majority group and there is no

    majority party in this House [Hear!

    Hear!]. I would want to repeat that

    there is no majority party in this

    House.

    So, I would like to thank those

    who have been able to patiently

    wait up to this time for us to finish

    the Business of the day. This is a

    new beginning, where, for the first

    time, a Majority has walked out

    from its own Business. [Hear!

    Hear!].

    I would like to end here - [Interruption] - in the absence of any further Business, to proceed to

    adjourn the House unless

    Leadership would want to say a few

    words.

    In the absence of any other

    Business to transact and since

    Leadership has no more concerns

    for today, the House would have to

    adjourn - [Interruption] -

    Yes, Hon Minority Leader?

    Yes, Hon Suhuyini Sayibu? I - [Interruption] -

    Hon Members, it is nine minutes

    to 8:00 p.m. - [Pause] - Hon Members, the House is adjourned

    till Tuesday.
    ADJOURNMENT 7:38 p.m.