Debates of 19 Jul 2006

MR. SPEAKER
PRAYERS 10 a.m.

CORRECTION OF VOTES 10 a.m.

AND PROCEEDINGS AND 10 a.m.

THE OFFICIAL REPORT 10 a.m.

Mr. Speaker 10 a.m.
Order! Order! Correction of Votes and Proceedings, Tuesday, 18th July, 2006. Page 1. . . .8 --
Mr. F. K. Owusu-Adjapong 10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to crave your indulgence to amend your referral of the Loan Agreement indicated on page 8(b) to only the Finance Committee to include the Committee on Food and Agriculture since the Loan Agreement would be dealing with financing the promotion of perennial crops in Ghana.
Mr. Speaker 10 a.m.
Majority Leader, I so vary this order and include the Committee on Food and Agriculture. Page 9, 10, . .
.16 --
Mr. Kwadwo Adjei-Darko 10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker with reference to “Committee on Education -- In attendance,” there were two people from the Attorney-General's Department and I suppose one of them was Mr. Paul Owusu Appiah. So the Clerk's Office should check the records well. Mr. Appiah is not from the West African Examinations Council; he is from the Attorney-General's Department.
Mr. Speaker 10 a.m.
Thank you for the information. Pages 17. . .18. Hon. Members, we have two Official Reports, for Tuesday 11th July, 2006 and Wednesday, 12th July, 2006. Item 3 -- Urgent Questions. Is the hon. Minister for Finance and Economic Planning in the House?
Minister for Parliamentary Affairs/ Majority Leader (Mr. F. K. Owusu- Adjapong) 10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I wish to plead that you allow the hon. Deputy Minister for Finance and Economic Planning who is also the hon. Member for Wenchi to answer the Questions on behalf of the hon. Minister. The hon. Minister is unavoidably absent but I hope he would join us somewhere along the line.
Mr. Speaker 10 a.m.
Deputy Minister for Finance and Economic Planning? Hon. Mahama Ayariga, hon. Member for Parliament for Bawku Central, you may ask your Question.
Mr. Mahama Ayariga 10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, it appears that apart from reading the Budget, the hon. Minister does not seem to take interest in other matters relating to this House.
Mr. Speaker 10 a.m.
Hon. Member, we know what is happening behind the scenes. He would come but later.
URGENT QUESTIONS 10 a.m.

MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 10 a.m.

ECONOMIC PLANNING 10 a.m.

Mr. Ayariga 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to find out from the hon. Minister as of June 2006, how much of the debt was left unpaid.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I said that as of 31st May, out of the total debt of ¢4.3 trillion, one which was converted into bonds, ¢1.34 trillion had been retired, that is, had been paid. So what is left is ¢2.9 trillion.
Mr. Ayariga 10:10 a.m.
How much accumulated
to the fund?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
again I stated at the beginning that what has accrued to the fund is ¢3,582,407,051,142.
Mr. Ayariga 10:10 a.m.
If the total accumulation
is ¢3.5 trillion, how come that in terms of payment, they have paid for only ¢1.3 trillion. What happens to the difference?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
it is very, very clear -- very simple. All these moneys were converted into bonds so the payments were actually payments from whoever bought the bonds to actually retire those moneys. Whenever the bonds mature that is where you pay the part of the principal and that retires the debt stock. So the debt stock would be reduced by that amount but then, we should remember that as you do that then the interest is also building on it.
Mr. Ayariga 10:10 a.m.
By what the hon. Deputy Minister has told us, it means that they would only pay when the bond matures. If they have the money lying there, why do they have to wait till the bond matures. The bond attracts interests so ultimately, you will be paying the principal plus interest when you could have just been paying the actual amount without the interests.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
the money is not sitting there. The money accumulates as we get the levies collected. So it is not that the money is sitting there and we are not using it to pay. We pay as and when it comes in. But remember the total debt, as I said, was about ¢4 trillion and what we have collected is less than the debt so it was not the case that the money was sitting there and we are not using it to pay.
Mr. C. K. Humado 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
I would like to ask the hon. Minister whether from the historical account that he has given on the debt stock and the indications so far, the policy of reducing the debt stock as a result of price increases and the deregulation is being achieved.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I do not think I understood the question properly.
Mr. Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Hon. Member, would you be kind to repeat the question.
Mr. Humado 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am
saying that the objectives of price increases preceding the deregulation and the deregulation itself, I believe, is to reduce the persistent debt stock of Tema Oil Refinery (TOR). So from all the measures they have put in place so far, are there any indications that the objective of this policy is being achieved?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the answer is yes; we think that the objective is being met.
Mr. Kofi Frimpong 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, may I know from the hon. Minister what brought about this debt at Tema Oil Refinery (TOR). Could he explain to us why we have this debt at TOR?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, this debt was incurred under the previous administration and we inherited most of it. It was as a result of under-recovery of the cost of production of oil in the country at that time and therefore the inability of the Tema Oil Refinery to really repay its cost. As a result, they had to borrow from commercial banks to support the amounts that they could not recover. In fact, we realized that it was unsustainable and if it had continued further, the Tema Oil Refinery would have collapsed and most importantly, the commercial banks would have collapsed. That was the reason why the Government assumed those debts and then converted them into bonds. So it was as a result of the practices of the past
Mr. Sallas-Mensah 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, in 2001, we were made to understand that there was a TOR debt. As a result of that all Ghanaians were made to pay for this debt by putting a levy on petroleum products. And one specific item was TOR Recovery Debt. So why is it that up till now, those levies that we have been paying to recover the TOR debt, has gone up to ¢4.3 trillion despite all these monies that are being paid by us?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the debt stock does not stay where it is; there are interests that are accruing on the stock no matter what you do with it. When you sell the bonds, you have to pay interest on the bonds. So it is the interest that has accumulated on this debt that have accounted for some of those increases that we are referring to. It is the stock plus the interest that have been accruing on that stock.
Mr. Sallas-Mensah 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the hon. Minister is trying to mislead this House -- [Interruption.]
Mr. Speaker 10:20 a.m.
Order! Order! Hon. Member for Upper West Akim, please ask your question.
Mr. Sallas-Mensah 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, a specific escrow account was opened at the Bank of Ghana into which these levies must be put and used to pay TOR debts. Why did they have to resort to bonds which would accrue interests to be paid by us again? Why did they resort to bond issue?
Mr. Speaker 10:20 a.m.
Hon. Members, please, let us have decorum; Deputy Minister?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, yes, an escrow account is created for the monies to be put in there. The commercial
banks at that time needed their money; so it was not putting your money into that account that should solve the problem. The solution to the problem was to pay the debt that was owed to the banks and that was why bonds were issued for monies to be purchased from the bond owners to pay for the debt. That was why we used the bonds. Government could not have had any money from anywhere else without maybe making a hole in the Consolidated Fund. So it was the private people who actually bought the bonds and that money was used to clear the debts in the commercial banks.
2004/2005 Bonus to Cocoa Farmers
Mr. Sampson Ahi asked the Minister for Finance and Economic Planning when cocoa bonus for the 2004/2005 season would be paid to cocoa farmers in the country.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, bonus payments are made to cocoa farmers when at the end of the season, better than expected revenue due to increased F.O.B. prices are realized.
At the beginning of every cocoa season, the Producer Price Review Committee (PPRC) made up of stakeholders in the indus t ry inc lud ing fa rmers ' representatives, the LBCs, COCOBOD, and other stakeholders meet to agree on the producer price to be paid to the farmers and other fees/rates for the other stakeholders during the season.
Mr. Speaker, these rates are agreed upon on the basis of certain parameters, the major ones being the Forecast Average F. O. B. price, Forecast Output to be realized, during the season and the Average Exchange Rate.
At the end of the season, if these forecast estimates result in increased
earnings than expected, it is only then that bonuses to farmers are paid.
Mr. Speaker, in the 2004/2005 season, the budgeted volume was 700,000 tonnes. This was not achieved and only 585,974.57 tonnes was attained, while the achieved average F.O.B. price of US$1,440/ton was as had been projected at the start of the season.
Mr. Speaker, in view of the reduction in the purchases figures and the F.O.B. price achieved as indicated above, COCOBOD was unable to pay bonus to farmers for the 2004/2005 crop season.
Mr. Speaker, it may interest this august House to note that since 2001, the following bonus payments have been made.
Bonuses Payment to Cocoa Farmers
(2001-2004)
Period Amout (¢)
March 2001 70.1 billion
October 2002 1.5 billion
February 2003 77.8 billion
October 2003 78.6 billion
October 2004 160.0 billion
Thank you very much Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Ahi 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, may I know from the hon. Minister what plans his Ministry has to communicate to farmers that because COCOBOD did not meet their target, the 2004/2005 bonus would not be paid.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the committee that actually decides on the prices and of course on whether bonuses would be paid, that is, the Producer Price Review Committee consists of all stakeholders including
farmers' representative. But to the extent that maybe farmers are still not aware of, I think the hon. Member's suggestion would be well taken, that maybe we will have to inform the entire cocoa producing areas that for 2004/2005 there will be no bonuses.
Mr. Ahi 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, according to the International Cocoa and Coffee Organisation (ICCO) report, in 2004 when cocoa bonus was paid, by December price per tonne was $1,070. By December 2005 price per tonne was $1,060. May I know from the hon. Minister why bonuses were not paid to the farmers with respect to the figures I have given to him.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, what I said was that the bonuses are determined based on the average prices throughout the period. To pick a price at one point over the period does not answer the question. The question is, what is the average price throughout the period and the average price was, maybe, the two prices that he has quoted divided by two if you have only two. But if there were so many of them -- And every month, there are fluctuations in the market all the time and it is the average that is used and not one particular price at a particular point in time.
Mr. Stephen M. E. K. Ackah 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to find out from the hon. Minister what caused the sharp downfall of the production of cocoa between 2004 and 2005 from 700 to 500 tonnes?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think, maybe, this question is not directly related to the Question at hand but there is a cycle, a cyclical movement in production. And you go up to the top and the downward trend and I think it is one of those cycles that are creating that. But

I can assure him that this year's figures are also climbing so up that they are also very close to the 700 that we had the last time around.
Mr. Alfred K. Agbesi 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to know from the hon. Minister whether farmers or farmer's represen- tatives are invited to that Committee or that body that sits to determine the payment of bonus.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
I said that the Producer Price Review Committee is made up of stakeholders in the industry including farmers' represen- tatives, the Local Buying Companies (LBCs), COCOBOD and other stake- holders. Yes, the farmer's representatives are on that board.
Mr. Speaker 10:30 a.m.
Hon. Member for North
Tongu, this has nothing to do with cocoa bonus. If you have another question, please go ahead and ask it.
Mr. Hodogbey 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, my question is, cocoa production has been down to only 700 tons and is now 500, according to his statement. What are the factors which led to this?
Mr. Speaker 10:30 a.m.
Hon. Member for North Tongu, this is not a supplementary Question.
Mr. B. D. K. Adu 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
the Purchasing Clerks at the end of the
payment delay paying the farmers. What action is the Ministry taking to avert this?
Mr. Speaker 10:30 a.m.
Which grant are you
referring to?
Mr. Adu 10:30 a.m.
I beg your pardon?
Mr. Speaker 10:30 a.m.
Ask your question again
please.
Mr. Adu 10:30 a.m.
The Purchasing Clerks, delay
in paying the farmers at the end. What action is the Ministry taking to accelerate quick payment by these purchasing clerks? Though they will obtain the money from them, they hoard the money, they do not pay the farmers promptly and it is creating a lot of problems at the end of the payment.
Mr. Speaker 10:30 a.m.
Hon. Member for
Okere, this cannot be a supplementary Question.
We move on to Item 4 -- Questions.
Question No. 504, hon. Abdul-Rashid Pelpuo, Member of Parliament for Wa Central.
Mr. Edward K. Salia 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
the hon. Member is unavoidably absent --
Mr. Speaker 10:30 a.m.
Please go ahead and ask
the Question.
ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS 10:30 a.m.

MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND 10:30 a.m.

ECONOMIC PLANNING 10:30 a.m.

Mr. Salia 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to ask
the hon. Minister whether in the event of there being shortages in revenue inflows, there could be a prioritization, of which of the items will take precedence over which other items.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:30 a.m.
Yes, Mr.
Speaker, the hon. Member is right. When the flows are not coming in as expected, we do prioritization. First, we do prioritization by the Ministries, that is the sectors and then within sectors, we also do prioritization. That is why I am trying to say that there is a slow process in releasing some of the funds.
Mr. Salia 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, with respect
to investment, since we are all aware that investment expenditure is normally spread over a longer term period, will it be possible for the Ministry to allow full implementation of investment programmes of various MDAs?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
when it comes to prioritization across the structure of the Budget, our first priority is Item 1, that is workers salaries. So that one is virtually circumscribed and that one has to take off first. If after that there is money, then of course Item 2 which also is related to people's salaries, so that one also will come off first, so if you talk of any prioritization, yes you are right. Certain projects which are very critical become our top priority, and so the prioritization can be done across the sectors and then across the structure of the Budget.
Mr. E. T. Mensah 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would want to find out from the hon. Deputy Minister whether he would do the prioritization in consultation with the Ministries concerned?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the
prioritization across the structure, as I said, since it is very critical to pay our workers, so we do not consult anybody. That one, we do it without consultation. But within the programmes, there is a Government development agenda. That agenda has been prioritized and that prioritization was actually done even before we drew the budget. That is what we use as the basis for the prioritization. And that I know involves the entire sector Ministries which have projects in that programme.
Mr. E. T. Mensah 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
experience has shown that when it comes to prioritizing at the level of projects, without the consent of the Ministries, the figures are reduced to the extent that none of the projects approved can be followed through. That was why I asked the question whether today, they do the prioritization, when it comes to projects, with the Ministries.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am not very sure about what the hon. Member is saying but I think what happened was that, this prioritization has already been done even before the budget was drawn. So we do not necessarily have to go back to the Ministries. But there are no situations that Ministries' projects are abandoned in the middle of the stream. All it creates is that, if we are unable to pay for it this year, it rolls over for the next year and so there is nothing like abandoning the projects, if that is what the hon. Member is alluding to.
ECONOMIC SITUATION 10:40 a.m.

Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the producer price that the farmer is paid is determined as a share of the net FOB price obtained for cocoa sales.
Goverrnment has committee itself to paying a minimum 70 per cent of the net FOB to the cocoa farmers as their share.
For the past two seasons, the producer price has been maintained at 9 million per tonne which in that case exceeds 70 per cent of the FOB price because of the decline in FOB price over the period.
Mr. Speaker, analysis available shows that, for the last years, farmers have benefited more than any other party involved in the share of the net FOB as depicted in the table below:
Description 2002/2003
2003/2004 2004/2005
2005/2006
In ¢'million in ¢'million in ¢'million in ¢' million
Producer 9.00
9.00 9.00 9.00
and diseases and pest control programmes are also deducted.
Mr. Opoku 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to know from the hon. Deputy Minister - from the Answer he has just given, what is the basis for saying that the cocoa spraying and scholarship for wards of farmers are free services to cocoa farmers? This is because, in his own Answer, deductions are made from the FOB -- [Hear! Hear!]
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the producer price is nine million cedis. That is what is entitled to the farmer. Anything beyond it is additional and that is why I refer to that as free.
Mr. Opoku 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, is the hon. Deputy Minister aware of the report of the 27th Meeting of the Producer Price Review Committee in which it is indicated that an amount of three hundred and ninety-seven billion cedis was deducted from the FOB price before they arrived at the net? Is he aware?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, as I have said already, the cost involved in the disease and pest control, the cost involved in buying jute sacks, and the cost involved in farmer services including scholarships are deducted from the gross FOB to arrive at the net FOB. It may well be that the figure that they were quoting is part of those amounts that are deducted. I am not aware of this specific figure. But of course, something has to be deducted from something to get the net and that is what he is you are actually alluding to. So I have not seen that specific figure but I know that the gross FOB, something has to be deducted and that is the cost involved in industry, in jute sacks, in disease and pest control and scholar-ships.
Alhaji Collins Dauda 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, would the hon. Deputy Minister for Finance and Economic Planning not agree
that the Answer he provided in terms of cocoa spraying, scholarships for wards of cocoa farmers and others that he alluded to as are free services is a wrong position, in view of his own Answer and the evidence provided by the hon. Member for Asunafo South?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I insist that it is not wrong. What I am saying is that the farmer sells this cocoa and is paid nine million cedis per tonne. That is what belongs to him. Anything beyond that is additional and to the extent that it is additional, that is why I refer to that as free.
Mr. Herod Cobbina 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to ask the hon. Deputy Minister for Finance and Economic Planning what criteria he is using to assert that cocoa farmers benefit equally from the hi-tech mass spraying and other programmes of the COCOBOD to supplement the effort of the cocoa farmers. What criteria or method is he using to assert that farmers are benefiting equally from the hi-tech cocoa mass spraying programmes?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
mass spraying means spraying for all and to the extent that it is for all, then the equity issue is rightly answered in there.
Mr. Paul Evans Aidoo 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
Mr. Speaker 10:50 a.m.
Hon. Member, if you
Mr. Paul Evans Aidoo 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
Price/ton
F.O.B. per ton ¢14,850,000 ¢14,850,000 ¢12,960,000 ¢13,050,000
Farmers' Share 68.11 69.00 73.02
72.66
Other Parties 31.89 31.00 26.98 27.34 Share
Mr. Speaker, it is important to stress that, apart from the ¢9,000,000.00/tonne paid as producer price, farmers also enjoy free services in the form of cocoa spraying, scholarship to wards of farmers who qualify. Presently, the Hi-Tech programme application of fertilizer and other hybrids is also ongoing to ensure that yield per acre increases for each farmer.
Mr. Speaker, before the application of this Hi-Tech, the yields was about 1.5 bags per acre or 250kg/hectare. After the first year of this Hi-Tech programme, yields increased to 9.2 bags per acre or 1,124 kg/hectare.
This improvement in yield has increased the income of the farmer per hectare even though the producer price has not been increased, thus the farmer has more money now per hectare.
In future, COCOBOD, in conjunction with Government will continue to provide improved services to farmers to further increase their yield in order to enhance their economic situation.
Mr. Opoku 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to know from the hon. Deputy Minister what deductions are made from the gross FOB to arrive at the net FOB?
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, before the FOB net is arrived at, industry costs are deducted, farmer services including scholarships are also deducted,
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:50 a.m.


I would like the hon. Deputy Minister for Finance and Economic Planning to explain to this House what an acre of cocoa farm is and the number of trees on each acre, since his assertion that an acre of cocoa farm yields 1.5 bags of cocoa per season is misleading. I want him to explain to this House.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
Mr. Speaker 10:50 a.m.
Order! Order!
Mr. Gyan-Baffour 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, but
then what I was referring to here --
rose
Mr. Speaker 10:50 a.m.
Hon. Member for
Asutifi South, please have your seat.
Prof. Gyan-Baffour 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
what I was referring to here is the productivity per acre; that is; by applying the new technologies, one would get more yield per acre than using the old technology. So it is not about the number of trees that would be on it, if you increase the numbers, maybe, you may even end up getting less per acre. So it is not about the number of trees on an acre that I was referring to, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker 10:50 a.m.
Deputy Minister for
Finance and Economic Planning, thank you very much for appearing to answer the Questions.
Item 5 -- Statements.
Mr. E. K. D. Adjaho 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
I am sorry, with the greatest respect my attention has been drawn to a Question which was advertised for this morning, Question number 530. It has been listed for today and no explanation has been given. So I thought the hon. Majority Leader might give some explanation before he moves on to make his Statement.
Mr. Speaker 10:50 a.m.
Hon. Member, we
would deal with that later but if - Majority Leader, do you have any answer to this question?
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
we are tried to secure the Answer but at the time we were going to print it was not ready; and we felt we should go on with the printing. So we will try and find out from the hon. Minister what happened to it later on, and I will advise him accordingly.
Mr. Speaker 10:50 a.m.
All right, let us go on.
STATEMENTS 10:50 a.m.

