Debates of 29 Mar 2019

MR SPEAKER
PRAYERS 10:10 a.m.

Mr Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Hon Members, Correction of Votes and Proceedings of Thursday, 28th March, 2019.
Page 1…8 --
Mr William A. Quaittoo -- rose
-- 10:10 a.m.

Mr Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Yes, Hon Member.
Mr Quaittoo 10:10 a.m.
Mr Speaker, I have been marked absent on page 8, but if you go to page 21, on the House Committee meeting, my name is second on the list; I was present in the House yesterday.
rose
Ms Ntoso 10:10 a.m.
Mr Speaker, on page 8, Hon Emmanuel Bedzrah, Hon Member for Ho West, was in the Chamber yesterday, but he has been marked absent. Could the Table Office correct that?
rose
- 10:10 a.m.

Mr Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Yes, Hon Member?
Mr Chireh 10:10 a.m.
Mr Speaker, in the Votes and Proceedings I have, after page 16, comes page 7, which has the list of Hon Members who were absent with permission. It continues to page 8. I do not know whether mine was badly clipped or it was --
Mr Speaker 10:10 a.m.
The Table Office should check accordingly.
Page 18…19 --
An Hon Member -- rose --
Mr Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Hon Member, are you standing?
Page 20…23.
Hon Members, in the absence of any other corrections, the Votes and Proceedings of Tuesday, 28 th March, 2019, as corrected is hereby adopted as the true record of proceedings.
Mr Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Hon Members, we have the Official Report dated Wednesday, 27th February, 2019.
Any corrections, please?
Mr Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Hon Members, item listed 3 -- Business Statement.
rose
Mr Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Yes, Hon Minority Chief Whip?
Alhaji Muntaka 10:10 a.m.
Thank you, Mr Speaker.
Mr Speaker, in line with our Standing Orders, any Hon Member of the Business Committee could present the Business Statement on behalf of the Hon Chairman of the Business Committee.
It is unfortunate that when I look round, we do not have any Hon Member on the Business Committee from the Majority Side.
The four of us are Hon Members of the Committee. Hon Ahmed could -- Mr Speaker, better still, we could vary the Business and take Questions with the hope that by the time we finish, an Hon Member or the Hon Chairman of the Business Committee would have arrived to do so.
Mr Speaker 10:10 a.m.
Thank you very much.
Hon Members, item listed 4 -- Hon Minister for Roads and
Highways, you may please take the appropriate seat.
Yes, Hon Member for Domeabra/ Obom?
URGENT QUESTIONS 10:10 a.m.

MINISTRY OF ROADS AND 10:10 a.m.

HIGHWAYS 10:10 a.m.

Minister for Roads and Highways (Mr Kwasi Amoako- Attah) 10:20 a.m.
Background
Mr Speaker, the main Asalaja road which starts from Amasaman in the Ga West Municipality of the Greater Accra Region through Domeabra to Kasoa in the Awutu Senya East Municipality of the Central Region is 33.0 km in length. It is an inter- regional urban road. This road is classified as a major arterial by the Department of Urban Road (DUR). It is a bituminous-surfaced road and in good condition.
Minister for Roads and Highways (Mr Kwasi Amoako- Attah) 10:20 a.m.


Current programme

Traffic Management and Safety measures such as road safety signs, road line markings and speed tables (speed calming measures) to mitigate or minimise vehicular-speed and vehicular-pedestrian accident on this stretch of the road is part of an ongoing contract titled -- “Provision of Road Line Markings and Signs on Asphaltic Overlay Works in Accra, Volta, Brong Ahafo, Eastern, Northern, Upper East, Upper West and Ashanti Regions”.

The work commenced on 14th December, 2016 and was expected to have been completed by 14th

December, 2018; but it has been revised for completion by 14th December, 2019.

However, fixing or installation of street lights on the main road is not part of the original contract. The project is funded by the Ghana Road Fund.

Future Programme

Assessment for installation of street lights on the road had already been carried out for consideration when funds become available.
Mr Speaker 10:20 a.m.
Thank you, Hon Minister.
Hon Member, are you satisfied?
Ms Ackuaku 10:20 a.m.
Yes, Mr Speaker.
Thank you.
Mr Speaker 10:20 a.m.
Question 571, Hon Member for Krachi West.
ORAL ANSWERS TO 10:20 a.m.

QUESTIONS 10:20 a.m.

MINISTRY OF ROADS AND 10:20 a.m.

HIGHWAYS 10:20 a.m.

Minister for Roads and Highways (Mr Kwasi Amoako- Attah) 10:20 a.m.
Mr Speaker,
Background
The road from Dambai Lake Side to Kete Krachi forms part of the Regional road R026 (Apesokubi to Borae Jn trunk road) and Regional road R202 (Kete Krachi to Kpandai trunk road) in the Krachi West District of the newly-created Oti Regon.
The Dambai Lake side to Kete Krachi is 85km in length of which
10km has been upgraded and 75km is on contract for upgrading and reconstruction in three phases under the Cocoa Roads programme.
Current Programme
There are currently three contracts ongoing on the road:
a. Upgrading of Kete Krachi - Buya Road (Km 10 - 30)
This project commenced on 15th May, 2014 and was scheduled for completion on 15th November, 2016. The work is substantially completed. The outstanding works are second sealing, road furniture and roadline markings. As part of the general suspension of projects funded by COCOBOD, the project has been suspended.
b. Upgrading of Kete Krachi - Buya Road (Km 30 - 57)
This project commenced on 14th May, 2016 and was scheduled for completion on 13th March, 2018. The progress of work is projected at 80 per cent physical completion. The main outstanding works are sealing and the provision of road furniture. As part of the general suspension of projects funded by COCOBOD, the project has been suspended. c. Reconstruction of Kete Krachi
- Kpandai - Nakpanyilli Road (Km 51 - 88)
This project commenced on 12th September, 2016 and was scheduled
for completion on 11th September, 2018. The progress of work is projected at 58.94 per cent physical completion.
The contractor is currently undertaking sealing works. The contractor has requested six months extension of time to 12th March, 2019. The employer is currently reviewing the application.
Future Programme
The continuation and completion of the upgrading of Kete Krachi - Buya road depend on the lifting of the suspension of the COCOBOD funded projects on which the Government has taken some decisions, among others, directing the Ministry of Roads and Highways to take over the implementation and supervision of all cocoa road projects with immediate effect.
The reconstruction of Kete Krachi - Kpandai - Nakpanyilli road and Kpandai town roads is progressing steadily.
(ii) Osramani Junction - Osramani and its town roads (3.1km);
(iii) Ehiamankyene Junction- Ehiamankyene and its town roads (7.4km);
(iv) Ntewusu town roads (0.7km).
Minister for Roads and Highways (Mr Kwasi Amoako- Attah) 10:20 a.m.


Background

The Osramani Junction - Osramani and its town roads (3.1km), Ehiamankyene Junction- Ehiamankyene and its town roads (7.4km), and the Ntewusu town roads are located in the Krachi West District of the Oti Region.

