Debates of 4 Jul 2023

MR SPEAKER
PRAYERS 11:09 a.m.

ANNOUNCEMENTS 11:09 a.m.

Mr Speaker 11:19 a.m.
Hon Members, I have
received from the Electoral Commission
the Writ of Election on the Assin North
by-election held on Tuesday, 27th June,
2023 and I shall proceed to read the
relevant parts of the Communication. It
is dated 30th June, 2023 and addressed to
the Clerk to Parliament.
It reads:

Announcements

Hon Members, it is on the basis of

these results that the Electoral

Commission declared Quayson James

Gyakye as the duly‒elected Member of Parliament for the Assin North

Hon Members, Standing Order 14(1)

stipulates that:

Every Member shall, before taking

his seat formally in Parliament, take

and subscribe before the Speaker, in

the House and in the presence of

other Members of Parliament, the

Oath of Allegiance and the Oath of

a Member of Parliament as set out in

Appendix C (1) and (3) to these

Standing Orders.”

Hon Members, furthermore, Order

14(2) states that:

A Member may, instead of taking

the Oath, make and subscribe to a

solemn affirmation in the form

presented in Appendix C (1) and (3)

to these Standing Orders.”

Before I invite the Hon Member-elect

to be sworn in, it is important that I draw

the attention of the House to the presence

of some of our compatriots who have

come to witness the swearing-in of the

Member of Parliament-elect. I have a

long list, so I will not be able to mention

all the names of those present. I have

before me the name of the former

President of the Republic, H.E John

I am informed that he is leading

members of the National Democratic

Congress (NDC) to witness the

swearing-in. With him are the following:

Prof Jane Naana Opoku-Agyemang;

Mr Johnson Asiedu Nketia

(Chairman of NDC);

Mr Julius Debrah (former Chief of

Staff);

Mr Fiifi Kwetey (General Secretary

of NDC);

Prof Joshua Alabi;

Mr Nii Ashimore (Greater Accra

Regional Chairman of NDC);

Mr Totobi Kwakye;

Mr Ade Coker;

Mr Samuel Gyamfi; and

Ambassador Victor Smith.

From the Assin North Constituency,

we have a retinue of chiefs and queen

mothers. The list is quite tall, so, I will

generally acknowledge the

representatives of the paramount chief. I

am informed that they are led by Nana

Hemaa Ntiamoah -- Queen mother of Assin Breku and the Linguist, Okyeame

Kwame Atto, also from Assin Breku.

They are supported by a large number of

other chiefs and queen mothers totalling

23.

Announcements

We also have a number of leaders of

churches and the clergy. There are only

six of them, so I would mention their

names. We have Pastor Sitsofe Kabo

(Baptist Church), Rev Emmanuel Asare

(True Word Ministry), Rev Charles

Awuah Samaritan (Christian Church),

Rev Felix Frimpong (Presbyterian

Church of Ghana), Very Rev Bensford

(Methodist Church Ghana) and Rev

Ebenezer Doe-Afful (Lighthouse

International Church).

Hon Members, His Excellency John

Hon Members, on behalf of the House,

I welcome them to this swearing-in ceremony. I now invite the Hon Member-elect for the Assin North Constituency to proceed to the Speaker's dais to be sworn into office.

Hon Members, I shall now proceed to

administer the oaths, starting with the Oath of Allegiance.

Hon Member, you have been here

before, so, you know the drill.
OATHS 11:19 a.m.

Mr Speaker 11:29 a.m.
Hon Member,
congratulations. On behalf of the
Parliament of Ghana and the 274 Hon
Members, I offer you the essential tools
of your work; the Constitution of the
Republic of Ghana and the Standing
Orders of the Parliament of Ghana.
Hon Member, every day you are going
to your farm, you must have your cutlass
or hoe to go to work. From today, I
would start observing you whether when
you are on the Floor here, you have these
tools to work with. And so, on behalf of
the House, I hand them over to you.
  • [The Rt Hon Speaker handed the Constitution and the Standing Orders of Parliament to the Hon Member for Assin North]
  • Mr Speaker 11:29 a.m.
    Hon Members, I would
    like to, on behalf of all of you,
    congratulate Mr James Gyakye
    Quayson. I welcome him to the House
    and would like to draw his attention to
    the fact that this is a very important role
    he is coming to play. But before I
    continue, it is important that I invite the
    Leaders of the House to also offer some
    words of congratulations to the Hon
    Member on his election and how they
    intend to welcome him to the House. So,
    Hon Members, we would start with the
    Hon Minority Leader.
    Mr Speaker 11:29 a.m.
    Order! Order!

    Oaths

    Hon Members please, if you catch my

    eye, I would do the right thing. Yes, Hon

    Minority Leader?
    Mr Speaker 11:39 p.m.
    Order! Order!
    Marshal, do the appropriate thing. We
    are not supposed to have cameramen
    here without permission —
    Yes, Hon Minority Leader?

    Minority Leader (Dr Cassiel Ato

    Baah Forson): Mr Speaker, thank you

    for the opportunity to congratulate our

    Hon Colleague, Mr James Gyakye

    Quayson, on his re-election and to

    welcome him back to the House of

    Parliament where he rightly belongs.

    Mr Speaker, his success in the by-

    election represents a victory for our

    democracy and clear evidence of the

    savviness of the Ghanaian electorate.

    Assin North Constituency witnessed,

    unfortunately, a sudden outburst of new,

    unplanned and unbudgeted projects

    including the distribution of cash amid a

    major economic crisis of our lifetime.

    Mr Speaker, all this was to influence

    voters immediately Mr James Gyakye

    Quayson's election was declared null and void, and of no legal effect by the

    Supreme Court of Ghana.

    Mr Speaker, the good people of Assin

    North, however, demonstrated that their

    mandate could not be bought by virtual

    Mr Speaker, on 7th December, 2020,

    the good people of Assin North

    expressed their mandate freely and

    elected Mr James Gyakye Quayson to

    represent them in the House. Sadly, from

    the 7th of January, 2021, every effort has

    been made by proxies of Government to

    prevent Mr Quayson from representing

    his people including injuncting him from

    functioning as a Member of Parliament.

    This lasted for almost 14 months until the

    Supreme Court finally made its

    pronouncement.

    Mr Speaker, when these machinations

    by proxies of Government failed to break

    the resolve of Mr Quayson, the

    Government then took up the challenge

    frontally and instituted a criminal charge

    against him with the Attorney-General

    and Minister for Justice virtually urging

    the High Court to hear the matter on a

    daily basis, all to prevent Mr Quayson

    from campaigning for re-election.

    Mr Speaker, the President of the

    Republic even went further by calling on

    voters of Assin North not to vote for Mr

    Quayson because he was jail-bound. The

    President was certain and categorical

    Mr Speaker, this singular categorical

    statement from His Excellency the

    President is not only prejudicial, but it is

    also a threat to fair trial and justice, and

    therefore undermines the judicial system

    which is indeed the anchor of our

    democracy.

    Oaths

    Mr Speaker, all these machinations did

    not deter nor weaken Mr Quayson's resolve. Indeed, he continued to serve his

    people and believed in his vision. It was,

    therefore, not surprising that the good

    people of Assin North reaffirmed their

    confidence in him at the just-ended

    election on Tuesday, 27th June, 2023,

    with a wider margin. They voted

    massively for him and he obtained a

    whopping 57.56 per cent of the valid

    votes cast.

    Mr Speaker, the people of Assin North

    have sent a clear message to all

    politicians and the Government of the

    day in particular that they cannot be

    hoodwinked by the sharing of money,

    nor be intimidated by threats. It is the

    same message that Ghanaians are

    sending to all of us that in the year 2024,

    they will exercise their franchise based

    on their conscience, and no amount of

    tricks nor threats will dissuade them

    from voting out the Administration that

    we are witnessing.

    Mr Speaker, Ghanaians are really

    appalled by the abysmal economic

    mismanagement, poor governance and

    increasing level of corruption leading to

    unprecedented economic hardship being

    experienced by the people of Ghana.

    Mr Speaker, the time has come for us

    as politicians, and rightly so the political

    class, to have a rethink about the

    worsening monetisation of our elections

    and its negative impacts on our

    democracy.

    Mr Speaker, I must commend our Hon

    Colleague, Mr Quayson, for his courage

    and resilient spirit. He has prevailed in

    the face of persecution. I am aware that

    today he is due to appear in court to

    defend the trumped up charges against

    him. My message to him is to take solace

    in the good book, in Deuteronomy 31:6

    which says: “Do not be afraid or terrified because of them. The Lord, your God

    goes with you. He will never leave you

    nor forsake you.”

    Mr Speaker, I wish to serve notice that

    the entire Minority Group will

    accompany our Hon Colleague to court

    today and any other day that he is to

    appear in court. [Hear! Hear!] We are

    solidarising with our Hon Colleague and

    we will not participate in the Business of

    the House anytime he is in court, and we

    will be withdrawing from the Chamber

    after this ceremony if the court processes

    indeed happen today. Amidst

    persecution, corporation will certainly

    suffer. A word to a wise is in Assin-

    North.

    Mr Speaker, let me use this

    opportunity to thank you once again for

    the opportunity. However, let me also

    note that it was only until you swore him

    in that our Hon Colleague, Mr James

    Gyakye Quayson swore the Oath of

    Allegiance and not when he filed his

    nomination at the Electoral Commission.

    That should be noted by all stakeholders

    of State.

    Mr Speaker, I urge the Government to

    listen to the good people of Assin North

    and do the right thing. Thank you. [Hear!

    Hear!] [Some Hon Members: Leader o

    Oaths
  • [Hon Members of the Minority Caucus rose]
  • Mr Speaker 11:39 p.m.
    Order!
    Hon Members, before I invite the Hon
    Majority Leader, the Leader of the
    House, to also say a word, my attention
    has been drawn to the fact that the
    Central Regional Chairman of the
    National Democratic Congress, Prof
    Richard Kofi Asiedu, together with other
    members of the Central Regional
    Executives are here. Also, the
    Constituency Executives of Assin North
    are present.
    Now, it is the turn of the Hon Majority
    Leader to welcome and congratulate the
    Hon Member.
    Majority Leader (Mr Osei Kyei-
    Mensah-Bonsu): Mr Speaker, on the
    occasion of the election, not re-election
    [Interruption] On the occasion of the
    election of Mr James Gyakye Quayson
    — because the Supreme Court ruled that his swearing-in on Thursday, 7th January,
    2021 was an anomaly and indeed was
    null and void. So, people should
    appreciate the import of the Constitution
    that we have all sworn to uphold.
    Mr Speaker, in swearing him in, you
    run him through the oath, and he swore
    an oath to uphold, preserve, and protect
    the Constitution. All of us have sworn to
    do that. The eligibility and qualification
    criteria for Hon Members of Parliament
    are set out in article 94 of the 1992
    Constitution. The tenure of office of Hon
    Members of Parliament are also
    provided for —
    Mr Speaker 11:39 p.m.
    Hon Members, this is a
    very important occasion. Please, listen to
    the Hon Majority Leader.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 11:49 a.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, as I said, the tenure of office of
    the Hon Members of Parliament is also
    provided for under article 97(1) of the
    1992 Constitution which every Hon
    Member has sworn to uphold. Of
    particular importance is Article 97 (1) (e)
    which provides:
    A member of Parliament shall
    vacate his seat in Parliament -
    (e) if any circumstances arise such
    that, if he were not a member of
    Parliament, would cause him to
    be disqualified or ineligible, for
    election, under article 94 of this
    Constitution; or…
    Mr Speaker, if this provision comes to
    be applied, nobody from a true
    conscience can say that this is
    persecution or selective justice. Let us
    respect the Constitution that all of us
    have sworn to uphold. Selectivity will be
    when we elect to apply in piecemeal the
    entirety of the Constitution. So, people
    should understand and appreciate the
    import of this Constitution, and when it
    comes to be applied, it is not selective
    justice.
    Mr Speaker, examples abound in this
    House. We witnessed the appearance and
    disappearance of the Hon Samuel
    Nyimakan. Article 97 was applied. He

    Oaths

    appeared and had to disappear. Hon

    Adamu Dramani Sakande appeared and

    disappeared. Article 97 came to be

    applied. So, when we have people

    talking about selective justice, we

    wonder where they are coming from. We

    have decided and committed ourselves to

    uphold, preserve, protect, and defend the

    Constitution of the Republic.

    Mr Speaker, I heard my Hon

    Colleague say that some political party

    was engaged in the distribution of cash.

    I also witnessed some political party

    distributing machetes, insecticides, and

    wellington boots. [Interruption] If we

    are talking about corrupting the voters,

    liability also could be expressed. The

    Hon Members on the Minority Side

    should be truthful to themselves and their

    conscience.

    Mr Speaker, we welcome our Hon

    Colleague. He entered this House rightly

    or wrongly, but he cultivated friends

    while his stay here lasted. I am not sure

    that anybody can say that Mr James

    Gyakye Quayson is an enemy to him or

    her. We may disagree on a few things,

    but I believe that across the political

    divide, he made so many friends.

    Mr Speaker, however, I believe that

    the NDC would want to believe that the

    victory that our Hon Colleague has

    chalked — and, indeed, we must congratulate him — is a peak victory that would hurt the pride of the NPP as the

    Hon Minority Leader has alluded to. Of

    course, on the other hand, we the

    Parliamentary Group of the NPP also

    believe that this is a momentary victory

    of phantasmal character that certainly

    may not last. However, that is the choice

    of the people of Assin North, and

    everybody must respect that while it

    lasts. The rest of it, as we move from

    here, is in the hands of the Attorney-

    General. While the Hon Member

    remains here, we can only embrace him

    as an Hon Member of Parliament. We

    welcome him here to be part of the

    fraternity while it lasts.

    Mr Speaker, therefore, on behalf of the

    Majority Side, I welcome him and hope

    that he would be able to discharge his

    functions to his constituents while it

    lasts.

    Mr Speaker, I thank you very much.
    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    Hon Members, I believe
    that we now have the full complement of
    the Hon Members of Parliament in the
    House. [Hear! Hear!] It is my duty to
    always direct the Clerk to inform the
    Electoral Commission as to the vacancy
    of a Seat in this House. I hope I would
    not be given the opportunity again to so
    direct that a Seat be declared vacant.
    With this, I humbly plead with you to go
    by the rules and not compel me to so
    direct again. I know when to apply the
    whip, so I am taking note of those of you
    who have decided not to go by my
    directive and are breaching the rules. As
    for the whip, we apply it in various ways,
    and I can assure you that it will be
    applied.

    Oaths

    Hon Member, you are most welcome

    to the House. [Hear! Hear!] You have

    been elected by the people of Assin

    North Constituency. You represent all

    those who voted for you and those who

    voted against you — even those who did not vote. So, you represent all the people

    of Assin North Constituency, just as His

    Excellency the President represents all

    the people of Ghana. Whoever breaches

    these rules does so at the peril of the

    position he or she occupies. I have

    handled a number of petitions before as

    a lawyer, and when I speak, I know why

    I make those statements about selective

    justice, and I stand by those statements.

    [Hear! Hear!] And I can produce solid

    evidence to support my position. So, if

    the reference to the use of “selective justice” is to what I said, then you have to rethink.

    Hon Members, with this, we will

    proceed with the Business of the House,

    and, with your permission, all those who

    are here because of this ceremony have

    my permission to depart from the

    Chamber. I cannot say you are

    discharged because you are not

    appearing before us for anything.

    However, we are happy to have you,

    particularly the chiefs and queen mothers

    from the Assin North Constituency.

    Congratulations on having a very

    peaceful and harmonious election and

    making sure that our democracy is

    deepened. We are grateful to you.
    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    Hon Members, in view
    of the transition, I will suspend Sitting
    for a few minutes. I think 30 minutes will
    do. Sitting is accordingly suspended for
    30 minutes.
    11.59 a.m. — Sitting suspended
    1.06 p.m. — Sitting resumed
    Votes and Proceedings and the
    Official Report
    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    Hon Members, the item
    numbered 5 on the Order Paper — Correction of Votes and Proceedings and
    the Official Report. We will start with the
    Votes and Proceedings of Friday, 30th
    June, 2023.
    Page 1…9?
    Mr Peter Lanchene Toobu 11:49 a.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, page 9, the item numbered 5(iv)
    reads “Accra Girls Senior High School” without an apostrophe, but the item
    numbered 5(v) reads “Accra Wesley Girls' Senior High School” with an apostrophe. Apostrophes show possession
    not plurality, so I think that the item
    numbered 5(iv) is correct, and I would
    like the correction to be done in terms of
    flow and consistency.
    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    Clerks-at-the-Table,
    kindly take note.
    Mr Joseph Osei-Owusu 11:49 a.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    my Hon Friend's intervention is not correct. The schools that appeared in the
    House on Friday are two different sets.
    Accra Girls Senior High School came,
    and Accra Wesley Girls Senior High
    School also came. They are two different
    VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS AND THE OFFICIAL REPORT 11:49 a.m.

    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    The Hon Member was
    talking about the use of apostrophe after
    the “s” after “Wesley Girls”.
    Mr Osei-Owusu 11:49 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, very
    well.
    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    Clerks-at-the-Table,
    kindly take note.
    Prof Nyarko — rose —
    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    Hon Member, I am
    sorry. Today, the colour of your outfit is
    like that of the pillar, so it made it
    difficult to identify you. You may go
    ahead.
    Prof Kingsley Nyarko 11:49 a.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    respectfully, on page 9, I have observed
    that the item numbered 5(v) to the item
    numbered 5(vii), the schools were led by
    leaders, and the names of these leaders
    were captured. However, the item
    numbered 5(i) to the item numbered
    5(iv), the leaders were not captured. For
    consistency sake I would just like to put
    this out there. I do not know whether this
    was an omission or the schools did not
    indicate that.
    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    I think the Hon First
    Deputy Speaker who presided then could
    help us. The Hon Member would like to
    know whether the Achimota School;
    Presbyterian Senior High School, La;
    Presbyterian Senior High School, Osu;
    and the Accra Girls Senior High School,
    Roman Ridge also had leaders, and
    whether they presented their names
    because they were not captured here.
    Mr Osei-Owusu 11:49 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, when
    the lists were brought to be announced,
    those schools did not indicate who led
    them here, so the report cannot capture
    that.
    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    Hon Member, you are
    right, so we will leave it as it is.
    Page 10…26?
    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    Hon Members, the
    Votes and Proceedings of Friday, 30th
    June, 2023, as corrected is hereby
    adopted as the true record of
    proceedings.
    Hon Members, we will now move on
    to the correction of the Official Report. I
    have a copy of the Official Report of
    Wednesday, 22nd March, 2023.
    Any corrections?
    Prof Nyarko 11:49 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would
    like to make a minor correction on the
    cover page of the Official Report.
    “Urgents Questions” should read “Urgent Questions”. So, we delete the “s” after “Urgent”.
    Mr Speaker 11:49 a.m.
    Hon Member, you are
    correct. Clerks-at-the-Table, kindly take
    note.
    Hon Members, any more corrections?
    Hon Members, the Official Report of
    Wednesday, 22nd March, 2023 as

    corrected, is hereby adopted as the true

    record of proceedings.
    ANNOUNCEMENTS 1:16 p.m.

