Mr Speaker, with the greatest of respect, at all times, I would want my Hon Colleagues to also understand that issues concerning road construction are technical.
From the ordinary man's point of view, I agree with him that if 92 per cent is the completion percentage, he may not understand and he is right and I totally agree with him. That was why I am reminding all of us including myself that we are talking about technical issues.
In my Answer, I did indicate that there was a valuation order and this means that there have been additions to the original scope. At the same time, I also did indicate that the overall completion percentage is 18 per cent and the original scope dealt with only two aspects of the works. The original scope dealt with the open concrete u-drains as one and secondly, before the road works started.
Mr Speaker, so, if all the drains had been done to specification as contracted, it could have even been 100 per cent. However, the earth works would not have started and so, one might not know that the initial scope stood alone.
If the Hon Member has observed, because it is his Constituency, I am sure he is aware that the drains had been done. The drains constituted one contract and then the earth works.
So, when I said that 18 per cent is being done on the overall contract, then it tells you that not substantial work has been done, and that was why I attributed to the delay of the work to the contractor halting the job which we are taking steps to make sure that the contractor comes back to site.
So, the 92 per cent refers to the drains that the contractor was supposed to do on the portion of the road project. It is related to a specific job and that was what I indicated.