Current programme

Mr Speaker, the roads mentioned in the background to this Answer were packaged together with others under a contract titled “Bitumen
Mr Speaker 10:30 a.m.
Hon Member, any follow-up question?
Ms Ntoso 10:30 a.m.
Thank you, Mr Speaker.
Mr Speaker, from the Hon Minister's Answer, this contract was awarded on 12th June, 2016 and commenced on 29th July, 2016, for completion by 29th July, 2018.
Mr Speaker, on page 12 of the Order Paper, looking at the Hon Minister's table that he submitted to this House, clearing and formation has been completed in all of the eight projects -- Osramani road project, Ehiamankyene road project, Ntewusu town roads project, Borae to Chinderi road project, Chinderi to Banda road project and then the Kete Krachi town roads.
Mr Speaker, on page 11 of the Order Paper, the Hon Minister's Answer states that “the Government has taken some decisions, among others, directing the Ministry of Roads and Highways to take over the imple- mentation and supervision of all cocoa road projects with immediate effect”.
I would, therefore, want to know the status of the projects.
Mr Speaker 10:30 a.m.
Yes, Hon Minister?
Mr Amoako-Attah 10:30 a.m.
Thank you, Mr Speaker.
Mr Speaker, as my Hon Colleague herself repeated from my Answer, we have just taken over all suspended COCOBOD roads throughout the country. The current status is that my Ministry is taking inventory of all the suspended COCOBOD roads across the nation. This is being done by all the three agencies, which are the Department of Feeder Roads, the Department of Urban Roads and the Ghana Highway Authority.
Mr Speaker, it is expected that this inventory exercise would end by mid next month, which is the projected period. As soon as that information is collected, collated and sent to my office, I would start a programme of touring all the affected areas. I believe the Hon Member would be glad to hear that I would start from the six newly-created regions, starting from the Oti Region where she is. So, I would engage her and go there with her to start visiting these projects. So, everything is on course.
Mr Speaker, I thank you very much.
Mr Speaker 10:30 a.m.
Hon Member, everything is on course, so let us make progress.
  • [DR
  • Ms Ntoso 10:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, did I hear the Hon Minister say that everything is on course?
    Mr Speaker 10:30 a.m.
    Hon Member, you may ask if you would want to know.
    Ms Ntoso 10:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would just want the Hon Minister to know that these communities were selected for a reason. These are resettlement communities, and the people have sacrificed their lands for the people of this country. All these are resettlement communities, and they have every cause to also benefit from travelling on good roads.
    Mr Speaker, I would also like the Hon Minister to know that most of the yams that are brought to Accra come from this area. So, I would want the Hon Minister to give me a final assurance that after his tour of the regions, starting from the Oti Region, work, especially on pothole patching, would start.
    Mr Speaker, thank you.
    Mr Speaker 10:30 a.m.
    Hon Minister, we would want a firm assurance. The Hon Member only gave us what she considered good reason for the assurance.
    Yes, Hon Minister?
    Mr Amoako-Attah 10:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you.
    Mr Speaker, every single road anywhere in this country is of great importance to the Government,
    including those roads. So, my assurance to everybody, using her question as a reference point, is that every single road in this country is of prime importance, including yours.
    Mr Speaker 10:40 a.m.
    Question numbered
    572?
    Facelift for Kumasi Roads
    Q572. Mr Collins Owusu- Amankwah asked the Minister for Roads and Highways when Kumasi roads would be given a face-lift.
    Minister for Roads and Highways (Mr Kwasi Amoako- Attah) 10:40 a.m.
    Background
    Mr Speaker, Kumasi, a cosmo- politan city and the capital of the Ashanti Region, has seven Munici- palities including the Kumasi Metropolis. It has lucrative tourist attractive centres, museums and cultural facilities attracting a high influx of people within the entire enclave.
    Current Programme
    As part of the Department of Urban Roads (DUR's) objectives to improve the urban road network nationwide, Kumasi is receiving a major facelift through the provision of road infrastructure. This facelift programme is to improve commercial/ socio-economic activities, enhance accessibility, connectivity and livelihood, amongst others.
    As part of the facelift programme, numerous road projects ranging from asphaltic concrete overlays, rehabilita- tion, upgrading, reconstruction and partial reconstruction to bituminous surfacing would be undertaken. Indeed, asphaltic concrete overlays have started. Besides, the SinoHydro Facility Projects (Phase I&II), which cover over 100 km of roads within the Metropolis and an Interchange at Suame Roundabout, are at various stages of implementation.
    A funding facility provided by Messers Contracta Construction UK for rehabilitation of over 240 km of roads within the Kumasi Metropolis to bituminous surfacing is receiving Cabinet's attention.
    Mr Speaker, to date, some critical roads including Santasi/Anyinam area roads (20km), dualling of Ahodwo - Sokoban road (3.2km), Trede - Ahodwo road (13.0km), dualing of Dompoase Junction- Aputuogya section (9.0km) of Kumasi - Kuntanase road and some roads within Atasomanso and Buokrom areas are being rehabilitated or constructed.
    Mr Owusu-Amankwah 10:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I want to find out from the Hon Minister for Roads and Highways how soon the funding facility, provided by Messers Contracta Construction UK for rehabilitation would be approved by Cabinet.
    Mr Amoako-Attah 10:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I want to assure the Hon Member that
    Mr Speaker 10:40 a.m.
    Thank you very much, Hon Minister, for attending to the House this morning and answering our Questions. We particularly appreciate your presence as well as your punctuality in filling in our gaps for us with your timeous presence. Thank you very much, and you are respectfully discharged.
    Alhaji (Dr) Abdul-Rashid H. Pelpuo 10:40 a.m.
    Thank you Mr Speaker.
    I just wanted an opportunity to say thank you to the Hon Minister. Yesterday I called him on a similar issue which I could have taken up with him formally, and he answered while in Benin. He told me that because of today's Question time, he would cut off his journey and come.
    Mr Speaker, we have always complained about Hon Ministers who do not want to come to Parliament to answer Questions. Over the period that he has been an Hon Minister, he has been very consistent. I am happy that he has made those assurances that all roads in the country are of
    Mr Speaker 10:40 a.m.
    Hon Minister, you have the full commendation of this Hon House and our appreciation for your good work. Thank you very much.
    Hon Members, we would move to the Business Statement for the week. Hon Majority Leader?
    Mr Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 10:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I believe the Hon Member who spoke last has hit the nail right on the head by recognising the Hon Minister for Roads and Highways as being one of the most Parliament-friendly Ministers.
    I do not believe that it was a subtle application from the Hon Member to the Hon Minister, to be considered for the roads in his constituency. Indeed and in truth, I think the Hon Minister represents one of the most duty-conscious Ministers.
    Mr Speaker, sometime back, a predecessor of yours, Rt Hon Peter Ala Adjetey, instituted an award scheme for such Hon Ministers and even Hon Members of Parliament who are very diligent. Perhaps, we may have to revisit that scheme to see
    whether we could by that motivate some Hon Members of Parliament and Hon Ministers who attend regularly to the Business of Parliament so that they would motivate others to be in the House.
    Mr Speaker 10:50 a.m.
    I would direct that the Hon Majority Leader, the Hon Minority Leader and the Clerk to Parliament should please ensure that we implement what the Hon Majority Leader has just said.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 10:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, we shall act accordingly.
    BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE 10:50 a.m.

    Chairman of the Business Committee/Majority Leader (Mr Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu) 10:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Committee met yesterday, Thursday, 28th March, 2019 and arranged Business of the House for the Tenth Week ending Friday, 5th April 2019.
    Mr Speaker, the Committee accordingly submits its Report as follows 10:50 a.m.
    Arrangement of Business
    Question(s)
    Mr Speaker, the Business Com- mittee has scheduled the following Ministers to respond to Questions asked of them during the week:
    No. of Question(s)
    i. Attorney-General and Minister for Justice 2
    ii. Minister for Energy 3
    iii. Minister for Regional Reorganisation and Development 1
    iv. Minister for Trade and Industry 1
    v. Minister for Local Government and Rural Development 1
    Total Number of Questions 8

    Mr Speaker, five (5) Ministers are expected to attend upon the House to respond to eight (8) Questions during the week. The questions are of the following types:

    i. Urgent -- 2;

    ii. Oral -- 6.

    Statements

    Mr Speaker, pursuant to Order 70(2), Ministers of State may be permitted to make Statements of Government policy. Statements duly admitted by the Mr Speaker may be made in the House by Hon Members, in accordance with Order

    72.

    Bills, Papers and Reports

    Mr Speaker, Bills may be presented to the House for First Reading in accordance with Order 120. However, those of urgent nature

    may be taken through the various stages in one day in accordance with Order 119.

    Pursuant to Order 75, Papers for presentation to the House may be placed on the Order Paper for laying. Committee reports may also be presented to the House for consideration.

    Motions and Resolutions

    Mr Speaker, Motions may be debated and their consequential Resolutions, if any, taken during the week.

    Sitting On Monday/Extended Sittings

    Mr Speaker, in view of the tall order of Business pending for parliamentary consideration, the Business Committee recommends that the House Sits on Monday, Ist April, 2019.
    Mr Speaker, the Committee accordingly submits its Report as follows 10:50 a.m.


    The House would also be required to Sit beyond the regular adjournment time of 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Order

    40(3).

    Adjournment Sine Die

    Mr Speaker, as all Hon Members may recall, the House has been informed that there are various international obligations requiring the attendance by the Speakership and the Leadership of the House. In that regard, earlier indications had been given to the effect that the House could adjourn sine die on Friday, 5th April

    2019.

    However, there still remain very important Businesses for the House to transact. This may cause the House to revert to the original schedule of adjourning on Friday, 12th April, 2019. The Business Committee therefore entreats all Committees to expedite work on their referrals and submit same for consideration in Plenary to enable the completion of work early in order to cause an early adjournment.

    Conclusion

    Mr Speaker, in accordance with Standing Order 160(2) and subject to Standing Order 53, the Committee submits to this Honourable House the order in which the Business of the House shall be taken during the week under consideration.
    Mr Speaker, the Committee accordingly submits its Report as follows 10:50 a.m.
    Statements
    Presentation of Papers --
    (a) Annual Statement by the Audit Committee of the Ghana Institute of Manage- ment and Public Admini- stration (GIMPA) for the year
    2017.
    (b) Report of the Finance Committee on the Loan Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana (represented by the Ministry of Finance) and Kreditanstalt Fur Wiederauf- bau (KFW), Frankfurt am Main, of Germany for an amount of nineteen million, six hundred and ninety thousand euros (€19,690,000) to finance the Outgrower and Value Chain Fund (OVCF)- Phase III.
    (c) Report of the Finance Committee on the Request for waiver of Import Duties, Import VAT, GETFund Levy, Import NHIL, EXIM Levy, Special Import Levy amounting to the Ghana Cedi equivalent of twenty-four million, nine hundred and thirty-four thousand, nine hundred and eighty-two United States dollars (USS24.934.982.00) on project materials and equip- ment to be procured for the
    Rehabilitation and Up- Grading of Equipment in Technical Universities, Polytechnics and Technical and Vocational Training Centres under the Government Concessional Loan Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the Export-Import Bank of China.
    Consideration Stage of Bills
    Ghana Iron and Steel Development Corporation Bill,
    2019.
    Companies Bill, 2018.
    Committee Sittings.

    Urgent Question
    Mr Rockson-Nelson E. K. Dafeamekpor (South Davi) 10:50 a.m.
    To ask the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice why the General Legal Council has not issued and/or renewed licences of lawyers who were formerly Circuit Court Judges and Magistrates.
    Questions
    Q.483. Mr Rockson-Nelson E. K. Dafeamekpor (South Dayi): To ask the Attorney- General and Minister for Justice the steps the Chief Justice has taken to appoint Judges to the High Courts in Hohoe and Ho.
    Statements
    Presentation of Papers --
    (a) Report of the Committee on Defence and Interior on the Commercial Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana (represented by the Ministry of Defence) and Poly Changda Overseas Engi- neering Company Limited and Poly Technologies. Inc. of the People's Republic of China for an aggregate amount of one hundred million United States dollars (US$100,000,000.00) for the execution and completion of the Military Housing Project for the Ministry of Defence.
    (b) Report of the Committee on Education on the University of Business and Integrated Development Studies Bill,
    2018.
    Motions --
    Second Reading of Bills --
    State Interests and Governance Authority Bill, 2019.
    University of Business and Integrated Development Studies Bill, 2018.
    Consideration Stage of Bills --
    Mr Rockson-Nelson E. K. Dafeamekpor (South Davi) 10:50 a.m.
    Ghana Iron and Steel Develop- ment Corporation Bill, 2019. (Continuation)
    Companies Bill, 2018. (Con- tinuation)
    Committee Sittings

    Questions --

    Q.550. Mr Geoffrey Kini (Nkwanta South): To ask the Minister for Energy when the Ministry will extend electricity to the following communities: (i) Pofripoh (ii) Allege Akura (iii) Kortorkror (iv) Njaare (v) Alokpatsa (vi) B-Zongo (vii) Chartie (viii) Kojoheneba (ix) Kofi Akura (x) Dain Akura (xi) Kankye Akura (xii) Bakamba (xiii) Laboanu (xiv) Fankyenekor (xv) Dufrumkpa Old Town (xvi) Panku Akura (xvii) Krachi Akura.

