Debates of 24 Sep 2018

MR SPEAKER
ANNOUNCEMENTS 1 p.m.

Mr Speaker 1 p.m.
Hon Members, t he House has been recalled from recess to consider some important parliamentary Business from today to Friday, 28th September, 2018. Indeed, the Sitting may be extended if urgent business arranged by the Business Committee are not completed within the set timeline.
While I warmly welcome you back to the House from your constituencies or whichever location you might have proceeded from, in pursuit of the recall, let us continue to serve Mother Ghana with zeal and patriotism in all our endeavours.
As has always been the case, your honourable presence and services are needed once more to enable the House go through all the required processes to complete on time the Business arranged by the Business Committee and others that may come along in the course of the period.
I respectfully crave your indulgence to accord work in the House with the needed attention. As a former Member of Parliament (MP), I share the plight emanating from the arduous and multiple functional roles that you play as elected Members of Parliament, both during term time and otherwise. Hence my plea this time, to devote more time if not all, to the work arranged for this short but important Sitting.
Mr Speaker 1 p.m.


SPACE FOR LETTER -- PAGE 6 - 1.00 P.M. SPACE FOR LETTER -- PAGE 7 - 1.00 P.M.

.
Mr Haruna Iddrisu 1:10 a.m.
Mr Speaker, thank
you very much.
I note your reference to the Communication from the President dated 24th September, 2018, on the appointment or reshuffling of Ministers. I see that in the particular reference, the President -- I am sure because of his background as a lawyer, he has referred to articles 78 and 256 of the Constitution.
My understanding of the power of the President to appoint Ministers is one of a shared responsibility with the legislative organ or Parliament of Ghana. This is particularly so in the famous ruling of J. H. Mensah vs the Attorney-General, 1997 Supreme Court Report. The term “prior approval” was defined.
Mr Speaker, may I refer you to article 256 to see whether you would not want to guide this House forward or make a proper determination of this matter. With your permission I quote:
“(1) The President shall, with the prior approval of Parliament, appoint for each region, a Minister of State who shall --
(a) represent the President in the region; and
(b) be responsible for the co- ordination and direction of the administrative machinery in the region.”
Then when you come to article 78, I believe it is contingent on article 76 which is the composition of Cabinet and it reads:
“78. (1) Ministers of State shall be appointed by the President with the prior approval of Parliament from among members of Parliament or persons qualified to be elected as members of Parliament, except that the majority of Ministers of State shall be appointed from among members of Parliament.”
Mr Speaker, is it not about time this Parliament decided whether when a Regional Minister is being elevated to the position of a Cabinet Minister, he must appear before the Appointments Committee? We need to make a determination. Because from a Regional Minister -- within the meaning of article 256 -- cannot be the same in the thinking of the framers of the Constitution --
Mr Speaker 1:10 a.m.
When a Regional Minister is being elevated to the position of a Cabinet Minister?
Mr Iddrisu 1:10 a.m.
That is my understanding.
Mr Speaker 1:10 a.m.
Is it an elevation?
Mr Iddrisu 1:10 a.m.
Yes, Mr Speaker.
Mr Speaker 1:10 a.m.
The President shall determine who would be Cabinet Ministers among his pool of Ministers and there is no limitation in the Constitution in that regard.
Mr Iddrisu 1:10 a.m.
Mr Speaker, if I could land.
Mr Speaker 1:10 a.m.
No, I want you to address that. This is because you are introducing the -- [Interruption.]
Order! Order!
You are introducing an element of elevation, and I am drawing your attention to the fact that this needs to be properly

examined because to the best of my knowledge, the President in his wisdom could make -- though I know it has not happened yet. There is no constitutional limitation to his making a Regional Minister a Cabinet Minister for reasons best known to him.

Please, you may continue.
Mr Iddrisu 1:10 a.m.
Mr Speaker, I would take guidance from that.

Mr Speaker, in the likely or unlikely event, what I know is that Hon Ken Ofori- Atta appeared before Parliament's Appointments Committee to demonstrate his competencies for finance and not for monitoring and evaluation.

So, if he has to move to the Ministry of Monitoring and Evaluation, could Parliament not play a role in saying that he came to Parliament with his competence as Minister for Finance, given his background as an Investment Economist. Now he is being moved to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Regional Integration to do diplomacy. Must he just walk with bag and baggage without reporting back to Parliament?

Mr Speaker, I invite you, Leadership and our Colleagues, that our new Standing Orders should seek to right some of these wrongs that I assume might be consti- tutionally challenging for us, going forward.
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, the Hon Minority Leader has raised an issue which I believe should honestly engage the attention of the House. I agree with him, that when a Minister is nominated, that Minister would be in charge of just one compartment of this country.
A sector Minister superintends over the entirety of the country. The difficulty however, is that the same nomenclature is applied for Regional Ministers and sector Ministers which is why the article the Hon Minority Leader quoted, article 256 (1) provides and with your indulgence, I would want to read:
“(1) The President shall, with the prior approval of Parliament, appoint for each region, a Minister of State who shall --”
Mr Speaker, the other article he quoted, that is article 78, also uses the same terminology, “Minister of State”. Article 78 (1) provides:
“(1) Ministers of State shall be appointed by the President with the prior approval of Parlia- ment…”
This is just like it is captured for the appointment of the Regional Ministers. Yes, the Regional Ministers come under the section of decentralisation. So you would say that technically, they are different, except that the Constitution uses the same language and Hon Ministers of State are also defined by the Constitution.
With that, no distinction is made between an Hon Regional Minister and an Hon sector Minister, but I agree that technically, we should desist from these facts, and going forward as a House, let
us come to some determination as to what to do with the Hon Regional Ministers becoming Hon Ministers of State, that is sector Ministers.
Mr Speaker, the convention in this House has always been that whenever a Regional Minister is elevated to the position of a sector Minister, it does not come to this House. Since 1997 that I have been in this House, there has not been one instance. They just migrate seamlessly, but I agree with the principle that the Hon Minority Leader raised. I have raised this matter in the House before.
Mr Speaker, the issue has to do with the horizontal adjustment that has been happening. We may create an Hon Minister of Horticulture and vet the person for that ministry and then the following day, the President does some lateral adjustment and that person then becomes the Hon Minister for Finance -- we should interrogate this.
This is because when we vet the Minister for Horticulture, nobody raises any issue about energy or finance and yet the following day, the President could lift the person to another ministry without the person coming to Parliament because it is deemed that an ‘'Hon Minister of State'' is an ‘'Hon Minister of State''.
Mr Speaker, I believe that going forward as a House, we should interrogate this and come to some firm determination. If we do that the President would put in much more consideration in appointing or nominating a person in the first place to any ministry so that no ministry becomes a turf for trial and error.
A person goes there and if he or she performs he or she stays, but if he or she does not perform and has to be changed, he or she has to come back to Parliament
for his or her competences in the area that he or she has been assigned to anew to be tested. If it is agreed, then, we let you up. I believe it would improve our governance architecture.

Mr Speaker, the Hon Minority Leader says that politically, I disagree. I do not disagree. What he said is not supported by practice or convention. That is why I disagree with him, but technically, I believe he has a point. I have raised these matters in this House before and it is for the House to interrogate the issues and if we believe that it should find space in the new Standing Orders, so be it, but for now, the status quo should hold.
rose
Mr Speaker 1:20 p.m.
Thank you very much Hon Members, we should proceed.
Yes, Hon Dr Anthony Akoto Osei?
Dr A. A. Osei 1:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I am not a lawyer, but in the Constitution there is no mention of the President appointing Hon sector Ministers. If we would want to be rigorous, then we should go back and do that.
This is because an Hon Minister of State is an Hon Minister of State and he or she is capable of heading any ministry. It is his or her common sense, background or profession that allows him or her to do the work as an Hon Minister of State to advise the President. It does not say that because I am an economist, therefore, I should be in the Ministry of Finance. There is no criteria like that.
Dr A. A. Osei 1:20 p.m.


In other countries it would be found that Presidents appoint Ministers who are competent first and foremost and who can manage the ministries. It is the issue of management.

Mr Speaker, it is often said that the best or worst Hon Ministers of Health are the health professionals. That is what I am told in our history. [Laughter] --If we would want the President to appoint sector ministers, we should amend the Constitution and say that for example, if an Hon Minister for Agriculture is appointed, there must be a qualification that he or she has expertise in agriculture.

The Constitution does not say that but there is a reason. I am sure the framers of the Constitution had a purpose for not including that, so we should be careful and not allocate to ourselves the responsibility of examining professions.

Parliament cannot say that it has the capacity to examine professions in this area. I do not believe so. We may be economist, lawyers or teachers, but it does not qualify us to properly examine professions and we should not allocate ourselves with that. People have their professional licenses and it is not up to Parliament to pretend that we know what to do.
Dr Kwaku Afriyie 1:20 p.m.
On a point of order. Mr Speaker, much as I agree with the arguments advanced by Hon Dr Osei Akoto, I object to the premise that the worse Hon Ministers of Health are doctors.
Certainly, I have held that portfolio before and he has no scientific basis for saying that. I can proudly say that I led the Health Insurance Scheme to be initiated in this country. [Hear! Hear] -- So I strongly object to that and I would want him to withdraw --[Laughter.]
Dr A. A. Osei 1:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I withdraw the statement that health professionals were the worst Hon Ministers. However, I am told that some non-health professional Ministers were always better at the Ministry of Health. That is a matter of judgement.
Mr Speaker, I apologise and withdraw, but I remember in his time he was a very competent Hon Minister of Health.
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, the Hon Minister for Monitoring and Evaluation would know that the provisions that are in the Standing Orders were borrowed from the Westminster system, where we do not really have to assign experts and specialists to the various sectors. They go there and learn the rules there -- that is why we have the Standing Order.
Mr Speaker, in the strict executive system, Hon Ministers are appointed to the various sectors for their competences in their various fields. That is why the sector committees vet them.
rose
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I have not finished. Would the Hon Minister for Monitoring and Evaluation assume his seat? When I finish and he has any residual matters to raise, he may raise them, but I may sit down and allow him and I would come back.
Mr Speaker 1:20 p.m.
Hon Members, it is very interesting to note that repeatedly, we hear from the Appointments Committee that the essence of the Hon Ministers qualification is that qualification in the Constitution which talks about qualified to be an Hon Minister of Parliament and we keep on emphasising it.
I have heard it and it is not something I very much personally agree to, because that should not be the essence of it. We may talk of a person who is qualified
basically to be an Hon Member of Parliament because of the age and other factors that we all know, but we may not necessarily want him or her to be an Hon Minister, and yet we ourselves keep on emphasising and sometimes, making things easier for people to say “he or she is already qualified to be an Hon Member of Parliament and he or she is an Hon Member of Parliament''. So we too must examine that ambivalence.
If in future we would want to insist on certain technocratic qualifications, these are things that we should all examine, but that is for another day.
Hon Members, we would continue.
VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS AND THE OFFICIAL REPORT 1:30 p.m.

Mr Speaker 1:30 p.m.
Hon Members, Correction of Votes and Proceedings of Saturday, 28th July, 2018.
Page 1…21 —
rose
Mr Speaker 1:30 p.m.
Yes, Hon Member?
Dr Afriyie 1:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I beg to take this Honourable House back to page 8. I noticed that I was marked absent. On that day, I filled in the proper form, submitted it and was granted permission to be in the region for our official duty.
Mr Speaker 1:30 p.m.
Thank you very much.
Page 22…27
Hon Members, the Votes and Proceedings of Saturday, 28th July, 2018
as corrected, be hereby admitted as the true record of proceedings.
Hon Members, Business Statement — Hon Majority Leader.
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE 1:30 p.m.

Majority Leader/Chairman of the Business Committee (Mr Osei Kyei- Mensah-Bonsu) 1:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, as Hon Members are already aware, the House has been recalled pursuant to Order 42(3) of the Standing Orders of Parliament.
The Business Committee accordingly met today, Monday, 24th September, 2018, and arranged Business of the House for the Emergency Meeting ending Friday, 28th September, 2018.
The House is expected to consider among others, the following urgent matters:
i. Approval of H.E. the President's nomination of persons for appointment as Justices to fill vacancies on the Supreme Court Bench.
ii. Receipt of communication in respect of H. E. the President's nomination of persons for appointment as Ministers and Deputy Ministers and conside- ration of same by the House. This is to ensure that the Ministers assume their offices to oversee the preparation of the respective sector Ministries' budgets to feed into the presentation of the National Budget in November 2018.
iii. Consideration and passing of the Minerals Income Investment Fund Bill, 2018, for the full implementation of the 2018 Budget.
Majority Leader/Chairman of the Business Committee (Mr Osei Kyei- Mensah-Bonsu) 1:30 p.m.


iv. Supplier's Credit Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the Federal Republic of Brazil for an amount of ninety-five million, four hundred and fifty thousand United States dollars (US$95, 450,000.00) to finance the establishment and strengthen- ing of Agricultural Mechani- sation Service Centres (AMSECs).

v. Continuation of the Considera- tion of the Right to Information Bill, 2018.

