Debates of 27 Feb 2007

MR. SPEAKER
PRAYERS 10:10 a.m.

CORRECTION OF VOTES 10:10 a.m.

AND PROCEEDINGS AND THE 10:10 a.m.

OFFICIAL REPORT 10:10 a.m.

Mr. Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Order! Order! Correc- tion of Votes and Proceedings of Friday, 23rd February, 2007. Pages 1…20. Hon. Members, we have the Official Report for Wednesday, 14th February 2007. [No corrections were made.] Item 3.
Minister for Parliamentary Affairs/ Majority Leader (Mr. F. K. Owusu- Adjapong 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, at the last Sitting you directed that we should look at this problem relating to the Minister for Presidential Affairs, the Chief of Staff, as regards the Ghana @ 50. I am pleased to inform you that I have consulted my hon. Colleague, the Minister for Presidential Affairs and he is appearing before the Finance Committee tomorrow at 11.30 a.m. so that if there are some things that we must clarify, I thought that I should inform the House accordingly.
Mr. Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Majority Leader, when is he appearing?
Mr. Owusu-Adjapong 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, tomorrow at 11.30 a.m. In fact, I felt there was the need to give information to the House on the matter.
Minority Leader (Mr. A. S. K. Bagbin) 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, it is important that we take this opportunity to inform the whole country as to the procedures involved and the powers vested in our committees. I think what happened at the Finance Committee was a slap in the face of Parliament. No Minister determines for Parliament whom we should invite to Parliament. It is not for a Minister to determine that.
By our Standing Orders, it is for Ministers we invite to the floor of the House to answer Questions. But for committees of the House, they can invite any person, any institution, any organization and the person can appear before the committee and give some reasons, but not just to ignore the committee and say that in his view this is the proper person to appear before the committee. That is completely wrong and contemptuous of this House.
We agree that it is a matter Maybe, he did that without the right information. I do not want to say that he did it in ignorance but I believe that as experienced as he is, he should have known all these things and should have accorded Parliament that respect. I believe strongly that tomorrow, the Committee on Finance would have to insist that he himself should appear with the Minister.
Dr. Wireko-Brobbey should appear before the Finance Committee and then he can explain and allow his Minister to answer whatever questions. But they believed that those questions that they were going to ask him were within his competence. Because, trying to get the role that, for example, we would play or what his Secretariat is doing is something that he can tell the committee. If they ask a question which is beyond him then he can say that “well, this one is for my Minister to answer and not me,” but he should not have treated the Committee in that shabby manner. It is important we emphasize it.

The whole society our brothers and sisters in civil society, our hon. Colleagues in the executive arm of government will have to do everything to support this House to function, to make sure that we still remain the bulwark of democracy.
Mr. Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Minority Leader, thank you for that. I myself was awaiting a full report from the Finance Committee. In fact, we do not have any full report from the Finance Committee as to what really happened. That is just unfortunate. But whatever it is, we leave it with the Leadership of the House.
ORAL ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS 10:10 a.m.

MINISTRY OF ENERGY 10:10 a.m.

Minister for Energy (Mr. J. K. Adda) 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, following the encouraging results of tests on samples of bio-diesel and realizing how its properties compare with those of fossil diesel, the Ministry has taken various steps towards establishing bio-fuels as an integral part of the country's energy mix.
In August 2003, the Ministry tasked the Energy Commission to examine the feasibility of producing and consuming not only bio-diesel but biofuels in Ghana. The Commission recommended that there is the need for the development of a policy and regulatory framework for the
production and use of biofuels in Ghana.
In pursuance of this, the Ministry in August 2005, constituted a committee to draft a National Biofuels Policy. A draft policy has been completed and the Ministry is currently reviewing the policy document from which actionable activities will be formulated under a National Bio-fuels Strategy and Implementation Programme.
In June 2006, representatives from the committee, BOST and Energy Commission visited India and Malaysia on a study tour to apprise themselves of the equipment use din biofuel production as well as study developments and experiences in the biofuels industries of these countries. It is our hope that all these measures will enable the nation benefit from oil seed plants such as Jatropha in our bid to add to our fuel supply.
Dr. Kwame Ampofo 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I further ask the hon. Minister, considering the impact of price fluctuations of petroleum products on our economy, what is the Ministry doing to fast track this biofuel programme in Ghana?
Mr. Adda 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, in our efforts to fast track the production of biofuels to support the country's fuel needs, we have indeed been consulting with various funding agencies to support us in developing large scale farms that will produce some of the oil seed plants such as Jatropha. There are many other activities that are currently on-going and we are sure that very soon those will turn into concrete results.
Dr. Ampofo 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I wish to ask the hon. Minister to explain to the House the pricing policy on using biofuel in the country.
Mr. Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Hon. Member, this is not
Mr. Speaker 10:10 a.m.


a supplementary question. Pricing policy is not a supplementary question. You may wish to come back properly.
Dr. Ampofo 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I wish to ask a different supplementary question then.
Mr. Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Please, go on.
Dr. Ampofo 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I wish to know from the hon. Minister, since the recommendation of the committee he has formed indicates that there is the need for a regulatory framework -- and I believe that includes the legislative aspect of the policy - how his outfit is involving Parliament in this process.
Mr. Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Hon. Member, kindly repeat the question.
Dr. Ampofo 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, my question is about how the Ministry is involving Parliament in coming out with the programme, particularly the legislative and the regulatory aspects of the programme.
Mr. Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Is it in respect of the Jetropha plant?
Dr. Ampofo 10:10 a.m.
It is in respect of biofuels utilization in Ghana.
Mr. Adda 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, as my hon. Colleague is an experienced Member of this House, he knows the procedures we go through. The Draft Regulatory Framework is before the Ministry; it has even gone through Cabinet to get here. Once we exhaust the process it will come to Parliament for consideration.
Mr. F. A. Agbotse 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to find out from the Minister what the Ministry's policy is with regard to private individuals and companies which are interested in this biofuel programme.
Mr. Adda 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, as I indicated, the Draft Policy and Regulatory Framework is a subject by review of the Ministry; it is not concluded yet. But as a general policy of the Ministry to encourage private participation in supporting the energy's implementation efforts, I am quite sure that the way will be opened for private individuals and businesses to be able to produce these oil seeds to feed the factories that will be using the biofuels.
Mr. Charles Hodogbey 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, my question is - The hon. Minister said people have been sent to India and Malaysia to apprise themselves of the equipment used in extracting biofuel. I would like to know if the Jetropha plant is in India or Malaysia where oil is being extracted; or are the equipment being used in India and Malaysia The plant which the fuel is extracted is it different from the Jetropha plant?
Mr. Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Hon. Member for North Tongu, I want to understand your own question first. Would you be kind enough to repeat it?
Mr. Hodogbey 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, in his answer he stated that the equipment will be appraised in India and Malaysia for extracting the biofuel. I would like to know if the Jetropha plant is in India where oil is being extracted now.
Dr. Adda 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, if I understand the question from my hon. Colleague very well, yes; there are plants being produced in India and Malaysia and there are equipment in these two countries that are being used to produce the biofuel. I do not know whether it is satisfactory to my hon. Colleague.
Mr. Abdul-Rashid Pelpuo 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to find out from the hon. Minister whether he is aware that there is already an existing company
established to develop and produce the plant in Ghana; and whether in the event of the breakthrough we are talking about in the production of Jetropha, he has made adequate arrangements to ensure that land is released enough for the plant to be cultivated, because that is the critical point in the Jetropha production and in the biofuel production.
Mr. Adda 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am aware that there are various individuals and companies that are indulging in various levels of development of this plant as a potential source of biofuel. I am not exactly certain as to the factory or particular production plant that my hon. Colleague is talking about.
Mr. E. K. D Adjaho 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the hon. Minister indicated to the House that the draft policy has been completed. I want to find out from him when this policy was completed, when he expects that the review will be completed, and when he expects that it will be laid in this House.
Mr. Adda 10:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I have not quite understood the question coming from my hon. Colleague.
Mr. Doe Adjaho 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the hon. Minister indicated in his printed Answer that they have completed the draft policy. I want to find out from him when that draft policy was completed. And he said they are going to review it; when will the review be completed? And when will that policy pass through Cabinet and be laid in this honourable House for us to know the policy direction with regard to bio-fuel?
Mr. Adda 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the review will be completed later this year. As I indicated in my Answer, various implementation activities are being scheduled and from that we will know the time-frame that

will drive the whole process. That is to say that it is from that implementation schedule that we will know when that draft regulatory framework will go to Cabinet and when it will come to Parliament.