    Mr Speaker 1:16 p.m.
    Hon Members, my
    attention has been drawn to a study visit
    to our Parliament by two groups from
    South Africa. They are the members of
    the Portfolio Committee on Human
    Settlements from the Kwazulu-Natal and
    Limpopo Provincial Legislatures of the
    Republic of South Africa. They are to be
    with us from 3rd to 7th July, 2023.
    Hon Members, because of the early
    proceedings concerning the swearing-in
    of our Hon Colleague, they had to later
    move to a committee meeting. So, they
    are with some committees of the House
    now, but it is important I acknowledge
    their presence in the Parliament of
    Ghana. They are not present to be
    introduced, but they are here to share
    ideas and best practices with us,
    particularly in areas of human
    settlements, which include affordable
    housing and other public housing
    systems. They would also touch on the
    management of disasters caused by
    climate change and how to minimise
    their impacts. This visit is also intended
    to create a platform for networking
    between Hon Members and their South
    African counterparts, and the major aim
    is to deepen our relations.
    Hon Members, they are quite a large
    number; there are about 26 members
    present here. I would like to call on all of
    you to warmly receive them and give
    them all the assistance and cooperation,
    and as much as possible, please, the
    personal touch is very important. Get
    close to them, learn how they do their
    businesses, how their Parliament works,
    and even after the House Sits, you could
    still make friends for you to exchange
    visits. So, please, these are very
    important occasions for Hon Members of
    Parliament. We were able to benefit from
    a lot of it, so I am drawing your attention
    to it.
    Hon Members, we can now move on
    to Urgent Questions. There is one Urgent
    Question, which stands in the name of
    the Hon Member for Tamale South, Mr
    Haruna Iddrisu.
    Mr Frank Annoh-Dompreh 1:16 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, with respect, I seek your leave
    for us to vary the order of Business and
    instead go on to take the item numbered
    9 — Commencement of Public Business, Laying of Papers, by the Hon Majority
    Leader, after which we would revert to
    take the item numbered 6 duly. I have
    related to the Hon Minority Chief Whip
    appropriately.
    Mr Speaker 1:16 p.m.
    Hon Majority Chief
    Whip, I have already called one item and
    I have invited the Hon Member. So, I
    will hear from the House, so that from

    there, I can now go to your request. I can

    go to your request after a response to the

    issue I raised early on. It is not for you; it

    is for the House, unless you have

    information on it.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 1:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    had earlier engaged my Hon Colleague,
    the Hon Minority Chief Whip, on this
    matter, and I tried to catch your attention.
    If you may indulge me, we would seek
    your leave for us to vary the order of
    Business and rather go on to the item
    numbered —
    Mr Speaker 1:16 p.m.
    Hon Majority Chief
    Whip, I have no problem with that.
    However, I am saying that I have already
    mentioned the Urgent Question. I know
    the Hon Member in whose name the
    Question stands is not present. Maybe,
    he has authorised another Hon Member
    to ask it in his stead or maybe the Hon
    Minister for Finance is not available to
    answer the Question. That is what I want
    us to do before we move on to your
    request.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 1:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    indeed, the Hon Minister is on his way
    here; he should be here in a few minutes.
    So, that is what has informed my
    decision.
    Mr Speaker 1:16 p.m.
    All right.
    Mr Kwame Governs Agbodza 1:16 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, my Hon Colleague did confirm
    with me, and because the Hon Minister
    is not available, I have the authority of
    our Senior Colleage, Mr Haruna Iddrisu,
    to ask the Question on his behalf if the
    Hon Minister makes himself available.
    So, I would agree with the Hon Majority
    Chief Whip. We can —
    Mr Speaker 1:16 p.m.
    All right. We will stand
    down this Question, awaiting the arrival
    of the Hon Minister, and move on to the
    request that the Hon Majority Chief
    Whip has made to vary the order of
    Business and move straight to Public
    Business.
    Hon Members, at the commencement
    of Public Business, item number 9 — Presentation of Papers. The following
    Papers numbered 9(a) (i) to (xiii) are to
    be presented together by the Hon
    Majority Leader if they are all ready,
    instead of taking them separately.
    Hon Majority Leader, what do you say
    to that?
    PAPERS 1:16 p.m.

    Mr Speaker 1:26 p.m.
    Hon Members, the
    subject matter; Committees, particularly
    the Leadership, are encouraged to
    participate in the discussions. We are
    dealing with Education, Local
    Government and Rural Development,
    and other subject matter Committees like
    the Committee of Finance and the
    Committee on Subsidiary Legislation.
    Now, we would move on to item
    number 10.
    Yes, Hon Majority Leader?

    Papers
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:26 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, there is just a minor correction
    of 9(a)(i).
    Mr Speaker 1:26 p.m.
    9(a)(i)?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:26 p.m.
    Yes. It
    should read: “Report of the Auditor- General on the Public Accounts of
    Ghana (Ministries, Departments, and
    Agencies”. It should not be “….and other Agencies”. It is as if Departments are also Agencies. It should be “… (Ministries, Departments and Agencies)
    for the Financial Year Ended 31st
    December, 2022”.
    Mr Speaker 1:26 p.m.
    You may have to cross-
    check from the title of the Report. They
    might have put “other Agencies” there, so the Table Office is compelled to
    capture it as it is presented. This is
    because I have come across it that way.
    They say “other Agencies”.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:26 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, that is the point I am making.
    Departments are not Agencies.
    Mr Speaker 1:26 p.m.
    I agree with you.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:26 p.m.
    Yes. So, if
    they have gotten it wrong, we should tell
    them that they are wrong.
    Mr Speaker 1:26 p.m.
    Well, how to do it
    properly is the challenge now. This is
    because the Table Office is to capture the
    title of the Report. So, it is later that we
    can write to the Table Office for them to
    take note and capture it properly. This is
    because Ministries and Departments are
    not Agencies.
    Mr Agbodza 1:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I can see
    one of the Papers being laid by the Hon
    Majority Leader is a Performance Audit
    Report of the Auditor-General on Cocoa
    Roads contract.
    Mr Speaker, I remember last week you
    had a petition on some cocoa road
    contractors which was copied to the
    leadership of the Committee on Roads
    and Transport, and you directed that
    Leadership would work on it. However,
    Leadership never met on this. Now that
    we are coming to take this Report, I think
    the background to some of these things
    may be reflected in the petition that was
    written to you.
    So, I am just wondering whether you
    should take the opportunity and refer that
    petition appropriately to a Committee to
    be looked into instead of leaving it to
    Leadership, which does not appear to be
    getting any space for us to consider it.
    This is because it would be a tragedy if
    we go ahead and consider this Audit
    Report without having the background of
    some of the petitions that we have
    received regarding cocoa road projects in
    this country, which is a major issue.
    Mr Speaker 1:26 p.m.
    Well, I thought I
    handled that one administratively
    without bringing it to the floor of the
    House. This is because if you have to
    bring it to the floor of the House, you
    have to go through the process of the
    Standing Orders, and the rules say that a
    petition of this nature has to be
    represented by an Hon Member on the
    Floor. So, I would have had to write back
    to them to come through an Hon
    Member. However, I decided to handle it

    Papers

    administratively by calling on the

    Leaders, because it is a serious matter, to

    take up the issue and report back to me

    so that we see what we could do to

    resolve it. It deals with huge arrears that

    are owed contractors, and there is likely

    to be some agitations, so we think that it

    would not work in the interest of the

    country; it may be breach of peace and

    that kind of thing.

    So, I thought Leadership should have

    taken up this matter long ago, contacted

    the Hon Ministers involved and the

    players, the contractors, and see how we

    could solve the issue amicably. I am sure

    the Hon Majority Leader is working on a

    few things with the Hon Minister for

    Finance, who we are expecting today. I

    think this is one of the issues that would

    be taken up. So, we would leave it as it is

    and let the Committee handle this Report

    and report back to us. By the time they

    come, we would have finished settling

    this problem.

    So, with this, Hon Majority Leader, is

    item 9(b)(c)(d)(e) and (f) ready? Or

    should we move on?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:26 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I would have wished that item
    9(b) was ready, but unfortunately, I am
    not in the position to really speak to it.
    Mr Speaker 1:26 p.m.
    I know that it is ready.
    As the Chairman of that Committee, I
    saw the Report and went through it, so
    we can lay it.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:26 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I was discussing it with my
    Caucus this morning that we must finish
    with this early enough in order to
    recompose the Committees in
    anticipation of the consideration of the
    Budget during the Budget meeting. So,
    we need to reconstitute them ahead of
    time and, of course, it depends on the
    approval or adoption of the Report of the
    Standing Orders Committee. If I have to
    present it on your behalf, I would
    accordingly do so.
    By the Chairman of Committee
    Report of the Standing Orders
    Committee on the Review of the
    Standing Orders of the Parliament of
    Ghana.
    Mr Speaker 1:26 p.m.
    I would like to urge Hon
    Members to take their time to go through
    the Report. There are a lot of changes
    that we are proposing to the existing
    Standing Orders. There are some details
    that we spelled out which would ease up
    the processes to clarify a number of
    issues, and after the approval, we would
    take some time to go through the training
    of Hon Members. However, this is to
    give Hon Members the opportunity for a
    revision of the existing Committees to
    prepare them for the Mid-year Budget
    Review and the Supplementary Budget
    which would be presented in July. So,
    Hon Members should take this Report
    seriously and let us learn together.
    Mr Sayibu Suhuyini Alhassan 1:36 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, thank you very much for the
    opportunity to seek your guidance on
    Order 60(1) and 65(4) of our Standing
    Orders. Mr Speaker, Order 60(1) says
    that: “Ministers shall, by order of the House, be requested to attend Sittings of

    Papers

    the House to answer Questions asked of

    them.” It also says in Order 60(3) that: “A Minister shall not take more than three weeks to respond to a question

    from the House.”

    Mr Speaker, Questions are an

    important part of our work as

    representatives and legislators. On the

    Order Paper today, there are Questions

    for the Hon Minister of Finance. These

    Questions have been rescheduled three

    times. Today, because of these

    Questions, I have had to reschedule my

    medical appointment twice, and I am still

    unable to tell if there would be an

    opportunity to ask these Questions today.

    This is the third time these Questions

    have been rescheduled.

    Mr Speaker, these Questions have

    been in the pipeline for more than four

    months.

    Mr Speaker, I just rose so that you

    would guide me based on Standing Order

    65(4), 60(1) and especially Order 60(3),

    which says that Questions must not take

    more than three weeks.

    Mr Speaker, I seek your indulgence.

    Thank you very much.
    Mr Speaker 1:36 p.m.
    Well, the first thing is
    that it is the same Hon Minister that has
    been scheduled to answer the Urgent
    Question; so, when I got to the Urgent
    Question, I was informed by Leadership
    that the Hon Minister was caught up with
    earlier business, but is on his way
    coming, so we should stand down those
    Questions for him to arrive and answer,
    so I ceded to that request.
    The second aspect is that throughout
    the life of the Fourth Republican
    Parliament, we have not been able to
    fully implement Order 65(4); am I right?
    [Pause] No, the one that deals with the
    time limit is Order 60(3). Because of the
    state in which the Government services
    or institutions are in the country, it has
    not been easy to get responses from, for
    example, the Tamale North District
    Assembly to gather the facts and send
    through the Ministry to another Ministry.
    It takes some time, so we have not been
    able to exact our pound of flesh. That is
    the reality.
    We need to strengthen those
    institutions before they can stand up to
    this three-week duration. We have a
    challenge there, and so, we have not
    strictly applied or enforced that
    provision. That is the explanation I can
    give, but today, the intention is for the
    Hon Minister for Finance to come and
    answer the Urgent Question and the
    other Questions following the Urgent
    Questions. So, Mr Sayibu Suhuyini
    Alhassan, Hon Member of Parliament
    for Tamale North, we apologise for the
    inconvenience, but you may still have to
    wait a bit for the Hon Minister for
    Finance to arrive.
    Hon Members, now, we move to the
    item numbered 10 on page 7 of the Order
    Paper, which deals with the Management
    of the Energy Sector Levies and
    Accounts. Is it ready? Are we ready to
    take that?

    Papers
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 1:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    the item numbered 10 is not ready yet.
    Mr Speaker 1:36 p.m.
    So which items are
    ready for us to take or should we call it a
    day?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu — rose —
    Mr Speaker 1:36 p.m.
    Hon Members, we have
    a number of Bills. They have been
    pending for some time. Anyway, the Hon
    Majority Leader is on his feet, maybe, he
    wants to draw my attention to something.
    Yes, Hon Majority Leader?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:36 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, the Hon Minister of State at the
    Ministry of Finance has joined us, and I
    want to seek your indulgence for him to
    respond to the Questions that the Hon
    Minister for Finance was required to
    come and answer.
    Mr Speaker, it is so because of the
    sudden twist of events which have
    resulted in the unavailability of the
    substantive Minister. I think the Hon
    Minister of State is capable of answering
    the Questions.
    Mr Speaker 1:36 p.m.
    Yes, Minority Front
    Bench, there is a request; what do you
    say to that? The Hon Minister of State at
    the Ministry of Finance is in to on behalf
    of the Hon Minister of Finance answer
    the Questions.
    Mr Agbodza 1:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, yes, my
    Hon Colleague informed me about the
    fact that the substantive Minister is not
    available and requested if our Colleague,
    the Hon Minister of State at the Finance
    Ministry could take the Questions on his
    behalf.
    Mr Speaker, indeed, these are policies
    and major Questions, so maybe, we
    should allow the Hon Colleague to take
    the Answers. Depending on the Answers
    provided, we might request the
    appearance of the Hon Minister for
    Finance to make other things clearer,
    since they are policy issues.
    So, Mr Speaker, we do not have
    fundamental objections to our
    Colleague, the Hon Minister of State at
    the Ministry of Finance, providing the
    Answers on behalf of the Hon Minister
    of Finance.
    Mr Speaker 1:36 p.m.
    Yes, apart from the
    Urgent Question, the Answers to the
    other Questions are on the Order Paper,
    and you will follow up with
    supplementary questions. It is only the
    Answer to the Urgent Question that we
    do not have here.
    So, Hon Minority Chief Whip, you
    said you have the authority of the Hon
    Member for Tamale South to ask the
    Question for and on his behalf. Are you
    ready to do that now, so that we can
    move on?
    Mr Agbodza 1:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I have
    since passed on the authority to Mr
    Edward Abambire Bawa, the Hon
    Member for Bongo, to ask the Question
    on his behalf.
    Mr Speaker 1:36 p.m.
    What did you say?

    Papers
    Mr Agbodza 1:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I had the
    authority to ask the Question on behalf of
    the Hon Member for Tamale South.
    Apparently, that same authority was
    given to Mr Edward Abambire Bawa,
    just in case I did not make it to the
    Chamber on time at the time of the
    Questions. So, Mr Speaker, I oblige and
    request my Colleague, Mr Bawa, to ask
    the Question on behalf of the Hon
    Member for Tamale South. So, I am not
    passing on my authority. He has also got
    his own independent authority to ask the
    Question on behalf of the Hon Member
    Mr Speaker 1:46 p.m.
    Well, the legal principle
    is very clear: delegatus non potest delegare; delegated authority cannot be delegated, and so, your first submission shows that you were caught up by that rule. I see how you have wrangled yourself out of it. So, Hon Member for Bongo, Mr Edward Abambire Bawa, you have your own authority.
    URGENT QUESTIONS 1:46 p.m.

    MINISTRY OF FINANCE 1:46 p.m.

    Mr Speaker 1:46 p.m.
    Yes, Hon Minister?
    Dr Mohammed Amin Adam (Minister
    of State, Finance): Mr Speaker, I appreciate
    the opportunity to respond to this
    Question on behalf of the Hon Minister
    for Finance. With your kind permission,
    I will proceed to provide the direct
    response to the Urgent Question now.
    Mr Speaker, Government's total indebtedness to pension schemes as at the
    end of May, 2023 is GH₵2,631,855,254.06 comprising the following:
    Tier 1, Controller and Accountant-
    General's Department mechanised payroll, GH₵1,628,859,472.37;
    Tier 1 sub-vented institutions:
    GH₵188,597,229.04;
    Tier 2 mechanised payroll:
    GH₵808,213,964.10; and
    Tier 2 sub-vented institutions: GH₵6,184,588.55.
    Mr Speaker, Government paid
    GH₵2,672,533,059.86 to various pension schemes in 2022. Between January and
    end of May 2023, Government has also
    paid GH₵2,206,659,921.90.
    Mr Speaker 1:46 p.m.
    Yes, Hon Member, is
    there any supplementary question?
    Mr Bawa 1:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would want
    to ask the Hon Minister whether the
    pensions savings are released on time
    and invested?
    Dr Adam 1:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Question
    was on the releases to the various
    pension funds, but as to the time of the
    releases, I do not have the answers now.

    Urgent Questions

    I would get the answers and report

    back to the House.
    Mr Speaker 1:46 p.m.
    Hon Member, is there
    any further supplementary question?
    Mr Bawa 1:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is not a
    supplementary question, but it is just to
    know when we would get that. This is
    because the time of the releases also
    affects — It is an investment; so, the longer the Government stays in not
    investing the funds, the higher it is in
    terms of the effects to the beneficiaries.
    So, I would want the Hon Minister to tell
    us exactly —
    Mr Speaker 1:46 p.m.
    Hon Members, the Hon
    First Deputy Speaker to take the Chair.
    1.49 p.m. — MR FIRST DEPUTY
    SPEAKER IN THE CHAIR 1:46 p.m.

