take care of himself or herself. If a person passes all that, then he or she is able to donate blood to save a life.
Mr Speaker, the other opportunity, which is derived from the donation process, is to ensure that there is enough stock to keep the system working. Recently, we had a lot of discussions on the drone delivery services by Zipline. Zipline could only distribute or give blood that is available.
They are not responsible for stocking, and that is why if we all participate in the process to ensure that there is enough stock, we are able to make sure that such a programme works.
Mr Speaker, such an occasion is also good for discussing some of the key challenges when it comes to blood donation. The first one has to do with funding to support the collection process. We have places or populations that are considered safe, and one critical category is the students in the senior high schools.
Most of them are free from hypertension and diabetes, so they are a safe class; but one key challenge that most of the agencies have is the milk, milo and the logistics needed to get them to donate blood.
There are health facilities that want to go out, and the students run over themselves to donate blood; but they want their milk and milo, but the agencies also complain they do not have funds to do that. We need to support because these are some of the very basic challenges.
Mr Speaker, one other key challenge has to do with the fight over turf. There is a turf war. When Parliament organises a programme to encourage people to donate blood, there is a National Blood Service that would want to assert itself as the only qualified institution to process and handle the blood.
If Ridge Hospital, for example, participates, they would also want to have the blood products at their end.
All these issues happen because the National Blood Act has not yet been passed by Parliament. This Act would define the limits and spell out what health facilities could do and what the agencies could also do.
As I speak now, the National Blood Service is, more or less, a recognised wing of the Ministry of Health. They are not an Agency and not backed by law, and it is the Bill that would give their job description and objectives.
Mr Speaker, because we do not have an Act, they survive only on their IGF. I have received calls from people who say that they have donated blood and yet when they needed blood, they had to pay GH¢150. The blood a person donates is not what is given to him or her.
It must be processed first. If there was an Act that spells out the funding and sources, it would be possible that they could get allocations and citizens would not have to pay fully for the processing of the blood.
If a person donates blood, he or she should know that even the processing comes at a cost, and that explains why in getting our own blood, we are asked to pay.
Mr Speaker, there is one opportunity that I cannot leave out, which is the opportunity to save lives. We are in a country where close to 2,000 people die every year from road traffic accident. If we do not have enough blood stocks, we would be in trouble because available blood is what is needed to save lives in those conditions.
Why do we say we have to donate blood consistently? The blood we donate has a shelf life of only 35 to 42 days. After 42 days, the blood
must be thrown away if it has not been used. This means that there must be a sustainable way to ensure that we have stocks available all the time.
Mr Speaker, in conclusion, it is important that we also find ways to encourage people to be donors throughout their lifetime. I have had people who tell me that they donate blood all the time but when they go to clinics or hospitals and their relatives need blood, they are asked to pay fully.
We could have a programme that gives some special certificates to those who donate blood to serve as a waiver for at least one or two every year. This would be an incentive to get them going all the time. One cannot be part of a process to donate blood four to five times a year and when one's relative needs blood, he or she is asked to go strictly through the process just like those who do not even know about the programme.
Mr Speaker, in conclusion, let us either donate blood ourselves or encourage others to do so as advocates because we might be the ones who need the blood and not a third person.
I thank you for the opportunity.