Connection of Electricity to the

National Grid (Asuofori-Akanteng- Kobriso, Afranse-Brekumanso-

Oworam-Pabi)

Electricity to Asuofori-Akanteng- Kobriso, etc

Q. 445. Mr. James Appietu-Ankrah asked the Minister for Energy when the following towns in the Lower West Akim Constituency would be connected to the national electricity grid:

(i) Asuofori-Akanteng-Kobrso

( i i ) A f r a n s e - B r e k u m a n s o - Oworam- Pabi

( i i i ) K a k o a s e - N k u r a k a n - Anomo- kwadwo
Mr. Kofi Adda 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, with the exception of the Kakoase community, all other communities listed above have been earmarked for connection to the national electricity grid under the JICA-5 electrification project to be sponsored by a Japanese Government Grant. Implemen- tation of the project is scheduled to commence in April 2007 and would be completed in January, 2008.
The Kakoase community, which has not been listed under any of the Ministry's on-going projects, would be considered under the SHEP if it meets the eligibility criteria.
Mr. Appietu-Ankrah 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
I want the hon. Minister for Energy to educate me on what the eligibility criteria are.
Mr. Adda 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the eligibility
Mr. Speaker 10:20 a.m.
Question No. 446 --
Hon. Richmond Sam Quarm, Member of Parliament for Gomoa West.
Mr. Richmond Sam Quarm 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, as a point of correction it is Richmond Sam Quarm, Member of Parliament for Gomoa East and not Gomoa West.
Electricity to Kweikrom, Mampong, Dabanyin etc.
Q. 446. Mr. Richmond Sam Quarm asked the Minister for Energy when the following communities would be connected to the national electricity grid:
(i) Kweikrom,
(ii) Mampong,
(iii) Dabanyim,
(iv) Akraman
(v) Dasum and
(vi) Odumase.
Mr. Adda 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, Gomoa Mampong, Odumase and Akraman form part of the on-going projects being carried out by the Ministry. Installation works for High Tension and Low Tension networks have been completed at Odumase. The outstanding works at Odumase are customer service connections. The
servicing of customers in this community will commence upon completion of the registration of the customers with ECG.
Contact for installation works at Mampong has just been awarded. Installation works are to be completed by end of June 2007.
Installation works at Milani Pineapple Factory at Akraman have been completed. The outstanding works at the factory are testing and commissioning of the network. This is currently being done by ECG. It would be completed by end of March
2007.
In the Akraman community itself, installation works are on-going. The outstanding Low Voltage (LV) works in the community have been scheduled for completion by end of March 2007.
The Dabanyim, Dasum and Kweikrom communities have been earmarked for connection to the national electricity grid under the SHEP-4. The community however does not form part of the on- going SHEP-4 Phase-I project. The community would be connected in the subsequent phases of the SHEP-4 in line with the implementation schedule.
Mr. Quarm 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, because of the mistake made in the advertisement that the Member of Parliament is comes from Gomoa West, we have two communities - Mampong, one in Gomoa West and one in Gomoa East; and Odumase, one in the West, one in the East. So actually, I am at a loss as to which this Answer applies to. So I would want some clarifications. If not, he can come back later to clarify. Because, in the Gomoa West we have Kokofu Mampong and then in Gomoa East we have Gomoa Assin Mampong. Then in the Gomoa West we have Anteade Odumase and in Gomoa East we have Buduata Odumase. So -- [Interruption.]
Mr. Speaker 10:20 a.m.
Hon. Member, do you have a supplementary question?
Mr. Quarm 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, this arises out of the Answer the hon. Minister gave. Mr. Speaker, I do not know which Mampong or which Odumase the Answer refers to.
Mr. Speaker 10:20 a.m.
But then ask a question, if you have any.
Mr. Quarm 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I just want
to know from the hon. Minister if the printed Answer, relating to Mampong and Odumase, refers to the communities in Gomoa East or Gomoa West?
Mr. Adda 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, to the best of my knowledge these communities are in the district that covers the two constituencies. I would have to come back with the clarification that he needs as to where each belongs to.
Electrification Works in Bongoro, etc (Completion)
Q. 447. Mr. George Kofi Arthur asked the Minister for Energy when electrification works in the following towns would be completed.
(i) Bongoro,
(ii) Ampontengkrom,
(iii) Eguabase,
(iv) Adjakaa Manso No.1,
(v) Bankyease,
(vi) Konkonkyea
(vii) Anomatewa and
Mr. Adda 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, under the SHEP-4 Phase-I project, four communities namely Bungalo, Ampontenkrom, Eguabase and Bankyease are earmarked for connection to the national electricity grid. It is planned that these communities would be connected before the end of the year, all things being equal.
The K. Boateng community forms part of the SHEP-4 but not part of the on-going SHEP-4 Phase-I project. The community would therefore be connected in the subsequent phases of the SHEP-4 in line with the implementation schedule.
The remaining communities namely Adjakaa Manso No.1, Konkonkyea and Anomatewa have not been listed under any of the on-going projects being carried out by the Ministry. The communities may therefore apply for consideration under the SHEP-4 if they meet the eligibility criteria.
Mr. Arthur 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to know from the hon. Minister why the contractor working on the project started but decided to stop at a point and abandoned the project?
Mr. Adda 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, we are in the process of reviewing the work of all of our contractors this year. And I would have to come back on the status of this particular project.
Mr. Arthur 10:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the contract
was given to one contractor called A. Boat Electricals. I want to know from the hon. Minister whether there are enough materials to enable the Ministry complete this project in ten months as he has promised, because the contractor complained of lack of materials.
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, for the past few months we have run out of some critical materials. We have since been getting some regular supplies of them but I am not exactly certain as to what types of materials this particular contractor is looking for. But if they are the types of materials that we have been getting supplies of, I am quite sure that we will be getting them to complete the work on schedule.
Mr. Arthur 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to know whether the contract would be given to the same contractor or it would be re-packaged.
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I indicated
that we are reviewing the performance of all of our contractors and if any contractor is found not to be measuring up to our expectations he may not continue the work that has been assigned to him. In the case of this particular contractor, he will also be subjected to that review and I will inform my hon. Colleague of the outcome at the appropriate time.
Supply of Electric Meters
Q. 448. Mr. George Kofi Arthur asked the Minister for Energy when the second phase of Electric Meters would be supplied to the newly connected areas under the SHEP-IV.
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker we note that
the communities involved were connected under the European Union Grant Aid Project. Upon completion of the project, several additional customers requested the Ministry of Energy for the supply of meters. The Ministry requested the ECG accordingly to register the additional customers. ECG has recently submitted a list of about 8,000 registered customers for the consideration of the Ministry.
The Ministry intends to complete the installation of the additional meters by end of July, 2007.
Mr. Arthur 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to know why some late submissions for the meters have been supplied but early submissions have not got their meters.
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, as you know, I am not on the ground on the distribution of meters from house to house. I think I would have to investigate that and report to my hon. Colleague.
Mr. Arthur 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to know how much a customer must pay as a registration fee for a meter to be installed.
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, with your kind
permission I would have to come back to my hon. Colleague with the answer.
Mr. Arthur 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like
to know whether it is the responsibility of a customer to pay for the cost of cables to connect his meter?
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, many customers tend to use certain terms that are not quite understood by the technical personnel. When one refers to cables, it could run from 120 milimetre cables, 50 millimetre cables down to smaller coils of wires. I am not sure what types of cables my hon. Colleague is talking about and so he has to clarify his question for me to give him adequate response.
Dr. Kwame Ampofo 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the issue of unavailability of meters in respect of this SHEP has been a big problem all over the country. I am sure the hon. Minister must be aware of that. My question is, what is he doing to streamline this meters issue so that the SHEP programme can be made more efficient as regards supply of meter?
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr Speaker, I am indeed aware of the situation that my hon. colleague has raised. Indeed, in my constituency I faced a similar problem. The Ministry is being assisted by the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning with funding to be able to acquire more meters for the Electricity Company of Ghana. Also under some of our funding arrangements with our development partners funds are being made available and we are hoping that in the near future we can conclude these negotiations to have adequate supplies of meters for the entire country.
Houses Affected by High Tension lines (Compensation)
Q. 450. Mr. Sallas-Mensah (on behalf of Mr. S. A. Kwao) asked the Minister for Energy what compensation was there for the people whose houses and other properties had been affected by high tension lines constructed by the Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG).
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, we note
that the Electricity Company of Ghana does not normally construct high tension lines on people's properties. In extreme cases however, which is very rare, the ECG may construct high tension lines and undertake the necessary measures to resolve issues with the communities including compensation. While the Ministry is unaware of the situation of Upper Manya, it is important for the House to note that the Ministry has delegated the settlement of compensation issues to the District Assemblies in matters of rural electrification.
Mr. John Tia 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the hon. Minister has stated that the House should take note that the settlement of compensation issues has been delegated to District Assemblies. I want to know
from him when these responsibilities were delegated to the District Assemblies and I want the citation by way of proof of a letter delegating this matter to the Assemblies.
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, this policy had been around for a couple of years and I need some time to bring the citation to my hon. Colleague.
Mr. Tia 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to know from the hon. Minister whether before the delegation of this responsibility the issue was discussed with the Assemblies. This is because, it has to do with money or funding and we know that issues of compensations attract huge sums of money. I want to know from the hon. Minster whether this issue was discussed at the various Assemblies and they accepted it.
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, yes indeed, the issue was discussed with the Assemblies including issues of providing low voltage poles for them. I am fully aware that has happened.
Mr. Mahama Ayariga 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker,
when the Minister said that the issue had been discussed with the Assemblies, is he suggesting that his Ministry held meetings with all the Assemblies in this country and discussed it with them and they endorsed that proposal? If so, when?
Mr. Adda 10:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, whether the Ministry visited other districts one after the other or called them all together at the Institute of Local Government Studies or any other institute, there was indeed a discussion with all of the Assemblies; and that has taken place.
Mr. Ayariga 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the question is when and where did the Ministry meet with all Assemblies to discuss and obtain