Majority Leader (Mr. F. K. Owusu- Adjapong) 10:50 a.m.
He lived for those who loved him, for those who knew him true; For the cause that lacked assistance, for the wrong that needed resistance, for the wrong that needed resistance; For the future distance, the good that he could; For the heaven that smiled on him and now keeps his spirit too;
Mr. Speaker, Professor Albert Adu Boahen, a truly distinguished professor emeritus from the Department of History at the University of Ghana of Legon, a fearless and most determined politician and public intellectual has passed to his ancestral home. He died, coincidentally, on the anniversary of his birthday, that is,
May 24, 2006 aged 74.
Born at Osiem in the Eastern Region on May 24, 1934, he schooled at Mfantsipim Secondary School and continued to the University of Ghana where he passed out with a B.A. honours degree in History in 1956. He went on to earn a Ph. D degree in African Studies from the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. In 1959 he was appointed a lecturer at the University of Ghana and rose to the position of a full professor in
1971.
Professor Albert Adu Boahen's stellar publications are legion, but perhaps the flagship of his publications which so much agitated the minds of emerging scholars is Topics in West African History which was published in 1966. The other well known monographs which combined to establish the sterling identify of the man who wrote and also made history are Britain, the Sahara and the Western Sudan 1788 -- 1861 published in 1964; The Revolutionary Years: West African since 1800 published in 1975; African Perspectives on Colonialism and Mfantsipim and the Making of Ghana A Centenary History 1876 - 1976 which was published in 1966. These books…. Out from “the Boahenic industry,” do not exhaust the list of the sartorial and incandescent beauty of the penmanship of “Kontopiat,” a colossus whose spirit sought to pulverize into smithereens. Eurocentric curtains which veiled the Pierre Gordian theories and Hobbesian views that before the European colonial intrusion Africans were in a state of aggravated misery and therefore embraced the divine colonial intervention with unmitigated aplomb.
M r. S p e a k e r, t h r o u g h o u t h i s distinguished career, the redoubtable and
irrepressible Professor did not only concern himself with exorcising Eurocentric ambivalence and mortal violence on African history but also political violence in Ghana in particular and Africa as a whole. Some of his satrirical and prosaic writings, particularly, under the penname “Kontopiaat” typify his endeavour as a public intellectual.
Mr. Speaker, Professor Adu Boahen campaigned tirelessly to root out problems of social inequality, ethnocentrism, nepotism and infantile political disorders epitomized in the military regimes in Ghana. In 1979, he was a Founding Member of the Movement that organized protests against General Ignatius Kutu Acheampong and his Supreme Military Council. He suffered incarceration for four months. Unperturbed, he postulated that the June 4 th, 1979 coup, which topped General Akuffo's SMC II when all operated to have been done for the conduct of a general election to return to the country to civilian constitutional rule, was absolutely unnecessary. He suffered opprobrium for this.
Enter the politics of 1979 and Professor Adu Boahen together with some of his compatriots including ‘Paa Willie', Ofori Atta, General Afrifa, Obed Asamoah, G.W. Amarteifio and others who had rallied opposition forces against Acheampong's Union Government and registered their physical presence in the struggle broke from the mainstream Danquah-Busia formation to form the United National Convention. In the event, the 1979 general election was won by Dr. Hilla Limann's Peoples National Party (PNP).
Mr. Speaker, an indication of the stature of Adu Boahen could be measured from the response of the generality o Ghanaians to the series of lectures he delivered during the ground breaking of J.B. Danquah Memorial Lectures in February 1988. The
Majority Leader (Mr. F. K. Owusu- Adjapong) 11 a.m.
topic of the lectures was “The Ghanaian Sphinx: Reflections on the Contemporary History of Ghana, 1972-1987”. The brilliant and glittering exposition left an indelible mark on the minds of all who had the privilege of listening to him -- the steely courage he plucked to discuss, challenge and analyse the tthen taboo issues shook the foundation of that edifice which had become the status quo.
It indeed marked a watershed which signaled the puncturing of the grotesque balloon of the “culture of silence”. Without doubt, the history of this country was dramatically changed by that singular dare devil enterprise. Subsequently, he and some concerned citizens formed the Movement For Freedom And Justice (MFJ) whose aim was to work for the return of the country to constitutional rule under party political system.
Mr. Speaker, in 1991, not long after his return from the USA, he helped to anchor the Danquah-Busia Club which had been established by Mr. Attakora Gyimah with the support of Dr. John Bilson, Lawyer Obeng Manu (senior), Dr. R.W. Anane, Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu, Victor Owusu Junior and couple of others. In 1992 when the Club transformed itself into a political party, the New Patriotic Party, Professor Adu Boahen emerged as its first Presidential Candidate. The party which he led lost the elections in circumstances which occasioned the documentation of the events. This culminated in the writing of ‘The Stolen Verdict” which described landmarks in an uneven electoral playing field.
Mr. Speaker, regardless of however, and whatever angle or with whatever lens one views it, the book, “The Stolen Verdict” did lead to improvement in the electoral system of the country and the
country has become better off for that. Adu Boaben's era in the New Patriotic Party ended in 1996 when he lost the flagbearership at the Party's Congress to H.E. John Agyekum Kufuor who went on in 2000 to win the Presidency of the country.
In 2001, Professor Adu Boahen suffered a mild stroke and was hospitalized for a while. Just when he appeared to be making a full recovery and was rediscovering his humorous instincts he suffered another bout and since then he had battled to regain his health until he succumbed on May 24th, 2006. He came by the door and departed by the door.

Mr. Speaker, today, we pay tribute to a man of the people; a man of integrity and steely determination; a man who was unassuming, very transparent, incorruptible, principled and fearless, an intellectual colossus and a political luminary whose evergreen ideas and postulations will remain recognsisable, illuminating landmarks in the firmament of contemporary Ghanaian geo-politics.

Whilst we mourn the departure of Professor Albert Adu Boahen today and pray to God to grant him eternal rest, we may sincerely show gratitude to his wife, Auntie Mary, for having the fortitude to stand by her dear husband throughout his travails in hospital.

May the Good Lord replenish the stock of energy, time and resources that she and the rest of the family have expended on this man of honour.

Professor, Nante Yie Kontopiaat, Nyame ne wo ntena.

Mr. Speaker, I thank you sincerely for this singular honour and opportunity to pay this tribute to a truly illustrious son of Ghana.
Dr. K. K. Apraku (NPP - Offinso- North) 11 a.m.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for this opportunity to pay tribute to Prof. Adu Boahen.
I shall start my tribute with a quote from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.
“When he shall die, take him and cut him out in little stars, and he will make the face of heaven so fine that all the world will be in love with night, And pay no worship to the garish sun.” (Romeo and Juliet)
Prof., we need not cut you into little stars, for you have made “the face of Ghana so fine and already in love” with democracy, freedom of the press and of speech.
I am most honoured to pay tribute to Prof. Adu Boahen, a statesman, a courageous man, a visionary, a patriot, a democrat, an eminent intellectual, a village boy who made it great and, indeed, a historian who not only wrote history but also made history.
Very rare do we find historians themselves, after having written the history of others, making history themselves. Such is the case of Prof. Adu Boahen.
Let it not be forgotten in respect of his history-making that during one of the darkest moments of our nation's history, when the forces of evil appeared to have defeated the forces of good, when right seemed wrong and wrong right, when men and women of conscience had become opportunists, when it was safer to keep quiet than to talk, when the world of our sad humanity had assumed the semblance of hell, when mediocrity had rudely replaced excellence, when public discourse was no longer possible,
and a culture of silence had engulfed our nation, for one brief shining moment, there was this simple man, a statesman, and a democrat, a visionary who risked it all to speak out against the abuses, the injustice, the inhumanity, the killings, the beatings, the extortion and intimidation of a regime. He indeed, broke the culture of silence that had been imposed on Ghanaians and accepted because of fear. By so doing, Prof. Adu Boahen became the symbol of our democracy and the beacon of hope for many Ghanaians.
I first came into contact with Prof. Adu Boahen in 1991. He was then a visiting Professor at Cornell University in the United States of America (USA). What had caught his attention was a book I had published in the same year in the USA, entitled “African Émigrés in the United States: A Missing Link In Africa's Social And Economic Development.”
In this book, I had discussed possible contributions that Africans in the United States could make towards Africa's economic and social development.
After interactions with him and discussions of the political state of affairs in our country, he invited me to come to Ghana and I did so in 1991.
With his brilliant and incisive Danquah Memorial Lectures, he had gained the respect, the credibility and the stature not only to challenge the Provisional National Defence Council (PNDC) but also to provide an enlightened democratic leadership for a new Ghana.
For those of us having abroad who might have given up on Ghana due to the political situation at the time, Prof. Adu Boahen, gave a new lease of life.
Mr. Speaker 11:10 a.m.
Hon. Member are you concluding. [Laughter.]
Dr. Apraku 11:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, very close - He brought into politics, the same level of commitment and excellence that he had previously brought into the academia. His campaign inspired a great resurgence
Mr. Speaker 11:10 a.m.
Hon. Member, you may have to conclude.
Dr. Apraku 11:10 a.m.
I am concluding, Mr. Speaker. He contributed significantly to the development of democracy that we enjoy today.
In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I would like to say that as we mourn Prof. Adu Boahen, my prayer and hope remain that someday when the high court of history sits in judgement and asks each of us what we did in our lifetime on earth to advance the course of democracy and development of our dear Ghana, I hope we will be able to say that Ghana was made better because all of us were in this august House.
History made the Professor what he was. For the Professor, history was full of heroes, and if history had made him a hero, Mr. Speaker, maybe, all of us must learn from history.
Prof. damirifa due, due, due ne
amanehun, kontopiaat, I bid you good-bye and may your soul rest in perfect peace.
Mr. E. K. D. Adjaho (NDC -- Avenor) 11:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to add my voice to the tribute ably paid to our departed Professor by the hon. Majority Leader.
Mr. Speaker, for the typical Ghanaian that I am, I will try to stay away from controversy because in paying tribute to the departed I see it more as a solemn occasion and I will do just that even though my hon. Colleagues opposite tried to raise certain issues.
Mr. Speaker, Professor Adu Boahen's place in academia cannot be taken away from him. One might disagree with some of his views but he was a historian of international repute. Mr. Speaker, there was no way that anybody would have passed through the walls of University of Ghana, whether the person was a student of history or not, without knowing of Prof. Adu Boahen. Mr. Speaker, some of us knew him more as an academician than a politician. It was rather in the late 1970's when he and others formed the United National Convention (UNC) that we got to know that he was not only an academician but also a politician.
They formed the UNC in 1979, led by the late Paa Willie - a break away faction, essentially from the UP tradition. Indeed, he was one of the leading spokesmen of that party, but as history has taught us, most of those parties hardly succeed; and that party had only 13 out of the 140 seats in the 1979 General Elections.
Mr. Speaker, it is said that there is a time to be born and a time to die. The history professor is no more. Mr. Speaker, the fact that on hearing of his death so
many people, irrespective of the political divide that they belonged to, rushed to the Professor's house to pay tribute to him and to console the bereaved family shows the stature of the man whose tribute we are paying tribute today. Mr. Speaker, it clearly shows that we may disagree in our political views, and our religious views but we should recognize one another's views; and I believe that is what the death of the Professor has taught all of us.
Mr. Speaker 11:10 a.m.
Do not be distracted, please.
Mr. Adjaho 11:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, it is said in Ewe that amekuku menya be we ye dzram do o; literally interpreted it means that the dead person does not know that they are taking care of him. In other words, when we reward our heroes after their death they would not know that they have even been honoured. Mr. Speaker, we should start learning from his death that we should start honouring our people when they are alive; we should recognize them. We may disagree with their views, Mr. Speaker, but we should recognize their stature.
Mr. Speaker, I think that the professor has lived a fruitful life. He has fully paid his dues to this nation and he deserves to be honoured. But I believe we could still have done better for him when he was alive.
Mr. Speaker, I can only wish that his soul rests in perfect peace.
Deputy Majority Leader (Mr. A. O. Aidooh NPP -- Tema West): Mr.
Mr. A. O. Aidooh 11:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I knew
the late Professor very, very well. He was a democrat to the core whose quest, thirst and hunger for freedom knew no bounds. Mr. Speaker, for those of us who were privileged to work with him, sit with him, eat with him, and think with him, his deeds will forever be our guide. Mr. Speaker, in paying tribute to this great person let me do the most unconventional thing of reading a piece that I wrote about Professor Adu Boahen as it appeared in the Chronicle, Thursday, 16th May, 1996. Mr. Speaker, I quote:
“A salute to Professor Adu Boahen. I met you in the early 1970s when I was a student at the University of Ghana and indeed you taught me African Studies. However, it was not until 1981 when I came to know you better in the days of the Movement for Freedom and Justice. That period also brought me into contact with notables like Mr. Kwesi Pratt, Mr. John Ndebugre, Mr.Nathan Quao, Mr.George Addo, Mr.Kaba (only God knows where
he is now) Mr. Amanor, Mr.Johnny Hansen, late Joe Asante, Dr. F.T. Darko and many others.
You were our leader, inspirer, motivator and idol. Then came the formative years of the present day political parties and your fame, having been catapulted by the famous Danquah memorial lecturers of 1998 made you a hero of the Danquah- Busia club and Ghanaians generally.
In August (or thereabouts) of 1992 you took the NPP congress by storm and won a massive 1121 out of a total vote of 2,000 from six contestants. Subsequent event viewed against the back ground of the 1996 congress are too painful to recount.
From 1991, I like many others have worked dedicatedly for you and the party as the symbol and hope for the future because I saw in you a selfless and courageous mentor and leader. The irony is that the freedom for which you fought so tirelessly gave us the right to judge you independently. In 1992 you were our toast and everybody else's.
In 1996 we spoke differently. Many hearts were broken. What did it matter? The people have spoken.
Professor do not ever say Ghana is not worth dying for. Your dedication to the cause of freedom, your tenacity in the guest for freedom and justice and the fame these attributes have brought you are enough motivation for us and the future generations. You have written history. Now, you have made history. You fought for change through the ballot box. You have been changed through the ballot box. Are you not proud? And for all this what did you get for a reward?
They said you are too old, (at 63), that you do not speak well, full of vengeance and (did I hear) not competent to lead us. How else could they destroy you?
Professor. All that is now history.
Now, you have a break and may have enough time to write yet another book of history. You have a break and may have enough time to write yet another book of history. You've played your part an taken your place in our hearts. So many dislike you. So many love you. A few of us love you dearly and we are happy that you can now take a rest.
You are our father, mentor and guide. Someday you will be fitting rewarded. You have asked us to give J. A. the same support we gave you. That certainly will be done.
Amy Nyaho-Tamakloe, Theresa Tagoe, Wereko Brobbyt, Amo Bediako and all join me to say ‘Professor, Adu Boahen is just another human being playing his part with all his faults. Professor your courage, determination and fortitude will always urge us on.
Mr. Hackman Owusu-Agyemang (NPP -- New Juaben North) 11:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, nature has a way of throwing up a leader to suit the times, and so it was that our dear friend, mentor, and distinguished Professor, Albert Adu Boahen, was given to us at that material time when there was need, to quote the popular “songwriter”, Asem yi adika, whan na ebeka? Iara meka; enye obiara na miara na meka.
Mr. Speaker 11:20 a.m.
Hon. Minister, you will interpret for the benefit of others.
Mr. Owusu-Agyemang 11:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the Constitution allows us to speak vernacular but let me interpret, It says:
“These issues need to be said, articulated; who will say them? Nobody else but I will say them.” In other words, “I will put the point of views across,” and that he did brilliantly by breaking the “culture of silence.” Indeed, at that time I knew him not so well, but I had the courage to call him, and say: “Professor, you have made proud the song-writer who wrote that song. “To say that he was a colossus within our political configuration might even be an understatement, because right now every Ghanaian is convinced of the need for us to be governed by democratic principles and the freedom of choice; that was precisely what he aimed at.
Mr. Speaker, I had the privilege, as the National Treasurer of our party, to work with him closely when he became the Presidential Candidate and I can say that at that point in time my respect for the great Professor even grew deeper. He did everything -- absolutely everything -- transparently and above board. And today we pay homage to this great man who has left us but who has left a legacy, a legacy of fearlessness, to the extent that it is incorporated in our own National Anthem.
Mr. Speaker, I would just conclude by saying to the good Professor 11:20 a.m.
“When the earth shall claim your limbs then shall you begin to dance, and when you reach the top of the hill shall you then begin to climb.” Dear Professor, fare thee well.
Mr. Yaw Baah (NPP -- Kumawu) 11:20 a.m.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for offering me the opportunity to contribute on this day when we are praisisng our departed Professor Adu Boahen.
Mr. Speaker, when it comes to people paying tribute I am as a small fly, but with the rare occasion of having had free interaction with him, dating back to 1979, that was precisely 24th of June when I had written my last paper in Government as
Mr. Speaker 11:30 a.m.
You may be concluding.
Mr. Yaw Baah 11:30 a.m.
Because, if the late President Kwame Nkrumah of the Convention People's Party (CPP) had extended such grieving niceties to the families of the late J.B. Danquah and that of the late Obetsebi Lamptey, the political history of this country would have been a different thing to talk about. That rare achievement or that rare visit by Ex- President Rawlings, today has given us the hope that bridges could be built whatever
Mr. Speaker 11:30 a.m.
Hon. Member, are you concluding?
Mr. Yaw Baah 11:30 a.m.
He formed a realm around him and today, we pride ourselves of having made history. I hope he will have something to tell our ancestors -- J. B. Danquah and Paa Willie.
I thank you Mr. Speaker, for giving me the opportunity.
Mr. Speaker 11:30 a.m.
The next contributors will be given two minutes each. [Laughter.] Hon. Member for Amansie West.
Mr. Kofi Kra Mensah (NPP-- Amansie West) 11:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to pay some tribute to the late Professor Adu Boahen. A great product of “kwabotwe” Mfantsipim School, I met Prof. Adu Boahen when I was a student and he was already a Professor at the University College of Ghana. A great author of many history books, I will remember him specially for being the author of ‘The
Mrs. Cecelia Dapaah (NPP -- Bantama) 11:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I wish to associate myself with the subject on the floor of the House. Mr. Speaker, Professor (Emeritus) Adu Boahen was a patriotic statesman and academician par excellence who walked his talk. He sacrificed his life, intellectually chronicling the history of our dear nation. He also personally and politically made sure that dictatorship was abolished on this our dear land when he broke the culture of silence with his lecture entitled ‘The Ghanaian Sphinx'. I was lucky to be one of the few people who were bold enough to attend those lectures.
He was a man who placed the stability and peace of this nation above all parochial interests in the sense that when things did not go well in 1992 and people expected him to fight on, he lived above the fray. He exercised great self-restraint and rather calmed the tempers of his numerous and teaming supporters.
We pay this fitting tribute to a man who
led a very full political life.
At this juncture, I want to pay a very special tribute to his hardworking and caring wife, Mrs. Mary Adu Boahen, who made sure that the husband had the best care that she could ever give, right from the onset of illness till he passed away. She gave full meaning to marriage being for ‘better for worse' and we the women in Ghana have a lot to learn from this great woman.
This was also a woman who was, in her own right, a political giant. In fact she was the political ally of the great professor. Those of us who were around in the year 1992 and worked with him closely used to affably refer to him, and he to us, as Kontopiat. This indeed shows his sense of humour and his great humility. It is unfortunate that he should be sick and die when this dear nation needs his services most. This was the period he could have chronicled the best history of our time because this Government is doing a lot for this nation.
In fact Professor Adu Boahen can be referred to as one of the most prolific historians that Africa has ever produced. We pay this great tribute to him and we express our condolences to his family, to his dear wife, and to the entire nation.
Alhaji Malik A. Yakubu (NPP -- Yendi) 11:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would also like
to contribute to the Statement of good remembrance of the old professor. May the soul of Professor (Emeritus) Albert Adu Boahen rest in perfect peace.
His academic prowess need not be re-stated because it is notorious enough. I remember the famous radio and television programmes of Aliu Mazrui who was touted to be a great historian drank deep the knowledge of professor Adu Boahen when he came to Ghana to do his research.
A lot of Ghanaians, hundreds of thousands of Ghanaian students will attest to the fact that they drank up his knowledge through his history books, both in the secondary schools and the universities. He has left an indelible mark for all scholars in the works that he did as an academician.
The striking thing about the late professor was the very simple personality he exuded. Very unassuming, he commanded lots of respect from his fellow scholars; he commanded a lot of respect from his students and from the general public just because he put up a personality that was attractive. He was not abrasive but beneath that simplicity was a very, very brave man; a very simple man committed to the truth regardless of whose ox was gored. It was this character he brought into Ghanaian politics in such a manner that hardly does a nation appreciate the full impact of Professor's contribution to the state in which we are today.
11. 40 a.m.
I think the great historian made history and I believe that history itself would judge him as one of the greatest Ghanaians that we have had. And I think the truth which he put out in politics blended with unalloyed bravery, should be a lesson to all of us that politics need not be
trickery; politics can be based on truth and upholding valued principles. I had known him very closely when we formed the New Patriotic Party (NPP) together as somebody who always held into the truth and if you brought any lies to him; he would tell you in the face that he did not believe you.
So I think the contributions that are being made are a testimony to the character of this great man, a man of sterling qualities. And all we can do in order to ensure everlasting memory to him, is for all of us to exhibit the political maturity, the political wisdom, and appreciate the fact that he pursued everything with a clear vision. I think that if we adopt this and put it into our body politic, then he would rest very contented in his grave. May his soul rest in perfect peace.
Mr. Mahama Ayariga (NDC --
Bawku Central): Mr. Speaker, as a student of history at the Ordinary and Advanced levels and first year in the University, I was in constant touch with the great writings of Professor Adu Boahen. Mr. Speaker, I drunk so much from the knowledge of that great Professor. Indeed, I regret to say that my only personal interaction with that great Professor, was one day when I was in the Balme Library looking for a history book, and I noticed him also standing there and looking through the books.
He picked one of them and I was courageous enough to walk to him and greeted him as a first year university student. That was the very brief interaction I had with the great Professor. But my observation of his activities as a politician, of course, started when I left the University and when he became very active in national politics, at least, from my observation at that time.
Minister for Information and National Orientation (Mr. Kwamena Bartels) 11:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to associate myself with the tribute that is being paid to this great son of our country.
First of all, I happened to have had the
fortune of attending the great school which Professor Adu-Boahen also attended; and of course there is only one school -- Mfantsipim School. He went further to write about this school and the great achievement of people who have come out of Mfantsipim School. It is a school that he was so proud of that he always liked to associate with every son or daughter because there were old students of Mfantsipim School who were ladies, who came out of that school.
Mr. Speaker, I need not speak about his
courage. This is the man who singularly spoke out when others could not speak, breaking the culture of silence at the Danquah Memorial Lectures and showing this country that there were men, and that there were men.
Mr. Speaker, he contested as the
presidential candidate of the New Patriotic Party and lost to former President J. J. Rawlings. But he remained such a loyal and supportive party member even onto his death. He was, in my own estimation, the historians' historian. Very few people can compare, in terms of the history of West Africa, and even of Africa to Professor Adu Boahen. Mr. Speaker, he has left his feet and his marks in the sands of time. We can only say that on these shores that we call Ghana once walked a man called Professor Adu Boahen. My
heart goes out to his family, especially his wife and the children who have lost such a great, great person in their family. This nation has lost a great son and we all mourn with the family, especially the wife and the children.
Mr. Speaker, I thank you for the opportunity.
Minister for Women and Children's
Affair (Hajia Alima Mahama): Mr. Speaker, I rise to add my voice to the Statement made today in the House.
Mr. Speaker, the time I was in secondary school, Professor Adu Boahen's name was known to every secondary school student in the country. I had the occasion to read his books which were written by a scholar.
Mr. Speaker, in my adult life, I also got to know Professor Adu-Boahen from my marital family because he was a family friend of my marital family. I met Professor Adu-Boahen again when I was appointed as a Minister, when I joined politics full swing. Unfortunately at that time Professor Adu Boahen was not well. Yes, he was a scholar; he was a politician per excellence, a great statesman.
But what I also want us to remember of him today is that he was charming. He was charming in every sense of the word. Even in his sick bed, any time I went to visit him the wife will say, “Prof. your daughter has come” and he will broadly smile and that always made my day. It was not surprising that he was a charming person and he had a charming smile; he made the impact on anybody who met him.
There is no one who met Professor Adu Boahen without thinking that this was a different person and this was an excellent human being, very kind-natured, and soft spoken, even though he could be hard-spoken when he wanted to but
very charming. No doubt, that was the reason why he was able to gather with our political leaders to bring the United Party (UP) tradition back as a very strong party, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) and today we are in government. This was part of his charm.
Mr. Speaker, indeed, while everyone would remember him as a scholar and a statesman, I would remember him as a charming personality.
Mr. Speaker, on this occasion my heart reaches out to his family, to the wife and to the children. I sympathise with them and all I would tell them is, every living soul will experience death but once; and that is the way that every individual will go. He has come, he has served and everybody is a witness to the service that he has rendered not only to Ghana but to mankind. So the family should seek solace in the fact that this was indeed a great personality who influenced a lot of individuals but also a lot of groups not only in Ghana but in the whole universe. I tell them that they should take heart; we all sympathise with them and we are with them on this occasion of mourning. Prof. the very charming personality, I wish you God's peace, I wish you well, and may your soul rest in peace.
Deputy Minister for Energy (Mr. K. T. Hammond): Mr. Speaker, when Julius Caesar died and Mark Anthony went to bury him, he said that “the good that men do is often interred with their bones, but the evil lives after them.” Mr. Speaker, I believe passionately that in the case of Professor, the good that he did would not be interred with his bones; it would live after him.
I got to hear the title, “doctor”, I believe at that time it was Dr. Adu Boahen when I was a little boy at Yeji and then the word Kontopiat came about and I wanted
Minister for Information and National Orientation (Mr. Kwamena Bartels) noon
to know what was Kontopiat and they said to me that there is a Professor at the University of Ghana who has been writing things and he said something about Kontopiat. Mr. Speaker, that is where I got to hear about him.
Mr. Speaker, then I went to secondary school and I started reading history and I came to hear a bit more about him. It went on to the extent that his book, “Topics in West Africa History” -- I have grown a bit so I cannot recite it -- Mr. Speaker, I could start from page 1 of the book to the very last page of the book and tell whatever was in there. I still remember the section where he wrote that Ghana empire like its successors the states of Mali and Songhai rose to fame, prosperity and power for the following reasons - and Mr. Speaker, I could itemize all the reasons Mr. Speaker, that was Professor Adu Boahen's influence on some of us.