Subject to the exigency of progress of work on the above and the extent of deliberations at Committee, the House may also consider

i. The Report of the Committee on Mines and Energy on the Novation and Amendment Agreement to the Build, Own, Operate and Transfer Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and Africa and Middle East Resources Invest- ment Group Llc (Ameri Energy) for the installation of ten (10) GE TM 2500+ aero derivative gas turbines, operate, maintain, transfer and provision of support services dated 10.02.2015 between the Government of the Republic of Ghana, Volta River Authority, Africa and Middle East Resources Investment Group Llc., Ameri Energy Power Equipment Trading Llc., Power Projects Insaat Ticaret Limited Sirketi, and Mytilineos Inter- national Trading Company.

ii. The Commercial Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and Sino- hydro Corporation Limited for an amount of up to five hundred million United States dollars (US$500,000,000.00) for the construction of Priority Road Infrastructure Projects—Phase 1, under the Master Project Support Agreement.

Arrangement of Business

Formal Communications by the Speaker

Mr Speaker, you may read communi- cations to the House, if any is available today.

Statements

Mr Speaker, pursuant to Order 70(2), Ministers of State may be permitted to make Statements of Government policy. Statements, especially commemorative ones, duly admitted by the Rt Hon Speaker may be made in the House by Hon Members, in accordance with Order 72.

Bills, Papers and Reports

Mr Speaker, Bills may be presented to the House for First Reading and those of urgent nature may be taken through the various stages in one day in accordance with Order 119. Papers and committee reports that are ready shall be presented to the House.

Motions and Resolutions

Mr Speaker, Motions would be debated and their consequential Resolutions if any taken during the course of the Emergency Meeting.

The Business Committee sincerely commend all Hon Members for their positive response to the recall of the House. It is hoped that Members would lend their support to the transaction of the urgent business scheduled for action by Parliament.

Conclusion

Mr Speaker, in accordance with Order 160(2) and subject to Order 53, the Committee submits to this Honourable House the order in which the Business of the House shall be taken during the period under consideration.

Statements

Presentation of Papers--

(a) Financing Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank Group for an amount of twenty-seven million, nine hundred thousand Special Drawing Rights (SDR27,900,000.00) [Equivalent to US$40 million] to finance the proposed Tourism Development Project.

(b) Financing Agreement (Amended and Restated Financing Agreement) between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank Group for an amount of thirty- four million, eight hundred thousand Special Drawing Rights (SDR34,800,000.00) [Equivalent to US$50 million] to finance the Ghana Commercial Agriculture Project

(GCAP).

(c) Request for waiver of Import Duties, Import VAT, Import NHIL, ECOWAS Levy, EXIM Levy, Special Import Levy amounting to the Ghana cedi equivalent of two million, eight hundred and seventy-two thousand, nine hundred and eighty-five United States dollars (US$2,872,985.00) on project materials and equipment to be imported in respect of the construction of Advanced Research Centre for infectious diseases at the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana, Legon.

(d) Contract Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana (represented by the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana) and Shimizu Corporation of Japan for an amount of one billion, six hundred and eighty million, eight hundred and sixteen thou-

sand Japanese Yen only J/YI, 680,Y1,680,816,000.00) for the construction of Advanced Research Centre for infectious diseases at the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana, Legon.

(e) Financing Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank Group for an amount of twenty-five million, two hundred and forty thousand Special Drawing Rights (SDR25,240,000.00) [Equivalent to US$35 million] to finance the proposed Public Sector Reform for Results Project (PSRRP).
Majority Leader/Chairman of the Business Committee (Mr Osei Kyei- Mensah-Bonsu) 1:30 p.m.
(f) Supplier's Credit Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the Federal Republic of Brazil for an amount of ninety-five million, four hundred and ninety-five thousand United States dollars (US$95,450,000.00) to finance the establishment and strengthening of Agricultural Mechanisation Service Centres (AMSECs).
(g) Report of the Appointments Committee on the President's nominations for appointment as Justices of the Supreme Court.
Consideration Stage of Bills --
Right to Information Bill, 2018. (Continuation)
Minerals Income Investment Fund Bill, 2018.
Committee Sittings.

Statements

Presentation of Papers --

(a) Report of the Finance Committee on the Protocol of Amendment to the International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonisation of Customs Procedures.

(b) Report of the Committee on Communications on the Buda- pest Convention on Cybercrime.

Motions --

(a) Adoption of the Report of the Appointments Committee on H. E. the President's nominations for appointment as Justices of the Supreme Court.

(b) That this Honourable House adopts the Report of the Public Accounts Committee on the Performance Audit Report of the Auditor-General on the Disposal of Government Vehicles by the Ministry of Food and Agricul- ture and the Ghana Health Service.

(Moved on Thursday, 25th January, 2018 by the Hon Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, Mr James Klutse Avedzi and seconded by the Hon Member for Fanteakwa South, Mr. Kofi Okyere Agyekum)

(c) Adoption of the Report of the Public Accounts Committee on the Report of the Auditor-General on the Public Accounts of Ghana (Public Boards, Corporations and other Statutory Institutions) for the year ended 31st December,

2015.

Consideration Stage of Bills--

Right to Information Bill, 2018. (Continuation)

Minerals Income Investment Fund Bill, 2018. (Continuation)

Committee Sittings.

Statements

Motions --

That this Honourable House adopts the Report of the Committee of Privileges on Breach of Privilege and Contemptuous Remarks allegedly made by the Hon Member for Assin Central Constituency, Mr Ken Ohene Agyapong.

Consideration Stage of Bills--

Right to Information Bill, 2018. (Continuation)

Minerals Income Investment Fund Bill, 2018. (Continuation)

Committee Sittings.

Statements

Presentation of Papers --

(a) Report of the Finance Committee on the Financing Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the International Development Asso- ciation (IDA) of the World Bank Group for an amount of twenty- seven million, nine hundred thousand Special Drawing Rights (SDR27,900,000.00) [equivalent to US$40 million] to finance the proposed Tourism Development Project.

(b) Report of the Finance Committee on the Financing Agreement (Amended and Restated Finan- cing Agreement) between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the International

Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank Group for an amount of thirty-four million, eight hundred thousand Special Drawing Rights (SDR34,800,000.00) [Equi- valent to US$50 million] to finance the Ghana Commercial Agriculture Project (GCAP).

(c) Report of the Finance Committee on the Request for waiver of Import Duties, Import VAT, Import NHIL, ECOWAS Levy, EXIM Levy, Special Import Levy amounting to the Ghana cedi equivalent of two million, eight hundred and seventy-two thousand, nine hundred and eightyfive United States dollars (US$2,872,985.00) on project materials and equipment to be imported in respect of the construction of Advanced Research Center for Infectious Diseases at the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana, Legon.

(d) Report of the Finance Committee on the Financing Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the International Development Asso- ciation (IDA) of the World Bank Group for an amount of twenty-five million, two hundred and forty thousand Special Drawing Rights (SDR25,240,000.00) [equivalent to US$35 million] to finance the proposed Public Sector Reform for Results Project (PSRRP).

(e) Report of the Finance Committee on the Supplier's Credit Agreement between the Government of the
Majority Leader/Chairman of the Business Committee (Mr Osei Kyei- Mensah-Bonsu) 1:30 p.m.
Republic of Ghana and the Federal Republic of Brazil for an amount of ninety-five million, four hundred and fifty thousand United States dollars (US$95,450,000.00) to finance the establishment and Strengthening of Agricultural Mechanisation Service Centres (AMSECs).
(f) Report of the Committee on Health on the Contract Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana (represented by the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana) and Shimizu Corporation of Japan for an amount of one billion, six hundred and eighty million, eight hundred and sixteen thousand Japanese Yen only (J/Y1,680,816,000.00) for the construction of advanced Research Center for Infectious Diseases at the Noguchi Memo- rial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana, Legon.
Motions--
(a) Adoption of the Report of the Finance Committee on the Protocol of Amendment to the International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonisa- tion of Customs Procedures.
Consequential Resolution
(b) Adoption of the Report of the Committee on Communications on the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime.
Consequential Resolution
Consideration Stage of Bills --
Right to Information Bill, 2018. (Continuation)
Minerals Income Investment Fund Bill, 2018. (Continuation)
Committee Sittings.

Statements --

Motions --

(a) Third Reading of Bills --

Minerals Income Investment Fund Bill, 2018.

(b) Adoption of the Report of the Finance Committee on the Financing Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank Group for an amount of twenty-seven million, nine hundred thousand Special Drawing Rights (SDR27,900,000.00) [equivalent to US$40 million] to finance the proposed Tourism Development Project.

Consequential Resolution

(c) Adoption of the Report of the Finance Committee on the Financing Agreement (Amended and Restated Financing Agreement) between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the International Development Asso- ciation (IDA) of the World Bank Group for an amount of thirty-four million, eight hundred thousand Special Drawing Rights (SDR34,800,000.00) [equivalent to

US$50 million] to finance the Ghana Commercial Agriculture Project

(GCAP).

Consequential Resolution

(d) Adoption of the Report of the Finance Committee on the request for waiver of Import Duties, Import VAT, Import NHIL, ECOWAS Levy, EXIM Levy, Special Import Levy amounting to the Ghana cedi equivalent of two million, eight hundred and seventy-two thousand, nine hundred and eighty-five United States dollars (US$2,872,985.00) on project materials and equipment to be imported in respect of the construction of advanced Research Center for Infectious Diseases at the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana, Legon.

Consequential Resolution

(e) Adoption of the Report of the Finance Committee on the Financing Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank Group for an amount of twenty-five million, two hundred and forty thousand Special Drawing Rights (SDR25, 240,000.00) [Equivalent to US$35 million] to finance the proposed Public Sector Reform for Results Project (PSRRP).

Consequential Resolution

(f) Adoption of the Report of the Finance Committee on the

Supplier's Credit Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the Federal Republic of Brazil for an amount of ninety-five million, four hundred and fifty thousand United States dollars (US$95,450,000.00) to finance the establishment and strengthening of Agricultural Mechanisation Service Centres (AMSECs).

Consequential Resolution

(g) Adoption of the Report of the Committee on Health on the Contract Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana (represented by the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana) and Shimizu Corporation of Japan for an amount of one billion, six hundred and eighty million, eight hundred and sixteen thousand Japanese Yen only (J/ Y1,680,816,000.00) for the construction of advanced Research Center for Infectious Diseases at the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana, Legon.

Consequential Resolution

Committee Sittings.