their endorsement of this policy, not which options are available.
Mr. Adda 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I have not heard the question quite clearly, if he may repeat it.
SHEP IV at Bouban (Completion)
Q. 477. Alhaji Mohammed Muntaka Mubarak asked the Minister for Energy what steps the Ministry was taking to complete the SHEP IV (Electrification Project) at Buoban in the Asawase constituency.
Mr. Adda 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the electrifi- cation of Buoban has been substantially completed. The community required two transformers, of which one was installed owing to the fact that all the two were not available at the time. The part of the community which had their transformer installed had enjoyed electricity ever since. We note tat the Ministry has recently taken delivery of the type of transformers involved and would arrange to send the remaining one to the Kakoase community, which has not been listed under any of the Ministry's on-going projects, would be considered under the SHEP if it meets the eligibility criteria.
Alhaji Mubarak 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, in the hon. Minister's Answer he said, “substan-tially completed”. May I ask the hon. Minister, what is the percentage of completion?
Mr. Adda 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I did not hear the last part of his question.
Mr. Speaker 10:40 a.m.
Hon. Member for Asawase, kindly repeat it.
Alhaji Mubarak 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am saying that in his Answer he said the work has been substantially completed, and I
Alhaji Mubarak 10:40 a.m.


want to ask him what the percentage of completion is.
Mr. Adda 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I do not have the specific figures here before me. I would have to come back to my hon. Colleague.
Alhaji Mubarak 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the reason why I am asking this question is that, like he rightly said, one transformer has been provided. And if one looks at the general plan close to 40 per cent --Even poles have not been erected; no wiring has been done, and if he is saying that by just bringing the transformer they would get electricity by March -- That was why I wanted him to tell us how this could happen because poles have not been erected, there are no electrical materials and the last time the contractor was seen there was about six months ago. So I want the hon. Minister to tell the people of Asawase when, for sure, this project would be completed.
Mr. Adda 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, it was very clear in my response that the electrification project will be completed by March 2007. That goes without saying that whatever needs to go along with the transformer would have to be in place before the work would be completed. Therefore, all accessories that are required, if not readily available, would also have to be supplied in addition to the transformer.
Ms. Akua S. Dansua 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to know from the hon. Minister what his basis is, for the assurance that he has given this House. Has he been there himself to see what is happening or has he sent his technical men to go and inspect the project as it is now?
Mr. Adda 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, my basis is on the status reports that have been coming from the field. I have not gone there on my own yet, but I hope to go there very soon.
Mr. E. P. Aidoo 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to find out from the hon. Minister why the SHEP IV, Phase 1 projects have been delayed in Asawase in particular and the country in general.
Mr. Speaker 10:40 a.m.
Hon. Member, your question again, but restrict it to Asawase.
Mr. E. P. Aidoo 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to find out from the hon. Minister why the SHEP IV, Phase 1 projects in Asawase in particular and the country in general have been delayed?
Mr. Speaker 10:40 a.m.
Minister for Energy, you may answer the question on Asawase.
Mr. Adda 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think I answered the question on Asewase. It is not an isolated case. It is not the case of any community being considered and Asewase not being considered. It is precisely because of the problems that I have mentioned.
Dr. Ampofo 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, now that our country has been plunged into an energy crisis, meaning that there is no sufficient power to go round, how would the extension of power under the SHEP and other programmes affect an already bad situation; and how does he wish to rectify the situation?
Mr. Speaker 10:40 a.m.
Hon. Member for South Dayi, come properly.
Mr. Ayariga 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, when the hon. Minister says in his Answer that the project has been substantially completed, on what basis does he make the statement that a project has been substantially completed?
Mr. Adda 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I think the hon. Colleague who asked the original Question posed this question and I responded. I said it is based on the status
reports that I have seen. I have not been there physically to look at it and I do not know but for the fact that there is a transformer that is required. As I indicated, if there are any other accessories that are needed I would be able to provide these.
Mr. Speaker 10:40 a.m.
Hon. Minister for Energy, thank you very much for appearing to answer these Questions.
At the Commencement of Public Business -- item 5 -- Laying of Papers. The following Papers to be laid: (a) -- Leadership, have you been able to resolve this matter?
Mr. F. K. Owusu-Adjapong 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, Leadership has not met on the matter but I thought that the proper procedure was that your ruling would stand until Leadership came with a different approach. Otherwise, it would amount to keeping the Business of the House delayed. So I thought that should have been the proper procedure. You have given a ruling; it can continue working, and Leadership can meet on the matter.
Mr. Speaker, because the other day if you had allowed some of us to contribute to the debate we would have proved to you that in point of fact people are misconstruing the functions of the Public Accounts Committee. So I would want us to lay this document, refer it to the Committee as you initially directed and then when Leadership comes out with any other thing it would guide the House. The other day you yourself advised that when things are not clear that is where you exercise your prerogative.
Mr. John Tia 10:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the issue is that we have to deal with procedure and the one who raised the concern about your ruling or referral did so because it was not too clear as to who is responsible. So you then referred the matter to the Leadership.
Mr. John Tia 10:40 a.m.


