Thank you Mr Speaker. I know I just simply need to second the Motion that the Hon Majority Leader moved but I would like to comment on the view of the Hon Majority Leader on the primaries and their nature in political parties.
It is true that the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs made some attempts to get the political parties to meet over their constitutions and on how they can safeguard this House. It is very apparent as the Hon Majority Leader said. If we continue to pretend and assume that everything is all right, he is predicting that maybe after the next two elections -- I doubt that it would get there because if you talk to many of the experienced Members in this Chamber, it looks like many are just exhausted with the bickering and unnecessary attacks. It is becoming like
a crime to have kept long in this House and gained experience.
Mr Speaker, I do not know if the Hon Majority Leader would recollect when we were in the United Kingdom Parliament and a question was asked on how we do our primaries. When we answered, it was like, is that a democracy; where we open every constituency every four years for primaries? In the United States of America, a congressman said that once you are in Congress, there is 87 per cent chance that you would remain there. That is the reason some of them are able to do four decades in Congress. This is because they do not just open every constituency for contest.
In the United Kingdom, the Labour Party said that you need to raise two- thirds in the constituency that it should be opened for primaries before primaries could be held.
They said in most of these situations if the sitting Hon Members of Parliament (MPs) could raise two- thirds signatories that the constituency should be opened for Primaries, they would not even contest because they know they would have lost fame. However, the way we do it, where
even if a person is the Hon Deputy Speaker all the way to the last backbencher, all the flood gates are opened in the constituency, we should be real.
I know this weekend would just be like what happened in the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Primaries. Maybe, this time, because they are in government, it may even be worse the kind of largesse that would be exchanged. This is against our electoral rules but both Sides of the House engage in it as if it is the order of the day.
People compete in how much they give. If a person gives GH¢5,000, another would give GH¢ 10,000 and we all sit and laugh over it. Sometimes there are video evidences and yet the Electoral Commission (EC), the Attorney-General's Department and the police do not seem to be worried.
We should ask ourselves where people get those moneys from? If this weekend, someone spends GH¢1 million -- when I computed the salary of an Hon MP, together with the estimated ex-gratia, it does not even amount to that sum. So how would the person pay off for those expenses?
If as a country we all pretend that it is a normal practice and delegates from both Sides say it is their cocoa season, we just entrench corruption in our country and we do not see anything wrong with it.