The House expected to adjourn Sine die.
Mr Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa 1:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I commend the Hon Majority Leader and Chairman of the Business Committee for the Business Statement for the week ending, Friday, 28th September,
2018.
Mr Speaker, the couching of item 1 (ii) 1:40 p.m.
“Receipt of communication in respect of H. E. the President's nomination of persons for appointment as Ministers and Deputy Ministers and conside- ration of same by the House.”
Mr Speaker, that has been presented as though the work of the Appointments Committee, of which I am a member of in this House, generally, in vetting H.E. the President's nominees it is just like a mere formality. As if this House is some rubber stamp that automatically, everybody presented to this House will be passed. This is because if you look at the last sentence, it says:
“This is to ensure that the Ministers assume their offices to oversee the preparation of the respective sector ministries' budgets to feed into the presentation of the national Budget in November 2018.”
Mr Speaker, this could have been qualified that ‘if approved'. Let us not create the impression as though this House is just a rubber stamp -- that is what I would want to convey.
Mr Speaker, there are a few other corrections that I wish to bring to the attention of the Hon Majority Leader.
Item 1. third paragraph, item numbered (i) on the first page reads: “The Report of the Committee on Report of the Committee”. There is some repetition; so if we can tidy it up. Furthermore, the numbering is problematic.
Mr Speaker, finally, still on that page, item numbered 2 (a) says 1:40 p.m.
“Rt Hon Speaker, you may read communications to the House if any is are available today.”
We are either using “is” or “are”. Mr Speaker, those are a few corrections to point out.
Mr Speaker, I thank you.
Mr Ras Mubarak 1:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I am very grateful.
Mr Speaker, I would wish to comment on the Business Statement, and in doing so, I would like to make reference to Order 56 (1). With your permission, I beg to read:
“Every Friday the Chairman of the Business Committee shall make a statement in the House of the business arranged for the suc- ceeding week, but where the first week of a Meeting commences on a day earlier than Friday, he shall make a statement of the business arranged for the remainder of the week, if possible on the day of the commencement of the Meeting''.
Mr Speaker, I am making reference to Order 56 (1) which talks about the fact that you would read the Business Statement on Friday except when we are meeting earlier than Friday, as in this case.
Mr Speaker, because it is an emergency situation, my suggestion in respect of Order 56 (1) is that perhaps, the Business Committee could be invited earlier than the day of the Meeting so that they could deliberate on the Business Statement in order to save the House from unnecessarily waiting on the Business Committee to finish its work.
This is a little suggestion in respect of Order 56 (1). The Business Committee may be invited a day or two before we meet so that we do not come to spend a lot of time waiting for the Business Committee to finish its work before the Business of the House commences.
Mr Speaker, I thank you.
Mr Kwame Governs Agbodza 1:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I thank you for the opportunity. I also thank the Hon Majority Leader and Chairman of the Business Committee for the Business Statement.
Mr Speaker, we responded to your call appropriately and I turned up here at 10.00 a.m. today. Unfortunately, for reasons including what my Hon Colleague who spoke before me said, we did not turn up on time. We were on holiday and so when we are told to come at 10.00 o'clock, I know the Rt Hon Speaker has been very diligent and was there on time.
I would again say this to my Hon Colleagues when they say we should be here at 10 o'clock, we should come at 10.00 o'clock; otherwise, we do not give the right direction to the country. Your notice in the public domain says we should be here at 10.00 o'clock this morning.
Some people were here at 10.00 o'clock. Hon Colleagues, when it is 10.00 o'clock, it is 10.00 o'clock. We should never make any excuse for this; the excuse is becoming too much.
Mr Speaker, I am also aware that you are very particular on something about Hon Members of Parliament, and you have taken enough steps to ensure that we are properly capacitated to do our work. But there is a thorny issue which is still running.
Mr Speaker, if I look at some of the things on the Business Statement, I wish I had a research assistant who can help me go through some of these things in a speedy way to aid my work. But the issues about the recruitment of our research assistants is still in abeyance. We have been told on countless occasions how those who qualify would be given letters on a certain Monday.
As we speak, they are still out there and we are almost halfway through the life of this Parliament but Hon Members of Parliament do not have research assistants. So I am putting it back to Leadership; we know you want us to have research assistants, when are we going to have our Research Assistants to aid us in some of the important works that this country would want us to do?
Mr Haruna Iddrisu 1:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I should thank you, the Hon Majority Leader and Hon Members. I believe our response to the Emergency Sitting demonstrates responsibility to our role as Hon Members of Parliament.
What I would implore my Hon Colleague to do is to coordinate well with sector Ministers, even though I would not pay royalties to the Hon Minister for Monitoring and Evaluation so that business, as articulated in the Business Statement does not suffer, that as and when we need to take a particular transaction, we are able to support him.
I believe that my Hon Chairman and the Hon Chairman of the Appointments Committee would note the appropriate referral and bearing in mind, that Budget is soon and the role of Ministers in supervising their ministries, we would meet collectively to take it.
So, I should state that we should get the Business Statement approved, but the Leader of Government Business must be in charge. Being in charge means we do not come and sit here and Mr Speaker would call an item and the Hon Leader is looking to his shoulders to find who comes to do the business.
Mr Speaker, I thank you.
Mr Speaker 1:50 p.m.
Hon Majority Leader?
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:50 p.m.
Mr Speaker, in response to the issue raised by the Hon Ablakwa.
I explained when I spoke to item numbered 1 (ii). I said that “if the House approves of them, then they would be required to fill in at those places”. I concede to the fact that once nominations are made, it cannot be taken for granted that Parliament definitely would approve of the nominees.
There is no automaticity, so I agree. If he were listening to me, I made that point. It looks like there were some omissions, so I paused and inserted that statement when I got there.
Mr Speaker, but suffice it to say that when I said “the nominees would be considered by the House”, consideration starts with the referral to the appropriate Committee. It is part of the consideration. So, when I say to you that the House would consider them, I mean just that.
For the avoidance of doubt, it is not to be implied that the House is automatically going to approve of them. The ensuing sentence is really a statement of the intendment. It is the intention behind the nomination and the House having to sit on these people early enough.
However, I took pains to explain that if the House approves of them, then they would be required to assume their office. We may not approve of them. If we do not, the President would have to start from ground zero again.
Mr Speaker, when I was the Minority Leader, I raised the same issue which has been raised by the Hon Ras Mubarak, that when we come to a recall of the House,
perhaps it should be necessary for the Business Committee to be summoned earlier, at least, one day ahead, to do the planning so that when we come we would not have difficulties.
This morning, I had serious difficulties. -- In fact, I was in my office yesterday night and I left around 9:30 p.m. Unfortunately, the Table Officer was bereaved so, we could not even have this behind-the-curtain consultation to draft the proposal before this morning.
So it is not for want of being meticulous but I take a cue from what the Hon Member has said. As I said, I have made his statement in this House before. Perhaps, we may have to craft it into the new Orders and provide ourselves with ample space so that when we programme to meet at 10:00 a.m. we indeed are able to meet.
Mr Speaker, the Hon Agbodza made two points. The first one had to do with what the Hon Ras Mubarak said. He repeated just what the Hon Ras Mubarak had said. I would want to say to him that repetition also unfortunately, prolongs the Sitting time -- [Laughter] -- So, he should take a cue from that.
Mr Speaker, I believe we have to bring the matter relating to Research Assistants to a definite conclusion. By the time we come, it ought to have been sorted out. By the time we finish with this Sitting, Parliament would have made that determination so that when we come back those of the Research Assistants who qualify would be in place.
Mr Speaker 1:50 p.m.
I thank you very much. I trust that tomorrow morning, we shall meet at 10.00 a.m, hoping that whatever were the momentary difficulties of today would have been resolved. We expect that we shall meet at 10:00 a.m. tomorrow.
Furthermore, with regard to the Research Assistants, I have directed that the letters should be brought right here and we shall see the bottom of that matter before we leave this Chamber. It is long overdue and that is not acceptable.
Hon Members, Statements.
In any case, the Hon Minister for Finance is here. To enable him go and see to other important matters of State, I will vary the order of Business and present these Papers before we come to Statements.
Therefore, Hon Members, at the Commencement of Public Business: Presentation of Papers; item numbered 4 (a) by the Hon Minister for Finance.
PAPERS 1:50 p.m.

rose
Mr Speaker 1:50 p.m.
Item numbered iv?
Yes, Hon Dr Akoto Osei?
Dr Anthony A. Osei 1:50 p.m.
Mr Speaker, this is a simple tax waiver and I do not believe that for tax waivers, we usually bring the Leadership of the Committees there. The contract will go to the Committee on Health but the tax waiver is purely financial.
Mr Speaker 2 p.m.
Then, that would be reserved for the Committee on Finance.
Referred to the Committee on Finance.
Mr Speaker 2 p.m.
Item numbered 4 (a) (iv)
By the Minister for Finance --
Contract Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana (represented by the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana) and Shimizu Corporation of Japan for an amount of one billion, six hundred and eighty million, eight hundred and sixteen thousand Japanese Yen only (J/Y1,680,816,000.00) for the Construction of Advanced Research Center for Infectious Diseases at the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana, Legon.
Referred to the Committee on Finance and Leadership of the Committee on Health.
By the Minister for Finance --
Financing Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the International Development Association (IDA) of the World Bank Group for an amount of twenty-five million, two hundred and forty thousand Special Drawing Rights (SDR25,240,000.00) [equivalent to US$35 million] to finance the proposed Public Sector Reform for Results Project (PSRRP).
Referred to the Committee on Finance.
Mr Speaker 2 p.m.
Hon Members, in view of the time and the nature of the Business before us, I direct that Sitting be held beyond the regular Siting hours.
Item numbered 4(vi) - Hon Minister for Finance.
By the Minister for Finance --
Supplier 's Credit Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the Federal Republic of Brazil for an amount of ninety-five million, four hundred and fifty thousand United States dollars (US$95,450,000.00) to finance the establishment and Strengthening of Agricultural Mechanisation Service Centres (AMSECs).
Referred to the Committee on Finance and the Leadership of the Committee on Food, Agriculture and Cocoa Affairs.
Mr Speaker 2 p.m.
Item numbered 4(b).
Mr Speaker 2 p.m.
Hon Members, we would go back to Statements.
There is a Statement by the Hon Majority Leader.
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I would want to submit an application to you in respect of item numbered 4(a)(v), which is a Financing Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and IDA for an amount to finance the proposed Public Sector Reform for Results Project. Could you add the Leadership of the Committee on Employment, Social Welfare and State Enterprises to that referral?
Mr Speaker 2 p.m.
The Leadership of the Committee on Employment, Social Welfare and State Enterprises is added accordingly.
Hon Majority Leader, please, your Statement.
STATEMENTS 2 p.m.

Majority Leader (Mr Osei Kyei- Mensah-Bonsu)(MP) 2 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I rise to make a Statement, indeed, a tribute to commemorate the departure of the Hon J.H Mensah, a former Minority Leader, Majority Leader and Senior Minister, that this House and country has ever beheld.
Mr Speaker, Hon Joseph Henry Mensah, known to most people simply as J. H. Mensah, was always more of a character than a person yet he was human; a conglomeration of a human specimen.
He spoke truth to power; provided a voice for generations of yesterday, today and tomorrow; and, on relevant occasions, delivered personal but sometimes embarrassing truths about living in our fast evolving culture, which only a Chinua Achebe could penetrate. The man was different in an indifferent world.
He was the architect who doubled up as a brick layer; a consultant-physician who was the nurse at the Out-Patient Department; the engineer who was the dirty-sleeved mechanic; the professor emeritus who was the basic-school pupil teacher; the industrialist subsistence farmer; the trawler-owner canoe fisherman; the manager-player; the one- man symphony-orchestra.
Mr Mahama, my middle school form three teacher, a Dagomba, was always ecstatic whenever Hon J.H. Mensah's
name was mentioned in any discussion. That was way back in 1969. He described Mr J.H. Mensah in palliative language. The little mind of a 12-year-old village boy was at the time, not programmed to absorb the phantasmagoria of the electioneering campaigns of those days.
Yet, the name registered firmly, especially, when my teacher spoke about the Seven-Year Development Plan that President Nkrumah had introduced to launch Ghana into the orbit of the industrialised world. Mr Mahama was most emphatic that the Plan was the hand work of the enigmatic J.H. Mensah, as if at the time of the smithing of the document, he acted as the usher of Hon J.H. Mensah.
In 1978, Mr Akwasi Agyemang, a Bremang-born senior to me by age but my junior at the elementary school became the personal driver of Mr J.H. Mensah and he, Mr Agyemang, so much eulogised him that a person listening to the young driver would have concluded that he was unveiling an extra-terrestrial being.
Mr Agyemang became a driver in Parliament and preceded Hon J.H. Mensah to the greater beyond two years before Hon J.H Mensah transitioned.
My first physical encounter with Hon J.H. Mensah was late 1996 after his return from exile, to link up with the newly-born New Patriotic Party (NPP). He had visited the Ashanti regional headquarters of the party. He encouraged us in the office to work hard.
In 1996, when the NPP for the first time participated in the parliamentary elections of the Fourth Republic, the party won 61 seats out of the 200 seats that existed at the time.
Assembling the MPs-elect, the then Chairman of the party, Mr Peter Ala
Majority Leader (Mr Osei Kyei- Mensah-Bonsu)(MP) 2:10 p.m.
Adjetey as he then was declared that the party had chosen Hon J.H. Mensah as the leader of the parliamentary group to be deputised by Hon Gladys Asmah, and assisted by Hon S.K. Boafo and Hon I.C. Quaye as Chief Whip and Deputy Whip respectively.
Hon J. H. Mensah, as the opposition leader, indeed led the caucus of the Minority. He was extremely brilliant; had monumental energy; and unparalleled integrity -- not a philistine politician. He was a generalist who knew not a little, but very much about every subject matter: economics, finance, law, science and technology, agriculture, education, health, environment, music and the arts.

That was why he was such an astute and consummate debator in Parliament. In his use of the Queen's language, he displayed balance, symmetry and smoothness. He had absolute mastery. Listening to him was always a joy.

He could sustain the attention of all of us for very long periods not only because of the facts and figures that he churned out and his attention to details but also because of the poise and counterpoise and the ease with which he welded several scenes and acts together into a detachable yet a complete whole.

In his winding up for his side on the 1999 Message on the State of the Nation Address J. H. Mensah spoke for two hours and the MPs listened with strained ears. Not a word would be allowed to fall to the ground.