I think that we should accept that we have failed to do it and urge ourselves to do it immediately and report to the House so that we do not set the precedent that every time we have to go and sort one or two things out and come back; then we are not doing anything at all. We should be able to advise you latest tomorrow on this matter and then we would resolve it once and for all.
Mr. Speaker 10:40 a.m.
I direct that this matter be deferred. We may take it up maybe tomorrow.
PAPERS 10:40 a.m.

Mr. Speaker 10:40 a.m.
Item 6 -- Motion -- Minister for Education, Science and Sports --
Mr F. K. Owusu-Adjapong 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to crave your indulgence to move the motion for the Second Reading of this Bill, in the absence of the hon. Minister for Education, Science and Sports.
Mr. Speaker 10:50 a.m.
Please, go ahead.
BILLS SECOND READING 10:50 a.m.

Minister for Parliamentary Affairs/ Majority Leader (Mr. F. K. Owusu- Adjapong) 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to move, that the Polytechnics Bill be now read a Second time.
Mr. Speaker, the object of the Bill is to revise the law relating to polytechnics to make changes considered consequential to the Polytechnics Law (1992) PNDC L 321 as a result of constitutional require- ments. The Bill also reflects changes in the education policies and restructuring in accordance with the educational strategic plan of the Ministry of Education, Science and Sports.
The existence of our polytechnics and the programmes they offer have over the years been plagued with many problems, including the placement of polytechnic graduates in employment, vis-à-vis their colleagues from the universities.
The Bill seeks to empower polytechnic councils to support the Government's educational reform efforts and also solve the problems which constrain polytechnic education and hinder development in the country.
The Bill allows the establishment
of external relationship between the polytechnics and civil society, industry, employers, other institutions of higher learning and the Government. It is for
these and other reasons that I move for the Second Reading of this Bill.
Mr. Speaker, I so move.
Question proposed.
Mr. S. K. B. Manu (NPP -- Ahafo Ano South) 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to support the motion. And in doing so I would like to read the introduction background, the purpose of the Bill and the conclusion and crave your indulgence for the Hansard Department to capture the entire Report as having been read on the floor of the House.
1.0 Introduction
In pursuance of article 103 of the 1992 Constitution, and Order 187 of the Standing Orders of the House, the Polytechnics Bill was laid in the House on 15th December, 2005 and referred to the Committee on Education for examination and report.
2.0 Deliberations
The Committee invited the general public to its deliberations. Memoranda and oral submissions were also received from interested individuals and stakeholders.
The Committee also benefited from a day's stakeholder's workshop on the Bill organized by the National Council for Tertiary Education in collaboration with the Ministry of Education, Science and Sports.
The Committee is grateful to the Minister in charge of Education, former Minister of State in charge of Tertiary Education, the Executive Secretary, NCTE and the other stakeholders for providing the necessary inputs and clarifications during the examination of the Bill.
3.0 References
The Committee has relied on the following in finalizing this report:
i. Background Note received from the Ministry of Education, Science and Sports;
ii. Prof. Kwami's Report on the state of the country's Polytechnics;
iii. Mr. Paul Effah's (NCTE) Paper on the country's Polytechnics;
iv. Verbatim record and Oral evidence taken on the Bill; and
v. Presentations and clarifications by stakeholders.
4.0 Background
Polytechnics in Ghana were established under Section 1 of the Polytechnics Law, 1992 (PNDCL 321) and continued in existence under sub-section (1) of the same Law.
There are currently ten (10) Polytechnics in the country, with one (1) in each region. The main aims and objectives of the polytechnics have been to:
(i) provide tertiary education through full time courses in the fields of manufacturing, commerce, science, technology, applied social sciences, applied arts and such other areas as may be determined by the authority for the time being responsible for higher education;
(ii) encourage study in technical subjects at tertiary level; and
(iii) provide opportunity for develop- ment, research and publication of research findings.
The Polytechnics Bill 2005 has been
Mr. S. K. B. Manu (NPP -- Ahafo Ano South) 10:50 a.m.
7.2 Schedule
The Committee is of the view that the arrangement of the list of existing polytechnics, if it is alphabetical, then Sunyani should come between Kumasi and Takoradi Polytechnics.
7.3 Affiliation to Universities Clause 2
Clause 2 provides that a polytechnic shall be affiliated to an existing accredited university. The Committee takes exception to the continued comparison of the polytechnics to the universities and their consequent affiliations.
The Committee opines that universities could not provide appropriate mentorship to the polytechnics due to the differences in their missions and orientation and that the best that the universities could do for polytechnics when affiliated, is to model the later to be like a university. If this happens, then, the purpose of establishing polytechnics would have been defeated.
The Committee maintains that a polytechnic should not necessarily be affiliated to a university but any relevant accredited tertiary institution. The Committee therefore proposes an amendment to Clause 1 (1) and (2) to reflect the view expressed above.
7.4 Powers of a Polytechnic, Clause 6
Powers of a polytechnic are provided for under clause 6 of the Bill.
Clause 6 (a empowers a polytechnic to award Higher National Diploma, diplomas and other certificates agreed upon by its Council.
It was however observed by the Committee that no provision has been made to mandate the National Council

for Tertiary Education to approve of such programmes before they run. This, in the view of the Committee if not rectified, may lead to a situation where the polytechnics may be running courses without recourse to the National Council for Tertiary Education.

The Committee noted with delight that Clause 6 (b) empowers a polytechnic to award degrees. It views this as laudable since in the opinion of the Committee this has an added advantage of stopping the current practice whereby polytechnic graduates enroll in courses at the existing universities just for the acquisition of degrees which have no bearing on their profession.

The Committee is however of the view that polytechnics should not be awarding degrees for the sake of it. Degree programmes offered in a polytechnic should be technology-based to reflect the mission and aspirations for which the polytechnic was established.

The Committee accordingly proposes a revision to Clause 6 (a) and (b) to read as follows:

A polytechnic shall:

(a) “award Higher Nat ional Diplomas, diplomas and other certificates agreed by its Council provided that the programme is approved by the National Council for Tertiary Education (NCTE), accredited by the National Accreditation Board (NAB) and moderated by the National Board for Profes-sional and Technician Examina-tions

(NEBPTEX).”

(b) “award technology-based degrees approved by the National Council for Tertiary

Education (NCTE) and accredi- ted by the National Accredi- tation Board (NAB); subject to the conditions that the Council of a polytechnic may deter- mine”.

The Committee further observed that National Board for Professional and Technician Examinations has been wrongly quoted in the Bill as “National Board for Technician and Professional Examination”. The Committee therefore proposes its correction.

7 . 5 G o v e r n i n g B o d y o f a Polytechnic, Clause 7

A governing body of a polytechnic as well as its composition has been provided for under clause 7. The Committee views the composition of the governing body comprising mainly of internal members as unacceptable and recommends that subclause (c) be deleted.

Subclause (j) also provides for a representation from the Ghana Institute of Engineers on the Council. The Committee is satisfied with a represen-tation of a professional body on the Council but is of the view that since not all polytechnics offer engineering programmes, it should not be mandatory for every polytechnic to have a member of the Ghana Institute of Engineering on its Council. It therefore recommends that a representative of the relevant professional body should be represented on the Council in line with programmes offered by the individual polytechnics.

Again since a Polytechnic may offer more than one professional programme at a time, the representation should be on rotational basis. Thus, subclause (j) should be revised to reflect the above view.

Clause 6 (1) provides for a represen- tation from the Ministry of Education with a rank not below a Director. The Committee is however of the view that due to the continuous changes in names and alignments of Ministries, subclause (1) be reviewed to read, “one representative of the Ministry responsible for Education”. Further, the phrase “not below the rank of Director” be deleted to relieve the over- burdened line directors and to enable the Minister to use his discretion in appointing the most appropriate person.

The Committee further proposes an amendment to subclause (m) to make for the deletion of (c) proposed earlier. Subclause (m) should now read as follows:

“(m) two other persons, one of whom shall be a woman”.