Mr. Speaker, it was also the case that I really wanted to read history at the university because of Professor Adu- Boahen. Incidentally when I got in there, there were other influences and I ended up at the Law Faculty where, indeed, I met one of Professor Adu Boahen's children, Samuel Adu Boahen who was my mate. Of course hon. Benjamin Kunbuor was also there so he knows that.

Mr. Speaker, then I left the country to England.

The first time we met Professor Adu Boahen was in 1993 just after the elections and as hon. Member for Kumawu (Mr. Yaw Baah) indicated, Mr. Speaker, some of us were surprised. We were shocked because we had heard about the famous speech - “How the Culture of Silence

was Broken” and Mr. Speaker, we saw the man who broke the culture of silence and we asked ourselves, “How could this man have stood up to the bestiality that was going on in the country?” We were full of admiration for him. Mr.. Speaker, he spoke and thereafter he left.

Mr. Speaker, I know that by his death, history students, historians, and researchers have lost a great deal. Mr. Speaker, I also do know that his death will not be in vain, if only because he was the person to break the culture of silence, journalists, media practitioners, politicians, Mr. Speaker, we are all better of because of Professor Adu Boahen. Who knows how many of these radio stations, the FM stations would have been churning out the kind of things that they are churning out? Who knows how many of these papers, some of which, Mr. Speaker, with respect, I will call gutter press -- [Laughter] -- May the Almighty Lord keep the Professor in His blissful arm because death is a necessary end and, Mr. Speaker, it comes when it will come. God be with him and he should rest in His own blissful arms till we all meet up with him. Professor, Damirifa due and dayie. Thank you very much Mr. Speaker.

Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs,

National Integration and NEPAD (Mr. Akwasi Osei-Adjei): Thank you very much. I am the Member of Parliament for Ejisu Juaben where Professor Adu Boahen comes from or came from. Mr. Speaker, in fact, he was a good constituent. I never had the opportunity of him teaching me at the History Department of the University of Ghana but I came to know Professor Adu Boahen in 1992 when I was a parliamentary candidate for Ejisu Juaben and I was introduced to him and the first thing, like he asked hon. S. K. B. Manu, was “Do you think you are up to this job?” and I said “Prof. I will try my best.”

Mr. Speaker, from then on this man

became my father, my mentor, my everything. Just like an hon. Member said, that he is not quite sure of the boycott, if he led it, perhaps to him, the inference is, he is not sure whether it was a good decision. But Mr. Speaker, we shall leave it to posterity; history will judge whether it was a good thing. But for me, it was the best decision at that time. Mr. Speaker, not that we boycotted it, but there were committees which were working to ensure that Ghana's democracy was deepened and Ghana's democracy continued.

Mr. Speaker, because of the boycott, a lot of things came to light which hon. Balado Manu mentioned but he did not mention examples. Through the boycott we were able to have what we call the Inter-party Advisory Council; through the boycott we had what we call the transparent ballot box which we are having today; through the boycott we were able to have what we call a level playing field so that every political party will have the chance of winning elections.

And I believe, Mr. Speaker, in Africa here, it is not that easy that opposition parties win elections. Even in the developed economies, opposition parties normally do not win; one party will stay in for years and years and years before another party comes up. But look at us now in Ghana, we changed governments through the ballot box. Another government came and my hon. Friends opposite have the confidence that maybe some time, some day, they will come back to government. But Mr. Speaker, this is the result of what Professor Adu Boahen stood for.

The changes he made to ensure that we have full confidence in our electoral system, in balloting so that no one man can one day pick up a gun and go and stand at the radio stations and abolish Parliament,

abolish the Presidency, leave the courts and other institutions not working and yet you find the lawyers and other people running to them secretly in the night and then forming kangaroo governments and kangaroo courts in Ghana here. I do not think, Mr. Speaker, it will work these days because of what he believed in. He instilled confidence in our body-politic so that we would know that each party has an opportunity of forming a government once the people accept it to be the legitimate party.

Mr. Speaker, he is gone. The people of Juaben whom I represent are today mourning and a lot of hon. Friends are here saying only Kontopiat -- No, in Juaben, he has another nick name which is atiko and if hon. Members take the advantage of attending the funeral, before they get to Juaben there will see that there is a small stream on the left, there is a small pot on the left too with a stool there and that is atiko. I hope that on their way back, they would just bow their heads to atiko and then at the same time bow their heads to Prof. Adu Boahen as the man of peace, the man of wisdom, the man of courage and the man of humility.

Mr. Speaker, we wish him fare-thee- well.

The people of Ejisu Juaben are mourning him; the people of Ashanti are mourning him; the people of Ghana are mourning him; and the people of Africa in general are mourning him. In fact, the whole world would mourn Professor Albert Kwadwo Adu Boahen. I thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Yaw Osafo-Maafo (NPP -- Akim Oda) noon
Mr. Speaker, I want to associate myself with the tribute to Professor emeritus Albert Adu Boahen, a man of many parts. I met Professor Adu Boahen for the first time in 1965 after the death
Mr. Yaw Osafo-Maafo (NPP -- Akim Oda) 12:10 p.m.
of J.B. Danquah in prison. There was an emergency meeting of the National Union of Ghana Students at Legon and we paid a courtesy call on him for advice. I am sure not all of us here were born. Mr. Speaker, from that day I formed my own impressions of him.
He was a man of conviction and he took decisions which sometimes he did not care whether you agreed with him or not. He was principled in his own way and stood to defend his decisions. Physically, Professor Adu Boahen is certainly not a giant, but intellectually, talk about giants and he was certainly one. Professor Adu Boahen was a democrat and he was a democrat with a difference because he believed in fair play. Those of us who were at his famous lecture which people now describe as having broken the “culture of silence” .
If you were there and listened to the questions put to him by various lecturers and various members of the Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences, you could see that in his view he stood for what he believed in. Professor Adu Boahen as a historian paid particular attention to the movement of the various tribes of Ghana from the northern part of Africa.

Indeed, he told many of us about how the Akans moved from the southern part of Sudan and he traced it right down to where we are today. Today, Prof. Adu Boahen is no more but what he stood for is what we as Members of Parliament should look at. Prof. Adu Boahen did not believe in backbiting; he believed in telling it as it was and in the face of those concerned. He was a man of courage. He was a man of vision.

Mr. Speaker, a couple of hon. Members have touched on the role Mrs. Adu Boahen played when he was sick. Many women would not go through the tribulations Mrs. Adu Boahen went through. And indeed, we have all learnt of that the saying in the Bible, “for better, for worse,” Mrs. Adu Boahen lived it.

Mr. Speaker, this party of ours, the New

Patriotic Party (NPP), would not be where it is today but for Prof. Albert Adu Boahen. We cannot talk about the NPP without talking about Prof. Albert Adu Boahen.

May his soul rest in perfect peace.

Mr. E. T. Mensah (NDC -- Ningo/

Prampram): Mr. Speaker, I rise to add my voice to the tribute on the floor. I will start by saying that to everything there is a season, a time for everything under the sun, like the Ecclesiastes, there is, “a time to be born and a time to die.” He was once upon a time born. Today he is dead.

Mr. Speaker, I knew Prof. Adu Boahen

as a personal friend even though I was younger than he was. He always got me to prepare his financial statements for him. He wanted to know up-to-date what his balances were and stuff like that. And in the base of the Movement for Freedom and Justice (MFJ), we were young activists circulating leaflets here and there. I enjoyed and religiously attended all his lectures. Prof. Adu Boahen later became my in-law through marriage because one of his nephews got married to my niece. So we became very close.

And when he was at the 37 Military Hospital, I visited him several times and found how lonely he was. The way people have rushed to pay tributes both in and out here, if we had given him that brotherly love that he had before he was taken ill, I believe that he would have lived a little bit longer and we would have postponed the tributes that we are paying here today. -- [Hear! Hear!] -- I believe that these
Mr. Speaker 12:10 p.m.
Hon. Members, at this stage, I ask you all to be up standing and observe a minute's silence in his memory.

May his soul rest in peace. Amen.
PAPERS 12:10 p.m.

MOTIONS 12:20 p.m.

Alhaji Amadu Sorogho (NDC -- Abokobi/Madina) 12:20 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to second the motion. In so doing, I would state that, yes, just like the Chairperson has indicated, the Committee did sit down for quite a number of days, all the stakeholders were consulted and there is no doubt that Amerada Hess is one of the companies that would definitely push our petroleum agenda forward. Mr. Speaker, I think in debating it, there was consensus;
we all agreed that the company needed to be supported and for that matter there is no doubt - We have not had any problem at all, having been briefed as to what the company intends to do. We have taken time and gone through all the agreements and we have realised that it is consistent with the existing petroleum agreements and for that matter we hope that the whole House would unanimously adopt the report and support the company so that Ghana as a whole can also benefit from the agreement.
Question proposed.
Mr. Yaw Baah (NDC -- Kumawu) 12:20 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, thank you for offering me the opportunity as a Member of the Committee to contribute to the motion. Mr. Speaker, we have all realised the importance of black gold, that is, petroleum in the global politics of today. Today the price of oil which keeps on escalating calls for a need for this nation to attend to or to revisit the issue of petroleum politics. As at now, the price of petroleum is -- I am talking of the crude oil -- It is over $75 today and we do not know, considering what is hovering around the waters of the Mediterranean, specifically, the Israel, the Palestinian and Syrian confrontations, we would not be surprised if tomorrow the price gets to $100.
It is against this background that we are happy today, and I am calling on hon. Members to vote massively for the adoption of this motion. As we are all aware, exploration calls for massive capital and as such we are very fortunate to have had such a company which, is, as hon. Members are aware, involved in exploration of oil in the current oil producing nations like Equatorial Guinea and others.
I am not a hydraulic engineer or a topographical engineer, but if my ‘A' level Geography is anything to go by Ghana should have massive oil at its waters considering where we are located. This is because if we look around us, there is the likelihood for oil to be drilled in the waters of Ghana. Mr. Speaker, it is hoped and we all know that as far as 1977 or 1978 we were made to know that oil reserves had been found in Ghana, but to date what we have been producing is nothing to write home about because it is in minimal quantities for us to
Therefore, with hon. Members
adopting this motion it would offer us the opportunity, especially this company which is well known in exploration - And the duration, if you look at the agreement this is welcome news. And with such comments I urge hon. Members to vote massively in adopting this motion so that this nation would overcome our major problem, for which we have been looking up for solutions, that is, Ghana becoming an oil exporting nation.
Mr. John Mahama (NDC -- Bole/
Bamboi): Mr. Speaker, just to say a few words. Mr. Speaker, we keep approving these exploratory treaties and there have been so many that we have approved over the last several years. Mr. Speaker, I wonder why the oil is being so elusive and I think that if the Minister for Energy could come and give this House a Statement about the progress of work and what the hopes are and the processes we still have to go through so that this House can be apprised of what exactly the situation is. Year in, year out we approve new concessions to various companies for exploration and I think that it would be in order if this House gets some feedback on what is actually happening.
But Mr. Speaker, I wish to say that
Mr. Yaw Baah (NDC -- Kumawu) 12:30 p.m.
whilst we are looking for oil we must also look at how we can reduce our expenditure on imported oil. We are aware that it is the single largest expenditure item in our budget, that is, importation of crude oil and I think that it is high time that Government put in place measures to try and push forth the idea of conservation in order that we cut down on oil expenditure.