    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:46 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, shall we continue, please?
    Mr Bawa 1:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon
    Minister said he did not have the
    information as to whether those
    pension's savings have been invested and how soon they were invested, and I
    want him to assure us when he could
    make that information available. This is
    because if the Government has much
    deductions and does not invest that, it has
    implications on my future. So, when can
    the Hon Minister make that information
    available to us?
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 1:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    with respect, my Hon Colleague should
    advert to the Standing Order 69. The
    thrust of his Question was on how much
    was owed the various pension schemes,
    not the time of release. I think the Hon
    Minister was charitable by answering his
    follow-up question and telling him that
    he does not have the information
    available presently.
    Mr Speaker, if my Hon Colleague is
    minded, he should rather file a
    substantive question because the subject
    matter is entirely different from the main
    question, so he should advert to Standing
    Order 69.
    Mr Bawa 1:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, first and
    foremost, the Rt Hon Speaker had not
    ruled against my supplementary question
    before you took over. So, the Hon
    Minister got up and answered it and said
    he did not have the information, and all I
    asked was when that information could
    be made available.
    Mr Speaker, the Rt Hon Speaker did
    not rule that what I said was out of order;
    so, the Hon Majority Chief Whip cannot
    ambush me because the Hon First
    Deputy Speaker has taken the Chair.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 1:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    am surprised at my Hon Colleague, who
    I respect a lot. Are the rules applied by
    the Rt Hon Speaker different from those
    applied by the Hon First Deputy
    Speaker? We can be charitable and
    accommodate him, but he should not go
    on that tangent. The rules are the same.
    Mr Speaker, I think you should rule
    him out of order. He is completely out of
    order.

    Urgent Questions

    Deputy Minority Leader (Mr

    Emmanuel Armah-Kofi Buah): Mr

    Speaker, the Hon Minister is here; he has

    not indicated that he cannot answer the

    question asked. I think we should let the

    Hon Minister answer the question. The

    intervention is neither here nor there.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:46 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I am not going to the substance
    of the matter, but Hon Leaders exist here
    to assist the Speaker to apply the rules of
    this House; so, if an Hon Leader gets up
    to draw the attention of the Speaker to an
    applicable rule, one cannot say that the
    point of intervention is neither here nor
    there.
    Mr Speaker, not to spend so much on
    this, the Hon Minister is here, and you
    are also in charge, if you think that the
    question should be responded to, that is
    it; the Hon Minister could just respond to
    it.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:46 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, the Hon Majority Chief Whip
    referred to Standing Order 69. Standing
    Order 69 is to guide us as to how and
    what are admissible on supplementary
    questions. I have just come in, so I did
    not hear the main answers, so I will err
    with caution and ask the Hon Minister if
    he could provide the details the Hon
    Member is asking for. If so, when?
    Dr Adam 1:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, in my Answer
    to the substantive Question, I indicated
    that Government paid
    GH₵2,672,533,055.86 to various pension schemes in 2022, and also,
    between January 2023 and end of May
    2023, Government has also paid
    GH₵2,206,659,921.90. So, the periods within which the payments were made
    are already provided in the substantive
    Answer, but if the question is as to the
    specific dates of the releases, I said
    earlier that I do not have that, and I
    would be happy to get the information
    and report to the House.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:56 p.m.
    Very well,
    that should bring us to the end of Urgent
    Questions, unless there is any further — Now, we will move on to the Oral
    Answers to Questions.
    We will move to the Question
    numbered 237, which is to be asked by
    the Hon Member for Tamale North, Mr
    Sayibu Suhuyini Alhassan.
    ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS 1:56 p.m.

    MINISTRY OF FINANCE 1:56 p.m.

    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:56 p.m.
    Before I
    invite the Hon Minister to Answer, Hon

    Oral Answers to Questions

    Members, having regard to the state of

    the Business of the House, I direct that

    the House sits outside the regular Sitting

    hours. Yes, Hon Minister?

    Minister of State, Finance (Dr

    Mohammed Amin Adam) (MP): Mr

    Speaker, I would like to thank the Hon

    Member for Tamale North for the

    Question.

    Mr Speaker, revenue mobilisation

    remains a challenge for us as a country.

    Our tax-to. GDP ratio averages 13 per

    cent, which is lower than the average 18

    per cent for the sub-region. Therefore,

    unlocking the full potential of our

    domestic revenue mobilisation is one

    that is at the core of the President's vision of a Ghana Beyond Aid.

    McKinsey was engaged to support our

    efforts to increase tax revenues over the

    baseline of “17 per cent year-on-year growth”, as indicated in the Question, and other interventions to increase

    efficiency and effective work culture.

    Mr Speaker, the overarching target of

    “17 per cent year-on-year growth” was exceeded. Total revenue growth

    recorded was 28 per cent year-on-year.

    GRA's total payment to McKinsey over the contract period of 2018-2022 was

    US$12.2 million.

    Mr Speaker, in terms of performance,

    the collaboration between GRA and

    McKinsey resulted in an increase in

    revenue from GH₵38 billion in 2018 to GH₵75.5 billion in 2022, a cumulative average of about 19 per cent over the

    period.

    Mr Speaker, not only did McKinsey

    help us increase our revenue, but they

    helped lead a cultural shift and

    professionalism, including the use of

    enhanced performance appraisal and

    analytical tools, which will anchor

    significant improvement in revenue

    mobilisation.

    Mr Speaker, despite these very good

    results, and Ghana's current tax-to-GDP ratio rising from 12.1 per cent in 2016 to

    13.8 per cent as at end 2022, our revenue

    performance is still one of the lowest in

    the sub-region. For context, our peer

    countries are collecting an average of 18

    per cent while Organization for Economic

    Co-operation and Development (OECD)

    countries are achieving about 34 per

    cent. There is evidence that Ghana has

    enormous capacity to double its tax

    revenue, and at the very minimum, be at

    par with our peers without introducing

    new taxes.

    Mr Speaker, Government is also

    leveraging digitalisation, including

    initiatives such as the E-Invoicing, E-

    VAT, E-Levy, Ghana.gov among others

    to expand the tax net, eliminate leakages

    and close the tax gap. Results from the

    pilot phase of the E-VAT and E-

    Invoicing, for example, supplemented by

    physical monitoring by staff of GRA are

    truly revealing. The initial results have

    emboldened us to expand the coverage to

    other targeted entities.

    Mr Speaker, the Government of H. E.

    Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo is

    changing the narrative around mobilising

    domestic revenue for development. I

    therefore take this opportunity to, once

    Oral Answers to Questions

    again, express profound appreciation to

    this august House for the strong

    partnership that resulted in the approval

    of the outstanding 2023 revenue bills on

    Friday, 31st March, 2023.
    Mr S. S. Alhassan 1:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    wish to thank the Hon Minister for his
    response. I also wish to make reference
    to paragraph 2 of the Hon Minister's response, which states:
    “Mr Speaker, the overarching target of “17 per cent year-on-year growth” was exceeded. Total revenue
    growth recorded was 28 per cent
    year-on-year”.
    Mr Speaker, I have with me — and I invite the Hon Minister, if he is able to,
    to check the website of the GRA where
    they have published tax-to-GDP ratios
    and revenue growth rates.
    Mr Speaker, there is a table on the
    website of the GRA, and in the table, we
    would find tax revenue growth rate on a
    yearly basis. For 2015, it was 29.3 per
    cent; for 2016, it was 25.0 per cent; for
    2017, 21.4 per cent; for 2018, the year
    that the contract was signed, it was 16.5
    per cent; for 2019, 16.5 per cent; and
    2020, 4 per cent.
    Could the Hon Minister reconcile this
    data on the website of the GRA that
    indicates that the year-on-year revenue
    growth rate is less that 17 per cent,
    meanwhile in the Hon Minister's Answer, he is quoting 28 per cent? Could
    the Hon Minister explain?
    Dr Adam 1:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is important
    I indicate, that I do not know the basis for
    this revenue growth, and so I would ask
    to study the data provided, and also, in
    consultation with the GRA, do the
    reconciliation and provide appropriate
    Answers to the House.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:56 p.m.
    Are you
    suggesting that your data is different
    from what the Hon Member has referred
    to?
    Dr Adam 1:56 p.m.
    Yes, Mr Speaker.
    Mr S. S. Alhassan 1:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    wish to commend the Hon Minister's candidness, but I also want to find out
    from him if he is able to explain to us
    why a contract sum of US$18.240 ended
    up, according to his Answer, with the
    payment of US$12.2 million.
    Mr Speaker, what I mean is, the
    contract sum — and I do have the contract here — that was signed between GRA and McKinsey & Company Inc.
    Ghana was US$18,240,000 based on
    performance. Mr Speaker, the Hon
    Minister, in his Answer, said that GRA
    has made total payment to McKinsey &
    Company Inc. Ghana over the contract
    period of 2018-2022 to a tune of
    US$12.2 million. I would like to find out
    what resulted in the reduction of the
    contract sum.
    Dr Adam 1:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am unable to
    tell whether there is a reduction because
    as I speak to you, there are requests for
    payment by McKinsey & Company Inc.
    Ghana which we are looking at, so, when
    the final payments are made, we will

    Oral Answers to Questions

    report to this House what the actual

    amount released to McKinsey &

    Company Inc. Ghana is.
    Mr S. S. Alhassan 2:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the
    Hon Minister's Answer is actually reporting full payment. It is reporting
    total payment for the contract period. In
    fact, it says, “GRA's total payment to McKinsey over the contract period of
    2018-2022, which was the contract
    period, was US$12.2 million.”
    Mr Speaker, perhaps, the Hon
    Minister of State's response is the reason I raised the earlier concern with regard to
    the Hon Minister of Finance's absence. Mr Speaker, this is because it is clear the
    Hon Minister for Finance would have
    been in a better position to provide some
    of the information that is being sought.
    The Hon Minister of State, admittedly,
    is new at the Ministry, and may not be
    aware of this contract that was entered
    into in 2018, ran its full course and ended
    in 2022. That is why it is important that I
    reiterate the point that the Hon Minister
    for Finance take this House seriously,
    especially when we seek information
    from him, not only when he wants us to
    pass Bills and laws to help him raise
    revenue —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, kindly ask your follow-up
    question please.
    Mr S. S. Alhassan 2:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the
    point is that the Answer quotes total
    revenue, so the Hon Minister's response
    that as and when payments are made, the
    records would be updated does not seem
    accurate.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:06 p.m.
    Well, that
    is not a question. It is a comment, but if
    you want to —
    Dr Adam 2:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I need to put
    this in proper perspective because what
    he has quoted talks about total payments
    to McKinsey & Company Inc. It does not
    talk about total amount due McKinsey &
    Company Inc. So, I need to make this
    correction.
    Mr Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa 2:06 p.m.
    I
    am grateful, Mr Speaker. The Hon
    Minister of State's response at the third paragraph indicates that the contract
    period was from 2018 to 2022. Today is
    July 4th, 2023. Can the Hon Minister tell
    us the state of this relationship with
    McKinsey & Company Inc.? After this
    period of 2018 to 2022, is this House to
    understand that the Ministry's engagement with them has ended and
    that they have no business in Ghana any
    longer so far as this contract is
    concerned? In other words, what is the
    state —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, your question is understood.
    Dr Adam 2:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we still have a
    relationship with the company. I
    indicated in my Answer to the
    substantive Question that McKinsey &
    Company Inc. continues to help us to
    change the work culture and also to
    improve on the professionalism of GRA,
    including the introduction of new

    Oral Answers to Questions

    analytical tools to appraise their perfor-

    mance, which will anchor significant

    improvement in revenue mobilisation.

    The fact that we still have a request for

    payment by McKinsey & Company Inc.

    attests to the fact that we have not paid

    them all and therefore some relationship

    still exists.
    Mr Agbodza 2:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we thank
    our colleague, the Hon Minister for the
    answer. McKinsey & Company Inc. is a
    foreign company. I do not remember the
    Ministry coming to Parliament under
    Article 181(5) to seek approval to engage
    McKinsey & Company Inc. to do
    whatever they are doing. I ask simply
    because if we did, we would have been
    aware that the contract period is between
    a certain period.
    Mr Speaker, you being a very
    respected lawyer — contracts have lifespan. There is no contract that is
    perpetual. Even if it perpetual, it has to
    be stated. My question to the Hon
    Minister is to know whether this
    engagement with McKinsey & Company
    Inc. is an international agreement that
    ought to have been brought to Parliament
    for approval. This is because McKinsey
    & Company Inc. is an international
    company and falls under article 181 (5)
    of the 1992 Constitution — [Interruption] My question to the Hon
    Minister is to know whether it is an
    international contract, and whether they
    brought it to Parliament for approval
    under article 181 (5) of the Constitution.
    If they did, the details of what we
    approved would have been available to
    us. I am not arguing, I am just asking a
    simple question.
    Mr Patrick Yaw Boamah — rose —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Minority Chief Whip, you have asked
    him the question. Kindly resume your
    seat.
    Hon Member for Okaikwei Central,
    Mr Patrick Yaw Boamah, why are you
    on your feet?
    Mr Patrick Yaw Boamah 2:06 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, conditions of admissibility of
    Questions under Standing Order 67 (1)
    (b) provides that and I quote:
    A Question shall not contain any
    arguments, expression of opinion,
    inferences, imputations, epithets or
    controversial, ironical or offensive
    expressions or hypothetical cases;
    My good Friend from Adaklu, who
    accompanied the President to
    commission an €11.1 million project in his constituency yesterday is asking a
    question that does not conform with the
    rules of the House. Asking the Hon
    Minister about Article 181(5) is
    unrelated to the Question that has been
    filed. He asked the Hon Minister a
    Question and he has answered. If he
    wants to file a fresh question or seek
    proper opinion on Article 181 (5) with
    regard to the said relationship between
    McKinsey & Company Inc. and the
    Ministry, that is fine, but for the Hon
    Minister to come here and be ambushed
    this way is not in conformity with our
    rules.

    Oral Answers to Questions
    Mr Abgodza 2:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, indeed,
    yesterday, H. E. the President was in
    Adaklu to commission phase III of a
    project of which phases I and II have
    already been done and commissioned by
    former President John Dramani
    Mahama. We commend the President for
    continuing the project. However, large
    portions of the scope of the work were
    not done. So, the water is not yet at North
    Tongu and Ho West. We commend the
    President for doing a small portion of the
    work, which is also good. We thank the
    President.
    Mr Speaker, however, the reason I
    asked my question is this. The Hon
    Minister mentioned that there is a
    contract between the Government of the
    Ghana and a foreign entity up to 2022.
    We are in 2023, so Hon Colleagues are
    asking that if the Ministry is saying we
    are still in a relationship with this entity,
    then that must be part of the contract.
    This is because 2022 is past. We are
    asking for the details of that contract. It
    is not irrelevant at all.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Minority Chief Whip, your question is,
    was the contract approved by this
    House? And I would like you to leave it
    there.
    Mr Abgodza 2:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I just
    wanted to find out from the Hon Minister
    if it is an international contract and
    whether it was brought to the House.
    They could run away from the fact that it
    is a major question, but the truth is that
    the details will come out. So, he could
    decide to answer the question or say that
    I should file a substantive Question, but
    if Mr Speaker directs me, we shall file it.
    In any case, the Leader of the House is
    fond of actually determining which
    questions we ask in the House these
    days. He even goes on to make legal
    opinion on things that he is also making
    the same legal opinion on. The Leader of
    the House should allow you. You are a
    very respected lawyer. The Leader of the
    House and I are not yet lawyers. You
    have the capability of adjudicating on the
    issue I have raised with my respected
    Hon Colleague. I repeat, is the contract
    an international contract? Have they
    brought it to Parliament for ratification?
    We wait for the answer.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Minister, was the contract with
    McKinsey & Company Inc. brought to
    this House for approval or not?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    since my Hon Colleague is relating to
    Article 181 (5), he should go the whole
    gamut. What does it provide? Article 181
    (5) provides:
    This article shall, with the necessary
    modifications by Parlia-ment, apply
    to an international business or
    economic transaction to which the
    Government is a party as it applies
    to a loan.
    Mr Speaker, let the Hon Member tell
    us what modifications by Parliament has
    done — [Laughter] — before he relates to it. Parliament has not done the
    necessary modifications since 1993.

    Oral Answers to Questions

    Mr Speaker, I hear a chorus of “No! No!” from the former Deputy Attorney- General and Minister for Justice. He

    cannot prove me wrong. Parliament has

    not done the necessary modifications and

    I have been in this House, maybe, at

    least, a decade before the Hon Member

    came to Parliament, notwithstanding his

    position as a former Deputy Attorney-

    General and Minister for Justice — [Interruption]— [Laughter]

    Mr Speaker, the Hon Member cannot

    doubt what I am saying. He is saying that

    I should yield to him. I will and I would
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:16 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Member?
    Dr Dominic Akuritinga Ayine 2:16 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I know the Hon Majority
    Leader is the Lionel Messi of Suame
    politics but I think he should always back

    The reason is very simple. Article

    181(5) of the 1992 Constitution requires

    that Parliament should make the

    necessary modifications for the approval

    of international economic agreements.

    Parliament has been derelict since 1993

    and has not made the modifications but

    that does not mean that in the opinion of

    the drafters of the 1992 Constitution, the

    fact that Parliament has not acted means

    that those agreements should not be

    approved by Parliament.

    Mr Speaker, in any case, the Hon

    Majority Leader has been here longer

    than I have been but we have been

    approving international economic

    agreements under article 181(5) of the

    1992 Constitution. So, as a matter of

    practice and convention, despite the lack

    of modifications, we have been doing it

    here in the House.

    Mr Speaker, I think the Hon Minister

    is under obligation to answer the

    question asked by my Hon Leader.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    doing the wrong thing over several
    decades does not right that wrong thing
    we have been doing. I am asking the Hon
    Member what modifications we have
    done, and he is admitting that we have
    not done the modifications, yet he is
    saying that because we have been doing
    the wrong thing, we should continue on
    that trajectory. Is that a wholesome
    argument? That even though we admit
    that we have been doing the wrong thing,
    we should continue on that path?
    Mr Speaker, I think you should be
    urging us to purge ourselves — [An Hon Member: No, no, no!] — [Laughter]
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:16 p.m.
    Yes, I
    have heard enough of all the legal
    arguments by lawyers and non-lawyers —
    Dr Ayine 2:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:16 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, please, I have not given you the
    Floor. I have heard enough.
    Hon Deputy Minister, was this
    application brought to the House for
    approval or not? That is all.