In Parliament, J.H. Mensah offered gratuitous lessons in iambic pentameter when other contenders struggled with

simple prose. Whenever he delivered submissions on the President's State of the Nation Address or the Budget, he was surgical and the applauses that followed were not contrived but well earned from the Generals, Brigadiers, Colonels and Majors that he led.

January 1997 was a melodramatic month, J.H. Mensah led the national resistance movement to confront three anachronisms. First, the wish of the President at the time to have himself sworn-into office where he (the President) had declared. Hon J.H.'s position was that the President ‘‘must be sworn in Parliament, before Parliament”.

The Hon J.H. Owusu Acheampong the Majority Leader at the time, counter argued that Parliament could sit “under a mango tree at Damango''. Hon Owusu Acheampong “won” the day but it was only when the Speaker at the time, Justice Daniel Francis Annan had pronounced that Parliament “would move up to convene at the Black Star Square”. That was on January 7, 1997. Technically, J.H. Mensah had won the debate.

Same January 1997 H.E. Jerry John Rawlings had declared that his ministers from 1993-1996 were simply to continue in office and crossover to join the second stanza of the Rawlings' hymnal. J.H. Mensah led his army to resist that attempt to what he considered as a subvert of the Constitution, as he insisted that there cannot be any such qualification as “holdover Ministers”, and that all persons that President Rawlings wanted to have as ministers in his second term, should submit themselves to the new Parliament to be vetted.

After some haranguing, the matter went to court. The Supreme Court then ruled that prior approval of such nominees was required from Parliament. Mr Speaker, that

is how come today into the second term of our continuing Presidents, Parliament has had the privilege of vetting holdover or continuing ministers, because their term ceases with that of the President.

Item number 3: The First State of the Nation Address by H.E. President Rawlings, in the Second Parliament. On the penultimate day, Parliament had been festooned in the colours of the NDC.

The Minority Leader at the time, registered his pointed objection and insisted that Parliament is the National Assembly of the Republic and not an appendage of any particular party and registered that if the NDC colours were not pulled down, the NPP and other minority parties were not going to be part of the President's Address.

The day of reckoning came and the decorative ribbons and balloons in the NDC colours had all been pulled down overnight. Such was the strength of character and resilience of the slightly- built man from Sunyani.

Passing by his office one day, Mr Speaker, I observed a frustrated man, murmuring to himself. He had assigned responsibility to one of the members in leadership at that time and that person had disappointed him. Upon enquiry, he told me of his request. I submitted a write-up to him on the subject matter the following morning. Reading it, he crossed out several words and sentences.

I rewrote the five-page document. Fewer, but all the same, many cancellations again! I did a third edition and he congratulated me for that effort. That marked the genesis of my close association with the venerable personality. A second, a third and other referrals to me followed. Fewer cancellations followed.

One day I submitted proposals which I had titled, Caucus Rules, having observed some mannerisms from some Colleague MPs whenever we attended caucus meetings as well as the conduct of some Hon Members who were given to mere show-boating, not real subsustance.

The Leader, after perusing it, asked me to confer with the caucus spokesperson on Constitutional and Legal Affairs at the time, Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo. That is how come the NPP's Caucus Rules came to be written and adopted.

Hon J.H. Mensah, the Parliamentary Leader was a workaholic. On many occasions he worked overnight. At about 9.00 pm on such occasions he would request me to go home and have some rest and come early morning to relieve him. At 7.00 a.m. I would be back, he would still be sitting, back bent, coffee, biscuit and some wine and still writing.

“You are back”, he would intone. “Find yourself somewhere to sit, I would try to be back at 9.30 a.m.” His brown eyes however, betrayed his lack of proper rest but he did not apparently care too much about his health. Parliament, and later his work at the Ministry occupied him. Clearly, however, there was not much joy for him after Parliament and after office and that paradoxically, fast cascaded his health downhill. The enigmatic figure was stumbling!

I observed and studied the man called Hon J.H. Mensah and the lessons learnt have served me well in my various roles in leadership of the party, especially, as Minority Leader for eight years and now as Majority Leader.

Two regrets I have. If molecular scientific morphism and morphogenesis had advanced sufficiently enough, perhaps we could have cloned a J.H.
Mr Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Hon Members, before the Hon Minority Leader comes in, I wish to bring to your notice that I am well advised that 122 qualified applicants are ready. I have asked the Clerk to Parliament to ensure that he signs those letters, so Hon Members may move to the Office of the Clerk to Parliament and collect them accordingly. Those who have not brought their applicants should do so since the position of a Research Assistant is very important for parliamentary work.
While the Hon Minority Leader continues, the Hon First Deputy Speaker would take the Chair.
Mr Haruna Iddrisu 2:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I wanted to make an application that given the stature and standing of Hon J. H. Mensah, if you could accommodate two or three Hon Members from each Side, after which I could then conclude on the Statement by the Hon Majority Leader to eulogise him.
Mr Speaker 2:10 p.m.
It does not exclude other Hon Members, but because the Hon Majority Leader has spoken, you may contribute and then other Hon Members would contribute.
It is not to the exclusion of others that I called you, but if you prefer to contribute later -- it is not as though you are concluding.
Mr Iddrisu 2:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I prefer to wind up after I have listened to other Hon Members.
Mr Speaker 2:10 p.m.
All right.
Hon Pelpuo.
MR FIRST DEPUTY SPEAKER
Alhaji (Dr) Abdul-Rashid Hassan Pelpuo (NDC -- Wa Central) 2:34 p.m.
Mr Speaker, thank you.
Mr Speaker, it was William Shakespeare who said that “the world is a stage, and all the men and women merely players. They have their entrance and exit and each man at his time plays many parts”.
In the life of this great man that we are eulogising and celebrating today, he played many parts as a government official, a father, a friend and as a mentor to many Ghanaians that he came across
during his life. Mr Speaker, very early before our Independence, as a smart intelligent man, we read about his going to study outside the country, came back to Ghana and worked in various positions, including the United Nations.
He distinguished himself everywhere he went, to the point that the President at the time saw him to be a key supporter of his government and drafted him into his Seven-Year Development Plan which was drawn for the country at that time.
Mr Speaker, this was a young man who was barely 30 years old at the time, but because of the quality of life that he lived, he was trusted and given a huge responsibility. It was not surprising that at a very tender age of about 31 years, he became an Minister for Finance in this country.
To date, this appears to be a record and it is very unlikely that we would see a young person at the age of 31 years who would assume such a huge responsibility. Mr Speaker, this is the man we have lost; a man who devoted his life, from the very first day he left school and arrived on the shores of Ghana, to the service of his fatherland and to the service of the people around him.
Mr Speaker, some of us met Hon J. H. Mensah here. He first entered Parliament in 1969 and had since been on and off until we finished school. As a young person, we admired him from outside and came to Parliament to see him debate on the Floor of the House.
Mr Speaker, his quality of debate, his insistence on the things he believed in, his ability to weave around subject matters which were quite outside his area of expertise was very admirable. He was a
man whom everybody respected, including the Majority Side at the time. He was a man who was also liked by the Rt Hon Speaker then, and he could say anything within the boundaries of --
Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:34 p.m.
Hon Members, there is too much noise in the Chamber. Please order.
Alhaji (Dr) Pelpuo 2:34 p.m.
Mr Speaker, he could take any subject matter and debate it. I do agree with the Hon Majority Leader when he talked about the Hon J. H. Mensah speaking on every subject of his choice with a lot of vim and input which shows that he was a person who was distinct in the approach of the subject that he was discussing.
In fact, he was an expert in everything that he said. He was a great debater and could make people feel as if they were not part of what was happening because you would feel a little more inferior to the quality and personality that he exuded.
Mr Speaker, this man was inter- generational in his outlook; he came from a generation that many of us never saw; a generation before Independence. A period which was controlled by an external colonial power that trained him, but he rose above the training they gave him. He refused to be a colonial subject and into our Independence he became a different person altogether.
Indeed, he moved until he reached the 21st Century. This is the man that we are celebrating and we have to write about his quality of life. These are the characters who inspire people even without speaking; these are characters whose life examples become a thread that would allow people to reach a certain level of their potentials because they led exemplary lives, they showed the way and showed distinction in whatever they did across the political divide.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:30 p.m.
Hon Minister for Finance.

Hon Minister for Finance (Mr Ken Ofori-Atta): Mr Speaker, thank you very much for this opportunity.

It is really with a heavy heart to find out that Hon J. H. Mensah is gone. Mr Speaker, in 1969, I am not sure how old I was, but my father was Hon J. H. Mensah's deputy. Therefore, I got to walk the corridors of the Ministry of Finance from 1969 through to 1972. I remember how affable and welcoming he was -- predicting that some of us may be doing the job that he was doing and we just laughed it off.

Mr Speaker, as you know, Hon J. H. Mensah is famed to have written the Seven-Year Development Plan and he joined the Progress Party. In 1969, he was in Parliament, and as we went through at that time, we recall the first attempt of structural development of our economy in a very capitalist mode.

One time, coming from the World Bank, he was aligning his previous beliefs to this new one. He said, at that time, he was a progressive socialist. That was how he justified the way in which he worked.

Mr Speaker, J. H. Mensah was also known for working tirelessly, and he was therefore alleged to have a bed in the office. So, when I was honoured with that position, I went looking for the bed, and the bed was nowhere to be found. However, you could see why he needed a bed. Many times, we have had to sleep on the carpet in the office, especially before we come to this House with our Budget Statements.

What he has left is something that the nation and all of us really admired. We wish him well. He has left a huge footprint that would be difficult to equal.

I thank you for the opportunity.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:30 p.m.
Hon Minority Chief Whip?
Alhaji Mohammed-Mubarak Muntaka (NDC -- Asawase) 2:40 p.m.
Thank you, Mr Speaker.
Mr Speaker, with a heavy heart, I rise to contribute to the eulogy of this great Member of Parliament and former Colleague. By every standard, I believe that he had contributed his quota to the development of this country.
Mr Speaker, I had a great privilege of meeting Hon J. H. Mensah in Parliament while he was doing his last term in this House. That was when I was also doing my first term in Parliament. If I would summarise what I made of him, I would say that he was a very great debater, courageous and diligent person.
Nevertheless, I would also add that he moved on to mentor a lot of people. One that I know very well, that if you see how he works then you remember Hon J. H. Mensah, is no other person than the Hon Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu, the Hon Majority Leader. If you see the way the Hon Majority Leader works, especially when it comes to the consideration of Bills and law making, it makes one directly remember the Hon J. H. Mensah.
Mr Speaker, I must admit; between the time some of us came here and now, whether the blame should be put on those of us who have the great privilege of being in leadership today or it is the system we are running, every one of us today in this chamber would admit that the quality of debate has gone down drastically.

Yes, it is very bad. Mr Speaker, I believe it is because people do not research enough. People are not given enough time and they are rushed to end their contributions.

Mr Speaker, there was a time that the Hon J. H. Mensah was speaking. At the time, we did not have offices and we used to eat somewhere around the head office of the ARB Apex Bank. We left the

Chamber, went to order the food, sat there and ate the food; came back and he was still on his feet. I dare say that today, there is no way one would be tolerated that much.

Mr Speaker, when he enters the Chamber and you see the reference materials around him, even with all the knowledge that he had you would marvel.

Mr Speaker, today, an Hon Member would get up to contribute, and he or she is given three minutes to talk. How can any other person in the Chamber as a first timer learn from the experienced ones?

This was the time that when Hon J. H. Mensah was speaking, one would be copiously jotting down some of the things that he was saying. This is because, even when a person disagrees with him, you would respect and believe what he was saying made a lot of sense.

Today, is it the way our parties conduct ourselves in our various constituencies or is it the so much monetisation of our political parties that makes many of us in the Chamber not find time to even sit up to two hours in the Chamber? People come in, just sit briefly and walk out again.

Virtually, they do not learn anything. But this is the biggest university that one would attend because the archaeology to zoology of this country runs through this House. By just sitting in this House and listening to things that happen here means that one would learn greatly.

Many of us who have learnt to sit in the Chamber learnt it from those times because you would come and see the senior colleagues glued to their seats, with debate ongoing and you would hear constructive argument. Even when a person disagreed, it was done so decently.

Today, with the greatest of respect, we have turned the Chamber into a place where we do petty politicking to the extent that we are virtually leaving national interest aside.

Mr Speaker, it was through the effort of the Hon J. H. Mensah that the Minority begun to shape how they conducted themselves in the Chamber; the kind of courage and force that they had to put to challenge the Majority. It was through the leadership of the Hon J. H. Mensah that the Minority had this boldness.

This is because, until then, our country had even forgotten how our last Parliament was behaving. But when he came in, in the year 1997 and led the Minority, he had the effort of going to the court where things were not very clear. In fact, he believed in going to the court for settlement.