Another phrase to allow a representative of the National Council for Tertiary Education, the Vice Rector and the Finance Officer to be in attendance is being proposed.

7.6 Functions of a Council, clause 8 (h)

The Committee observed that the word “institute” has been used instead of “institution” and proposes a correction to that effect.

7.7 Functions of the Rector

It was further observed by the Committee that clause 25 (b) (i) and 25 (d) seek to do the same thing. It therefore proposes that clause 25 (d) be retained and renumbered (a) and 25 (b) (i) deleted and the subclauses renumbered accordingly. This is due to the fact that 25 (d) stands alone and constitutes an important function of the Rector.

7.8 Management of finances of a polytechnic, clause 30 (4)

The Committee observed that the word
Mr. S. K. B. Manu (NPP -- Ahafo Ano South) 10:50 a.m.


“commission” was omitted and proposes its insertion.

7.9 Accounts and Audit, clause 31

Clause 31 (1) provides that the Council shall keep books of accounts and proper records in relation to them and the accounts books and records shall be in a form approved by the Auditor-General.

In practice however, the Council does not keep the books and other records by itself. They are normally kept by the finance officer and his staff.

To this end, the Committee proposes an amendment to reflect this reality.

7 . 1 0 R e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h o t h e r Institutions

Clause 35 provides that the Council of the Polytechnic shall in the performance of its functions collaborate with the university to which it is affiliated, the National Council for Tertiary Education and any other private or public institution that the Council considers necessary.

The Committee considers this objective laudable but is of the view that since it has already proposed that the Polytechnic should not necessarily be affiliated to the universities; there would be inconsistencies if the above clause is not revised. The Committee therefore proposes revision to subclause (a) to read as follows:

“(a) other tertiary education institutions”.

7.11 Interpretation

The Committee also observed an error under the provision for interpretation as the “National Accreditation Board Law 1993 (PNDCL 317)” was wrongly stated as “National Accreditation Board Law,

1992 (PNDC 321)”. It therefore proposes a correction to rectify the anomaly.

7 . 1 2 Tr a n s f e r o f a s s e t s a n d liabilities, clause 39 (1)

The Committee noted that subclause (1) as provided in the Bill is ambiguous and could be abused. To avoid any ambiguity therefore, a different rendition for clause 39 on transfer of assets and liabilities is proposed as follows:

(a) The deletion of subclause (1) of clause 39,

(b) The insertion on line 1 of subclause (2), after the word “to” of the following words:

“the directions in writing of the Minister”.

The new subclause (1) of clause 39 should therefore read as follows:

“(1) Subject to the directions in writing of the Minister, the assets, rights and properties held by or on behalf of or for the purposes of a polytechnic in existence immediately before the commencement of this Act and the persons employed for that polytechnic are by this section transferred to the respective polytechnics established under this Act”.

8.0 Amendments Proposed

In the light of the above observations, the Committee proposes the following amendments. The list includes corrections made to typographical errors, omissions as well as redraft of some of the Clauses to give clarity to the provisions.

1. Page 3 clause 1, after subclause (2), add a new subclause (3) as follows:

(3) Each polytechnic shall be a corporate body with perpetual succession, a

common seal and may sue or be sued in its own name.

2. Page 3 clause 2 (1), delete the word “university” after accredited and insert the words “relevant tertiary institution”.

3. Page 3 clause 2 (2), after the existing, delete the word “university” and insert the phrase “relevant tertiary institu- tion”.

4. Page 4 clause 6 (a),

i. line 2, after Council, delete “with” and insert the phrase “provided that the programme is approved by the National Council for Tertiary Education, accredited by” and

ii. line 3, before “the” insert “mode- rated by”.

5. Page 4, clause 6 (b),

a. line 1, after “award”, insert “technology-based”; and

b. line 1, after “degrees” insert the following: “approved by the National Council for Tertiary Education and accredited by the National Accreditation Board”.

6. Page 4, clause 7(1), after subclause (b), delete all and insert the follo- wing as new subclause:

“ ( c ) o n e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of the Teacher s and Educat iona l Workers Union,

( d ) o n e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f t h e P o l y t e c h n i c
Mr. S. K. B. Manu (NPP -- Ahafo Ano South) 10:50 a.m.


delete “university” and insert “relevant tertiary institution”

12. Page 13 clause 37 line 8, delete “1992 (PNDCL 321)” and insert

“1993 (PNDCL 317)”

13. Page 14 clause 39;

(a) delete subclause (1)

(b) subclause (2) line 1, after the word “to” insert the following words “the directions in writing of the Minister”.

9.0 Conclusion

The importance of the Polytechnic Bill cannot be over emphasized as it seeks to empower Polytechnic Councils to support the government's education reform efforts and also solve the problems which constrain polytechnic education and hinder the development of the country. This is very much in line with the policy of improving upon the quality of education in the country as well as creation of jobs.

The Committee therefore recommends that the honourable House passes the polytechnics, Bill subject to the additional clauses and amendments proposed above.

Respectfully submitted.
Mr. J. K. Gidisu (NDC -- Central Tongu) 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I rise to associate myself with the motion on the floor. I want to say that it is most unfortunate that after being introduced in 2005, it is only now that the Bill is seeing light in this House. Considering the turmoil in the polytechnics in the past years, one would have expected that this Bill would have come up earlier.
Mr. Speaker, nonetheless, one would equally want to say that looking at the fact that the previous Government was proactive in establishing the ten polytechnics that we have, there is the need for consistency in terms of our evolution of education in this country, more especially when one identifies the fact that polytechnic education has been the pivot of technological advancement in most countries; and for the fact that if you look at the objectives of the Bill they are to encourage study in technical subjects at tertiary level.
Mr. Speaker, I believe that now that the Bill is before this House and finally going to be passed, it will go a long way to reduce the frustration that has engulfed our polytechnic institutions.
Mr. Speaker, I want to say that there is the need for us to give government backing to the provisions that are embedded in the Bill so that it will not be a ‘white' elephant; that we will pass this Bill with all those nice things that we expect, without the adequate provision especially of machinery and other working tools that are needed. That will not push the type of polytechnic education that we envisage for the country.
Mr. Speaker, one other factor which will have to be considered seriously is the working conditions of the staff that will be working in our polytechnics.
11.00 a.m. John
We are all aware of the agitations of the staff in our polytechnic institutions in terms of improvement in their conditions of service.
I hope that the subsequent amend- ments would especially empower the Councils to look more positively at
working conditions and other provisions that would go a long way to make our polytechnics the type of tertiary institution that we expect and its role that it would be playing in the forefront of the technological advancement of this country.
With these few words, Mr. Speaker, I want to associate myself with the motion and call on hon. Members to support it because of the avenues that it is going to give the students and, for that matter, the country in the provision of an enhanced tertiary education.
Minister of State (Mr. Kwadwo Adjei-Darko) 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to support the motion and in doing so, I want to make some brief comments.
Mr. Speaker, the Bill according to the memorandum, seeks to enable polytechnics award degrees in order to meet the current needs of employers and also bridge the gap between graduates of the polytechnics and those from the universities.
Mr. Speaker, I think we should look at this objective very critically. I do not think the objective of making polytechnics award degrees is simply to bridge the gap between polytechnic graduates and graduates who from the universities. Perhaps, it could even happen that polytechnic graduates would obtain degrees in certain areas may even be rated higher in the job industry than graduates from our normal universities, depending on what employers need.
So the idea is not to bridge the gap but to raise technical education in this country to a level where we can have the real industrial take-off, because the requisite manpower would be there.
The second point is this affiliation to
the universities. Mr. Speaker, if you look at the course content of polytechnics,
it is more practical-oriented than the academic or grammar type, so that if you want to equate or affiliate polytechnics to certain centres of excellence, we do not necessarily have to say universities but look at centres of excellence which have curricula similar to those of the polytechnics.
Otherwise, we would run the risk of, ten to fifteen years from now, all our polytechnics becoming once again the normal universities awarding normal degrees and therefore our objective of having real technical education in the country and enhancing industrialization would have been lost.
Mr. Joe Gidisu 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, on a point of order. Mr. Speaker, the hon. Colleague on the floor is misleading the House. He is a member of the Committee and he is very well informed that the affiliation we are hoping for under the Bill is not with the academic sectors as he is trying to portray; and we need to be guided by the fact that we trying to provide tech-nological advancement through the polytechnics and they may be affiliated with the necessary institutions which he terms as ‘excellence centres' and which are technologically inclined and not academically oriented. So it is not a very relevant reflection of the Bill.
Mr. Adjei-Darko 10:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, we are debating the principles, we have not done any amendment yet. And so if the hon. Member may care to look at section 2(1) - ‘polytechnics shall be affiliated to an existing accredited university'. This is what the law or the Bill is saying and it is captured in the principles. So if the Committee has proposed that an amendment should be made to it, there is nothing which stops any hon. Member from talking about it once it is still at the
‘principles' stage.
Mr. Speaker, my next point is the intake
into the polytechnics. The current practice is that a sizeable percentage of students who find themselves in the polytechnics are from the senior secondary schools (SSS). Occasionally, we may have some number also from the technical institutes. Mr. Speaker, if we really want to preserve polytechnics and have the degrees which we require for our industries, then we would also have to look at technical education very well.
Unfortunately, there are about 23 technical institutes and even there is a region Brong Ahafo Region - which has no technical institute. So perhaps, we have got to look at this critically.
Then also the SSS graduates, now that it is envisaged that the senior secondary school would be four years, perhaps all the students who find themselves in the senior secondary schools (SSS) would have to be introduced to all programmes and courses, including basic principles on technical education, so that after two years, if they choose their subjects and go into various fields, those who after the completion of SSS would want to go to polytechnics would know the fundamen- tals. So perhaps, we would have to look at even the intake into the polytechnics.
Mr. Speaker, the last point I want to raise is the idea where the Bill is trying to establish under this Act, polytechnics as public tertiary institutions. It is at the same time the policy of Government that we should encourage private participation in tertiary education delivery. So perhaps, we have got to look at this and see where we can marry the two.
Mr. H. F. Kamel (NDC -- Buem) 11:10 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I want to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the motion on the floor of the House. And in doing

