Debates of 19 Mar 2013

MR SPEAKER
PRAYERS 11:10 a.m.

ANNOUNCEMENTS 11:10 a.m.

Mr Speaker 11:10 a.m.
Hon Members, communication from His Excellency the President.
“15th March, 2013
RT. HON SPEAKER
OFFICE OF THE PARLIAMENT 11:10 a.m.

STATE HOUSE 11:10 a.m.

OSU-ACCRA 11:10 a.m.

Ministers-designate 11:10 a.m.
1. Dominic Akuritinga Ayine -- Ministry of Justice and Attorney- General's Department;
2. Barbara Serwaa Asamoah -- Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources;
3. Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa -- Ministry of Education; and
4. Felix Kwakye Ofosu -- Ministry of Information and Media Relations.
Kindly accept, Rt. Hon, the assurances of my highest consideration.
(Sgd.) JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA
PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC 11:10 a.m.

Mr Dan Botwe 11:10 a.m.
Mr Speaker, when Members of Parliament hear the nominations through the media so many days before we receive official communication -- I would want your guidance on it.
Again, also for you to confirm whether this communication is from the Jubilee House, Jubilee Flagstaff House -- [Interruptions] -- or wherever it is coming from and then the date of the communication.
It is important that Hon Members are reassured that after Mr Speaker has given this message, no other communication would come where we would need the Minister for Information and Media Relations to come and confirm or deny; it is important, Mr Speaker.
Mr Speaker 11:10 a.m.
Hon Members, really, I do not know, but communication to the House comes from the President and that is what comes to me; what happens in the media, I do not know. This letter dated 15th March, 2013 was received in my office yesterday -- the received stamp indicates that it was received yesterday.
Mr Mahama Ayariga 11:10 a.m.
Mr Speaker, I think as far back as when the Hon Member was Minister for Information and there was no “Media Relations” added to his designation, it was the practice then, that appointment of Ministers and Deputy Ministers would go to the media at the same time that it was being communicated to the House.
So, I really fail to understand why all of a sudden he thinks that it is a strange practice to hear in the media first, that, somebody has been nominated for appointment to any position and then subsequently to come to this House and be communicated to formally by Mr Speaker -- the information that has come from the Presidency.
Mr Speaker, for the avoidance of doubt, the communication came from the Flagstaff House and not any Jubilee Flagstaff House.
Mr Speaker 11:10 a.m.
Hon Minister, that is not for you to respond to; whether from Flagstaff House or Jubilee Flagstaff House, that is not for you to respond to.
Hon Members, I am not taking any further comment on the matter.
Hon Members, the only reason I called the Hon Minister was because the Hon Minority Chief Whip spoke and I thought it would be fair to call one person from the Majority and I think the matter ends there.
Hon Members, I refer the nomination to the Appointments Committee for consideration and report to the House.
Hon Members, I have the pleasure to introduce to you members of the Executive Committee of the African Network of Parliamentarians on the millennium challenge goals, who are on a-day official visit to Ghana.
They are here to hold a meeting on the activities of the Network and have found it necessary to visit and interact with us.
They are:
Senator Morgen Komichi -- Zimbabwe
Hon Henry Bayenzaki -- Uganda
Hon Ntoitha Mmithiaru -- Kenya
Hon Anthonio Niguice -- Mozam- bique
Hon Eucharia Azodo -- Nigeria
Mr Hilary Ogbonna -- UN Millennium Campaign
Ms Nardos Hagos -- UN Millennium Campaign
Hon Rose Abunaw Makia -- Cameroun
Mr Charles Abugre -- UN Millennium Campaign.
Hon Members, on your behalf, I wish them a pleasant stay in the country and fruitful deliberations.
VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS AND THE OFFICIAL REPORT 11:20 a.m.

  • [No correction was made to the Votes and Proceedings of Monday, 18th March, 2013.]
  • [No correction was made to the Official Report of Tuesday, 5th March, 2013]
  • Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Hon Members, we also have the Official Report of Tuesday, 12th March, 2013 for correction.
    Ms Ursula G. Owusu 11:20 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, column 1489, paragraph 2, the last line, the word is “clueless” but it said “ruleless.”
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Very well.
    Mr Patrick Y. Boamah 11:20 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, column 1444, paragraph 4, the banter between you and Hon Joe Ghartey -- “An Hon Member…” I do not know what that means, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    I have seen the column
    1444 --
    Mr Boamah 11:20 a.m.
    Paragraph 4, it starts with “An Hon Member . . .” and I do not exactly understand why those words are there.
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Well, I have taken note of it, I will discuss it with the Clerk. Normally, the Hansard Department is supposed to capture everything, but if you do not speak into the microphone, then I do not know whether you have to be recognised and reported. So, you have raised an issue which I would discuss with the Clerk and see how it should be captured.
    Dr Richard W. Anane 11:20 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, column 1439, the fourth line from above, the word is “peri-abortion.” I know I said postpartum. So, maybe, it just went along for them to record “pre-partum.” It is “peri-abortion hemorrhage” instead of “pre-partum.”
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Which word did you use?
    Dr Anane 11:20 a.m.
    “Peri-abortion” instead of “pre-partum.”
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Very well.
    Any other correction, Hon Members?
    Dr Mark Assibey-Yeboah 11:20 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, column 1424, I said, “Mr Speaker, instead of presenting a job creation budget, we were presented with a jobs-killing budget”
    -- 11:20 a.m.

    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Column 1424, which paragraph?
    Dr Assibey-Yeboah 11:20 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, third paragraph. What we actually got is “a jobs-killing budget,” not “a job scaling.”
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    All right. [Pause]
    Hon Members, in the absence of further corrections, the Official Report of Tuesday, 12th March, 2013 as corrected is hereby adopted as the true record of proceedings.
  • [No correction was made to the Official Report of Wednesday, 13th March, 2013.
  • Dr Anthony A. Osei 11:20 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, the other day, a matter came up and we had a discussion on the floor of this House --
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Are you making a Statement?
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:20 a.m.
    No! Mr Speaker, I am trying to bring your attention to a matter which I need your guidance on.
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Ordinarily, the rules are not in our favour but I would be flexible to you.
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:20 a.m.
    Thank you.
    Mr Speaker, I recall you said that you were referring the matter to the Leadership to discuss. I do not know whether the Leadership has met or not. But sub- sequently, I have come across some other matters that may affect the work of this House. I do not want to go into the details now --
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Hon Member, I would suggest that you meet with the leadership tomorrow morning.
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:20 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is urgent enough that we may have to meet today. It is serious enough --
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Hon Member, you see, that is why we have Leaders of the House and that is why the Leaders meet the Speaker every morning. So, if you feel
    strongly that there is an issue that would affect the business of the House, you normally channel it through your Leaders, or see the Speaker in his Lobby before he enters the Chamber. But now that we are here, how can we immediately resolve the issue or your concern?
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:20 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am not asking you to resolve the issue. I did not even get the chance to meet my Leader this morning. This is because I had a meeting and that is why I am seeking your guidance because it is --
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Well, I would suggest that when I leave the Chair, let us meet together with the Hon Majority Leader and the Hon Minority Leader, so that we can look at the issue.
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:20 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thank you.
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Thank you very much, Hon Member for Old Tafo.
    Hon Members, at the Commencement of Public Business -- Presentation of Papers -- Hon Majority Leader?
    Dr Benjamin B. Kunbuor 11:20 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, we can take item 4(b), (d), (e), (m) and (q) and subsequently, the Motions.
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    Very well.
    PAPERS 11:30 a.m.

    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Item 4(q) -- By the Chairman of the Committee -- Committee on Youth, Sports and Culture --
    rose
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Asiamah --
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, this is strange; my Hon Chairman knows that we have not discussed anything on the -- we have not even met. We have not even met; so, how can he produce -- ask him; we have not even met -- [Interruption.]
    Mr Kobena M. Woyome 11:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I do not know what he is referring to; we are referring to Chieftaincy --
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Members, let there be some order in the House.
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    But we need to discuss that one first.
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Chairman of the Committee, has your Committee met?
    Mr Woyome 11:30 a.m.
    Yes, we met and he was there. So, I do not know what he is referring to. And the Report is ready for Chieftaincy and Traditional Affairs. What we have not done is the one for Youth and Sports -- that is what we are yet to look at. That is what we have not met on because of the delayed estimates to the House. So, I do not know what he is referring to.
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Members, let us have some order in the House. The Hon Ranking Member has raised an issue and I think that it is a legitimate one. If the Committee has not actually met, then there would not be any Paper to be laid. Let us find out the true position, then we would know whether we would have the Paper laid or not.
    Now, he is explaining that they have met on the estimates for Chieftaincy but not that of Youth and Sports and that is what has been captured in item 4 (q) that Ministry of Chieftaincy and Traditional Affairs -- He is saying that they have met on that one and the Hon Ranking Member, Hon Asiamah was present.
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, yesterday, I even met him and said that we needed to go through the Chieftaincy issue again and he told me that --
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    So please, have you met on the Ministry of Chieftaincy and Traditional Affairs? -- [Interruption]
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    There is no report that has to be discussed.
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Member, you see, I got alarmed when you said that the Committee had not even met. Now, it is turning out that they have met on Chieftaincy. So, I am asking, one by one; so, have you met on Chieftaincy and Traditional Affairs?
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    On Chieftaincy but not on Youth and Sports. That is the point -- [Interruption] -- No, please; we have not even started the report. As a Ranking Member, I have not sighted the Report; nothing has come to me -- [Interruption] -- So, how can he go ahead and lay the Report and he knows the tradition of this House.
    Even yesterday, we met and discussed it; he said he was going to show me the report. But Mr Speaker, you know the tradition of this House. We need to discuss it before it is laid; you know it.
    Mr Speaker, you know I am a veteran in this whole business. It is the ninth time I am doing this business; so, he knows it.
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    If you are a veteran, how would you describe the Hon Member for Suame? [Laughter.]
    Mr Woyome 11:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, we met and took all decisions and in fact, I do not think we have any problem with Chieftaincy and Traditional Affairs. What we are currently faced with, is the delayed estimates on the Ministry of --
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Members, if there is --
    rose
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Chairman, you need to work with your Hon Ranking Member, so that as much as possible, if there are any grey areas or any areas of conflict, they can be resolved.
    Yes, Hon Member for Akwatia --
    Mr M.B.J. Ahmed 11:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am a member of the Committee and when we met, the Hon Ranking Member, halfway into the meeting, excused us and left. So, he did not finish with the meeting. So, I am surprised he is coming here to say we did not meet. We met, we completed everything on Chieftaincy and Traditional Affairs and we are done with that. So, for him to come here and say -- [Interruption] -- He did not even sit to finish with the meeting. Halfway, he left.
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, he is a novice in this game, so, he should understand me. [Interruption.] He is a novice.
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Member, withdraw the word “novice”.
    Mr I. K.Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, he is a newcomer; he should learn the tradition of this House.
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Absolutely.
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    You ruled accordingly, you know the tradition. You have been here; you are the father of this House so to speak. Mr Speaker, you know this that is why you ruled that we should consult. My legitimate concern is that, as Hon Ranking Member, I need to see the Report before it is laid. He should please, educate himself well, get familiar with the practice of this House and the norms --
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Member, to be very fair to the House, you started by saying that the Committee did not meet at all. Now, when you were explaining, you shifted to say that it is not that they did not meet, they met on Chieftaincy and Traditional Affairs but you have not seen the Report. You see --
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    My concern was that, normally, after deliberations, we meet to go through the report before -- he
    knows it; that is the tradition. We go through the draft report.
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Is it true that you left?
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker -- [Laughter.]
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Ranking Member, is it true that you excused the Committee and left? This is because in your absence, it could be that those who were present confirmed everything; you see --
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I went to the washroom, when I came back, they had finished -- [Interruption] -- and he knows it.
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Members, we would defer for some few minutes. Let the Hon Chairman and the Hon Ranking Member put their heads together and then advise the Chair. But then, Hon Ranking Member, next time you are raising a point, you should be very candid with the House.
    Mr I. K. Asiamah 11:30 a.m.
    My concern is that, normally, after the deliberations, you need to go through the draft report. So, I was referring to the draft report, that we had not met on it. So, that is it.
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Members, I will defer the laying of the Report for some few minutes. Hon Chairman, you just do the necessary consultation and come back and let us have the Paper laid. We do not have time.
    Several Hon Members -- rose --
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Hon Members, I have already ruled. If anybody disagrees with my ruling, they know what to do.
    Hon Members, let us make progress. Any time you are done with the consultation, I will suspend whatever we are doing and have the Paper laid.
    Hon Majority Leader, what Motions are ready for us to take?
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    All right.
    Hon Members, item number 5 on the Order Paper --
    MOTIONS 11:40 a.m.

    Chairman of the Committee (Mr James K. Avedzi) 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this Honourable House adopts the Report of the Finance Committee on the Amendment to the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on the reform of the Executive Board and the increase in quotas of member countries.
    Mr Speaker, in doing so, I present your Committee's Report.
    Introduction
    The ratification of the amendment to the Articles of Agreement on reform of the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and increase in quotas of member countries was laid in the House on Friday, 1st March, 2013 and referred to the Finance Committee for consideration and report in accordance with article 75 of the 1992 Constitution of Ghana and Order 169 of the Standing Orders of the House.
    The Committee met and considered the amendment to the Articles of Agreement with the Hon Minister for Finance, Mr. Seth E. Terkpeh and officials from the Ministry of Finance and hereby, presents this Report to the House pursuant to Order

    161(1) of the Standing Orders of the House.

    Reference documents

    The following documents served as reference guide during the Committee's deliberations:

    1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana.

    Standing Orders of the House.

    Memorandum on the ratification of the Amendment to the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on reform of the Executive Board and the increase in quotas of member countries.

    Articles of Agreement on reform of the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and increase in quotas of member countries.

    Background to the review of quotas

    In its discussions on the Fourteenth General Review of quotas, the Executive Board assessed the Fund's need for resources over the medium-term in order to carry out its functions. The Executive Board stressed the need for the Fund to remain a quota-based institution, notwithstanding the recent large increase in its borrowed resources.

    The Executive Board further noted that a range of indicators show that the relative size of the Fund has declined substantially since the last general quota increase 12 years ago and recognised that the distribution of quota shares should reflect the relative weights of the Fund's members in the world economy, which have changed substantially in view of the

    strong growth in dynamic emerging market and developing countries (EMDCs).

    In addition, recent events have highlighted the fact that global financial crisis can have broad dimensions, potentially affecting a wide group of member countries, while the recent reforms of the Fund's facilities could potentially expand the range of members that may seek the Fund's support in the future.

    Given these considerations, the Executive Board proposed to the Governors that the total of Fund quotas agreed in the context of the 2008 quota and voice reform be increased by 100 per cent from approximately SDR 238.4 billion to approximately SDR 476.8 billion.

    To give effect to the above, the Board of Governors of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved a package of far-reaching reforms of the Fund's quotas and governance on 15th December, 2010. These reforms represent a major re- alignment in the ranking of quota shares that better reflect global economic realities, and to further strengthen the Fund's legitimacy and effectiveness.

    The Board of Governors also supported an amendment to the Articles of Agreement that would facilitate a move to a more representative, all-elected Executive Board.

    Purpose of the reforms

    The purpose of the reforms is to re- align the ranking of quota shares to better reflect global economic realities, and a strengthening of the Fund's legitimacy and effectiveness. It also completes the 14th General Review of Quotas with an unprecedented doubling of quotas and a major realignment of quota shares -- a shift of more than 6 per cent for over-

    represented to under-represented members and, a more than 6 per cent quota shift to dynamic emerging market and developing countries. The reforms also protect the quota shares and voting power of poor members.

    Observations

    The Committee made the following observations during its deliberations:

    Current position of the proposed amendment and justification for Government action

    The Committee noted that in order for the proposed amendment on reform of the Executive Board to enter into force, acceptance by three-fifths (3/5) of the Fund's 188 members (or 113 members) having 85 per cent of the Fund's total voting power is required. As of March 1, 2013, 133 members having 70.82 per cent of total voting power had accepted the amendment.

    For the quota increases under the 14th General Review of Quotas to become effective, the entry into force of the proposed amendment to reform the Executive Board is required, as well as the consent to the quota increase by members having not less than 70 per cent of total quotas (as of November 5, 2010). As of March 1, 2013, 148 members having 77.42 per cent of total quota had consented.

    Therefore, since the amendments effectively constitute a modification to an existing international law, it is necessary that appropriate domestic legal steps are taken to make the acceptance effective, and this requires the prior consent of Cabinet and ratification by Parliament.

    Financial implications and benefits to Ghana

    The Committee observed that the ratification of the Agreement does not impose any immediate financial obligation on Ghana.

    The Committee was however, informed that the 14th General Review of Quotas which doubled the quotas and realigned the quota shares of member countries would mean that Ghana's current contribution to the Fund will double. This also means that Ghana would be entitled to access more credit of about US$738 million as compared to the current figure of US$369 million.

    Ghana's constituency in the IMF

    The Committee was informed that though Ghana functionally operates within the African Department of the IMF, it is currently in the constituency of the North African and Asian countries, namely the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Algeria, Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Morocco, Egypt and Tunisia. This situation denies Ghana the opportunity to serve on the Executive Board of the Fund where major decisions are made.

    The Committee however, calls on the Government to analyse the benefits or otherwise of Ghana's position in this constituency. This will enable Government to decide on whether to remain or leave the current constituency.

    Conclusion and recommendation

    The Committee, having carefully examined the amendments, noted that they are consistent with the 1992 Constitution and accordingly recommends that the House adopts its Report and ratifies by Resolution, the proposed amendments to the Articles to the Agreement on the reforms of the Executive Board of the IMF and the increase in quotas of member countries in accordance with article 75(2) of the Constitution.

    Respectfully submitted.
    Dr Anthony A. Osei(NPP -- Old Tafo) 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to second the Motion and in so doing, I would want to bring Hon Members, attention to your Committee's Report on pages 3 and 4 about the observations.
    Mr Speaker, on page 4, the Committee observed that the ratification of the Agreement does not impose any immediate financial obligation on Ghana. Mr Speaker, the Committee was however informed that the 14th January review of quotas has doubled quotas and realigned the quotas shares, so that our current share, which was US$369, by this ratification, will go up to US$738; so that when we want to borrow, we have up to that ceiling.
    Mr Speaker, the more important thing is on the next observation. By a historical accident, when Ghana joined the Fund, we found ourselves in a constituency which consists of North African nations and Asian countries including Afghanistan, Algeria, Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Morocco, Egypt and Tunisia.
    Mr Speaker, at that time, not too many African countries had joined, so, we thought that it was strategic to locate ourselves in this constituency. And for your information, one of our former directors, the late Amon Nii Quaye became an Executive Director. But times have changed and we still find ourselves in this constituency.
    Mr Speaker, the Committee is inviting Government to take a relook at this position, to ask whether or not -- where we are currently located is strategic to us.
    Mr Speaker, Liberia and Sierra Leone, which find themselves in an African constituency, have become Executive Directors -- and look at the time we joined. Now, the best we have is an advisor in the office of the Executive Director -- an adviser. Mr Speaker, by
    the way, this position also affects our constituency in the World Bank. A nation like Ghana should be looking towards being an Executive Director, not an adviser in the office of the Executive Director.
    So, I think that we invite the Government to seriously examine the position. Not that I have anything against these so-called North African and Asian countries -- they can stay there for operational purposes anyway, while Ghana is considered under the African division.
    So, it is a bit odd and it is about time Government relooked at this constituency and saw if it would not be better in our interest to shift constituencies, so that our esteemed Minister for Finance or somebody can be found to become an Executive Director, because the Executive Directors take the important decisions.
    But that notwithstanding, Mr Speaker, the previous -- Usually, we have found that the Iranian Executive Directors have been very, very good to us. But it should not be personalised because we had a personal relationship.
    With those few words, I urge all my Hon Colleagues to approve the Motion.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    RESOLUTIONS 11:40 a.m.

    Minister for Finance (Mr Seth E. Terkpeh) 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that
    WHEREAS by the provisions of article 75 of the Constitution any treaty, Agreement, or Convention executed by or under the authority
    of the President in the name of Ghana is made subject to ratification either by an Act of Parliament or by a Resolution of Parliament, supported by the votes of more than one-half of all the Members of Parliament.
    IN ACCORDANCE with the said article 75 of the Constitution, the President has caused to be laid before Parliament, through the Minister responsible for Finance, the amendment to the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on the reform of the Executive Board and the increase in quotas of member countries on 1st March, 2013.
    NOW THEREFORE, this Honour- able House hereby resolves to ratify the said amendment to the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on the reform of the Executive Board and the increase in quotas of member countries.
    Papa Owusu-Ankomah 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I know the Chairman was going to support the Resolution. I intend supporting, but I was hoping that at least, the Hon Minister would make some comments about the recommendations the Committee made about the location of Ghana in the scheme of things within the IMF and the World Bank. I thought probably, that matter would have been raised in the Committee's report before he moved the Resolution.
    Mr Speaker 11:40 a.m.
    Hon Minister, you have moved the Resolution, but they want you to respond if you can, the issue raised by the Hon Ranking Member; that is the request and I think it is a legitimate request
    -- 11:40 a.m.

    rose
    Mr Speaker 11:40 a.m.
    No! You have already spoken. No, Hon Member, we have finished and he thinks that he should take advantage of moving the Resolution to respond to the issues. Do you want to add more issues?
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, he said Resolution numbered 6. I do not see any resolution numbered 6. It is item number 6, which is a Resolution.
    Mr Speaker 11:40 a.m.
    Hon Member for Old Tafo, you know you are a senior Member of this House?
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thought the only senior Member was the Speaker. There are more senior Members including your goodself.
    Mr Terkpeh 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, the issue raised by the Ranking Member is very important and I was in Committee when it was discussed. I only thought that it had reflected the sentiments of --
    Mr Speaker 11:40 a.m.
    This is a matter on the floor of the House. And therefore, the Hansard would capture his concerns. What is your response to it, if any?
    Mr Terkpeh 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, my response is that the recommendation of the Committee, that this issue should be analysed, would be brought to the attention of His Excellency the President, so that it can be discussed in an appropriate forum and a decision taken on it. Mr Speaker, this is an issue that has engaged past Governments and the present one. Indeed, we discussed this issue when the quota issue came up and so, the sentiments expressed in Committee and on the floor of the House are things which are under consideration at the moment.
    Mr Speaker 11:40 a.m.
    Who is seconding the Resolution -- I thought the Hon Member for Sekondi was going to second it.
    Papa Owusu-Ankomah 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to second the Motion.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Resolved accordingly.
    Alhaji Mohammed-Mubarak Muntaka 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, item 13 as appeared on the Order Paper, page 6.
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    Is the Local Government and Rural Development Motion not ready?
    Alhaji Muntaka 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Minister for Finance has a lot of outstanding issues, so, we felt that since he is in the Chamber, we should --
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    Very well.
    Thank you.
    Hon Members, item number 13 on the Order Paper -- Minister for Finance.
    CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL 11:50 a.m.