    Oral Answers to Questions
    Dr Adam 2:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I do not
    remember but I will get the information
    later.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:16 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, we will move on to Question
    numbered 387, which stands in the name
    of the Hon Member for Keta Constituency,
    Mr Kwame Dzudzorli Gakpey.
    Yes, Hon Member?
    Measures to Save Ghana from
    Returning to the Money Laundering
    List of the Financial Action Taskforce
    Mr Kwame Dzudzorli Gakpey
    (NDC — Keta): Mr Speaker, I beg to ask the Hon Minister for Finance what
    measures the Government is putting in
    place to save Ghana from returning to the
    money laundering list of the Financial
    Action Task Force (FATF).
    Dr Adam 2:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, our
    experience with the Financial Action
    Task Force FATF “Grey List” requires us to continue to prioritise this issue.
    Ghana was first subjected to the Round
    of Mutual Evaluation by Inter-
    Governmental Action Group against
    Money Laundering and Terrorist
    Financing in West Africa (GIABA) in
    2009 and the country was subsequently
    blacklisted by FATF in February 2012.
    A second Round of Mutual Evaluation
    was carried out on Ghana in 2016 and
    though some progress had been made
    since 2009, strategic deficiencies
    remained. The 2016 evaluation formed
    the basis of Ghana being placed on the
    European Union's list of high-risk countries with strategic deficiencies in
    the Anti-Money Laundering Countering
    the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT)
    regime, what we call the FATF Grey
    List, in October 2020.
    Mr Speaker, informed by these
    developments, we acted swiftly and
    decisively, and accordingly, agreed on
    an action plan to address the identified
    deficiencies with FATF.
    Mr Speaker, by dint of hard work,
    Ghana completed the action plan ahead
    of schedule. At the June 2021 plenary
    meeting of FATF, it was unanimously
    agreed that Ghana had satisfactorily
    completed her action plan. Accordingly,
    Ghana was removed from the FATF list
    of jurisdictions under Increased
    Monitoring (Grey List).
    Mr Speaker, following Ghana's exceptional response and leadership in
    addressing this issue, [Emil Meddy], one
    of our officers with the Financial
    Intelligence Centre (FIC) was appointed
    as Co-Chair of the Africa/Middle East
    Joint Group of the International
    Cooperation Review Group (ICRG) of
    the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).
    Through this responsiveness, FATF and
    for that matter, the international
    community has renewed its confidence
    in Ghana's Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism
    (AML/CFT) regime.
    Mr Speaker, you may recall that in
    2020, we laid before this august House
    an Anti-Money Laundering Bill (2020)
    as part of measures to address some
    strategic deficiencies identified in our
    AML/CFT regime. Indeed, the passage

    Oral Answers to Questions

    of the Act was very instrumental in

    facilitating our exit from the FATF “grey list”. This was also a demonstration of Parliament's commitment towards strengthening the country's AML/CFT regime and we are most grateful to

    Parliament for the partnership.

    Mr Speaker, to sustain the progress

    made under FATF Observation Process,

    Government has ensured that adequate

    measures are in place to further

    strengthen our AML/CFT regime. This is

    a proactive measure to ensure that we do

    not end up on that list in the future.

    Accordingly, the following interventions

    have been pursued since we exited the

    “grey list”.

    i. Sensitisation on new Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2020 (Act 1044)

    Mr Speaker, following the passage of

    the Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2020

    (Act 1044) to address some technical

    deficiencies identified within our

    AML/CFT regime, the Financial

    Intelligence Centre (FIC) has organised

    series of sensitisation programmes to

    bring key provisions of the Act to the

    attention of key stakeholders, including,

    the Banks and Non-Bank Financial

    Institutions, Law Enforcement Agencies

    and Civil Society Organisations. It is

    expected that these programmes will

    enhance compliance within the industry.

    ii. Nationwide consultation on Non- Profit Organisation Bill (2021)

    Mr Speaker, a critical deficiency

    identified in our regime was the absence

    of a legal framework for Non-Profit

    Organisations (NPOs) operating. The

    contributions of NPOs to our socio-

    economic development is significant.

    However, it has become important

    globally to ensure that appropriate

    mechanisms are put in place to prevent

    the sector from abuse, especially for

    terrorist financing related activities.

    Even though, a directive for the

    management of NPOs was approved by

    Cabinet and is being implemented, there

    is the urgent need for a proper legal

    framework. Accordingly, an NPO Bill

    has been drafted and is undergoing

    nationwide consultation. Upon approval

    of Cabinet, the NPO Bill will be

    forwarded to Parliament for

    consideration. It is our expectation that,

    the House will help us enact the NPO

    Bill to strengthen the AML/CFT regime.

    iii. Resourcing the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC)

    Mr Speaker, the Financial Intelligence

    Centre, is the pivot institution around

    which the entire AML/CFT regime of the

    country revolves and therefore requires

    dedicated resources. In line with Section

    23 of the new Anti-Money Laundering

    Act, 2020 (Act 1044), the Bank of Ghana

    and the Ghana Revenue Authority are the

    two institutions mandated to provide

    sustained funding for the operations of

    the FIC.

    iv. Enhancing Risk-based Supervision

    Mr Speaker, risk-based supervision is

    a major concern. Therefore, measures

    are being put in place to enhance risk-

    based supervisory mechanisms of

    Oral Answers to Questions

    relevant sectors. For instance, in

    conjunction with our development

    partners, a risk-based supervisory

    manual has been developed to enhance

    supervision in the Designated Non-

    Financial Businesses and Professions

    (DNFBPs) sector like dealers in precious

    metals and stones, the real estate sector,

    casinos, et cetera.

    In the same way, supervisory

    mechanisms have been put in place for

    the Non-Bank Financial Institutions

    (NBFIs). The savings and loans

    companies, finance houses, rural and

    community banks and some

    microfinance institutions have all been

    registered on the FIC portal to help in

    their identification and supervision.

    Furthermore, to strengthen risk-based

    supervision, the technical team,

    including the FIC, BoG, SEC, NIC and

    the other supervisory bodies continue to

    undertake various sensitisation

    programmes geared towards achieving

    this goal.

    v. The Beneficial Ownership (BO) Disclosure Regime

    Mr Speaker, I am happy to inform this

    House that Ghana now has a beneficial

    ownership disclosure regime in place.

    The Registrar-General's Department, now the Office of the Registrar of

    Companies (ORS) has gone further to

    digitise the register to enhance its

    accessibility. The electronic register now

    allows for the filing and access of BO

    information online, which means that

    Ghana has established a BO register that

    is freely accessible by competent

    authorities and available to the public,

    thus fulfilling FATF requirements under

    recommendations 24 and 25.

    Mr Speaker, as at February 2023, there

    were at least eight African countries on

    the FATF Grey list (Burkina Faso,

    Democratic Republic of Congo, Mali,

    Nigeria, Senegal, South Sudan, Tanzania

    and Uganda). Mr Speaker, we know that

    being on the FATF Grey List or Blacklist

    has significant consequences for our

    economy as it questions the integrity of

    the country's financial environment and constrains foreign direct investments. It

    is for that reason that we have pursued

    these interventions to strengthen our

    AML/CFT regime, entrench the gains

    and ensure we do not return to negative

    FATF observation again.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:16 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Member, any follow-up question,
    please?
    Mr Gakpey 2:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the first
    strategy is “sensitisation on the new Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2020 (Act
    1044).”
    I would like to find out from the Hon
    Minister how this is being done in the
    country.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:26 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Minister?
    Dr Adam 2:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Financial
    Intelligence Centre (FIC) has organised
    series of sensitisation programmes to
    bring key provisions of the Act to the
    attention of key stakeholders, including,

    Oral Answers to Questions

    the banks and non-bank financial

    institutions, law enforcement agencies

    and Civil Society Organisations. It is

    expected that these programmes will

    enhance compliance within the industry.

    This is how far we have gone on the

    sensitisation on this matter.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:26 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Member?
    Mr Gakpey 2:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you
    very much. I would still move on with
    regard to sensitisation. Most of us here
    are also dealing with banks, but there is
    no point in time that any education
    regarding anti-money laundering issues
    based on the sensitisation — that is why I was asking which strategies are being
    used and how they are being carried out
    so that we know, and in case we also
    need to spread the information, then we
    do that. That is the why I am asking that,
    but the Answer provided for me is not
    detailed.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:26 p.m.
    You can
    ask further questions on it if you have.
    Mr Gakpey 2:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would like
    to find out from the Hon Minister how
    they are deploying Information
    Communication Technology (ICT) with
    regard to combatting these anti-money
    laundering issues in the country.
    Dr Adam 2:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the measures
    I mentioned including the sensitisations
    are by no means exhaustive, and
    therefore other measures such as the
    proposal to use ICT would be employed
    in order to ensure that we sensitise as
    many stakeholders as possible.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:26 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, your last question?
    Mr Gakpey 2:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, based on
    the information provided I would like to
    find out from the Hon Minister whether
    they are also employing the services of
    National Security and other security
    agencies with regard to the fight against
    the anti-money laundering system, and
    how are they doing that?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:26 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Minister?
    Dr Adam 2:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, if I got his
    question correctly, he is asking how we
    are involving the security agencies in this
    matter. I did not hear him correctly.
    Mr Speaker, the FIC is one of the
    security agencies of our country. To the
    extent that money laundering is a
    criminal act, all other security agencies
    are involved in this right, from the
    discussions of the Bill to the formulation
    of the Bill, and there are sections of the
    Act passed by Parliament which require
    the various agencies to play various roles
    in ensuring that we arrest money
    laundering in the country.
    Deputy Majority Leader (Mr
    Alexander Kwamena Afenyo-Markin):
    Mr Speaker, the Economic and
    Organised Crime Office (EOCO) is also
    in the fight against money-laundering
    but has prosecutorial powers including
    the power of arrest. I would like to ask

    Oral Answers to Questions

    the Hon Minister whether he would

    consider coming with an amendment to

    give FIC arresting powers. This is

    because in his Answer to the Hon

    Member for Keta, he indicated that

    money laundering is a crime and FIC

    operates under the space of the

    Intelligence Agency.

    Would he, in view of the situation,

    consider giving them the power to

    prosecute and the power of arrest in the

    law?
    Mr Agbodza 2:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, my very
    respected Deputy Leader is asking the
    Hon Minister whether he would consider
    bringing a law to this House to be passed.
    Mr Speaker, that is out of the domain
    of the substantive Question that has been
    asked. He can consider filing a
    substantive Question, but this is not a
    question that will follow a substantive
    Question, so I want you to rule him out
    asking him to file a substantive Question.
    The Hon Minister can actually ignore
    this particular question.
    Mr Samuel Atta Akyea and Mr
    Alexander K. Afenyo-Markin — rose —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:26 p.m.
    It is
    alright. I can — Hon Deputy Leader, please the question is not out of order.
    The main Question is the measures
    Government is putting in place to save
    Ghana from returning to the money
    laundering list. The follow-up question is
    whether they would consider giving
    arresting powers to the FIC which is the
    agency actually responsible for it, so the
    question is in order.
    Hon Minister, kindly answer.
    Dr Adam 2:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, even though
    the FIC is the lead as I indicated, the
    issue of money laundering is criminal,
    and the Act provides for roles to be
    played by other security agencies some
    of which have arresting powers or the
    power of prosecution.
    Mr Speaker, Government has not yet
    taken a decision to grant the FIC. When
    that decision is taken, an appropriate
    amendment will be brought to this House
    for consideration.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:26 p.m.
    Very well.
    I will move on. The Question
    numbered 388 by the Hon Member for
    Kwesimintsim, Dr Prince Hamidu
    Armah.
    Yes, Hon Member?
    Completion of CODA/IPEP Projects
    in Kwesimintsim
    Dr Prince Hamidu Armah (NPP — Kwesimintsim) 2:26 p.m.
    Thank you very much
    Mr Speaker for the opportunity to ask
    this Question that I filed two years ago. I
    filed this Question in June 2021.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to ask the Hon
    Minister for Finance what steps the
    Ministry is taking to ensure the
    completion of various projects in the
    Kwesimintsim Constituency initiated by
    the Coastal Development Authority

    Oral Answers to Questions

    (CODA) under the Infrastructure for

    Poverty Eradication Programme (IPEP).
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:26 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Minister?
    Dr Adam 2:26 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker,
    and many thanks to the Hon Member for
    Kwesimintsim, Dr Prince Hamidu
    Armah, for the Question.
    Mr Speaker, our commitment to
    equitable and balanced national
    development is strong and remains
    unchanged. This commitment has
    inspired us to ensure fair allocation and
    release of resources in accordance with
    the law and national policies. The
    Government established the Development
    Authorities and placed them under the
    Infrastructure for Poverty Eradication
    Programme (IPEP) to serve as strategic
    vehicles for addressing the gaps in
    development among urban, peri-urban
    and rural areas.
    Accordingly, we have continued to
    provide resources to enable the IPEP
    Secretariat support all the Development
    Authorities, including the Coastal
    Development Authority (CODA) under
    which the Kwesimintsim Constituency
    falls.
    In the year 2022, amidst the economic
    challenges, we released GH₵ 230,312,304.75 to support the
    implementation of the work programme
    of the Development Authorities.
    It is our expectation that the IPEP
    Secretariat will continue to work closely
    with CODA to complete all on-going
    projects, including those in the
    Kwesimintsim Constituency.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:36 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Member?
    Dr Armah 2:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, in the Hon
    Minister's response, he emphasised the fact that certain amounts of money were
    released in the year 2022 to support the
    implementation of the IPEP.
    Mr Speaker, indeed in my
    constituency, the contractor was paid
    moneys due him. Unfortunately, after
    receiving the payment, they abandoned
    site, and have since not returned. What is
    the Ministry doing to ensure that
    contractors who have received payment
    return to site?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:36 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, which agency is managing the
    contract? Is it the Ministry of Finance?
    Dr Armah 2:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the agency
    responsible is CODA, but considering
    the moneys that were released from the
    Ministry of Finance, I thought that the
    Ministry, in the interest of efficiency in
    public finance management, would take
    steps to ensure that agencies who have
    received money properly utilise it.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:36 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, kindly ask another question,
    please.
    Dr Armah 2:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, that would
    be all for now.

    Oral Answers to Questions
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:36 p.m.
    Very
    well.
    Mr A. Ibrahim — rose —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:36 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, this is a constituency-specific
    Question. It was in relation to his
    constituency. It is not a general one.
    Hon Members, the next Question is in
    the name of the Hon Member of
    Parliament for Ketu North, Mr James

    Very well. I will move on to the

    Question numbered 682, which stands in

    the name of the Hon Member of

    Parliament for Tolon, Mr Habib Iddrisu.

    Very well. I will move on to the

    Question numbered 906, by the Hon

    Member of Parliament for Kpando, Mrs

    Della Sowah.

    Yes, Hon Member, you may ask your

    Question.

    Government's Position on Cryptocurrency
    Mrs Della Adjoa Sowah (NDC — Kpando) 2:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to ask the
    Hon Minister for Finance what is
    Government's position on Cryptocurrency.
    Dr Adam 2:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thank the
    Hon Member of Parliament for Kpando,
    Mrs Della Sowah, for the Question.
    Mr Speaker, noting the increasing
    interest in “cryptocurrency” among some
    Ghanaian consumers and the inherent
    risks associated with these digital assets,
    Government has taken various steps to
    understand the implications of this
    emerging technology and explored
    various positions taken by different
    jurisdictions and key international
    standard-setting bodies such as Financial
    Action Task Force (FATF), Financial
    Stability Board (FSB) and Basel
    Committee on Banking Supervision
    (BCBS). This is to develop a
    comprehensive framework that
    addresses the regulatory concerns and
    risks associated with digital assets, as an
    outright ban appears potentially
    ineffective.
    Mr Speaker, we have in this year,
    witnessed the severe challenges faced by
    high profile US Banks: Silvergate,
    Republic Bank, and the Silicon Valley
    Bank (SVB) that are highly linked with
    the crypto industries. We have also seen
    the challenges faced by FTX in America
    since November 2022.
    Mr Speaker, these lessons reinforce
    Government's commitment to enhance the regulatory regime and provide timely
    advice and mitigation measures on the
    risks associated with this new
    technology.
    Mr Speaker, in the meantime, the
    Government will continue to allow
    associated technologies such as
    Blockchain and Distributed Ledger
    Technology (DLT) innovations in the
    sandbox as we explore the development
    of a framework. Until such a framework
    is in place, the Government would like to

    Oral Answers to Questions

    reiterate its directives conveyed in

    several notices, including one issued on

    March 9th, 2022, that all institutions

    licensed by BoG are prohibited from

    facilitating cryptocurrency transactions

    through their platforms or agent outlets.

    Mr Speaker, I thank you.
    Mrs Sowah 2:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thank the
    Hon Minister for his Answer, but I would
    like to know if there is a tentative
    framework in place to protect vulnerable
    Ghanaians.
    Dr Adam 2:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I know that
    the Bank of Ghana has been undertaking
    several measures, including sensitising
    citizens on the effects associated with the
    cryptocurrency issue and our position
    that the use of cryptocurrency platforms
    is prohibited. I am not aware of any
    comprehensive framework at the
    moment on this matter.
    Mrs Sowah 2:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would like
    to further ask that considering that
    people are desperate and are looking for
    alternative means of saving, what would
    happen to the economy if this thing turns
    out negatively, like somebody was duped
    recently of US$200,000.00 invested in
    bitcoin? How would the Ministry protect
    the country as a whole from such shocks?
    Dr Adam 2:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, because we do
    not yet have a comprehensive framework
    to address issues relating to
    cryptocurrency, we will continue to
    sensitise the people of Ghana, especially
    economic agents who are involved in
    huge transactions such as the amount
    mentioned by the Hon Member, in order
    to continue to discourage them from
    even considering the use of
    cryptocurrencies for such transactions,
    including transactions of a minor nature.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:36 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, are you done? — Very well.
    We will move to the Question
    numbered 911, to be asked by the Hon
    Member for Builsa South, Dr Clement
    Apaak.
    Cause of Huge Increase in Amount
    Invested in Free SHS
    Dr Clement Abas. Apaak (NDC — Builsa South) 2:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, my
    Question is not two years old, but I find
    the designation 911 very memorable on
    this historic day.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to ask the Hon
    Minister for Finance what accounted for
    the huge increase in the amount invested
    to implement the Free Senior High
    School (SHS) policy from GH₵3.2 billion since its inception, as reported in
    the 2020 Mid-Year Review of the
    Budget Statement and Economic Policy,
    to GH₵7.62 billion, as reported in the 2021 Mid-Year Fiscal Policy Review of
    the Budget Statement and Economic
    Policy.
    Dr Adam 2:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thank you
    and my Hon Brother, Dr Clement A.
    Apaak.
    Mr Speaker, one of the President's priorities is to protect the sovereign
    rights of the people to pursue dignified
    and fulfilling lives and in particular,

    Oral Answers to Questions

    ensure that our young people are

    equipped with the skillset to achieve

    social mobility. The Government of H.

    E. the President believes that the Free

    SHS policy sets a real solid foundation

    for our young people to compete in the

    global marketplace and reach even

    higher heights by the grace of God.

    Mr Speaker, it was in demonstration of

    this commitment that in the 2020 Mid-

    Year Fiscal Policy Review, we stated

    that, and I quote “we invested GH₵3.2 billion to implement Free SHS, resulting

    in over 1.2 million teenagers being in

    secondary school now, looking forward

    to better opportunities in life. For their

    parents and families, this has translated

    into GH₵2.2 billion in savings”.

    Mr Speaker, the 2021 Mid-Year Fiscal

    Policy Review discussed the sources of

    financing for the Free SHS programme

    in line with our interest in budget

    transparency. In that review, I stated that,

    and I quote, “over the five years, a total amount of GH₵7.62 billion has been allocated to implement the Free SHS

    Programme”.