so, Mr. Speaker, permit me to commend the Committee for the thorough work that they have done especially in trying to re- align certain portions of the provisions of the Bill to the general interest of the polytechnic community and polytechnic education in the country.

Mr. Speaker, my first comment relates

to paragraph 7.3 of the Committee's Report where the Committee takes exception to a provision of the Bill which states that affiliation of the polytechnics shall be by the universities. The Committee is of the view that the polytechnics should rather be affiliated to similar institutions, even if it has to do with institutions that are elsewhere. Mr. Speaker, all through the polytechnics' agitations over the years, the issue of affiliation has been at the core and the idea that polytechnics should have mentorship from the universities has been a great source of worry to most people. This is because the polytechnics have a different course of action. Their mission, their values, their curricula are quite different from the universities. So to ask the universities to provide mentorship is like asking a Moslem scholar to supervise a Christian scholar, and vice versa. So I think that the recommendation of the Committee as is contained in the Report would bring to rest this issue of affiliation and cool the hearts of those who have polytechnic education at heart.

Mr. Speaker, the other issue has to do with building the capacity and streng- thening the faculties of poly-technics.

Mr. Speaker, it is interesting to know

that somewhere like Canada, a lot of the teachers for the polytechnics usually come from the private sector, they come from industry because polytechnic education most of the time has to do with skill acquisition and knowledge and so it is

prudent that most of them should come from industry. Because these faculties have not been well built and because they have not been strengthened and the motivation for teaching staff are so low, it is very difficult to attract teachers or mentors from industry.

In Canada, for example, we have about 45 per cent of polytechnic teachers coming from industry and they share their rich experiences with the polytechnics and so the polytechnics, are able to grow and perform the roles for which they were formed.

Mr. Speaker, my other concern relates to the support institutions. Under the arrangements, we have institutions like National Council for Tertiary Education, we have National Accreditation Board and then we have NABTEX. These are institutions that together will ensure quality education, They also evaluate, assess, monitor and ensure that quality education is properly made available to the polytechnics.

Unfortunately, they have not had the much needed support. The capacity to perform their role, as stipulated under the various instruments, is quite inadequate. It is only recently that we have these institutions coming under the same arrangements and that their office accommodation is being put around Legon. Even then, vehicles for panel members of National Accreditation Board to move to do inspections for accredi- tation are still lacking. A lot of logistics are still very inadequate and so the role for which they were established does not seem to have been achieved.

Mr. Speaker, I also want to call on the polytechnic community to see how through innovation they can widen access to polytechnic education from the informal sector, especially where you have a lot of people who have acquired skills not through formal education but through the
Mr. Gidisu 11:10 a.m.
On a point of order. I am happy my other Colleague knows that he is a lawyer and cannot be talking effectively on educational issues. The HND was not