    Q.551. Mr Edward K. Dery (Lambussie): To ask the Minister for Energy when the following communities will be connected to the National grid: (i) Hamile/Muoteng (ii) Chetu (iii) Kuutawie (iv) Kokoligu (v) Koro (vi) Piina No. 1 (vii) Kpare Baazu (viii) Kami Danpuo (ix) Chebogo (x) Bognuo (xi) Gyerigan (xii) Nyubule (xiii) Tapuma (xiv) Konsi Dahile (xv) Bu.

    Q.573. Mr Kobina T. Hammond (Adansi Asokwa): To ask the Minister for Energy how many oil blocks were awarded between January 2009 and December 2016, and how many of them have achieved their initial exploration require- ments or discovered any oil, and if not, what steps is the Ministry taking to abrogate those agreements.

    Statements

    Presentation of Papers

    (a) Report of the Finance Committee on the Request for waiver of Import Duties, Import VAT, GETFund Levy, Import NHIL, EXIM Levy, Special Import Levy amounting to the Ghana cedi equivalent of four million, seven hundred and four thousand. eight hundred and forty-nine Euros (€4,704,849.00) on project materials and equipment to be procured for the implementation of the “Improving Access to Quality Health Care in the Western Region Project” under the Mixed Credit Facility Agreement between the Government of the Repu- blic of Ghana and the INC Bank of the Netherlands.

    (b) Report of the Committee on Roads and Transport on the National Road Safety Authority Bill, 2019.

    Motions

    (a)Third Reading of Bills --

    Ghana Iron and Steel Development Corporation Bill,

    2019.

    (b) Adoption of the Report of the Finance Committee on the Loan Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana (represented by the Ministry of Finance) and Kreditanstalt Fur Wiederauf- bau (KFW), Frankfurt am Main, of Germany for an amount of nineteen million, six hundred and ninety thousand Euros (€19,690,000) to finance the Outgrower and Value Chain Fund (OVCF) - - Phase III.

    Consequential Resolution

    (c)Adoption of the Report of the Finance Committee on the Request for waiver of Import Duties, Import VAT, GETFund Levy, Import NHIL, EXIM Levy, Special Import Levy amounting to the Ghana cedi equivalent of twenty-four million, nine hundred and thirty-four thousand, nine hundred and eighty-two United States dollars (US$24,934,982.00) on project materials and equipment to be procured for the Rehabilitation and Up- Grading of Equipment in

    technical universities, poly- technics and Technical and vocational training centres under the Government Concessional Loan Agree- ment between the Govern- ment of the Republic of Ghana and the Export-Import Bank of China.

    Consequential Resolution

    Consideration Stage of Bills --

    Companies Bill, 2018. (Conti- nuation)

    University of Business and Integrated Development Studies Bill, 2018.

    Committee Sittings.

    Urgent Question --
    Dr (Mrs) Bernice A. Heloo (Hohoe) 10:50 a.m.
    To ask the Minister for Regional Reorganisation and Development where Santrokofi, Akpafu, Lolobi, and Likpe Traditional Areas fall under Ghana's administrative subdivisions.
    Questions --
    Q.568. Dr Samuel Atta-Mills (Komenda/Edina/Eguafo/ Abrem): To ask the Minister for Trade and Industry why the Komenda Sugar Factory has been shut down and what the reasons are for shutting down the factory.
    Dr (Mrs) Bernice A. Heloo (Hohoe) 10:50 a.m.


    Q.569. Mr Dominic Napare (Sene East): To ask the Minister for Local Government and Rural Development when regulations will be made to give effect to the provision of notices in compliance with the Local Governance Act, 2016 (Act 936), to liberate District Assemblies from high cost of gazetting bye-laws and Ice fixing resolutions.

    Statements

    Motion --

    Adoption of the Report of the Committee on Defence and Interior on the Commercial Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana (represented by the Ministry of Defence) and Poly Changda Overseas Engineering Company Limited and Poly Technologies, Inc. of the People's Republic of China for an aggregate amount of one hundred million United States dollars (US$100,000,000.00) for the execution and comple- tion of the Military Housing Project for the Ministry of Defence.

    Consequential Resolution

    Consideration Stage of Bills --

    Companies Bill, 2018. (Conti- nuation)
    Dr (Mrs) Bernice A. Heloo (Hohoe) 10:50 a.m.
    Committee Sittings.

    Statements

    Motions --

    (a) Second Reading of Bills

    National Road Safety Authority Bill, 2019.

    (b) Adoption of the Report of the Finance Committee on the Request for waiver of Import Duties, Import VAT, GETFund Levy, Import NHIL, LXIM Levy, Special Import Levy amounting to the Ghana cedi equivalent of four million, seven hundred and four thousand, eight hundred and forty-nine euros (€4,704,849.00) on project materials and equipment to be procured for the implemen- tation of the “Improving Access to Quality Health Care in the Western Region Project” under the Mixed Credit Facility Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and the ING Bank of the Netherlands.

    Consequential Resolution

    Consideration Stage of Bills --

    Companies Bill, 2018. (Con- tinuation)

    University of Business and Integrated Development Studies Bill, 2018.

    (Continuation)

    Committee sittings.
    Mr Speaker 10:50 a.m.
    Thank you very much, Hon Majority Leader.
    Ms Betty N.E. K. Mensah 10:50 a.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Speaker, I have sat comfor- tably in my seat and taken my time to go through the Business Statements for the past three weeks, but unfortunately, an Urgent Question I filed which has to do with the shortage of anti-snake venom in the country and exactly in my district, for the Hon Minister for Health to come and respond to such an urgent situation has still not been programmed.
    Mr Speaker, I would like to find out from the Hon Chairman of the Business Committee when such an Urgent Question would be programmed for the Hon Minister to come and respond to.
    Mr Emmanuel A. Buah 10:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thank you for the opportunity.
    Mr Samuel O. Ablakwa 10:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am most grateful for the opportunity and also wish to thank the Hon Chairman of the Business Committee for the presentation.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Majority Leader has kept this House in
    Mr Samuel O. Ablakwa 11 a.m.
    abeyance on the matter to do with the adjourning of this particular Meeting. Every week, when the Business Statement is presented, we are told the House would adjourn sine die on either the 5th or the 12th of April. It was the same for last week, but indications are that if we work out, the House could adjourn sine die on the 5th April. The ensuing week is 5th April and we still do not have a clear indication.

    Mr Speaker, the Hon Majority Leader himself, on item numbered 4, said that the Speakership and Leadership have international obligations which have to be met. There is no indication that Speakership and Leadership have decided to abandon their interest or to no longer pursue this international obligations, so why can we not work with the 5th April, 2019 date? I think that the Hon Majority Leader would have to be clear with us. It allows all of us to plan and we can begin to prepare ourselves for the task ahead.

    So the Hon Majority Leader should please clarify, and this lack of certainty would have to be resolved today. Let us resolve this matter once and for all. If it is the 5th April, the Hon Majority Leader should be bold to tell us that it is the 5th or the 12th. It does appear that the Hon Majority Leader prefers the 12th April, 2019, and if that is the case, he should tell us so we can all plan accordingly. It is very important.

    Mr Speaker, the second issue, which I have been raising consistently, has to do with the reports that are in arrears; the Annual Reports of the Universities and the Annual Report of the Presidential Office Act, under Section 11. Today appears to be the last window that the Executive has to submit that report, according to Section 11 of Act 463.

    The next Sitting day is the 1st April, 2019 and the law is very clear; it is unambiguous that the report must come to Parliament within three months, and that ends today. Today is the last Sitting day of Parliament for the first three months. And we all know our President is a lawyer who strives to be law abiding, so I do not want to believe that there is an attempt to breach the Presidential Office Act, (Act 463).