Today, we virtually resort to shouting and pushing to get things settled. At least, when it happens again, we would all say that when it happened, this was how it was resolved. Now, we have turned it into saying, ‘‘when you were here, you did it and when we were there, we did it.” We are not really moving our democracy to where it should go.

Mr Speaker, I must admit that Hon J. H. Mensah was really an illustrious son of this country.

Mr Speaker, on our recent trip as Leadership, I kept reminding the two leaders, of the Minority and Majority, that we need to take steps to start naming very prominent Members of Parliament and people who have served this House with committee rooms. This is because, when you go to all the well-established Parliaments, their committee rooms are

named after illustrious persons who have done so well for their country.

Mr Speaker, I do not see anything wrong if we decide to name the Administration Block where we house our Clerk to Parliament and most of the officers after the Late Peter Ala Adjetey. I do not see anything wrong in naming the Job 600 Tower Block after Hon D. F. Annan, and I do not see anything wrong naming most of the committee rooms after the likes of the Hon J. H. Mensah, Hon J. H. Owusu Acheampong and those who have served this House well.

Mr Speaker, if those of us today do not learn to remember these illustrious sons of this country very well, the truth is that we would never be remembered for anything good that we have also done. In many parliaments, even their chambers are named after Members of Parliament who really served. If you go to the United States, almost all the blocks are named after senators or congressmen who have really excelled in their work in the House.

Other than that, we must not expect that no matter the effort that we put in whether as Speaker or Majority Leader or a Member in running this House, we would ever be remembered because these men and women that we are mentioning today really served this House very well, and we need to put their names somewhere so that people who would come even 50 years after now would be asking why these names, and then that would make them understand the contributions they made in this House.

Hon J.H. Mensah has really paid his due. I am not surprised he is an October born, because October borns are courageous. They can say it regardless of the consequences. In fact, I was here and saw Hon J.H. Mensah.
Mr Eugene Boakye Antwi (NPP-- Subin) 2:40 p.m.
Thank you, Mr Speaker.
After his academic pursuit, having worked with the United Nations, J.H. Mensah migrated to Ghana in the mid- fifties to assist President Nkrumah with the Seven-Year Development Plan, which was single-handedly authored by him and which has been hailed by succeeding generations, when he was barely 27 years of age, the mark of a great economic icon.
I first came into contact with J.H. Mensah in the early 1990s in the United Kingdom (UK), in our struggle to return our dear country to democratic rule. He struck me as a man with varied hinterland.
During the formative years of the NPP UK branch, J.H. Mensah was at the forefront of returning our country to democratic rule after a decade of authoritarian PNDC rule. The ferocity of his intellectual debates, speeches and letters was a clear manifestation of a courageous fearless patriot, whose patriotism was matchless in the UK in the early 1990s.
He became the first NPP-UK chairman, with Dr Owusu Afriyie Akoto, former MP for Kwadaso and the current Minister for Agriculture as his able secretary. He
Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:40 p.m.
Hon Leader, are you ready to conclude?
Yes, Hon Quashigah?
Mr Richard M.K.Quashigah (NDC-- Keta) 2:50 p.m.
Thank you Mr Speaker, and I am grateful to the Hon Minority Leader for giving me the opportunity.
Mr Speaker, indeed, the man being talked about was a great man with a
creative blend of mind, and in no doubt a great intellectual. He obviously imparted our nation in diverse ways, leaving footprints in the sands of time.
I do recall as a young journalist, then in the press gallery here in Parliament, witnessing this man talk, mesmerising not just his colleague Members of Parliament but even the journalists in the press gallery, and indeed we looked at him at the time as one with a great difference.
There is no doubt that he was a rare gem, and as has been described by others, indeed he carried himself very courageously. He was determined to resist whatever he was convinced was not right or did not go down well with him.
At least things that we have read about him during the political journey of this nation, including resistance movements all, attest to the fact that he was indeed a courageous and brave man, probably a man who was ready to lay down his life for his conviction.
I am very convinced that were he alive today, he would have been speaking against the decadence that we are witnessing in our society in relation to governance and policies that are probably not human friendly, which obviously are impoverishing the many already impoverished Ghanaian people.
I am very convinced that if Hon J.H.Mensah were alive today, even though he belonged to a certain political divide, he would have risen up to speak against what we would have considered as the ills within the administration and the governance of that political party.

So today, our remembering and eulogising him, I believe that it ought to be done with all sincerity. Sincerely, he

was a great man, and in truth, he was a man of great intelligence, very deep in thought and very mature.

From what I understood from some Hon Members of Parliament who were around during his time, or who worked with him, he was one who tried to be fair to all, whether a person was in the Minority or the Majority. Considering the fact that he had his way in this House, even in Government, he also believed that others should have their way.

So he was a true democrat; he was not a pretentious democrat who would want to, as it were, play to the gallery when he had the wheels of governance under his control. So indeed, we are remembering a great man. I believe he is one that we ought to emulate. As was mentioned by an Hon Member who spoke earlier, we should pray that there would be many more J. H. Mensahs just like the Dr Kwame Nkrumahs et cetera in the future in Ghana.

Mr Speaker, for these few words, I thank you for the opportunity.

First Deputy Speaker: Yes, Hon Minister for Local Government and Rural Development?
Minister for Local Government and Rural Development (Hajia Alima Mahama) (MP) 2:50 p.m.
Thank you, Mr Speaker. I also rise to add my voice to the eulogy of our illustrious son. Mr J.H. Mensah was indeed an illustrious son of Ghana, smart, intelligent and knowledgeable. I was glad to be in the Fourth Parliament of the Republic with him, and he was awesome to relate to and you would be glad to relate to him.
Mr Speaker, J. H. Mensah, on a personal level, had a listening ear. Anybody who
would walk up to him to discuss an issue, he was prepared to listen and to provide an objective advice; an advice that a person would sleep on and be happy that he or she talked to him. As everybody has talked about him here, anytime he rose up to speak, he was an inspiration -- we were then ninos in Parliament.
The whole Chamber silently listened anytime Mr J. H. Mensah got up to speak, and we listened with rapt attention because he gave knowledge. He researched, as was indicated and he was very knowledgeable on the matter. He would talk about an engineering topic as if it was a finance topic. He was able to relate to any subject. I believe he did a lot of research before coming into Parliament.
Mr Speaker, one thing I remember very well, and I would like to reiterate is, Mr J. H. Mensah asked parliamentarians to uphold and defend the integrity of Parliament. He also talked about parliamentarians seeing Parliament as a body, and therefore work to defend its cause.
So, whether we were on the Minority or the Majority Side, he entreated us to see parliamentary work as our business and therefore uphold and defend it.
Mr Speaker, on a personal level, he used to speak Hausa to me. Everybody knew that Mr J.H. Mensah was mul- tilingual; he would meet a Ga and speak Ga; he would meet an Akan and speak Twi, and when he met me, he would speak Hausa to me. That showed that he related to everybody and shared his life with everybody.
I believe his family should see his passing as a celebration of the life of this legendary illustrious son of Ghana. Let us celebrate his life, indeed, both Sides are all saying good things about him. Infact, I

have not heard anyone say any negative thing about Mr J. H. Mensah. If it is negative, it would be something petty. I am glad I knew Mr J. H. Mensah and I wish him a peaceful rest in the bosom of our God.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Yes, Hon Majority Chief Whip?
Mr Kwasi Ameyaw-Cheremeh (NPP -- Sunyani East) 3 a.m.
Thank you, Mr Speaker. Hon Joseph Henry Kweku Abbew Mensah was born on the 31st October, 1928 in Sekondi. He was educated at St. Peter's Cathedral Primary School in Kumasi between 1934 and 1941, and also at Achimota College between the years 1942 and 1947. He entered the University College of the Gold Coast at Legon in 1948.
Mr Speaker, he was further educated at the London School of Economics in 1954 and also at the Stanford University in California between 1956 and 1957.
Mr Speaker, the late Joseph Henry Mensah, popularly called J. H. Mensah was a household name when some of us were growing up. He is noted to have played a key role in the formulation of the Seven-Year Development Plan of the First Republic under the former President, Dr Kwame Nkrumah. He was a Member of Parliament for Sunyani Constituency.
In those days, there was no Sunyani East and Sunyani West, it was just Sunyani Constituency. He was appointed the Minister for Finance in the Second Republic, under the leadership of Professor Kofi Abrefa Busia, between 1969 and 1972. Indeed, many of us, the youth of those times relished the opportunity to behold him one day.
Eventually, Mr Speaker, the opportunity beckoned when he returned from abroad to contest for the parliamentary seat on the ticket of the NPP for Sunyani Constituency in 1996. That opportunity offered us, a core of young politicians in the Brong Ahafo Region, the chance to learn practical lessons in politics under his feet. He was candid and straightforward in his political messages.
Mr Speaker, it goes without saying that, Hon J.H. Mensah won the parlia- mentary contest in 1996, entered Parliament in January, 1997, and had the real privilege to lead the then Minority in Parliament.
As a Minority Leader, the nation will continue to remember him for his passion, selflessness and commitment to duty.
Undoubtedly, his hard work and that of the Minority at the time contributed immensely to the victory of the NPP in the 2000 General Election, which brought President John Agyekum Kufuor to power.

Mr Speaker, it did not come as a surprise to some of us when he became the Majority Leader and Leader of Government Business in Parliament in

2001.

Mr Speaker, it is recalled with fond memories the sterling qualities he exhibited in parliamentary leadership and debate, and the unifying role he played to calm rising tempers in the Chamber of the House. Indeed, there is living testimony to the fact that the House looked up to him for guidance almost all the time.

He commanded the respect, confi- dence and the trust of the whole House. This is how a former Hon Member of Parliament puts it to me.

Mr Speaker, the late Hon J. H. Mensah was later appointed a Senior Minister, the first of its kind in former President Kufour's Government. The many useful roles he played in the areas of public sector reforms and national development planning cannot be lost on us.

The late Hon J. H. Mensah had a great sense of humour. He could use humour to drum home a point without missing the relevance of what he was putting across.

Mr Speaker, at an NPP Annual Conference in Koforidua in 2007, for instance, he cautioned the then presidential aspirants of the party to do a self-assessment before putting them- selves up, and this is how he put it: “checke wo ho”.

He also advised against people who touted themselves as being more handsome or beautiful than others in the race to desist from it because the race was not a beauty contest. Such was the man J. H. Mensah. He could use humorous statements to tone down tension or make a difficult situation look very simple.

Mr Speaker, the late J.H. Mensah con- tinued to offer invaluable counselling to the party and Government until his demise on 12th July, 2018. Even though he is no more, his works must live on. It is therefore important for Government and Parliament to immortalise him by compiling his works for the benefit of the present and future generations.

Mr Speaker, the late Hon J. H. Mensah served the country well in various capacities as a researcher, public servant, diplomat, politician and statesman, and we need to acknowledge him for all the things that he did for the betterment of Ghana.

May he rest peacefully in the bosom of Abraham.

Fare thee well J. H. Mensah.

Damirifa due! Due ne amanehunu.