Mr. Speaker, there are several things that many countries are doing in this regard. Some countries have introduced a fuel called ethanol. The President recently went to Brazil and I am hoping that, that is one of the industries he would have had the opportunity to look at, where they are using sugarcane and brewing ethanol that they use to power motor vehicles. There is also the bio-diesel that is being used in certain countries to reduce reliance on crude oil.

Mr. Speaker, there are also new

vehicles called hybrid vehicles that run on an electric motor and on fuel. Already, companies like Toyota have them in mass production. There is one model called the Toyota Prius that runs on an electric motor and on fuel, and other car companies are beginning to produce these vehicles. If we could introduce a policy that removes all taxes and duties on such vehicles and encourage people to bring some of them in, I think that we will be contributing to reducing our oil consumption while at the same time hoping that the Ministry of Energy would speed up work and wherever that oil is -- I am sure it is there somewhere - they should find it in our life time so that the prosperity will affect us too, not only our children and our grandchildren.
Mr. K. T. Hammond 12:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker,
the hon. Member was laughing and I was also laughing; there is a reason for that. There is mutuality of our understanding in that respect.
Mr. Speaker, my prayer really is that oil
is found at the time when K. T. Hammond is the Deputy Minister and John Agyekum Kufuor is the President of the Republic of Ghana. I have been praying and everybody knows I am personally praying to achieve that. So may I invite him to help me in my prayers and supplications to the Almighty God so that we find the oil.
Mr. Speaker, there is no doubt, I share
it, that there is oil in Ghana. The difficulty again, as he put it is so explicitly, it is so illusive. Mr. Speaker, it is the experience of so many other countries, you drill and drill and when you are so exasperated and you want to pack your bag and get going, you drill the last one and you will find it. I think that is what is happening in Ghana; we have been doing the drilling. I think in the fullness of time, perhaps the House would have to be informed or apprised of what is going on with respect to our exploration activity. But we are doing very well and we hope that in the fullness of time, God willing, we will hit it.
Mr. Speaker, I thank you very much
for the contributions made, particularly by the Chairman of the Committee. Amerada Hess is a very serious company. Mr. Speaker, you will see from the document that the money that they are going to invest in this project is close to $70 million and by its very nature, if you drill and you drill dry holes, the $70 million goes down the drain. I am sorry; it is a very serious venture.
Mr. Speaker, I invite the House to adopt the report of the Committee.
Question put and motion agreed to.
RESOLUTION 12:30 p.m.

Mr. E. K. D. Adjaho 12:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to second the motion.
Question put and motion agreed to.
Resolved accordingly.
GOG/GNPC/Tullow(Gh.) Ltd./Sabre Oil and Gas Ltd./Kosmos Energy
(Gh.) Ltd.
Chairman of Committee (Mrs. Gifty E. Kusi) 12:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move; That this honourable House adopts the Report of the Committee on Mines and Energy on the Petroleum Agreement amongst the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation, Tullow (Ghana) Limited, Sabre Oil and Gas Limited and Kosmos Energy (Ghana) Limited in respect of Deep Water Tano Contract Area.
Mr. Speaker, in so doing I would crave your indulgence to present the report of the Committee.
Introduction
The Agreement was laid before the House on 28th June 2006 by the Minister for Energy, hon. Joseph Kofi Addah, and was referred to the Committee on Mines and Energy for consideration and report in accordance with article 103(3) of the 1992 Republican Constitution of Ghana and Pursuant to Standing Orders No. 188 of the House.
2.0 Reference Document
i. The 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana;
ii. Standing Orders of the House;
i i i . P e t r o l e u m ( E x p l o r a t i o n and Production) Law; and
iv. The Petroleum Income Tax Law
Alhaji A. B. Sorogho (NDC - Abokobi-Madina) 12:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to second the
motion, and in so doing indicate to the House that we did not have any problem at all when we went through the Report.
Mr. Speaker, as the Chairperson said, we met the stakeholders, and as has already been indicated, we have all been praying very hard that one day we would also be able to get oil so that we can reduce the influx of oil and the vagaries of our economy which is always dependent upon prices of oil.
Mr. Speaker, I therefore urge the House to adopt the Report without any further delay.
Question proposed.
Mr. A. K. Agbesi (NDC - Ashaiman) 12:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to make a few comments on this Report; and I am
referring to page 7 of the Report, under ‘Observations'.
Mr. Speaker, I am quoting from Observations -
“The Committee is of the view that considering the extensive work and investments made in the existing discoveries, GNPC should have negotiated for a higher tallied interest than 12.5 per cent”.
Mr. Speaker 12:30 p.m.
Which page?
Mr. Adjaho 12:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, the hon.
Member for Ashaiman (Mr. Agbesi) is misleading the House. That is another motion that is yet to be moved, and therefore he is referring to the wrong Report.
rose
Mr. Speaker 12:30 p.m.
Hon. Member for Ashaiman, you may wish to resume your seat.
Mr. Agbesi 12:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think I will sit down for the mean time.
Question put and motion agreed to.
RESOLUTION 12:30 p.m.

Mr. K. T. Hammond 12:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move;
WHEREAS by the provisions of article 268(1) of the Constitution, any transaction, contract or undertaking involving the grant of a right or concession by or on behalf of any person or body of persons howsoever described, for the exploitation of any mineral, water or other natural resource of Ghana made or entered into after the coming into force of the Constitution is made subject to ratification by Parliament. IN PURSUANCE of the said article 268(1) of the Constitution, the Government of Ghana has caused to be laid before Parliament through the Minister responsible for Mines the Petroleum Agreement amongst the Government of Ghana, Ghana National Petroleum Corporation, Tullow (Ghana) Limited, Sabre Oil and Gas Limited and Kosmos Energy (Ghana) Limited in respect of Deep Water Tano Contract Area.
NOW THEREFORE, this House in accordance with the said article 268 (1) of the Constitution hereby resolve to ratify the said Petroleum Agreement amongst the Ghana National Petroleum Petroleum Corporation, Tullow (Ghana) Limited, Sabre Oil and Gas Limited and Komos Energy (Ghana) Limited in respect of Deep Water Tano Contract Area.
Mr. A. O. Aidooh 12:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to second the motion.
Question put and motion agreed to.
Resolved accordingly.

Suspension of Standing Order 80 (1)
Mrs. Kusi 12:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, That notwithstanding the provisions of Standing Order 80 (1) which require that no motion shall be debated until at least forty-eight hours have elapsed between the date on which notice of the motion is given and the date on which the motion is moved, the motion for the adoption of the Report of the Committee on Mines and Energy on the Petroleum Agreement amongst the Ghana National Petroleum Agreement amongst the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation, Tullow (Ghana) Limited and Sabre Oil and Gas Limited in respect of Shallow Water Tano Contract Area may be moved today.
Mr. E. M. Ennin 12:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to second the motion and to urge Colleague hon. Members to adopt the motion.
Question put and Motion agreed to.
Mrs. Kusi 12:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, That this honourable House adopts the Report of the Committee on Mines and Energy on the Petroleum Agreement amongst GNPC Tullow (Ghana) Limited and Sabre Oil and Gas Limited in respect of Shallow Water Tano Contract Area.
Introduction
The Agreement was laid before the House by the Minister for Energy Hon. Joseph Kofi Adda on Tuesday 27th June 2006 and was subsequently referred to the Committee on Mines and Energy for consideration and Report in Accordance article 103 of the 1992 Republican Constitution of Ghana and standing orders No. 103(2) of the House.
Reference Documents
In considering the Agreements, the Committee made reference to the following documents:
i. The 1992 Republican Constitution of Ghana
ii. The Standing Orders of the House
i i i . P e t r o l e u m ( E x p l o r a t i o n and Production) Law 1984
PNDCL 84
Background Information
The Petroleum Agreements was
negotiated within the framework of the Petroleum exploration Law 1984, PNDC Law 84 and the model Petroleum Agreements that has served as guide for previous Agreements that has to be singed and approved by the House for operations of companies interested in the exploration and production of petroleum in Ghana.
Tullow Ghana Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tullow Oil Plc of Dublin, Ireland. Sabre Oil and Gas (Ghana) Limited. Sabre Oil and Gas (Ghana) Limited is incorporated in Aberdeen, Scotland. The Contract Area is offshore in the shallow water Tano Basin and covers an area of approximately 983 sq. km. It has three existing discoveries, namely: the North Tano field, which predominantly a gas field with estimated reserves of about 73 billion cubic feet of gas (BDF); the South Tano field, which has oil and gas reserves estimated at 14.3 million barrels of oil (MMBO) and 120 BCF of gas respectively; and the West Tano field which contains heavy crude oil estimated at 4.17 MMBO.
These fields were discovered between 1978 and 2000 by Philips Petroelum Company and Dana plc, respectively, but were not developed because of their marginal size and the absence at that time, of a local market for the gas. The area surrounding these fields has good exploration potential.
Purpose of the Agreement
The Agreement seeks the ratification of the House of the Petroleum Agreement negotiated between the Government of Ghana and the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation on the one hand, and Tullow Ghana Limited and Sabre Oil and Gas Ghana Limited for the conduct of Petroleum Exploration and Production Operations in the Shallow Water Tano Contract Area of the Republic of Ghana.
Terms of Agreement
Under the terms of the Agreement, the Contractor in association with GNPC will undertake a programme of appraisal and exploration in the designated area. Contractor will be responsible for 100% carried interest and Contractor will have 871/2% equity interest.
a. Exploration Period
The agreement provides for an appraisal/exploration period of six and a half 6 1/2 years that is divided as follows:
i. An Initial Appraisal Period of two (2) years; and/or
ii. Initial Exploration Period of two and half (21/2) years to run concurrently with the Initial Appraisal Period; plus
iii.Two (2) extension periods totalling four (4) years:
1. Two (2) years for the first such period i.e. First Extension Period; and
2. Two (2) years for the second of such periods i.e. Second Extension Period.
b. Minimum Work Programme and Maximum Expenditure Obligation
The Contractor's minimum work programme and minimum expenditure obligation for the six-and-a-half-year period are as follows:
(i) Initial Appraisal Period
The Contractor shall reprocess and interpret 814 square kilometres of existing Tano Shallow Water 3D seismic data and
Mrs. Kusi 12:50 p.m.
If Appraisal Well is successful, submit a Development Plan; and then, drill an additional one (1) Appraisal Well within the next twelve (12) months following the Appraisal Well stated above; or
I f the f i rs t Appraisa l Wel l i s unsuccessful, undertake the exploration work stated in the initial exploration period as follows:
(ii) Initial Exploration Period
In addition to work stated in 4(b)(i) (1), the Contractor shall again drill one (1) Exploration Well within eighteen (18) months following the end of the first Appraisal Well.
Contractor's Minimum Expenditure for the work in the Initial Appraisal and/or Exploration Period is estimated at Twenty Million Dollars (US$20,000,000).
First Extension Period:
The Contractor shall Drill at least one (1) Exploration Well.
Contractor's Minimum Expenditure Obligation for the work in the First Extension Period is United States Dollars ten million (US$10,000,000).
Second Extension Period:
The Contractor shall Drill at least one (1) Exploration Well.
T h e C o n t r a c t o r 's M i n i m u m Expenditure Obligation for the work in the Second Extension Period is United States Dollars ten million (US$10,000,000).
The Contractor has no relinquishment obligation at the of the Initial Exploration
Period. However, Contractor is obliged to relinquish 50%of the Contract Area at the beginning of the Second Extension Period.
c. Fiscal Package
The following is the fiscal package negotiated and agreed between the State, GNPC and the Contractor I the event of a commercial discovery.
1. General terms
Royalty Oil 50 per cent
Gas 3 per cent
GNPC Carried Interest Oil 12 1/2 per cent
I n t e r e s t Gas 10 per cent
G N P C A d d i t i o n a l I n t e r e s t Oil 10 per cent
Petroleum Income Tax 35 per cent
Observations
Mr. Speaker, the Committee observed that the Contract Area is under discussion has three existing discoveries, namely the
North Tano Fields which is predominantly gas with an estimated reserve of about 73 billion cubic feet of gas (BCF); the South Tano Field, which has a gas reserve estimated at 14.3 million barrels of oil (MMBO) and 120 BCF of gas respectively; and the West Tano Fields which contains heavy crude oil estimated at 4.47 MMBO.
The Committee initially raised questions with regards to the 12.5% carried interest to the GNPC considering the extensive work and investments made in the existing discoveries are marginal in nature and considering the fact that, no commercial discoveries have been made in Ghana so far, any attempt to increase the carried interest would scare away investors. In order to make up for this, the agreement has provided for GNPC to have the option of acquiring additional interest of 10% in the event of commercial discoveries. This explanation was unanimously accepted by members of the committee.
Mr. Speaker, your Committee observed that the exploration works to be carried out in the adjourning areas of the existing fields, would further stimulate interest in t he hydrocarbon potentials of the offshore areas of Ghana and would therefore attract more investors into the petroleum sector of our economy. Consequently, oil and gas discoveries would generate revenue and employment for the development of
the country.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Committee wishes to state that in view of the socio-economic, technical and financial benefits the Country will gain in the event of Commercial discoveries, the Committee recommends to the House to adopt its report and ratify the Agreement in accordance with article 268 of the 1992 Republican Constitution of Ghana.

2. Additional Oil Entitlements (AOE) -- The State shall receive AOE upon the attain- ment of specific rate of return (ROR) as follows:

(ROR) THRESHOLDS (AOE)

Less that 18 per cent 0 per cent

Greater than or egual to 18 per cent but less than 23 per cent 10 per cent

Greater than or equal to 23 per cent but less than 28 per cent 15 per cent

Greater than or equal to 29 per cent but less than 33 per cent 20 per cent

Greater than 33 per cent 25 per cent

Initial Exploration Period $75,000/year

First Extension Period $75,000/year

Second Extension Period $75,000/year

Development and Production Area $100/sq/km/year

Mr. A. O. Aidooh (NPP - Tema

West): Mr. Speaker, I rise to support the motion and to respond to the concerns raised by my hon. Friend on the other side.

Mr. Speaker, Ghana is not the only country that has these resources and Ghana is not the only country that is seeking investments. Mr. Speaker, the points raised by my hon. Colleague were discussed for two long days at the committee level. In fact, throughout his submissions he has not been able to cite one instance, either locally or outside Ghana, where any country in those circumstances had been able to attract more than 2.5 per cent interest for its investments in these areas.

Mr. Speaker, the Ghana National

Surface Rentals -- US Dollars/year Surface rentals due to the State throughout the terms of the Agreement are as follows:

Petroleum Corporation (GNPC) normally takes 10 per cent interest in these ventures and it is because the country has made some investments in the Tano area that is why we were able to exact 2.5 per cent extra to get the 12 1/2 per cent.

Mr. Speaker, we were told at the Committee level that when the GNPC tried to even ask for 13 per cent, just 0.5 per cent extra, the investors said they would go away and that they would not give more than 2.5 per cent. We were also told that la Cote d'Ivoire and other countries that went for higher interests had all the companies walking away and then they had to call them and re-negotiate for lower rates. So in the absence of any comparative study that Ghana can earn more by way of interests or that any country has done that,
Mr. A. K. Agbesi (NDC - Ahaiman) 12:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to urge this House not to ratify this agreement in the interest of Ghana, in the interest of the economy, in the interest of all of us. This agreement, the best the Committee should do is to withdraw it, go back for further work and come back before the House.
Mr. Speaker, this is an agreement they are asking us to ratify for discoveries. Mr. Speaker, by your Committee's Report there are existing discoveries in three places, as the hon. Member has already mentioned. Mr. Speaker, why do we have to ratify an agreement again for the company to go back and do discoveries? It is a waste of resources; it will not be in the interest of this country. Mr. Speaker, I will urge hon. Members not to ratify it. Mr. Speaker, the Committee itself is clear in its mind that GNPC -- this our body called GNPC - should have negotiated for a higher tallied interest than the 12 per cent that they have done. Mr. Speaker, if GNPC is for the interest of this nation, the question is, why did they not go and do a better job for better interest rates than what they have done. The Committee has found it and I believe and I urge the House to ask the Committee that if this is the position they should go back and request that a better work be done for a higher interest, for the interest of this country.
Mr. Speaker, it is further down in the Report that consequently, oil and gas discoveries would generate revenue and
Minister for Justice (Mr. Kwame Osei- Prempeh) 12:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, thank you for the opportunity to speak to this motion.
Mr. Agbesi 12:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, the Deputy
Attorney General has made a statement that we have not fully understood the terms [Interruption] - that is exactly what he is saying. Mr. Speaker, that is not true. He
is trying to say that we do not understand the Rport that has been presented; -- the report is in black and white. I can read, just as he can also read. Mr. Speaker, I have understood it and in the way it is written it is here in black and white. The -- going to class one. He cannot say that I do not understand the Report. Mr. Speaker, I take special exception to the words he has used and I think that he should withdraw those words because it is belittling my intelligence. He is trying to belittle my intelligence. I take special exception to those words and I think that he should withdraw them.
Mr. Speaker 12:50 p.m.
Deputy Attorney
General, this is over to you.
Mr. Osei-Prempeh 12:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker,
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu 12:50 p.m.
On a point of
order. Mr. Speaker, whether he withdraws those offensive words or not, we all have copies of the Committee's Report and which argument he refers to hon. A. K. Agbesi (Member of Parliament for Ashaiman) and my good self. Maybe he has failed to read it. Mr. Speaker, I want to refer you to the second paragraph of the Committee's Report which supports the argument we have articulated so far. So
for anybody to say that we do not seem to understand is neither here nor there.
Mr. Speaker 1 p.m.
Hon. Members, please let us have decorum.
Mr. Osei-Prempeh 1 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I have read that portion of the Report. But Mr. Speaker, it is unfortunate that my hon. Friends find only that portion interesting and have decided to highlight that.
Dr. Kunbuor 1 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am rising on a point of order because my hon. Colleague is misleading the House. My hon. Colleague is unaware that any company that has come for exploration in relation to oil in this country has come for a very specific output. There is no single company that has signed a contract
Dr. Kumbour 1 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, my point of order is that unless he can give us evidence - [Interruptions.]
Mr. Speaker 1 p.m.
Order! Order!
Dr. Kunbuor 1 p.m.
Unless my hon. Colleague can give us evidence of a company that was asked to find oil in this country and did not find it, he should withdraw his statement because we are supposed to be an investor-friendly country and we should not use the parliamentary floor to cast aspersions at companies when they are not here to defend themselves.
Mr. Osei-Prempeh 1 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am surprised at this objection. Perhap, it is a point of argument that he is making. Mr. Speaker, what I said was that all companies that have come in did not come in just to explore for the fun of it. They come in to work with the hope of striking oil from which they may benefit. Companies do not come in and say that they are just coming to explore and go away; they come in with an aim and when they come in they make investments. If they make investments, the money, the returns they may get, are what may come out of that. If nothing comes out of that, Mr. Speaker, they do not gain. I am saying that in this particular case, we all know that some work has been done there. So why are we not having oil? Why is Ghana not producing oil now? We are not reaching that stage and these people are coming

here to put in as much as $20 million. Mr. Speaker, if at the end of the day they are unable to reach a standard where Ghana can produce oil, nobody returns their investments to them.