    Minister for Finance (Mr Seth E. Terkpeh) 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢8,994, 734 for the services of the National Development Planning Commission (NDPC) for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    Hon Minister, you would not tell us anything?
    Mr Terkpeh 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, the expenditure for which we are seeking the approval of the House is for the efficient running of the National Development Planning Commission (NDPC).
    Mr Speaker, the Commission has an enormous responsibility this year, of leading the nation into the preparation of the next medium-term plan and therefore, it is -- And in doing this, it will be liaising with the Ministry of Finance as well as other agencies of Government and in particular, all the Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) in reviewing their strategic plans in order that we can evolve a new medium-term plan.
    It is against this background that the appropriation is being sought from the House.
    Question proposed.
    Chairman of the Finance Committee (Mr James K. Avedzi) 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to present your Committee's Report.
    Introduction
    The Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government of Ghana for the year ending 31st December, 2013 was presented to the House by the Hon Minister for Finance, Mr Seth Terkpeh, on Tuesday, 5th March, 2013; and further to article 179 of the Constitution and Order 140 (4) of the Standing Orders of the House, the 2013 Annual Estimates of the National Development Planning Commission (NDPC) were referred to the Finance Committee for consideration and report.
    The Committee subsequently met with the Hon Minister for Finance, Mr Seth Terkpeh, the Director-General of the NDPC, Mrs Regina O. Adutwum and a technical team from the Commission and the Ministry of Finance to consider the estimates and hereby presents this Report.
    Background
    The National Development Planning Commission (NDPC) exists to advise the President of the Republic of Ghana on national development planning policy and strategy by providing a national development policy framework and ensuring that strategies and programmes are effectively carried out for the accelerated development of the country, which will provide continuous improvement in the living standards of all Ghanaians.
    Objectives
    The objectives of the Commission as derived from the Medium-Term Development Policy Framework include the following:
    to deepen ongoing institutionalisa- tion and internalization of policy formulation, planning and monitor- ing and evaluation (M&E) systems at all levels;
    institutionalise the mainstreaming of sustainable development principles in national development planning processes;
    to ensure the reduction of HIV/AIDS/ STI/TB transmission, and their proper management as well as promote healthy lifestyle;
    to develop and retain human resource capacity at national, regional and district levels;
    to harmonise ongoing and emerg- ing poverty reduction initiatives;
    to promote co-ordination, harmoniza- tion and ownership of the develop- ment process;
    to minimise the negative impact and optimise the potential impact of migration for Ghana's development; and
    to promote a sustainable, spatially integrated and orderly development of human settlements to support socioeconomic transformation.
    Perfomance in 2012
    In pursuit of its mandate, the Commission, during the year 2012, carried out or achieved the following among others:
    Prepared the 2011 National Annual Progress Report on the imple- mentation of the Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda
    (GSGDA).
    Chairman of the Finance Committee (Mr James K. Avedzi) 11:50 a.m.
    Observations and recommendations
    Inadequate funding
    The Committee observed that inadequate funding has been a major

    Vetted Sector and District Annual Progress Reports and prepared the National Monitoring and Evaluation Manual, the National Infrastructure Plan and assisted MDAs and MMDAs in the preparation of their sector plans.

    Organised a Baseline Assessment Study Dissemination Workshop to provide feedback on Monitoring and Evaluation Plans.

    Commenced preparation of a successor to the Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda

    (GSGDA).

    Outlook for 2013

    To achieve its stated objectives, the NDPC will undertake the following activities for the 2013 financial year:

    i. Recruit additional 45 new staff to augment the staffing position. Four substantive Directors for the 4 main units of the Commission, namely, Plan Coordination, Monitoring and Evaluation, Admi- nistration and Policy, will also be employed.

    ii. Carry out stakeholder consultative meetings to prepare a successor to the Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda (GSGDA)- Ghana's Medium-term Develop- ment Framework.

    iii. Continue its monitoring and evaluation programmes and activities at all levels of governance; and

    iv. Commence work on a six storey office complex for the Commis- sion.

    6.0 2013 Budget estimates of the National Development Planning Commission

    For the implementation of the above stated objectives and planned activities, a sum of eight million, nine hundred and ninety-four thousand, seven hundred and thirty-four Ghana cedis (GH48,994,734) has been allocated. Out of this, five million, five hundred and sixty-one thousand, four hundred and thirty-four Ghana cedis (GH45,561,434) is GoG and one million and five hundred thousand Ghana cedis (GH¢1,500,000) is ABFA, with one million, nine hundred and thirty-three thousand, three hundred Ghana cedis (GH¢1,933,300) being donor support.The breakdown is presented below:
    SPACE FOR BREAKDOWN - 11:50 a.m.

    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    No problem. If I am advised.
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, before I go to my contribution, I was hoping the Hon Minister for Finance would have told us why he was moving the Motion.
    This is because constitutionally, the NDPC is under the Office of the President and we know there are several Hon Ministers of State, one of them is in charge of financial and allied institutions.
    So, if the Hon Minister could have told us why those Hon Ministers -- Which one? Six of them. I would have been interested to find out. The Hon Minister of State --
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    Hon Member for Old Tafo, are you saying that the Hon Minister for Finance is not under the President?
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, what I am saying is that the NDPC in the Constitution --
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    I just want to know because --
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Minister for Finance is an appointee of the President. I am talking about --
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    Are the Hon Ministers in the Office of the President not appointees of the President?
    Dr A. A. Osei 11:50 a.m.
    But Mr Speaker, we have been told that six of them were appointed just so that the agencies under the Presidency can be supervised by them. Hon Fifi Kwetey is one, Hon Pelpuo is one and Hon Maj. (Dr)(Alhaji) Mustapha Ahmed (retd) is also one of them.
    Mr Speaker, that notwithstanding, the Hon Minister of State, Hon Azong has told the Committee that he would come back to us and give us a list of the Hon Ministers and their responsibilities. So, perhaps, I am assuming that that is not ready and that was why he moved on his behalf.

    Maj. (Dr)(Alhaji) Mustapha Ahmed (retd): On a point of order.
    rose
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    Hon Members, I do not intend taking submissions on this point. The Constitution is very clear and I refer you to article 58(3). Article 58(1) vests executive authority in the President and article 58(3) of the 1992 Constitution says and I beg to quote:
    “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the functions conferred on the President by clause (1) of this article may be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to him.”
    So, as far as this House is concerned, the question is that, is the Hon Minister subordinate to the President? If the answer is, yes, then he is entitled to move any Motion on behalf of the President.
    Papa Owusu-Ankomah 11:50 a.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for your ruling.
    I do not intend challenging the ruling or anything, but we know for instance --
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    But you would want to run commentary on my ruling?
    Papa Owusu-Ankomah 11:50 a.m.
    No, Mr Speaker. I would want, with your permission --
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    You are permitted.
    Papa Owusu-Ankomah 11:50 a.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker.
    We know that we have an Hon Minister who is responsible, for instance, is it Financial and Allied Services?
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    Do you have an Hon Minister responsible for the National Development Planning Commission?
    Papa Owusu-Ankomah 11:50 a.m.
    No, Mr Speaker. We do not have an Hon Minister responsible for the National Development Planning Commission. This is because the NDPC is under no Ministry. It is under the Presidency and for purposes of oversight, it is important for this House to know the extent to which the President's appointees are overseeing certain agencies, so that in the exercise of our oversight, we would know who to deal with.
    Mr Speaker noon
    What about in the situation where the Chairman of the NDPC is also the Senior Adviser to the President and therefore, he does not want to assign that responsibility to any officer subordinate to him -- and the Chairman of the NDPC has no audience on the floor of this House?
    Papa Owusu-Ankomah noon
    Mr Speaker, I entirely agree with you, except that in some of these cases, it would be helpful for purposes of effective governance, for the President to formally communicate to the House. Other than that, the House would be in this quandary. Mr Speaker, I hope you understand my point? You may not know that the House does not know.
    I would not want to say that you are just assuming. This is because in your position, you would have knowledge about these matters. But it is important that the President formally communicates and I am concerned particularly about the Minister; is it for financial --
    Mr Speaker noon
    The reason all of us have to be very careful and it touches on the issue raised by the Hon Member for Okere -- Is it still “Okere”?
    Mr Daniel Botwe noon
    Mr Speaker, it is still “Okere.”
    Mr Speaker noon
    You know he was trying to draw attention to a newspaper publication with regard to these appointments. The truth of the matter is that, those newspaper publications that we are referring to, the communication to this House, as a House, did not mention those matters at all to us.
    The communication did not mention those things that were put in the media and therefore, in my view, in my view, it

    is those that were officially communicated to me; those were the ones that I dealt with. But you have a point there. You have a point and people are listening.
    Prof. George Y. Gyan-Baffour noon
    Mr Speaker, I think that clarity is necessary but since we do not have it yet, the only Minister who is a member of the Commission is the Finance Minister, the ex-officio member of the Commission. He is the one nearest to the Commission. So, I think presenting it here at this point, will be all right but there is the need for the Presidency to be clear on who actually oversights it.
    But I think that as of now, he is the only one who is so close to the Commission and he can actually do a presentation like that.
    Mr Speaker noon
    That is very useful information you have provided to the House.
    Hon Members, let us deal with the estimates. For today, we are dealing with the estimates; so, let us as much as possible limit ourselves to the estimates.
    Dr A. A. Osei noon
    Yes, Mr Speaker, I raised the matter in a positive way because it came up during the Committee. The non- clarity of the supervisory role for the NDPC is creating problems for the Commission. In any case, if the Minister is a member, then it would not be wise for him to be judge and jury in his own -- But he was at the Committee --
    The NDPC claims that certain times they do not get enough of their budget because they do not have an advocate in Cabinet. You have rightly pointed to us that now, the Special Adviser who is the Chairman is there. In fact, the Committee -- it is not reflected in the comments -- recommended that the Chairman of the NDPC might be invited to sit in Cabinet, so that the views of the NDPC -- This is
    Dr Kwabena Donkor noon
    On a point of order.
    Mr Speaker, since this is a House of record, the Hon Member for Wenchi said the Minister for Finance was the only Minister on the NDPC --
    Mr Speaker noon
    No! That is not what he said.
    Dr Donkor noon
    Mr Speaker, he used the word “only”.
    Mr Speaker noon
    No! He said “here”.
    Dr Donkor noon
    No! This is because there are other Ministers who are members.
    Mr Speaker noon
    He said “here” in the House now.
    Prof. Gyan-Baffour noon
    Mr Speaker, the law only gives the Finance Minister as an ex-officio member of the Commission. All other members are just appointed by the President. But the law makes the Finance Minister the only ex-officio member of the Commission. I was the former Director- General of the Com- mission. So, the only member, Minister, ex officio, written in the law, is the Finance Minister.
    All other members are just appointed at the behest of the President without reference to any law. They may be Ministers; they may be --
    Mr Speaker noon
    Hon Members, we have had enough on this matter. Let us deal with the estimates.
    Dr A. A. Osei noon
    Mr Speaker, I would go right into my concern, which is expressed in the Committee's Report.
    I refer you to pages 8 and 9, the subject is on untimely and delays in the release of the funds. The Commission keeps complaining about untimely releases to them. Mr Speaker, if you go to page 9, with your permission, I would want to read and this tells us that we, as a House, must begin to decide what we want to do about this situation. With your permission, I beg to quote:
    “The Committee was informed that the staff and Commissioners of the Commission are among the poorly paid employees of comparable organisations in the country.”
    This is the constitutional body that is supposed to drive our long-term agenda. Going further, it says,
    “This situation, it was further added, has made it difficult to entice/ recruit and retain qualified professionals to work for the Commission. As a result of the above, the Commission does not have the full complement of staff particularly, the technical staff.”
    And Mr Speaker, here is the hitter --
    “The Committee learnt that the Commission currently has only fourteen (14) out of the fifty-two (52) technical and critical staff…”
    Mr Speaker, if such an important constitutional body only has 14 out of 52 of its required staff, what output do you expect to come from the Commission?
    -- noon

    Mr Speaker 12:10 p.m.
    Hon Members, I will take one Hon Member from each side. Yes. I have been advised that it should be two Hon Members each from both sides. So, you have spoken, the Chairman has submitted the Report. So, we have one each from both sides.
    Mr Alban S. K. Bagbin (NDC -- Nadowli/Kaleo) 12:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the issue of lack of funds for the National Development Planning Commission (NDPC) has been with us for a long time. Mr Speaker, I recall in National Democratic Congress (NDC) 1, the NDPC was clearly under the purview of His Excellency the President. Today, we are following the example of NDC 1, where the NDPC was totally under the Office of the President.
    Mr Speaker, during the time of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), the NDPC was under the President but some of the policy activities were also incorporated into the Ministry of Finance. So, we had the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning. So, the economic planning aspect was taken to the Ministry of Finance.
    Today, we have a Ministry of Finance. The Economic Planning aspect has been taken away and I believe given back to the NDPC.

    Mr Speaker, the fate of the Commission clearly depicts our view of the Commission. We are not putting priority on the work of the Commission and that is why it is suffering. So, I do not believe that we should be talking to the Minister for Finance because the budget itself is not for the Minister for Finance; it is a budget from the Presidency.

    So, we should be talking directly to the President, that we should take the NDPC serious and not only give it enough funds to operate but make sure that it gets the full complement of its human resource requirements.

    We are having a lot of problems with development planning because of this. Mr Speaker, we have been able to have only the medium-term development plans, but we have not been able to get a long-term development plan. Even from Vision 2020, we were able to iron out only a few short- term development plans up to 2000. That was the first phase, and then after that we have been somersaulting with some poverty reduction.

    Now, we are having Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda (GSGDA); these are all medium-term ones and where are we getting this medium- term from if there is no long-term development plan? It is when you have a long-term development plan that you divide it into medium-term development plans and then translate that into annual budgets. But because we are not taking it serious, the vision of the framers of the Constitution is lost.

    So, I would support the call, that we should as much as possible submit to His Excellency the President, strong words of the view of this Arm of Government -- Parliament -- to refocus on resourcing the

    NDPC.

    It is true that as of now, the Chairman of the NDPC, in the person of Mr P. V. Obeng, is a Senior Advisor to the President. That is a position that gives him a lot of leverage; but without resources, there is no much he can do. So, I support that we approve the estimates subject to the fact that His
    Mr Kwaku A. Kwarteng (NPP -- Obuasi West) 12:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would like to support the point earlier speakers have made, that the staffing of NDPC is boosted. But Mr Speaker, it also came up during our deliberations that the appointed Commissioners for the Commission were quite a number, and that for 2012, the meetings and allowances alone came to something in the neighbourhood of GH¢1.4 million. Mr Speaker, that is really big.
    Obviously, if this amount would be reduced, the savings could be put into recruiting more technical staff who do the work really, anyway. It would require that the law that forms the NDPC is amended, Mr Speaker, to cut back the number of appointed commissioners. The Director- General did concede at the discussions that suggestions in this regard have already been made to the Constitution Review Commission. But Mr Speaker, really, what we require are legal amendments, not really a constitution review.
    Mr Haruna Iddrisu 12:10 p.m.
    On a point of order.
    Mr Speaker, rightly so, that my Hon Colleague, if he is making a recommenda-
    tion to say so, that it is his opinion that the NDPC Act be reviewed --
    Mr Speaker 12:10 p.m.
    What statement did he make that --
    Mr H. Iddrisu 12:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I heard him made an authoritative statement that the Act is reviewed and the appointed commissioners are reduced. I have no problem if he is sharing an opinion and making a recommendation as an Hon Member of this august House, but not a sweeping directive as he is indicating.
    Mr Speaker 12:10 p.m.
    But Hon Minister, that is his opinion.
    Mr Kwarteng 12:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I was actually concluding when my Hon Member for Tamale South came in respectfully with this comment, that really would not have been made. But Mr Speaker, it is just to make the point that we need an amendment.
    That is the gist of the point I am trying to make this morning, that we really need to cut back on the number of commissioners; it is a suggestion to this House. As I indicated, once the supervising Minister's matter is settled, they should be taken up, so that savings could be made to recruit more technical staff.

    Question put and Motion agreed to.

    Resolved:

    That this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢8,994,734 for the services of the National Development Planning Commission (NDPC) for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Mr Speaker 12:20 p.m.
    Hon Majority Chief Whip, what is the next item?
    Alhaji Mohammed-Mubarak Muntaka 12:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we will move to item 7, that is, the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development.
    Mr Speaker 12:20 p.m.
    Is there no other Motion standing in the name of the Minister for Finance for today?
    Alhaji Muntaka 12:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, they are not ready.
    Mr Speaker 12:20 p.m.
    Very well.
    Hon Members, item 7 on the Order Paper.
    ANNUAL ESTIMATES 12:20 p.m.

    Minister for Local Government and Rural Development (Mr Akwasi Opong- Fosu)(MP) 12:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this House approves the sum of GH¢447,495,901 for the services of the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Mr Speaker, the sector allocation as provided within the medium-term expenditure framework for the 2013 financial year is detailed as follows: GoG GH¢162,684,507; donor contribution, GH¢ 189,811,394, ABFA, 5,000,000; social intervention programmes, GH¢90,000,000. Mr Speaker, the objectives, output and activities of the Ministry are captured in the medium-term expenditure framework for the 2013/2015 fiscal years and the budget estimates for the 2013 financial year.
    Mr Speaker, as part of Government's commitment to deepening democracy and rural development, 46 new districts were created and in order for the districts to operate effectively, they will be supported with logistics. In addition, the Local Government Service will ensure that all the 216 MMDAS and their departments are adequately staffed.
    Mr Speaker, the Ghana School Feeding Programme will continue in 2013 with the aim of attaining the key objectives of contributing to poverty reduction and improving food security in deprived communities. Mr Speaker, the Local Enterprises and Skills Development Programme (LESDEP) will be expanded to cover 60,000 beneficiaries.
    The Environmental Health and Sanitation Units will support MMDAs to acquire treatment and disposal sites and facilities as well as facilitate the review of bye-laws of MMDAS with their enforcement. Under a PPP arrangement, two waste-to-energy plants will be established in Kumasi and Cape Coast.
    Mr Speaker, I humbly request that the House approves the sum of GH¢447,495, 901 for the services of the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development for the 2013 fiscal year.
    I beg to move accordingly.
    Question proposed.
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Dominic Azimbe Azumah) 12:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, before I proceed to present the Report of the Committee, let me humbly request that on page 6 of the Report, table (c) items on wages and salaries should read GH¢116 not GH¢1121; there is an omission of the “6”. It is GH¢116,121, 205.
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Dominic Azimbe Azumah) 12:20 p.m.
    Introduction
    On Wednesday, 5th March, 2013 the Hon Minister for Finance, Mr Seth Emmanuel Terkpeh, in accordance with article 179 of the 1992 Constitution and Order 140 (1) and (2) of the Standing Orders of the House, laid before Parliament, the estimates of revenue and expenditure of the Government of Ghana for the 2013, fiscal year.
    Mr Speaker, in accordance with Order 140 (4) of the Standing Orders referred the draft annual estimates of the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development to the Committee on Local Government and Rural Development for consideration and report.
    The Committee met on Thursday, 14th March, 2013 and considered the annual estimates of the sector Ministry, which is in accordance with article 179 of the Constitution and Order 181 of the Standing Orders of the House.
    Acknowledgements
    During the deliberations on the estimates, the Committee met with the Minister for Local Government and Rural Development, Hon Akwasi Oppong-Fosu, the Chief Director, heads of the various departments, agencies and projects of the Ministry and officials from the Ministry of Finance. The Committee is grateful to these persons for their invaluable contributions.
    References
    In discussing the estimates, the Committee made reference to the following materials:
    a. The 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana.
    b. The Standing Orders of the House.
    c. The Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government of Ghana for the 2013 financial year.
    d. The 2013 draft annual estimates of the Ministry of Local Govern- ment and Rural Development.
    e. Report of the Committee on the 2012 Annual Estimates of the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development.
    Mission of the Ministry
    The Ministry is mandated to ensure good governance and balanced develop- ment of Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies (MMDAs) through the formulation of policies on governance, decentralization, rural development and environment and draws guidelines on the acquisition and use of human resources by Assemblies.
    The Ministry is further authorised to design and deliver systems that would set targets and monitor the performance of the Assemblies. It also developes, monitor sector plans and provides management advisory services to the Assemblies.
    Broad policy objectives
    The Ministry has outlined the following as its broad policy objectives:

    1. Ensure effective implementation of the Local Government Service Act.

    2. Strengthen and operationalise the sub-distr ict structures and ensure consistency with local government laws.

    3. Ensure efficient internal revenue generation and transparency in local resource management.

    4. Enhance civil society and private sector participation in go- vernance.

    5. Strengthen functional relationship between Assembly Members and citizens

    6. Promote well-structured and integrated urban development.

    7. Promote resilient urban infras- tructure development, mainte- nance and provision of basic services.

    8. Create an enabling environment that will ensure the development of the potential of rural areas.

    9. Accelerate the provision and improve environmental sanita- tion.

    10. Adopt a sector-wide approach to water and environmental sanitation delivery to ensure effective sector coordination.

    11. Mainstream the concept of local economic development into planning at the district level.
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Dominic Azimbe Azumah) 12:20 p.m.
    22. Develop and implement com- prehensive and integrated policy, governance and institutional frameworks.
    23. Ensure sustainable development in the transport sector.
    24. Develop adequate human resources and apply new technology.
    25. Foster social cohesion and enhance the participation of people in leisure activities as a way of improving healthy lifestyles.
    26. Improve sector institutional capacity.
    27. Increase equitable access and participation in education at all levels
    28. Ensure the reduction of new HIV and AIDS/STIs/TB Trans- mission.

    29. Bridge the equity gaps in access to healthcare and nutrition services and ensure sustainable financing arrangements that protect the poor.

    Review of 2012 budgetary allocation

    6.1 In the year under review, Parliament approved an amount of two hundred and twenty three million, two hundred and seventy-two thousand, one hundred and twenty-seven Ghana cedis (GH¢223, 272,127.00) from a combination of Government of Ghana (GoG), donor and social intervention sources for operations of the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development.

    2012 Allocations as reviewed

    The breakdown of the budgetary allocation for the sector Ministry for the 2012 fiscal year is indicated below in Table A. The 2012 expenditure breakdown by cost centre is indicated as appendix 1.