I am most grateful, Mr Speaker.
Minority Leader (Mr Haruna Iddrisu) 3 a.m.
Mr Speaker, let me thank you for the opportunity to contribute to the tribute and eulogy of one of the respected Ghanaian political icons and politician, Joseph Henry Mensah, ably read by no mean a person than the Hon Majority Leader.
Mr Speaker, as we pay tribute to him, one of the many lessons -- [Inter- ruption] I am sure my Hon Colleague, the Hon Majority Leader, is trying his utmost best to attempt to be and to fit into the shoes of the late Joseph Henry Mensah. At least, in terms of hard work, and being meticulous. I can say that the late J. H. Mensah can rest in his bosom; at least, he has trained many, including our current Hon Majority Leader.
I entered Parliament in 2005 and I still can picture him occupy the seat here. Mr Speaker, that forever he would be remembered for. He had the rare gift of God on thinking right on his feet momentarily. So, it is not just a matter of rising and talking and thinking, but thinking right momentarily on his feet. It is the most distinguishing feature that God gifted the late J. H. Mensah.
Mr Speaker, he has made tremendous contributions to the political, social and economic development of our country. One would recall his role in the 1962-1969 Development Plan and working with former President Nkrumah to transform the country Ghana, and I dare add, Mr Speaker,
Mr Speaker, he added this 3 a.m.
“If you so rule, then we can have some peace from these dangerous gadgets that are flying around. I know I would be accused of living in the 19th century, but I still maintain that it is fairly unparliamentary.”
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3 a.m.
And what was the ruling of Mr Speaker at the time?
Mr Iddrisu 3 a.m.
Mr Speaker, since I am not eulogising the Speaker, I am interested in what the late J.H. Mensah said. [Laughter.]
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:10 p.m.
Because you appear to have moved that the application was approved, I do not know that.
Mr Iddrisu 3:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I can understand. For those who would be interested, they would go further, but for my purpose today, it is to remember the late J. H. Mensah.
Mr Speaker, I come to a quote of his depth. He was a profoundly brilliant economist and the lessons to learn [Interruption]. Mr Speaker, this is what he had to say. I refer to the Hansard of 16th March, 2001.
“Mr Speaker, this failure to address the structure of the economy, this contentment to live with an economy based still on unprocessed products, based still on a cocoa manufac- turing industry which is just about taking off, based still on a huge export of rough-cut lumber -- we were arguing about tax rates on lumber the other day -- this economy based on not even being able to make a jewellery industry in this country which is competitive in the export market, is a signal failure.”
Mr Speaker, the Ghanaian economy since his life to death has not changed significantly. We must challenge, commit and rededicate ourselves to the proper transformation of the Ghanaian economy.
Today, when I see us all playing politics with the depreciation of the cedi -- what we may describe as its epileptic fall, is because in my view, we have not transformed the structure of the economy. Also, we are not working to expand
exports as a country, we are still importing hugely and we pretend to manage the Ghanaian economy well.
Mr Speaker, now to Parliament, and that would be my conclusion. As a political icon, the late J. H. Mensah was noted for defending his convictions. He belonged to one of a few politicians whom I agreed with, that values are timeless. One cannot have a principle and say in the morning, I do not have it, in the evening, I do not have it, and on the next day, in the morning, I do not have it.
Today, if the late J. H. Mensah were alive -- I recall on the Floor of this House, he made a profound statement. He said, when we say “free”, there is nothing free. Today, we are talking about free Senior High School. Its consequence and cost is the tracking of the education system; that comes at a cost. There is nothing free.
The opportunity cost of resources going into other sectors of the economy is a cost to Ghana. That was the concept the late J. H. Mensah espoused at the time. It is still relevant today. When we think that Ghana can engage in something free, it would come at an economic cost.

Today, it is not about improving the lot of the Ghanaian, it is about which party has the Majority or Minority and which party has its way. No, the citizens of this country have aspirations.

I think it is only fair that this House acknowledges the contributions of the late Justice D. F. Annan and the late Peter Ala Adjetey as former Speakers of Parliament and former leaders, including J. H. Mensah posthumously.

We should name a dedicated structure in this Parliament in their memory. I have said it publicly. I recall even when Job 600 was to be commissioned, I whispered that it should be dedicated to the late Justice D. F. Annan.

We could name the New Office Block where the Clerk to Parliament and his staff sit or even this Chamber. We can name it as J. H. Mensah Chamber. At least, if for nothing, he moved from Majority Leader to Minority Leader. The only persons who have equalled him would not want to die now, and I do not wish so, are the Hon Majority Leader and Hon Alban Bagbin.

I disagree with the late J. H. Mensah and Hon Majority Leader, Hon Kyei- Mensah-Bonsu in their politics, but I would not take hard work from them. The Hon Majority Leader is meticulous in his reading, especially when he wants to go on the lines. If it is a value that he learnt from the late J. H. Mensah, he can rest peacefully.

In my tribute, I said that Ghana's Parliament might struggle to have someone like the late J. H. Mensah. This is because God in His inherent wisdom, would not give you everything. He was brilliant and an orator.
Mr Iddrisu 3:20 p.m.


As I said, one of the things I admired about him was his ability to think right momentarily. Not all of us rise here and think right and we rise just to --

I have been in Government and have served for, at least, eight consistent years as a Minister. Members of the ruling Government rarely, sparingly and hesitantly would want to be critical of the President and the ruling Government's policies. We would do it because I do not fear reshuffle and I need not be reshuffled.

Therefore, the opportunity which was given to the late J. H. Mensah -- [Interruption.] These days, when you rise, you are told that the Hon Minority Leader has only three, five or ten minutes. It is not helping parliamentary democracy in this country. This is not just for my sake as Haruna because I do not aspire to remain here, but every other Minority Leader must be given enough political space.

This is because the very architecture of the 1992 Constitution -- the people of Ghana, the deprived -- If today, President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo and his Ministers are engaged in policy, even businesses would want to whisper to those who might make an articulation on their behalf.

Mr Speaker, on that note, our deepest sympathy and condolence goes to the bereaved family. As we accompany Mr Speaker and Leadership to his house, may

all of us learn lessons. It is not that which we cherish and dream of that we attain.

One of the rare things the late J. H. Mensah wanted to be was Speaker of Parliament. God did not give him the opportunity to live long. [Interruption.] I went to his home when he passed on and I listened to members of his family, not on the road to Koforidua but at East Legon.

Mr Speaker, I would want to thank the Hon Majority Leader. I think that the State gave him a befitting funeral. Mr Speaker, on this occasion, there is a Parliamentary Board meeting that the Hon Majority Leader and I would be part of. We should take a decision. All the monuments in Parliament should be named after people who have served this Parliament.

Whether we like it or not, the late Peter Ala Adjetey made a significant contribution to the way we do business in this House. We cannot take away the nurturing of our democracy from the late Justice D. F. Annan. He did his part. Whether it is in the United States (U.S.) Congress or some travel abroad, you would see the names.

Mr Speaker, do you see the man is enjoying his Senior Deputy Minister appointment?

I want to thank the Hon Majority Leader, and I think the late Hon J. H. Mensah was undoubtedly a political icon of our time, a national hero and must be recognised for his contribution to our political and social development.

This Parliament must name something significant in his memory to eulogise him.

To Members of Parliament (MP's) let us respect each other. When you go on radio and trade and sell me at one pesewa, I would be bought at a penny, but tomorrow, you would be bought at a penny. These are lessons we must learn.

We can disagree. I do not need to think like any person in the ruling New Patriotic Party, but whether they would get it right or wrong, in four or eight years, there would be political accountability time -- [Interruption.] -- Hon Eugune Boakye Antwi, do you have money to do housing? [Laughter]

Mr Speaker, on this note, I would want to thank the Hon Majority Leader and trust that, at least, we pray that the country someday would be able to produce another J. H. Mensah. That is not to recognise that the Hon Majority Leader is not doing his best, but as I said, God created every person unique in his own respect and right.

May the late J. H. Mensah rest in perfect peace.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:20 p.m.
Hon Members, this is one of the rare eulogies we could give to a statesman like the late J. H. Mensah.
Just to observe that when it comes to time for debating, I do not see the Hon Minority Leader gagged at all. However, whenever there are times agreed, it is agreed between the Hon Leaders at pre- meetings before the Hon Speaker enforces it. So, the Hon Leaders should agree that they should be allowed as much time as
they want and the Hon Speaker would enforce it.
I would want to invite the House to observe a minute's silence in honour of the late J. H. Mensah.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:20 p.m.
May the soul of our illustrious J. H. Mensah and the soul of all the faithfully departed rest in eternal peace.
Hon Members, we are at the Commencement of Public Business.
Hon Majority Leader?
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 3:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I believe you are announcing our re-entry into Public Business. This is because we have already done some Publ ic Business, the Presentation of Papers and you yourself laid the Papers on behalf of the --
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:20 p.m.
Very well.
Are we ready to do item numbered 5?
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 3:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I really wanted us to just start with the opening clauses -- maybe, clauses 1 and 2, to set us off on that key and we could adjourn thereafter. So, let us begin with the Minerals Income Investment Fund Bill.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:20 p.m.
Hon Minority Leader, the Hon Majority Leader has suggested that we start with item numbered 5, and I would want to know your take on it.
Mr Haruna 3:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, since it is a recall, it is only appropriate that we are seen working and doing what is appropriate, except that as you are aware, there is a Parliamentary Board Meeting convened by the Rt Hon Speaker, so we
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:20 p.m.
Very well.
The Minerals Income Investment Fund Bill, 2018 at the Consideration Stage.
Yes, Hon Majority Leader?
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 3:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, just for the avoidance of doubt and indeed, for the record, I said we could do clause 1 or perhaps, clauses 1 and 2. I did not add clause 3. The Hon Minority Leader, was just imagining that perhaps, we would do clauses 4 and 5. I said we would do clause 1 or clauses 1 and 2.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:20 p.m.
Probably, somebody has been bitten once and he is twice shy.
BILLS -- CONSIDERATION STAGE 3:20 p.m.

