Mr. Speaker, thank you for giving me the opportunity to contribute to this motion that was ably moved by the hon. Member for Akim Oda, Mr. Osafo-Maafo, and seconded by the hon. Member for Bole/ Bamboi, Mr. John Mahama.
Mr. Speaker, essentially, the State of the Nation Address contains the vision of the Leader of the State and it is his fundamental right to present the State of the Nation to this Parliament. On the basis of that, one can say it is based on the nature of the President. If he is a success achiever, his ambitions will be big; if he is a failure avoider, his targets would be lower. It is for all of us to judge what sort of State of the Nation Address His Excellency has delivered to us on this occasion.
In my humble opinion, the Address is an improvement as far as its harshness and the nature of blames it has always heaped on previous governments is concerned. But I must say that it falls short of the others that were delivered before this one in terms of detail in respect of the State of the Nation. And I can say that all the previous Addresses made by those before him and his own Addresses often contained what, indeed, was the current state from which stage he would then go ahead to indicate what he wants to pursue during the Session.
Mr. Speaker, in this Address, one can say that there are very few specific targets that one can hold His Excellency to at the end of the first year. The Sessional Address is not for the entire period of his rule, but for the Session in which we are, that is the period between now and December. Mr. Speaker, at the end of December, what can
we say that the President has achieved or has not achieved, if he does not give us exactly what he expects to achieve? I had thought that some specific indicators or indices should have been targeted so that we evaluate him on the basis of those.
Mr. Speaker, I am also very disappointed with the choice of priorities. I thought that everybody in this country knew that our infrastructure is still very weak and that His Excellency would continue to choose infrastructural development as one of his major priorities. The way it is, it is not among the three and therefore it is going to play second fiddle to the rest of the priorities.
In the last four years, only $5 million was invested in the railway sector and yet there is a lot of noise about developing that sector. What are we going to do during the next year? Will it continue to be ignored just as was done in the last four years?
With the road sector, I can state without any contradiction that in the last four years, a lot of regions have not seen any road sector development. In the Upper West Region, for instance, in the last four years, not two kilometres of roads were tarred in that region. Maybe, the Upper West Region is an exception, but I am also sure that the rest of the regions are not far behind. We do not know why the Upper West Region was left out in the road development sector. Even ongoing projects of the previous government were stopped.
Mr. Speaker, apart from the road sector, there are a number of other infrastructural projects that need attention -- the provision of urban water in a lot of communities is still waiting for attention. For instance, in the Upper West
Region, the regional capital depends on underground water and their aquifer are drying up while there are surface water resources that ought to be developed. I believe that infrastructure should have received the priority of His Excellency the President.
Apart from that, when we look at electrification, in my constituency which is the Jirapa constituency, there are only four communities that are connected to the national grid, and this was done under SHEP III. We are now under SHEP IV and yet more than 95 per cent of the communities in my constituency are waiting for electrification.
I believe that the emphasis on human resource development is a reasonable priority except that His Excellency the President has not taken a good look at the true reason for the lagging behind of education in the country. The extension of the duration of senior secondary school (SSS) to four years is going to increase costs and remain burdensome to a number of rural and urban workers who are now finding it difficult to educate their children.
Mr. Speaker, it is not a radical introduction to say that there will be two more years for pre-school, because most of us sitting here, particularly those of us from the urban areas, had sent our children to pre-schools before they gained admission to the primary school. It is just a matter of extending it to the rural areas. A lot of hon. Members of Parliament (MPs), in fact, some of those who are even around 50 years went through kindergarten. Of course, it is only those who were in the villages maybe herding cattle or herding sheep, or those who were accompanying their brothers and fathers on fishing expeditions, as well as those who were going to the cocoa farms with their grandmothers and grandfathers who probably did not go through the kindergartens. So I do not think it is anything radical to extend it to the rural