    Mr Speaker, finally, I also have an Urgent Question, and Standing Order 64(1) and (2) is very clear; this question has been in purgatory for probably four weeks now, and it is an urgent matter. I thought that it would have featured in the Business Statement for this week.
    Mr Speaker, Standing Order 64(2) says, and I beg to quote 11 a.m.
    “Notice of intention to ask a Question shall be given by delivery of the Question in writing at the Office of the Clerk (Table Office) on a day not later than 10 Sitting days (exclusive of any Saturday and Sunday or Public Holiday) before the day
    on which the Sitting commences at which it is proposed to ask the Question.”
    Mr Speaker, it has been more than three weeks and the Question is still in the queue. I would just want to appeal to the Hon Majority Leader that we should try and pay attention to Urgent Questions and our Standing Orders so that we do not lose the essence of the provision to do with Urgent Questions.
    Mr Rockson-Nelson E. K. Dafeamekpor 11 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I have two issues; the first is that, I am happy that my two Questions that appeared to be lingering for a long time now have featured again.
    Mr Speaker, I am most worried about the fact that we ask Questions seeking answers for certain purposes; first, for accountability and, I have engaged the Hon Attorney-General severally on this matter, and she has been very candid with me, that she has written severally to the Judicial Secretary and he or she is failing to respond to the Questions to enable the Hon Attorney-General and Minister for Justice to come to this House to answer us.
    I find it very worrying that we would direct Questions and the Hon Ministers responsible would also direct to the appropriate institutions and they fail to respond to the Hon Ministers' request to enable them to attend upon this House to respond to the Questions we file. We need to do something about it.
    Mr Speaker, the second issue is about the nature of media reportage on our activities in this House. Indeed, last week, I was shocked to read that only 15 Members of Parliament attended Parliament. And the issue was supposed to have been raised by the Rt Hon Speaker. But on that very day, about five Committees of Membership of not less than 25 Hon Members were meeting. And it is important that we do -- the media reportage in this House is reflective of what we do —
    Mr Speaker 11 a.m.
    Hon Member, you are out of order. This Honourable House came to a clear consensus, and in fact, it is also upheld by our rules that plenary overrides everything. And we must attend Plenary before we proceed to other matters, therefore, plenary is plenary. And I thought we were very clear on that, and so we would not go back on that. Do you have any other matter?
    Mr Richard M. K. Quashigah 11 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you —
    Mr Speaker 11 a.m.
    No, not you. My direction is towards —
    Mr Samuel N. George 11 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you for protecting me from the bullying of my senior Hon Colleague. I just want to draw the attention of the House to some of the consequential orders you have given —
    Mr Speaker 11 a.m.
    Hon Member, you were not bullied in anyway at all — [Laughter] — The Hon Member thought it was he who had been
    Mr Speaker 11 a.m.


    recognised, so let us keep things cool. — [Laughter] — Please continue.
    Mr George 11 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, in a very cool manner — [Laughter] — I just want to draw, especially, the attention of Hon Ministers of State and Heads of Agencies who are supposed to act on consequential orders of Mr Speaker. I say this because I remember that in the second quarter of 2017, I made a Statement on the floor of the House about the gruesome murder of a senior constituent of mine, a family head, allegedly by four police officers from the Tema Metropolis.
    Mr Speaker gave a directive, giving a timeline to the Ministry of the Interior to investigate that matter and report same to this august House but that has not been done. Subsequent to that, in the last quarter of last year, the Mankralo of Prampram was murdered. Again, pending any clear- cut direction.
    I would want to urge that this House exercises stringently its oversight responsibilities and carries out the directives of Mr Speaker, especially, when referrals of that nature are given by this House so that the Business Committee can put pressure on the Ministers of State to address these matters, especially when there are timelines to them.
    Mr Richard M. K. Quashigah 11:10 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, my concern is on paragraph 4, which has been touched
    on by other Hon Members who earlier spoke to it, and it is on the adjournment of the House.
    Mr Speaker, the first part of paragraph 4, obviously, the Hon Majority Leader was not very certain, but he indicated to us that some international assignments were the reason for which we intended to adjourn on the 5th April, 2019. My concern is, has anything changed? When we go to the second leg of that paragraph, he makes a stronger statement of the House reverting to the original timeline for adjournment sine die the 12th April, 2019, because of very important Businesses.

    I would want to find out from him whether there has been a change in the dates for these international assignments or not, the reason for which he makes a very strong statement of paragraph 2 of page 4? If not, is it not possible that even during our vacation, we could be recalled to look at these very important Businesses based on how urgent they may be at the time?

    Thank you, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Ras Mubarak 11:10 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am very grateful.
    Mr Speaker, on the consequential orders that you have given, there was also an issue that I raised about the abuse of children which you directed that the Hon Minister responsible for the Interior appeared before the
    House in three days. It has been three weeks now and I am hoping that there would be a closure on that particular consequential order you gave.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Majority Leader makes reference to urgent Business that might have to be completed before we rise. I would like to find out from him exactly what the programme is, so that we would adequately prepare. As we speak, there seems to be a cloud of fog hovering a date when we would be adjourning sine die. It is important that we get to prepare adequately.
    Mr Speaker, finally, will the Hon Majority Leader indicate whether there was an agreement at the Business Committee meeting over this particular programme or not. I ask because from the look of things, this is a programme of the Business Committee but gauging the sense of the House, a majority of us would be happier to rise on the 5th of April, 2019. I do not know whether there was consensus in coming to the agreement that we might have to drag on until the 12th of April, 2019. These are the concerns that I would hope the Hon Majority Leader would address.
    Mr Speaker, I thank you.
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim 11:10 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thank you for giving me the opportunity.
    Mr Speaker, listening to Hon Colleagues on the issue of adjourning sine die, at the Business Committee meeting yesterday, the Committee saw this issue as a very serious one that could generate the kind of comments and debate we are seeing today.
    Mr Speaker, truly speaking, at the Business Committee meeting yes- terday,a majority of the Members including the Hon Minority Leader, the Deputy Minority Leader, myself and other Hon Colleagues were calling for the adjournment sine die of the House on the 5th April, 2019. It is not the case of the travelling of Speakership and Leadership that is why the House is being called upon to reduce the original date of adjournment by one week. Which document is there to show that the House was supposed to adjourn sine die on the 12th April,
    2019?
    Mr Speaker, the original date for the adjournment of the House was the 29th of this month which is today. Then the Business Committee adopted that one and that was what was agreed upon. So, clearly speaking, we have added another week from the original 29th March, 2019 to the 5th April,
    2019.
    Mr Speaker, if you look at today's Order Paper, even though the Business Committee said we should have an extended Sitting today, what is on the Order Paper that the House would even be sitting on today? There is no serious Business that could even warrant an extended Sitting today
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim 11:10 a.m.


    checking from today's Order Paper. Why should he be calling for an additional week?

    Mr Speaker, even the argument that the original date was on the 12th April, 2019 and that it is because the Rt. Hon Speaker is travelling is flawed. Mr Speaker, before the 29th March, 2019 was accepted, we knew that Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) meeting would be from the 5th to the 11th April, 2019. And we knew that the Rt. Hon Speaker could be travelling, yet the Business Committee adopted the 29th March, 2019 as the day for the House to adjourn sine die.

    Mr Speaker, so clearly speaking, if you judge from the sense of the House and especially Hon Members, including the technical staff, the press corps, et cetera, you would realise that everybody has been over- stretched to the maximum elastic point.

    Mr Speaker, we have been having extended Sittings for the past two to three weeks; even next week, we are going to have an extended Sitting. People write reports; people broadcast Parliament from 10 o'clock in the morning to sometimes 6 or 7 o'clock in the evening. So, when we are making indications like this, we must consider the physical capacity, mental capacity and other indications of the organisations that we are leading.

    Mr Speaker, so I beg to say that yesterday, we were even pushing for

    the Question to be put. It is not that the Business Committee was suffering from indecision. We wanted to be definite on this matter and the majority of us were pushing for the vote to be cast, so that it would be definite that the House or the Business Committee was of the pleasure that we adjourn on the 5th April, 2019.

    The Hon Chairman of the Business Committee said that we cannot decide on this and he is now bringing this to the attention of the House as though the Business Committee was suffering from indecision. We were definite. We are calling for the House to be adjourned sine die on the 5th April, 2019. What Business is there to warrant that we add one more week? If there are legislations, constitutional instruments or legislative instruments that would need more days to be able to accommodate, fine, because we do all those things sometimes.

    So, when there is no Business, do not let us abuse the extended Sitting and other things for people to go and say that because the Rt. Hon Speaker is travelling, he would want the House to adjourn sine die on the 5th April, 2019. That is not the case.
    Mr Speaker 11:10 a.m.
    Hon Majority Leader?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 11:10 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, since many people have raised issues about the content of paragraph 4 of the Memorandum
    accompanying the Business State- ment, I think it is important that I start from there, not least because of the spirited effort of the Hon Deputy Minority Whip to give an indication that the Business Committee resolved more or less that we should adjourn on the 5th April, 2019.
    Mr Speaker, I just want to indicate to the Hon Deputy Minority Whip that adjournment sine die of this House does not lie in the mouth of the Business Committee -- it does not. So, whatever decision we take there is of no moment, regardless of the spiritedness of his advocacy. Whatever he says is of no moment.
    Mr Speaker, let me refer the Hon Deputy Minority Whip to Order 37 (3) which reads 11:20 a.m.
    “During any one Session Parliament may adjourn for such periods as may be determined by Mr Speaker.”
    The Order 37 (3) did not say that the Business Committee should do so.
    Mr Speaker, so for the Hon Deputy Whip to rise and engage in this advocacy as if he is possessed by whatever spirit -- [Laughter] -- he should apply himself to the Standing Orders and that should settle it.
    Mr Speaker, there are other issues raised by other Hon Colleagues; the Urgent Question.

    My aspiring deputy presidential candidate asked a Question on anti- snake medicine and she says to us that it has not been programmed. Mr Speaker, again, the pendency of an Urgent question has nothing to do with the Business Committee. It is Mr Speaker who admits Questions; either normal Questions or Urgent Questions and when he has so admitted them, the Business Committee is then alerted.

    If your Question has not been programmed -- Mr Speaker, we have said this time and again that Hon Members should resort to the usual process of tracing and tracking where their Question is instead of offloading their burden on the Business Com- mittee. Regardless of the status of the aspirant, I believe that, unfortunately the Business Committee cannot help. Mr Speaker, so she could resort to the usual channels to trace and track where her Question is.

    Mr Speaker, Hon Armah Buah suggested to us that we should determine what is achievable and what is not achievable. I related to my Hon Colleagues at the Business Committee on the anticipations of some two very important Bills that may come next week. Mr Speaker, one depends on the collaboration amongst the political parties, that is, in respect of political vigilantism.