So Mr. Speaker, what I am saying is that apart from getting that, apart from GNPC's two and a-half per cent, I will refer hon. Members to page 6 of the Report. Page 6 - General Terms. Royalties, if it is oil, we will get 5 per cent; if it is gas, it is 3 per cent; GNPC's carried interest - 12.5 per cent; GNPC's additional interest 10 per cent; gas - 10 per cent, our petroleum income tax - 36 per cent.

Mr. Speaker, it means that we stand to gain a lot. They are coming to invest their money. As at this stage, we are not going to put in our money so we need to encourage them so that when they are able to strike the oil, we get the benefits. Mr. Speaker, if we have oil underground, lying under the sea, we are not richer by it; it does not give us any money. It is only when we make sacrifices as we are doing for people to come and mine it, and it becomes oil that we stand to benefit from it. So that in the absence of any better arrangement, anybody coming out with a better arrangement if anybody it says that we should tell the people to go away and allow our oil to lie under the ground idle when it could be mined for the benefit of this country, I beg to disagree.

I have looked at the contract, the arrangement; I have looked at the Report, Mr. Speaker, and I believe that even though it may not be wholly acceptable it is the best for this country. It will be wrong for us to say that we should ignore it and send the people away while the potentials lie untapped. So Mr. Speaker, I urge all hon. Members to rise above this in the nation's interest, and support this motion.

Alhaji A. B. Sorogho (NDC -

Abokobi-Madina): Mr. Speaker, I am a little surprised that out of for Agreements, we have already considered two. And Mr. Speaker, we all agreed and without doubt we supported and we ratified them. Mr. Speaker, if we are talking, it is because there is something in this particular one which we are saying will not be in the best interest of Ghanaians.

It is simple. If my hon. Brothers and Sisters on the other side deem it fit that no, notwithstanding whatever is in the Committee's Report, we should go ahead and pass it, we want to say that we will not be a party to that.

Mr. Speaker, now we are all aware that we are using 70 per cent; we have only 30 per cent hydro and 70 per cent thermal. At our last meeting we were informed by the technical men that Ghana is now using 30 per cent hydro; the remaining 70 per cent is thermal, which is also gas-related.

Mr. Speaker, I want to say that if you read the Committee's Report, you will realize that the Committee itself is saying that it is not satisfied with the work of GNPC. Mr. Speaker, it is stated in black and white and has been echoed several times that the Committee is of the view that considering the enormous expenditure incurred in bringing up those areas -- investment in existing discoveries -- GNPC should have negotiated for a better deal. And we are saying that there is a way by which we can negotiate for a better deal. So out of the four, let us go back to the company and say that please, for this one, we want a better deal.
Mrs. G. E. Kusi 1 p.m.
On a point of order. Mr. Speaker, we had this discussion at the
Committee on Friday. But yesterday, the Committee met, the hon. Member was absent. His Ranking Member was there, other Members from the other side were there. The GNPC technical man explained everything and we all agreed and accepted. So this is why the Committee has this Report. [Interruptions] Mr. Speaker, it is the Committee's decision. It was explained and they did not attend. All those there did not attend. -- [Interruptions.]
Mr. Speaker 1 p.m.
Order!
Mrs. Kusi 1 p.m.
So Mr. Speaker, he is misleading this House. The Committee agreed that this was what we had to do and we accepted because we were convinced that - [Interruptions] - Please, we were convinced that this is the order and we agreed.
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, we deferred laying this document sometime ago for the Committee to meet again. . Happily, I was at the meeting yesterday, even though I left them somewhere along the line. And I got the impression that the Committee had looked at the matter and they were fully satisfied with the explanation. Perhaps, we can allow the Minister to clarify this single point for us to see whether there is the need for us to ask the Committee to look at it again, so that we make progress because the same point that was raised yesterday at the meeting, which I am told was satisfactorily explained to those who were there, is what is being raised now. Therefore, if we can allow the Minister to clarify that point and then after that we can continue with the debate, when there is that understanding - [Interruptions.] Please, it is not a question that he will have his chance. Mr. Speaker, he is a Member of the Committee and being a Member of the Committee he is now undermining the
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Order! Order! Hon. Members, I would at this stage stand this down. If it is possible for us to have further discussions on this matter, let us have it. I want to stand it down.
Mr. Adjaho 1:10 p.m.
Very well, Mr. Speaker, we will take the cue from you. You can stand it down, we do not have any objection.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Yes, members of the Committee can go out and discuss this matter further.
Hon. Members, let us move on to Item 14 - Chairman of the Committee.
Suspension of Order 80 (1)
Chairman of the Committee (Mrs. Gifty E. Kusi) 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, that notwithstanding the provisions of Standing Order 80(1) which require that no motion shall be debated until at least forty-eight hours have elapsed between the date on which notice of the motion is given and the date on which the motion is moved, the motion for the adoption of the Report of the Committee on Mines and Energy on the Petroleum Agreement amongst the Republic of Ghana, Ghana National Petroleum (GNPC) and Gasop Oil (Ghana) Limited (GOGL) in respect of Block Offshore Saltpond Basin, Ghana may be moved today.
Mr. Edward N. Ennin 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to second the motion.
Question put and motion agreed to.
Chairman of the Committee (Mrs. Gifty E. Kusi) 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, that this honourable Hosue adopts the Report of the Committee on Mines and Energy on the Petroleum Agreement amongst the Republic of Ghana, Ghana National Petroleum (GNPC) and Gasop Oil (Ghana) Limited (GOGL) in respect of Block Offshsore Saltpond Basin, Ghana.
And in so doing, I present the Report of the Committee.
1.0 Introdution
The Petroleum Agreement was laid before the House on Thursday 16th March 2006 by the hon. Minister for Public Sector Reform, hon. (Dr) Paa Kwesi Nduom, on behalf of the Hon. Minister for Energy and was subsequently referred to the Committee on Mines and Energy for consideration and reports in accordance with Article 103 (3) of the Constitution and Standing Orders No. 188 of the House. 2.0 Reference Document
The Committee made reference to the following documents in the course of its deliberations :
i. The 1992 Republican Constitution
ii. Standing Orders of Parliament
iii. PNDCL 64 of 1983
iv. The Petroleum (Exploration and Production) Law 1984
(PNDCL 84)
3.0 Purpose
Hon. Members are invited to consider and ratify the Petroleum Agreement negotiated among the Government of Ghana, the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC), and Gasop Oil (Ghana) Limited for the conduct of Petroleum Exploration and Production Operations in the Offshore, shallow water Saltpond Basin.
4.0 Background Information
The Agreement was negotiated within the framework of the Petroleum (Exploration and Production) Law 1984, PNDC Law 84, and the Model Petroleum Agreement, which has served as the main guide for several Petroleum Agreements that have been signed with companies interested in undertaking Petroleum Exploration and Production Operations in Ghana. The acreage applied for, is offshore shallow water and covers an area of approximately 2050 sq km.
Gasop Oil Ghana Limited (Gasop) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Omega Maritime and Energy Limited and an affiliate of Gasop Nigeria Limited with Zarubezhneft (Nestro) of Russia as a technical partner.
5.0 Terms of Agreement
a. Work Programme
Under the terms of the Agreement, Gasop, in association with GNPC, will undertake the programme of exploration in the designated area. Gasop will be responsible for 100% of the investments. GNPC will have 10 per cent Carried Interest and Gasop will have a 90 per cent equity interest.
The exploration period consists of a total of seven (7) years, and is divided into an initial period of two and half (21/2) years (the “Initial Exploration Period”); a first extension period of two and half (21/2) years (the “First Extension Period”); and a second extension period of two (2) years (the “Second Extension Period”).
The Contractor's Work Programme and minimum financial obligation are as follows:
Initial Exploration Period
Acquire, process and interpret a minimum of one thousand (1000) square kilometers of 3D seismic data;
Reprocess 600km of existing 2D seismic data; and
Drill one (1) Exploration Well to a minimum, depth of 3,700 metres or trill the Takoradi sands are penetrated, whichever occurs first.
The expenditure for the work in the Initial Exploration Period is Thirteen Million United States Dollars (USD
$13,000,000.00)
First Extension Period
Acquire, process and interpret a minimum, of 600 square kilometres 3D seismic data; and
Drill one (1) Exploration Well to a depth and at a location to be determined by the Joint Management committee (JMC).
The expenditure for the work in the First Extension Period is Nine Million United States Dollars (USD$9,000,000.00)
Second Extension Period
ROR 1:10 p.m.

AOE 1:10 p.m.

rose
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Deputy Minority Leader, do you have any problem with this?
Mr. E. K. D. Adjaho 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am a bit surprised at the kind of attitude that we are adopting towards this Agreement. We know we approved a lot of agreements on unanimous basis, without dissent. But Mr. Speaker, this particular Report, my attention has just been drawn to it; I thought it was a different one she was moving. It was laid last year before we went on recess and was slated when we came back for the decision to be taken by the Committee. Yesterday, it was true that the Committee met but if you look at the notice that was advertised they did not put this thing on the agenda. We have a problem with it and so last Meeting we could not take it. I do not know when they decided to go and take it -- why they took it and now they are suspending Standing Orders. We raised certain concerns and we agreed that we should meet for these concerns to be addressed.
Mr. Speaker, I am a Member of your Committee and we all agreed that we should look at it again. And if they were going to look at it yesterday, at least, they should have put it on the Notice Paper that we were going to look at this Agreement.
It was not advertised for yesterday, and now they are saying they met yesterday; and they are suspending Standing Orders. There was no need even to do so. This Agreement was laid as far back as last Meeting but we had a problem with it and so we did not take any decision on it.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Deputy Minority Leader, there is a problem with it, is there not?
Mr. Adjaho 1:10 p.m.
That is so.
Mr. Adjaho 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, there was a problem with it -
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Do you want us to stand it down?
Mr. Adjaho 1:10 p.m.
Absolutely.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Alright, then there is no problem about that.
rose
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Deputy Minister, do you have any comment to make?
Mr. Hammond 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, yes on the point that the hon. Doe Adjaho just made.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
We are standing it down to allow for further discussions on this matter and then you can come back again.
Majority Leader, we want to move to Item 17. [Interruptions.] Order! Order!
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am told that the Finance Committee has finished their Report on the motion moved by the Minister for Finance and Economic Planning and that it is being bound; and since today we may have an extended Sitting, we can continue with the Consideration Stage whilst we distribute the Report of the Finance Committee and then take it later on.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Hon. Members, we now will move on to Item 18.
Mr. Adjaho 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, with the greatest respect, I do not have any problem with whether we take it today or tomorrow but we cannot take it now. Mr. Speaker, we are giving the Government over ¢4 trillion to spend and so we have to scrutinize the Committee's Report.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Deputy Minority Leader, we are moving on to Item 18.
Mr. Adjaho 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am sorry.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Item 18 - The Ghana Institute of Journalism Bill at the Consideration Stage.
BILLS - CONSIDERATION STAGE 1:10 p.m.

Chairman of the Committee (Mr. S. K. B. Manu) 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, that clause 13 paragraph (a) delete “Director” and insert “Rector”.
This is a consequential amendment. The same goes for (b). Where we have “Deputy Director” we should have “Deputy Rector”, also as aconsequential amendment.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
And then No. (ii), Clause 13. Chairman, it is also consequential amendment, is not?
Mr. Manu 1:10 p.m.
Yes, Sir. It is consequential - “Deputy Rector,” instead of ‘Deputy Director.”
Question put and amendment agreed to.
1. 20 p.m.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Hon. Member for Amenfi East, you have no amendment standing in your name?
Mr. J. B. Aidoo 1:10 p.m.
No, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, there has not been any advertised
amendment in my name, but I have a problem with clause 13 itself.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
Are you moving another amendment?
Mr. J. B. Aidoo 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, if I could bring out my worry. I think there should be an amendment to the rendition to read, “The Board shall consists of” instead of “The Board consists of.”
Mr. Manu 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I go by that. I even noted it here; “The Board shall consist of,” then the rest follows. So I, therefore, I move that the amendment proposed be accepted.
Question put and amendment agreed
to.
Clause 13 as amended ordered to stand part of the Bill
Clause 14 - Functions of the Board
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, that clause 14, sub-clause (1) line 1, after “shall” insert “subject to the approval of the Council”
Mr. Speaker, if you will recall, yesterday, we agreed that the Board will operate subject to the powers of the Council. It is in that vein that I beg to move for an amendment, that clause 14 (1), after “shall” insert “subject to the approval of the Council,” Such that clause 14 (1) will now read: “The Board shall subject to the approval of the Council” - The rest can then follow.
Mr. Manu 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I oppose the
amendment with the reason that I find the amendment to be superfluous.
Mr. Speaker 1:10 p.m.
But hon. Chairman, you will recall that yesterday, we had to approve the amendment in respect of one
of the clauses. So this appears to be a consequential one. Is that not it? Unless you hold a very strong view about that, it appears to be consequential.
Mr. Joseph Yieleh Chireh 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, if you look at the Board, really, we do not need to add that. This is because some of the functions that the Board is to carry out there do not need to have the approval of the Council, if you look at the items. This is because anything that the Board does, apart from the awards, anything they do, they have the right to do those things. But whether those things can now be effective is another matter. So I think that really we should not add that phrase again.
Mr. Mahama Ayariga 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I believe that this amendment is consistent with the amendments that we have already made which seek to make the Council responsible for the supervision of the work of the Board. We do agree that the Board will be responsible for the day-to-day execution of the policies and programmes of the Institute. But we require the approval of the Council for many of the things that the Board will be required to do.
Mr. Speaker, if you look at the functions set out under clause 14 (1), they are very important ones. The criterion for admission of students, matters relating to the award of scholarship at the Institute, the content of curricula, the academic standards and validation and review of courses and et cetera are all indeed, at the core of the academic programme that is, what makes the Institute what it should be. And concerning those matters we hope that the rich character of the Council will be brought to bear on the quality of the output of whatever the Institute is supposed to produce. So if we limit it to only the Board without the Council having an opportunity to make an input into the content et cetera of whatever is going to
Mr. Mahama Ayariga 1:10 p.m.


happen in the Institute, then we will have a serious problem.

So Mr. Speaker, it is important that we amend this clause so that the Board will set out these things and seek approval from the Council. And when the Council is satisfied with the content and everything, it can give approval for these to take place. Mr. Speaker, this is just consistent with all that we have done so far in relation to empowering the Council, in relation to the Board. So I support the amendment and I urge hon. Members to support the amendment.
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I believe that if one should extrapolate the motive underpinning the amendment, then perhaps one may have to add, not only should one say that, whatever decision or action that the Board take should be subject to the powers of the Council. But one should also go further to say that, it should also be subject to the approval of the National Accreditation Board (NAB) and the National Council for Tertiary Education (NCTE). Mr. Speaker, because if you look at the functions of the Council, as per (2), it says “the Council shall in performance of its functions”… the operative word is “shall” “consult and collaborate with the National Accreditation Board (NAB) and the National Council for Tertiary Education (NCTE).” Mr. Speaker, so by extension, one could import that to say that the Board also needs the collaboration and consultation with the National Accreditation Board (NAB) and the National Council for Tertiary Education (NCTE).
Mr. Speaker, the principle under- pinning what they are espousing seems to be all right, except I believe, as argued by the hon. Chairman of the Committee, it appears superfluous in the context of its application. So I think that it is not really
necessary to include that. This is because if one should extend the reasoning, then perhaps we should even include the National Accreditation Board (NAB) and the National Council for Tertiary Education (NCTE). Mr. Speaker, and within the ambit of the operation of this Act, it is also subject to the Constitution, anyway. So would one then have to import the fact that it should also be within the context of the Constitution?
Mr. Speaker, I believe it is superfluous and it should be left as such.
Mr. Chireh 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, the point I am making is that we are talking about an academic institution or a professional body where we have a Council, which has functions, and as we all agree, the Board is certainly under the Council. So anything that the Board does, they cannot implement that by themselves. But the point I am making is that, if you look at all the legislations that we have made, we always have a Board and Council and a level of things. But you do not always say, “It is subject to the powers.” No. It is obvious. And I am saying that if, for instance, the Board is to determine the criterion for the admission of students, it is subject to the approval of the Council.
There are functions here, which as a Board, they should be given the freedom to decide on. If they carry out anything else that is conflicting with the functions that we have given to the Council, fine. But I think that this provision is really absolutely unnecessarily. In fact, it means that anytime the Board wants to determine anything, they have to go to the Council. No, they have to determine that and give it to the Council and if the Council approves it, that is it. In any case, they are supposed to also have statutes of the Institute and if statues are there This is an academic institution, it is not like a commercial corporate body.
So please, I think that we should avoid making it subject to the powers of the Council.
Mr. Kwadwo Adjei-Darko 1:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, it looks as if what the amendment is trying to do is making us become overcautious. This is because the Board will not operate in isolation. But if we are not careful we are also going to tie the hands of the Board so that for simple academic matters, they will have to wait for Council meetings -- and the Council meets at least once in three months.
Mr. Speaker, let us look at the functions of the Board Determining the content of curricula. This will definitely not be a function of the Council because the people who will even be on the Council may not have in-depth knowledge about the subject matter.
Then also, procedure for assessment, should it be directly under the Board or should the Board seek the mandate of the Council before they can do this?
So Mr. Speaker, I feel that what the hon. Member is trying to do will rather make the functions of the Board very difficult and therefore, I would want to oppose that amendment.
Alhaji Sumani Abukari 1:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, with the greatest respect to my hon. Colleague from Tamale South (Mr. Haruna Iddrisu) I would humbly advise that he should withdraw his amendment. Mr. Speaker, the Board of the academic institution would be responsible, as the hon. Minister of State has just said, for the day-to-day running of the school. That is why if you look at the composition of the Board, it is made up of the academicians.
The Council on the other hand is not necessarily made up of academicians, so the academicians should be allowed to determine policy matters as far as academic issues are concerned.
I think it is obvious from the functions of the Council that the Board would be under the Council, but the Council should not be seen to be interfering with academic issues that the Board would be determining from time to time as is necessary.
I think that it is superfluous to say that they should be under the Council because they are already under the Council, but the Council because, most of the members are not academicians should not be seen to be interfering with academic issues of the institute. Otherwise, they would be watering down the academic affairs of the institute. I would humbly advise my hon. Friend from Tamale South to withdraw this amendment. I think it is superfluous.
Mr. Speaker 1:30 p.m.
Hon. Member for Tamale South, have you reflected over this matter?
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu 1:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, with the extreme difficulty I think that for us to make progress and by your indulgence and leave, I withdraw the amendment.
(Amendment by leave withdrawn)
Mr. Speaker 1:30 p.m.
All right, thank you very much.
Mr. Manu 1:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, that clause 14 subclause (1) paragraph (e), line 2, delete all the words after “students”, so that the sentence would read “the Board shall determine the policy and procedure for the assessment and examination of students.”
Mr. Chireh 1:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, what the Committee discussed and agreed on was that after the word “students”, there should be a full stop and another paragraph which should start with “Determine” That was what I remember the Committee decided. It is not that all should be deleted; no. It should start with another paragraph which states “Determine the award of degrees, diplomas, certificates and other qualifications;”
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I tend to share the espousal of my Colleague hon. Yieleh Chireh because indeed if one breaks that construction into two - [Interruption.]
Mr. Manu 1:30 p.m.
Please, what they are talking about has been done, if they could only wait -- [Interruption.]
Mr. Speaker 1:30 p.m.
I have not called you Chairman, let us hear from him first.
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I realize that they have taken care of it in (vi) but I have an issue with the Committee. Unfortunately I was not at the winnowing and so I am not too sure if it had been taken into account. But Mr. Speaker, the point I am raising here is that we are told even with that amendment being proposed that--
“The Boa rd i s empowered to determine the policy and procedur”…
And Mr. Speaker, that is where my beef is because if one comes to consider the functions of the Council, Clause 5 (1) (a) reads (1), “The Council shall: (a) manage and initiate policies.”… It is the responsibility of the Council to initiate policies. Now, we are being told that the Board is also going to determine the
policies and I am a bit confused about the confusion there. Could the Chairman address it?
Mr. Manu 1:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to inform my Whip that they are not to determine policy on anything, they are to determine policy on specific issues; one is the assessment and examination of students and also the award of degrees, diplomas, certificates and other qualifications. These are the policies that the Board would determine and the Council would determine broad policies for the Institute.
Mr. Speaker 1:30 p.m.
Chairman of the Committee, let us tackle the matter in issue first;… delete all the words after “students”, The continuation of that is the matter at issue.
Mr. Manu 1:30 p.m.
Yes, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, after we have deleted all those words after students then we come down and add a new clause as follows:
“determine the policy and procedure for the:
(i) assessment and examination of
students, and
(ii) award of degrees, diplomas, certificates and other qualifica- tions.”
Mr. Speaker 1:30 p.m.
Chairman of the Committee, we later on realized that there was also a further amendment at the bottom. Do you not see that?
Mr. Manu 1:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, that is the amendment I am talking about -- [Interruption.]
Mr. Speaker 1:30 p.m.
But not at this stage. Let us get this done, (iv) delete all the words after students. Are you agreeable to that?
Mr. Manu 1:30 p.m.
Yes, Sir.
Mr. Adjei-Darko 1:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am a member of the Committee, and the way it has been put there seems to create some sort of confusion. The Committee was of the view that the rendition was a bit clumsy and so we should separate the two issues and make it clear, so that that amendment ((iv) should not have read “delete all the words after”... We were deleting the whole thing and then substituting it with (vi) that should be the amendment, so that we were deleting the whole of paragraph (e) and then re-writing it as it appears at (vi). That was the decision of the Committee.
Mr. Mahama Ayariga 1:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think the hon. Deputy Minister's proposal makes sense. Mr. Speaker, I think that, that is the way to proceed in relation to that clause. Mr. Speaker, I do not know whether you are indulging us to go ahead and do that, to delete the entire (e) and insert the proposal under (vi) so that we can go to the substance of (vi).
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
If you do so then we do not have the word ‘students' at all. After the word ‘students', what do we do?
Mr. M. Ayariga 1:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, the point is that if we were to take that amendment and subsequently take (vi), it does not make sense. So the intention of the Committee is that the entire clause should be deleted. If you look at (vi), it is an attempt to reorganise sub-clause (e) so that it captures the intent of the reorganisation. So the best approach is to delete (e) entirely and then go to (vi) and reorganise (e).
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
All right. In other words, you are abandoning this (iv), are you?
Mr. Manu 1:40 p.m.
Yes, I do agree; after a closer look, I find that (iv) will have to go so that we break the sentence into the new
clause as provided.
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
All right, so you are abandoning (iv).
Mr. Manu 1:40 p.m.
Yes, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
It is not entirely correct, is it?
Mr. Manu 1:40 p.m.
Yes.
Alhaji Abukari 1:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, in effect, what we are saying is that we are going to abandon (iv), (v) and delete 14 (e) and substitute it with (vi). So (e) is going, (iv) and (v) are gone and we substitute them with (vi). In effect, that is what we are asking for.
Mr. Manu 1:40 p.m.
No. Mr. Speaker.
Alhaji Abukari 1:40 p.m.
Yes.
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
That is not so?
Mr. Manu 1:40 p.m.
That is not so. What we are doing is this, we are deleting (e) and breaking it into two; it is only (e) we are taking out and breaking it into two as provided in (vi).
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
Chairman, first you are abandoning your amendment in respect of (iv), let us agree to that.
Mr. Manu 1:40 p.m.
Yes, that has been abandoned.
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
Before then, hon. Member for Bawku Central, what do you say to that?
Mr. Ayariga 1:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, what we are doing is further amending (iv) so that it will be a deletion of (e). So (iv), instead of saying that we should delete all words after “students”, we are now saying delete the entire clause. That is what we are
Mr. Ayariga 1:40 p.m.


