Mr. Speaker, I want to be able to support the Statement made by my hon. Colleague on children who act as aid to our beggars.
Mr. Speaker, in the Statement that he made, two salient issues came to the fore. The first issue is about children who are able-bodied and should be in school but are in the streets aiding those who are begging. But the question that comes to my mind is, who are the parents of these children? How responsible are they? Why should children who otherwise should have been in the school be found in the streets aiding people to beg? A time has
come for us as a people to look seriously at the issue of parental responsibility.
Mr. Speaker, being a father or mother of a child goes beyond the biological role. Mr. Speaker, many children in the streets, some of them do not even know the names of their daddies, their fathers. There are some of the children in the streets who do not have any motherly care. There are so many of them who think that helping somebody to beg is a way of they themselves getting something to eat and we need to look seriously at these issues.
Mr. Speaker, another issue which came to my mind as he made this Statement is the issue of the attitude of parents to physically-challenged children. Mr. Speaker, we need to do a lot of education in this country to let parents know that being physically-challenged is not necessarily a disability. Mr. Speaker, somebody might be a cripple but very intelligent. Somebody might not be able to see but would be able to use the hands. Mr. Speaker, linking any defects in any of our limbs or in any part of our body to a very serious disability which should draw you to the streets is something that we should look seriously at.
Mr. Speaker, talking about physically- challenged, begging - dehumanises. When you are in the streets and you find people begging and the way sometimes people frown at them, the way sometimes we even push them aside, shows that begging in any form should not be tolerated.
But Mr. Speaker, on the issue of the children who should be in schools I believe that the parents do not have any excuse by saying that they cannot even pay school fees for these children because fees at the basic level have been abolished.
But Mr. Speaker, I also think that the
Children's Act - The very purpose of the Children's Act is to offer protection to children. If by what the import of the Statement is we believe that as a House, probably the provisions in the Children's Act are inadequate to give the kind of protection that we want for the children, then probably as a House, we might want to look at the Children's Act again and see whether there are certain provisions which are lacking and which should be there.
Mr. Speaker, it also came to my mind, when we were looking at the Children's Act - this point was made that even in the Criminal Code there are sections which give protection to children. Mr. Speaker, we need to look at these and see why children are not so being protected that they can, at liberty, go to the streets; sometimes they are knocked down by cars and we do not know what to do.
Mr. Speaker, finally, the Statement that has been made is a very serious statement. But I also know that the hon. Minister for Manpower, Youth and Employment has programmes for skills training and I also know that some of the physically --challenged are taking advantage of the skills training so that they might be able to have something to help them live and live in dignity. I wish to implore, Mr. Speaker, that we try to push -- The Disability Bill that we have been talking about for quite a time, we should bring it to the fore; we should make sure that we speed it up. I believe that when we pass that Disability Bill, we will be able to address some of the issues that the hon. Member who made the Statement has raised this morning. But in generality, this is a good statement; we should look at it.
I am also looking at the role of Members of Parliament in our constituencies. Are we going to be able to identify those