    I know the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice is working on it so if it should come, we may be required to on it and bring the matter to a closure. It is one of the issues
    Mr Speaker, let me refer the Hon Deputy Minority Whip to Order 37 (3) which reads 11:20 a.m.


    that may require us to adjourn on 12th April, 2019. Mr Speaker, I think another matter relates to duties and exemptions. People have been complaining, especially those who are importers. Again, I know that a Bill is being fashioned out. These are two very important Bills that may cause us to revert to the original adjournment date of 12th April. Mr Speaker, I know that it may become difficult for us to begin or complete the Companies Bill, 2018, yet we may have to start it to see where we would get to. [Interruption.] Mr Speaker, he is asking why. It is because it is one of the issues that any Parliament in the world is required to attend to.

    Mr Speaker, we should remember that in 2016 during the era of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) Government, it came to Parliament for us to deal with it and at that time the principal consideration was the transparency that it should engender, particularly, the beneficial interest owners matter. Mr Speaker, when we realised that it was going to be difficult for us to deal with the entirety of the Bill, I suggested strongly to the then Attorney-General and Minister for Justice and the Speaker at the time that we should string them out and apply ourselves to those matters.

    That was what we did to enable us to complete them in due time but now we have to go back to the entirety of the document. Mr Speaker, for that reason, we intend to migrate outside Accra this weekend to consider it. I do not know where we would get to,

    but we should start in earnest and depending on what happens, we would complete it if it is possible. Mr Speaker, but if it is not possible, we would know what to do at the appropriate and fullness of time. Mr Speaker, this is in response to Hon Armah-Buah.

    The issue that he raised about the girls who have been kidnapped and asking Parliament to express concern -- I could not really -- [Interruption] -- Did you ask an Urgent Question? Mr Speaker, it is the same response.

    Mr Speaker, the first issue raised by Hon Ablakwa relates to the response I have given which relates to the adjournment on 12th April or earlier. Mr Speaker, on the Annual Report of the Presidential staff, the Hon Member is right and we should conform. We have seen instances when these reports have come six months after the expiry of the time and three months after the expiry of the time.

    It does not mean that we should compare and contrast but we should improve our governance architecture. I think that, for this reason, we need to urge so that if it is not in by close of today, certainly into the early days of next week, it should come to this House.

    Mr Speaker, he relates to some Urgent Questions and I saw that he was labouring to relate to the appropriate Standing Order. Mr Speaker, he quoted Standing Order 64(2) but he should find solace in Standing Order 60(3) and not 64 (2),

    that one is more explicit but it depends on when a Question is transmitted to the Hon Minister and I think that for purposes of accountability and transparency, we should begin to show exactly when Questions are transmitted to Hon Ministers so that Hon Members are not be kept in abeyance. Mr Speaker, so, Hon Ablakwa should apply himself to Standing Order 60 (3) because that is where his salvation lies and certainly not in Standing Order 64 (2) because that does not really relate to what he says the Hon Minister should do.

    Mr Speaker, Hon Rockson- Nelson Dafeamekpor said that he has written to the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice on some issues on countless occasions. Again -- [Interruption] -- Mr Speaker, I would liaise with the Attorney- General and Minister for Justice and the Hon Member would be with the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice this evening so I guess we could have a conversation around that.

    Mr Speaker, on the media report, I guess the Speaker called you to order and I think it is important --
    Mr Speaker 11:20 a.m.
    That issue has been overruled so proceed on other matters.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 11:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Minority Leader has called on me to deal with matters on adjournment and I have responded to them. He was not here and I would not allow him to bring us back because
    I have dealt with it decisively. I do not intend to go back again.
    Mr Speaker, when the Business Committee submits a Report and questions are to be asked, they should relate to the Business Statement. Mr Speaker, but Hon Members often ask questions that have nothing to do with the Business Statement before the House. I believe that, hence, we should devise a scheme not to respond to questions that are outside the Business Statement because Hon Members should be aware that our Standing Orders prohibit such exercise -- that is going outside what is before us.
    Mr Speaker, Hon George related to some directives to the Hon Minister for the Interior and Hon Ras Mubarak also related to another directive to the same Hon Minister. I guess that we should remind the Hon Minister. If the directive from here has been transmitted to him, then we should remind the Hon Minister to come and respond to those matters certainly before we adjourn the House.
    Mr Speaker, I do not know whether transmittals have been made. If these matters have been transmitted to him, I am not in a position to tell. Mr Speaker, it is the reason why I urge the officers at the Table Office that whenever these things are done, they should alert me so that I know.

    Mr Speaker, unfortunately, we have not come to any final conclusion on that. When they do, I am kept in
    Mr Speaker 11:30 a.m.
    Thank you very much, Hon Majority Leader.
    Indeed, even though, theoretically, the power to determine the time of rising, et cetera is reposed in the Speaker, we all know as a matter of fact that there is always an Hon Minister responsible for Government Business, and we look at the practicalities of Government Business under the leadership of the Majority Leader at any given time, to make a determination for which matter this is essentially the business of the Business Committee led by the Hon Majority Leader.
    So, if the Hon Majority Leader gives us the reasons for which there is the need for us to continue, that should be enough for the House. That is what is essentially being done. I would like that in future this plea should be a matter to be shared clearly with the Business Committee and for that matter, the two Sides of the House to build consensus.
    If certain Bills have to be passed to meet certain time frames, it is the duty of Parliament to work in the interest of the country; that is a quintessential issue. I believe that Hon Members would cooperate when that is made clear to the House as a whole. In fact, this Honourable House has been known to have been called at midnight to fulfil its legal duties.
    However, I would like that Hon Leaders must share programmes ahead and for which Government might want Sitting to be held to fulfil certain requirements of good governance in this country. Save to add, therefore, and in fact, I have conveyed it in the presence of the Hon Majority Leader, that I would like him to convey and re-convey that Hon Members want that if a programme is put before them, for which they are willing and ready to serve the nation, all those responsible to supply us with appropriate documents and lay relevant Papers must also do their bit so that we can do our work expeditiously. I would want to put this on record in the interest of Business efficacy in this Honourable House.
    Matters of Questions are very important. I would want to reiterate that which I said some time ago on a Question appropriately raised by Hon Okudzeto Ablakwa that the Hon First Deputy Speaker and I, at least, are very expeditious in admitting Ques- tions, unless a Question blatantly offends our rules, and I hardly find any actually. It is not common to have Questions that are frivolous or already asked, the answers of which are within the ordinary purview of the society and so on, as stipulated in our laws.
    So, we are very quick about it. I would advise that, in future, the next thing which is also provided for is the Table Office and for that matter, the Clerk to Parliament would be in the position to give Hon Members information on the status of your Q Question at any given time. I would advise that Hon Members feel free and in fact, are duty bound to follow up on their Questions at the Table Office to ensure that they are duly listed. Listing is not part of the business of the Rt Hon Speaker as such.
    In that regard, Hon Members, the Business Statement as presented is duly admitted.
    Thank you very much.
    Hon Members, item listed 6, Statements. We have a Statement on the recent damage to a power trans- mission pylon belonging to Ghana Grid Company Limited (GRIDCo) by unknown nation wreckers and the need for urgent preventive measures.
    It is by the Hon Member for Tarkwa- Nsuaem.
    Hon Member for Tarkwa- Nsuaem?
    STATEMENTS 11:40 a.m.

    Mr George Mireku Duker (NPP -- Tarkwa Nsuaem) 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you for the opportunity.
    Mr Speaker, we were dumb- founded to hear the hacking down of one of the high voltage transmission pylons belonging to the Ghana Grid Company (GRIDCo) within the Tema enclave on Monday, 25th March,
    2019.
    The hacked-down pylon fell on an adjacent tower in the process.
    Mr Speaker, this despicable act of vandalism to the transmission pylon which occurred around 1:30am on Monday saw the whole power generation system losing some 180 megawatts of power.
    According to GRIDCo, the damaged tower forms part of the transmissional chain that transmits power from Karpower, VRA and AKSA to the national grid. The unfortunate situation resulted in power interruptions to parts of Greater Accra including Dansoman, Kasoa, Swan
    Mr George Mireku Duker (NPP -- Tarkwa Nsuaem) 11:40 a.m.


    Lake and parts of Western and Ashanti Regions, respectively.

    Mr Speaker, the intention to cause pandemonium in the country is a cause to worry as this type of incident has been happening in other jurisdictions.

    Mr Speaker, on March 8, 2019, the people of Venezuela were shocked to the marrow, when saboteurs waged an “Electrical War” to cut out power supply poles, leaving millions in the dark.

    Mr Speaker, the State-owned electricity operator Corpoelec blamed the outage on “an act of sabotage at the Guri Dam.

    Mr Speaker, on November 22, 2015, the Russian Government announced a state of emergency in the disputed Crimean Peninsula late Saturday evening after power to the region was suddenly cut in an apparent act of sabotage.

    Mr Speaker, there is a notorious power saboteur group named “Dragonfly” based in the United States of America who have been operating under cover to dismantle electricity power installations in the world. They have been in operation since 2011 and have been targeting electricity transmission infrastructures, electricity generation infrastructures, petroleum pipelines, et cetera, and their target operations have so far been Poland, Romania, Greece, Italy, Serbia, France, USA, et cetera.

    Mr Speaker, these examples are enumerated to guide us to be informed of the trending calculated saboteurs who can practically cause mayhem in the power sector to infringe on the economic growth of our country.

    Mr Speaker, Ghana could be a target if local perpetrators form a cartel with some of these groups.

    Mr Speaker, taking what transpired within the Tema enclave, the saboteurs destroyed bolts and nuts of the pylon at its base while a substance believed to be corrosive allegedly used for the damage was also seen at the scene.

    This unfortunate development must be condemned by all well-meaning Ghanaians irrespective of our party affiliation because it was an attack on the integrity of this nation.

    Mr Speaker, investigators from the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) of the Ghana Police Service who visited the scene found a hacksaw as evidence of what was used by the suspected saboteurs. Obviously, this is a man-made event and a clear sabotage.