    Actual releases and expenditure for 2012

    The breakdown of the actual expenditure for the sector Ministry for 2012 is indicated in Table B below: -

    Table B

    Budgetary allocation for 2013

    The breakdown of the budgetary allocation for the sector Ministry and by cost centres for the 2013 fiscal year is indicated as Tables C and D below: -

    Table C

    SPACE FOR TABLE ‘A' - PAGE

    5 - 12.20P.M.
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Dominic Azimbe Azumah) 12:20 p.m.
    Environmental Health and Sanitation Unit
    The Committee was informed that the Environmental Health and Sanitation Unit completed two (2) engineered landfills in Tema and Sekondi-Takoradi. Also completed in the year under review was the Adjen-Kotoku compost plant in the Ga West District which was built in partnership with Zoomlion Company Limited.
    Centre for Urban Transportation
    The Committee was informed that the Centre in collaboration with the Ministry of Transport and the Urban Development Unit helped to develop the Road Traffic Regulation. The Centre also facilitated the formation of Urban Passenger Transport Units as well as their integration into the participating Metropolitan and Municipal Assemblies (MMAs) as Transport Departments under L.I. 1961.
    Urban Poverty Reduction Project
    The project was able to complete the preparation of 60 community business and development plans and also trained three hundred and sixty representations of local government institutions, civil society and the private sector to contribute to employment-oriented public-private- partnerships. Additionally, 15,000 properties of 14 MMDAs were re-valued by the project.
    Furthermore, 236 socioeconomic infrastructure projects were completed and handed over to beneficiary communities.
    Ghana Social Opportunities Project
    (GSOP)
    9.10.1 The Committee was informed that 36 sub-projects under the GSOP made up of 17 social infrastructure projects, 1 feeder road, 6 rehabilitated dams and 12 climate

    change interventions were completed. In addition, 145 others made up of 23 social infrastructures, 35 feeder roads of total length 114.2 kilometres and 83 climate change interventions are ongoing.

    Local Enterprises and Skills Development Project (LESDEP)

    In the year under review, LESDEP provided 44,735 unemployed persons with skills training in vocational, entre- preneurship and business development services. The beneficiaries were provided with set-up equipment and have established businesses in various trades.

    Food Security and Environment Facility

    (FSEF)

    In the year under review, FSEF supported 930 farmers to adopt soil improvement methods. 550 farmers were assisted with farm inputs, such as maize and soya beans in East Mamprusi, Builsa, Garu and East Gonja Districts. 422 were trained in production and post-harvest management of onions. Additionally, about 90 farmers from Sapeliga, Saka and Nagbere were sent to Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) for demonstration on two main onion varieties: Bawku red and the hybrid almi.

    Outlook for 2013

    Local Government Service

    The Committee was informed that the Local Government Service in pur- suit of its mandate, shall ensure that the 216 MMDAs are staffed with sub- stantive Co-ordinating Directors and heads of department.

    Co-ordinating Directors and heads of department will also be appointed for merged and established departments under Schedule I of L.I. 1961.

    In addition, the Service will establish regional human resource departments, 150 MMDAs HR units and District Works Department in all MMDAs. It will also integrate departments under Schedule II in L.I. 1961 into the MMDAs and develop sector-wide results based on M&E system for all RCCs and MMDAs to establish baseline indicators as well as implement the report on LG legislations review.

    The Committee was further informed that the Service will establish Management Information System (MIS) in the LGSS and HR database Management System (HRDBMS) to be linked with 10 selected MMDAs as a pilot programme and the subsequent incorporation of the of the Integrated Personnel Payroll Database (IPPD) into the LGSS management in at least, 5 MMDAs.

    Procurement of equipment for 50 MMDAs for the EU-Human Resource Support Programme (HRSP) is also on- going while terms of reference and request for proposal for human resource database update will be completed.

    District Development Facility

    10.2.I The Committee noted that, a total amount of US$66.30 million will be mobilised and allocated to MMDAs based on 2011 FOAT Assessment. The secretariat would also recruit consultants to conduct 2012 FOAT assessment for both DDF and UDG.

    Ghana School Feeding Programme

    The Committee was informed that the National School Feeding Policy will be launched and implemented. The programme will also collaborate with the

    National Food Buffer Stock Company (NAFCO) to introduce other food commodities other than rice.

    Department of Community Development

    The Committee learnt that the Department of Community Development as part of its mandate, shall transfer employable and sustainable skills to 6,000 youth through TVET. The scholarship programme would be extended to additional 300 girls from poor households in 59 selected District Assemblies. Again, vocational and entrepreneurial skills training will be provided for 800 rural community groups.

    In addition, the Department will organise income generating activities for 400 rural community groups and train 120 community educators at the Rural Development College.

    Births and Deaths Registry

    The Births and Deaths Registry would continue to provide vital statistics by way of demographics data for development planning. It will also improve registration coverage in the country and expand the Community Population Register Programme. Additional registration centres in rural communities will be established and the computerisation programme of the Registry completed.

    Department of Parks and Gardens

    The Committee was informed that the Department, with its improved budgetary allocation, would continue to promote landscape beautification of built and natural environment and collaborate with MMDAs to develop programmes for floral beautifi-
    SPACE FOR APPENDIX I - 12:20 p.m.

    -- 12:30 p.m.

    Mr Speaker 12:30 p.m.
    How did you arrive at the 80 pesewas? That was what you were told?
    Mr Speaker 12:30 p.m.
    Very well.
    Mr Ameyaw-Cheremeh 12:30 p.m.
    It is a piece of information, Mr Speaker, we gathered from the School Feeding Programme itself. So, we need to do something extra to feed them if the objective they set for themselves this year is to be achieved.
    Mr Speaker, in respect of deepening democracy and the creation of districts, the Hon Minister and the Hon Chairman of the Committee have spoken about it. Mr Speaker, we were told that out of GH¢42 million that was allocated for new districts, GH¢16 million was released. But this amount was not used for the purpose for which the allocation was made.
    Mr Speaker, if you look at the 2012 Budget, the then Minister for Finance and Economic Planning, on page 183, paragraph 810, and with your permission, I beg to quote:
    “Madam Speaker, as part of NDC's commitment to deepening demo- cracy and local development, 42 new districts have been created and GH¢1,000,000 as start-up capital per district has been provided to meet their initial infrastructural needs.”
    rose
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Hon Member, do you have a point of order?
    Mr D. A. Azumah 12:40 p.m.
    That is so, Mr Speaker.
    rose
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Hon Member, are you a member of the Committee?
    Mr Opong-Asamoah 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am not but I was previously a Municipal Chief Executive (MCE), so, I know what I am talking about.
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    You may be right, but he said ‘they were told'.
    Hon Member, is that not what you said?
    Mr Ameyaw-Cheremeh 12:40 p.m.
    Exactly so, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Chairman of the Committee, the Hon Member is raising an issue of misapplication, so it is important that we, who are the keepers of the purse, get the true position of the matter.
    Mr D. A. Azumah 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the information was that, yes, the inauguration came on and each Assembly was given GH¢100,000.00 for the inauguration. All other monies that were made available was meant for infrastructural development as take-off. I personally visited the Assemblies when on my rounds and most
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Hon Members, let us get the point.
    Hon Chairman of the Committee, the point the Hon Member is making is that the GH¢16 million was used for something different from what the House had approved. So, how much of the money was used for inauguration and how much was used for the renting of offices and all those things?
    Mr D. A. Azumah 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, that is exactly what I am saying. Each district was to benefit GH¢1.00 million and only GH¢100,000.00 was for the inauguration. All other monies that were released were -- [Interruption] -- Hold on. All other monies that were released were for the preparations of the take-off and those are the buildings, renting of houses, computers and the rest. Those things were sent, Mr Speaker, but not GH¢16 million -- [Interruption]
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    What were you told at the Committee? Are you the Chairman of the Committee?
    Mr D. A. Azumah 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am the Chairman. We were given GH¢100,000.00 each for the preparation and take-off of each district.
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Apart from the GH¢100,000.00 did they receive any other money?
    Mr D. A. Azumah 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, if I may explain further, strong transfers were made to the new districts but they were only instructed they take off at that time because DCEs had not been appointed for those areas and other things. The GH¢100,000.00 was meant for the take-off
    -- the preparatory stages. That was all but not for any other expenditure.
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Does the GH¢100,000.00 amount to GH¢16 million? If you multiply the GH¢100,000.00 by the 46 new districts -- [Pause] -- That was why I was asking that, apart from the GH¢100,000.00, were other monies released to the new districts?
    Mr D. A. Azumah 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, were monies released --
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Hon Chairman of the Committee, the Hon Member said they were told at the Committee -- you are the Chairman of the Committee, for that reason, when you got up, I called you to clarify the position.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we are talking about releasing amounts to the District Assemblies, indeed, the new districts that were created. The amounts that were allocated to them in the budget even before they were created, was GH¢1 million and not GH¢100,000.00. The GH¢1 million was provided to meet infrastructural needs. That was the approval Parliament gave -- infras- tructural needs.
    So, if you take even GH¢10.00 for inauguration and fanfare, it is wrong. Mr Speaker, that is the essence of what the Colleague has said. Even if it is GH¢10.00 for fanfare and inauguration, it is wrong. Parliament said that -- Mr Speaker, you would recollect that in approving of the budget for 2012, the districts had not even been created and that became a tussle in this House.
    The Hon Minister for Finance said: “Well, shall we escrow this amount and then after they had been created, they would be given the amounts to start the infrastructure?”
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Hon Members, let us get the point right.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the point is -- [Interruption.]
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Yes, you have made your point. The Hon Member mentioned GH¢16 million and that is why if you multiply the GH¢100,000.00 by the 46 new districts, you would get GH¢4.6 million. The Hon Member mentioned GH¢16 million. So, that was why I asked whether apart from the GH¢100,000.00, some extra monies were transferred to the new districts?
    Hon Chairman of the Committee, do you get my point? The GH¢4.6 million is different from the GH¢16 million; it does not add up.
    Mr D. A. Azumah 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, as at the close, GH¢16 million was expended by the Ministry on the new distr icts. Vehicles, computers and all that were expenditure incurred from the GH¢16 million and all the District Assemblies were instructed to get these things ready for the inauguration to take place. So, as part of the expenditure except the GH¢16 million, no money was expended.
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Very well.
    Hon Members, the point being made is that, it is not GH¢16 million which was used for the inaugurations, if I get him right. So, GH¢4.6 million is in issue. Whether that is a misapplication or not, is a different matter altogether. I do not want to go into that one but it is the GH¢16 million -- If GH¢16 million was used for the inauguration, that is a serious matter and that is why I tr ied to get the clarification from the Hon Member who raised the issue.
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Hon Members, let the Hon Member conclude.
    Alhaji Muntaka 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is important that we get the facts right.
    Mr Speaker, I am privileged to have one of the Municipal Assemblies situated in my place. Mr Speaker, as we speak now -
    - 12:40 p.m.

    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Are you not part of the Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly (KMA)?
    Alhaji Muntaka 12:40 p.m.
    No! I am no longer part of (KMA), Mr Speaker.
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    I see. What about the Minority Leader, is he still part of KMA?
    Alhaji Muntaka 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, he is still part of KMA. We are now only neighbours.
    Mr Speaker, as we speak now, the GH¢100,000 that was used for the inaugural ceremony was taken from their share of the Common Fund. [Interrup- tions] And Mr Speaker, it is important that we allow the Hon Minister for Local Government and Rural Development to come back later to brief us. As we speak now, the current Chairman was not the Chairman of the Local Government Committee when this was happening -- [Interruption] -- He was then the Minister of State.
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    Hon Members, I do not want to --
    Alhaji Muntaka 12:50 p.m.
    And Mr Speaker, to create the impression that out of the one million Ghana cedis approved for infrastructure, part of it was taken for the inauguration, that is why I am saying this. Not a dime, not one Ghana cedi from
    the money was used for this inaugural ceremony. If Mr Speaker, I am challenged, I can provide my Municipal -- the Common Fund report, which all of us always get on our municipals and districts, that shows that whatever they did with the inaugural ceremony, they did it within their own allocated resources and not the money, the GH¢1,000,000 that was meant for the creating of the infrastructure for the various Districts and Municipal Assemblies.
    Mr Dominic B. A. Nitiwul 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we are debating, not just debating -- we are looking at the Committee's Report. The two authorities that we would depend on are the Chairman's Report and the Hon Ranking Member's Report. The Hon Chairman moved the Motion and the Hon Ranking Member is seconding it. Both of them have admitted --
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    It was the Hon Minister who moved the Motion.
    Mr Nitiwul 12:50 p.m.
    Yes. Both of them have admitted, Mr Speaker, that GH¢100,000 was picked and confirmed by the Chairman for the inauguration activities out of the GH¢16,000,000. So Mr Speaker, we can safely say that, GH¢4.6 million was used for the inauguration out of the GH¢16 million released. [Interruption] If we are to be charitable, that is what the Chairman said.
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    Hon Members, please, there are some facts which we cannot contest at all. One, the fact that this House, during the last Parliament, approved GH¢1,000,000 as seed money cannot be contested. The fact that a GH¢100,000 has been released to the new districts cannot be contested. Yes. Hon Members, what is in contention now, based on what the Hon Minority Chief
    Whip said is, where the GH¢16, hundred thousand is taken from -- Whether it is part of the one million (GH¢1,000,000) or it is from a different source. He is saying that from the information he has from the District Assemblies Common Fund, it is not from that GH¢1,000,000.
    rose
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    Hon Members, these are matters that we can verify at the appropriate time.
    Hon Chairman, what again?
    Hon Majority Leader, let me hear from
    -- 12:50 p.m.

    Mr D. A. Azumah 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, this document was presented to us by the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development on the budget hearing. That is the authority on which we are operating and that was where he was quoting from. Yes, the allocation for seed capital for new districts -- GH¢42 million; expended -- GH¢16,061 -- 38 per cent.
    Now, when I spoke of the inauguration, I did not mean the ceremony. Events leading to the inauguration were the offices and computers. Later, Mr Speaker, vehicles were bought for some districts - - They all formed part of the GH¢16 million. These are the details of it: vehicles were procured for those districts to take off. It was all part of the GH¢16 million presented to us.
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    Hon Members, let me hear the two Hon Leaders and then I will make the necessary directives.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Chairman has told us that there was a release of GH¢42 million to the districts that were created; right? Mr Speaker, the approval for the districts stipulated that GH¢1.00 million each --
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am saying so because the Hon Chairman has insisted that each of the Assemblies was given one million Ghana cedis - [Interruption] -- Mr Speaker --
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    Hon Chairman, you made that point.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, he has made that point and I am asking him --
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    That is why I have clarified it. I also made that mistake of repeating your point.
    Mr D. A. Azumah 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, what was approved for each district was GH¢1.00 million each, which totalled GH¢42 million. But it was not given to them; this is exactly what I said. What was given to them was a sum total of GH¢16 million, of which GH¢100,000 was to prepare towards the inauguration of the districts.
    They bought computers, some rented office accommodation -- thereafter, after the inauguration, other things were bought for the districts amounting to GH¢16,000,161. This is the brief we got from the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, since he says to us that GH¢16 million was released to the 46 districts, now, if we divide GH¢16 million by 46, how much do we get? We get GH¢347,000. [Interruption] No! He has said in this House that GH¢16 million -- [Interruption] -- yes, total sum; and not in dispute; released to the districts. So, how much does each district get on the average?
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    Hon Majority Leader --
    Dr Benjamin B. Kunbuor 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I was surprised that the Hon Minority Leader has been very, very active on the floor. This is because we did have some gentleman's agreement about how the debate will proceed. So, I would indicate that there are very important issues in relation to the Local Government and this creation of new districts, of which I am also a beneficiary.
    I think the House will have to address this matter very closely and holistically. So, let us focus on the estimates. But I
    think it is a matter that we should bring back to this House to come and address, so that all these issues can be straightened up. I do not want to anticipate anything but I know why I said the House would have to revisit the matter.
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    I think so -- in view of the various versions that are being told.
    But Hon Members, I decided to take comments from the floor on this matter because we have the power over the purse and if an Hon Member gets up and says a certain amount has been misapplied, it should be of interest to the House as a House. It is on that basis that we try to seek clarification on the matter.
    But as the Hon Majority Leader has said, let us take this matter up at the appropriate time.
    Hon Ranking Member, you should conclude.
    Mr Ameyaw-Cheremeh 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I cherish the directive you have given, that probably, we would need to go into that matter in much detail, so that we know the spending areas of the GH¢16 million.
    I am grateful.
    Mr Speaker, with regard to Local Enterprises and Skills Development Programme (LESDEP), we are told that for last year, 2012, 44,735 people were employed by the Programme or given skills or training. That was made possible out of GH¢84 million allocated. And this amount was paid in full. The allocation was GH¢84 million, expenditure was GH¢84 million and that enabled LESDEP to recruit, train and impart skills to about 44,735 people.
    In this budget, Mr Speaker, an allocation of GH¢75 million has been made
    Mr Speaker 1 p.m.
    Hon Members, he is quoting from a source; he is quoting from a document. Nobody is contesting the document from which he is quoting from. And he is doing his analysis; you may disagree --
    Mr Pele Abuga 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Member, by comparing the figures this way, is misleading the House. [Interruption.]

    Mr Speaker, it is possible to even spend GH¢100,000 and give jobs to 30,000 people and yet you would use GH¢20 million to give jobs to 120,000 --
    Mr Speaker 1 p.m.
    Hon Member, because of your background, I would want to find out from you whether the GH¢84 million is solely for payment of compensation.
    Mr Abuga 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is not for payment of compensation. It includes training and a lot of activities, like purchasing of equipment for beneficiaries,
    Mr Speaker 1 p.m.
    Hon Member, we are being told that the figure is not solely for payment of compensation. So, take that on board.
    Mr Ameyaw-Cheremeh 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, he is just arguing. But that is how I understand it and the explanations that we have been given.
    Mr Speaker, in the year 2010, this House passed the Centre for Urban Transportation (CUT) --
    Mr Speaker 1 p.m.
    Hon Member, you are not the only person who is going to contribute to the debate. You can give your other points to the next person to make because you have been on your feet for a very long time.
    Mr Ameyaw-Cheremeh 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am concluding.
    Alhaji Ibrahim Dey Abubakari (NDC -- Salaga South) 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you for this opportunity to contribute to this Motion.
    Mr Speaker, a lot has already been said so I will not take much of your time. I would like to talk about two departments under the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development and that is the Births and Deaths Registry. Mr Speaker, we all know the importance of the Births
    and Deaths Registry. When one looks at the Budget Statement, the allocation made to the Births and Deaths Registry is GH¢3,796,956 and I deem this to be woefully inadequate, knowing the importance of this particular department.
    Mr Speaker, the restructuring of this department has begun. But I think it is long overdue and I think the Ministry would take it more important, so that the restructuring comes to completion. Why do I say so? The Births and Deaths Registry contributes a lot to our economy in terms of planning, economic benefits and other social benefits. Mr Speaker, let us look at what this particular department has registered in the year 2012.
    According to your Report, at page 10, we are told that the Committee was informed that the Births and Deaths Registry recorded 715,271deaths. Assuming the registration fee is even GH¢20 per person, when you multiply this by 715, you would get about GH¢40 million. Mr Speaker, if this department can raise GH¢40 million and the amount given to it is only GH¢3.7 million, in my view, do not see the importance of that department.
    We know that when the Births and Deaths Registry is well structured, even in our budgeting process, we would know the number of people at any time in our economy.
    Two, when you take our population at the moment, it is 24 million and assuming 3 per cent growth in the population, that is about 720,000 annually. When you multiply this by GH¢20, you would get almost GH¢14.4 million annually as a contribution from the Births and Deaths Registry.
    I would therefore, urge the Hon Minister in charge of Local Government and Rural Development to try as much as he can, to at least, set the process of this department, maintaining their internally
    generated funds (IGFs). If they cannot get 100 per cent of it, at least, 50 per cent of what they raise should go to this department, so that the restructuring process they have begun -- I quite remember when the Hon Chairman was making his contribution, he stated that when you go to their office, it is so deplorable and so disgraceful to see that such an important department as head office.
    When they maintain the IGFs, at least, they can have very beautiful buildings and they can also complete the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) process that they have begun, that would help at least, the department to grow.
    Another department -- When you take for example, the Civil Aviation Authority, in those days, when the Government used to take all the money and nothing was retained, everybody saw what happened at the Authority. When the Government passed the law and allowed them to retain all their money, today, when you go to the airport, you can see what Civil Aviation Authority has done. This can equally be done to the Births and Deaths Registry, by allowing them to maintain the IGFs and then they would be able to increase their offices in the districts.
    We all know that our lives begin at birth and ends at death. When the Births and Deaths Registry is restructured, even the local government can anticipate the number of children that are in their locality and planning for kindergarten, planning for primary school, they would know the total number that would help to go on, hence the importance of restructuring this department.
    The last one I would want to talk about, is the Department of Parks and
    Gardens. This is another department, I can say, when restructured well, can be a cash cow, it can bring a lot of money to help. As I am talking, people wonder whether that department is still living, if it is not dead. But when we met them, they said that they were still living and kicking.
    Unfortunately, what is happening is that, most of the contracts that Government should have given to this department are given to private organisations and hence Government is not contributing to bring this department to livelihood. As I am talking, even our own beautification of Job 600, which should have been given to this department, I learnt it was given to a private contractor.
    With your permission, I beg to quote, Mr Speaker.
    “The Department also undertook works and maintenance of lands, pavements of roundabouts, road medians and road shoulders in our city entirely. The Castle gardens, State House, Flagstaff, Asomdwee Park, et cetera.”
    This shows that if this particular department is given an adequate amount -- When we met them, they said that they were given GH¢1 million, of which they were very happy about. But GH¢1 million is woefully inadequate if we want to maintain this particular site. Therefore, I am urging the Government and for that matter, the Ministry, to make sure that, at least, enough money is given to this department to ensure that our cities, our road shoulders and all areas that should be beautified are done.
    With this, I would want to urge all Hon Members to support the annual estimates for the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development.
    Thank you for the opportunity.
    Mr Kwasi Amoako-Attah (NPP -- Atiwa West) 1:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you very much for this opportunity to contribute in support of the Motion.
    Mr Speaker, it was revealed by the Hon Ranking Member that, as much as 42 per cent of donor support has gone into this year 's budgetary allocation. It is important, and I find it gratifying, that the total amount in 2012 has been increased from a little over GH¢223 million to GH¢447 million. This obviously underscores the importance of this Ministry because of its nationwide coverage, particularly as its activities touch on the lives of our rural folks.
    But, Mr Speaker, it is not so much the quantum of the budgetary allocation as against the releases. And I only believe that during this fiscal year, efforts would be made to increase revenue mobilisation, so that all the allocations made for the various sectors of the Ministry would be met.
    Mr Speaker, if we glance through the breakdown of the actual and expenditure of the sector Ministry for 2012, on page 6 of your Report, that is table (b), you would realise that with the exception of compensation for employees, which is obvious, none of the sectors had enough releases to meet their activities.
    I am therefore, urging the revenue agencies to ensure that we bring enough money into the kitty, since these are just projections, so that all the activities envisaged for the Ministry would be met.
    Mr Speaker, a glance through your Report from page 13 to 19, clearly shows that the Ministry has catalogued a lot of activities which would be undertaken in the course of the year and the activities

    range from the newly established Local Government Service through all its affiliated departments. This, therefore, requires that there should be in place adequate infrastructure and equipment. But surprisingly, if you look at tables (c) and (d) of your Report as captured on pages 6 and 7, the allocation made under “assets” is only GH¢5 million as against allocations made for goods and services. As for wages and salaries, they are fixed, so they cannot be spoken on.