Chairman of the Committee (Dr Mark Assibey-Yeboah) 3:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I beg to move, clause 1, subclause (4), line 3, delete “Authority” and insert “Fund”.
Mr Speaker, it was a typographical error. It should be ‘'Fund'' and not ‘'Authority''.
rose
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Yes, Hon Ranking Member for Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee?
Alhaji I.A.B. Fuseini 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, clause 1 subclause (1) is simple. I proposed that we delete ‘'a fund to be known as''.
The new rendition would be:
‘'There is established by this Act a Mineral…''
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Hon Member, the decision on the proposed amendment has not been taken. My attention was drawn to that fact, so I thought you would speak to the proposed amendment.
Mr Haruna 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I support the Hon Chairman and his Committee's amendment. If we look at the whole import of clause 1, it is to establish a ‘‘Minerals Income Investment Fund'', not an ‘‘Authority'' and therefore, to find in the last line of subclause (4) ‘‘and the cost shall be borne by the Authority'' is inappropriate. So, a substitution of it for the word ‘‘Fund'' is elegant.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Hon Ranking Member for the Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee, I would hear you now.
Alhaji I.A.B. Fuseini 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, clause 1 subclause (1) establishes the Minerals Income Investment Fund, so I would want to propose that we delete ‘‘a fund to be known as''.
The new rendition would read:
‘'There is established by this Act the Minerals Income Investment
Fund and referred to in this Act as ‘‘the Fund''.
Mr Speaker, that is consistent with modern drafting. We are establishing the Fund, so the words ‘'to be known as'' is not necessary. It is verbose.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Yes, Hon Chairman of the Committee?
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I know the Hon Member for Tamale Central just came back from the United Kingdom (UK) where he went for a drafting course, so, I have no objection to what he said. [Laughter.]
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Yes, Hon Majority Leader?
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I thought the Hon Member was just going to say that we should establish a fund known as the ‘'Minerals Income Fund''. Once it is established, it is not to be futuristic. It is not ‘'to be known us''.
I thought that was the issue he was addressing, but ‘'There is established by this Act a fund known as the Minerals Income Investment Fund'' is how we have been capturing it.
Mr Speaker, I believe it is so because in this particular case, the Constitution provides for the establishing of other funds other than the Consolidated Fund, and that is why he made the distinction. I am just struggling to see where I can get that so that it would reinforce the point that I am making.
And so he would say that:
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, my attention has been drawn to the fact that he took only one course in drafting — [Laughter.]
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Who took what?
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, only one course in drafting would not make him an expert in drafting. And so I side with the Hon Majority Leader.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
You have to make up your mind on where you belong — [Laughter.]
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, “There is established by this Act a Fund known as the Minerals Income Investment Fund, and referred to in this Act as the Fund.”
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Hon Chairman of the Committee on Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs, were you on your feet?
Mr Ben Abdallah Banda 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, when our Leader speaks, it is sometimes difficult to challenge him. But I seemed to be going in tandem with the Hon Ranking Member. This is because what we have been taught in drafting is that simplicity is very important.
And so I would go the way of the Hon Ranking Member, and re-craft subclause (1) by the deletion of, “and referred in this Act as the Fund.”
Mr Speaker, this is because, if we say, “There is established by this Act, a Fund to be known as the Minerals Income Investment Fund”, that is clear, straightforward and well understood without the addition of “and referred to in this Act as the Fund.” I see it to be repetition, and for that matter, redundant.
And so I believe we should delete, “and referred to in this Act as a Fund”.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
First, we have to take a decision whether we are deleting, “a Fund to be known as” or deleting only “to be” before we proceed to the second leg which I strongly disagree with you on.
The Hon Chairman agreed with the Hon Majority Leader, that we should have “There is established by this Act a Fund known as the Minerals Income Investment Fund and referred to in this Act as, The Fund.”, instead of, “There is established by this Act, the Minerals Income Investment Fund”. And so we have to take a decision one way or the other. But the most —
Hon Ranking Member, I would want to hear you again on that.
Alhaji I.A.B. Fuseini 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, indeed, we are looking at clarity, simplicity, and to communicate what we are doing. These are the three major things that we are doing in clause 1 subclause (1). And what are we doing in clause 1? We are establishing the Minerals Income Investment Fund.
That is the import of clause 1 and we do not want to continue to repeat, “Minerals Income Investment Fund”. So And so we are referring to that Fund as, “The Fund” in subsequent provisions of the Bill. To communicate forcefully, directly and simply, I propose, and I still stand by it that, “There is established by this Act, the Minerals Income Fund.”
That is what this Act is establishing, and not “to be known…” which is verbose. It is an old way of drafting — [Laughter] — And we are saying that it is being referred to subsequently as “The Fund”.
Mr Speaker, we already knew, when we were doing the one week drafting course. that the Majority would be the greatest stumbling block to the movement, and to confess, we did discuss it.
Mr Chireh 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, these new drafters are creating confusion — [Laughter.]
Mr Speaker, first and foremost, one cannot redraft a Bill on his or her feet. I think the most appropriate thing for them to do was to bring a proposed amendment. This is because this does not affect anything about this Bill. If it were the old one, it would have passed now. They can bring the new ideas and when the drafting is done, they should take into account what they are saying.
The draftspersons too have been going for courses — [Laughter] — But as it is now, there is nothing that is wrong with this subclause. It is just the phrase, “to be known as” and is it a wrong thing to say, I am to be known as Joseph Yieleh Chireh''? No!
Mr Speaker, if we allow new drafters to come into this House with these amendments, we cannot move — [Laughter].
Mr Kwame Anyimadu-Antwi 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, thank you for the opportunity. I know that my Hon Colleagues are looking at me because I also have to announce that I was part of the course — [Laughter] — But it does not mean that we have to take what we have learnt in isolation.
In an attempt to make the Bill simple, we have to ask ourselves why we are introducing the definite article, “the”? Is it already in existence? Then that is why the definite article must be there. So it must be, “A Fund to be known as”. And so I do not support that amendment.
Mr Iddrisu 3:30 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I do not want to belong to the new or old learners of drafting. But in making laws, it is not only lawyers and us who would use and read the law. And if we just take clause 1 as it is, whether old or new drafters — Taking a we from the amendment by the Hon Chairman, immediately after clause 1, as it is now, I do not see anything wrong with it.
The subclause (2) says, “The Fund”, subclause (3) says, “The Fund” and subclause (4) says, delete “Authority” for the Fund. And so we are only in clause 1 saying that we have created the Fund but because we do not want to be tautological referring to Minerals Investment Fund, we are shortening it to be referred to as “The Fund”.
That is all we are seeking to achieve. One can call me “Haruna Iddrisu”, but the person could call me, H.I, what is the difference? We have only shortened it to be called, “The Fund”.
Mr Speaker, so you can put the Question. Whether old or new, the law is that we are creating a Fund, and beyond its first provision which gives it the baptism of a name of a “Minerals Income Investment Fund”, it would be referred to as “The Fund”
Mr Afenyo-Markin 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I have with me, Act 724, and section 1 of The Insurance Act (Act 206).
Mr Speaker, this is what section 1(1) provides 3:40 p.m.
“There is established by this Act the National Insurance Commission”
So “to be known as”, “to be called” and all that, I am sure, this is consistent with the position of the new draftsmen. This is because this is old but the position taken by him is consistent with what we have.
Mr Speaker, so, I believe we would take a cue and act accordingly.
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I believe where we are now is with the line 1 of subclause (1); where we want to delete “to be”. So that it would read, “There is established by this Act a fund known as
…”
Mr Speaker, so, if you can put the Question on that.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:40 p.m.
Yes, Hon Yieleh Chireh? I would want to put the Question.
Mr Chireh 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I believe the rendition that the Hon Ranking Member gave was to the effect that “There is established by this Act the Minerals Income Investment Fund and referred to in this Act as “the Fund”. I believe that as to the reference to as “the Fund”, we should still keep it.
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, let us settle on the latest rendition given by the Hon Yieleh Chireh. If he could take that one again.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:40 p.m.
No, there are two matters here. It is either we are deleting “a fund to be known as” or we are deleting only “to be” in line 1 of clause 1, subcluase 1.
“There is established by this Act the Minerals Income Investment Fund” or “There is established by this Act a fund known as the Minerals Income Investment Fund”.
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, if I could take this one --
“There is established by this Act the Minerals Income Investment Fund and referred to in this Act as “the Fund”.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:40 p.m.
Hon Majority Leader, I promised you that you would give us the last word.
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, what are we doing in this Bill? We are establishing a fund; a fund that is consistent with article 175 of the Constitution. We are establishing a fund outside the Consolidated Fund -- we are establishing another fund. So, “There is established by this Act a Fund” -- that is what we are doing.
And I am saying that in that case, we do not say “to be known as” because once we establish that fund, the name of the fund is the Minerals Income Investment Fund. We could say: “There is established
by this Act a fund known as the Minerals Income Investment Fund”.
Mr Speaker, that has nothing to do with verbosity. In any event, verbosity has nothing to do with longevity in age. It does not. So the Hon Inusah Fuseini should not be leading us on this path of unrighteousness when he says that it is verbose and it is unfashionable.
Verbosity has nothing to do with old age. But I am saying that being consistent with article 175, which says that the public funds of Ghana shall be the Consolidate Fund -- that is futuristic.
Today, we are establishing a new fund outside the Consolidated Fund. So, “There is established by this Act a Fund that is outside the Consolidated Fund, known as the Minerals Income Investment Fund”. We may or may not add “the Fund” because beneath clause 1, subclause (1), we now use “The Fund” instead of the entirety of the ‘Minerals Income Investment Fund'.
However, if you go to the interpretation section, “the Fund” has been interpreted there to mean the Minerals Income Investment Fund established under clause 1. So we would not need to say “and referred to in this Act as “the Fund” because that is there.
But just because the purpose of this Bill is to establish a fund outside the Consolidated Fund, we would begin by saying that: “There is established by this Act a fund known as the Minerals Income Investment Fund” simpliciter.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:40 p.m.
Hon Members, unless there are any further proposed amendments, I would put the Question on the entire clause 1.
Mr Banda 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I have a little problem with the way clause 1 subclause (2) has been crafted. This is because if you say, “The Fund is a body corporate”, it goes without saying that it has the powers of a body corporate.
So it would be redundant and so my humble opinion is to say subcluase (c) at the concluding part of the provision which reads: “in all respect the powers of a body corporate”. This is because the fact that it is a body corporate presupposes that it has the powers of a body corporate and so there is no need to add “and have in all respects the powers of a body corporate.”
Mr Speaker, so, respectfully, I would like to propose a new rendition.
I beg to move, that “the Fund is a body corporate with perpetual succession, and a common seal, may sue and be sued in its corporate name.”
Mr Speaker, I would want this provision to end there.
I thank you.
Mr Anyimadu-Antwi 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I would not agree with my Chairman's proposal. I say this because you must look at it whether the error of redundancy is causing any mischief. But I think the sentence at the end makes what is being said in subclause (2) clearer.
Otherwise, we would just say that the fund is a body corporate and end there because the rest is also repetition. But it makes it clearer and that is the reason I believe we should maintain it the way it is.
I thank you, Mr Speaker.
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, the Hon Chairman agrees with Mr Anyimadu-
Antwi that this be left in the manner in which it is captured in the Bill. So, if you could put the Question on that.
3.50 p.m..
Mr Chireh 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I oppose the amendment proposed by Mr Banda because we are making the law not for lawyers. We are making the law for ordinary people.
So, when you make a statement like the fund is a corporate body and stop there, as he was saying, you would need to be a lawyer to know what a body corporate can do. But this law is to be applied by ordinary people as well.
So they should read and see what are the incidents that are related to corporate bodies and what one can do with them. So, in any case, this is not a long winding phrase that would confuse people; it just tells one what he could do if we have a corporate body.
Those who are not lawyers would now also know that we could sue them. But if we just say that it is a body corporate, then we would ask what body corporate is and then define it all over again. I believe we should reject his amendment and keep the old style of drafting.
rose
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:40 p.m.
Yes, the Hon Member for Daboya?
Mr Shaibu Mahama 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I am glad to announce that I am also a student of the new -- [Laughter.]
Mr Speaker, I fully agree with the Hon Chairman of the Committee on Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs. Indeed, if we put the last sentence, “…and have in all respects the powers of
Mr Banda 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, with respect, I even got up to say that it appears the Hon Yieleh Chireh misunderstood me, that I said the sentence should end at, “The fund is a body corporate.” That is what it appears he attributed to me which I never said.
All that I said was, “…and have in all respects the powers of a body corporate” is redundant and should be deleted. This is because it goes without saying it. It is implicit in the provision that the Fund is a body corporate and to that extent, all the powers attributed to a body corporate must be assumed by the Fund.
Mr Speaker, I believe we should delete, “and have in all respect the powers of a body corporate”.
Dr A. A. Osei 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I would just want to get clarification from the Hon Chairman of the Committee on Consti- tutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs.
If a Fund is a body corporate, does it automatically have a perpetual succession, a common seal and may sue and be sued? [Interruption.] Then, let us leave it at, “body corporate”. But his point
is that this is not being made for constitutional lawyers like Hon Banda.
It is being made for low and poor people like us who do not understand law, so that with the emphasis, we would have no difficulty. If it is a body corporate, then, all the rest apply.

So, Mr Speaker, I would plead with you; being a lawyer, listen to the non- lawyers and let us make sure that it is simplified and clear enough that everybody, including myself --
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:40 p.m.
Hon Members, I would want us to answer this question.
Dr A. A. Osei 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, he said, if it is a body corporate, then why should we add, “…and have in all respects the powers of a body corporate”? When I asked, he said, a body corporate has perpetual succession.
So, why do we not leave it at, “body corporate”? When we leave it at that, most Ghanaians who are not lawyers would not know what we are talking about. They would have to come and pay them for something that could be explained in the law.
We do not have to come to you all the time. Let us be very clear so that most Ghanaians can follow what it means.
rose
Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:40 p.m.
Yes, Hon Member for Adansi/Asokwa?
Mr Kobina Tahir Hammond 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I have not seen you for a long while. [Laughter]
Mr Speaker, I believe the worry of the Hon Member for Old Tafo is that he would have to pay some moneys to lawyers but that is unfair to lawyers. That is why lawyers are trained and are called lawyers. So he should not worry about how much he would pay for the interpretation.

Mr Speaker, I have looked at quite a few of the Acts. There does not seem to be much wrong with this. To a good extent, the Hon Majority Leader probably has a point and I guess that is the point you made, that a human being is a human

being. We know the attributes of a human being. We do not have to talk about the head, nose -- but if he is a disabled human being who has not got two hands, that is another matter -- [Interruption] -- So, probably that is the point you have made.

But the Hon Member for Old Tafo, Dr Akoto Osei, has made a point. I do not necessarily agree in terms of the law, but at least, for the sake of completeness let us leave it as it is. Yes, we might think that it is otiose and redundant but it is not. It is a body corporate, with a perpetual succession and it describes its attributes. We have seen many of those Acts which have these definitions.

