Mr Speaker, that is so, which is also not the best practice in auctioning.
Mr Speaker, many civil society organisations, as well as legal practitioners have raised the issue about the findings of the Auditor-General and the work of the Public Accounts Committee -- whether that invocation of the constitutional provision to surcharge some of these wrongdoers is being done or that indeed, it is just a public talk. We do the Report and at the end of the day, it sits in our records.
Mr Speaker, thankfully, that is the reason this House has passed the Office of the Special Prosecutor Bill into law. Mr Speaker, I remember in the scope and the functions or objectives of the law, some of the things that the Special Prosecutor would prosecute are offences that are related to some of these practices which are conceived to be corrupt.
Mr Speaker, again, in the Report, we are told that the Public Procurement Act - - this is not the first time -- Mr Speaker, if you look at the Auditor-General's Report over the years, about 80 per cent of the findings of the Auditor-General are procurement breaches or malpractices. Mr Speaker, that is why I believe in the best
wisdom of the Government, in drafting the Office of the Special Prosecutor law, made it one of the offences or scopes within which the Special Prosecutor would operate.
It has stated specifically that offences that are created under the Public Procurement Act -- Mr Speaker, if you look at section 93 of the Public Procurement Act, 2003, Act 663, as amended by Act 914, it spells out clearly. It has listed a number of actions that when you do as a public office, in the area of public procurement, would be considered as an offence under the law.
Mr Speaker, if one does not follow the right procurement procedure, if contracts are given without the right transparency that is expected, these offences are spelt out. It is a long list. Mr Speaker, I believe the question that has been asked by many of my Hon Colleagues, including the Hon Member who just spoke, Hon Bedzrah is that, what are we doing? What is the way forward?
Mr Speaker, I would borrow a popular adage that goes agya ebaw o, agya ebaw o, agya anya abeduru. To wit ‘‘our daddy, is coming, our daddy is coming, now our daddy has arrived''. Mr Speaker, we now have the Office of the Special Prosecutor Law and it has stated specifically that some of the offences that would be prosecuted by this independent Special Prosecutor would be offences that are created under the Public Procurement Act, and also offences that are conceived to be corrupt practices.
Mr Speaker, it is only an improvement in our democratic dispensation and oversight function as well as our commitment to fighting corruption in this country. This is because this thing had been in the Auditor-General's Report for so many years, and we have been
lambasted by many out there, that after the Public Account Committee Report, then what happens?
Today, we know what happens. Some of these offences qualify within the scope and ambit of the Special Prosecutor's function and we believe that when he is properly brought before this House, we would decide whether we would support the nomination by His Excellency the President or not. I believe that we need that drastic step and measure to fight corruption and procurement offences qualify same under such malpractices.
Mr Speaker, on this note, I would want to thank you for the opportunity and urge the House to adopt the Report.