    Mr Speaker, I was expecting that budgetary allocation towards provision of assets would be increased, so that this envisaged provision of infrastructure and equipment meant for revamping all the departments of the Ministry would be catered for. I draw this from even 2012, which is also contained in the Report.

    In 2012, a whopping sum of GH¢1.27 million was vired from assets and it was added to goods and services. This is captured under number 11.1 of page 19 and can also be seen in table (b) of page 6, and I think it is worrying. It appears as if the Ministry is giving greater emphasis to the provision of goods and services and other things at the expense and detriment of infrastructure and equipment. I would want this to be taken into consideration since the effective running of the Ministry depends upon the tools that it has at its disposal.

    Mr Speaker, I would want to touch on the Department of Parks and Gardens. I am happy that at least, finally, the development services being rendered to this nation and by this department have been recognised, at least, in the 2013 Budget. Mr Speaker, I refer you to page 20 of your Report, and it is captured under point 11.7, and with your permission, I beg to quote:

    “This situation has led to increase in the allocation to the Department of Parks and Gardens from GH¢30.7 thousand in 2001 to the current GH¢1 million in 2013 . . .”

    This is a big gap and I believe that with this recognition, the department would take the advantage of it to --
    Mr Speaker 1:10 p.m.
    Is it 2011 or 2001?
    Mr Amoako-Attah 1:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, 2011 -- And then it is increased to GH¢1 million in 2013.
    I am saying that I believe this all- important department under the Ministry would take advantage of this upsurge in this budgetary allocation to prove itself and to provide services for this nation because we all know the services that the Parks and Gardens Department renders to this nation.
    But Mr Speaker, I would want to make a special appeal. Your Committee recommends under 9.11 that the Committee --
    Mr Speaker 1:10 p.m.
    Hon Member, wind up.
    Mr Amoako-Attah 1:20 p.m.
    “The Committee noted with worry that most state institutions have adopted the practice of engaging private companies to provide landscape and flowery environment for public buildings and open spaces without consulting the Department of Parks and Gardens.”
    On this, I would want to offer a free advice to the Department of Parks and Gardens, that what they have to do, is to intensify their marketing skills. They have to go out and solicit for jobs to increase their revenue. I do not think that Departments and government organi- sations on their own would go to them. This is a big area; so, if they take
    advantage of it, they would be able to increase their revenue and turn their department round.
    Finally, and in conclusion, I would want to say that this year is going to be very difficult for the Ministry because of the number of activities and programmes that they have to undertake in a way of deepening the decentralization pro- gramme which has been undertaken by this nation. I urge that this year must see the full implementation of the much- acclaimed composite budgeting, so that the decentralization programme would be meaningful in our nation.
    With this, I thank you.

    Question put and Motion agreed to.

    Resolved:

    That this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢447,495,901 for the services of the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Dr Kunbuor 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, if we could take Motion number 8.
    Mr Speaker 1:20 p.m.
    Hon Members, before we take item 8, Chairman of Youth and Sports Committee, have you resolved the matter with your Ranking Member?
    Mr Kobena M. Woyome 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, yes.
    Mr Speaker 1:20 p.m.
    Where is Hon Asiamah?
    Mr Frederick Opare-Ansah 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I believe you gave the Chairman and the Ranking Member an assignment --
    Mr Opare-Ansah 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, precisely my point. He is an Hon Member and we trust him, so --
    Mr Speaker 1:20 p.m.
    I have verified from the Chairman and the Ranking Member but I would want it to be placed on record, that is why I called him and I was also going to call the Ranking Member to confirm before I make him lay the Paper.
    Hon Ranking Member, Youth and Sports, have you resolved the matter?
    Mr Isaac Kwame Asiamah 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, rightly so; we have resolved the matter.
    PAPERS 1:20 p.m.

    Mr Speaker 1:20 p.m.
    Hon First Deputy Speaker to take the Chair.
  • [MR FIRST DEPUTY SPEAKER IN THE CHAIR.]
  • ANNUAL ESTIMATES 1:25 p.m.

    Minister for Communications (Dr Edward Omane Boamah) 1:25 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢56,968,314 for the services of the Ministry of Communications for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    This is to ensure effective and efficient management of the information commu- nication technology (ICT) and Telecommunication sector of our country. Through this, we would be able to pursue the eastern corridor fibre optic broadband back-bone infrastructure, which is stretching from Ho, all the way to Bawku and then Tamale to Yendi.
    We also intend to pursue-Application programmes such as e-Justice, e- Parliament and e-Immigration. Research development which is linked to job creation in the area of business process outsourcing, will also be pursued.
    Thank you.
    Question proposed.
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Herod Cobbina) 1:25 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I present the Report to the Motion moved by the Minister for Communications.
    Introduction
    The budget estimates of the Ministry of Communications for 2013 were referred to the Select Committee on Communications for consideration and report in accordance with Orders 140 (4) and 182 of the Standing Orders of the House. This followed the presentation to Parliament of the 2013 Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government by the Minister for Finance, Mr Seth E.Terkpeh, in accordance with article 179 of the 1992 Constitution and Order 140 (2) of the Standing Orders of the House.
    The Minister for Communications, Hon Edward Omane Boamah, and a technical team from the Ministry and its departments and agencies, assisted the Committee during its deliberations.
    Reference documents
    The Committee consulted the following documents:
    The 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana.
    The Standing Orders of the House.
    The Budget Statement and Econo- mic Policy of the Government of Ghana for the 2013 financial year.
    The Budget Statement and Econo- mic Policy of the Government of Ghana for the 2012 financial year.
    Report of the Ministry of Communi- cations on the actual releases and expenditure of the Ministry of Communications for 2012.
    1.2 Vision and mission of the Ministry
    The vision of the Ministry of Communications (MoC) is to take advantage of the emergence of information communications technology (ICT) to facilitate the creation of a knowledge economy founded on technological excellence to promote rapid socioeconomic growth and wealth creation, and to improve upon the overall global competitiveness of the nation.
    Its mission is to facilitate the development of a reliable and cost- effective world-class communications infrastructure and services, driven by appropriate technological innovations to enhance economic competitiveness in a knowledge-based environment.
    In order to realise its mission, the Ministry has set out strategies aimed at furthering various policies, aims and objectives. These are targeted at achieving specific results.
    Objectives, policies and strategies
    Objectives
    The broad objectives are to develop policies, programmes, regulations and laws that will help integrate commu- nications technologies and public information systems for national development, and also harness the full potential of resources for effective communication. The objectives include:
    i. to promote rapid development and deployment of the national ICT infrastructure;
    ii. to strengthen the institutional and regulatory framework for managing the ICT sector;
    iii. to promote the use of ICT in all sectors of the economy;
    iv. to facilitate the provision of quality meteorological data and forecasts in support of weather sensitive sectors of the economy;
    v. to promote e-Government and e- Governance activities for transparency in government business;
    vi. to promote and encourage the expansion of postal and courier services for the social and economic development of the country;
    vii. to invest in and strengthen the institutional and human resource capacities for quality service delivery; and
    viii. to ensure that modern infor- mation and communication technologies are available and utilized at all levels of society.
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Herod Cobbina) 1:25 p.m.


    Pursuant to the mandate of the Ministry, these agencies have the responsibility for handling specific operational functions of the sector, which have substantial impact on the private sector industry players and the nation as a whole.

    2012 in retrospect

    TABLE 1 -- 2012 ACTUAL EXPENDITURE OF THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNI-

    CATIONS .

    In 2012, the communications sector of Ghana witnessed significant transforma- tion -- it expanded in scope as well as in technological excellence. Ghana was acknowledged by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) as one of the countries in the developing world with the fastest growing ICT industry. As per the summarised table above, the Ministry exceeded some of its budgetary allocations while in some cases, the releases were not forthcoming.

    Telecommunications

    In the area of telecommunications, the total telephone subscription for both cellular/mobile and fixed lines, in Ghana, as at December, 2012 was 25,903,408 yielding a tele-density of 105 per cent. This does not mean that every single Ghanaian owns a telephone line. It may rather be attributed to the fact that some subscribers own multiple lines because some areas have no network access whatsoever. Be that as it may, this is still a marked improvement from the December 2008 figure of 11,713,699, representing 52.4 per cent tele-density.

    Mobile Number Portability (MNP)

    There has been an improvement in average porting time from 5 hours, 21 minutes as at July, 2011 to between 7 and 8 minutes towards the end of 2012.

    National Subscriber Identity Module

    (SIM)

    In 2011, the Ministry, through NCA, implemented the policy of national registration of Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) cards and by the end of December 2012, approximately 100 per cent of Ghanaian phone users had been properly

    SPACE FOR TABLE 1 - PAGE

    7 - 1.20P.M

    registered. The essence of the registration is to generate a database to facilitate the battle against crime.

    Managing fraud in international telephone traffic to Ghana

    Under the verification exercise undertaken by the National Communi- cations Authority (NCA) that formally began in June, 2010, the number of ‘SIM Box Fraud' numbers detected reduced across most of the networks. The operation led to the arrest and conviction of ten (10) illegal SIM Box operators in

    2012.

    This accomplishment in checking phone termination fraud, led to increase in revenue from the sector. Coupled with the implementation of the Electronic Communications Amendment Act 2009, Act 786, Government received revenue amounting to US$89 million from the telecom sector within two years (2011 & 2012). Ghana's experience subsequently has become the best practice, which other countries are emulating to benefit from the non-taxable revenue from international telephone traffic.

    Digitisation of manual records

    One of the milestones achieved thus far in this area is that, five million manual records of the Births and Deaths Registry (BDR) are being digitised and indexed. In addition to the BDR, a considerable amount of records of the Ghana Registrar General (GRD) have been digitised. By the end of January, 2013, over 70,000 companies had had their manual records digitised and the same is ongoing at the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA).

    Government e-Payment/e-Commerce Platform (GEPP)

    The set-up/installation of GEPP has been completed on the Virtual Server
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Herod Cobbina) 1:25 p.m.
    Environment provided by NITA at the Pilot Data Centre to host the GEPP e- Commerce platform. GEPP domain (epay.gov.gh) and secure web has been provided with all the requisite certificates (SSL Certificates).
    Development of National Portal
    NITA built a national portal where access to e-Services can be accessed. A pilot to test this service was ran with 11 agencies consisting of Passport Office, NCA, GTA, NIA, Mineral Commission GPS-CID, NITA, FDB, and Births and Deaths. The Ghana Integrated Financial Management System (GIFMIS) also runs on this e-Government Network. Currently there are about 70 MDAs nationwide connected to this platform through the e- Government network.
    e-Immigration
    The aim of the Ghana entry system for visitors is to manage the growth of visitor numbers in a cost-effective way through the use of cutting edge technology and to deliver a level of service consistent with the expectation of today's travellers.
    The deployment of an integrated e- Immigration system, capable of regulating entry into and exit from Ghana, will not only provide a case management system for permit processing, but will also meet the current and future needs of the Ghana Immigration Service, as well as improve on the quality of service they offer to the public. This will also help regulate and monitor the activities of foreigners in relation to employment and residence.
    Bid documents for the automation of the Airport, the land borders of Aflao and Elubo, as well as the Ghana Immigration

    Service Headquarters had been evaluated awaiting feedback from the World Bank.

    Deployment of Ghana Online Services

    To enhance Ghana online services, a portal infrastructure was deployed to provide a platform for content management, document management, e- Forms and service integration as well as information and application security for the various Government agencies.

    The pilot phase of the project commenced in August, 2012 with Government agencies like the Drivers and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA), the Passport Office, National Information Technology Agency (NITA), National Identification Authority and the Minerals Commission. Additional MDAs that benefited from the pilot project are the Births and Deaths Registry, the Police CID, the Food and Drugs Authority (FDA), Ghana Tourist Authority, National Communications Authority (NCA) and Accra Metropolitan Assembly (AMA).

    Pilot data centre infrastructure and network operating centre

    The construction of the pilot data centre which started in August, 2012 has been completed with the installation of all network and data communication equipment finalised. Integration of internet into the network core for redistribution to the MDAs had also been successfully done.

    The data centre and network operating centre (NOC) are supporting the Government network that will connect all MDAs, regional centres and district offices, hospitals and the Police. NITA provided 24 MDAs with e-Mail services. Additionally, 156 MDAs, regional centres and districts had also been connected to the internet.

    Data Protection Commission

    The Ministry, in 2012, established the Data Protection Commission subsequent to the enactment of the Data Protection Act, 2012, Act 843. It is expected that the Commission will build confidence in Ghana's ICT deployment and its application for electronic governance and cyber-security management.

    Internet Registry

    The Ministry, in collaboration with the Global IPv6 Forum established an IPv6 Test Laboratory and innovation centre at the Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence in ICT. The main objective is to prepare for the eventual migration to the internet addressing space when it becomes imminent. This way, data networks and systems across the country can enjoy a smooth transition without damages/ interruptions.

    Review of National ICT for Accele- rated Development Policy

    In response to technological and contemporary global developments, the Ministry reviewed the National ICT Policy to include issues of broadband policy; cyber security policy, ICT, environment and climate change policy; and geo- information policy through an all- encompassing stakeholder consultation. The updated policy document was subsequently finalised and is ready for implementation in 2013.

    National Digital Broadcasting Migration

    In compliance with the Geneva 2006 (GE06) Agreement, a contract has been awarded for the implementation of the

    Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) Network Infrastructure. In addition to this, the National Digital Broadcasting Migration Committee (DBMC) has completed the development of the Final Draft Minimum Specifications for the Free to Air (FTA) (DTT) Receivers (i.e. digital decoders and integrated TVs) to guide companies interested in investing in digital receivers and also prevent the importation of inferior products.

    Ghana Meteorological Agency

    (GMET)

    The Ghana Meteorological Agency (GMet) modernised its weather observing systems at the airports by installing state- of-the-art Automatic Weather Surveillance Rader, which was inaugurated on 13th June, 2012 at the Agency's Headquarters by His Excellency the President John Dramani Mahama, then Vice President.

    Additionally, the Ministry continued its consultation process with the Attorney-General's Department for the review of Act 682 to empower Ghana Meteorological Agency (GMet) to charge fees for commercial services rendered to the aviation industry to generate funds internally and become financially self- sustaining.

    ICT Skills and Human Resource Development

    The Ministry, in collaboration with the EU, through AITI-KACE sponsored PASCAL Network of Excellence and Jozef Stefan Institute to establish an artificial intelligence laboratory which will support research and development at the university level in Ghana and the West African sub-region.

    Expansion of Universal Access

    To promote the policy of the availability of postal communications, as universal service rights of the citizenry in the country, the Ministry, through Ghana Post
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Herod Cobbina) 1:25 p.m.
    management, monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the automation of revenue agencies through a PPP arrangement to help generate adequate revenue for Government. In addition, the project will ensure that the --
    system installation of e-Immigration reaches an advanced stage of completion;
    system designs for e-Parliament, e- Justice, e-Procurement to be initiated;
    e-Services are up and running in eleven selected agencies; and
    e-Payment for selected Government services is operational.
    In all its discussions, it was clear that the Ministry has delineated four thematic

    areas which it believes will enhance performance in the sector -- putting people first, a strong and resilient economy, expanding infrastructure and transparent and accountable governance. It is the sector's position that this focus can best be facilitated through the deployment and utilisation of ICT as an enabler and driver of its entire agenda. Accordingly, the policies and programmes of the MoC have been structured in such a way that they will rapidly help to promote the advancing of “Better Ghana” and sub- region.

    Allocations for 2013

    For its 2013 activities, the Ministry has been allocated a total amount of fifty-six million, nine hundred and sixty-eight thousand, three hundred and thirteen (GH¢56,968,313). This is made up of GH¢ 9,998,894.00 from GoG, GH¢898,880.00 from internally generated funds, and GH¢ 46,070,539 from donor funds.

    Table 1-2013 BUDGET ALLOCATION AND SOURCES OF FUNDING

    Observations and recommendations

    Budgetary allocations and releases

    The Committee observed that though the Ministry had requested an amount of GH¢3,973,400.00 for the compensation of employees in 2012, the amount of GH¢8,118,696.00 was released by the MoFEP and all of it was used.

    The Minister attributed this inflation of the compensation figures to the Single Spine Salary Structure (SSSS). He informed members that staff of the Ministry had finally been migrated onto the SSSS and, apart from the new salaries they received, were also paid all their arrears from 2009. Since the arrears have been settled, it is not expected that such a figure will be repeated this year.

    Internally Generated Funds (IGFs)

    The Committee observed that the communications sector had generated a lot of funds for the State, with the revenue from the clamp down on illegal termination alone, amounting to about eighty-nine million dollars ($89,000,000). The Ghana Broadcasting Corporation has also not been allocated any GoG funds, which means that it is now basically self- sufficient with its internally generated funds.

    Meteorological Services

    In the light of generating enough funds internally to ensure independence and less reliance on GoG allocations, the Committee noted that GMet could make a lot of money from the services it renders to various entities, especially the aviation sector. The Agency used IGF in the amount of GH¢689,649.00 but the

    SPACE FOR TABLE 1 - PAGE

    12&13 - 1.20P.M.

    Committee observed that backed by dynamic legislation, the GMet was in the position to make much more which will wean it of its dependence. There is, however, an urgent need to review and amend the Ghana Meteorological Agency Act, 2004, Act 682, to strengthen the Agency and, more importantly, compel its key stakeholders and clients, like the Ghana Airport Company Limited, to fulfil their financial obligations once the Agency has rendered them the vital services needed to ensure their smooth operations

    Ghana-India Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence in ICT

    The Committee observed, yet again, the immense potential of the Centre of Excellence to generate IGF having made more than GH¢ 541,227.00 during 2012. The Committee, however, noted that the Centre is not allowed to use any of the funds for its operations except if items on which it is to be spent are income generating functions. Otherwise, all its IGF goes to the Consolidated Fund.

    The Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence in ICT, Ghana's first advanced information technology institute was established in 2003 and has been engaged in capacity building to bridge the ICT human resource gap between academia, government and industry.

    This state-of-the-art facility provides a dynamic environment for market- oriented training of ICT professionals and also for developing the capacity to apply research and innovative technologies for socioeconomic development within West Africa and beyond.

    The Committee, therefore, recom- mends that as a matter of urgency, the Ministry must lay before Parliament and
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Herod Cobbina) 1:30 p.m.
    facilitate the passage of the Ghana-India Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence in Information and Communication Technology Bill to guide the legal status of KACE.
    Postal and Courier Service Regula- tory Commission (PCSRC)
    The Committee also observed that the MoC, in pursuance of its postal sector reforms and the objective to create a more liberalized and competitive postal and courier service environment, promoted the establishment of the Postal and Courier Services Regulatory Commission under the PCSRC Act, 2003 (Act 649), with the responsibility to license and regulate the operations of postal and courier services in Ghana.
    The passage by Parliament of the Postal and Courier Sector Regulations will therefore, strengthen the Commission in making the industry more dynamic, effective and competitive especially in this era of technology application in postal service delivery.
    In essence, the Committee is of the view that the communications sector is doing well and improving by leaps and bounds in this age of information. It is however, vital that the requisite laws and regulations are put in place to ensure dynamism and optimal performance by all departments and agencies. It is for this reason that the Committee recommends that the MoC must, as soon as possible, lay the necessary Bills and Regulations before Parliament to ensure the smooth running and sustainable growth of the sector.
    Conclusion
    In the light of the foregoing, the Committee recommends that the House approves the total sum of GH¢56,964,314, made up of GH¢9,999,894 from GoG,
    GH¢898,881 from internally generated funds, and GH¢46,070,539 from donors, for the implementation of the strategies and policies of the Ministry of commu- nications for the 2013 financial year.

    Ranking Member of the Committee (Mr Ken O. Agyapong): Mr Speaker, I rise to support the Motion from the Hon Minister and the estimates from the Hon Chairman.

    In spite of all these, I also have reservations and would want to urge the Government to assist the Ministry. This is because during our deliberations, we realised it is an important Ministry, that if, indeed, is given the help or the amount needed, they would be able to do well for the country by way of revenue mobilization.

    Why I am saying this, is that Mr Speaker, in 2012, a budget of GH¢74,989,589 was approved for the Ministry but in 2013, it was dropped, reduced or cut drastically to GH¢ 56 million. In a situation where the donors are giving GH¢46 million in 2013, one would realise that in 2012, less amount was contributed by the donors and about GH¢26 million from the internally generated funds (IGFs) in 2012, was what actually helped the Ministry to raise US$89 million revenue for the Government.

    Mr Speaker, you would be surprised to know that this year, the IGF given to the Ministry is GH¢898,800. I feel it is very small and therefore, if the Ministry would ask the Ministry of Finance to come back again and give them more money -- This is because we have realised that if they are given more money, they would be able to raise enough revenue to help the Government.

    But if a Ministry raises US$89 million for Government through internally generated funds, through the SIM card

    faults and later when they are asking for more money to support the work they do at the Ministry, they are rather given GH¢898,800 compared to the 2012 Budget where they were given an IGF of GH¢26 million --

    That is the argument I am raising; that it is an important Ministry and we would want to urge the Hon Minister for Finance -- Fortunately, he is sitting by the Hon Minister for Communications -- He should take note of what we are saying, so that in July or November, if he comes for a supplementary budget, he would take into account the importance of the Ministry of Communications and assist them.

    I also observed that the Ministry submitted GH¢1.924 million as employee compensation and the Ministry of Finance approved GH¢449,990. Mr Speaker, the question is, how are they going to pay these workers? I feel employment compensation in any business is called fixed cost. It is something we cannot do away with.

    So, if they cut the budget drastically and it affects employee compensation, we do not know how the Ministry and other agencies are going to pay the workers. So, we are asking the Ministry of Finance -- [Interruption] -- to assist because I know, definitely, it is going to create problems when it gets to the middle of the year, around June, July. The Ministry is going to suffer because they would not know where they are going to get it.

    Another point, I realise is that, the Ministry might not be overspending but because they cut their budget, when they give them a supplementary budget and they go beyond it. This is because they do not have enough; it would appear as

    if they have overspent the budget that is given to them. So, instead of the Ministry of Finance cutting this budget -- It is even more than half; it is about two-thirds of it. I expect the Hon Minister for Finance to capture this, let him know that this is a cost that at all cost, he is going to pay. So, he should not just tell us that “I have cut this and I am coming back in July to ask for more.”

