Mr Speaker, the principle, as I listened to the Hon Chairman, is good. My first difficulty is the headnote; “Alternative certification programme”. Just say certification. And the word, “alternative” should be deleted. We are simply saying that the agency shall award - not even provide certificates equivalent to high school for the beneficiaries of complementary education. In my view, that makes sense, but the plenty words; “alternative certification programme”, alternative to what?
What are we communicating? We are simply saying that we are clothing the Agency with the power to award the certificates, which certificates -- ? there too I have a disagreement but it is a policy matter. What they do in numeracy and literacy; is that high school? That is basic! Why are we giving them high school certificate and not basic school certificate? That would be my second difficulty.
Mr Speaker, but I think that we should just say certification. The Agency shall award certificates equivalent to high school for beneficiaries of complementary education. Then, we have something to go with so that the headnote would read, “Certification” or “Award of certificates”. But alternative certification programme, what is provide alternative? We want them to award certificates.
Mr Speaker, I used to, in the days of the Revolution, be a teacher for Non-Formal Education in a village called Pagazaa, Tamale, and it is true, they awarded some blue certificates which we gave out to the beneficiaries. At that time, it was voluntary; in the night, we would gather the adults and take them through some training. So, there are some certificates, and that one, the Ministry would determine the nature and form of the certificate.
If the Hon Chairman is amenable to accepting this, this is how I think it should be. We want to give them the power to award certificates; we should not qualify it as “alternative certificate”.