saying now. So we are not abandoning it completely; we are further amending (iv) to delete - [Interruption] - Yes, so that when we delete we will now go to (vi) and do what we want to do.
Mr. Manu 1:40 p.m.
When you delete, you abandon.
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
Chairman, let us put it this way, we are deleting this (iv) and substituting it with this (vi).
Mr. Manu 1:40 p.m.
Exactly so.
Mr. Ayariga 1:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, there is a problem of reorganisation and also a problem with the substance of (vi). Hon. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu did raise issues which I support -- that if you look at (vi), what it seeks to do is to invest the Board with certain policy-making powers in relation to examination et cetera. But we have already conferred the power to initiate policies on the Council, and it seems that there is going to be a conflict here; because essentially the university is about setting academic standards, organising examinations and awarding degrees.
That is the substance of the work of a university. So if we have already invested another structure in the university, that is, the Council with the power to initiate policies and we now set out this area and say that the Board should have the power to initiate policies, there is going to be a very serious conflict and I think that we need to look at that closely before we go ahead to approve the amendment.
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
Hon. Member for Bawku Central, this policy here is specific, the other one is general; so I am sure we will not have any problem with that. There
may not be any problem, this one is very specific. Let us go on with (v), clause 14. Hon. Member for Tamale South, you may wish to move it. There is another amendment, hon. Member; clause 14, there is an amendment standing in your name.
Mr. Ayariga 1:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think it is consequential that if we are deleting (e) then we delete that one also.
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
That is out. (vii) - clause 14. Hon. Member for Tamale South, is he also abandoning that?
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think the Chairman has already dropped item (iv), so I thought you will go to (vi) to enable us to take the vote on it. I do not know whether the vote has already been taken.
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
We have done that.
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:40 p.m.
The vote has already been taken?
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
Yes.
Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu: All right.
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
Clause 14, there is an amendment; hon. Member for Bawku Central, is it being abandoned?
Mr. Ayariga 1:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, clause 14 subclause (2), line 3, delete all the words after “statutes”
Mr. Speaker, the rendition will now
be -
“Without limiting sub-section (1), the Board shall advise the Council generally and in particular on academic matters of the Institute and shall perform other function
conferred on it by statute of the Institute that the Council refers to it”.
So the proposal is that it should stop at “statutes of Institute” -- that the Council refers to it -- Mr. Speaker, it is a very confusing rendition and I think it will make more sense if we just stop at “statutes of the Institute.”
Mr. Adjei-Darko 1:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think the amended amendment - Originally, he was going to stop at ‘statutes' and I was going to oppose that. But as amended now, I think it is clear because we are now referring to the “statutes of the Institute.” So I think it is - [Interruption.]
Mr. Speaker 1:40 p.m.
So we should include ‘of the Institute'.
Mr. Adjei-Darko 1:40 p.m.
Exactly so.
Mr. Ayariga 1:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, yes. “statute of the institute.” Mr. Speaker, I further amend it to read, “by statute of the Institute,” not “statutes of the institute”. Usually, the universities have a statute so instead of statutes of the institute” we should have “statute of the institute”, -- without the “s”.
Mr. Speaker 1:50 p.m.
I thought the university was always using the word “statutes.” They use the plural not the singular.
Mr. Ayariga 1:50 p.m.
Very well, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Manu 1:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to differ from the amendment being proposed. What the clause is saying is that it is the “statutes” of the institute that the Council will refer to the Board . So that Council will refer to it. The it there refers to the Board, that the Council will refer those
statutes to the Board.
Mr. Speaker 1:50 p.m.
Chairman of the Committee, are you opposing the amendment?
Mr. Manu 1:50 p.m.
Mr. speaker, I therefore oppose the amendment.
Mr. Yieleh Chireh 1:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker,
the point is that we should stop at the “statutes of the institute” because they are like the bye-laws that will be made within the institute itself. So you do not need a Council to refer it to them. They are guided by the statutes that the institute itself has, so the Council does not need to refer it to them. So it should stop at “the institute” and I think that he should support the motion.
Mr. Alhaji Abukari 1:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think for the first time I will agree with the hon. Member for Wa West . Mr. Speaker, I think that it will be superfluous here again to say that it is the Council that is going to refer. All those statutes that we made for the university will be made under the authority of the Council. So if there are any functions that should be referred to the Board it will be functions which will be referred under the statutes of the Council to the Board. So to again add that it should be made by the Council is superfluous. I think that we should stop at “statutes of the institute”. That is correct.
Mr. Speaker 1:50 p.m.
Hon. Members, we shall have extended Sitting.
Mr. Manu 1:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, with the explanation given, I concede.
Mr. Speaker 1:50 p.m.
So, the question is that we should stop at the Institute, is that not it? Chairman, we should stop after “the institute”.
Mr. Manu 1:50 p.m.
Yes, “statutes of the institute”. we stop after “institute”.
Mr. Ayariga 1:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, that clause 15 subclause (1) line 2, we delete “to those committees functions to be determined” and substitute “ responsibilities to those committees” Mr. Speaker, if we do that the rendition will now be, “the Board may for the performance of its functions appoint committees and assign responsibilities to those committees” instead of “assign to those committees functions to be determined”. Mr. Speaker, I believe that it will be a better rendition to say that the Board may in the performance of its functions appoint committees and assign responsibilities to those committees.
Mr. Speaker 1:50 p.m.
Chairman of the Committee, yes?
Mr. Manu 1:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, for once I think I will go by the amendment.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Clause 15 as amended ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clause 16 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clause 17 - Regulatons of the Board.
Mr. Speaker 1:50 p.m.
Hon. Member, yes, there is an amendment in your name.
Mr. Ayariga 1:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, we are proposing that the entire clause 17 should be deleted. Clause 17 proposes that the Board may make regulations to provide for matters relating to its responsibilities
and any other matter that falls within its powers. Mr. Speaker, first of all, usually the activities of the Board and the university generally are regulated in the statutes of the university or the institute. Secondly, if we go to clause 32 which deals with regulations generally, the Minister may on the advice of the Council and by legislative instrument make regulations for the implementation of the provisions of this Act .
So clearly, you already have the statutes of the institute which set out clear regulations on what should take place, and secondly, where regulations are needed to implement this particular statute, the Minister should be the one with the powers to make those regulations. So to now vest the Board with powers also to make regulations - Mr. Speaker, will be giving too much powers to the Board. It is in that respect that we propose that the entire clause 17 should be deleted so that the Board does not have the powers to make regulations.
Mr. Adjei-Darko 1:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, before I comment on it, he always introduces the amendment by saying “we propose,” but on the Order Paper it is only one person proposing it. So, if he is standing in for the proposer he should make it clear. Mr. Speaker, if you look at the rendition it says “the Board may” Then secondly, let us look at the functions of the Board. We are talking about assessment, examination and curriculum determination. Definitely, even for specific examinations and sometimes even from faculty or department to department, selection of candidates -- even it happens in the universities -- The cut off point may vary from department to department and so on.
So all these are internal matters which from time to time or even on yearly basis may have to be revised by the Board so that they can function according to the
functions which have been assigned them by the Bill or the Act. So I think by taking it out completely and hoping that in all these matters we would expect a Minister to make regulations -- Perhaps, it depends on the definition of regulations, the way we are seeing it, but if we are looking at the functions of the Board and we see that it is on daily basis then this is important and we do not have to take it off.
Alhaji Abukari 2 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think that again I agree with the hon. Minister. I will cite an example. If you take the Labour Act, the Labour Commission has regulations governing their activities as a Commission and then the Minister would also come out with regulations governing the entire labour body of the country. So these are not contradictory. The University Board can have regulations governing the activities of the Board, and the Minister would come out with regulations governing the entire system. I think there is nothing contradictory about it and we should leave clause 17 to stand.
Mr. Mahama Ayariga 2 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would want to agree with them if they were talking more in terms of the internal procedures of the Board. But this clause goes beyond the internal procedures of the Board. It is all right for us to say that a Board may regulate its internal procedures, but this clause says that it should regulate matters relating to its responsibilities and any other matter that falls within its powers -- [Interruption.] No, there is a difference - This is because its powers are very extensive in this particular Bill and its responsibilities are also very extensive in this particular Bill.
And for us to say that it shall make regulations that cover everything that
it does, not just internal administrative procedures, for me, is dangerous. This is because it will leave the Minister with no other work to do and the opportunity that this House has to scrutinize such regulations would be lost. Under the cover of this particular clause any other thing regarding this particular Bill could be the subject of regulation by the Board without Parliament having an opportunity to take a look at it.
Mr. Osafo-Maafo 2 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think we must distinguish between the internal and the external workings of the Board. If you take the accounting function we have external auditor and internal auditor, one reinforces the other. Now every Board must have internal rules and regulations which are guidelines for the operations of the Board internally and I think this clause must be there to provide that ambit. If we talk about the ministerial regulations, we are talking about other regulations that govern its external operations and that may be even inter-university relations et cetera. But the internal one we need to leave this clause to give the Board that freedom to operate and that will vary from time to time. I was very happy with the hon. Minister who spoke earlier on. This will not be constant; from time to time we would value these regulations. So I think that the clause is not superfluous, let it be there.
rose
Mr. Speaker 2 p.m.
Do you want to withdraw it?
Mr. Ayariga 2 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I just want to amend clause 17 so that the Board may make regulations Mr. Speaker, what I want to capture is that the Board may make regulations for its internal procedures. For me, something like that will be more acceptable.
Mr. Speaker 2 p.m.
Yes, hon. Member for Bawku Central, but it talks about “that falls within its power,” does it not? Are you not satisfied with that?
Mr. Ayariga 2 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, that falls within its powers and etc. -- [Interruptions.] Mr. Speaker, you see, we want to give them powers to regulate procedure -- not the substance of the power itself, but the procedure in the exercise of the power. Mr. Speaker, the original proposer of the amendment says we should withdraw so with your leave we withdraw.
Clause 18 - Faculties of the Institute
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu 2 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I
beg to move that, clause 18 subclause (2), line 3, delete “efficient performance of the functions of the Institute” and substitute “academic work”.
Mr. Speaker, all the issues we are discussing border on the work of the academic board and I think that we could narrow it to academic work instead of a broader sentence like “efficient performance of the functions of the Institute.”
Mr. S. K. B. Manu 2 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I oppose the amendment because all the work that they do will not be academic. There are some activities that the University or the Institute would do that are not academic. For instance, disciplining students is not academic. It promotes academic work but it is not academic by itself. So if that is his argument then it is flawed and therefore should not be admitted.
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, the Institute is supposed to work via the faculties. Indeed, the functions of the Institute have been spelt out in clause 3. Mr. Speaker, clause 3 (c) indicates, “provide for the general
welfare, recreational and social needs of the students and staff of the Institute.” Clearly, these are not strict academic work and the faculties are supposed to be partners in this. Mr. Speaker, so it is not exactly correct to say that they are established solely for academic work. There are some other matters that may not fit into strict academic pursuit - social, general welfare, recreational and social needs of the students and staff of the Institute are also required to be part of the functions of the Institute. Mr. Speaker, for that reason, I believe that the amendment is not necessary.
Mr. Mahama Ayariga 2 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, if you look at clause 18(2) carefully it talks about the creation of a faculty. You do not create a faculty to deal with the welfare of students, you do not create a faculty to address recreational issues. Anytime you create a faculty it is to pursue an academic programme. Indeed, that is why “the Academic Board” is mentioned in that subclause - that the Council may on the advice of the Academic Board. The Academic Board has at least a very narrow focus which is academic matters. And so when the Academic Board is making recommendations it will not be about recreational matters, it will be about academic issues.
Those of you who have lectured at universities and so on before know that faculties relate to academic issues. If you want to create a centre to pursue some issue in the university, fine. If you want to create a department to deal with an issue, fine. But each time that you are creating a faculty it is definitely about an academic matter. And the functions stated in clause 3 (b) or (c ) is immaterial in relation to these arguments. So we think that the amendment should stand and I urge hon. Members to support it. Otherwise, when academics see this they would find the work very ridiculous.
Mr. J. Y. Chireh 2 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think that they should withdraw the amendment. This is because, if you look at the qualifier here in this provision it says, “the Council may on the advice of the Academic Board create in the Institute any other faculty with specified courses of study as it considers necessary for the efficient performance of the Institute.”
And so this limitation, if it was qualifying the Academic Board, yes; but if you look at it, it is not; it is now coming to the entire functions of the Institute and therefore it will be more inclusive to have it as it is now rather than limit it as if you are talking about - You see, the qualifier here, should be look at well, it is not referring to the Academic Board - “The performance of the Institute …”
On the recommendation - If you want to move the academic thing to immediately after the Board, yes, but if you do not then you are talking about the entire performance of the Institute and that one is more inclusive and we should not amend it at all.
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, further to what my hon.Colleague has said, even if you come to associate it with the Academic Board nothing in this Bill indicates to us that the Board shall concern itself strictly with academic matters. Mr. Speaker, the functions of the Board itself are set out in clause 14. And 14(2) says “Without limiting subsection (1), the Board shall advise the Council generally…” And then it goes on to say: “…shall perform other functions conferred on it by the statutes of the Institute…” So Mr. Speaker, even if you come to consider the functions of the Academic Board they are not restricted to the pursuit of academics alone. Mr. Speaker, for that reason I believe my hon. Colleague is
convinced, and not only convinced but persuaded that his amendment is really uncalled for.
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Hon. Member for Tamale South, do you intend to take a certain course on clause 18?
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to listen to further persuasive arguments and if I am convinced I may consider - But I still think that it is a worthy - [Interruption.]
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
I intend to put the Question, that is why I am asking you.
Mr. Iddrisu 2:10 p.m.
I think you can proceed, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Osafo-Maafo 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think I can convince my hon. Friend to step it down [Laughter.] Mr. Speaker, academic work is certainly the main function of the faculties. But the distractions in any faculty in all our tertiary institutions in Ghana today do not arise out of the academic work, but out of other social frictions. And therefore, you cannot have a situation where you restrict the work only to academic work. So the rendition that covers a wider area is preferred. Yes, their main job would be the academic work; I agree with him. But let us have the flexibility, so that if there is a friction that is disturbing academic work they can deal with it.
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, who am I, having listened to the persuasive arguments of the President-to-be, in the likely or unlikely event of… - [Laughter.]
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
The amendment is abandoned?
Mr. Iddrisu 2:10 p.m.
Yes, Mr. Speaker.
Question put and amendment negatived.
Mr. Iddrisu 2:10 p.m.