    When he does that, the figures would not tally. Sitting back, I would say that the Ministry has overspent but in actual fact, they have not because it is a fixed cost that they have to take care of.

    Mr Speaker, I believe we also have the broadcasting emigration. I think it is about time the Ministry started the education. We know the level of education of Ghanaians in this country. If we plan to go into digital migration in 2014, I believe by now, they should have started educating the people that in 2014, we are moving from analogue to digital -- But if we do not do that and we wait till 2014, I am afraid, even some of our Hon Colleagues will not even understand.

    So, I think it is about time that the Hon Minister collaborated with the National Communications Authority (NCA) and started the education. If not, I believe, in 2014, if we start educating people, it will be too late and there will be problems.

    With these few words, I support the motion.

    Thank you.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:40 p.m.
    One more from each side.
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim (NDC -- Banda) 1:40 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for the opportunity given to me to support the Motion.
    Mr O. B. Amoah 1:40 p.m.
    On a point of order.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Colleague made two statements, which I think, for the records of the House, he should be more specific. Indeed, he said that this House with the collaboration of the Ministry passed several laws to be able to earn over GH¢80 million and that he expects this House to pass several laws to earn additional GH¢80 million.
    That is very vague; which are the laws that he is talking about? Which laws were passed and which laws is he expecting to be passed by this House to earn additional income for the Ministry? He cannot just make a sweeping statement that several laws were passed and several laws will be passed.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:40 p.m.
    Hon Member, I think he was making the point that there was some amendment Bill which came here and which went through and that there are a few more Bills to amend further laws. That is the point. It does not mean that each amendment will generate so much income and therefore, to ask for specifics.
    Mr O. B. Amoah 1:40 p.m.
    Yes, Mr Speaker, and I was also very interested in the kind of laws he is talking about. He cannot just make a sweeping statement -- Laws were passed, laws will be passed. Which laws?
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, in 2009, this House amended Act 786 to enable the Minister for Communications to check SIM-box fraud and that generated a revenue of US$89 million and as the Minister for Communications and his technocrats are finding ways of checking the SIM-box fraudsters, they are also advancing avenues to make sure that they out-smart us.
    As of now, the law has become weak and it is our recommendation that we should continue to make the necessary amendment to the Act 786 that was
    amended in this House in 2009 in order to give the necessary enablement for the Minister to continue --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:40 p.m.
    Hon Member, your point is well made; continue.
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, not only that, the Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence, they brought the Bill here that they wanted to upgrade it into a tertiary institution. The Bill was introduced in this House; it was referred to the joint Committee on Education and Communication; we sat on it but because we were about to end our last term, Mr Speaker, we could not pass it into law -- [Interruption]
    Mr Frederick Opare-Ansah 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am surprised at my Colleague because just last week, we were told by the National Communications Authority (NCA) at a meeting that they needed to come to this House for us to help them check the incidence of SIM-box fraud. Now, he is telling us that we have already amended some law, which allows the Ministry and the NCA to check SIM-box fraud and it gave us US$89 million.
    Mr Speaker, I remember Government came to this House to ask Parliament to pass a Bill, that allowed Government to control the pricing of international traffic and for that matter, Government taking a certain percentage of that. The NCA also told us that fixing the price at that level does not control the SIM-box fraud. So, I am trying to find the correlation between the Hon Member's allusion to that Act and the control of SIM-box fraud.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:40 p.m.
    How do you respond to that, Hon Member?
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, yes, it is true that the Committee or the House passed a law to fix the international pricing
    of the incoming calls. Mr Speaker, what I am saying is that, now, the NCA says just that one will not give them the enablement to be able to check the SIM- box fraud and that is why we need to further amend the law and that is clearly the point I am making. When the time comes, this House will do a diligent job by making sure that the law is necessarily amended to give them that power to check the international calls traffic.
    That is the point I am making and my Hon Colleague, who is a member of the Committee, knows very well and I believe he is setting the records straight and it is part of the job that I seek from Hon Colleagues.
    Mr Speaker, my main concern is about the Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence. I think as a matter of urgency -- We could not pass that Bill last term. We have come back and I believe when the time comes, we should come together to make sure that we give them the necessary support, the legal backing to pass that law, so that they can use most of their IGF to raise it to an international status whereby it will be one of the best centres of excellence in the West African sub-region.
    Mr Speaker, I think one important issue that I cannot sit without raising is the issue of the state of the art radar that we installed at the Kotoka International Airport. Mr Speaker, you remember in 2012, the Ghana Meteorological Services was using manual ways of checking the weather forecast and other things and one pathetic thing was that at times when they said it was going to rain heavily, it ended up not raining at all and when they predicted sun shine, it ended up raining. And because of that, in June, 2012, His Excellency John Dramani Mahama, who was then the Vice President, inaugurated the state-of-the-art radar at the Kotoka International Airport and that has given

    the enablement. The only problem, however, is that according to the Ghana Meteorological Service, that radar is not able to reach the place where we are drilling the oil and therefore, their request is that we should make sure that we extend coverage to that part , so that they can give us a good weather forecast to the point where we drill the oil.

    With these few words, Mr Speaker, I beg to support the Motion.

    Thank you very much.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:40 p.m.
    Thank you.
    The last contribution.
    Mr Joe Baidoe-Ansah(NPP -- Kwesimintsim) 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would want to make a few observations with regard to the budget of the Ministry of Communications.
    Mr Speaker, one thing we observed is that, since August last year, no monies were paid to the Ministry of Communi- cations apart from salaries, although they had approved their budget. The reason that was given was that, they were experimen-ting with the Ministry, they were using a system, and because of that experimen-tation, the Ministry was supposed to submit some request but they could not meet the deadline.
    Mr Speaker, I think this is the time for the Minister for Finance to relook at what happened because we were told that they were going to extend the pilot project to other Ministries. And if by extending them, it is going to produce this result, a result of budget that has been approved that would not be released, then I think the Minister should look at the issues involved again.
    Mr Speaker, one other observation is that, Government is making a lot of investments through the Ministry -- a lot of investment, infrastructure and others. But I think one issue we should be looking at again is the whole question of data security. This is because we can put a lot of money into this investment, but if we do not protect them, we would just lose everything one day. It looks like the criminals are becoming more advanced, sometimes with technology than those of us from the developing world.
    So, Mr Speaker, it is important to look at the security and its investments because it is public money.
    Also on the question of investment, the funds for the Ghana Investment Fund for Electronic Communication (GIFEC) --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:50 p.m.
    With regard to the state of business, I would like to direct that business be extended beyond the prescribed time for business.
    Mr Joe Baidoe-Ansah 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, GIFEC is making a lot of investments, that is, trying to open up areas where accessibility is not so good. But I am not very sure how much returns they are making out of these investments. This is because they invest and they pull out. Who takes care of it? For example, ICT centres in various communities are being left -- I do not know what the Ministry is doing but it is important that the Hon Minister goes back to evaluate some of these projects.
    The sustainable nature of these projects should be looked at because we cannot just put public funds in ICT centres and then withdraw; who pays for the workers there, how we are sustaining them, nobody seems to be interested.
    Mr Speaker, I think we should be interested in ensuring these -- Also the question of whether some of these investments in towers would not be handed over to our backbone company. This is because we already have a backbone company that is in charge of that infrastructure. Why do we not just look at it, whether it is possible to hand these investments back to them, so that they take care of them, so that they ensure that this country makes maximum returns out of those investments.
    Mr Speaker, with these few words, I support the Motion.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:50 p.m.
    Hon Minister, can you just sum up?
    Dr Edward Omane Boamah 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would want to thank Hon Members of the Committee for their useful suggestions.
    They would be adequately catered for -- The National Data Centre is being developed and in a maximum of six months from now, we would have completed that and that is going to ensure that we are able to protect Government's data very well.
    We are also ensuring that we have an integrated system between GIFMIX, GCNET and also the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA), so that we will not even duplicate most of these platforms that are being established.
    We also know that we would have to establish a management modules in most of these projects that GIFEC is rolling out, which is the community information centres and also the towers that are being built and the telecom companies have been hoisting their mast on them.
    So, we take these as very useful suggestions and we assure Members of Parliament that we would pursue them in the course of the year.
    Thank you.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:50 p.m.
    Hon Minister for Finance, without pre- empting, some issues were raised regarding the internally generated funds (IGFs) and what portions thereof is allocated to that particular Ministry. Is there any solution? Could there be a percentage of the total sum or something? This is because looking at it, it does not appear to be completely fair to this Ministry. I do not know what remarks you have to make.
    Mr Seth E. Terkpeh 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, actually, I had taken note because in the Committee sittings that I attended, the issue of IGF also came up. It came fully with the Judiciary; so, I was going to address it in my winding-up on the Appropriation Bill. But suffice it to say that it is an issue which has legislative element and we will have to come back to the House after rationalization of the whole IGF scheme before we can make a move on it.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:50 p.m.
    And please, when that happens, do not forget the Ministry of Justice and Attorney- General's Department. [Laughter.]
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Resolved:
    That this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢56,968,314 for the services of the Ministry of Communications for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Mr Sampson Ahi 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we would want to suspend Sitting for now and reconvene at 3 o'clock.
    Mr Nitiwul 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I think there was a pre-agreement for suspension of Sitting for at least, one hour. So, I support the application.
    MR FIRST DEPUTY SPEAKER
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:50 p.m.
    Hon Majority Leader?
    Dr Kunbour 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, if we could go back to the presentation of Papers and then take item 4(k).
    PAPERS 1:50 p.m.

    ANNUAL ESTIMATES 1:50 p.m.

    Minister for Finance (Mr Seth Terkpeh) 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢9,900.203 for the services of the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justicce (CHRAJ) for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Mr Speaker, in so doing, I wish to stress the importance of the Commission which is highlighted in the Report, including its mandate, which is to promote and protect the fundamental human rights of all persons in Ghana, ensure the administrative

    justice through investigative mechanism and serve as an anti-corruption agency, which is also tied to investigations on instances of alleged and suspected corruption, conflicts of interest and misappropriation.

    Mr Speaker, these remain laudable objectives and it is for this reason that the performance of the CHRAJ was evaluated and the provision made for the appropriation for which we are seeking the mandate of the House to enable the Ministry disburse the funds in the course of the year.

    Question proposed.
    Prof George Y. Gyan-Baffour (on behalf of the Chairman of the Committee) 1:50 p.m.
    I am here to present the Report of the Committee.
    Mr Speaker, this Committee is actually headed by the Majority Leader and I am deputising for him here because he was busy when the Committee sat. So, I am doing this on his behalf. Therefore, on my side here, we would expect that two people would speak because I am just going to give you the Report.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:50 p.m.
    I understand.
    Prof Gyan-Baffour 1:50 p.m.
    So, Mr Speaker, the Report --
    Introduction
    The Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government for the year ending 31st December, 2013 was presented to Parliament on Tuesday, 5th March, 2013 by the Hon Minister for Finance, Mr Seth E. Terkpeh, in accordance with article 179 of the 1992 Constitution.
    Pursuant to Order 140(4) of the Standing Orders of the House, the Speaker referred the draft annual budget estimates for the Commission on Human Rights and
    Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) to the Special Budget Committee for consideration and report.
    The Committee met with the Deputy Commissioners of CHRAJ, and officials from the Commission and the Ministry of Finance and discussed the draft budget estimates. The Committee acknowledges the input of the Commissioner and other officials and wishes to extend its appreciation to the personalities who attended upon the Committee.
    Reference documents
    The following documents were referred to:
    The 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana;
    The Standing Orders of the Parliament of Ghana;
    The Budget Statement and Econo- mic Policy of the Government of Ghana for the 2012 financial year.
    Mandate of the Commission
    The mandate of CHRAJ is three-fold. They are as follows:
    A national human rights institution, which promotes and protects the fundamental human rights of all persons in Ghana.
    A Public Services Ombudsman, which ensures administrative justice, by the investigation of complaints of administrative injustices, abuses of power and victimisation in the public sector.
    An anti-corruption agency for the public sector, by the investigation of all instances of alleged or suspected corruption, conflicts of
    interest, misappropriation of public funds by officials and breaches of code of conduct of public officials.
    Performance in 2012
    In 2012, the Commission made a substantial contribution towards en- hancing good governance, integrity in public office, improving public service delivery, and entrenching the culture of respect for human rights and human dignity.
    Under its anti-corruption mandate, the Commission led a multi-sector stakeholder group to develop and submit the National Anti-Corruption Action Plan (NACAP) to Parliament for consideration and adoption. The NACAP is the national blueprint for fighting corruption over the next 10 years.
    Among other things, over 100 CEOs and heads of MDAs were trained on the code of conduct for public officers and conflict of interest rules; sensitization programmes were held to educate the public on corruption; and investigations completed into 31 major cases on corruption.
    Under the human rights mandate, CHRAJ engaged consultants to develop the baseline survey of the situation of human rights in Ghana which will feed into a National Human Rights Action Plan (NAHRAP). The Commission also completed investigations into 10,964 complaints, and conducted 2,750 public education programmes in rural communities and schools.
    In addition, a nationwide monitoring programme was undertaken of the performance of Ghana in the promotion and protection of rights, which led to the release of the report on the state of human rights in Ghana.
    The Commission also intensified public education to promote best practices in public administration and improve public sector service delivery as part of its administrative justice mandate. The Commission worked with heads of public

    sector institutions to promote under- standing of its administrative justice oversight role and completed the investigations into 1,043 complaints.

    Outlook for 2013

    This year, the programme outlook of the Commission has been prepared in accordance with the broad policy objective of transparent and accountable governance under the GSGDA. The Commission will continue work on the National Anti-Corruption Action Plan (NACAP). When completed, the NAHRAP will deal with the promotion and protection of fundamental human rights in a comprehensive, holistic and systematic manner. The Commission will also work with other stakeholders to improve Ghana's performance on the corruption index.

    The Commission will be providing training for heads of MDAs, Ministers and

    MPs on the code of conduct and legislations on conflict of interest. It will also enforce the code of conduct for public officers, intensify public education on corruption; assist Parliament to develop code of conduct for MPs, collaborate with stakeholders to implement and monitor the NACAP; and investigate about 300 complaints/ allegations of corruption.

    The Commission will complete its gender assessment programme and develop gender policy and action plan; educate 3,000 communities and schools on human rights and investigate about 11,000 human rights complaints to strengthen its protection mechanisms for the vulnerable.

    2013 Budgetary allocation

    The summary of 2013 initial ceiling as against the reviewed allocation has been shown in the table below.

    The table depicts that a sum of nine million, nine hundred thousand, two hundred and three cedis (GH¢9,900,203) out of an initial ceiling of GH¢16,163,481 has been allocated to the Commission to carry out its planned programmes and activities for 2013. The most notable reduction is that of goods and services allocation, which had over seventy-nine per cent (79.37 per cent) of its initial ceiling slashed.

    Observations and recommendations

    The Committee observed that, the work of the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) is geared towards the promotion and protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms; the promotion of fair administration of public services and the promotion of better service delivery to the public. The activities of CHRAJ also contribute to the promotion of national integrity and the elimination/ reduction of corruption in the public sector.

    Unfortunately, over the years, the Committee has also observed that, CHRAJ is one of the seriously under-resourced independent governance institutions in the country.

    The Committee was informed by the Deputy Commissioners that, the inadequacy in budgetary allocation and late releases have resulted in high attrition rate, lack of specialised capacity training of staff to boost performance, which affects the effective delivery of programmes of the Commission.

    The Committee is of the opinion that, insofar as the Commission continues to be under-resourced, with as much as eighty per cent of its programmes and activities funded by developing partners,
    SPACE FOR BREAKDOWN - 1:50 p.m.

    Dr Matthew O. Prempeh (NPP -- Manhyia South) 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I hope the Hon Minister for Finance would take note that budgets have been cut, but CHRAJ's budget has been cut severely. It is like we are going to pay CHRAJ to stay in their house and not do any work.

    The work of CHRAJ is a public service to all of us. As the Hon Alfred Kwame Agbesi just said, when you decide to cut the budget of the organization that is supposed to protect public good, such as CHRAJ, I do not know what else -- Mr Speaker, even if you look at the compensation alone, the compensation budget has been cut by about 16 per cent. How are those people going to be paid? Unless we are pre-programming the Ministry of Finance to come back to us with a supplementary budget, I do not know how they are going to be paid.

    The service CHRAJ is rendering, as Hon Agbesi has said -- promotion of good governance, integrity in the public sector, peace and social development -- any cut in the goods and services budget of such an organization, means that we are undermining good governance, we are undermining integrity in the public sector, peace and social development.

    Mr Speaker, I would plead that the Minister for Finance takes very good note of CHRAJ, that in his consideration, never again, should CHRAJ's budget be cut so unduly.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:50 p.m.
    The last contribution -- Yes, Hon Yieleh Chireh.
    Mr Joseph Y. Chireh (NDC -- Wa West) 3:50 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for the opportunity to support the Motion.
    In supporting this Motion, we need to look at the resources that we have allocated to the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice vis-à- vis the mandate. It has a triple mandate -- the mandate to deal with human rights, the one to deal with ombudsman position and of course, the fight against corruption. And if you are given these mandates and indeed, we would want to add one more in terms of the Right to Information, if the
    Bill ever gets passed, for them to be the ones to inspect and ensure that this happens.
    For us to be seen properly doing what good government should do -- ensuring that we have public accountability -- in order that we have the ombudsman position strengthened because there are so many public institutions that take the ordinary person for granted, it is only the CHRAJ which will ensure that these things are corrected. Then of course, the fight against corruption is a serious one.
    In my view, I think that we should look at giving more resources to the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice. This is because how much we lose as a result of corrupt practices in the public sector is unimaginable. But because we are politicians, we are the first group of people they attack. But we know that many politicians do not have access to funding sources. It is the bureaucracy and other people who do all the bad things but we take the responsibility. So, when it comes to these, we have to be serious about what we do.
    Again, I think that getting public information across, getting what we do across, ensuring that the public has information about what is going on, we need to strengthen the CHRAJ and I believe that if there are cuts as my Hon Friend was trying to allude to, we must look and redirect the resources properly because they will help us to protect whatever is also generated in the form of revenue. And if we do not strengthen this department, all our talk about good governance would be to naught.
    We must have institutions that police all of us and ensure that the right thing is
    done.
    On this note, Mr Speaker, I thank you for the opportunity.
    Prof Gyan-Baffour 3:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I requested that we could take two contributions from our side, so Hon Annoh-Dompreh is ready --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:50 p.m.
    All right. Please, you have the floor.
    Mr Frank Annoh-Dompreh (NPP -- Nsawam-Adoagyiri) 3:50 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for the opportunity to contribute to the Motion on the floor.
    Mr Speaker, not too long ago, the visitation of the President of the United States of America, Barack Obama -- He made a popular statement that is still re- echoing in my mind as I stand to make a contribution to this matter. Mr Speaker, what he said was, as a country, what we need is not muscles but what we need as a country to develop is the strengthening of our institutions.
    I am totally surprised, Mr Speaker, taken aback for the cuts that I have realised in the budget provision for the CHRAJ. The Hon Minister for Finance, up till this time, has not been able to provide any reasons for these strange cuts. And so, I join the voices of Hon Members who contributed earlier to say that that cut needs to be considered again. And just as the Hon “Napo” said, never again --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:50 p.m.
    We do not have any “Hon Napo”, we do not know “Hon Napo” --
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 3:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you for the correction.
    Just as the Hon Member for Manhyia South (Dr Prempeh) said, that should not be repeated in the history of our country.
    rose
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 3:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, in going forward, it is also a fact to realise that CHRAJ is supposed to be an independent State institution. Now, if CHRAJ's oxygen that they are supposed to run with, which is the funding, is being reduced, Mr Speaker, with your permission, I can say with confidence that in other words, the independence of CHRAJ is being compromised by the Government.
    Mr Bagbin 3:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am on a point of order and I am quoting Order 93 (1):
    “Reference shall not be made to any matter on which judicial decision is pending in such a way as may, in the opinion of Mr Speaker, prejudice the interest of parties to the action.”
    My Hon Colleague, in his submission, stated that there were payments of “strange judgment debts”; “strange judgment debts”. These are pending in the courts -- a number of these cases are pending in the courts and Mr Speaker, it is not, and it is out of order for an Hon Member of Parliament to refer to such as “strange judgment debts”, “strange judgment debts.”
    Worse of, the prejudice it would give to some of the parties in the case. And I am calling on him to withdraw that statement. It is important for him to withdraw that statement as being unparliamentary and completely in total conflict with our Standing Orders.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:50 p.m.
    Hon Member, can you give further and better particulars of the “strange judgment debts” you are talking about? Hon Member, you made the statement, so, I want you to give further and better particulars.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 3:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, with the greatest respect to your office and with the greatest respect to the Hon Bagbin, whom I respect so much, I say this being fully aware of what is happening in the country. I am also fully aware -- [Interruption] -- I am also fully aware, Mr Speaker, that the matter is --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 3:50 p.m.
    Hon Member, I asked you a simple question. Give us further and better particulars of the “strange judgment debts” you are talking about.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 3:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am fully aware of the matter, that is the reason I did not go into specifics -- [Interruption] -- So, if you can kindly allow me to finish, Mr Speaker, with your kind permission.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
    So, you are aware that the matter is pending before court; is that right? Hon Member, please, answer the question. You are aware that the matter is pending before court; right?
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 4 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am not aware of that; I am not even aware of that. Mr Speaker, with your kind permission, I am not aware of any matter before the law courts. All I sought to say is that, if the CHRAJ as a very critical --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
    I am taking you back to the use of the expression “strange judgement debts”. Give us further and better particulars. It is as simple as that. Which judgement debts are you referring to as “strange”? [Interruption.] Hon Member, if you cannot give us the details, then withdraw it.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 4 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, if we look into the history of our country, since the dawn of independence, judgement debts have been paid in this country.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
    But you are saying that this payment is strange and I want to know which one you are referring to. [Interruption.] Order! Order!
    Hon Member, let us play to the rules of the game. If you cannot give the details of the “strange judgement debts” you are talking about, then withdraw it. If you can give the details, let us know, then we would know whether the objection raised by Hon Bagbin is in order. It is a simple thing.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 4 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, if the Hon Member's problem has to do with the word “strange”, then I am referring to judgement debts in general, in our country. And Mr Speaker, you are aware that judgement debts have been paid --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
    Hon Member, let us not drag this matter beyond its limits. We all are aware that there are certain cases pending before court. If you are referring to those ones, then his objection would hold water. If you are not referring to those ones, then we look further to find out what you are referring to. It is as simple as that. [Interruption.]
    rose
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
    Please, answer my question; I will come to you Hon Minority Leader.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 4 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, with the greatest respect to your high office, since my Leader is on the floor, I yield to him.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
    Hon Member, you have made a statement. It is categorical. I have seen that the Hon Minority Leader has risen. But you have made a specific statement and I have asked you a simple question; give me the answer and then we move on. [Interruption.]
    Order! Order!
    Hon Minority Leader, may I hear you?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I just walked in and I think the matter relates to judgement debts that he has described as “strange”. Mr Speaker, I think the issue is whether some judgement debts could be described as “strange”.
    Indeed, if after a judgement debt has been paid, the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice of the country goes to court to dispute the payment, that particular judgement debt is strange. [Hear! Hear!] Mr Speaker, if it is not strange, the Attorney-General will not be pursuing it. To this nation, it is strange; that particular judgement debt is strange.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, from what I am hearing, it is not discussing the merits or demerits of the case. He is only saying that, to the extent that some payments have been effected and to the extent that the State is unsatisfied and through its Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, is pursuing the matter further in court, that judgement debt which had been paid is strange.
    Dr Kunbuor 4 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, there are many things that we can get away with when they are said outside the floor of this House. But any statement that is made on the floor of this House has to be a serious statement and not what takes place in a pedestrian manner, outside.
    Every lawyer knows that a judgement, no matter strange and wrong you perceive it to be, remains a judgement of the court until it is set aside. So, you cannot have a characterisation of a judgement and its debt as strange.
    Even if the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice is pursuing it in court, the status quo of that judgement remains until a higher court sets it aside. And that is why we are saying that, anybody can run his commentary in the little drinking bars about judgement debts. But it should never go on the record of this House, which is a distinct, separate arm of Government, to be questioning the activities of another arm of Government that has been validly taken and have not been set aside.
    So, I am saying that he is completely out of order to be describing a judgement debt as strange. You wait till they have
    set aside that judgement and the debt associated with it, then you can run that type of commentary.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, if I am hauled before a court of competent jurisdiction to be tried for any case and I tell my side of the story to my Attorney representing me, I am not guilty of this. I hold strongly to it that I am not guilty of it in the court. Mr Speaker, whether or not judgement has been given, I am right to hold my opinion and articulate same.