“something”; it was equally a policy taken by the Ministry; and it is the attitude of the policy implementers that has been the problem. But to be alluding to the fact that it is only now that we are having a clear-cut policy on polytechnic education is unfounded.
Mr. Speaker 11:10 a.m.
You have no point of
order, let him continue.
Capt. Effah-Dartey (Rtd): Mr. Speaker, I do not know why my good Friend is rushing to raise a point of order. I am building an argument or expressing a view, I have not reached anywhere then he stands up on point of order.
Mr. Speaker, all over the country, one point that runs across the minds of everybody, including me, is that when you hear of the word “degree” it means the person is a university graduate; it means the person has gone through a course of study and has been awarded a kind of standard that is of respect throughout the world. This is not the same with the expression “Higher National Diploma”.
I agree that the Ministry of Education or the National Council for Higher Education or whatever body may give a special definition to “Higher National Diploma”, but in the minds of the ordinary people walking the streets, Higher National Diploma cannot be equated to a degree; and this is what has created all the problems.
If you want to go into the Army or
Police for any job, so long as you have a degree and you can write your name, for instance “Nkrabea Effah-Darteh”-- LLB (Hons) beside it, -- [Interruption] -- Mr. Speaker, that alone means you are a graduate. But you cannot write your name “Kweku Boateng -- HND” what is the meaning of “HND”?
Mr. Abdul-Rashid Pelpuo 11:10 a.m.
Mr. Spea- ker, I am coming on a point of Order because the hon. Member in trying to support the Bill gave an impression that the HND is no qualification in Ghana. Let us agree that what we are doing to give autonomy and authority to the polytechnics is a great thing and must be supported, but let us not downplay the fact that HND holders are important in our economy.
Mr. Speaker 11:20 a.m.
Hon. Member for
Berekum, please continue.
Mr. Joe Amenowode 11:20 a.m.
Mr. speaker, I think my Friend, the hon. Effah-Dartey is misleading this House and the whole country. HND is not a Ghanaian creation; it is an international academic qualification
which entitles its holders to read masters degrees in some developed countries. And also the other point is that he is presenting the thing to appear as if this Bill seeks to abolish the award of HNDs in the polytechnics whereas the degree is just an additional qualification that is supposed to be obtained by the students. So the HND will still be awarded by the polytechnics.
Ms Akua Dansua 11:20 a.m.
On a point of order. Mr. Speaker, the way my hon. Colleague is speaking, it is like first he is denigrating the degree that is awarded by the polytechnic and also pointing to the fact that it is women. In other words, it is as if he is saying that it is nothing because it is only women who are getting first class in that area. I think he has to withdraw that and apologise to Ghanaian women.
Mr. Speaker 11:20 a.m.
Hon. Member for Berekum, please continue.
Capt. Effah-Darteh (rted): So, Mr. Speaker, I support this Bill and I support it fully and I call on my Colleagues to give it maximum support. The Polytechnics can
Mr. speaker 11:20 a.m.
Please, conclude.
Capt. Effah-Dartey (rted.): Let me say this, Mr. speaker. At least, it is important for the sake of the records, to say that in North Korea, at the beginning of the 1950s when they wanted to be industrious and self reliant, they asked one polytechnic institution to dismantle a tractor and try to re-assemble it -- model it and re-assemble it --
Mr. speaker, after thirty three attempts, they were able to produce a Korean tractor. I believe that really is a model for technical education and that is the purpose of setting up technical schools -- that is the essence of setting up polytechnics, and I hope and pray that all the ten polytechnics in Ghana will develop to the point where they will be awarding degrees in tech-nology-
[CAPT. EFFAH-DARTEY (RTD.)] [MR. BANDUA]
based subjects so that their products in technology issues will go over to industry and various fields of develop-ment and get our country on the march towards progress and development.
Mr. speaker, with these few words, I support the motion.
Mr. Emmanuel K. Bandua (NDC-- Biakoye) 11:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, thank you for the opportunity to contribute to the motion. Indeed, one of the main objectives of the Bill is to solve the problems that have of late been plaguing the polytechnic institutions. I believe that the Bill alone when passed into law will not on its own solve its problems unless of course the players in the Bill play their roles effectively. On this note, I will urge the Government to try and support the polytechnics financially. In fact, resources should be made available to the polytechnics so that they are able to provide facilities that are needed for effective education.
In addition to these, the allowances and moneys due polytechnic teachers must be paid to them promptly, when they are due them. In fact, this is one of the problems that have caused frequent strikes in the polytechnics . Until such a time that we are able to reward the polytechnic teachers adequately, we shall continue to have problems notwith-standing the fact that this Bill has been passed into law.
In addition to this, I will urge industries
to also support the polytechnics. In fact, they should make available opportunities for the polytechnic students to undertake in-service training in their various institutions. It is on this basis that they will be able to acquire the necessary skills that will enable them to perform efficiently when they come out of these institutions as graduates.
Finally, I will urge Ghanaians to give recognition to polytechnics. In fact, if we recognize them and accord them the respect that is due them, I think that they will be able to perform. The polytechnic students should also be able to take their lessons very seriously and when they are able to come out and perform efficiently on the job market, I think society will recognize their effort.
With these few words Mr. speaker, I
beg to support the motion.
Mr. Samuel K. Adu-Gyamfi (NPP -- Aowin) 11:20 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I wish to support the debate on the Polytechnic Bill.
Mr. Speaker, looking around the country, we have seen that a lot of technical jobs are not taken by people because technical education was left in the background. It is very important today that this Bill is being debated. I wish to support the Bill and say that the Government should try to resource polytechnics for staff development . If the polytechnics are just upgraded without requisite staff training, then the upgrading will not be meaningful.
I also wish to suggest that there should be effective advisory committees to work hand-in-hand with the polytechnics. These committees should have repre-sentatives from industry so that the curriculum that would be designed by the polytechnics will be a convenient curriculum so that they will produce employable graduates.
I also want to say that there should be effective corporate learning so that the students of the polytechnics will have enough industrial attachment to gain the practical experience that will be convenient for the polytechnic student to be technologically awarded the degree.
When you go to South Africa you
see that they have a system where the corporate learning is doing very good work for the polytechnic student. Students are sent to industry and the industry embraces them, monitors their learning and then grades them in addition to what the university or the polytechnics would also award. In doing this, I think the graduate will be well prepared to enhance efficiency at the place of work.
With these few words, I support the Bill and I call on hon. Members to also support it.
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu (NDC Tamale South) 11:30 a.m.
Thank you Mr. Speaker, for the opportunity to associate myself with the Second Reading of the Polytechnics Bill. And in doing so, I would rather want to approach this with a concern.
Mr. Speaker, if you read page 1 of your Committee's Report, it gives an indication that this Bill was laid before this House as far back as 15th December, 2005; and for the House to be looking at it in February 2007 leaves much to be desired. Mr. Speaker, I do not think that we should go on commending the Committee.
Mr. S. K. B. Manu 11:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the hon. Member is creating an erroneous impression, that the Committee did not work well enough and kept the Bill from 2005 till this time. Mr. Speaker, the person “Balado,” who is the Chairman of the Committee is never associated with mediocrity. I believe that whatever is worth doing is worth doing well. So we needed time to study other systems elsewhere to enrich our system so that
polytechnic graduates from Ghana would compare favourably, if not more favourably, with any other graduates of polytechnic institutions the world over. That was why we took time, pains, to come out with this Report and not that we were sleeping over the work. We were painstakingly doing the work and that is why we are now bringing it out.
Mr. Iddrisu 11:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, as Chairman of the Committee, he was free to indicate and explain what might have delayed the bringing back to this House of a Bill which had been lying at committee level for 14 solid months. In my view, it is an unduly long period for any Bill and for that purpose.
But Mr. Speaker, coming to it, I think that it is important that this House takes particular interest in this Bill for three or four important reasons. One, the relationship between the polytechnics and the universities on one hand, and the relationship between the polytechnics and industry; and also to deal with two vexed issues the issue of the status of the Higher National Diploma, and finally, the issue about progression. Mr. Speaker, I would like to begin with the issue of progression.
Mr. Speaker, just to give a conservative demonstration of it, if a student went through the Higher National Diploma, for instance in Marketing, we all know that internationally in studying marketing if there are experts in marketing here you normally would specialize in the four- related “Ps” for that purpose, even for HND or for a degree.
If you were to study accounting, you are likely to concentrate on the concept of debit the receiver, credit the giver, whether at the polytechnic or the university.
But Mr. Speaker, it is worrying that having gone through this to obtain an HND many of our polytechnic graduates have no clear-cut routes in terms of
Mr. S. K. B. Manu 11:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the hon. Member has not read the Bill conscientiously and therefore is mis- leading this House. Mr. Speaker, the Bill is saying that if you read Marketing in the polytechnic, you could continue to get your degree in Marketing without having to go to Legon or any of the universities. In fact, that is the essence of upgrading the polytechnic institutions to that status where they can award their own degrees.
So there is no need for that student to go back to Legon to seek to read Marketing there. If he does that and he meets any hurdle over there it would be his own creation.
Mr. Iddrisu 11:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I have in my possession here “Governance of Tertiary Educational Institutions in Ghana,” a manual, edited by Paul Effah and Rita J.A.N. Mensah-Bonsu. And many of the views that I am articulating I will soon make reference to very reliable research work on polytechnic education. It will interest the Chairman, if I had opportunity to ask him about this HNC student who has already completed Marketing. I am aware that about only two polytechnics - the Ho Polytechnic in particular has started degree courses.
Many of them have not started degree courses. So what happens to those who have HND and want to continue at degree level? Certainly, we must be able to
create opportunity for them to be able to progress. That is why I am calling for a strengthening of the relationship between polytechnics and universities in order to address the issue of progression.
Mr. Speaker, related to the progression is the issue of funding which an hon. Colleague has already raised. Mr. Speaker, if you take a the polytechnics, for instance, you take Koforidua Polytechnic, Wa Polytechnic or Bolgatanga Polytechnic, you cannot compare their infrastructural development to that of Accra Polytechnic or Takoradi Polytechnic or Kumasi Polytechnic. So again, it raises questions that when this House gets opportunity to approve the GETFund, in terms of allocations to tertiary institutions we must take particular interest in resourcing what I will call “the deprived or under privileged tertiary institutions by way of poly-technics elsewhere,” so that they will be able to cope in terms of expanding numbers. Mr. Speaker, if you take --
Mr. Manu 11:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, the hon. Member has not looked at the Bill carefully. Mr. Speaker, what he is describing is what is called elsewhere, “Relocation of Courses.” Mr. Speaker, given the thin resources that we have in the country, the best way to solve that problem he is describing is to re-allocate courses. Instead of spreading thinly our resources, we can designate polytechnics to read certain course. For example, Engineering would be done in Kumasi Polytechnic, Marketing and others would be done in a named polytechnic. In that case, we concentrate our resources at a particular place and in a particular institution.
Other than that, given our national purse we may not be able to resource the polytechnics equitably in order for them to deliver the kind of quality education that we want.
Mr. Iddrisu 11:30 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I was
only saying that we should balance the allocation of resources in order to ensure that the most deprived polytechnics would be able to keep pace with the superior development. Maybe, I should take him down memory lane. He would remember that until 1996 we had the polytechnic largely running non-degree courses. It was based on the Govern-ment's White Paper of 1991 which then established the Sunyani and Koforidua Polytechnics.
So essentially, they are not expected to be at the same standing as compared to Accra Polytechnic or Kumasi Polytechnic. Subsequently, we have had three (3) other polytechnics join the stream -- Wa Polytechnic, Bolgatanga Poly-technic and others, and I think that infrastructure- wise we must be seen, because we want to expand assets. Even if you take any of the polytechnics today, whether Accra Polytechnic or Kumasi Polytechnic, in terms of numbers they admit more students than pertains in Wa Polytechnic or in Bolgatanga Polytechnic.
So all that I am saying is that, let us finance them adequately so that they would be able to increase their numbers in terms of admission and be able to run their courses properly.
Mr. Speaker, I am told by some information available to me from the National Council for Tertiary Education that even if we were to do a comparison, the unit cost for training of a polytechnic graduate may be around $2,500, conservatively; Government provides less than US$500 for that purpose. It means that there is shortfall of about $2,000 in terms of what is needed for the effective and proper training of any polytechnic graduate.
Mr. Iddrisu 11:40 a.m.
I can say the same thing for the
university graduates. So when the hon. Member raised the issue of funding, I thought it was an important issue we must address. When people talk about quality of higher education declining, it is declining because government does not make resources commensurate with the number of students who are admitted for the purpose of either university or polytechnic education.