    Mr Speaker, I would like to urge the security agencies to intensify their investigation into the matter in order to bring the perpetrators of this criminal action to book.

    The general public, especially, those living in and around Tema, Dawhenya, Afienya, Kpone, Ashaiman and Prampram must help to volunteer information on suspected individuals to the Police to aid investigations.

    Mr Speaker, GRIDCo has estima- ted to spend a total amount of GH¢500,000 (US$100,000) to replace the two pylons that were destroyed as a result of the havoc.

    This money could have obviously been spent on other useful national needs.

    Mr Speaker, this unfortunate incident which is an attack on the nation must be a wakeup call to all of us on the urgent need to intensify the protection of all our national assets.

    In an era of technological advancement, there is an urgent need for the country to invest in technology to protect and safeguard all our strategic national installations that provide essential services for our daily survival.

    Mr Speaker, it must be possible for entities such as GRIDCo, the Volta River Authority (VRA), and the Ghana Water Company Limited (GWCL), Ghana Gas, Power Distribution Services (PDS) and the Bulk Oil Storage, Transportation (BOST) to be able to monitor all their assets no matter their distance from a central location by the use of technology.

    Mr Speaker, this, I believe, will enhance early detection when saboteurs invade our national installations.

    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for the platform. I am grateful.
    Mr Speaker 11:40 a.m.
    Hon Member, thank you very much for this well- researched Statement on a matter of national importance.
    Yes, Hon Minister, you may speak. I looked on my left and right before calling you. The Hon Member who just stood up would be called next. I can start from either Side, so long as I balance it. Please go on.
    Minister for Health (Mr Kwaku Agyeman-Manu) 11:40 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you for the opportunity given me to contribute to the Statement on the Floor.
    Mr Speaker, all of us as Members of Parliament are very concerned about the supply of utilities like water and electricity to communities and constituencies and to the nation.
    Unfortunately, this incident came very close to when we were battling whether dumso was resurrecting or not, and the time when the Hon Minister for Energy came here and explained what some of our Hon Colleagues were thinking that dumsor was coming back, and assured the nation that we would get electricity by a certain date was good.
    That date came and we saw the end of the work that was being done, and therefore, electricity supply stabilised somewhat. Then in less than a week or so, pylons were falling down; investigations pointed to saboteurs trying to pull down pylons to disrupt electricity supply in our country.
    Minister for Health (Mr Kwaku Agyeman-Manu) 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, this matter cannot be just a coincidence. Some of us begin to wonder whether we are being attacked by a terrorist group or a new group like we have in Nigeria who are attacking pipelines to probably cause harm to the management of the economy. It makes me begin to wonder where we are now, consciously sawing down electricity pylons just to disrupt supply so that some of us would go to town to talk about dumsor again.
    Mr Speaker, the nation would have to rise up against such saboteurs, because they are allowed to continue, it may grow to a point where this country would become ungovernable, so that Government cannot continue to rule the nation.
    We all know what electricity does in our country. We all know how we suffered during the dumsor days; how businesses got affected and the impact it had on all of us. I believe that my Hon Colleagues would bear me out. There is nothing as worrisome as having done a whole day's work, then you get home in the evening around 9 o'clock and there is no light in your home. We are no more buying generators like we were doing some time ago.
    We are not stocking fuel to power our generator sets, so if we allow these saboteurs, no matter where they come from and how small they may be, to continue doing what they have done to us in the last two weeks or so, this country would come to a standstill. I would therefore urge my Hon
    Colleagues, including myself, to scale up our advocacy in asking the security agencies to be up and doing, to ensure that these people who hack sawed our pylons would be arrested immediately and brought to book, so that we do not get them building a whole cohort of people who would become economic or energy saboteurs in our country.
    Mr Speaker, as I speak, I had cause to talk to the Hon Minister for National Security. As the Health Minister, I am getting very worried about our water systems at Kpong, Weija and now Teshie, that if we do not monitor and scale up security around those areas, these same saboteurs can turn from electricity and put some chemicals in our water, and then one morning, we would all start running, and then it would be a serious epidemic in this country. Where shall we be?
    Our health systems would then be put to test, and I am afraid we might begin to lose lives before we get ourselves ready.

    So, let us charge the security agencies to sit up and arrest those who caused this problem by making sure that our pylons and our utility systems are surveyed well such that these people cannot get to them any longer for any disruption.

    Thank you, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Suhuyini A. Sayibu (NDC - - Tamale North) 11:50 a.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for the opportunity to associate myself with the Statement that has been ably made by my Hon Colleague.
    Mr Speaker, I agree with you that it is a well-researched presentation, and it is my anticipation that we would be guided in our contributions to ensure that we call for the security agencies to do what they are expected to do: investigating to find the culprits behind whatever may have led to the pylon that fell and caused some darkness in some of our communities.
    Mr Speaker, I would also wish that the electricity providers, that is, Power Distribution Service (PDS) and others would upscale the monitoring and security that they provide for some of these very sensitive installations.
    Mr Speaker, however, I would like to caution that, as politicians, we must be very careful that we do not add another tag to ourselves. Over the years, especially in this country, we have successfully tagged ourselves as corrupt, based on, sometimes, the unfair accusations and allegations that we make against one another. Even though, data, especially, from the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) shows that politicians or people who are engaged in politics are not the most corrupt when it comes to commissions or omissions, we accuse one another.
    Mr Speaker, it is dangerous for us, as politicians in viewing some of these things to begin to create the impression on the minds of our people that we
    have some people who will go to town and celebrate a case of dumsor, and as a result of that, they would engage in this unholy and very unacceptable practice.
    Mr Speaker, over the period, if you are minded to check, you would realise that this is not the first time a pylon has fallen. On 6th September, 2016, some pylons fell in the Ashanti Region.
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    Hon Member, are you therefore suggesting that sabotage is beyond consideration?
    Mr Sayibu 11:50 a.m.
    No, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    Then please, do not tell us that this is not the first time that a pylon has fallen.
    Mr Sayibu 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is a statement of fact.
    Mr Speaker 11:50 a.m.
    If you are not aware and cannot say conclusively, one way or the other, what the causative factor is, then please, move away from your line of argument.
    Mr Sayibu 11:50 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thank you for your guidance. However, it is a statement of fact that on 6 th September, 2016, some pylons fell in the Ashanti Region which led to a number of communities being denied electricity. Investigations later revealed that it was caused by chainsaw operators, who, in the course of their business -- unacceptable as it was -- created the situation that made the pylons fall. At
    Mr Kobina T. Hammond (NPP -- Adansi Asokwa) noon
    Mr Speaker, thank you very much for the opportunity to contribute to this Statement.
    Mr Speaker, I have read the Statement prepared by the Hon Member. In reading it, I have seen that a lot of reference has been made to some problems of similar nature going on in other countries of Europe, USA, North and South America. I guess we should restrict ourselves to the difficulties we are facing in this country.
    Mr Speaker, it is becoming one too many. We would recall that when the decision was taken during your time at the Ministry of Energy that the Accra-Tema Motorway should be lit up, the Government spent so much money to construct electricity facilities on that road. We ended up with a situation where day-in and day-out, the cables were stolen. It was not just the ones on the poles, but the ones that had been buried in the ground; they were dug-up and cut-out. It got to a point where, eventually, some people were apprehended, and I know that they were taken through the legal process.
    Mr Speaker, we should be asking ourselves what we gain, as a nation, by doing this thing to ourselves. We see all sorts of Questions in our Order Papers asking when the national grid
    would be extended to certain communities. It is done for the benefit of the entire nation, but at the end of the day, some individuals decide to vandalise the system. It is despicable.
    Mr Speaker, I think it is about time that the National Security rose up to the occasion. This is not a matter for GRIDCo or PDS -- ECG is dead now; it is ex-parrot. It is not a matter for PDS alone; it has become a national security issue.
    Mr Speaker, there is now cybercrime and I have been told that embedded in these cyber issues are things of this nature: attacking objects of national significance, and national security status. They attack the whole electricity network and the country collapses.

    Mr Speaker, I am not sure anybody has pointed fingers at any particular political party; I have not heard about that. But if the cap fits, whoever it fits, well, they brought their heads, they would have to wear it.

    Nobody has made that point. So, I am not so sure about why my Hon Colleague, Hon Sayibu, is so anxious that somebody is tagging a political party; nobody has done so.

    Mr Speaker, this is a matter for all of us to pay particular attention to. They cannot vandalise the system like that. It is not only a question of disrupting electricity supply and for that matter, the economy of Ghana, it is also dangerous. Some people would recall that on the occasion that I described, when they decided to vandalise the cables underneath the roads to Tema, some individuals were electrocuted. Why should people put their lives on the line for scrap like that? It is a difficulty.

    National Security should get their acts together. The various electricity companies should pull up their socks and collectively, we should be able to win this war. If it is cyber or whatever, the entire security network of this country should be brought to bear on the issue at stake. We should uproot it. It is already so much.