    Mr Speaker, I do not think that we want to be pedestrian in this House; there should be decorum. So, wild gestures should not be entertained here; there should be decorum.

    Mr Speaker, I was saying that now, the State, this country is the one that is pursuing this case. Our lawyer, our Attorney is the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice. We have told the Attorney-General that the case is, as far as we are concerned, Ghanaians are concerned, is strange. And our Attorney- General and Minister for Justice, our lawyer is pursuing the case for us. And who is saying that that is pedestrian?

    Mr Speaker, with respect to the Majority Leader, he has left the Attorney- General's Office. Mr Speaker, I am not a lawyer, but this is commonsensical -- [Interruption.] It is commonsensical -- and tell me I am not speaking law? Yes, it is common sense. Mr Speaker, the State, our Attorney is the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice and we Ghanaians have told our Attorney-General and Minister for Justice “pursue this case because it is strange”. And we are telling our Attorney-General, it is strange, we have not erred.
    Dr Kunbuor 4 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, rightly -- I should not be doing what I am doing with the Minority Leader because the Hon Minority Leader clearly does not know what he is saying.
    The reason I say, that is, no matter how intelligent you are, you do not go into professional, technical matters, because if you attempt to do that, you are actually presenting and holding yourself out to be what you are not. So, when you say a legal issue is common sense, that is the first thing they teach every first year law student. [Interruption.] That any word that you see to be so ordinary, is the most difficult to interpret in law. [Uproar!]
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4 p.m.
    Order! Order! Hon Members, order! Order!
    Dr Kunbuor 4:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am simply saying that if the Hon Minority Leader had made this statement to me outside this Chamber, I will entertain it -- “strange judgement debts”. But you cannot allow a statement like that -- [Interruption.] Wait! I am making a serious point. You cannot allow a statement like that to go on the records.
    Let me tell him that all the professional lawyers who are here, we are still governed by the ethics of our profession and it is ethically wrong for lawyers to sit here and allow the House to be misled on points of law. So, it is an ethical responsibility on me as a lawyer to correct the impression. I would want to set the records straight by saying that, no matter how our native sense tells us how wrong or strange a judgement is, until it is set aside, it remains a judgement. That is the correct legal position.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am not engaging in any interpolation with the Hon Majority Leader, and we have not descended into interpretations of whatever; we have not.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
    Order! Order! Hon Members, order!
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, he should not be infatuated at all. Hon Woyome should not. It calls for calmness.
    Mr Speaker, with respect to the Hon former Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, I stick to this. This is not about ethics and here, in this House, if you discuss issues, it would be left to Mr Speaker to say that: “Now, the commentary, is overboard and so, it breaches our procedure, can you withdraw it?” That is taken.
    But to the extent that Mr Speaker does not think that the Hon Member making it has veered off, it does not border on ethics for any Hon Member to say that: “I am directing the House”; he cannot. He cannot and no Hon Member can be pretentious. He cannot.
    Dr Kunbuor 4:10 p.m.
    Hon Minority Leader, sit down.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
    Order! Order!
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker,
    he does not have the power to tell me to sit down, please. That is what he does not know. This is because in this House, it is not for him to tell me to sit down. Right? We are guided by law here and our regulations do not allow him to just stand up and say, “Minority Leader, sit down”. It does not lie in his mouth; it does not. [Interruption.] He withdraws? I concede and can I go on?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
    Hon Members, can we have some order? [Uproar.] Hon Members, can we have some order!
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:10 p.m.
    I should not be engaged --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
    Hon Minority Leader, please, let us have some order. [Uproar.] Hon Members, order!
    I think this matter is dragging on far too long. I will like to give my ruling.
    It is clear that from what has transpired here, the matter is pending before the court. Since it is pending before the court, by Order 93 (1), we have no mandate to discuss it on the floor. Accordingly, I would direct that the Hon Member who made the statement withdraws that portion of his statement.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 4:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am very happy the controversy and the debate my statement has elicited -- [Hear! Hear!] I can see clearly that -- [Interruption.]
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
    Order! Order! Hon Members, order!
    Please, go ahead.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 4:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, Chinua Achebe, a popular Nigerian writer once said:
    “When dry bones are being mentioned, old women get worried.”
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
    Thank you.
    You can proceed with the rest of your contribution.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 4:10 p.m.
    I can just wind up. Mr Speaker, if I can just wind up.
    In going further, CHRAJ as we all know, is a critical State institution. The aspect that is dear to my heart is the independence of CHRAJ. Until the Government gets to the level where necessary budgetary provisions are given to CHRAJ to sustain its independence, the Government will not be making a meaningful attempt at strengthening CHRAJ.
    With these words, I rest my case.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
    Thank you very much.
    Hon Minister for Finance, if you can just sum up.
    But before you do that, I would like to draw Hon Members' attention to the fact that by the report of the Constitution Review Commission, which has been accepted by the Government's White Paper, provision has been made for the setting up of a particular Fund for these bodies like CHRAJ, like NCCE, and so on, so that they can be adequately funded and we would not have this kind of problem that has generated so much debate this afternoon.
    But Hon Minister for Finance, please, sum up.
    Mr Terkpeh 4:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, a number of observations have been made in the course of these contributions. The most important ones, two of which I wish to address.
    In fact, one of them has been addressed in the Report of the Committee at page 5, item 6.1 where the last sentence says that the Committee was informed by officials of MoFEP that the contingency vote has been set aside in the budget to cater for shortfalls in employees compensation. That is because employee compensation is not fully decentralised to the MDAs. There is an element of it which is administered within the Ministry of Finance.
    The second point to note is that, the concern about compensation provisions being lowered can also be attributed to the fact that the arrears portion of the Single Spine Salary Structure is non- repetitive and therefore, no repetition has been made for the payment of further arrears for institutions that have already been migrated unto the Single Spine Salary Structure.
    With these few words, I take note of the observation that these independent institutions require adequate resources and prompt releases to conduct their affairs and we take due cognisance of that.
    I thank you very much.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
    I thank you very much.
    Hon Members, the Report has been duly deliberated upon and the Motion has been moved.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Resolved:
    That this Honourable House aproves the sum of GH¢9,900,203 for the services of the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) for the year ending 31st December 2013.
    Dr Kunbuor 4:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we would take item number 10.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:10 p.m.
    I am sorry. I was not paying attention.
    Dr Kunbuor 4:10 p.m.
    Item number 10, Mr Speaker.
    ANNUAL ESTIMATES 4:20 p.m.

    Minister for Finance (Mr Seth E. Terkpeh) 4:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢18,103,149 for the services of the National Commission for Civic Education (NCCE) for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Mr Speaker, in so doing, I wish to state the importance of the National Commission for Civic Education (NCCE), with respect to a number of activities which require the education of the public, notably, when it comes to areas such as elections, which we have just gone through.
    The Commission has done a lot in the course of 2012; these are captured in the Report, which will be reported on and we do recognise these and have made provision in the budget for the amount of approximately GH¢18 million to support its operations.
    Question proposed.
    Prof George Y. Gyan-Baffour(on behalf of the Chairman of the Committee) 4:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to support the Motion and as I said earlier, with regard to the one that we just passed, that is the CHRAJ, I am also doing this on behalf of the Majority Leader who is the Chairman of this Committee.
    Mr Speaker, in doing so, I present your Committee's Report.
    Prof George Y. Gyan-Baffour(on behalf of the Chairman of the Committee) 4:20 p.m.
    Introduction
    The Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government for the 2013 financial year was presented to Parliament by the Hon Minister for Finance, Mr Seth E. Terkpeh on Tuesday, 5th March, 2013 in accordance with article 179 of the 1992 Constitution.
    Pursuant to Order 140 (4) of the Standing Orders of the House, Mr Speaker referred the annual budget estimates of the National Commission for Civic Education (NCCE) to the Special Budget Committee for consideration and report.
    Subsequently, the Committee met on Wednesday, 13 th March, 2012 and considered the referral. The Committee benefited from clarifications on the referral from the Chairperson of the NCCE, Mrs Charlotte Osei, officials of the NCCE and the Ministry of Finance.
    The Committee is grateful to the officials for their assistance.
    Reference documents
    The Committee referred to the following documents during its deliberations:
    i. The 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana.
    ii. The Standing Orders of the Parliament of Ghana.
    iii. The Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government of Ghana for the 2012 financial year;

    iv. The 2012 Annual Budget Estimates of the National Commission for Civic Education.

    v. The Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government of Ghana for t h e 2013 financial year.

    Mandate of the NCCE

    The NCCE is a constitutionally established institution with the mandate to create, promote through civic education, an understanding and commitment to democracy and inculcate in the citizenry, the awareness of their rights and obligations.

    Performance in year 2012

    The Committee noted that untimely release of funds to the NCCE adversely affected the implementation of some of its programmes and activities in the year 2012. Nevertheless, the following activities were carried out among others:

    a. The NCCE organised public campaigns through radio and television and also initia- ted inter-party dialogue com- mittees at the regional and district levels.

    b. The NCCE embarked on intensive community mobilisation for massive participation in the biometric voter registration exercise.

    c. The Commission held an annual democracy lecture at the Accra International Conference Cen- tre (AICC) on the topic “Building a Peaceful, Democratic, Non- partisan and Prosperous African State: Understanding why African Leaders Have Gotten it Wrong”.

    d. The Commission also organised a three-day sensitisation workshop for 200 youths on drug abuse and drug trafficking.

    Outlook for 2013

    For the year 2013, the NCCE will undertake the following activities among others:

    a. The Commission will conduct leadership workshops for the youth, women and people with disabilities (PWDs) to create awareness about the negative effect of drugs.

    b. The Commission will also sensitize the public on gender and equity, local governance reforms, local government bye-laws and the state of sanitation in Ghana.

    Budgetary allocation for year 2013

    For the implementation of the above activities, an amount of eighteen million,
    Prof George Y. Gyan-Baffour(on behalf of the Chairman of the Committee) 4:20 p.m.
    Observations and recommendations
    The Committee made the following observations and recommendations during its deliberations:
    a. Inadequate budgetary allocation
    The Committee noted that the budgetary requirement of NCCE for the 2013 fiscal year is GH¢33,325,451.00. However, it has been allocated an amount of GH¢18,103,149.00, representing a shortfall of GH¢15,222,302.00. Ironically, the Committee noted that the allocation to NCCE for 2013 is about 43 per cent less than the actual expenditure of GH¢32,049,986.60 in 2012.
    The Committee noted that the NCCE's estimated budget to take care of salaries and allowances of its staff is GH¢26, 241,951.00. However, it has been allocated an amount of GH¢14,397, 492.00. According to officials of the NCCE, the allocation would not cover the salaries and allowances of 934 members of its staff. Again, the Commission has been allocated an amount of GH¢2,239,897.00 for goods and services instead of a desired budget of GH¢ 5,540,500.00.
    In effect, the achievement of set targets of the Commission would be greatly affected. For instance, the NCCE's programme for building the capacities of governance institutions and Members of Parliament to enable them perform their respective mandates and functions would not be fully achieved.
    Considering the mandate of the NCCE and its relevance in the democratic dispensation of this country, the Committee is of the view that the allocation made to the NCCE for the year 2013, if not increased at all, should not have been decreased.

    The Committee, therefore, recommends that the Ministry of Finance (MoF) should ensure that the shortfall in the NCCE's allocation for the year 2013 is catered for should there be a supplementary budget to enable it achieve its objectives. The Committee further urges MoF to put measures in place to ensure that funds are released on schedule.

    b. Office accommodation

    The Committee observed that the problem of lack of office accommodation is still an issue bedeviling the NCCE. The Committee noted with dismay that the NCCE is still occupying five rooms located within the precincts of the Electoral Commission. The five rooms as indicated to the Committee, are currently accommo- dating about 135 staff of the NCCE. According to officials of the NCCE, this situation is hampering the smooth running of the operations of the Commission.

    The Committee views this situation as worrisome, especially where the NCCE needs to augment its staff strength. In the opinion of the Committee, the situation, if not addressed, would greatly affect the performance of the Commission. The Committee, therefore, recommends that the Government, as a matter of urgency, should provide the NCCE with an office complex that can accommodate its staff to ensure smooth running of its operations.

    c. Lack of funds for educational programmes

    The Committee observed that the Commission was not able to implement most of its educational programmes in the year 2012 due to lack of funds. For instance, one hundred and eighty (180) inter-party dialogue committees which

    should have been formed by the NCCE in the ten regions of the country and the one hundred and seventy (170) districts were not completed due to lack of funds.

    The Committee noted that these programmes were intended to provide a platform for information sharing among political parties and key stakeholders and to promote tolerance and healthy political party campaign among others. Due to lack of funds, the Commission had to contain its areas of operation to potential flash- points to the detriment of other electoral areas.

    In the opinion of the Committee, the continuous lack of funds for educational programmes serves as a major threat to the mandate of the Commission. To enable the Commission implement and oversee its educational programmes, the Committee recommends that the Government must ensure that the NCCE is adequately resourced in future budgets to empower the NCCE to inculcate in the citizenry, the awareness of their civic responsibilities and an appreciation of their rights and obligations.

    Conclusion

    Undoubtedly, the NCCE plays a major role in the democratic dispensation of the country. For the NCCE to be vibrant, it is necessary that it is adequately resourced to enable it carry out its mandate effectively.

    In the opinion of the Committee, the amount allocated to the Commission for the year 2013 is inadequate. The Committee therefore, urges MoF to allocate additional funds to the Commission should there be a supplementary budget. The Committee also urges the Commission to ensure

    judicious use of the amount it has been allocated for the implementation of its programmes and activities.

    Finally, the Committee recommends to the House for approval, the sum of eighteen million, one hundred and three thousand, one hundred and forty-nine cedis (GH¢18,103,149.00) for the NCCE for the 2013 fiscal year.

    Respectfully submitted.
    Mr Joe K. Gidisu (NDC -- Central Tongu) 4:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to support the Motion by making a few comments.
    Mr Speaker, the NCCE stands out as one of the major pillars for promoting democracy which has been the cornerstone of governance in the country. This had been demonstrated by the activities for specific national events, especially during last year when innovations were introduced to promote transparent and effective elections that we went through. It is undisputed that the NCCE, especially when empowered, could go a long way to do more than they are doing.
    It is on this note that I would want to appeal to my Hon Colleague Members of Parliament that a lot could be done at our constituency and district levels through whatever little support we could give to the NCCE in promoting our activities.
    As of now, there is a very strong discourse, especially down there as to what are the main and core responsibilities of MPs against other organs of Government at the distr icts and constituency levels but with little support that Members of Parliament (MPs) could give to the NCCE, could go a long way to at least, enlighten the public and for that matter, our electorates as to what are our core mandates and what we
    Dr Matthew O. Prempeh (NPP -- Manhyia South) 4:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, something, very interesting is happening to the National Commission for Civic Education (NCCE) -- compensation, item 1. Something very interesting .
    In 2012, they were given just around GH¢5 million in the budget; the actuals was nearly five times -- GH¢23 million. Mr Speaker, it could not have been only arrears that accounted for that -- from GH¢5 million to GH¢23 million. Granted that it was adjusted for Single Spine Salary Structure -- but it is nearly five times.
    Mr Speaker, based upon whatever is happening, they projected that this year's compensation would be about GH¢26 million, but they have been given GH¢14 million. Mr Speaker, either something drastically wrong has happened somewhere or we have to look at the figures again. It is just not either salaries -- single spine or anything Mr Speaker -- and I am afraid it is running through this whole budget.

    Mr Speaker, what does NCCE do? Their mandate is to promote civic education in our understanding and commitment to democracy and inculcate in the citizenry, the awareness of their r ights and obligations. Again, it is a service agency. Their service budget has been cut by about 30 per cent. [Interruption.] Mr Speaker, the former Majority Leader -- former Government --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, just go ahead with your contribution. [Laughter.]
    Dr Prempeh 4:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, he has decided to be bullying Members of the opposite side. Mr Speaker, he has even said in this House that when you use the words “judgement debts” you have to withdraw. Mr Speaker, judgement debt has never appeared in any court --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:30 p.m.
    That issue has been ruled upon. Please, proceed.
    Dr Prempeh 4:30 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Speaker, nobody can contest your ruling. Your ruling stands. Mr Speaker, no judgement debt was mentioned in your ruling.
    Mr Speaker, I would like the Hon Minister for Finance to take note, that he has to take a second look at how budget estimates are brought to this House. This is because it looks like this budget is being programmed for a supplementary budget. I do not think we have to encourage the Minister for Finance to be bringing supplementary budgets. The right thing must be done and be done the first time -- granted that to err is human.
    Mr Speaker, if you cut the NCCE budget by 30 per cent, do you want Ghanaians to inculcate the tenets of democracy? Do they not want us to know our rights and obligations? Do they not
    want inter-party dialogue to be facilitated? Obviously, Mr Speaker, I do not want to say that because the Hon Minister for Finance is not a Member of Parliament, he does not believe in inter-party dialogue. But those of us here, we know the essence of inter-party dialogue, which is reflected in committee meetings.
    So, Mr Speaker, budgets must be done and done rightly in the first place, not pretend to wait for a supplementary budget which may or may not come.
    Mr Speaker, I support the Motion.
    Mr Mathias K. Ntow (NDC -- Aowin ) 4:30 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for allowing me to contribute to the Motion.
    Mr Speaker, we are all aware that the NCCE is one of the institutions mandated by the Constitution of this Republic to take care of political education in this country, but it seems they are handicapped. Looking at the budget of last year and even this year, who knows, whether what they have put down, the moneys would be released to them.
    So, Mr Speaker, just as Hon Papa Owusu-Ankomah said -- “I would want to urge the Minister for Finance” -- he re-emphasised and re-echoed that “I would urge” so, I am urging the Hon Minister for Finance, that the NCCE -- if you come to my constituency, it is completely handicapped. They do not have even a single bicycle to work with. So, I would want to plead with the Hon Minister to ensure that --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, are you sure of what you are saying? Bicycles?
    Mr Ntow 4:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would not lie to this Honourable House. I believe other areas might have -- [Interruption.]
    Dr Prempeh 4:30 p.m.
    On a point of order.
    Mr Speaker, if the Hon Mathias Ntow, my senior Brother cares to know, the car the Chairperson of NCCE rode to Parliament House to come and defend the budget is an NCCE vehicle.
    So, when he says not even a bicycle, maybe, he wants to exaggerate. In the era of gargantuan things, maybe, when he says it is a bicycle, we should take it that he means a car. Just like how somebody said somewhere --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, your point is well made.
    Hon Ntow, please, go ahead.
    Mr Ntow 4:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I do not know whether my good Friend, Hon Prempeh is saying that she came from the district or she came from the headquarters. There is a vast difference between activities at the headquarters and activities at the district level. I am speaking from the district level. But it would be unfortunate if -- [Interruption.]
    Some Hon Members 4:30 p.m.
    Which district?
    Mr Ntow 4:30 p.m.
    The district is Aowin District in the Western Region of the Republic of Ghana.
    Mr Speaker, it would be very, very unfortunate if at the headquarters in Accra, the boss does not have a car; she should have it. But I am very much concerned about what is taking place at the district level. That is my concern.
    So, Mr Speaker, since our Hon Minister is here, we would want to urge him, that this year, 2013, something should be done about the logistics of NCCE, so that they would be able to carry out their constitutionally mandated obligation, which is educating the general public on our democratic dispensation.
    I thank you.
    Ms Freda A. O. Prempeh (NPP -- Tano North) 4:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I hope this is not dum so dum so matter -- Thank you, Mr Speaker for giving me the opportunity -- [Interruption.]
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, please, proceed.
    Ms Prempeh 4:30 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for giving me the opportunity to contribute to the Motion on the floor.
    Mr Speaker, the role of the NCCE cannot be over-emphasised. When you look at its mandate -- [Interruption.] I am not reading; I am referring to the Report.
    The role of the NCCE cannot be over- emphasised. They play a very important role in educating the public, especially during District Assembly elections and general elections and they undertake a number of public educational programmes.
    Mr Speaker, looking at the budget submitted for 2013, the amount requested is GH¢33,325,451 and the amount allocated to the NCCE is GH¢18,103,149. Mr Speaker, you would agree with me that this is woefully inadequate for an institution, or an organisation like the NCCE.
    When we sit back, we always accuse them that they are not doing their work well. I am even surprised to hear that their 185 people are housed in five rooms at the Electoral Commission's Office. Mr Speaker, the health implications about this number of people in five rooms should also be taken care of.
    Mr Speaker, I would plead with the Ministry of Finance to look into the budget of NCCE very seriously. This is
    because if they request for an amount of GH¢26,241,951 for salaries and you cut it down to GH¢14 million, which is almost about 50 per cent of what they requested for, Mr Speaker, I think that is not good enough.
    Mr Speaker, for goods and services and even for assets -- now, the NCCE, they have to be housed in their own office accommodation. I do not think they can work effectively as it is required of them if they should continue to work from five rooms given to them by the Electoral Commission. We expect them to work very hard and effectively and educate us on our public and national issues, especially pertaining to politics.
    But what do we see? Their budgets have always been cut down and this time round, it is more than almost 50 per cent, which is not good enough.
    Mr Speaker, on this note, I would want to urge the Minister for Finance -- we are not expecting other institutions and organisations to come bombarding this House with supplementary budgets but from the look of things, the way their budgets are being cut from one Ministry to another, I am afraid, very soon, they will come out with a lot of supplementary budgets.
    Mr Speaker, before I end, I would want to finally talk about the way their moneys are released to them; because sometimes they get the moneys very late and it hampers effective and efficient running of the institutions. We should see the NCCE as an institution which plays a very serious and pivotal role in our civic education programmes.
    But unfortunately, it looks like their activities have been relegated to the background and you do not even see what they are doing in the regional capitals, and in the district capitals. They can only work effectively when they are adequately and well resourced.