Mr. Speaker, may I now commend the Committee for its hindsight in recommending strongly that polytechnics should not necessarily be affiliated with universities in particular but with tertiary institutions. With that, Mr. Speaker, I refer you to page 7, second paragraph of your Committee's Report.
Mr. Adjei-Darko 11:40 a.m.
On a point of order. Mr. Speaker, I want to be clear about what the hon. Member said. He said that, as he listened to my contribution, he had the impression that -- He used the words “many of us” because I raised exactly the same point that we should not in any way try to equate a polytechnic degree with a university degree. We should leave it to
Mr. Adjei-Darko 11:40 a.m.


industries. Perhaps, even a polytechnic graduate will have much higher salary than someone who has read B.A Political Science because in the line of production, the industry will find that polytechnic graduate more productive than the B.A. Political Science. That is what I said. So I do not know, the way he put it , it looks as if I am included in the “many of us” and so I want him to correct it.
Mr. Haruna Iddrisu 11:40 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, since the hon. Member has said that his earlier position is the same as mine, I am wondering why he would categorise himself under those people I have categorised as being confused. But that notwithstanding, I was making a point about the issue of funding for the polytechnics and I think it is important that this House takes an interest.
I gave the example of what is normally required and then the shortfall. It is the same thing even when we come to our public universities. If Government is required to give $3000 per unit cost for the training of the students, government normally gives below $800, and that is what is affecting the quality of higher education in our country.
But Mr. Speaker, finally, like I reiterated earlier, I just think that in passing this Bill, we must be conscious of four important issues. One, how do we strengthen the relationships between the polytechnics and industries? That is why we have the affiliation of polytechnic students to industries for the purpose of learning there. We also must address, not necessarily through legislation, the issue of the status and progression of the polytechnic students; and finally, making sure that there is adequate funding for them.
Mr. Speaker 11:40 a.m.
You may wish to conclude.
Mr. Iddrisu 11:40 a.m.
Rightly so, Mr. Speaker. It has to do with the conditions of service and schemes available to POTA or members of the Polytechnic Teachers of Ghana. If Government takes a holistic approach and is able to normalise it, I am sure we will begin to have sanity and some normalcy in our polytechnics for a longer period of time. We need to re-look at their conditions of service, in particular, issues about their allowances.
Mr. Oppey Abbey (NDC-Awutu- Senya) 11:40 a.m.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for the opportunity to contribute to the motion on the floor.
Mr. Speaker, it is gratifying to note that this Bill seeks to solve some of the problems of the polytechnics. Mr. Speaker, the polytechnics are there to play the role of training technologists and technicians. They have played this role over the years. We all know that education is key to any development in any country but then we as a nation are treating education as an end in itself. Why am I saying so? We have trained scientists, engineers and technicians, but when it comes to solving technological problems, we do not look internally, we look outside for solution of the problems.
Why are we training our scientists? Why are we training our technologists? We have energy crisis now; what are we doing? We go overseas for solutions. Why are we not challenging our engineers at the universities? Why are we not challenging the technicians at the polytechnics. Let us take some of the problems to the polytechnics so that they can solve them
for us. As a nation, we are behaving like somebody who has trained his son to be a carpenter yet when his dining hall table gets broken, he goes outside for a carpenter to come and solve his problem for him. Why are we not looking inside for help? I suggest that we take some of the energy problems to the universities and the polytechnics for them to solve. They have their world class technicians. You go outside, we have Ghanaian engineers, Ghanaian scientists solving problems outside. Let us take these problems to them.
With these few words, I support the motion on the floor.
Deputy Minister for Education, Science and Sports (Mrs. A. Baiden- Amissah): Mr. Speaker, all concerns raised have been taken care of. The Polytechnic Bill seeks to provide hands on technical and vocational training that enable the trainees to acquire their own careers so that they can take care of themselves and their nation. They are trained according to their own capabilities and their aptitudes. Some of the concerns raised as regards curriculum - Hon. Members are saying that it must be geared towards industry. Yes, the curriculum has been revised and is geared towards industrial needs.
Two polytechnics have been upgraded to degree awarding institutions. They are the Ho Polytechnic and Accra Polytechnic. It is being done gradually. So we have started with two and as we move ahead, we would see which ones also to rope in to start the degree course.
As regards the finances of polytechnics, in fact, in this year's budgetary allocation all technical and vocational training institutions are taking the chunk of it because we have realised that they actually
need a good start, and this is the reason why most part of the budget is going to their training in technical and vocational aspects. If I say “technical” I mean science is part of the technical.
Mr. Iddrisu 11:40 a.m.
On a point of order. The hon. Member speaking is associated with the Ministry of Education, Science and Sports and she has made a statement for the records. If we do not correct it, it would send a wrong signal. She said that we have graded two of the polytechnics. That undermines the academic autonomy of the polytechnics. And when she says “we have” in what capacity? Is it the polytechnic which is to upgrade itself or a ministerial executive power. I think that it is the National Accreditation Board. She should use the right words so that people do not get the impression that Government decides which polytechnics at what time should be awarded a degree status.
Mrs. Angelina Baiden-Amissah 11:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I am part of the Government so if I say “we” I am talking about the Government. If he wants it this way then let me say “Government” because the National Accreditation Board thinks of what to do and they bring it to the Ministry of Education, Science and Sports and it is the Government that agrees as to what they want. So let me say the Government through the National Accreditation Board.
Mr. Speaker 11:50 a.m.
Hon. Members, item 7 - Committee Sittings.
Mr. Felix Owusu-Adjapong 11:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, as was indicated in the Business
Ms. Akua Dansua 11:50 a.m.
Mr. Speaker, I beg to second the motion.
Question put and motion agreed to.
ADJOURNMENT 11:50 a.m.

  • [MR. EDUMADZE
  • TABLE HERE 10 a.m.

  • [MR. EDUMADZE [MR. EDUMADZE