    Mr Speaker, I indicated further that

    this cumulative allocation for the

    programme does not usually and

    naturally translate into the amount

    spent/invested in the Free SHS

    Programme for the two key reasons:

    i. How much we are able to spend/invest depends on revenue

    performance; and

    ii. Non-alignment of the financial and academic year, which

    requires that reconciliation

    occurs before amounts are fully

    paid (in the next financial

    year).

    Mr Speaker, in fact, by the end of

    2021, the cumulative amount invested in

    the Free SHS had reached GH₵5.3 billion and not GH₵7.62 billion as may have been represented.

    Mr Speaker, the increases in allocation

    is as a result of the increases in cohorts

    and enrolment. In the 2017/2018

    academic year, total enrolment was

    362,108 and this increased to 432,791 in

    the 2018/2019 academic year. By the

    2021/2022 academic year, enrolment

    reached 465,242. Subsequent allocations

    increased because the number of cohorts,

    and for that matter, the number of

    enrolments has been increasing.

    Mr Speaker, it is imperative to note

    that, the predictions made by some

    members of our society that the Free

    SHS policy will compromise the

    standards of our education have not

    manifested. On the contrary, the results

    under the Free SHS have shown a

    systematic improvement.

    The 2021 WASSCE results, the

    second batch of the “Akufo- Addo graduates”, shows 54.08 per cent of students recording A1-C6 in English,

    as opposed to 51.6 per cent in 2016;

    65.70 per cent recording A1-C6 in

    Integrated Science in 2021, as opposed to

    Oral Answers to Questions

    48.35 per cent in 2016; 54.11 per cent

    recording A1-C6 in Mathematics, as

    compared to 33.12 per cent in 2016; and

    66.03 per cent recording A1-C6 in Social

    Studies, as compared to 54.55 per cent in

    2016.

    Mr Speaker, as a result of this

    transformational and inclusive Govern-

    ment intervention, about two million

    young people have found a pathway to

    further education, training, apprentice-

    ship, employment and a potentially

    prosperous future.
    Dr Apaak 2:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, in the Hon
    Minister's Answer on page 34 of today's Order Paper, he indicates that the
    cumulative amount invested in the Free
    SHS programme has reached GH₵5.3 billion and not GH7.62 billion as may
    have been represented.
    My question is based on the figures
    provided to this House in response to a
    Question by my Hon Ranking Member,
    Mr Peter Nortsu-Kotoe, and this is
    contained in the Official Report of 22nd
    March, 2023. In response to Mr Nortsu-
    Kotoe's Question on expenditure on the
    Free SHS, the Hon Minister for
    Education provided a table which is
    under column 131.
    The table provides a column for
    allocation, total releases and total
    expenditure. Both total releases and total
    expenditure are in the range of GH₵5.1 billion for the year, 2017 to the year,
    2021. Could the Hon Minister for
    Finance explain to this House and to
    Ghanaians why the figure that he has
    provided today as the cumulative amount
    invested to implement the programme
    from the year, 2017 to the year 2021 is
    different from the figure provided by the
    Hon Minister for Education for the same
    period? What is the reason for the
    variance for the same activity for the
    same period under the same regime?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:46 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Minister, could you explain that?
    Mr Afenyo-Markin — rose —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:46 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Deputy Majority Leader?
    Mr Afenyo-Markin 2:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    respectfully, I would just like to draw the
    attention of my respected Hon Colleague
    to a preliminary matter. In his Question,
    his burden was premised on the Mid-
    Year Report of the year 2021, and for the
    avoidance of doubt, I would read it again.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:46 p.m.
    Hon
    Deputy Majority Leader, please. The
    Hon Deputy Minister can answer, so
    kindly allow him to, unless you are
    raising an objection based on the rules.
    Mr Afenyo-Markin 2:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    that is so.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:46 p.m.
    Kindly
    refer me to the rule.
    Mr Afenyo-Markin 2:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, my
    objection is grounded on the fact that in
    the Hon Member's Question, he premises the issue on the Mid-Year
    Report. However, he is referring to a

    Oral Answers to Questions

    Report by the Ministry of Education in a

    Hansard to contradict the Hon Minister.

    Reading the Question, I beg to quote;

    To ask the Minister for Finance

    what accounted for the huge

    increase in the amount invested to

    implement Free Senior High School

    from GH₵3.2 billion since its inception as reported in the 2020

    mid-year review of the Budget

    Statement and Economic Policy to

    GH₵7.62 billion as reported in the 2021 Mid-Year Fiscal Policy

    Review of the Budget Statement

    and Economic Policy.

    Mr Speaker, that is the burden of the

    Hon Member's contention, and I am saying that to ask a supplementary

    question premised on an Answer by the

    Hon Minister for Education to suggest

    that the Hon Minister for State is

    contradicting the Hon Minister for

    Education is misplaced, with respect.

    Therefore, if we would rely on Mid-

    Year Report — this is the Hon Member's Question, not mine, everything must be

    within the scope of this.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:46 p.m.
    Very well.
    Thank you, Hon Deputy Majority
    Leader.
    Hon Minister, kindly answer the
    question.
    Mr Buah — rose —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:46 p.m.
    Hon
    Deputy Minority Leader, I have admitted
    the question.
    Mr Buah 2:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I was simply
    going to add that in the Hon Minister's Answer, he acknowledges the exact issue
    in the question that was asked. He has
    given reasons for the increase, so for the
    — [Interruption] — Who is not following?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:46 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Deputy Minister?
    Dr Adam 2:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, respectfully, I
    do not have access to the reference the
    Hon Member premised his Question on,
    and I would appreciate looking at it
    before I could provide answers.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:46 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, do you have another question?
    Dr Apaak 2:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would make
    a copy of the Official Report available to
    the Hon Minister of State at the Ministry
    of Finance.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Minister of State
    admits that the total amount of GH₵7.62 billion has been allocated between the
    year, 2017 and the year, 2021 to fund the
    implementation of the Free SHS policy.
    With this in mind, I would like to ask
    the Hon Minister of State why the
    Government still owes National Food
    Buffer Stock Company Limited who
    supply food to our Senior High Schools

    Oral Answers to Questions

    an amount of GH₵198 million for which they have threatened not to supply food

    until they are paid.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, I am trying to understand how
    that is related to the Question that you
    asked. I cannot see how it is related to it.
    Mr Apaak 2:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, can I explain
    it?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:56 p.m.
    No, do not
    explain it. Re-arrange your supple-
    mentary question to make it relevant as a
    follow-up to the substantive Question
    you asked.
    Mr Apaak 2:56 p.m.
    Very well, Mr Speaker.
    With guidance from the Hon Ranking
    Member of the Committee, with this
    amount allocated to fund the programme,
    I would like to find out from the Hon
    Minister of State how the Ministry would
    address the current concerns raised by
    the National Buffer Stock Company
    (NAFCO) food suppliers in terms of
    Government's indebtedness to them.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, please, this is also another
    Question. If you have to ask Questions
    on the Ghana School Feeding
    Programme (GSFP) and NAFCO, file
    them. You asked for the budget
    arrangement, and it has been provided.
    Mr Apaak 2:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the NAFCO
    food suppliers supply food to the senior
    high schools, and feeding —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:56 p.m.
    How is
    that related to this budget Question you
    asked?
    Mr Apaak 2:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, that is the
    money that is supposed to be used to pay
    them. So, if we have GH₵7.62 billion and we have only utilised GH₵5.3 billion, there is a surplus to be able to pay
    them. So, the question I seek to ask is
    why they have not paid them.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, kindly file that question.
    Mr Apaak 2:56 p.m.
    Very well. I am grateful,
    Mr Speaker.
    Mr Eric Afful 2:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I have
    gone through the Answer provided by
    the Hon Minister of State. According to
    him, they needed GH₵7.62 billion within the five-year frame of the
    programme, and they were given
    GH₵5.26 billion, if I am correct. When we do the arithmetic, we have a
    GH₵2.32 billion deficit. So, my question to the Hon Minister of State is whether
    he is inferring that there is a financial
    challenge in respect of the imple-
    mentation of the Free SHS Programme.
    It is just a simple question.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, I do not think that you have
    read the Answer provided. Your question
    is out of order.
    Hon Members, we will move on to the
    Question numbered 921, which stands in
    the name of the Hon Member for
    Bibiani-Anhwiaso-Bekwai, Mr Alfred
    Obeng-Boateng.

    Oral Answers to Questions

    Measures to Prevent Directors and

    Shareholders Involved in Financial

    Crimes from Operating
    Mr Alfred Obeng-Boateng (NPP — Bibiani-Anhwiaso-Bekwai) 2:56 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I beg to ask the Hon Minister
    for Finance what the Ministry is doing to
    ensure that the individual directors and
    shareholders who were involved in
    committing various financial crimes
    which led to the revocation of their
    licences are not permitted to operate any
    regulated business in the country.
    Dr Adam 2:56 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker,
    and my Good Friend for the Question.
    Mr Speaker, following a successful
    clean-up of the banking sector, the
    Government embarked on several
    reforms to prevent former directors, key
    management personnel, and share-
    holders of defunct regulated institutions
    from operating in the banking sector. A
    number of rules, including the Corporate
    Governance Directive, and Fit and
    Proper Persons Directive were issued to
    ascertain the “fitness and propriety” of shareholders, directors and key
    management personnel in line with
    international best practices.
    Mr Speaker, specifically, the Fit and
    Proper Persons Directive has clear
    provisions on rules for the assessment of
    the “fitness and propriety” of share- holders, directors, and key management
    personnel, and provides conditions under
    which persons may be disqualified,
    including whether the person has been a
    director of or directly involved in the
    management of any company or
    institution.
    Mr Speaker, some of the specific
    issues of interest under this assessment
    are:
    i. licence has been revoked;
    ii. the bank being or has been wound up by a court of competent
    jurisdiction or another authority
    competent to do so within or
    outside Ghana; or
    iii. the bank gone into receivership, insolvency, or involuntary liquid-
    dation.
    Mr Speaker, to prevent the "recycling"
    of persons involved in the operations of
    banks and Specialised Deposit-taking
    Institutions (SDIs) that were put into
    receivership, the following processes are
    followed by the Bank of Ghana:
    i. Request confidential reports from the receivers of the defunct
    financial institutions in respect of
    prospective directors, key
    management personnel, and
    shareholders to ascertain their
    involvement, if any, in matters
    that led to the collapse of the
    relevant institutions;
    ii. Request confidential reports from the Financial Intelligence Centre
    (FIC) on the backgrounds,
    financial dealings, and other
    relevant activities of prospective
    shareholders, directors, and key

    Oral Answers to Questions

    management personnel of

    regulated financial institutions;

    iii. Interview all prospective directors, key management personnel, and

    shareholders of regulated financial

    institutions to ascertain their

    previous dealings in the financial

    sector, including defaulting on

    loans and other facilities from

    banks or SDIs, and to assess their

    level of appreciation of the rules

    that apply to banking, and the

    responsibilities and duties of key

    officers under the law;

    iv. Check the Bank of Ghana's database of past directors and key

    management personnel to confirm

    if any adverse findings have been

    recorded in the past;

    v. Check with other relevant financial sector regulators for confidential

    reports if a prospective

    shareholder, director or key

    management personnel of a bank

    or SDI has had any dealings in

    securities, insurance, or pensions

    sub-sectors that have been of

    concern.

    Mr Speaker, it is also pertinent to note

    that there are several shareholders,

    directors and key management personnel

    of the defunct institutions that are

    currently undergoing criminal pro-

    secution by the Attorney-General,

    following findings from criminal

    investigations conducted by relevant

    state agencies. Others are expected to be

    prosecuted by the Attorney-General in

    due course.

    Mr Speaker, the Bank of Ghana has

    provided significant support towards

    these criminal investigations and

    prosecutions, and expects that the

    remaining processes to complete this

    would be expedited by the State.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, please, your follow-up
    questions.
    Mr Obeng-Boateng 2:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    am done; I do not have any follow-up
    question. I would just like to make a
    comment or give the Hon Minister of
    State a message for his boss.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, this is Question Time; there is
    no space for comments.
    Mr Obeng-Boateng 3:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is
    related to the Question. As a result of
    these financial crimes committed by
    such individuals, a lot of investors have
    got their monies locked up, and they
    have still not been paid. So, they should
    speed up. I know they are still seeking a
    liquidation order in court, but they
    should speed up —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, I would convert that to a
    question for you.
    Hon Minister, of State what is the plan
    of the Ministry to deal with the locked-
    up capital of customers of defunct
    financial institutions?

    Oral Answers to Questions
    Dr Adam 3:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I know that
    some of them who were supposed to be
    paid have been paid. I do not have the
    number of total payments made to them.
    In addition to the assurance that
    Government would protect their savings,
    some banks that were liquidated were
    also given to different management to
    manage, and to date, some of them are
    doing very well. As to the details in the
    protection of the customers, Mr Speaker,
    we could provide that later.
    Thank you.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Very well.
    The last one.
    Yes, Hon Deputy Majority Leader?
    Mr Afenyo-Markin 3:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    would like the Hon Minister of State to
    allay the fears of those whose funds have
    been locked up. How assured should
    they feel that they would have their funds
    paid to them?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    I think the
    Answer he gave covers your question.
    He has already given assurance that he
    does not have the details, but he has told
    us what steps Government has taken
    already and what plans there are.
    Mr Afenyo-Markin 3:06 p.m.
    So, Mr Speaker,
    in other words, he is assuring the
    Ghanaian populace that those — [Interruption] —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    I know
    why those Hon Members are agitated.
    Mr Afenyo-Markin 3:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the
    Hon Minister for Finance has the
    mandate to do so because he holds the
    purse. So, what I would like to know
    from the Hon Minister of State is that,
    from what he just said, should we feel
    assured, so that we communicate to
    constituents who have their funds locked
    up?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    I think he
    has given the assurance already. Yes,
    Hon Minister of State, do you want to say
    something?
    Dr Adam 3:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I have already
    indicated that Government has paid a
    significant number; I could provide the
    number later. However, as to those who
    have not yet been paid, there is no reason
    Government would pay some and not
    pay others. I believe that due processes
    are being followed, and in due course,
    they would be paid.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Very well.
    The last question is Question number
    1791, which stands in the name of the
    Hon Member for Ketu South, Ms Abla
    Dzifa Gomashie.
    Status of the Feasibility Study on the
    Coastal Shoreline of Ghana
    Ms Abla Dzifa Gomashie (NDC — Ketu South) 3:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to ask
    the Minister for Finance the status of the
    feasibility study on the coastal shoreline
    of Ghana as captured in the 2022 Budget.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Minister of State.

    Oral Answers to Questions
    Dr Adam 3:06 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker,
    and Ms Abla Dzifa Gomashie for the
    Question.
    Mr Speaker, Government has demon-
    strated remarkable commitment to the
    development of coastal communities in
    honour of our pledge for the equitable
    prosperity of our country.
    In pursuit of this pledge, the Ministry
    of Finance sought and received parliamentary permission to modify the 2022 Budget Statement to address the critical challenges of the coastal communities in Ghana. This was to provide a more comprehensive solution (that is, to mitigate erosion, ease tidal flooding, enhance sanitary conditions and stimulate economic growth) and protect Ghana's 540km of coastline, including the 149km between Aflao and Prampram.
    Mr Speaker, among the modifications
    was the budgetary allocation of at least, GH₵10 million to complete the feasibility and engineering studies for the coastal communities adversely affected by tidal waves, which rendered about 3,000 people homeless in the Keta, Ketu South, and Anlo Constituencies, including Blekusu.
    Mr Speaker, I can report that the
    feasibility study has been conducted and the Feasibility Study Report (FSR) was submitted to the Public Investment Programme Working Committee (PIPWC), a statutory committee under the Legislative Instrument (L. I. 2411) on 9th March, 2023, in compliance with Regulation 9(a) of the Public Financial Management (Public Investment
    Management) Regulations, 2020 (L. I. 2411). Based on the recommendations of the PIPWC conveyed in a letter dated 22nd May, 2023, a Seal of Quality for the project has been issued.
    Ms Gomashie 3:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, would the Hon Minister of State say that there is a possibility of him incorporating in the mid-year review of the Budget Statement that is going to be read, issues that have been addressed in the Report that he mentioned?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Sorry, I did not get the question.
    Ms Gomashie 3:06 p.m.
    My question is the
    Hon Minister of State admits that the
    Report is ready, I am asking whether the
    solutions to the issues in the Report
    during the feasibility study find presence
    in the mid-year review of the Budget
    Statement that would be read?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Minister of State?
    Dr Adam 3:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am unable to
    tell what the content of the mid-year
    review would be as Government is still
    consulting on the issues that would
    eventually be the content of the mid-year
    review.
    Also, the mid-year review, as we
    know, is to review our past performance
    and also chart the path for the future, but
    as far as fiscal implications are
    concerned, that is something we continue
    to debate.

    Oral Answers to Questions

    So, Mr Speaker, I can assure Ms

    Gomashie that the Report would be acted

    on, but as to the content of the mid-year

    review of the Budget Statement, I am

    unable to disclose that.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Member, any more questions?
    Ms Gomashie 3:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, is there a
    possibility that if it does not find space
    within the mid-year review of the Budget
    Statement as the Hon Minister of State
    has indicated he would assist the people
    of Ketu South and me, and push it to the
    2024 Budget Statement, and also, could
    he make the Report available to me?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, the Report may be ready, but
    only the financial part may be covered by
    the mid-year budget review as to whether
    money was released to it or not. So, I
    suggest that you work with them to get
    the content and probably seek assistance
    as to how they would provide further
    money. However, even if he answers it,
    it may not be helpful. So, I suggest that
    you leave it here and —
    Ms Gomashie 3:06 p.m.
    There was a second
    part which was for a copy of the Report.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    I think
    that would be helpful. Very well.
    Mr Kpodo — rose —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Member for Ho Central, also known as
    Ho peee?
    Mr Benjamin Komla Kpodo 3:06 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I have authority from the Hon
    Member for Ketu North, Mr James
    Avedzi Klutse —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, you are out of order. We are on
    one question; we have not closed it.
    Mr Kpodo 3:06 p.m.
    I thought you had finished
    with her.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    No.
    Kindly resume your seat. Yes, Hon
    Member for Awutu-Senya West?
    Mrs Gizella Tetteh-Agbotui 3:06 p.m.
    Thank
    you, Mr Speaker. The sub-committee of
    the Committee on Works and Housing,
    of which I am a member, inspected the
    entire coastline from Ketu South all the
    way to Axim. So, I am trying to fish out
    when this Report would also get to the
    Committee on Works and Housing. We
    also have a direct interest in this because
    this comes under Works. I would like the
    Hon Minister of State to give an
    indication of where this is because this is
    news to me, and I am sure it is news to
    any other Member of the Committee who
    is here.
    Thank you.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:06 p.m.
    Well, at
    least, a Member asked the Question, so it
    means she knows that work has been
    done. The Ministry is only providing
    financing. I am sure the Report would
    finally come to the Ministry of Works
    and Housing, so do not be in a hurry; it
    would come there.