    So on this note, I would want to urge the Minister for Finance to take a critical look at the budget of the NCCE and approve of the amount that they are requesting for, which is about -- now, they have been allocated GH¢18,103,149.00.

    Thank you very much, Mr Speaker, for this opportunity.

    Question put and Motion agreed to.

    Resolved:

    That this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢18,103, 149.00 for the services of the National Commission for Civic Education (NCCE) for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Dr Benjamin B. Kunbuor 4:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, item number 11, that is in respect of the National Media Commission.
    ANNUAL ESTIMATES 4:40 p.m.

    Minister for Finance (Mr Seth E. Terkpeh) 4:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢2,560,322 for the services of the National Media Commission (NMC) for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    In so doing, I wish to draw attention to the main mandate of the NMC, which is to ensure that there is promotion of free independent and responsible media in the country.
    The NMC has discharged its responsibilities for 2012 and in 2013, it is planning to further deepen this mandate in particular, by the establishment of regional media advisory councils to help
    deal with issues of media responsibility in the ten regions of the country.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move.
    Prof. Gyan-Baffour (on behalf of the
    Chairman of the Committee) 4:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to read the Report of your Committee on behalf of the Chairman of the Committee.
    Introduction
    1.1 The Minister for Finance presented the Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government for the year ending 31st December, 2013 to Parliament on Tuesday, 5th March, 2013 in accordance with article 179 of the 1992 Constitution.
    Subsequently, Mr Speaker referred the annual budget estimates of the NMC to the Special Budget Committee for consideration and report. This was in accordance with Order 140 (4) of the Standing Orders of the House.
    The Committee met on Thursday, 14th March, 2013 with the Executive Secre- tary to the NMC, Mr George Sarpong, officials of the NMC and the Ministry of Finance and considered the es- timates.
    The Committee is grateful to the above mentioned officials for their assistance during its deliberations.
    Reference documents
    The following served as reference documents during the deliberations of the Committee:
    SPACE FOR SUMMARY - 4:40 p.m.

    Ms Laadi Ayii Ayamba (NDC -- Pusiga) 4:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to support the Motion for the approval of the budgetary allocation of GH¢2,560,322 for the services of the National Media Commission.
    Mr Speaker, looking at the activities of the National Media Commission, one would have observed that in honesty, the amount that has been allocated is woefully inadequate. We would all testify to the fact that often when there are shortfalls, the National Media Commission is often called upon to look at media issues, listen and
    try to solve some of these problems. If you look at what they intend to do with the budgetary allocation they had early on asked for, which is GH¢2,385,697.00, you will realise that it was quite reasonable. This is to undertake monitoring, which they had earlier done both in Kumasi and Accra which was not sufficient enough. This is because with media, it covers the whole country and it would have been good if they could even go further to make their point clear, especially with their numerous workers across the country.
    But unfortunately, I believe because of the inadequacy of whatever amount was allocated to them the previous year, they could not do this. They still intend to continue with this activity.
    One other activity they want to undertake, is to get to conflict areas where it is very important, that certain issues which most people who are engaged in conflicts do not take into consideration, could have been drummed into their ears. This is because the issue of conflict has put so many places behind and we need to put in more education and for the media to continue travelling and working with people on the ground to make sure that these conflicts at least, are abated.
    Mr Speaker, I have seen most people who are under the National Media Commission -- Often you will realise that means of transport becomes a problem for them when they are to undertake certain activities. Whoever wants them at a place has to provide, sometimes the means of transport for them -- even if you have issues, which is not the best.
    So, Mr Speaker, I wish to suggest, that, notwithstanding the fact that I am suggesting that we approve of the amount that has been allocated, the
    difference, if not all, but part of it -- It should be looked at and the Minister for Finance and with all humility, should support them, so that they can come up.
    With this, Mr Speaker, I support the Motion.
    Dr Prempeh 4:50 p.m.
    -- rose --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:50 p.m.
    Hon Matthew Prempeh, have you taken a contract to be contributing to every one of these Motions?
    It is just by the side.
    Dr Matthew O. Prempeh (NPP -- Manhyia South) 4:50 p.m.
    I know. We are doing Government business now, notwith- standing the cut in the NCCE budget, we are doing Government business. [Laughter.]
    Mr Speaker, I would like to draw the Hon Minister for Finance's attention to another discrepancy I cannot explain. The budget given to NCCE for compensation in 2012 was GH¢1.8 -- actually, GH¢1,849,378, which actual remittances were even more than that. Mr Speaker, how on earth can an organistion's budget in one year be GH¢1.8 million and after single spine and arrears, the Minister for Finance proposes to pay them GH¢286,432 this year.
    It is totally impossible -- even the Salaga Member of Parliament understands, no matter his ingenuity in creative accountancy, cannot manage to let this happen. That is why I am saying that if we are not careful, we are pre- programming this budget for a failure. If you want to reduce Government budget deficits and attain certain targets -- and the one that you cannot even decide not to pay -- compensation, item one of the budget, we got it so wrong in our budget estimates -- [Interruptions.] There is nothing like Labour Commission here; get your facts right.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:50 p.m.
    Hon Member, address the Chair.
    Dr Prempeh 4:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, that is my problem and the composition of the NMC is statutory. That is my worry; you gave them GH¢1.8 million last year and even that, you gave them actually more than GH¢1.8 million to cater for single spine and whatever. And now, this year, you have pre-programmed to give them GH¢286,000.00. Outright, your budget proposals are skewed.
    Alhaji Amadu B. Sorogho 4:50 p.m.
    On a point of Order.
    Mr Speaker, I think there is a serious statement that the Hon Member has made and some of these things you must -- When the Hon Member made it, he watched me. He says “no wonder FM stations are being jammed” -- It is a very serious statement he has made. If he knows those who are jamming the FM stations, he has to say it, so that we stop it. Mr Speaker, this is a very serious statement from a Member of Parliament
    -- 4:50 p.m.

    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:50 p.m.
    Hon Matthew Prempeh, can you substantiate the allegation?
    Dr Prempeh 4:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I do not know where my Hon Colleague for Madina is coming from. All I said was “no wonder FM stations are being jammed”. He has misrepresented this simple English to mean that the stations' frequencies have

    been jammed. I am talking about telephone call-ins jamming the lines.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:50 p.m.
    No, Hon Matthew Prempeh, its ordinary meaning cannot be stretched that far. [Laughter.]
    Dr Prempeh 4:50 p.m.
    Anyway, Mr Speaker, even if I have gone to his interpretation -- “who the cap fits, let him wear it”.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:50 p.m.
    Hon Member, if you cannot substantiate, please, withdraw it.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 4:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, on a very serious and sensitive matter, there has been a ruling from this Chair that “he who the cap fits, let him wear it”. So, if my Hon Colleague is just quoting that, what offence has he committed?
    Mr Joe K. Gidisu 4:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the other day when I said, when they said the ugliest animal was going to die and the monkey started to cry, my Hon Colleagues opposite started crying in the same way that they want to portray Hon Sorogho. So “who the cap fits” is a situation which also amounts to the ugliest animal was going to die and the monkey on the other side started crying.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:50 p.m.
    Hon Matthew Prempeh, please, just withdraw and let us make progress.
    Dr Prempeh 4:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, what I meant by “FM stations have been jammed”, if the Hon Member wants further and better particulars -- I intended it to be a harmless political statement but Mr Speaker, if you want me to give further and better particulars, I will give further and better particulars. We are in this country --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:50 p.m.
    I have not requested for further and best particulars. [Laughter.] I said you should withdraw it.
    rose
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:50 p.m.
    Hon Hammond, you do not have the floor.
    Hon Matthew Prempeh, please, go ahead and withdraw it.
    Mr Hammond 4:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, this is a point of --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 4:50 p.m.
    Hon Hammond, you are out of order. Please, resume your seat.
    Hon Matthew Prempeh, please, go ahead.
    Dr Prempeh 4:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I withdraw the words “FM stations jammed” and replace them with “frequency modulators stations are being jammed by incessant interferance.”
    Mr Speaker, on a more serious note, Hon Leadership of the House, we must take our budget oversight responsibility serious. Time and again, we are laying Papers where the figures just do not add up and I am using this third occasion to draw the Hon Minister for Finance's attention, that even before we go to assets or goods and services, 80 per cent of the Item 1 of this year's budget does not reflect the reality. That even the payments that were made have been cut and cut so badly. That if we are going to rely on the figures here, our budget targets are not going to be met.
    I am not being a prophet of doom but if last year, we gave the National Media Commission (NMC) GH¢1.8 million and we have not even taken cognizance of inflation this year -- I can understand why -- [Interruption] -- All right, Mr Speaker, he said we should not say “judgment debts” -- The money has been given to “other government obligations” such that what Ghanaians want and believe in, has been severely cut.
    Hon Minister for Finance, listen and listen well, and look at your budget estimates again.
    Mr Richard M. Quashigah (NDC -- Keta) 5 p.m.
    Thank you so much, Mr Speaker, for the opportunity to contribute to the approval of the estimates of the National Media Commission.
    Mr Speaker, it is clear that the work of the National Media Commission is very crucial to the development of our democracy. It is said that in an environment where there is a free media, it must come with some degree of responsibility, and if that responsibility is absent, then clearly, what it means is that the freedom that the media has, would become a monster that would consume the democracy that we have.
    It is in that vein that there is the need for us as a society, as a nation, to really consider the work of the National Media Commission very important. We all know too well that the democracy of Ghana, today, has become the envy of many in the sub-region and it is for us to jealously guard it, and the only way by which we can guard it, is to ensure that the Commission that has that oversight responsibility over the media is well resourced and well equipped in order to do its work well.
    rose
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5 p.m.
    Hon K. T. Hammond, is it on a point of order?
    Mr Hammond 5 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, a very serious point of order.
    Did I rightly hear my Friend say that the democracy that we have has become the enemy of many in the sub-region?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5 p.m.
    He used the word “envy”.
    Mr Hammond 5 p.m.
    Thank you very much.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5 p.m.
    Please, Hon Quashigah, proceed.
    Mr Quashigah 5 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am sure my Colleague on the other side, obviously, has some challenge with hearing and probably, would need a hearing aid -- [Laughter.]
    rose
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5 p.m.
    Hon Member, please, withdraw that portion of your presentation.
    Mr Quashigah 5 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I withdraw that portion of it; it was meant to be on the lighter side.
    Mr Speaker, the NMC is supposed to be monitoring happenings in the media but the question is, if we reflect carefully over the years, has it been able to do that effectively? And if it has not been able to do that effectively, then must we not as we progress into the future do all we can to resource them effectively in order to discharge that duty?
    Mr Speaker, I think that today, if the NMC were to be doing its work effectively as a result of being well equipped and well resourced, I am sure that a lot of the challenges that we have in the media which
    tend to affect the forward march of our democracy would have gradually become a thing of the past. Mr Speaker, I would crave the indulgence, humbly, of the Minister for Finance to take a look again as has already been suggested by some Hon Members, at the budget allocation for the NMC, because to my mind, it is the pivot on which our democracy rests.
    With these few words, Mr Speaker, I support the Motion.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5 p.m.
    Thank you very much.
    The last contribution.
    Mr Frank Annoh-Dompreh (NPP -- Nsawam-Adoagyiri) 5 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you for the opportunity to contribute to the Motion on the floor.
    Mr Speaker, I think it has dawned on all of us as a country that in our forward- march in consolidating our democratic credentials, the media plays a critical role. To that end, the activities of the NMC cannot be compromised in any way. Mr Speaker, with your indulgence, I recall with relish the repeal of the Criminal Libel Law -- [Hear! Hear!] -- by the NPP Government, when Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo was the Attorney-General -- [Interruption.]
    Mr Bagbin 5 p.m.
    On a point of order.
    Mr Speaker, the repeal of the Criminal Libel Law was done by this House. It was this House that passed the law repealing the Criminal Libel Law. It was not by the NPP Government; it was by this House, this Parliament. If his submission is that a Bill was submitted to the House, that would be stating a fact. But as for repealing it, it was by an Act of Parliament passed by this House that repealed the law.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5 p.m.
    Hon Member, can you amend your presen- tation to suit what he has said? It was presented by a particular Government but it was repealed by this House.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 5 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I think that it is a bit needless for us to go into Governments --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5 p.m.
    Hon Member, I hope you do not want to belittle the powers of this House to which you yourself belong. It is the House that has the power to repeal.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 5 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is a statement of fact that the Bill was laid by Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo as the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice. That is a statement of fact.
    In moving forward, Mr Speaker, it is sad and it is regrettable --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5 p.m.
    Hon Member, I do not want us to be dragging these things unduly. It was presented or laid by him as Attorney-General and Minister for Justice then but it was this House that repealed it.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 5 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I agree entirely with the position of the Hon Member for Nadowli/Kaleo, that indeed, it was this House that through an Act of Parliament repealed the previous arrangement. It is this House.
    Mr Speaker, the act of legislation is not a shared business, it is Parliament that does it. So, I agree entirely with the Hon Member for Nadowli/Kaleo.
    But having said that, Mr Speaker, in the Interpretations Act, a former Attorney- General and Minister for Justice, in a spir ited effort in this House -- Mr Speaker, I do not want to draw you into this -- but in your former capacity, you agreed with the then Attorney-General and Minister for Justice that indeed, it is a shared responsibility. But I do not want to drag you into this.
    Mr Speaker, I rest it.
    Dr Kunbuor 5:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, since we are all in a learning process, it is important that our functions in government and interrelationships have to be understood a bit more clearly.

    I do know that in this country, as political practice, we have NPP Government, NDC Government, PNP Government. But as far as the Parliament of Ghana is concerned, there is no NPP Parliament and there is no NDC Parliament. And if the legislative power is still vested in this Parliament, as it was before, then it is clear that it was this House that actually passed the Criminal Libel Law.

    So, the allusion by the Hon Member in connecting Governments with that legislative Act as the Hon Minority Leader rightly said, is not a useful exercise for the record of this House. And that is the part where the difficulty is. But I have noticed that he has veered it within the context of a Bill.

    The education process should go further, that even if a Bill is called by any type of person, even including -- Let me hold it there -- and it is laid before this House, it becomes the property of the House, and that is significant.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    Hon Member, I want this debate to come to an end.
    Please, conclude your presentation. But just amend the presentation to show that it was this House that repealed it, but it could have been initiated by some particular Government.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 5:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, yes, I agree the House passed it but it is also a statement of fact that Nana Addo Dankwa Akuffo-Addo was then the Minister of the Attorney-General at that time. That is a statement of fact. And he laid it before the House.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    Hon Member, he was not “Minister of the Attorney-General”; he was “Hon Attorney- General and Minister for Justice.”
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 5:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you very much.

    Nii Amasah Namoale: Mr Speaker, the Hon Member is refusing to amend his statement. It is something not above God -- because anyway, whoever was the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice at that time could still have laid the same Bill -- [Interruption] -- This is because the Bill emanated from the Presidency and it was given to him. So, he has not done anything extraordinary. Nana Addo Dankwa Akuffo-Addo did not do anything extraordinary. It was the normal thing he did.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    Hon Member, please, conclude your presentation; please, conclude.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 5:10 p.m.
    I am saddened Mr Speaker, that the National Media Commission is not, as a statement of fact, replicated in the various regions of Ghana and if as a country, we are marching towards consolidating our democracy --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    Are you sure that the NMC is not replicated --
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 5:10 p.m.
    Yes, the National Media Commission is not replicated in the regions.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    All right.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 5:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, that is a statement of fact.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    Please, wind up because time is running out.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 5:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, with your kind indulgence, I am just winding up.

    So, in marching towards consolidated democracy, it is critical that offices of the National Media Commission are opened across the regions in the country.

    Mr Speaker, one more point, that is so critical, is a shortfall --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    Hon Member, you have had more than enough time, so, please --
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 5:10 p.m.
    In winding up, the state-of-the-art equipment procured by the National Media Commission are lying in a state that is not good enough. They need to be housed in fully air- conditioned structures, which will ensure their effective work. So, I would want to make a passionate appeal to the Government to provide the needed funding to ensure that this state-of-the - art equipment procured --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    The point is well made.
    Mr Annoh-Dompreh 5:10 p.m.
    Thank you very much.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Resolved:
    That this Honouable House approves the sum of GH¢2,560,322 for the services of the National Media Commission (NMC) for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Dr Kunbuor 5:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we can take items 12 and 14 --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    Item 12 then, Hon Minister for Finance -- That is to do with the Labour Commission.
    rose
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    The Motion has been moved and seconded, it has been voted upon.
    Mr Hammond 5:10 p.m.
    It is an entirely different matter I wanted to bring to your attention and you would not call me.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    All right, you have the floor.
    Mr Hammond 5:10 p.m.
    Thank you very much.
    Mr Speaker, in all seriousness and sincerity, let there be fairness in this House. Mr Speaker, somebody gets up to speak and Hon Members go for his juggler and the person literally makes just one statement and the Chair calls on the person to sum up and round up and conclude. Mr Speaker, how does that person -- [Interruption] -- does not have control over Hon Members who want to throttle him -- Mr Speaker, let us be fair.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    Hon Member, your point is well taken.
    Mr Hammond 5:10 p.m.
    Thank you.
    Dr Kunbuor 5:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, my attention has been drawn to the fact that not all Hon Members have the Committee's Report, so we can take item 14 and then crosscheck that quickly.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:10 p.m.
    Item 14 -- Public Services Commission, Hon Minister for Finance --
    ANNUAL ESTIMATES, 2013
    Public Services Commission
    Minister for Finance (Mr Seth E. Terkpeh) 5:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this Honourtable House approves the sum of GH¢5,052,559 for the services of the Public Services Commission (PSC) for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Mr Speaker, in moving this Motion, I need not belabour the point that the Public Services Commission performs a very critical role in the Public Services as the overall body that overlooks policy formulation and various human resource as well as other policies for the Commission.
    The Commission's mandates are quite clear, which includes the strengthening of linkages between the institutions of Government, which includes the Civil Service.
    Mr Speaker, with these few words, I beg to move.
    Question proposed.
    Prof. George Y. Gyan-Baffour (on behalf of the Chairman of the Committee) 5:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, on behalf of the Chairman, I will read the Report of your Committee.
    Introduction
    The Minister for Finance, Hon Seth E.Terkpeh presented the Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government for the year ending 31st December, 2013 to Parliament on Tuesday, 5th March, 2013 in accordance with article 179 of the 1992 Constitution.
    In accordance with Order 140 (4) of the Standing Orders of the House, Mr Speaker referred the annual budget estimates of the Public Services Commission (PSC) to the Special Budget Committee for consideration and report.
    The Committee met with the Acting Chairperson of the PSC, Mrs Bridget Katsriku, officials of the PSC and the Ministry of Finance on Wednesday, 12th March, 2013 and considered the referral.
    Prof. George Y. Gyan-Baffour (on behalf of the Chairman of the Committee) 5:10 p.m.


    In the light of the above, the Committee recommends to the House for approval, the sum of five million, fifty-two thousand, five hundred and fifty-nine cedis (GH¢5,052, 559.00) for the implementation of the programmes and activities of the Public Services Commission for the 2013 financial year.

    Respectfully submitted.
    Mr Alban S. K. Bagbin (NDC -- Nadowli/Kaleo) 5:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to support the Motion and in doing so, just raise a few critical issues.
    First, Mr Speaker, it is not clear from the Report what the actuals were for 2012. What we have is the provision for 2012, which was GH¢3,598,483.70.

    It is there, GH¢13.598,483.70; that is what I am reading. If that is the case, then the figure of GH¢5,052,559, which is what is provided for this year will definitely not meet even one-quarter of the needs of the Commission. So, I understand why the Committee is urging that the IGFs be given to the Commission in toto, that the hundred per cent that they generate be given to the Commission.

    But Mr Speaker, there comes my second issue. It can only be done after the law has been revised. The Minister for Finance himself cannot just decide that the IGFs be given to the Public Services Commission. The Ministry would have to bring a law here for us to consider and decide whether we would give 20 per cent or 100 per cent or whatever. There is a law

    on the use of IGFs. And so, the recommendation given should take note of the fact that it has to be done by this House by legislation.

    Mr Speaker, with this, I support the Motion.
    Mr Boniface Gambila Adagbila (NPP--Nabdam) 5:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, at the end of my observations, I intend to support the Motion in favour of the PSC.
    Mr Speaker, having listened to previous presentations about the estimates of various bodies including PSC, one thing that comes to mind is that there seems to be some sort of financial losses in the preparation and presentation of budgets.
    Mr Seth Terkpeh 5:20 p.m.
    On a point of order.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to correct the notion that the exercise of budgeting is just about cutting. We do follow due process, which is to have hearings and we operate within a budget envelope, which is defined with the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA), donors and others as well as loans provided to the nation. And it is within this context -- if we were to allow any amount that would be requested, I believe that we would be leading the country to a very disastrous consequence.
    Mr Adagbila 5:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I think the Hon Finance Minister is about singing the same song with me. All I try to establish is --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, veer off that line and proceed with your contribution.
    Mr Adagbila 5:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, all I would have hoped is to tell the institution, do a budget of GH¢10 million and they would do a budget of GH¢10 million, not GH¢20 million and you would cut it, wasting people's time --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, please, withdraw that portion about “wasting people's time.”
    Mr Adagbila 5:30 p.m.
    I withdraw it honourably, Mr Speaker.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Thank you.
    Mr Adagbila 5:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the business of the Public Service is very important and if you will allow me to quote a couple of phrases from their mandate, you will hear:
    “The PSC exists to safeguard and promote integrity, accountability and competence in the Public Services in Ghana.”
    The other phrase to quote under the mandate of the PSC says:
    “To be a Public Services Commis- sion whose guidelines and advice results in a well managed workforce capable of and committed to delivering high quality services to the people of Ghana.”
    Mr Speaker, these phrases tell us how important the PSC is in this country, yet the budget for the Public Services Commission is woefully inadequate.
    Processes, systems, procedures in the Public Services, the Civil Service, appear to rather promote in this country a kind of negative work culture, a kind of
    -- 5:30 p.m.