    Mr Speaker, yesterday, by 5 o'clock in the evening, lights were off in East Legon and all the other places, and as of this morning, it had not been restored. Nothing to do with these people. If they decide to vandalise the system, how are we going to get electricity?
    Mr Speaker noon
    Thank you very much, Hon Member, that you were satisfied that you had said enough.
    Mr Emmanuel A. Buah (NDC -- Ellembele) noon
    Thank you, Mr Speaker, for the opportunity. Let me thank the maker of the Statement as well.
    Mr Speaker, we must be very united in our condemnation of the hacking down of one of the high voltage transmission pylons belonging to GRIDCo.
    Mr Speaker, the energy sector is at the heart of our survival as a country and I have argued that I believe that when it comes to the energy sector, quite frankly, politics must end there. If we are going to industrialise and create jobs, it all depends on whether we have adequate power supply -- electricity.
    Mr Speaker, it must be very clear to everybody in Ghana that the NDC Government that has so much stake in the survival of this country and has spent so much in investment -- [Interruption] -- in ensuring energy stability is so much concerned about the stability in our energy sector.
    Mr Speaker, while I address this issue --
    Mr Speaker noon
    Hon Member, when we start to debate --
    Mr Buah noon
    Mr Speaker, I just want to make it clear --
    Mr Speaker noon
    No, please. If we embark on a debate as to which party has provided more electricity, generation or more distribution, which is the pathway you are now treading, then we are really subjecting the Statement to controversy and you know our rules do not allow that.
    Please, move from that pathway and comment on the Statement on the floor of the House.
    Mr Buah noon
    Thank you, Mr Speaker. I would veer completely from that area.
    Mr Speaker, this is a quote from the maker of the Statement noon
    “Mr Speaker, there is a notorious power saboteur group named as “Dragonfly” based in the United States of America who have been operating under cover to dismantle electricity power installations in the world. They have been in operation since 2011 and have been targeting electricity transmission infrastructures, electricity generation infrastructure, petroleum pipelines, et cetera and their target operations have so far been Poland, Romania, Greece, Italy, Serbia, France, USA, et cetera.”
    Mr Speaker, my first thought was, what do we know?
    I remember that as an Hon Minister for Energy, we had such challenges -- criminals whose intent was simply cutting down these pylons to get the
    bolts to use and sell as scrap to make money.
    Mr Speaker, they were basically criminals and that is why I am very concerned that we must be united in our condemnation and urging the security operatives to basically intensify their investigation and arrest these criminals and bring them to book. This goes to our very survival and we are united in it. However, I do not want us to start using words that we are not sure of. When the Hon Minister for Energy uses the word, “saboteurs” when investigations -- [Interruption.] -- then I am concerned.
    Mr Speaker noon
    Hon Member, every person who deliberately damages a pylon for his own economic advantage is a saboteur. Nobody is suggesting that he is a saboteur of a particular kind but, of course, that person is a saboteur. That person must be sabotaging the economy of Ghana. There is no doubt about that. And the “saboteur” in that context is neutral in terms of usage. So do not worry about that. Proceed.
    Mr Buah noon
    Thank you, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Speaker, the reason this is important is that nobody waits in this. I slept in the dark last night and I am sure a lot of people did. So, I had proposed as an Hon Minister when some of these issues came up that the power and utility companies --
    GRIDCo, VRA, ECG -- must work closely. The letter is on record and there were meetings held to this effect. The letter was for us to have a central security centre to protect this critical national infrastructure so that at one centre -- for example, if there is any attempt by any criminal to damage a pipeline or a GRIDCo installation, it can be alerted and the centre would notify authorities and immediately, people would be arrested.
    Mr Speaker, I think the time has come for us to do that. However, I believe that we must be united in our quest to ensure the security in the protection of these critical investments. They are very important. Let me also caution that we must be very careful in making sure we support the security organisations to arrest these criminals that we do not impute for once that somehow we think this is to anybody's advantage. It is not and it cannot be.
    So while I commend the maker of the Statement, I believe we are sending a clear message to those criminals that when it comes to critical installation, we are very united as a country and we would not hide. We would give up anybody and we are asking Ghanaians to make sure if they have any information on anybody that would damage any of our critical infrastructure, they should alert the police and I believe it is not completely out of order if I say that the security companies would by all means give them handsome rewards. This goes to the heart of our survival.
    Mr Speaker 12:10 p.m.
    Thank you very much. Leadership, any comments?
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim (NDC -- Banda) 12:10 p.m.
    Thank you very much, Mr Speaker, for giving me the opportunity to make few comments on the Statement.
    Mr Speaker, to begin with, I must commend the maker of the Statement for bringing this to the attention of the House and the nation as well.
    Mr Speaker, I think it is timely that he has brought this to our attention. In the past, when these things happened, we referred to them as pirates and other things. Now, he is bringing the attention of the nation to the activities of saboteurs, and I think it is a good act that is being added to the work of the researchers. As a researcher, when one narrows his horizon, he may not get answers to the causes of the research he is undertaking. Therefore, adding the activities of saboteurs to the happenings in the power and utility sector, I believe, is something in the right direction.
    Mr Speaker, I remember in 2015 and 2016 when the West African Gas Pipeline was seriously damaged by the activities of what we referred to at that time as pirates, it took this
    nation almost one year to find a solution to that problem.
    When we talk to the telecommu- nication companies, one realises that one of the greatest dangers to the call blocks and all those things is the activities of cable thieves, road contractors, galamsey. So, it is something in a good direction, that this happened this way and the attention of the nation has been drawn to the activities of saboteurs. Utility provision is, however, a strategic investment, therefore, Hon Members on both Sides of the House must come together to embrace the call for the attention of the National Security in that direction.
    Mr Speaker, gone are the days when we used to think that because nothing happened there, security just referred to the protection from criminal activities. Now that the attention of criminals has been drawn to the water we drink, as said by the Hon Minister for Health, and the energy that we enjoy, as said by the maker of the Statement, as well as other utility services, I believe the Hon Minister for National Security, the Hon Minister for the Interior and the Hon Minister for Defence must up their game.
    Mr Speaker, with the issue of poisoning the whole nation through the water that we drink, one could imagine the harm it would cause to the nation, and nobody could benefit from that. So, we must embrace the protection of our water sources, water bodies and energy sources.
    Mr Speaker, with these few words, I thank you for the opportunity given, and I must thank the maker of the Statement, as well, for bringing this to the attention of the House. Going forward, we must all come together to make sure that we embrace activities that would solve the situation.
    Mr Speaker, yesterday, I slept in darkness; so of what benefit would it be if I do not help to find the perpetrators and culprits of the activities that caused me to sleep in darkness yesterday? So, with these words, I believe it is a call in the right direction, and I thank you for the opportunity given me.
    Mr Speaker 12:10 p.m.
    Thank you very much, Hon Member.
    It is a patriotic statement indeed.
    Majority Leader (Mr Osei K y e i - M e n s a h - B o n s u ) 12:10 p.m.
    M r Speaker, I must beg to commend the maker of the Statement for submitting this Statement to the House to open our eyes to a very dastardly incident which occurred on Monday, 25th March, 2019.
    Mr Speaker, I was very much taken aback when I heard about the attempted vandalisation of the GRIDCo transmission pylons, which are galvanised aluminium towers. As the former Hon Minister, Hon Armah- Buah, alluded to, they are good materials for scrap dealers, so it is possible that the people may be mere
    criminals. Whatever it is, the intent was obsessively to disrupt electricity supply and cause pandemonium in the country, and that is why they are saboteurs.
    Mr Speaker, therefore, when they are described as saboteurs, it is not to imply that it is any action by a group of people from a particular political party. Nobody has said so. Nobody has said that they belong to any particular political party, or that they come with a particular ethnic, religious or political coloration. Nobody has said so, and the maker of the Statement did not say so.
    Mr Speaker, the nation, as a matter of fact, has suffered limited power outages. The Hon Minister respon- sible for Energy had come to this House to assure the nation that by Tuesday, 19th March, 2019, the limited power outages would be a thing of the past.
    Less than a week after the assurance to resolve the momentary challenge had been given, on Monday, 25th March, 2019, we had this. It is not in any way to suggest that such an action was even effected on Monday, 25th March, 2019; but that action was detected on Monday, 25th March, 2019. What it means is that it could have been done earlier than Monday, 25th March, 2019, and the intention was to plunge this nation into darkness.
    Mr Speaker, the reason is that there had been about four occasions earlier when the nation witnessed these breaches. The first, we understand, was in the late 1980s,
    Majority Leader (Mr Osei K y e i - M e n s a h - B o n s u ) 12:20 p.m.
    when a vehicle plunged into a pylon. It caused momentary vibration and power outages. It was purely an accident. The vehicle had run into it, and people died.
    Mr Speaker, the second time the nation witnessed this was occasioned by mere erosion at the base of the pylons, and they tilted. The third time, as the Hon Minister alluded to, perhaps during his time, was also when criminals went and decided to unknot the knots that had been used to tighten the pylons beneath. Clearly, they were about to cause the falling of the pylon in order for them to feast on them.
    Mr Speaker, with the fourth one, they went further, and I believe that was in September 2016. The Hon Member was the Hon Minister at the time. Again, the same method had been used, except that this one was a bit different. It did not have to do with just one pylon. They were about three to four pylons in a stretch, and they had a used corrosive material at the base of all of them. This was clearly about two to three days after the Hon Minister had given the assurance in this House. What should anybody think about this? It is a clear attempt to sabotage the system and destabilise the country, and nobody is talking about the ethnic, religious or political coloration of anybody; but clearly, this was a well-orchestrated plan.
    Mr Speaker, we have never seen an attack on four pylons before. On any occasion, it had been one, but this time, they were four. They had used
    corrosive materials at its base, and tried to unknot it. Quickly thereafter, they applied hack saws. The nation has certainly not witnessed this before. Does it play into a statement made that the nation would be plunged into darkness? Nobody knows.
    Mr Speaker, it could be true, or it could be a mere coincidence. So, let us leave that to the security agencies to investigate. It could be a mere coincidence, but it could also be that it was just done to roll into whatever proclamation or statement that had been made by some people. We are not in a position now to pass judgement, but we should let the security agencies do their job.
    Mr Speaker, I agree with the maker of the Statement when he said that the people in the Kpone and the Tema enclave should assist, if they saw any persons acting very speciously. They should assist the investigative agencies to help us unravel who these people are. We may never know what plans they may have going forward. Now that we have seen what they had done there, perhaps, they may move elsewhere. Their intention, clearly, is to disrupt power supply in this country, and we must be careful.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Minister for Health alluded to his own predica- ment, and that is why we try, as a nation, to protect the catchment area of our dams. Yet, people abuse whatever laws there are to protect these water bodies which serve our common interest. We must know that, as a nation, we are not out of the woods.