Clause 18 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Clauses 19 - 22 ordered to stand of the Bill.
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Hon. Members, maybe, at this stage we may wish to pause and then go to other items on the Order Paper. Hon. Members, we go to item 17 and we will call on the Chairman of the Committee on Finance - [Pause.]
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, with respect and with your indulgence, if we could make further progress and stand the particular motion down for a while, because I believe many people may want to contribute. The Ranking Member for instance, is not available and I believe this being a very important document, with respect to our hon. Colleagues, we could stand it down for some time and proceed with the Consideration Stage.
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Majority Chief Whip, I have already indicated that we should go on to other matters.
Mr. J. Y. Chireh 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I support the argument he has made. If you look at Standing Order No. 48, and particularly what we are dealing with, a financial matter, the numbers do not add up. The people who were part of the Committee are not here, so I would suggest that we at least go for lunch and maybe get refreshed to argue.
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Hon. Member for Wa West, it is not my intention to suspend Sitting. You know, as soon as we suspend Sitting that would be the end of the day, so we might as well go on.
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, with your indulgence, I believe that if you do an assessment of the Members in the Chamber you would be satisfied that an important issue such as a supplementary fiscal policy is worth the presence of more hon. Members of Parliament. In that regard, I think I support the hon. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu that we may consider even adjourning and then continue work tomorrow.
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
I do not think that was the point he raised. Majority Chief Whip, were you asking us to adjourn further proceedings?
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:10 p.m.
Not exactly so, Mr. Speaker. It was the consideration of that matter, the motion, and I thought we could rather proceed on the Consideration Stage of the Bill that is before us.
Mr. S. K. B. Manu 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I was going to move that since we are having problems with that item why do we not continue with the Consideration Stage of the Ghana Institute of Journalism Bill.
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Hon. Members, we may under such circumstances proceed with the Consideration Stage of the Ghana Institute of Journalism Bill.
Clause 23 - Director of the Institute.
2. 20 p. m.
Mr. S. K. B. Manu 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, before I move this particular amendment, I would like to move that the subheading - Director of the Institute be amended to read, Rector of the Institute. That is a consequential amendment flowing from what we did done earlier. Wherever the designation “Director” appears, consequentially it should be substituted with “Rector”.
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
That would be taken care of.
Mr. Manu 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move,
that clause 23 -- subclause (3) paragraph (a), after “staff” insert “and Students”
Mr. Speaker, this is to cover students
as well because we are saying that the Rector of the Institute would exercise general authority over the staff, and we are adding “and students” so that he would have full control over the constituents of the Institute.
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:10 p.m.
Mr.
Speaker, I support the amendment except that I believe in a hierarchical arrangement, “the students” should precede “staff'. It should be students and staff.
Mr. Ayariga 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would
like some further clarification from the mover of the amendment. Mr. Speaker, when you talk about exercise of authority, what exactly do you mean by the exercise of authority over students? I do not appreciate --
rose
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Hon. Chairman, you
only speak when you are called upon. Yes, have you finished your contribution?
Mr. Manu 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, when we say
the headmaster - let me bring him home to when he was in secondary school. When we say the headmaster of - I do not know which school he attended - exercises general authority over the students, it means they are under his authority. He has general control over them by virtue of his position as the head. It is like in this Chamber, where the hon. Speaker exercises general authority
over the House. So I am bringing it home to him. So in that sense, we say the Rector exercises general authority over either staff and students or depending on hon. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu's amendment, whether we shall take “students” before “staff” or “staff” before “students”.
Mr. Abdul-Rashid Pelpuo 2:10 p.m.
Mr.
Speaker, I am particularly at a loss why the change or the amendment from “Director” to “Rector”
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Hon. Member, we have
dealt with this matter a long time ago.
Mr. Pelpuo 2:10 p.m.
Yes, but I just want him to
explain it before the motion goes through.
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
You are out of order,
hon. Member.
Mr. Yieleh Chireh 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I
think that if you look at the functions of the Rector they include administrative functions. So I think it is natural that he is administering the whole institute with students there and so we cannot leave out the students. The SRC and the entire student body that are there must be subject to some authority, as we are saying. So it is really deriving from his function as an administrator and therefore the authority we are asking him to have over students and staff really is part of his functions as head but if you say that students should be outside the control or authority of the administrator, with whom then do they have any other relation.
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Hon. Member for Wa
West, are you therefore opposed to the amendment or you are for it?
Mr. Chireh 2:10 p.m.
I am for the amendment.
The Committee discussed it extensively and we thought that once students are within the academic system you cannot control only the staff. If there is a problem
Mr. Kwadwo Adjei-Darko 2:10 p.m.
Mr.
Speaker, if you look at subclause (2), I think it answers the question which was posed by the hon. Member for Bawku Central. It reads -- “The Director shall be the principal academic, administrative, and disciplinary officer of the Institute.” Therefore, all disciplinary matters within the Institute will come under the Director and the Institute does not comprise of only the academic staff. Even the non-teaching staff are part of it; the student body is part of it. You cannot be a disciplinary officer for the Institute when a section of it is not captured at all when it comes to disciplinary matters. So I think that we should go by the amendment as proposed by the Committee Chairman.
Mr. Mahama Ayariga 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker,
I am afraid that we are in the process of creating a very authoritarian system that might turn out to be very oppressive for students. Mr. Speaker, traditionally, it is the academic board that has been responsible for students, for their discipline, et cetera. For us to create an authoritarian figure, like the Director in that Institute and further vest him with the powers to be the principal disciplinary officer, I am afraid that we are creating a very dangerous system where we might end up having a very dictatorial and authoritarian Director who he would be backed by a statute.
I think that the best arrangement usually is to have an academic board that would be the one that would deal with issues of discipline, et cetera, regarding students. I can understand it if the Director is supposed to exercise authority over the staff, because the relationship between
the staff and the institute is a contractual one, and you want a hierarchy and you want somebody to be responsible; but in relation to the students, it is a completely different legal arrangement. So when you have the Director being the authority and in addition being the principal disciplinary officer for an institute at the level of the university, I think it is a very dangerous arrangement. We would rather have the Director exercise his authority over the staff and also to have the academic board be responsible for the discipline of students, not the Rector.
Mr. Manu 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I can understand why we are having problems in our institutions these days. If we have such thinking where the administrator of the school should not have control over students in the school, then we are likely to face the problems that we are facing in our institutions.
rose
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Hon. Member for Bawku
Central, you find it amusing yourself so resume your seat.
Mr. Ayariga 2:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, the hon.

Mr. Speaker, I think he ought to withdraw this. We know of institutions where the Director or Rector becomes so authoritarian that it becomes more or less like a concentration camp instead of an academic community; and I am simply asking that we make our academic institutions more liberal, and diffuse power in such a way that it is not vested in one person. He is the principal authoritative person; he is the disciplinary person, and I think it is not the best arrangement. I believe the more liberal our academic institutions are and the more students demand their freedom, the better we would have people who would graduate into the

class that would maintain our democracy.
rose
Mr. Speaker 2:10 p.m.
Let him finish hon.
Chairman. Hon. Member have you finished your contribution? [Hon. Member: Yes] Alright, if you have finished that is fine.
Alhaji Sumani Abukari 2:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker,
I think the hon. Member for Bawku Central's definition of the Director being the principal disciplinarian, Being in control of staff and all that is being restrictive. Mr. Speaker, I would read the whole thing again, maybe he did not look at it carefully. It says: “The Director shall be the principal academic, administrative, and disciplinary officer over the staff and students. If you are talking of staff and we are adding students, I think that he is restricting the definition of “principal authority”, that is clause 23(3) (a) - “The Director shall exercise general authority over the staff of the Institute”; and they are saying staff and students. That is general authority; he is the general overseer of the institute.

I do not think that that gives the Director the sole authority to discipline the staff and students. That does not exclude, to my mind, his referral of certain actions to the Board for the Board to assist in determining certain disciplinary actions that may be taken against staff or students. It does not necessarily preclude the Board.

To me that is inclusive of the Board. So if they say he is the principal, of course, in every organization there must be a head. And like he said, in every school, for instance in his school, there was a headmaster who was responsible for these things. I think that we should be careful that we do not create institutions where

there would be such indiscipline that if the Board does not get to convene its members in time, the students would take the law into their hands and there would be nobody to control the staff and the students in the institution.

Mr. Speaker, this amendment is rather very good; my hon. Friend's interpretation is misconceived. I think we should drop it.

Question put and amendment agreed to.
Mr. Manu 2:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to
move, that clause 23 -- subclause (3) paragraph (b) (ii), delete “advise” and substitute “advising”
Mr. Speaker, the reason is that if one
reads the rendition that the Rector of the institute shall exercise general authority over the staff and students, be responsible for the co-ordination - and one comes to (ii) and say “for advise” then one would be saying he would “be responsible for advise the Council” which is not good English. Rather, it should read, he would be responsible for advising…” So the word ‘advise' should rather be ‘advising' in order for it to be in tandem with the tense of the sentence.
Question put and amendment agreed
to.
Clause 23 as amended ordered to stand
part of the Bill.
Clause 24 to 26 ordered to stand part
of the Bill.
Clause 27 -- Funds of the Institute
Mr. Manu 2:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to
move, that clause 27 - subclause (1) paragraph (f), delete “from”
MR. SECOND DEPUTY SPEAKER
Mr. Speaker, the reason is that if “from” is there, the sentence would read 2:30 p.m.
“The funds and property of the Institute consists of…” then (‘f'” will be “from” and will read -- “consists of from.” So if “from” is dropped, then it would be “The funds and property of the Institute consist of any other source approved by the Council.” So it cannot be “of” and “from” following one another.
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, since the Chairman was talking about the correctness of the grammar, I thought he was going to start from clause 27(1) which says: “The funds and property of the Institute”. Mr. Speaker, it is a conjunct, “The funds and property of the Institute,” is not singular. It “May consists of”. The word should be “consist” and not “consists”. It is a conjunct.
Mr. Manu 2:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, even further
to that, I think it should be “The funds and property of the Institute shall consist of”.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:30 p.m.
And
you do not also want to say “properties”?
Mr. Manu 2:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, there are cases
where one can use “properties” in English. In Chemistry there is “properties.” “The funds and property of the Institute”; we may as well drop the ‘s' and take ‘consist of' if we do not want to bring in ‘shall'. It is for the consideration of the House, whether we retain ‘shall' or take it out.
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:30 p.m.
Mr.
Speaker, the drafters have in recent times been advising that the modern trend is to move away from the employment of ‘shall' under such circumstances. That is why they now delete ‘shall'. Once this Bill becomes an Act, we will no longer say ‘The funds and property of the Institute in this Act shall consist of”; it will be “will consist of'. So the modern trend is to move away from the use of the ‘shall' in such circumstances.
Mr. Kwadwo Adjei-Darko 2:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am a member of the Committee but I think there is something we should have considered. If one looks at the headnote, it is “Funds of the Institute”. If one looks at all the sub clauses which have been listed they are talking about only money. So why we introduce it as “Funds and Property” is where I have a problem; because from (a) to (f) it is all money. So, perhaps, I need some explanation.
Mr. J. B. Aidoo 2:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think that when you look at (d), (d) has “other moneys or property” and then also © talks about the sale of any property. But (d) is very specific that “other moneys or property”; so it means that the heading is capturing that aspect.
Mr. Manu 2:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, for the
reason given by hon. J.B. Aidoo, I think we should retain the heading because as rightly pointed out, (d) is saying “Other moneys or property lawfully received by the Institute for its purposes”; and as an institute they may receive property in the form of even a building. Somebody may donate a building to the institute and that would be property and not money. So I maintain that the rendition be as it is.
Question put and amendment agreed
to.
Clause 27 as amended ordered to stand
part of the Bill.
Clause 28 -- Accounts and audit
Mr. Manu 2:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to
move, that clause 28 -- subclause (1), line 1, delete “keep” and substitute “cause to be kept”
The clause is saying, “The Council shall keep books of account and proper records in relation to them in the form approved by the Auditor-General.” Mr. Speaker, the Council in practice does not keep records of books. They do not keep books of account but the Council causes to be kept those books by the Accountant. That is why we are proposing this amendment to reflect the reality on the ground.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Clause 28 as amended ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clause 29 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clause 30 -- Statutes of the Institute
Mr. Manu 2:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to
move, that clause 30 - subclause (2), add a new paragraph as follows:
“ensure discipline among senior members of staff”
Mr. Speaker, if you look at the clause it does not make room for ensuring discipline among members of staff, but it is a reality that sometimes some members of staff can actually be indisciplined and they should be disciplined. So we are adding it so that where a member of staff needs to be disciplined then the Director can have the -- the statutes of the Institute should include that so that members of staff in the Institute would be aware that if they go wrong they can be disciplined in the performance of their work.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Clause 30 as amended ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clauses 31 to 33 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clause 34 -- Interpretation
Mr. Manu 2:40 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, that clause 34 - line 3, delete “Director” and substitute “Rector”
Mr. Speaker, this is consequential.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Clause 34 as amended ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clause 35 -- Dissolution, repeal and savings
Mr. Manu 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, that clause 35 -- subclause (1), line 2, delete all the words after “Act”.
The rendition then will be: “The Ghana Institute of Journalism Decree, 1974 (NRCD 275) is repealed by this Act”; and drop all other words that follow.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
Clause 35 as amended ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Clause 36 ordered to stand part of the

Bill.

The Long Title --
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker,

I think that I am in agreement with the Chairman of the Committee that for the Long Title we should substitute “responsible for Education.” In this day and time that the name of the Ministry keeps changing, it is important that the Ghana Institute of Journalism, as a tertiary educational institution, is placed under the Ministry of Education. In order tertiary educational institution is placed under the Ministry of Education so as to do away with future doubts about the name, we think that it should be substituted for “Ministry responsible for Education.”

I, therefore, urge hon. Members to support it.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Does
it mean that you are dropping your amendment in favour of the one proposed by the hon. Chairman?
Mr. Iddrisu 2:50 p.m.
Yes, Mr. Speaker. They
have the same intention.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Hon.
Chairman of the Committee, please move your amendment.
Mr. Manu 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to
move that the Long Title, line 2, delete “of Education and Sports” and insert “responsible for Education”. Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. Member for Tamale South for finding it unnecessarily to propose that amendment and as such drop it for my amendment. I therefore urge hon. Members to vote massively for the amendment I proposed.
Question put and amendment agreed to.
The Long Title as amended ordered to
stand part of the Bill
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Hon. Majority Leader, any advice?
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, Leadership just had a quick meeting and we agreed that we can take the motion on the mini budget tomorrow, immediately after the State Burial of Professor Adu Boahen.
But for the moment, if we can take the two items on the petroleum that we stood down, and then we can handle the mini- budget tomorrow.
Mr. Speaker, before I sit down, maybe, I may need to draw the attention of my hon. Colleagues to the fact that tomorrow Parliament will sit at 11.30 a.m. instead of the normal 10:00 a.m. to allow as many of our hon. Colleagues as possible who would want to be at the Business Committee to do so. But the Business Committee will meet at 8:00 a.m. so that we can finish the business of the Committee before we go for the funeral.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Hon. Majority Leader, which items specifically were stepped down?
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, you may recall that we did not take the two Petroleum Agreements.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Very well. Then we shall take item 12.
MOTIONS 2:50 p.m.

Chairman of the Committee (Mrs. Gifty Eugenia Kusi) 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move that notwithstanding - [Interruptions.]
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.


Well, I understand that, that motion was moved before the matter was stood down. So we go to the substantive motion, number 12.
rose
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Let us hear the hon. Deputy Minority Leader.
Mr. Adjaho 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think that you are now back. I think the motion was moved and stood down.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
After it has been rectified, you do not need to spent energy again. We have acknowledged that.
You mean the main motion was moved?
Mr. Adjaho 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, the main motion was moved. The hon. Member for Abokobi-Madina was on his feet when the hon. Majority Leader raised an issue and Mr. Speaker ordered that it should be stood down so that we go and do consultation behind the scenes.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Well, was the Committee's Report presented?
Mr. Adjaho 2:50 p.m.
Yes, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Hon. Chairman of the Committee, did you present the Committee's Report to the House?
Mrs. Kusi 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I just finished presenting the Committee's Report and there was this point of order.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Very well. So it means that the motion having moved and after the presentation of the
Committee's Report, the matter it is now for the consideration of the House.
Mr. Mahama Ayariga 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, my recollection is that the matter was stood down so that the Committee would meet, because that was the objection that was raised to the motion being moved. Mr. Speaker, the Committee has not met. The leading members of the Minority side of the Committee are not even in the House. In fact, the hon. Member for Tamale South (hon. Iddrisu Haruna) is a member of the Committee and he can attest to the fact that the Committee has not met.
And indeed, for such an important matter, you need to serve notice of the committee meeting so that all hon. Members can be there. But under these circumstances, clearly, a proper meeting as weighty as this could not have reasonably been organized within the last two hours, especially when we were supposed to be on the floor of the House dealing with other equally important issues.
So Mr. Speaker, I think the ill has not been cured. So let us still stand down the matter until the Committee has properly met and then we can proceed on the matter.
Mr. Adjaho 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to put on record that there are two issues, which have been stood down; one dealing with what we call the Shallow Water and another one dealing with Gasop Oil. The item 12 was moved and the hon. Member for Abokobi-Madina was on his feet when the hon. Majority Leader intervened. That one too has been stood down and we have not concluded it. Then item 17 or so, the second item, was also stood down. So now that we have come back, I think that the hon. Member who was on his feet might conclude; or the Committee comes back if there is any understanding reached by Leadership then it is announced to the House and then we continue. Because, since the hon. Member for Abokobi- Madina was on his feet, it will only be
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 2:50 p.m.
Hon. Majority Leader, let us get advice on what was actually the state of affairs before the matter was stood down.
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 2:50 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, on item 12, I said that in the light of some issues that had been raised perhaps you might allow the hon. Minister to clarify those issues or we try to have consultation on them. I never said there was going to be a committee meeting; I said there should be a clarification. But it looked like when we had the interval there were some meetings here and there on the item 12. So I am thinking that possibly the hon. Deputy Ranking Member of the Committee who was part of the discussions behind the scenes may be able to tell us what is the current state.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3 p.m.
Hon. Member for Abokobi-Madina, you were on your feet and you should be seized with what development took place during the break.

Alhaji Amadu Sorogho (NDC -

Abokobi-Madina): Mr. Speaker, I am grateful that having stood the motion down we went out and the Deputy Minister explained some of the points. He met us and in fact not all of us because as we were out business was still going on and we needed one or two of our Members to still be in the Chamber to continue with normal business. But for those of us who went out, the Deputy Minister tried to explain. He explained the difficulties that he had to go through with his team in negotiating for the 12.5 per cent and he brought certain document to that effect.