    Oral Answers to Questions

    Very well. Hon Members —

    Mr Kpodo — rose —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:16 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, you now want to seek
    permission to ask the Question on behalf
    of the Hon Member for Ketu North, but I
    would not grant the permission. We have
    already exceeded the one hour which is
    allowed for Questions. So, the Answer to
    the Question asked by the Hon Member
    is provided in the Order Paper and that
    should be sufficient.
    On that note, that brings us to the end
    of Question time. Hon Minister of State,
    we thank you for attending upon the
    House to answer our Questions. You are
    discharged.
    Mr Afenyo-Markin — rose —
    Mr Afenyo-Markin 3:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, if
    you would be pleased, we would take the
    item numbered 17, Motions.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:16 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, we would take the item
    numbered 17, Motions. The Hon Second
    Deputy Speaker to take the Chair. Is the
    Hon Minister for Lands and Natural
    Resources here to move the Motion?
    Mr Agbodza — rose —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:16 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Minority Chief Whip?
    Mr Agbodza 3:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I cannot
    see the Hon Minister for Lands and
    Natural Resources in the House. We
    have spent a lot of the day doing other
    things, but I was hoping the Hon Deputy
    Majority Leader would make an
    application. He just made a request for us
    to do the item numbered 17 and sat
    down, and when you asked for the Hon
    Minister and I told him that his Minister
    is not here, he was making all sorts of
    gestures without the microphone that I
    do not even understand.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:16 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Deputy Majority Leader?
    Mr Afenyo-Markin 3:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the
    Hon Minister is unavoidably absent. He
    is a regular Member of this House, and
    when I say “a regular Member”, I mean to say that he is an Hon Member of
    Parliament, and when it comes to his
    ministerial functions, he is always
    punctual in attending upon the House,
    but on this occasion, he pleads to be
    excused from attending upon the House.
    He, however, does not leave us empty.
    With your leave, Mr Speaker, his abled
    Hon Deputy Minister, who is an
    experienced parliamentarian and well-
    versed with the jurisprudence of the
    House, is able to discharge that duty in
    his stead. With your leave, Mr Speaker,
    the able Hon Deputy Minister is
    available and I hope that with the
    cooperation and indulgence of my Hon
    Colleagues on the other Side, he will be
    able to discharge that duty. — [Interruption] — No, I am not doing so.

    Oral Answers to Questions

    Mr Speaker, I said that with your

    cooperation and indulgence, the —

    Mr Agbodza — rose —
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:16 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Minority Chief Whip?
    Mr Agbodza 3:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, on this
    occasion, we shall cooperate, but not all
    the time.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:16 p.m.
    Let me
    observe that when I came in in the
    morning, the Hon Minister was in the
    House, so I think he left after the short
    break.
    Hon Deputy Minister, you may move
    the Motion.
    3.20 p.m. — [MR SECOND DEPUTY

    BILLS — SECOND READING

    Wildlife Resources Management

    Bill, 2022

    Mr Benito Owusu Bio (Deputy

    Minister for Lands and Natural

    Resources) on behalf of the Minister:
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move 3:16 p.m.
    That the Wildlife Resources
    Management Bill, 2022 be now read a
    Second time. I so move.
    [Pause] — [Interruption] — I said it. Mr Speaker, I so move. — [Interruption] — [Laughter] —
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Deputy Majority
    Leader is out of order. He wants me to be
    wild, but that is not my usual self.
    Mr Speaker, I so move.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:16 p.m.
    Very
    well. Yes, Hon Chairman?
    Mr Francis Manu-Adabor
    (Chairman of the Committee): Mr
    Speaker, I beg to second the Motion, and
    with your permission, I present your
    Committee's Report. I will read only the introduction and conclusion of the
    Report, and I request the Hansard
    Department to capture the entire Report
    as having been read.
    1.0 Introduction
    2.1 The Wildlife Resources
    Management Bill, 2022 was laid in
    Parliament by the Hon Minister for
    Lands and Natural Resources, Hon
    Samuel Jinapor on 14th February, 2023.
    The Bill was thereafter read the First
    time and referred to the Committee on
    Lands and Forestry for consideration and
    report in accordance with article 106(4)
    and (5) of the 1992 Constitution and
    Order 177 of the Standing Orders of the
    House.
    2.0 Deliberations
    2.1 The Bill was originally laid in
    Parliament on 3rd March, 2022 before it
    was withdrawn and re-laid. After the
    referral of the original Bill, the
    Committee caused to be published in the
    newspapers an invitation to the general
    public to submit Memoranda. The

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    Committee then held a Stakeholders' Forum to discuss the Memoranda

    received from the public. The Committee

    received and analysed Memoranda from

    Civil Society Organisations (CSOs)

    involved in environmental conservation.

    2.2 In the first instance, the Committee

    met with the Hon Minister for Lands and

    Natural Resources, Officials of the

    Ministry and the Forestry Commission to

    consider the Bill. The recommendations

    and the inputs made during this meeting

    culminated into the redrafting of the Bill.

    2.3 Upon the withdrawal and relaying

    of the new Bill, the Committee

    proceeded to review the Bill with the

    Stakeholders.

    2.4 The Committee expresses its

    profound gratitude to the Hon Minister

    and the Officials for assisting in the

    Committee's deliberations.

    3.0 Reference Documents

    The Committee referred to the following

    documents during the deliberations:

    i. The 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana;

    ii. The Standing Orders of Parliament;

    iii. The Forestry Commissions Act, 1999 (Act 571);

    iv. The Wild Animals Preservation Act, 1961 (Act 43);

    v. The Wildlife Conservation Regulations, 1971 (L.I. 685);

    vi. The Wildlife Reserves Regulations,

    1971 (L I 710);

    vii. The Importation and Exportation of Parrots (Prohibition)

    Regulations, 1980 (L I 1240);

    viii. The Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992;

    ix. The Revised African Convention on the Conservation of Nature

    and Natural Resources, 2017;

    and

    x. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of

    Wild Fauna and Flora, 1973.

    4.0 Background Information

    The current legislative framework

    which governs the management of the

    country's wildlife resources includes the Wild Animals Preservation Act, 1961

    (Act 43), the Wildlife Conservation

    Regulations, 1971 (L.I. 685) and the

    Wildlife Reserves Regulations, 1971

    (L.I. 710).

    These laws, which were enacted over

    50 years ago, have now been found to be

    deficient and outdated. These laws

    predate both the 1974 and 1994 Wildlife

    Conservation Policies and do not address

    cardinal issues like community

    participation in wildlife management or

    the private sector involvement in the

    wildlife industry.

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    The name and terminology of the law,

    Act 43, is itself archaic and fails to

    recognise the new thinking in wildlife

    conservation. “Wild Animals Preservation” focuses on fauna and neglects flora and fails to give

    recognition to the fact that conservation

    of the habitat of wild animals is essential

    to the conservation of the animals.

    “Preservation” does not also reflect the current concept of wildlife management.

    Recent efforts to update the law on

    wildlife include the enactment of the

    Forestry Commission Act, 1999 (Act

    571) which provides for the regulation of

    the utilisation of forest and wildlife

    resources, the conservation and

    management of those resources and

    coordination of policies related to those

    resources. This Bill therefore sets out in

    detail, the functions of the Commission,

    aimed at achieving the objects of the

    Commission with respect to wildlife as

    specified in section 2 of Act 571.

    Furthermore, various international

    organisations to which Ghana belongs

    have published principles and guidance

    on forest management which Ghana has

    endorsed but are not reflected in the

    current legislation. Hence this Bill seeks

    to bring our wildlife administration

    abreast with current management

    structures and best practice, and to

    involve the various wildlife hosts

    communities in the management of

    wildlife resources.

    5.0 Object of the Bill

    The Bill seeks to consolidate and

    revise the laws relating to wildlife and

    protected areas; provide for the

    implementation of international

    conventions on wildlife to which Ghana

    is a signatory and for related matters.

    6.0 Observations

    The Committee made the following

    observations during the deliberations:

    6.1 Incorporation of Relevant

    International Conventions

    Ghana is a member of international

    organisations which have published

    principles and guidelines on forest

    management. While these published

    principles are endorsed by Ghana they

    are not reflected in current legislation.

    The provisions of the Convention on

    Biological Diversity, 1992, African

    Convention on the Conservation of

    Nature and Natural Resources, 2003, and

    the Convention on International Trade in

    Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and

    Flora, 1973 were ratified by Ghana in

    August 1994, June 2007 and February

    1976 respectively but are not

    incorporated in the laws that govern the

    management of wildlife resources.

    6.2 Current Practices in Wildlife

    Conservation

    The Committee noted that the existing

    laws governing wildlife and protected

    areas are outdated in view of current

    trends in these areas. These laws

    comprise the Wild Animals Preservation

    Act, 1961 (Act 43), the Wildlife

    Conservation Regulations, 1971 (L.I.

    685) and the Wildlife Reserves

    Regulations, 1971 (L.I. 710) which were

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    passed over 50 years ago. Thus, the

    concept of wildlife management has

    evolved globally and yet Ghana's laws on wildlife do not recognise the new

    thinking in wildlife conservation. The

    terminologies of Act 43 do not reflect the

    current concept of wildlife management.

    The Act focuses only on fauna and

    neglects flora. Furthermore, it does not

    cover the conservation of the habitat of

    wild animals which is essential to the

    conservation of these animals.

    6.3 Protection of Wild Animals

    The Committee noted that the Bill has

    greatly increased the scope of protection

    of wild animals. The Bill provides for

    increased list of protected wild animals

    and prohibits their capture or destruction

    without the authorisation of the Chief

    Executive of the Forestry Commission.

    The first category comprises the list of

    fully protected wild animals that cannot

    be hunted, captured or destroyed without

    the authorisation of the Chief Executive

    for the purpose of conservation,

    scientific research or captive breeding.

    The second category is made up of

    partially protected wild animals that

    cannot be hunted, captured or destroyed

    between 1st August and 1st December of

    each year.

    6.4 Licences and Permits

    The Committee again noted the

    introduction of new licences and permits

    in conformity with best international

    practices. The Bill provides for issuances

    of licences for specified activities

    including hunting or capturing of

    partially protected animals, trading in

    bush meat derived from partially

    protected animals, keeping of wild

    animals as pets, breeding of wildlife in

    captivity, and establishment of

    zoological gardens and wildlife reserves.

    Permits would be required for the export

    and import of wildlife and wildlife

    products, the group hunt and capturing of

    wild animals as part of cultural festivals

    and propagation of wild plants. These

    licences and permits comply with

    Ghana's international obligations contained in the Convention on

    Biological Diversity, 1992, and the

    Revised African Convention on the

    Conservation of Nature and Natural

    Resources, 2017.

    6.5 Community Participation and

    Private Sector Involvement in Wildlife

    Management

    The Committee also noted that the

    current laws on wildlife and protected

    areas do not make provisions for

    communities and the private sector

    involvement in wildlife management. As

    the current laws predate both the 1974

    and 1994 Wildlife Conservation

    Policies, they do not address cardinal

    issues like community participation in

    wildlife management or the involvement

    of the private sector in the wildlife

    industry. The Bill therefore will permit

    communities and the private sector to

    actively participate in the management

    of wildlife and protected areas.

    6.6 Functions of Forestry

    Commission under the Bill

    The Committee observed that the Bill

    makes a detailed provision for the

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    functions of the Commission which aims

    to achieve the objectives of the

    Commission with respect to Wildlife as

    specified in section 2 of the Forestry

    Commission Act, 1999 (Act 571). The

    existing Act does not make provision for

    the Commission's functions with regards to wildlife while in Clause 4 of the Bill,

    the functions of the Commission are

    clearly spelt out with regards to wildlife

    management and development. Among

    these functions, the Commission would

    be mandated to identify additional

    protected areas to ensure adequate

    protection and representation of the

    biophysical heritage of Ghana, provide

    migration corridors and address other

    ecosystemic demands necessary to the

    life cycle of wildlife. This function

    emphasises the obligation of Ghana

    under the Revised African Convention

    on the Conservation of Nature and

    Natural Resources 2017, to regularly

    assess the potential impact and the

    necessity of establishing additional

    conservation areas.

    6.7 Training and Protection of

    Wildlife Officers

    Officials of the Ministry of Lands and

    Natural Resources told the Committee of

    recent attacks on wildlife officers which

    had resulted in deaths in some cases. It

    was refreshing to note that provisions

    have been made in the Bill to strengthen

    the current regime of training and

    general protection of wildlife officers.

    The Bill would empower the Forestry

    Commission to arrange training for its

    paramilitary staff and equip them to

    perform their duties. The Committee has

    further proposed an amendment to

    ensure that the paramilitary personnel of

    the Forestry Commission are well

    equipped including the provision of

    arms.

    6.8 Honorary Wildlife Officers

    The Committee noted the provision

    made for the appointment of honorary

    wildlife officers by the Forestry

    Commission to assist in the performance

    of the functions of the Commission.

    While appreciating the need to

    encourage private individuals to assist

    the Forestry Commission, the

    Committee proposes that the

    Commission should be well resourced to

    improve its staff strength to the level

    necessary for full and effective

    performance of its functions. To this end,

    the Committee has recommended for the

    deletion of clause 32(3) of the Bill.

    7.0 Proposed Amendments

    The Committee's proposed amendments are contained in the

    Appendix.

    8.0 Conclusion and

    Recommendation

    The Committee has duly scrutinised

    the Wildlife Resources Management

    Bill, 2022 in the light of the 1992

    Constitution and other existing laws. The

    Committee takes the considered view

    that the eventual enactment of the Bill

    will ensure effective management of the

    country's wildlife resources in accordance with international best

    practices and also promote private sector

    investment in the sector.

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    In that regard, the Committee

    recommends to the House to adopt this

    Report and pass the Wildlife Resources

    Management Bill, 2022 in accordance

    with article 106 of the 1992 Constitution.

    Respectfully submitted.

    APPENDIX: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

    i. Clause 4 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (1), paragraph (g), line 2, before “resources” insert “wildlife”.

    ii. Clause 8 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (1), renumber paragraphs.

    iii. Clause 8 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (4), paragraph (b), line 2, after “conservation”, insert “of”.

    iv. Clause 10 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (2), paragraph (d), line 2, after “Executive Director”, insert “with the approval of the Commission”.

    v. Clause 11 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (8), paragraph (b), delete “vegitation”, and insert “vegetation”.

    vi. Clause 14 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (4), line 2, delete “reviewed and”

    vii. Clause 14 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (5), line 1, delete “five” and insert “ten”.

    viii. Clause 16 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (1), line 4, delete “community” and insert “area”.

    ix. Clause 16 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (2), paragraph (d), lines 2 and 3, delete “the contents of which shall be prescribed by Regulations”.

    x. Clause 16 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (2), paragraph (e), Subparagraph (i), delete and insert the following:

    “(i) traditional decision-making structures; and

    (ii) local land tenure system in the area for which the Community Resource

    Management Area is established; and;

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    xi. Clause 22 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (2), paragraph (a), after “import”, insert “wildlife and”.

    xii. Clause 23 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (11), line 2, after “may”, insert “within fourteen days”.

    xiii. Clause 23 — Amendment proposed — After subclause (11), insert a new subclause as follows:

    (…) The Commission shall, within fourteen days after receipt of an appeal for review, review the decision and communicate the response to the

    applicant.”

    xiv. Clause 24 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (4), line 2, after “may”, insert “within fourteen days”.

    xv. Clause 24 — Amendment proposed — After subclause (4), insert a new subclause to read as follows:

    (…) The Commission shall, within fourteen days after receipt of an appeal for review, review the decision and communicate the response to the

    applicant.” xvi. Clause 25 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (4), paragraph

    (a), subparagraph (i), line 1, delete “a specie” and insert “species”.

    xvii. Clause 25 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (4), paragraph (a), subparagraph (ii), line 1, delete “a specie” and insert “species”.

    xviii. Clause 25 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (4), paragraph (a), subparagraph (iii), line 1, delete “a specie” and insert “species”.

    xix. Clause 32 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (3), delete.

    xx. Clause 37 — Amendment proposed — Subclause (1), paragraph (k), delete.

    xxi. Clause 38 — Amendment proposed — Delete definition of “honorary officer”.

    xxii. Clause 38 — Amendment proposed — Delete the definition of “licence” and insert the following:

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    xxiii. “licence” means a written authorisation granted by the Commission for the activities specified in subsection (1) of section 22;”

    xxiv. Clause 38 — Amendment proposed — Insert the definition the following definitions:

    “District Assembly” includes a Municipal Assembly and a Metropolitan Assembly;

    “Ecosystem services” means the processes and inputs that nature provides to humans including

    a. provisioning services such as the provision of food, water, energy, raw materials and medicinal resources;

    b. regulating services such as climate regulation, flood protection, erosion regulation, pest and disease control and pollution control;

    c. supporting services such as the provision of shelter and habitat for flora and fauna, water cycle and carbon cycle; and

    d. cultural services such as provision of aesthetic, spiritual, recreational and tourism services;

    “permit” means a written authorisation granted by the Commission for the activities specified in section 22;”
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:16 p.m.
    Very
    well. Hon Members, the Motion has been
    moved and seconded by the Hon
    Chairman of the Committee. Pursuant to
    Standing Order 127, we are to take a full
    debate on the principles of the Bill and,
    therefore, I will invite Hon Members
    who are interested to debate the Bill.
    Dr Pelpuo — rose —
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:26 p.m.
    The
    first person to catch my eye is the Hon
    Member for Wa Central.
    Yes, Hon Member for Wa Central?
    Yes, we are debating the Report.

    Dr Abdul-Rashid Hassan Pelpuo

    (NDC — Wa Central): Mr Speaker, I would like to contribute to the Report of

    the Committee on the Wildlife

    Resources Management Bill, 2022. This

    Bill is important because it has a lot of

    value that goes beyond Ghana. In order

    for us to grasp the essence of it, it was

    necessary for us to open it up, so we

    invited the public to contribute to it to

    enhance the quality we wanted and also,

    to involve the generality of the people of

    Ghana. This is because we are here to

    cure an evil in the present legal system

    because of the generally aged nature of

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    it. For 50 years, there have been laws on

    wildlife, and those laws are not enough.

    They have not gone far enough to cure

    the fact that we would be reflecting on

    the present international legal system on

    wildlife.