Mr Speaker, I think it is right. Let us leave it there. My Hon Colleague for Tamale Central believes that is the point.
Alhaji I.A.B. Fuseini 3:40 p.m.
Mr Speaker, there is nothing wrong with the sentence formulation. That is granted. But we are asking whether it is the best way to capture it?
Now, Mr Speaker asked a very poignant question. A human being is a human being so to meet the apprehensions of people like the Hon Minister for Monitoring and Evaluation, beyond a body corporate, they have added, “with perpetual succession”, “common seal” and “may sue and be sued” to its corporate name.
rose
Dr A. A. Osei 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker, for the avoidance of doubt, that last sentence --
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
Hon Minister, I have not given you the Floor; sorry.
Dr A. A. Osei 4 p.m.
Sorry, Mr Speaker.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
Hon Member for Ekumfi -- ?
Mr Francis K. A. Codjoe 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I have also read this. I am not a lawyer, but from the Companies Act, many attributes have been given to body corporates, which are not part of the three that have been inserted here. So, if we are to cut that then it suggests that these are the only activities that this Fund could do.
If we put “…and have in all respects the powers of a body corporate…” it is like saying that it is just like any other body corporate with full rights and attributes as defined under the Companies Act of Ghana. I think it should be allowed to stay this way.
Mr Richard M. K. Quashigah 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I agree with what the Hon Member who just spoke said. I think the repetition gives me, a non-lawyer, deeper
insight and understanding on what to do if it is described as a body corporate.
The fact that “perpetual succession, and a common seal”, et cetera were mentioned, it does not surmise all the attributes of a body corporate.
It is very important, especially for those of us who are not legal brains, to have it in there so that we could understand. After all, in this country, we are more than the lawyers. When it comes to the engagement of the law, too many people would have a brush with it than the lawyers. So, for the purposes of clarity and understanding of the majority of the Ghanaian, this repetion would better spice our understanding.
Thank you very much, Mr Speaker.
Mr Alexander K. Afenyo-Markin 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker, not too long ago, many litigants sued State institutions, by which the Attorney-General's Department became a party. The simple reason was that these entities are owned by the State. We, therefore, took a position subsequently to draw a distinction, which resulted in the full description and character, et cetera.
Mr Speaker, from the argument of the Hon Majority Leader that it comes out of a constitutional provision that we establish another fund, in order not for somebody to sue the Attorney-General's Department, it is important not to create any ambiguity or the impression that it is a body corporate.
Somebody could issue a writ to the Attorney-General's Department that it is suing this institution because the person thinks that it is a creature of the Constitution. If we give that full description and we clarify that it could sue and be sued, nobody would make that mistake.
Even if one goes to court to say that it is the Attorney-General's Department, the court would indicate that the wrong body has been sued.
I would beg Hon Banda to graciously withdraw, and then we make progress.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
Hon Members, I would put the Question on the proposed amendment, which is that “clause 1, subclause (2), lines 2 and 3, delete “and have in all respects the powers of a body corporate”.
Question put and amendment negatived.
Clause 1 as amended ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clause 2 -- Object of the Fund
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I beg to move,
clause 2, head note, delete “Object” and insert “Objects”
Mr Afenyo-Markin 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker, the Hon Chairman of the Committee must tell us -- [Interruption.] The Hon Chairman of the Committee should tell us the rationale behind the amendment -- “Object” and “Objects”.
The Hon Majority Leader would want to know whether in the Insurance Act we have “Object” or “Objects”. From what I have just read -- [Interruption.] No, the Hon Majority Leader wanted to know from me, but he did not ask that -- it is not on record.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
Hon Member, address me.
Mr Afenyo-Markin 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker, he disrupted me. [Interruption.] Please, I am on my feet.
Mr Speaker, the Hon Chairman of the Committee should tell this House the reason for the amendment. He cannot just say “Object” and “Objects”; he should tell us.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
Hon Member, it is assumed that you have read the Bill. So, if you have any issues, raise them.
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker, as a matter of fact, if we read clause 2, the opening sentence says, “The objects of the Fund…” There are a number of them; four of them have been listed there. That is why we are changing “Object” in the headnote to “Objects”.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I beg to move, clause 2, paragraph (d), delete.
Mr Speaker, so that the Hon Member for Effutu would not come back to ask for the reason for the deletion. This Fund is not set up to provide funding to the Minerals Development Fund. There is an Act in place that says 20 per cent of mineral royalties would be sent to the Minerals Development Fund. This Fund would not do that since that is already in place. That is why we are deleting paragraph (d).
Mr Afenyo-Markin 4 p.m.
Mr Speaker, my Hon Colleague has created an impression that if he does not explain the reason for the amendment I would come back, which must be corrected. It is not me; it is mandatory that when he effects an amendment, he should give a justification. [Interruption.] It is in the Standing Orders.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
Hon Member, your point is noted.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I am worried about how we have packed these descriptions in clause 2(b). I thought that was where the new generation -- persons who have lately arrived from another planet would have counselled us that it is too verbose.
We have talked about verbosity; it finds expression in clause 2(b). I thought they would advise us that when we have “transparent, accountable and sustain- able manner”, the rest are ancillaries.
Mr Speaker, indeed, the preamble of the Constitution is on probity, transparency and accountability.
Here we are talking about responsible manner. Is it “beneficial”, “transparent”, “accountable” and” sustainable” to the people, that should be what should engage us. I am not too sure of what we mean by ‘responsible' in this context and I thought that we could delete ‘‘responsible'' from clause 2(b) and still make a lot of sense.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
Even before we -- clause 2(b): “monetise the minerals income”. Is the minerals income itself, not money? Not necessarily. I do not understand when you say “monetise”. Are we making laws for finance people or for everybody?
Hon Minister for Monitoring and Evaluation, when it comes to law, you want everybody else to be able to read and understand, but when you say “monetise” what does it mean?
Dr A. A. Osei 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, this is not for finance people. If you look at the Petroleum Revenue Management law, this terminology is used there, and so it is not for finance people.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
So, who is it for? The mining people or who? This is because when I hold this and convert it to cash then it becomes monetised or is that not it? So, what does “monetise” mean?
Mr Chireh 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, when you take money and then use it in a way to add more value. That is the whole purpose of this Bill. It is the revenue that you generate from mineral resources and then monetise it. Then monetisation has something to do with an investment activity.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
Hon Chairman, please explain.
Dr A. A. Osei 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, “monetise” in Akan is translated as, ye di nam n'eyi nam, to wit, we use bait to catch fish.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
Well, you see how difficult it is for even finance people with Doctor of Philosophy (PhD's) -- Let me hear -- Hon Majority Leader, you have the last word. Yes, Hon Member for Keta?
Mr Richard Quashigah 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I had wanted to speak to the issue raised by the Hon Minority Leader, but in the context of what you mentioned; “monetised”. It is simply, the monetary value of some other element that is not money.
Mr Speaker, the Hon Minority Leader talked about us not losing value if we take out the word “responsible” because we are largely talking about “transparent” and “accountable” and that should suffice. Especially, when others have come
with some new thinking urging us to be more elegant than previous.
Mr Speaker, taking out the word “responsible” obviously would have affected the intent largely. This is because one can be “transparent” and not “responsible”; things can be done transparently but in a very irresponsible manner.
So in effect, the word “responsible” there is to insist on things being done in a responsible manner as well as they being transparent.
So, it is very relevant and taking it out will obviously distort the entire thought as is reflected in this clause.
Dr A. A. Osei 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, for a while, the Hon Member for Keta was convincing me, but I would want him to tell us the difference between “responsible” and “accountable”. Are they the same or not? If one is “accountable”, they are “responsible”.
Mr Speaker, what does he mean by saying no? I agree that we should be as simple as possible but we should not say that we must have the “responsibility” in there. This is because I can interpret accountability as responsibility; being accountable is being responsible, and in the English textbook that we used in Achimota School, it will be correct.
Mr Iddrisu 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, there is essentially nothing wrong with the use of the word “monetise”. If you go further into the Bill, we are talking about income or revenues from mineral wealth.
Now, assuming we are anticipating dividends from AngloGold Ashanti Limited, we can quantify the anticipated dividends, maybe, at a certain amount but
because it is paid at the end of a certain period, you cannot demand it earlier than that period.
So, you monetise it by expressing it in monetary terms, get the value of it, use it for your purpose as a State as and when AngloGold Ashanti Limited or Newmont Ghana makes due their honour, then it is yours.
Mr Speaker, so, “monetise” is appropriately used and it is just expressing something in terms of money. For instance, they say that at the end of the year, they will give the Government of Ghana (GoG)GH¢100 million and the GoG is in distress and wants some GH¢50 million -- the Hon (Dr) A. A. Osei has been there before and was very good at it. I hope he remembers; I am reminding him.
Mr Speaker, so, there is nothing wrong with “monetise”. That is the appropriate word, except that when we go further, but let me leave my debate here so that you put the Question. In subclause 2(c), wherever we said: “develop and implement measures…”, I would want us to qualify it with “prudent”.
This is because it cannot just be any measure but prudent along the line before you put the entire Question.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
I am still confused about the use of “monetise”. I like the explanation given but we are talking about investment and this is an investment fund so how do we “monetise” an expectation and invest the expectation?
I want to understand what we are doing, I am not following it and it does not add up for me.
Dr A. A. Osei 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, when you “monetise”, the word investment here suggests that you are putting it somewhere to make returns. Not necessarily so, but all you are trying to
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
So let us say, we expect GH¢100 million at the end of the year and then in the month of June, we say, we want to invest the GH¢100 million.
Dr A. A. Osei 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, we are not necessarily going to invest it and that is why I said that the word ‘investment' here is deceiving. It just says give it to me earlier than you would have done and let me use it the way I would want. I may invest it but not necessarily so, and it could be that I need money immediately to do --
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
I thought we were talking about investment. Probably, I should take my time and read the objects again.
Dr A. A. Osei 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, that is why I am saying that the word ‘investment' here does not give the full import of what is being looked at.
Mr Iddrisu 4:10 p.m.
Mr Speaker, if you would indulge me. I would want to give you a more suitable example and yourself, a good corporate lawyer, your equity interest in maybe, Ghana Telecommunications or AngloGold Ashanti Limited is one per cent. The money value of that one per cent is what we want to “monetise”. So, it is an appropriate word.
Mr Speaker, one knows that they have an equity interest of one per cent, that is not money but they want the value of the one per cent expressed in money terms. So, if that equity interest is worth US$50 million, they ask the person to give them US$50 million and so, it is appropriate.
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, the Hon Majority Leader had indicated that he wanted “responsible” deleted. So I thought you were going to put the Question on --
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:20 p.m.
Well, until now, I also thought “monetise” was inappropriate but it is clearer now.
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, but in your case, that would have meant you are inserting yourself in there. So, you could not have moved the monetise
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:20 p.m.
No, I wanted the matter to be discussed and if we agree that --
Dr Assibey-Yeboah 4:20 p.m.
But the amendment on the Floor now is the “responsible” in the --
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:20 p.m.
The Hon Majority Leader did not actually move the amendment. He commented on the word responsible, so, if you want to move that it be deleted otherwise --
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, it was just a passing comment and I am not really hard on that but I agree that --
Mr Speaker, if we get to clause 3, where we have the Powers of the Fund. Mr Speaker, clause 3 (a) would certainly bring this up and it reads that
“(3). The Fund may
(a) create and hold equity interests in a Special Purpose Vehicle in any jurisdiction in furtherance of its objects, ...”
Mr Speaker, now, we are talking about monetising these interests and again, we should not forget that in the Petroleum
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:20 p.m.
Very well.
In that case can I put the Question?
Mr George Kweku Ricketts-Hagan 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, thank you.
Mr Speaker, I just want to add to the clarification of the issue on the monetisation. In the layman's language and not to make it too financial, we are basically talking about a legal value in money terms today, of whether an asset or cash flows or anything in the future. Mr Speaker, but we are looking at a legal value today. That is what monetisation is.
Mr Speaker, I thank you.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:20 p.m.
Very well.
Hon Members I would put the Question on clause 2.
Mr Shaibu Mahama 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, subject to the proposed amendment that the Hon Minority Leader mentioned concerning the word “prudent” -- “develop and implement ...”
Mr Speaker, measures could be anything and so if we qualify it with the word “prudent”, it would give it some elegance and a room --
Even though the Hon Majority Leader says that it is implied, I am not too sure where the implied nature of the “prudent” comes. Mr Speaker, but I believe that we should have “develop and implement prudent measures to reduce the budgetary exposure of the Republic to minerals income fluctuations”.
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, respectfully, if we read the entirety of that provision, it says that “develop and implement measures to reduce budgetary exposure ...”
Mr Speaker, we are talking about prudent measures or are there imprudent measures that still helps to reduce budgetary exposure? Mr Speaker, no.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:20 p.m.
Hon Members, I would put the Question.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Clause 2 as amended ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Hon Members, that brings us to the end of Consideration of the Minerals Income Investment Fund Bill, 2018.
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, what I heard you say is that that brings us to the end of consideration of the Minerals Income Investment Fund Bill, 2018. Mr Speaker, if it is the end for today, then yes, else it would mean that we have finished with the Bill.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:20 p.m.
We live day by day and the proceedings are for today.
Hon Members, it is almost half past 4.00 p.m. --
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I just want to plead with Hon Colleagues, that we did not start early today. Let us try to start promptly at 10.00 a.m. tomorrow and given the tall order of business, we may have to start extended Sittings from Wednesday.
The Committee on Finance would be meeting tomorrow and a lot depends on them, so between Wednesday and Friday we may have to start extended Sittings up to about 6.00 p.m. but certainly not beyond 7.00 p.m. or in the worst case scenario not to go beyond 9.00 p.m. of each day.
Mr Speaker, thank you very much.
Dr Anthony Akoto Osei 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I hope Leadership in requesting us to be on time and the Extended Sittings, are making appropriate plans to make sure that Hon Members could avail themselves. Mr Speaker, I just want to remind Leadership.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:20 p.m.
Very well.
The Hon Leader has heard you.
Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, I have heard and it is on record that
providing sufficient incentives and motivations for Hon Members to stay and work -- what we experienced during the last Meeting has never happened in the history of the Fourth Republic.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:20 p.m.
So, we could be assured of a repetition or a continuation of the new goodies.
Alhaji I. A. B. Fuseini 4:20 p.m.
Mr Speaker, as a new generation drafter, I rise to confirm without any fear of doubt or hesitation, that last Meeting was really superb and we just hope that it would continue.
Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:20 p.m.
For the record, that was for Hon Members but not Speakers.
ADJOURNMENT 4:20 p.m.