The Deputy Minister also agreed that substantial amount of about $50 million

has already been invested into that area. The Deputy Minister also explained to us that the $50 million was not all invested in the well but the majority part of it was used for the gas pipeline and for that reason, the Deputy Minister urged us on that that was the best that the Committee can get as far as the carriage interest is concerned.
rose
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3 p.m.
Hon.
Member for Tamale South, do you have a point of order?
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu 3 p.m.
Rightly so,
Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the Standing Orders of this House create committees for Members of this House. I am not aware of any committee meeting narrowed to Leadership which is binding on the committee. I am a member of the committee, but I have not been served notice of any meeting, and I have not taken part in any meeting and therefore I am not bound by the conclusions reached.
Mr. Speaker, I am a principal party and I raised the objection. I cannot understand why you invest 50 million United States dollars and somebody comes to do an exploration for 20 or 10 million dollars and he has 100 per cent and you have 12.5 per cent, and you call a meeting and you do not involve us and you say Leadership - I
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3 p.m.
Hon.
Member for Tamale South, you are out of order. Hon. Member, the fact that you were not there does not mean a nullity of whatever meeting took place, especially when it involved was both sides. Chairman of the Committee, let us get some input from you, as the Chairman.
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 3 p.m.
Mr. Speaker,
since some hon. Colleagues are saying that they were not around when this clarification was given, I believe if we can ask the Deputy Minister to throw more light on some of the things that he indicated at that meeting. But let me repeat that we never said there was going to be a committee meeting; we said there was going to be a consultation so that people who have some reservations about the issue, it would be explained to them. In fact, that is what I stated when I said that the Deputy Minister may be allowed to speak. Now that the hon. Member has brought this thing up if we can allow the Deputy Minister to clarify the issue, perhaps we may make progress.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3 p.m.
I
have ruled the hon. Member out of order because if it is established that there was a meeting then just the fact that one member was not there does not nullify anything. So I wanted to hear from the Chairman; Chairman, you had consultation with them, did you not?
Chairman of the Committee(Mrs. G.E. Kusi) 3 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, as far as I am concerned, after it had been stood down we had to go and negotiate with the leadership of the Committee and then the
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3 p.m.
Very
well. Hon. Deputy Minister, for the benefit of all those who did not - although if you are absent from a meeting that is no guarantee for withdrawing, let us hear from you. That might help other Members who were not there to get the true picture.
Deputy Minister for Energy Mr. K.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3 p.m.
Order!
Order!
Mr. Hammond 3 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, the
rose
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3 p.m.
Do you have a point of order, hon. Member?
Mr. E. T. Mensah 3 p.m.
Yes, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, there is some confusion here. We were told that there was consultation whilst some Members were not present and the Chairman was just telling us that it was unanimously agreed. But the issue is that members of the Committee have raised objection to the issue on the floor so I would have thought that we would allow the Committee members to move out and go and discuss the issue thoroughly instead of asking the hon. Deputy Minister to speak on the issue here when it should fall under the domain of the Committee instead of a person - [Interruption.]
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3 p.m.
Hon. Member, you are out of order. The Ranking Member of the Committee has given a very clear indication of the dialogue that went on, I have ascertained from the Chairman and it is very clear that they had a meeting. The fact that not all members were there or some members were not does not negate whatever they did. That is why it is important that the hon. Deputy Minister enlightens the whole House on the issues that were in dispute. So hon. Deputy Minister, please, go ahead.
Mr. Hammond 3 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, so as I was saying the $50 million that have been invested in there by GNPC, about 30.5 million of that is what has gone into the wells; the other bit went into the development of other accessories out there which would have helped us so that the gas would have been properly developed or tapped.
Mr. Speaker, the company that is under consideration here is initially going to invest about $40 million in this project. Mr. Speaker, this $40 million is only for the appraisal stage. Mr. Speaker, after the company has put in the $40 million, it is
again, having satisfied itself that there is something worthy of exploration, going to invest another 400 million United States dollars in this project. The difficulty my Friends have, Mr. Speaker, is that GNPC, Government of Ghana have already invested that much money. Mr. Speaker, in comparison with what they are going to put in there, we have got the best deal that we possibly can get.
Mr. Speaker, I have indicated that
rose
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3 p.m.
Hon. Member for Tamale North, do you have a point of order?
Alhaji Abukari 3 p.m.
Yes, Mr. Speaker.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3 p.m.
Please, let us take proper point of order not just what one's personal views are.
Alhaji Abukari 3:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, my point of order is very simple. There is the perception right now that there was a meeting of the Committee out there. Mr. Speaker, the truth is that there was no such meeting -- [Interruption.]
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:10 p.m.
Hon. Member for Tamale North, I have ruled on that.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:10 p.m.
No! No! I have ruled on that.
Alhaji Abukari 3:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, let me make my point.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:10 p.m.
If that is the issue, hon. Member, [Interruption.]
Alhaji Abukari 3:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, if there is going to be a meeting in this House -- The meeting was not advertised -- [Interruption.]
Alhaji Abukari 3:10 p.m.
No hon. Member on this side knew there was a meeting. Some of the Members were here and -- [Interruption.]
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:10 p.m.
Hon. Member for Tamale North, please, resume your seat.
Alhaji Abukari 3:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, it is not correct; there was no meeting.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:10 p.m.
Hon. Deputy Minister please complete.
Mr. Hammond 3:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, with
Mr. Hammond 3:10 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, as I indicated, they are going to invest a total of $400 million in that. The problem the hon. Members on the other side have is with making comparison with some other investments that have been made by other companies.
Mr. Speaker, the point is made, for example, that there was this Company Lusan, which had this Saltpond oilfield, where there was an agreement for this company to have 60 per cent and the Ghana Government to have 40 per cent. Mr. Speaker, it is accepted by everybody in this country who understands the industry, that it is the most useless agreement that was ever reached in respect of the exploration of our resources in this country.
Hon. Iddrisu said, for example, that we are not benefiting from our resources. The only occasion that we were not going to benefit from our natural resources was when that agreement was put in place. Fortunately, Mr. Speaker, sanity prevailed, that particular arrangement has been rescheduled, it has been re-programmed, the House has ratified it and everybody is happy with that.
Mr. Speaker, they are entirely different things, we have negotiated - we have done all that we could. Mr. Speaker, there is so much investment that is needed in this particular place and we are telling hon. Members that the 121/2 per cent that they are talking about was put in there for a good measure. As I speak, with you, we are in court, we are in court in relation to other matters which have to do precisely with this issue of why it should have been this or it should not have been this.
Mr. Speaker, we should not be oblivious
of one fact; the gas that is going to come out of this particular concession is the same gas that is going to be used around the area for the purpose of either the gas or some other power generating facility at this place.
Mr. Speaker, it is the same Government of Ghana that is going to buy that gas. How if you ask them to give you so much additional interest, remember that you are
Mr. Hammond 3:20 p.m.


going to have that transferred into the price of gas in this country. It is for that reason that all these things were put together, and we came to the agreement that an extra 2.5 per cent on the normal range that -- We will normally charge the 10 per cent which was enough in the circumstance.

Mr. Speaker, we appealed to the hon. Members that there was some misunderstanding. When I went in there and I explained to the leadership that met out there, the only problem they pointed out was that, well, it would have been better if I had brought this issue to their attention rather than belatedly, but of course, it was better late than never. To those hon. Members who were not there, I appeal to them; I understand that they may not have been there, but to deny emphatically that there was no meeting is not fair.

Mr. Speaker, I plead with hon. Members - we understand what is at stake; we know that, that is the only resource that we have got around this area, that is, together with Saltpond - Together with it, it is about the only place that we think that we immediately have something. We are not going to sell it to anybody, any foreigner; we will not just sell our birthright to them. We have had so -- 12.5 per cent or nil. Consider the history, from when they were in government up to now, nobody has touched it because of how much we were asking for. Mr. Speaker, we thought it was in the interest of the country if they were going to put in $400 million to agree for them to do it.

Mr. Speaker, as has been indicated earlier on, this is not the first Petroleum Agreement that we have approved. We have been unanimous on almost all of them. This time the reason why we took the objection was the fact that the memorandum from the Ministry of Energy indicated that GNPC has invested a lot of money in that area. That is number one.

We on the Minority side have made our own preliminary enquiries and this was also confirmed, as the Ministry indicated. And we are saying that given the amount of investment, should our reward be only 2 ½ per cent over the normal exploration agreement which is 10 per cent carried interest? The carried interest for ordinary exploration agreement is 10 per cent. This time round it is 2 ½ per cent. The question which we have to resolve and which we were not able to resolve was whether the 2 ½ per cent was adequate compensation for the investment that the Government of Ghana through GNPC poured into the area.

Indeed, when we asked this question in Committee, Mr. Speaker, they were not prepared to even give us the amount of money that GNPC has invested in the area but I must say that after the matter was stood down and we met the hon. Deputy Minister for Energy and the hon. Majority Leader it came out that the amount that was invested is US$50 million. US$30.5 million of that amount, we were told, went into the actual exploration. The difference went into the pipelines and other things to fire the Effasy barge. The question that we ought to resolve is whether the 2 ½ per cent that we are putting on the 10 per cent carried interest adequately compensated the Government of Ghana for the US$50 million investment that we made in that area. If the answer is “Yes,” then we would approve it. If the answer is “No” then we would not approve it.

Mr. Speaker, another information has also been given to us in relation to a certain litigation. This was not put before the Committee. That has just been given to us. Indeed, we are also here to protect the national interest. We have to protect public interest. We cannot sacrifice the national interest on the altar of partisan politics. On that basis we feel strongly that the 2 ½ per cent cannot compensate for the US$50 million investment in that area and therefore what we ought to do is that -- My position which I did communicate to the hon. Minister is that we are going to abstain on this matter.

This is because we feel strongly and our conscience is telling us that the 2 ½ per cent carried interest that we are adding to the normal 10 per cent is not sufficient to compensate for this investment. That is what the hon. Deputy Ranking Member communicated to the House earlier on. So our position is that we are going to abstain in this matter because we do not believe that it is sufficient to compensate for it. So Government can also carry on its business and then we can also state our position on this matter and that is where we are -- Our position is that we are not going to support this motion and we are going to abstain as far as this matter is concerned.

Mr. Speaker, I must say that this is where we have got to with regard to this matter so that business can proceed in that direction.
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 3:20 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, the point should not be made that it is only the Minority that is pursuing what should be in the best interest of the country.
My hon. Colleague, the Deputy Minority Leader and I had a discussion
on this and initially we felt that we should up the 12 ½ carried interest to at least 17 ½ per cent. We thought that it could be up by at least five more percentage point to increase it to 17 ½ per cent. But we realised that we could not be resorting to any knee jerk solutions. We needed to be very scientific in our approach and analysis, which is why we threw the matter to the Ministry, that we ought to be apprised of any comparative situation elsewhere and also for the GNPC itself to come up with a write-up to justify or repudiate the additional 2 ½ percentage increase, which has now carried to the interest of the GNPC to 12 ½ per cent.
Let it be understood that the 12 ½ per cent carried interest is not going to be the only earning accruing or which may accrue to Ghana as a country. Beyond the 12 ½ per cent carried interest we have another interest, that is in the form of royalty which is 5 per cent. Then the GNPC shall have additional interest of 10 per cent. That carries the entire figure to 27 ½ per cent interest for the country because, of course, the GNPC would be representing Ghana. So all in all, it takes it up to 27 ½ per cent.
But, Mr. Speaker, as I was saying, the justification as we have been told -- Unfortunately, I must concede that the observation by the Committee itself does not really support the conclusion that the Committee came up with. That, indeed, is the kernel of the confusion. For the Committee itself to come up with the observation that,
“The Committee therefore is of the view that considering the extensive work and investments made in existing discoveries; GNPC should have negotiated for a higher carried interest than the 12.5 per cent,”
and then tu rn ou t to conc lude ,
Mr. Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 3:20 p.m.
So the
Agreement before us is proposing 12 ½ per cent. If any hon. Member thinks that any comparative analysis does indicate that it should go up, let the hon. Member show us the scientific evidence for it and I believe that if we are convinced and persuaded, definitely, we would go along with it. But I do not think that it lies in the pocket of any hon. Member to get up and say that, “Oh, pursuant to the national interest, let it go to 15 per cent; let it go to 17 ½ per cent; let it go to 20 per cent or even 30 per cent,” without any scientific basis. That, indeed, is the crux of the matter and I believe that that is the point at which that we are. I am convinced that far by the observations and the assertions of the hon. Deputy Minister and I believe that at this point we can go along with it. Mr. Speaker, I thank you for the opportunity.
Mr. F. A. Agbotse 3:20 p.m.
Mr. Speaker,
from his own argument and from the conclusion he has come to, it means that the Committee should go back to do a scientific analysis and come back to this House to give us a stable interest which should be accepted by the House. So the Committee should go back and work.
Mr. A. K. Agbesi 3:20 p.m.
Mr. Speaker,
I am not a member of this Committee but when these reports came before us
the Committee members made us aware that there are four Agreements. Just as the beginning, two were ratified. The third one is the one which is bringing the problem. I looked at the four reports which say,
“The Committee is of the view that the ratification of the Agreement would further enhance the interest of the investors in the exploration of hydrocarbon potentials.”
Mr. Speaker, you see straightaway that there is something happening about this report which we are arguing about and which we are calling on the Committee to go back and re-examine and bring it before us to look at again. This is because if at any stage the Committee is saying that we should ratify it and “it would enhance the interest of the investors,” then the interest of this nation is being sacrificed if we should ratify this Agreement.
Mr. Speaker, the end result is that the
Committee has stated a position and the position is that GNPC has not done a good negotiation. GNPC should have done something more and they have not done it. Our interest is supposed to be protected by GNPC. Once they have not done so, this report, Mr. Speaker, could not be laid before us. And then the hon. Deputy Minister is pleading with us. Why should he plead? If the report is good, it is good. He should not be pleading. If he is pleading then there is something being hidden somewhere. I want to say that this report should go back to the Committee to be examined and brought before us. This is because if their interest is only to enhance the interest of the investor while the interest of the nation is being sacrificed, it is not proper and I am saying that we should not ratify this Agreement at all. The Agreement should go back to
the Committee level.
Mr. Akwasi Osei 3:20 p.m.
None

Ejisu Juaben): Mr. Speaker, I think the issue in contention is about this 12 ½ per cent which is the interest accruing to the investors.

Mr. Speaker, we live in a country where
Mr. Osei-Adjei 3:20 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, we are
in a country where we are trying to sell assets of the nation and we always look at the revenue that we would get from the assets. We do not look at the extra, -- what is accrued. The people are going to have employment and at the same time they are going to sell the gas to the Ghana Government. If the price is too high it means we are going to price ourselves out and it is going to affect industry in the long run.
Mr. Speaker, there are certain things
Mr. Mutaka Mubarak 3:20 p.m.
On a point
of order. Mr. Speaker, the hon. Member
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Order.
Hon. Member for Asawase, that is not a point of order. That is a view.

Mr. Speaker, after this, I think my hon. Friend will by all means come to me and then we will have a little discussion about that. That is not what I am saying, I am saying that we do not have the technology, but somebody has the technology, somebody has the money and if we do not use this combination, definitely, we can never explore the resources that you have.

That is the argument I was making. I am not saying that we should sell it cheap; that is not what I am saying. But I am also saying that many a time we look at the revenue situation that is accrued to us; that is where we look.

Mr. Speaker, it is like a house -- If you have a house at airport and the house has no windows, no doors -- nothing, somebody comes in and he proposed that, “Oh, I am going to do this House and live in this house for two and half years. After two and half years the whole house is completed and, of course, you can charge me the rent that you want.” This is the situation we are talking about so I am
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Hon.
Member for Bawku Central, you have a proper point of order?
Mr. Mahama Ayariga 3:30 p.m.
Yes, Mr. Speaker, the hon. Member is seriously misleading this House. Mr. Speaker, if you look at the analogy that he is seeking to draw, he is talking about somebody who has a house without windows at East Legon and he asks you to come and invest in it et cetera. Mr. Speaker, with all due respect, a more appropriate analogy is the situation where you have spent ¢10 million on that house without a window and somebody is bringing ¢5 million to invest in that house so that it will be a “windowed” house and you are saying that after putting ¢5 million there he should own that house. It does not make sense. We are simply saying that we must recognize the investment that we have already made in that house and we must make sure that when we finish that house our equity in that house relates equitably to the investment that we have made. [Interruptions.]
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Order! Order! Hon. Member for Bawku Central, that is the analogy he thinks he can use to convince you. If you have a better analogy that is for you. Please, go ahead.
Mr. Osei-Adjei 3:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, my hon.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Hon. Minister, please just wind up.
Mr. Osei-Adjei 3:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, my
hon. Colleague maybe a good lawyer but I can tell him that I can teach him a lot of finance and then he can accept that. [Hear! Hear!] Mr. Speaker, I think the issue here is not only to look at it but to make industrial comparisons and come up with the appropriate rate applicable to that and then, of course, we you can make judicious judgment. If the hon. Deputy Minister is saying that he has been able to inform the Members of the committee as to the industrial rate applicable to the gas and oil industry, that is where the point is. Therefore I do not think we can sit here and say that it is low, or it is high, it is this, it is that. Once he has told us that it is the average within the industry we accept it and then make sure that we vote for it.
Some hon Members -- rose --
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Hon.
Members, please resume your seats. I think there is a very, very strong chance that there can be consensus. I am going to stand down this matter again. The little areas that are not too clear, attempts should be made to clarify them so that tomorrow we shall have a consensus on this matter. Hon. Majority Leader, I see that item 17 was also stood down.
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 3:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker,
I believe that you have given a good guidance and we will want to be bound by it. I think we should encourage more and more consultation, and more and more dialogue. I believe that by tomorrow the old lady would have given us better information on the matter. I therefore think that since it is already past 2.00 o'clock I do not need to do any further thing but to allow you to decide - [Interruption] - but just to remind hon. Colleagues that tomorrow we shall start sitting at 11.30 a.m. However, the Business Committee
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 3:30 p.m.


is meeting at 8.00 o'clock in the morning so that we go to the funeral grounds at 9.00 o'clock.
Mr. E. T. Mensah 3:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, having decided to stand this down, I want to suggest that we tread cautiously. This time round a full committee meeting must be held. We do not want to hear that consultations have taken place between some people and that they have arrived at whatever -- [Uproar] -- Because some of us -- [Interruption.]
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
Order! Order! The point is well made.
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 3:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, the good thing is that I do not remember hon. E. T. Mensah being a member of the Committee, but if he wants to suggest a Committee of the Whole to look at the matter I do not think the Leadership would obstruct anybody. But then all that we are trying to do is that we would want to hear from anybody who has something useful to offer. I personally would not want to endorse the suggestion that for an important item like this we should begin by abstaining because I am told that in some jurisdictions things that have longer- term benefits, you always would want to be sure that every aspects of the society is listened to. So let us do it this way. We will encourage, first, the committee members and we shall also ask the leadership of the committee to reach out to any other hon. Member who may have something to offer so that we make progress.
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
I get from the Chairman that at 9.00 o'clock the Committee will meet. The time having been near 4.00 p.m. -- [Inteterruption]
Mr. Doe Adjaho 3:30 p.m.
Mr. Speaker, we cannot meet at 9.00 o'clock tomorrow. The House itself is Sitting at 11.30 a.m. [Interruption.]
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker 3:30 p.m.
If you have something to say, let me hear it --[Laughter.]
Mr. Adjaho 3:30 p.m.
So Committee meetings are not fixed on the floor of the House, but I just want to make one comment. To make matters very easy and smooth for both sides of the House I want the hon. Majority Chief Whip to bring us the scientific basis of at adding 2.5 per cent to the 10 per cent. Then if we look at the scientific basis it can make things very smooth -- [Interruption.]
Mr. Second Deputy Speaker Deputy Minority Leader, you are out of order. Hon. Members, the House stands adjourned till tomorrow 11.30 in the forenoon.
ADJOURNMENT 3:30 p.m.

  • The House was adjourned at 3.40 p.m. till 20th July, 2006 at 11.30 a.m.