Madam Speaker, there is no specific device. I came before this august House before Parliament rose in December, to request that Parliament determined a ceiling for the termination of all international inbound calls to Ghana and to determine that ceiling at 0.19 cents. This House accordingly gave meaning to an amendment to the Electronic Communications act, allowing us to set that minimum. It has become very common in Ghana today that all of us receive calls from abroad as if they were domestic calls.
They either come in 026, 024, 027 or 020. That is fraud associated with what we call the re-routing of calls or call bypass which leads to loss of revenue to the state. It is estimated that Government loses Five Million Dollars a month as a result of that fraudulent bypass of calls. So, what Government has done in order to generate revenue to undertake meaningful development is to set a minimum of 0.19 cents.
The maximum of 0.13 cents will be held by the operators. So there is no mechanism; all we are doing is to determine the signal transfer point. If a call is going to hit Ghana, all international calls must come on the +233 number, that is Ghana's sovereign code. But if you have a call come in on 024, 026, 027, it means
they are declaring those international calls as domestic calls yet the revenue emanating from international calls is twice or thrice a domestic call.
So, it will give them an opportunity to under declare their revenue to which the state loses, Government loses.
Therefore we are saying that we want to check fraud emanating from the termination of all international inbound calls in Ghana and we accordingly came to this House, to give us the legal mandate to proceed with it. I am aware that some apprehension have been raised that we want to tap into peoples' conversation, Madam Speaker, neither do I want my phone conversation to be monitored or tapped in.
The equipment is passive and indeed when we came before this House, there was a brilliant amendment which came from this side of the House which said that, the equipment to be used shall not have the capacity to monitor data or content. Therefore the argument that an equipment is being used is neither here nor there and it is not legally tenable. Indeed, this House only strengthens section 18 (2) of the Constitution which guarantees privacy of communication.
The inclusion of section 25 (a) as was amended only reinforces article 18 (2) of the Constitution, therefore Government has no intention to monitor or tap into the conversation of any Ghanaian but we remain determined to check the fraud associated with international inbound traffic into Ghana.