    Mr Speaker, focusing on it, the

    essence of this present law would take

    more consideration on not just the fauna,

    but also the flora. In the past, it was about

    plants, but today, we are merging the

    plants, and curing the problem of

    securing protection of plants and animals

    life, which is in accordance with the

    present situation we find ourselves. The

    increase in scope in the protection of

    wildlife would ensure that we do not

    have our people go into the forest to

    destroy, capture or even handle animals

    the way they want. It is all going to be

    within a certain legal frame, which

    would allow for the forest and lives to be

    protected, and also, to ensure that we

    have more benefits in securing the

    forests and wildlife.

    So, now, the present law would ensure

    that in order for one to go into the forest

    to kill, consume or destroy any life, it

    must be with the exclusive permission of

    the Chief Executive, who would make

    sure one is given the permission to do a

    specific thing, and if permission is to be

    given to someone, there are a number of

    things he or she would be given

    permission to do: maybe, to ensure that it

    is in line with the conservation attempt

    by the state, scientific research or captive

    breeding - if one wants to breed, he or she would capture something and breed

    it. So, these are very important indicators

    that one can find in the Bill, and we

    believe if the Bill is captured properly

    and passed, we would have a situation

    where people can now conserve, protect,

    breed, and possibly, sell wildlife

    internally or export them.

    Mr Speaker, these things were not in

    the specifications of the old law; today,

    we would have them all captured in the

    law, so we have a situation where,

    according to the Convention signed in

    1994, Ghana would be within the scope

    of operations of how wildlife is kept. So,

    it is a very important Bill, and I would

    urge my Hon Friends to support these

    principles that we are projecting, so we

    can pass the Bill into law to ensure that

    the quality of conservation of wildlife in

    Ghana is enhanced, and that we would

    also be within the scope of international

    convention and principles which governs

    wildlife.
    Alhaji Collins Dauda 3:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:26 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, I have not called you — [Laughter] — Hon Member, let us hear from you.
    Alhaji Collins Dauda (NDC — Asutifi South) 3:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you
    for giving me the opportunity to
    contribute to this debate.
    Mr Speaker, the Bill satisfies the
    standard set out under article 106(2) of
    the 1992 Constitution. It details out the
    policies and principles, and, also
    identifies the weaknesses of the existing
    laws and provides remedies to address
    the weaknesses. Wildlife policy has

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    moved from protection to conservation,

    and, today, we are being called upon to

    pass a law that would enable us manage

    wildlife resources in a sustainable

    manner.

    Mr Speaker, wildlife resources are

    being managed by the Wildlife Division

    of the Forestry Commission of Ghana, so

    they have the responsibility to manage

    wildlife resources in a sustainable

    manner. There is a lot this country can

    benefit from wildlife resources,

    particularly in the area of revenue

    generation. We have failed in this effort.

    Other countries like Kenya, Tanzania

    and Botswana generate a lot of revenue

    from wildlife resources through

    ecotourism. Here, we have a lot of

    resources; we have the Mole National

    Park, and Digya National Park. I wanted

    to bring to this House pictures of animals

    that have been taken in the Mole

    National Park, yet we do not generate

    enough.

    Mr Speaker, I checked how much this

    country generated by way of revenue

    from the Mole National Park, and I was

    told that we generated only GH₵800,000 from a national park that has a lot of

    elephants, lions, tigers, pythons. This is

    because we have not developed the park

    to the standard that would attract tourists

    to the place. We would rather go to

    Nairobi in Kenya, where they do not

    have as many animals as we do.

    Mr Speaker, it is instructive to know

    that the Forestry Commission established

    by the Forestry Commission Act, 1999,

    (Act 571), was not the first established.

    The first Forestry Commission Act

    established under the Fourth Republic

    was in 1993, and, in that Act, Forestry

    Department, the Wildlife Department,

    Timber Export Development Board, and

    Timber Inspections Bureau were all

    independent of the Forestry Commission.

    Therefore, it became almost impossible

    for the Commission to work effectively.

    So, in 1999, the Ministry of Lands and

    Natural Resources brought to this House

    another Bill to re-establish the Forestry

    Commission with the view to bringing

    all these independent agencies under the

    Forestry Commission. That was the first

    object of the law at the time: to bring all

    the divisions under the Forestry

    Commission for efficient management.

    Mr Speaker, the second one was that

    when that arrangement was in place, the

    Forestry Commission would be able to

    generate resources to take care of

    administration and operational expenses

    of the Commission. So, when the law

    was passed in 1999 and the new Forestry

    Commission was established, in our

    Budget for the year 2000, we did not

    provide for Forestry Commission. They

    were able to generate revenue to take

    care of their expenses. Government was

    not subventing the Forestry Com-

    mission, and that was the idea. The idea

    was to harness resources in forestry to be

    able to generate resources. In the area of

    forestry, we have done well, but in the

    area of wildlife, nothing has happened.

    We have not done anything.

    Mr Speaker, we still have not lost it

    completely because the reserves are still

    there. The Mole National Park and Digya

    National Park are still there. We can

    develop these part. In this country, what

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    we do is that we use the cheapest way to

    generate revenue and increase taxes; that

    is what we do.

    Mr Speaker, the Forestry Commission

    has a duty to invest resources in the Mole

    National Park. If they cannot get

    sufficient money, in its Act, section 19

    provides for the funds of the Forestry

    Commission, and it identifies loans as

    one of the revenues available to the

    Commission. In section 21, they are

    allowed to borrow — that is their borrowing powers — from outside to develop the Mole National Park, so I

    suggest to the Hon Deputy Minister for

    Lands and Natural Resources, who

    feebly moved the Motion, to take note of

    these provisions and generate or provide

    resources for the development of these

    reserves.

    Mr Speaker, the second issue is about

    the threat of our resources. The forests

    we used to have are no more. Almost all

    the forest reserves have been encroached

    upon. In the past, one would hardly hear

    of someone encroaching a forest reserve.

    Encroachment was in the unreserved

    areas, but today, because all the trees in

    the unreserved areas have been felled,

    people have the courage to go into the

    forest reserves. Forest reserves are under

    attack now. That is, with regard to the

    productive and unproductive forest

    reserves.

    As soon as that one finishes, the next

    target would be the wildlife resources. If

    we begin to cut the trees in the wildlife

    reserves, we will not have any animals

    again because the animals live in the

    forest. So, I would like to advice the Hon

    Deputy Minister, and therefore, the Hon

    Minister, to take steps to ensure that our

    wildlife reserves remain protected for the

    sake of posterity.

    Mr Speaker, with these few comments

    -- [Interruption]. It is because I wanted to add more. With these few comments,

    I would urge my Hon Colleagues to

    support this very important Bill, and to

    get it passed. I thank you very much.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:36 p.m.
    Very
    well. Yes, Hon Member for Asokwa?
    Ms Patricia Appiagyei (NPP — Asokwa) 3:36 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to add my
    voice to the Bill on the Floor, that Hon
    Members should support the passing of
    this Bill because this Bill is long
    overdue. It has been twelve years along
    the line, and not much has been done
    about it. It is something that we need to
    critically examine as a House and ensure
    its passage because a number of
    international treaties have been passed,
    and the Bill has not taken cognisance of
    that.
    Mr Speaker, you would agree with me
    that conservation of our biodiversity is
    an important activity that must be done
    and done properly, especially in the face
    of the current climate change and its
    effects on our forest zones. It is,
    therefore, very critical that we look at the
    Bill and come up with the right policies
    to guide our activities in that area.

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    Mr Speaker, you would agree with me

    that quite recently, we had a case where

    an individual brought a tiger into the

    country, and by its roaring alone, it posed

    a danger. If we had the right way of

    ensuring that imports of such endangered

    animals are well taken care of, I think

    with the guidance of an appropriate Bill,

    we would be able to deal with this issue.

    We have a number of people rearing

    snakes and crocodiles in their homes, and

    it is also very important to ensure that

    other neighbours are not hurt by the way

    these animals are kept. It is critical that

    we have a guidance through the passage

    of this Bill to address this issue.

    Our endangered animals are the ones

    that we also have to ensure that we still

    keep in check and ensure that they stay

    with us. That is why we still have

    animals like elephants being in our

    communities because of the conservation

    laws that are passed to ensure that.

    Mr Speaker, it is my passionate appeal

    that Hon Members support this Bill.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Thank
    you very much. Hon Members, at the
    conclusion — All right. Let me hear the Hon Member for Manso Nkwanta
    briefly.
    Mr George Kwabena Obeng Takyi
    (NPP — Manso-Nkwanta): Mr Speaker, thank you for this opportunity
    to contribute to this Bill.
    Mr Speaker, my concern, in the first
    place, is that when you look into the
    Bible, when the world was created, men
    were fewer than animals because the
    garden of Eden was filled with a lot of
    animals with just one man. Today, we
    have more people than the animals in this
    country.
    It tells us that the maintenance of our
    environment that we are endued to
    ensure has been relegated to the
    background, so we are not taking care of
    these animals that were with us at the
    beginning of the earth, and today, we are
    living as human beings without our
    friends, the animals, which God created
    for us. This situation calls for immediate
    attention, and we have to dilate on this
    issue critically, and ensure that our
    environment which comprises of the
    forest, the people and the animals in it is
    looked at again.
    Mr Speaker, I would like to start from
    our own residence. We used to have very
    small towns surrounded by forests with a
    lot of animals moving around. Today, all
    our forests, both primary and secondary,
    have been depleted, and we are building
    only houses. Previously, when travelling
    from Accra to Kumasi, at Achimota, one
    would see flora all the way to Nsawam.
    Today, from Achimota to Nsawam, all
    one would see is buildings.
    Let us ask ourselves how many
    animals are there since there are a lot of
    people in there. We have to look at this
    critically. The way we are depleting our
    forests and lands means that very soon
    we would be living on this earth without
    our friends, the animals. Let us have
    these laws also controlling the way that
    we are building, and make sure that we
    reserve certain forests in between our
    residential areas and make sure that we

    Wildlife Resources Management Bill, 2022 — Second Reading

    have wildlife and rivers, and not build to

    destroy our forests and water bodies.

    Mr Speaker, at the same time, we are

    farming. Are we controlling our

    farming? We are burning the bushes and

    driving away the animals that live in the

    bush. How are we controlling these

    animals? In terms of farming, taking

    away the forest and the trees and driving

    away the animals, how are we going to

    save them? The ecological implication of

    this is that we are ignoring that, which

    needs our attention.

    Mr Speaker, we are talking about

    wildlife. When we visit some of these

    forests as my Hon Colleague was saying,

    most of these primary areas have also

    been depleted. I may want to suggest that

    we have in place declassification of some

    of these lands, make them be some forest

    reserve for us, so that today, we can take

    advantage of these destroyed lands

    where we can reclaim them, make sure

    we put the forest back there, and reserve

    them for these animals, and I believe that

    with time, we can reverse the trend

    where we have these reclaimed lands

    reforested, put the animals in there and

    preserve them for future use.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Thank
    you very much. Leadership, can I
    conclude? Very well.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Wildlife Resources Management Bill,
    2022 accordingly read a Second time.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 4:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    may we turn to page 10, item number 21
    on today's Order Paper. We have agreed to do a few clauses of the Ghana
    Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022,
    and then we would draw the curtain for
    the day. That is an agreement between
    Leadership. The Hon Member for South
    Dayi, Mr Rockson-Nelson E. K.
    Dafeamekpor should defer to his Whip
    and he should look in the direction of the
    Hon Minority Whip.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, I will invite you to the item
    listed 21 on page 10 — Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 at
    the Consideration Stage.
    BILLS — CONSIDERATION
    STAGE 4:46 p.m.

    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Chairman of the Committee, where is
    your Minister? All right, the Hon Deputy
    Minister is around. We will begin with
    clause 11.
    Clause 11 — Establishment of the Executive Committee.
    Mr Kwabena Amankwa Asiamah
    (Chairman of the Committee): Mr
    Speaker, I beg to move that clause 11,
    subclause (2), paragraph (d), delete and
    insert the following:
    (d) two other persons, one with
    legal expertise and the other
    with financial expertise, both

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage

    nominated by the Minister, at

    least, one of whom is a woman.
    Mr Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Very well. Hon
    Members, there is a proposed
    amendment to clause 11.
    Mr Rockson-Nelson E. K.
    Dafeamekpor: Mr Speaker, thank you
    for the opportunity. I am in support of the
    present amendment, safe to propose
    further amendment to line 1, after the
    word “with” to insert “relevant” to read:
    two other persons, one with relevant
    legal expertise and the other with
    financial expertise, both nominated
    by the Minister, at least, one of
    whom is a woman.
    Mr Speaker, the rational is that a
    person may have legal expertise as a
    result of long-standing at the Bar, but the
    expertise must be relevant to the purpose
    for which we want the person to serve on
    this Committee. I think that that will
    serve — Let me demonstrate. For instance, I am 14 years at the Bar, I am
    in my fourteenth year, and may speak of
    expertise, but I may not have relevant
    expertise in energy law. So, if we speak
    of legal expertise, we need to qualify it
    with the relevant area for which we want
    to nominate the person. With these
    words, I propose this further amendment
    to the amendment on the floor.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, are you saying you are
    proposing further amendment to the —
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:46 p.m.
    That is so, Mr
    Speaker. I support the amendment being
    carried, but I am proposing a further
    amendment in respect of —
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Then it
    means you do not support the
    amendment made.
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I do.
    I am not rejecting the amendment, but I
    am adding to the amendment. This is a
    new amendment. It is a new proposal.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, so what will be the rendition?
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:46 p.m.
    The new rendition
    would be read: “two other persons, one with relevant legal expertise…”
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Mr
    Chairman, there is a further proposed
    amendment.
    Mr K.A. Asiamah 4:46 p.m.
    Yes, Mr Speaker.
    It was discussed the other day that we
    should add “relevant” so that it will be more meaningful. I agree with the Hon
    Member.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    So, you
    are with the further —
    Mr K.A. Asiamah 4:46 p.m.
    Yes, Mr Speaker.
    I agree with the further amendment.
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    consequentially, the “expertise” qualifying the “financial” person should also be qualified with “relevant” as well.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Mr
    Chairman, did you hear that one too?

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage
    Mr K.A. Asiamah 4:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is
    consequential. So, if it is here, it should
    be there also. I agree with him.
    Question put and amendment agreed
    to.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, we would move to clause 11
    (4).
    Mr K.A. Asiamah 4:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg
    to move that clause 11 (4) add the
    following new subclause:
    The President shall, in accordance
    with article 70 of the Constitution,
    appoint the chairperson and other
    members of the Executive Committee.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Very
    well. Hon Members, there is a proposed
    amendment to clause 11 (4). Any
    contrary view?
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:46 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is a
    standard provision so it means in re-
    aligning the sub provisions, this will
    appear before subclause 4 as it is
    contained in the Bill itself. Is that the
    case?
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Yes,
    Hon Member.
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:46 p.m.
    All right, Mr
    Speaker.
    Question put and amendment agreed
    to.
    Clause 11 as amended ordered to stand
    part of the Bill.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:46 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, we would now move to clause
    12.
    Clause 12 ordered to stand part of the
    Bill.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, we will turn to clause 13.
    Mr Chairman, is there any proposed
    amendment?
    Mr K.A. Asiamah 3:56 p.m.
    No, Mr Speaker.
    We have done clauses 12, 13 and 14
    already. The Question has been put and
    we have done that already.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Very
    well. I just want to go through
    systematically.
    Clause 13 ordered to stand part of the
    Bill.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, we will now move to clause
    14.
    Clause 14 ordered to stand part of the
    Bill.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, now we would move to clause
    15. There is an advertised amendment by
    the Hon Member for Tamale South, Mr
    Haruna Iddrisu.
    Clause 15 — Secretariat of the Commission.

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage

    Mr Agbodza on behalf of Mr Haruna

    Iddrisu: Mr Speaker, I beg to move,

    clause 15, headnote, before

    “Secretariat”, add “Establishment of the”.

    Mr Speaker, we have made laws in this

    House and the rendition was

    “establishment of this” or “establishment of that”. So, I think the idea is to just make it more elegant — “Establishment of the Secretariat”, if the Hon Chairman would agree.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Very
    well. Hon Chairman, there is a proposed
    amendment by the Hon Member for
    Tamale South.
    Mr K. A. Asiamah 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    agree with the Hon Member.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Chairman, do you agree with the
    proposed amendment?
    Mr K. A. Asiamah 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, yes,
    I agree with the proposal.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Very
    well.
    Yes, Hon Member for South Dayi?
    Mr Dafeamekpor 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    agree. Indeed, it is in conformity with
    clause 11. The headnote of clause 11
    reads, “Establishment of the Executive Committee”, so it is in order that the headnote of clause 15 should mutatis
    mutandis appear so.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Very
    well.
    Question put and amendment agreed
    to
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, we will move on to clause 15,
    subclause 1.
    Mr Agbodza 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to
    move, clause 15, subclause (1), delete
    and insert the following: “(1) There is established by this Act, the Secretariat of
    the Commission”.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, there is a proposed
    amendment to clause 15, subclause 1 —
    Yes, Hon Chairman of the Committee.
    Mr K. A. Asiamah 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    agree with the proposal.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Very
    well. Yes, Hon Member for South Dayi?
    Mr Dafeamekpor 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    indeed, let me take you back to clause 11
    where we have a twin provision which
    begins, I beg to quote: “There is established by this Act” and so, it, indeed, conforms to internal consistency
    of the Bill.
    Question put and amendment agreed
    to
    Clause 15 as amended ordered to stand
    part of the Bill.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, we will turn to clause 16.