    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, we do not work for 60 years, you retire at 60 years.
    Mr Adagbila 5:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am citing a situation where workers retire at 60 years and they are not notified by the system or by the procedures of the Public Service, the Civil Service. All these, I am stating because if the system works well, by the time you get to 60 years, you would have been informed in advance and you would have been preparing ahead to retire and all that will take you away from spending your resources and getting poor.
    Mr Speaker, in conclusion, when we look at page 7, we would note that it talks of inadequate budgetary allocation to the Public Services Commission. You will note that as of 2012 and as shown in the document --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, please, wind up.
    Mr Adagbila 5:30 p.m.
    Yes, Mr Speaker, I will do so.
    In winding up, in cutting all these budgetary requests by the Public Service, you will note that the Public Services Commission is likely to under perform and if it under performs, we will come to see situations where, as I watched on the Public Accounts Committee video show, where Public Service -- [Uproar.] Please, listen --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, your time is up.
    Mr Adagbila 5:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, where is the Public Accounts Committee --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Please, resume your seat.
    Mr Adagbila 5:30 p.m.
    Where the Public Accounts Committee had a witness --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, resume your seat; your time is up.
    Mr Adagbila 5:30 p.m.
    Yes, Mr Speaker. We had a witness that the Public Services --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Your time is up, Hon Member.
    Mr Adagbila 5:30 p.m.
    That the Public Services bodies overpaid moneys to people who are --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, respect the Chair; your time is up. Resume your seat.
    Mr Adagbila 5:30 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Yes, any more contributions?
    rose
    Mr Joseph Y. Chireh (NDC -- Wa West) 5:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you very much.
    We know that the Public Services Commission is one of the very important institutions to ensure that quality manpower is recruited for our Public Services. It is very important for us to support them, so that the kind of interviews they conduct, the way they recruit, should go to strengthen the unity of this country. What do I mean by that?
    We need to have sufficient notices and for people who have the requisite qualification to be given the opportunity, no matter where they come from, to be in the Public Services in order that we have a nation that can perform.
    Over the years, the work of the Commission has been hampered by lack of resources. They ought to have equipment that will help them do the work. But fortunately, Mr Speaker, as you know, they are one of the organisations, that if we amend the Constitution, will be benefiting from the Democracy Fund. If we get that Fund and support them adequately, they will be able to do the work that we all expect them to do.
    Indeed, my Hon Colleague who before me was talking about working for 60 years and was talking about video show and laughing -- he was even talking at one point about singing. We talk in the House; we do not sing.
    In my view, it is important that we give support to the Public Services Commis- sion. And because it is a constitutional body, Mr Speaker, if you look at the terms and conditions of those who are members,
    they are similar to the conditions that we have with the High Court and the Court of Appeal. It is the importance that we give them. But if you have this high quality people sitting there without equipment, without the resources, it is not good.
    That is why I would urge the Hon Finance Minister, that he should look at their budget and also look at other sources of funding to support them since his envelope is too small.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:30 p.m.
    Thank you very much.
    The last contributor will be Hon Matthew Prempeh.
    Dr Matthew O. Prempeh (NPP -- Manhyia South) 5:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to support the budget allocated for the Public Services Commission. Mr Speaker, I support it with a very, very heavy heart because there is very little probably, we can do as now.
    Mr J. K. Gidisu 5:30 p.m.
    On a point of order.
    Mr Speaker, my very good Hon Friend, this evening, has contracted himself just to focus on only budgetary cuts, which as of now, do not make any very serious impact as a result of all the references he has been making. I think he has registered his point for the National Media Commission and those other Commissions. So, for him to be repeating the same budgetary cuts, is just ridiculous --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:40 p.m.
    Hon Member, you are out of order.
    Please, proceed.
    Dr Prempeh 5:40 p.m.
    Thank you. Mr Speaker. Indeed, his microphone is still on.
    Mr Speaker, not long ago, we heard an Hon Member say that an Hon Member's knowledgeable, incisive contribution, he regarded it as a song. Not long ago, we heard an Hon Member tell another Hon Member whose contribution had been well researched, that it is laughable, that he was laughing. Yes, he said he was laughing. [Interruption.] He said he was laughing, Mr Speaker --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:40 p.m.
    Hon Member, address the Committee's Report that is before us.
    Dr Prempeh 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, but in this House, we recognise those whose contributions make us laugh. Mr Speaker, when you cut the budgets of regulators and an Hon Member gets up and says, I have been contracted -- Yes, my onerous responsibility to the good people of Ghana and Manhyia South who brought me here, is to participate on the Committee that I serve, which is the Special Budget Committee and we are supposed to guard State resources --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:40 p.m.
    Hon Member, concentrate on the Report before us.
    Dr Prempeh 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I can understand, in his other life, he was awarding contracts, so, he thinks everything is contract. Mr Speaker, I will not go there, I will concentrate as you have directed.
    Mr Speaker, what we have seen today is very, very serious and I would like us, after a good laugh, to address this matter with the Ministry of Finance, the last four Motions we have carried.
    CHRAJ is the social protector for all of us, it has been cut by over 40 per cent --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:40 p.m.
    You have already made that point; please, move on.
    Dr Prempeh 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, one of the pillars of President John Dramani Mahama's Government -- [Hear! Hear!] -- is human resource development and the prime Commission that is to promote human resource development is the Public Services Commission.
    Alhaji Amadu B. Sorogho 5:40 p.m.
    On a point of order.
    Mr Speaker, I really have regretted an action that just happened.
    Mr Speaker, Hon Prempeh is my very good Friend and he came to me and asked me, “Alhaji, the four pillars, is human resource one of them” and I said, “Of course, human resource is part of it.” That is just five minutes ago. Now, he gets up, five minutes later, having got this information, he is now trying to castigate the Government --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:40 p.m.
    Hon Member, it does not amount to a point of order.
    Alhaji Sorogho 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, he must seek the information and use it well and stop trying to misuse the information I gave him.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:40 p.m.
    Hon Prempeh, proceed.
    Dr Prempeh 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, Hon Amadu Sorogho, Member of Parliament for Madina, just said about two minutes ago that --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:40 p.m.
    We want to leave that behind. Let us move ahead.
    Dr Prempeh 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it cracked a big laughter here, so I was going to make reference to my earlier statement.
    Mr Speaker, if one of the fundamental pillars of President Mahama's governance is human resource development and the Minister for Finance brings a budget under the authority of a President whose pillar is human resource and all we can see for the institution, the Commission that is supposed to help us train the Public Services Commission -- [Interruption] -- Yes, you are cutting and cutting and cutting.
    Dr Kunbuor 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, on a point of order.
    I guess the Hon Member was misleading this House because human resource as a pillar of His Excellency the President, I am not very sure about that. There are four pillars, so I would want to know which pillar is the human resource pillar.
    Dr Prempeh 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thought it was not Question and Answer time. But I will answer the Majority Leader 's question, because he is the Leader of Government Business and if the Hon
    Majority Leader forgets that investing in people is human resource development, no wonder the budget, aye basaa.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:40 p.m.
    Hon Members, we bring the debate to a close.
    Hon Minister for Finance, can you sum up?
    Mr Terkpeh 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I wish to wind up by drawing attention to two -- [Interruption.]
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I really do not intend to contribute to the debate but just to address the Minister's mind to some provision in the 2012 Budget, where he so much depended on donor funding for Public Services Commission, about GH¢11 million and he indicated that for 2013, he was expecting GH¢12.5 million donor funding.
    In 2013, he is saying that he is only anticipating GH¢2.2 million. Can he take that on board and explain why? It may explain why their own allocation has come down so drastically.
    Mr Terkpeh 5:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, to take the last point first, I wish to draw attention to the fact that donor funding sometimes is allocated for specific years. They may be multi-year and they may be related to specific activities. So, they are often susceptible to that type of swing which the Minority Leader is talking about.
    Indeed, the budget itself, the outturn for 2012, the shortfall, there was a significant shortfall in donor funding, which has made us cautious in what we put in for 2013, not least, because in 2012, of course, there was the election year phenomenon where you often also see a drop in donor financing.

    Mr Speaker, two points. I think the issue with compensation is an important one and that was why we spent sometime in discussing the situation with the single spine and also proposing some solutions going forward. If you take the Report that was submitted for the NCCE, for example, you would see that out of an allocation of GH¢32 million for 2012 actuals, GH¢23 million of this amount went into Personal Emoluments.

    Similarly, if you took the 2013 projections out of GH¢18 million, a whopping amount of GH¢14 million has gone into compensation; and even the situation we discussed with the National Media Commission, the Committee's own Report at page 4 points out that the officials of NMC informed the Committee that MoF's allocation of GH¢286,432 is insufficient to cater for the salaries of its employees in 2013. As he explained it, the shortfall of GH¢2,099,265 is to cover salary related allowances.

    There are two points on allowances, so -- before I go to the points, the Ministry of Finance explained that a contingency code has been set aside in the budget to cater for shortfalls in employees' compensation. There are two reasons for this: We have been rationalising the allowances for the past two years, moving them, from what used to be the administration, Item 2 to personal emolument, Item 1.

    Therefore, we have been tracking allowances that have been paid by the Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) as part of administration expenses instead of personal emolument.

    But as reported in the Budget, the categories 2 and 3 allowances under the single spine are to be rationalised as the next step in the implementation of the single spine. Therefore, it explains some

    of the differences or differentials that are being seen when we came to the core personal emoluments and allowances. So, with this explanation, I would wish to stress that it is not a question of the Government not paying attention to the human resource element but it is partly the result of rationalisation.

    Mr Speaker, I thank you very much.

    Question put and Motion agreed to.

    Resolved:

    That this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢5,052,559 for the services of the Public Services Commission for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:50 p.m.
    Hon Majority Leader, do you have any more Motions?
    Dr Kunbuor 5:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we take item 12, which is on the National Labour Commission.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:50 p.m.
    Hon Minister for Finance, item 12, National Labour Commission?
    Mr Seth E. Terkpeh 5:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move that --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 5:50 p.m.
    Any seconder?
    Mr Terkpeh 5:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Leader arrested it before I could complete.
    Dr Kunbuor 5:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we have looked at the peculiar circumstances of the Commission and with your indulgence, I would like to move the Motion on this matter.
    Mr Speaker 5:50 p.m.
    All right.
    ANNUAL ESTIMATES 5:50 p.m.

    Minister for Government Business in Parliament/Majority Leader (Dr Benjamin B. Kunbuor) 5:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢2,084,623 for the services of the National Labour Commission for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Mr Speaker, the National Labour Commission is one of the strategic and significant quasi judicial bodies in this country; we have over the years actually witnessed a number of labour disputes and there seems to be a trend towards an escalation towards resolving these issues.
    We know that beyond industr ial disputes, there are also issues about deepening the ongoing and interna- tionalisation and policy formulation of monitory, planning and evaluation at all levels in relation to our labour sector.
    Mr Speaker, it is in the light of these expanded objectives in page 3 of the Committee's Report that this appropriation is being sought.
    Question proposed.
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Joseph Z. Amenowode) 5:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to present the Report of the Committee on the Motion that seeks this House to approve the 2013 Annual Budget Estimates for the National Labour Commission.
    Introduction
    The Hon Minister for Finance, Mr Seth Emmanuel Terkpeh, in accordance with article 179 of the Constitution, presented the Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Government of Ghana for the

    Pursuant to Standing Orders 140 (4) and 184 of the House, Mr Speaker referred the draft annual budget estimates of the National Labour Commission to the Committee on Employment, Social Welfare and State Enterprises for consideration and report to the House.

    Acknowledgement

    The Committee met with the Executive Secretary and officials of the National NMC and deliberated on the 2013 Draft Annual Estimates of the Labour Commission. The Committee is grateful to them for the information and support they provided during deliberations on the estimates.

    Reference documents

    In considering the draft annual estimates for the Commission, the under- listed documents were used as reference materials:

    1. The 1992 Constitution of Ghana.

    2. The Standing Orders of Parliament of Ghana.

    3. The 2012 Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Govern- ment of Ghana.

    4. The 2013 Budget Statement and Economic Policy of the Govern- ment of Ghana.

    5. The 2013 Draft Annual Estimates of the National Labour Commis- sion.

    4.0 Mission Statement of the National Labour Commission

    The mission of the National Labour Commission for the 2013 fiscal year is to
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Joseph Z. Amenowode) 5:50 p.m.
    develop and promote a peaceful and harmonious industr ial relations environment through the use of effective dispute resolution practices within the context of the law, promotion of co- operation among the labour market players and mutual respect for their rights and responsibilities.
    Vision Statement of the National Labour Commission
    The vision of the Commission is to promote a peaceful and harmonious industrial relations environment borne out of the firm understanding of and committed compliance with the Labour Laws by all stakeholders to make the Ghanaian economy competitive to attract investment.
    Strategic Policy Objectives
    The strategic objectives of the National Labour Commission are to:
    facilitate and settle industrial disputes in accordance with the Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651);
    strengthen the capacity of the National Labour Commission to ensure speedy resolution of disputes;
    enforce rules and regulations governing labour administrations, international labour standards and ILO Conventions;
    promote social dialogue among the tripartite partners;
    strengthen the capacity of the tripartite partners;
    build staff capacity through training and development;
    deepen ongoing institution and internationalisation and policy formulation, planning, monitoring and evaluation system at all levels;
    promote and protect the rights and responsibilities of employers and employees;
    increase the capacity of the Judiciary on Act 651 and its Labour Regulations, L.I. 1822 and L.I. 1833;
    improve the capacity of labour mediators and arbitrators; and
    promote an enabling environment and effective regulatory framework for corporate management.
    Review of the Commission's performance In 2012
    6.1 In the 2012 fiscal year, the National Labour Commission was allocated an amount of one million, five hundred and seventy three thousand, one hundred and ninety five Ghana cedis (GH 1,573,195.00) to carry out the following activities:
    a. Settle industrial disputes.
    b. Conduct training on Act 651.
    c. Build capacity of labour mediators and arbitrators.
    d. Sensitise the Judiciary on Act 651.
    e. Train staff of the Commission.
    f. Implement monitoring and evaluation activities.
    g. Refurbish and equip offices of the Commission.
    h. Purchase vehicles for the activities of the Commission.
    Out of the earmarked activities, the Commission was able to: --
    Organise seminars and workshops to train, sensitise and strengthen social partners in social dialogue and tripartism as spelt out in the Labour Act, 2003 (Act
    651).
    The Commission again received a total of six hundred and sixty (660) complaints from individuals, trade unions, workers associations, employers and employees in 2012. Out of complaints received, one hundred and fifty -- one (151) were settled. In addition, 170 outstanding cases rolled over from 2011 were also settled. The Commission also referred 77 cases
    involving over 500 workers for mediation and voluntary arbitration.
    Outlook for 2013
    Funds allocated for the 2013 fiscal year
    For the implementation of activities for 2013 fiscal year, an amount of two million, eighty-four thousand, six hundred and twenty-three Ghana cedis (GH¢2,084,623) has been allocated. Out of this, one million seven hundred and eighty four thousand, six hundred and twenty-three Ghana cedis (GH¢ 1,784,623) is GoG, and ABFA is three hundred thousand Ghana cedis (GH300,000).

    The breakdown of the allocation is as follows:

    SPACE FOR TABLE - PAGE 8 - 5.50P.M.

    Activities for 2013

    The Commission will in 2013 step up its activities by using the alternative dispute resolution processes effectively to settle most of the complaints filed with it. Again, the Commission will strengthen its institutional capacity and that of the mediators and arbitrators.

    To minimise agitations by public sector workers, the Commission would build the capacity of employers and staff in the public sector on the provisions of Act 651.

    The Commission will further produce a docudrama on the provisions of Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651) to be aired on the electronic media to sensitise social partners. The docudrama would be aired
    Mr Kofi Okyere-Agyekum (NPP -- Fanteakwa South) 6 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, there is no doubt that the need for peace at the industrial front is very critical now.
    Mr Speaker, industrial disputes are costly, therefore it is very necessary that the allocation that we give to the National Labour Commission is adequate.
    Mr Speaker, in 2012, the amount that was allocated to the National Labour Commission was GH¢1,573,195.00. Out of this, only GH¢461, 749.00 was released and this is less than 30 per cent.
    rose
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 6 p.m.
    Yes, Hon Member, is it a point of order?
    Dr Donkor 6 p.m.
    Yes, Mr Speaker.
    Dr Donkor 6 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I have heard the term dum so, dum so and I do not know what it is and is it parliamentary -- [Interruptions.]
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 6 p.m.
    Please, go ahead.
    Mr Okyere-Agyekum 6 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I think the last thing that we want, is to add labour disputes to the already bad situation we have in the industrial front, that would obviously reduce our productivity and production to zero. Mr Speaker, in the light of this, I think that it is necessary that adequate allocation is given to the National Labour Commis- sion.
    Labour Commission, Mr Speaker would prevent a lot of labour disputes and those that are already in process, they can reduce them. But if you have a situation where they are given only 30 per cent of what has even been allocated to them, then naturally, that 30 per cent will only go to pay for their salaries and they will not be able to do the needed education of labour employers and even the judges who are to adjudicate in these matters.
    Mr Speaker, it is costing the nation a lot. The National Labour Commission is ready with programmes to train employers and even the judiciary, so that labour disputes would be minimised. But with this kind of allocation, Mr Speaker, I think that all that they are doing, is probably, pay themselves --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 6 p.m.
    Hon Member, wind up!
    Mr Okyere-Agyekum 6 p.m.
    All that they are doing is pay themselves with the little allocations and then not being able to carry out their programmes.
    Mr Speaker, the situation is such that labour disputes appear to be the order of the day rather than the exception. Mr Speaker, this is very costly to the economy --
    Mr Okyere-Agyekum 6 p.m.
    I, therefore, appeal to the Hon Minister for Finance to improve the allocation of the National Labour Commission. I also would want to appeal to the Ministry of Finance that they should pay the teachers, so that at least, they will go back and teach our children. It is a very serious matter and as soon as possible, they should --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 6 p.m.
    Hon Member, your time is up.
    Mr Okyere-Agyekum 6 p.m.
    Thank you very much.
    Mr Joseph N. Bukari(NDC -- Saboba) 6 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for the opportunity to support the Motion, that this House approves a sum of GH¢2,840,623 for the activities of the Labour Commission.
    Mr Speaker, for the past year, the National Labour Commission has done a lot to settle a lot of disputes and complaints brought before it. For this reason, we have a very peaceful labour front and we all are enjoying a peaceful atmosphere in our workplaces.
    Ms Ursula Owusu 6 p.m.
    On a point of order.
    Mr Speaker, if what is happening on the labour front currently is that peaceful, then I do not know what would be turbulent.
    With the greatest respect, teachers are on strike and NAGRAT are on strike; how can this be termed “peaceful conditions” on the labour front? Maybe, the Hon Member should define peace for the education of all of us.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 6 p.m.
    Hon Members, it is a question of opinion.
    Please, proceed, Hon Member.
    Mr Bukari 6 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, for 2012, a lot of disputes were brought before them and they were able to settle them and we had a peaceful labour front. But for 2013, they have lined up a lot of activities to train the various people who play important roles in their activities. Mr Speaker, they intend to sensitise the judiciary on the Labour Act, such that when issues are brought before them, they would be able to arbitrate or mediate effectively. They can only do this if we timely release funds to them.
    So, I would want to urge the Ministry of Finance that they try their best, so that this year, they would be able to timely release funds for the Commission, such that they will be able to carry out their activities they have lined up and that we will see a peaceful labour front and we all will enjoy it.
    With this, I urge the House to support the Motion.
    Thank you.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 6 p.m.
    The last contribution -- Hon Ato Arthur.
    Nana (Dr) Ato S. Arthur (NPP -- Komenda/Edina/Eguafo/Abrem) 6 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to support the Motion on the floor, that is, the Report of the Committee on Employment, Social Welfare and State Enterprises on the annual budget estimates of the National Labour Commission.
    In doing so, Mr Speaker, I would like to refer to bullet .2 of the strategic policy objective of the National Labour Commission, that is, strengthening the capacity of the National Labour Commission to ensure speedy resolution of disputes. The question is, speedy resolution of disputes?
    Mr Speaker, is the “speedy” enough, judging from the numerous industrial disputes today leading to strikes such as
    that of GNAT, NAGRAT and many others threatening to do so. [Interruptions.] Mr Speaker, a way of arresting this situation, was to build the capacity of the labour mediators and arbitrators in order to support the work of the National Labour Commission. But if you look at their allocation for 2012 as of the end of 2012, only 48 per cent of their allocation was received.
    Indeed, the second and third quarter releases for the year 2012 went to the National Labour Commission this year, in January. This is worrying. No wonder today, we are witnessing a lot of industrial disputes. No wonder! But Mr Speaker, what is more worrying is the fact that -- [Interruptions] -- Is the fact that the whole year, 2012, National Labour Commission did not have the opportunity to pay any of their utility bills including that of electricity and so the dum so, dum so we are witnessing today, a number of Government institutions are guilty of this. Mr Speaker, this has contributed largely to the dum so, dum so today [Some Hon Members: oh, oh!] The dum so dum so we do not know when it is going to end, Mr Speaker.
    It is affecting industries. In fact, if the National Labour Commission (NLC) would be able to receive their allocation timeously, Mr Speaker, these numerous industrial disputes in Ghana leading to strikes would be avoided.
    Mr Speaker, just yesterday on air, we learnt that for the fact that teachers were not in school, students had gone to school and were returning home because teachers were not there, they were involved in an accident, three pupils lost their lives. [Oh.] Mr Speaker, in my opinion, it would be important that the
    Minister for Finance would be able to release the funds to NLC timeously and also the Commission itself sees it as a critical point in settling their utility bills, Mr Speaker. -
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 6 p.m.
    Hon Member, that point has been made, so, please, wind up.
    Nana (Dr) Ato Arthur 6 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, in this way, we shall be contributing to solving the dum so canker that has plagued the whole nation, Ghana.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 6:10 p.m.
    Thank you very much, Hon Member.
    Hon Majority Leader, do you want to sum up?
    Dr Kunbuor 6:10 p.m.
    No!
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Resolved:
    That this Honourable House approves the sum of GH¢2,084,623 for the services of the National Labour Commission for the year ending 31st December, 2013.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 6:10 p.m.
    Hon Members, before the House is adjourned, I would like on behalf of Mr Speaker, to thank all Hon Members for staying beyond the prescribed time up to this point -- [No motivation] -- There was some motivation.
    We want to thank you; the House stands adjourned till 10 in the forenoon, tomorrow.
    ADJOURNMENT 6:10 p.m.

  • The House was adjourned at 6.04 p.m. till Wednesday, 20th March, 2013 at 10.00 a.m.