Very
well. Their record will verify.
Hon Members, on page 9, I
noticed that the Votes and Pro-
ceedings, the item listed as 5 says
that:
“The Hon First Deputy Speaker sought to give a ruling which was
interrupted following an uproar in the
Chamber.”
That is not the end of the matter. I
actually concluded, gave the ruling
and hit the gavel. I recall bringing it
to the attention of the Table Office
and showing to them the evidence to
correct the Votes and Proceedings.
So, please take note and make the
appropriate correction.
Minority Leader (Mr Haruna
Iddrisu): Mr Speaker, I want to hear
you clearly; you are on page 9 and as
far as we are concerned, what reflects
on page 9 is a true reflection of what
transpired in this House, that I moved
a motion relying on Standing Order
50 (1) and 50 (2) as was done by my
Hon Colleague, the Majority Leader,
a day before.
Mr Speaker, you seek to correct
this. Yes, there was an uproar
because you had to put the Question
on the Motion that was so ably moved
by me and seconded by Hon Mahama
Ayariga. Under the circumstance,
there was some disorderliness in the
House, and as far as we are con-
cerned, you suspended the House and
the Hon Second Deputy Speaker
came to adjourn the House.
Mr Speaker, when I hear you now
saying that you are giving directives
to the Table Office, directives to do
what? This is because you told this
House that you are not the Speaker,
but you are the Member of
Parliament (MP) for Bekwai.
[Laughter]. Therefore, if you are the
MP for Bekwai, my application was
to the Speaker. You said you are not
the Speaker, so if you say that you
want to correct it --
Mr Speaker, I should think that
the only correction which must
reflect, and I hope that you direct
Table Office to do same, is that in
moving my Motion, I copiously and
judiciously made references to article
102 of the 1992 Constitution and
Standing Order 109 of the Parliament
of Ghana, which must also reflect.
This is because on the previous day,
as Hon Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu
made reference to the Constitution
and Standing Orders, his was recog-
nised in the Votes and Proceedings.
What is sauce for the goose is sauce
for the gander.
Mr Speaker, you are yourself a
lawyer and authoritatively, parlia-
mentary debates have become a guide
to interpretation beyond the British
ruling in Pepper v Hart, therefore we
know that reference to the Consti-
tution and our Standing Orders must
at all times be respected. So, I have a
difficulty with the direction that you
are giving to the Table Office
because as far as we are concerned, I
moved a Motion, which was seconded
by Hon Mahama Ayariga when the
debate as recorded there, concluded.
After the conclu-sion of the debate,
Mr Speaker, yours is simply to put
the question, nothing more.
Mr Speaker, importantly, deci-
sions in Parliament are not about
somebody's imagined majority out- side this Chamber and outside the
precincts of Parliament. It is about
Members present, meaning Members
available and Members voting.
Therefore, I have a difficulty with the
directive you are giving the Table
Office. Mr Speaker, be reminded that
I did not invoke any different rule
other than what was invoked by my
Hon Colleague the day before. So, let
me hear your ruling well, and I will
do what is appropriate within our
Standing Orders and within the 1992
Constitution.
Mr Speaker, I however think that
it will be wrong for you to direct the
Table Office to tamper with or alter
what is reported on page 9. Let me
add that the Table Office should add
that I made reference to article 102,
that the person presiding shall not be
part of what constitutes quorum and
the person presiding shall not be part
of a decision that should be taken. I
thank you Mr Speaker.