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage

    Clause 16 — Functions of the Secretariat
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Yes,
    Hon Chairman?
    Mr K. A. Asiamah 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg
    to move, clause 16, paragraph (k), line 1,
    delete “may” and insert “may, with the prior approval of the General
    Assembly,”.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Very
    well. Hon Members, there is a proposed
    amendment by the Hon Chairman of the
    Committee to clause 16.
    Yes, I will come to Mr Bedzrah.
    Mr Emmanuel Kwasi Bedzrah 3:56 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, thank you.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Chairman says
    we should delete “may” but the word “may” is repeated in phrase to be inserted. Why would the Hon Chairman
    not say that after “may” instead of delete “may” and bringing back the word “may” again—[Interruption]— Do not delete the “may”. Just go ahead and say insert after “may” —
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Yes,
    Hon Member for South Dayi?
    Mr Dafeamekpor 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the
    proposal for this amendment is in order,
    safe that the Hon Chairman has not
    justified why he is bringing the caveat
    that is, “with the prior approval of the General Assembly”. If the Hon Chairman could justify why he is
    introducing this into the legislation we
    would be grateful. The Hon Chairman
    has to justify it. [Interruption].
    Mr Speaker, no, the Hon Chairman
    seeks to qualify the word “may” with “prior approval”, there has to be a reason for that.
    Mr K. A. Asiamah 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the
    General Assembly must, prior to the
    Committee's approval of all what they say —[Interruption]— No, it should not be “shall”; it should be “may”. It should not be “shall”, it is not definite. It could be changed, so it is “may”.
    Mr Dafeamekpor 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the
    Hon Chairman has not convinced me.
    The Hon Member requested that the
    Chairman should convince us why he is
    adding “the prior approval of the General Assembly”. He has not convinced us. [Mr K. A. Asiamah: Hon Member, read
    the whole thing] We have read it. Just
    convince us why you are adding “may, by the prior approval of the General
    Assembly”, you have not convinced us. [Laughter] He should convince the
    House [Interruption][Laughter]
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Yes, I
    will come to the Hon Ranking Member
    of the Committee.
    Ranking Member of the Committee
    (Mr Peter Kwasi Nortsu-Kotoe): Mr
    Speaker, thank you.
    Mr Speaker, the Secretariat is
    answerable to the General Assembly. So,
    in any case, they have a lot of functions
    to perform but this one is outside their
    jurisdiction. That is, they are going to

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage

    enter into association. So, before they do

    that, they have to obtain permission. But

    it is not mandatory that they should

    always seek permission before they

    enter. Where it is outside their

    jurisdiction, that is where they would

    have to seek approval from the General

    Assembly.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Ranking Member, so, is that why you
    used the word “may”? Very well.
    Mr Dafeamekpor 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    additionally, these are standard
    provisions. I was hoping that the Hon
    Chairman would tell us that they do not
    want the Secretariat to be on a frolic of
    their own in making these —
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, you are a lawyer. That is your
    daily practice, so —
    Mr Dafeamekpor 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, yes. I
    am only saying that he is the Hon
    Chairman of the Committee and these
    are how one should justify their
    provisions on the Floor before they are
    carried. So, I am only encouraging him
    to learn to defend his amendments. That
    is all.
    Mr Obeng Takyi — rose —
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, he should always consult you,
    right?
    Very well.
    Question put and amendment agreed
    to
    Mr George Kwabena Obeng Takyi 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I was up on my feet but I
    could not catch your eye.
    I have a problem with the word “may”
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, which ‘may'?
    Mr Obeng Takyi 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, yes, in
    the amendment that we are doing, I have
    a problem with the word “may”. I do not know if I could make —
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, let us hear you.
    Mr Obeng Takyi 3:56 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, there
    is an issue that the last speaker was
    commenting on that if we need to have
    the General Assembly to have prior
    approval and use the word “may”, it is not compulsory, so, they could still
    override it. Hence, I believe the word
    should be “shall” so that there is some compulsion. They would have to seek
    the approval of the General Assembly
    before they could start anything but if it
    is “may”, it means that at any point in time, if they do not want to get the
    approval of the General Assembly, it
    stands. That is my concern.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 3:56 p.m.
    Well,
    Hon Members, that is his view but Hon
    Member, in legal structures we do not
    use the word “shall” if the person would have a leeway to — so, we normally use “shall” if you do not want anybody to have any other way. So, I think the Hon
    Chairman is forthright.

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage

    Clause 16 as amended ordered to stand

    part of the Bill.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, clause 14 — The Clerks-at- the-Table have drawn my attention to the
    fact that clause 14 was dealt with the
    other time we considered the
    amendment. I have just been shown the
    Votes and Proceedings which actually
    indicated that clause 14 has already been
    amended. So, we are revisiting it, and going back to what has already been
    amended. Hon Members, am I okay with
    it?
    Clause 14 as amended ordered to stand
    part of the Bill.
    Hon Members, we will turn to clause 17.
    Clause 17 ordered to stand part of the
    Bill.
    Clause 18 — Functions of the Secretary- General.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Chairman?
    Mr K. A. Asiamah 4:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to
    move, clause 18, subclause (1), add the
    following new paragraph: “(d) the performance of any other function assigned
    by the General Assembly.”
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:06 p.m.
    Hon Chairman, with
    all due respect, we are helping you to do
    this. We are not your opponents —
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Member for South Dayi, let us hear you.
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I agree
    with the proposed amendment. However,
    the Hon Chairman should indicate that there
    are about four other sub functions that have
    been stated, so if he is proposing that it
    should be inserted as subclause (d), what
    happens to the existing subclause (d) in
    terms of alignment. The functions are stated
    sequentially, so we need to know.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Yes, Hon
    Ranking Member?
    Mr Nortsu-Kotoe 4:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the
    amendment proposed in the Committee
    Report has no subclause (d) as indicated in
    the Order Paper. It says, “add a new sub clause”, so the “(d)” there is an error.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    So, it
    means “(d)” will be an additional subclause.
    Mr Nortsu-Kotoe 4:06 p.m.
    Yes, so it would be
    “(e)”.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Is it an
    additional subclause?
    Mr Nortsu-Kotoe 4:06 p.m.
    Yes, it would be an
    additional subclause.
    So, it would be subclause (e) instead of
    (d).
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Hon

    It appears the Hon Chairman is confused.
    Mr K.A. Asiamah 4:06 p.m.
    Yes, Mr Speaker, but
    normally we do not even do these
    arrangements on the floor of the House.
    After we finish, it is the draftspersons who
    arrange it.

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    No, Hon
    Chairman. Once we are effecting a new
    subclause, the House needs to know, and it
    must be effected here. It is not something
    that can be left to the draftspersons.
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you. Especially because this is the omnibus and normally, the omnibus appears last, and it is clashing with an existing subclause (d), so I just wanted clarification.
    Hon Chairman, I am your Friend.
    Question put and amendment agreed to.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    We will now move to the subclause (d) —We have to deal with subclause (d) before we deal with the entire — Is it not part of Clause 18?
    Mr Agbodza 4:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, all that we have done so far, as the Hon Member for South Dayi said, is an omnibus clause, so we can make it the last one.
    Indeed, it might not be subclause (d), so the draftspersons could just rearrange it appropriately, so we do not need to split hairs over it.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Very well. Then let me put the Question on the entire Clause 18.
    Clause 18 as amended ordered to stand part of the Bill.
    Clause 19 — Appointment of Deputy Secretaries-General
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Hon Chairman?
    Mr K. A. Asiamah 4:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, subclause (1), line 2, delete “Commission” and insert “Commission,
    one in charge of Programmes and the other in charge of General Operations”.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Very well.
    Is there any contrary view?
    Yes, Hon Member for South Dayi?
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    debated this matter at the Committee level,
    and I was defeated, but I promised them that
    I would bring it to the Floor. The
    consistency of drafting when it comes to
    creating statutory deputy portfolios is
    Finance and Administration, and
    Operations. Normally, that is what we do,
    but I raised the issue that if they say
    Programmes, it comes under Operations, so,
    I had a difficulty but they did not find favour
    with my reasoning, so I thought that I
    should raise it for the attention of other Hon
    Members who may have some knowledge
    in this matter.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Chairman, can you expatiate on
    “Commissioner in charge of Programmes and Commissioner in charge of General
    Operation”. What is the difference?
    Hon Chairman or Ranking Member of
    the Committee? Whoever is capable of
    responding to it.
    Mr Nortsu-Kotoe 4:06 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the
    United Nations educational, Scientific and
    Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is under
    the Ministry of Education, and they have a
    structure that takes care of their finances, so
    theirs is Operations and General Activities.
    Anything financial is treated by the Finance
    Department of the Ministry of Education.
    So, they only prepare their request to the
    Finance section of the Ministry of
    Education. Looking at their Programmes

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage

    and General Operations, some are in charge

    of field work, and the others in charge of

    office work, so they do not need Finance

    and Administration. This is what the

    UNESCO structure operates. That is why

    we decided that it should remain as it is,

    because we are following the international

    structure.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Very well.
    Yes, Hon Member?
    Mr Emmanuel Kwasi Bedzrah 4:06 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, we are making a law for this
    country. We are not making a law for an
    international organisation like UNESCO.
    This law is for Ghana; therefore, we must
    follow our best practices in this country.
    Even if the Finance Department is managed
    by the Ministry of Education, we can have
    General Administration. Operations comes
    under General Administration. Why do we
    have a commissioner in charge of
    operations and another commissioner in
    charge of programmes? It does not sound
    well at all.
    Mr Speaker, to me, it is neither here nor
    there. Let us have a commissioner in charge
    of administration if we do not want finance
    to be named, then operations would come
    under administration.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:06 p.m.
    Hon
    Chairman?
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, before
    the Hon Chairman comes in, I refer the
    House to clause 38 of the Bill. The headnote
    is Funds of the Secretariat of the
    Commission. It reads:
    The funds of the Secretariat of the
    Commission are
    (a) Moneys approved by Parliament;
    (b) Donations and loans; and
    (c) Moneys realised from fundraising activities of the
    Commission.
    Mr Speaker, these are also standard
    provisions. We are setting up, by
    statutory enactment, a Commission of
    this nature. By statute, we are saying that
    there will be sources of funding
    approved by this House, and are we
    saying that we will not have a deputy
    who will be in charge of finance and
    administration? — No, we may be couching this within the general
    UNESCO organogram, but I think that
    internally — that is the point I am making — we should have a deputy Secretary-General who should be in
    charge of finance and administration.
    That is the gravamen of my point, but
    we are creating these offices statutorily
    and heightening it to operations and
    general duties. I have a big problem with
    the fact that we are leaving finance and
    administration out completely. If the
    Hon Ranking Member thinks that
    general administration will serve the
    purpose, I am all for it, but I do not think
    that finance and administration should be
    left out in terms of the hierarchy as to the
    deputyship.
    Mr Buah — rose —

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:16 p.m.
    Yes,
    Hon Deputy Minority Leader?
    Mr Emmanuel Armah-Kofi Buah 4:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the points that are raised are very important, but it looks like it is a very serious policy matter that must be left for the Hon Minister to really address. So, I would suggest that we hold on to this matter and allow the Hon Minister to clarify it.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:16 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, but we have the Hon Deputy Minister here.
    Mr K. A. Asiamah 4:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    when my Hon Colleague raised this at the Committee level, it was explained to him that this is a terminology of UNESCO; it is an international body. They have their jargons, and they have a culture. We cannot be off the culture of
    UNESCO. Operations and programmes are explicit here: one in charge of programmes and one in charge of general operations. General operations may include finance. So, what is the Hon Member's problem here? Why should we be off what is the norm internationally? Why can we not have finance and administration because we say general operations? So, this must be maintained.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:16 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, irrespective of the fact that we are doing a UNESCO Bill, we are doing it in Ghana's Parliament. So, what I will do is that I will put the question. If there is somebody who would like to also propose a further amendment, he or she can do that then we will vote on it. That will be the decision of the House.
    Mr Agbodza 4:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I can
    understand the point being made by my
    Hon Colleagues, but the sponsors of the
    Bill are saying that they want this in a
    particular way because this is the
    UNESCO standard. Other people are
    saying they would like to change it. If
    what the Hon Deputy Minister and the
    Hon Chairman of the Committee are
    saying is true, what is the point of us
    saying that the people who want a change
    are more than others and so we should
    change it?
    Mr Speaker, I plead that we defer this
    issue and get the Hon Chairman of the
    Committee and the Hon Deputy Minister
    to consult further with the Hon Minister
    and UNESCO so that they can give us a
    confirmed — [Inaudible] — those against it are more than those for it so we
    should vote and do anything we like?
    That would be a wrong thing to do. There
    are so many other clauses, so we can
    freeze this one and come back later.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:16 p.m.
    Very
    well. So, do we defer it?
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    would like to justify my position again. I
    would like to refer the House to the
    Memorandum — [Interruption] — Yes, I have justified — Please, everybody should appreciate my position. I have
    justified my proposed amendment.
    Mr Speaker, with your leave, I would
    like to refer you to clause 19 of the
    Memorandum, which sought to explain
    the provision in question. It:

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage

    …provides for the appointment of two Deputy Secretaries-General for

    the Commission by the President in

    accordance with article 195 of the

    Constitution and on the terms and

    conditions specified in the letter of

    appointment.

    Mr Speaker, where does the UNESCO

    term of art come in here? I am only

    saying that is the standard drafting style

    of the House, and I asked the Hon

    Chairman at the Committee level. They

    have not defined this UNESCO term of

    art; it is not in the interpretation section.

    I will make my point forcefully for the

    records, and I think I am right, but I will

    disengage.

    Ms Alhassan and Mr Nortsu-Kotoe

    — rose —
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:16 p.m.
    Yes,
    Hon First Deputy Majority Whip?
    Ms Lydia Seyram Alhassan 4:16 p.m.
    Mr
    Speaker, I thought that the agreement
    here was that we should defer that
    particular clause. So, I do not know why
    my dear Hon Colleague is still dragging
    this. We should move on. There are so
    many others to do.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:16 p.m.
    So, is it
    the agreement of the House that we defer
    that particular clause? [Pause] Have you
    disengaged? You have abandoned your
    position? So we should move on?
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:16 p.m.
    Yes, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:16 p.m.
    Very
    well.
    Mr Bedzrah 4:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we are
    making a law for this country. We are not
    making a law for UNESCO. We must go
    by the standard practice in this country.
    Is there any institution where we have a
    deputy managing director or deputy
    commissioner in charge of operations?
    We do not have it. So, we are saying that
    instead of having general operations and
    others, let us have finance and
    administration because the Hon Member
    of Parliament for South Dayi just read
    from the Memorandum that moneys
    would be approved from this House.
    Who is going to take care of that money?
    — [Interruption]— Operations?
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Chairman of the
    Committee is confusing us. Let us defer
    this issue. They should go and do their
    homework and come back.
    Mr Nortsu-Kotoe — rose —
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:16 p.m.
    Yes,
    Hon Ranking Member of the
    Committee?
    Mr Nortsu-Kotoe 4:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I
    would like to draw your attention to a
    proposed amendment on page 12 of the
    Order Paper. There, we have the
    functions of the Deputy Secretary-
    General.
    If we consider the proposed
    amendment at clause 20(1), which is the
    new clause which would replace clause
    20, we would see that the deputy in
    charge of general programmes would
    take care of the activities. Then when we
    come to clause 20(2), the deputy there
    would take care of finance,

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage

    administration, monitoring and

    evaluation, public relations, and

    procurement. So, what they will do is

    defined there.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:16 p.m.
    Very
    well.
    Hon Members, this is a tailored
    programme, and like the Hon Member
    for Adaklu said, that is their focus. Their
    focus is programmes, so let us go by the
    proposed amendment by the Hon
    Chairman of the Committee.
    Question put and amendment agreed
    to.
    Clause 19 as amended ordered to stand
    part of the Bill.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:16 p.m.
    Hon
    Majority Chief Whip, shall we move on?
    Very well.
    Clause 20 — Functions of Deputy Secretary-General
    Mr K. A. Asiamah 4:16 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg
    to move, delete and insert the following:
    “Functions of Deputy Secretary- General
    20. (1) The Deputy Secretary-
    General in charge of
    Programmes
    (a) shall advise the Secretary-
    General on the execution
    of the general programmes
    of the Secretariat of the
    Commission;
    (b) shall coordinate the
    preparation of reports and
    country position papers
    for conferences and other
    inter-governmental
    meetings of UNESCO;
    (c) is responsible for the
    development of the
    programme implementation
    plan of the Secretariat of
    the Commission;
    (d) shall have oversight responsibility over programmes
    in the areas of competence of
    UNESCO;
    (e) shall perform any other
    function that may be
    assigned by the Secretary-
    General.
    (2) The Deputy Secretary-General in
    charge of General Operations shall
    (a) assist the Secretary-General
    to direct the operations of the
    Secretariat of the
    Commission to achieve the
    goals of the Secretariat of the
    Commission;
    (b) ensure the effective
    implementation of the
    operational policies and
    plans of the Secretariat of the
    Commission;
    (c) have oversight responsibility
    over specific internal operational
    areas, including Finance,
    Administration, Monitoring and

    Ghana Commission for UNESCO Bill, 2022 — Consideration Stage

    Evaluation, Public Relations

    and Procurement;

    (d) advise the Secretary-General

    on the financial and

    administrative matters of

    UNESCO;

    (e) perform any other function

    that may be assigned by the

    Secretary-General.

    (3) In the absence of the Secretary-

    General, the Deputy Secretary-

    General who is more senior shall

    act as Secretary-General.

    (4) A Deputy Secretary-General is

    answerable to the Secretary-

    General in the performance of

    functions under this Act.”
    Mr Dafeamekpor 4:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, if
    we take clause 20(3), it reads — if I get it right—
    “(3) In the absence of the Secretary- General, the Deputy Secretary-
    General who is more senior shall
    act as Secretary-General.”
    Mr Speaker, my difficulty is that we
    have not explained what “more senior” means in the interpretation, so is it by
    appointment as to date? I would like to
    know because it is a new office and we
    are appointing a Secretary-General and
    the two deputies contemporaneously, so
    we must be careful how we couch this.
    We are not dealing with an existing
    entity — [Interruption] — you see, we used “more senior” — it is the duties. This may be a subject of litigation in the
    future. For instance, if I am the Deputy
    Secretary-General for Operations and
    there is the Deputy Secretary-General for
    Programmes and we are all appointed the
    same day, when the Secretary-General is
    not around, the law says that the “most senior” would act. Between the two of us as Deputy Secretaries-General —
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:26 p.m.
    Hon
    Chairman, could you clarify the
    positions? Is the seniority in terms of
    appointment or it could even be by
    position itself?
    Mr K. A. Asiamah 4:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is
    not by date of birth but by appointment,
    and it is not exclusive to this Bill only; it
    is in all other Bills. In the establishments,
    they know who is the most senior. It has
    to do with who was first given his or her
    appointment before the other. It is
    construed, so they know who is senior to
    the other. We do not have to bring that
    into the law. In other laws, it is there, and
    the Hon Member knows — [Interruption] — So, why did the Hon Member raise it?
    Question put and amendment agreed
    to.
    Clause 20 as amended ordered to stand
    part of the Bill.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:26 p.m.
    Yes,
    Hon First Deputy Majority Whip, are we
    ending here?
    Ms Alhassan 4:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, yes, that is
    about all for the day. A lot has been done
    today.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:26 p.m.
    Hon
    Member, so what is the indication now?
    Ms Alhassan 4:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we are in
    your hands for the rest of your decision.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:26 p.m.
    Very
    well.
    Hon Members, we will bring the
    Consideration Stage to a temporary
    close.
    Leadership, may I get any indication?
    Ms Alhassan 4:26 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, that is
    about all for the day. We are in your
    hands.
    Mr Second Deputy Speaker 4:26 p.m.
    Hon
    Members, the time is 4.30 p.m. I will,
    therefore, proceed to adjourn the House
    to tomorrow, Wednesday, 5th July, 2023
    at 10.00 a.m.
    ADJOURNMENT 4:26 p.m.