    What we could urge the security agencies to do now is to act expeditiously to prevent any such happenings in the future. All of us have a charge and a responsibility as far as these matters are concerned. When we speak, we must know that, perhaps, people might feed into what we say, consciously or unconsciously, to do havoc to this nation.
    Mr Speaker 12:20 p.m.
    Thank you very much.
    The Statement is referred to the Committee on Constitutional, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs for further consideration and report.
    Hon Members, it is important for us to consider economic crimes of different dimensions in this country. Many nations have revised their laws on matters relating to economic crimes, which are matters that affect the economy of their nations, and I think that it is about time we did that.
    If someone steals the fluid that propels a transformer, for example, the fluid might not be that expensive, but they steal them and give them to hairdressers who mix them with other things and apply them. Ask yourself, when you arrest a person like that and charge him with stealing that fluid and mention the worth of the fluid, what is it worth in the eyes of a magistrate? Yet, we forget the transformer that serves and gives employment to a
    whole community in that regard. This is what economic crime is all about.
    It is time we, as a House, also had a Committee to look into these to help with the appropriate legislation. If not, we would continue to make Statement upon Statement, yet we would not have contributed to nation building. So, the concerned Hon Members whom I see nodding heartily, kindly rise and do something, so that offences that underpin our economy and affect us all in many ways would be dealt with in a certain manner. This is very important in law reform as a whole.
    When you steal a ballot box, you have stolen the political will of the people. It is not just a box, and we must have laws that would really bite you no matter your persuasion. This is because if you take it to a magistrate that he stole a box, he might even say he did not intend to permanently deprive anybody of the box, therefore, it does not amount to stealing. That is when we would know what would happen in court. So, we must really tighten our laws.
    We think we have laws; but in many cases, we do not have them and they do not bite so as to be a deterrent and a controller of our economy. We hope to have something good from the Report to work on.
    Thank you very much, Hon Members.
    Hon Members, at the Commence- ment of Public Business. During this
    Mr Speaker 12:20 p.m.


    period, the Hon First Deputy Speaker would take the Chair.
    Mr Joseph Osei-Owusu 12:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, may I plead that I move the Motion on the Formula for the Health Insurance Fund.
    Mr Speaker 12:20 p.m.
    Item numbered 8.
    Hon Member, deal with item numbered 7 first.
    MOTIONS 12:20 p.m.

    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Joseph Osei-Owusu) 12:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that notwithstanding the provisions of Standing Order 80(1) which require that no Motion shall be debated until at least forty-eight hours have elapsed between the date on which notice of the Motion is given and the date on which the Motion is moved, the Motion for the adoption of the Report of the Committee of the Whole on the Proposed Formula for the disburse- ment of the National Health Insurance Fund for the year 2019 may be moved today.
    Mr Kwabena M. Akandoh 12:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to second the Motion.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Resolved accordingly
    Proposed Formula for the Disbursement of the National
    Health Insurance Fund for the Year 2019
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Joseph Osei-Owusu) 12:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this Honourable House adopts the Report of the Committee of the Whole on the Proposed Formula for the Disburse- ment of the National Health Insurance Fund for the year 2019.
    Mr Speaker, in so doing, I would present your Committee's Report.
    .
    Introduction
    On Friday, 22nd March, 2019, the Proposed Formula for the Disburse- ment of the National Health Insurance Fund for 2019 was presented to Parliament. The Formula was referred to the Committee of the Whole for consideration and report in accordance with the Standing Orders of the House and article 103 (3) of the 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana.
    Reference Documents
    The Committee, during its delibera- tions, referred to the following document:
    i. The 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana;
    ii. The Standing Orders of the House;
    iii. The National Health Insu- rance Act 2012 (Act 852) as amended by the National
    Health Insurance (Amend- ment) Act, 2015 (Act 888)
    iv. The Formula for the Disbur- sement of the National Health Insurance Fund for 2018; and
    v. The Report of the Committee of the Whole on the Formula for the Disbursement of the National Health Insurance Fund for the year 2018.
    Acknowledgement
    In attendance at the Committee's deliberations were Hon Kingsley Aboagye-Gyadu, Deputy Minister for Health, Dr Lydia Dsane-Selby, Acting Chief Executive Officer of National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA), Mr Ahmed Imoro, Director of Finance, NHIA. The Committee is grateful to them for their assistance.
    Background
    The Government of Ghana, through the Ghana Poverty Reduction Strategy (GPRS), planned its policy strategies of the essential components of the GPRS. One of the strategies was aimed at delivering accessible and affordable healthcare to all residents in Ghana, especially the poor and vulnerable. In achieving the objective of “universal health care, the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) was established by the enactment of the National Health Insurance Act, 2003 (Act 650) to provide financial risk protection against the cost of quality basic healthcare for all
    residents in Ghana. The NHIS introduced the district-wide mutual health insurance scheme to enable access to basic healthcare services without paying cash at the point of delivery. The National Health Insurance Act, 2003 (Act 650) was later repealed and replaced by the National Health Insurance Act, 2012 (Act 852).
    The enactment of Act 852 brought the National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) into being to secure the implementation of a National Health Insurance Policy. The law, Act 852, also established the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) under section 39, and mandates the Council of NHIA to take charge of the responsibility of the management of the Fund. The National Health Insurance Act, 2012 (Act 852) was also later amended by the enactment of the National Health Insurance Act, 2015 (Act 888) to limit the scope of exemptions in respect of exempt supplies.
    Object of the Fund
    The object of the Fund is to pay for healthcare services of members of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS).
    For the purposes of implementing the object of the Fund, section 40 (2) of Act 852 stipulates that moneys from the Fund shall be expended as follows:
    i. To pay for the health care costs of members of the National Health Insurance Scheme.
    ii. To pay for approved admini- strative expenses in relation to the running of the National Health Insurance Scheme.
    iii. To facilitate the provision of access to healthcare services.
    iv. To undertake investments to promote access to health services as may be deter-mined by the Minister for Health in consultation with the Board of the Authority.
    Sources of the Fund
    The sources of the Fund, as stipulated in section 41 of Act 852 are as follows:
    i. The National Health Insu- rance Levy (NHIL);
    ii. Two and a one half per cent (2.5 per cent) of each person's contribution to the Basic SSNIT Pension Fund;
    iii. Moneys approved for the Fund by Parliament;
    iv. Moneys that accrue to the Fund from investments made by the Authority;
    v. Grants, donations, gifts and any other voluntary contribu- tions made to the Fund;
    vi. Fees charged by the Authority in the performance of its functions;
    vii. Contributions made by members of the Scheme, and
    viii. Moneys accruing from the National Insurance Commis- sion under section 198 of the Insurance Act, 2006 (Act
    724)
    Receipts And Payments For 2018
    In respect of NHIL, the Authority received an amount of GH¢1,473.28 billion from the Ministry of Finance for the year ended 31st December, 2018. Premium amounted to GH¢53.52 million, Processing Fee Income, GH¢49.72 million, invest- ments, GH¢28.82 million and Donor Receipts and Other Income, GH¢14.19 million during the period, bringing total receipts to GH¢1,619.53 billion (amount available on cash basis at the close of 2018).
    Payments made during the period amounted to GH¢1,585.380,000 billion and it included claims payment of GH¢1,047,700,000 billion which translates into 66.1 per cent. Excess receipts over payments therefore stood at GH¢34.15 million (operational surplus on cash basis). Details are in Appendix A attached to the Report.
    Revenue and Expenditure for
    2018
    On accrual basis, the total budget expenditure for the year ending 31st December, 2018, was GH¢1,732.66 billion as against an annual budget of
    GH¢2,375,240,000 billion, resulting in a difference of GH¢642.58 million. Details are in Appendix B attached.
    Comparative Analysis of NHIL/ SSNIT Collections and Receipts
    The Authority's Budget allocation from NHIL/SSNIT for 2018 was GH¢2,233.920,000 billion as contained in the Budget Statement and Economic Policy for the 2018 Financial Year. However, NHIL/ SSNIT collections for the year (including estimated NHIL collections for December 2018 and SSNIT collections from October to December 2018) was GH¢1,579,490,000 billion. Of the total collections, an amount of GH¢506.80 million constituting 32.1 per cent had been received by the Authority as at 31st December, 2018.
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Joseph Osei-Owusu) 12:20 p.m.
    SPACE FOR TABLE 3 -- PAGE 11, 12.20 PM
    Information and Communication Technology
    Regarding Information and Communication Technology (ICT), it would be recalled that NHIA officially launched the NHIS Mobile Member- ship Renewal and Authentication Project in December 2018, to enable clients renew their membership from anywhere in the country, using any mobile phone with a SIM registered to any mobile money service. The implementation of the Project is underway and clients who wish to do so under the system can send a text
    message to the short code *929#. Clients can even do the mobile renewal on behalf of others by sending a text message to the same short code *929#. The Project seeks to reduce the waiting time for clients, reduce clients' transportation costs, reduce income losses as members of the Scheme can spend the time saved doing business or working.
    Clients are also expected to receive text messages periodically to remind or alert them of the expiration of their membership so they will not be taken unaware. The Committee also

    observed that service providers are among the beneficiaries of the Mobile Renewal System as it makes available to them reliable digital verification of expiry dates, allows for the use of simple inexpensive devices with low maintenance costs, brings about improved claims management and also allows for easy collection of attendance records because they are digitised.

    The Authority also expects to benefit from the Project since it seeks to reduce its operational costs, increase membership under the Scheme, reduce revenue leakages and enhance the processing of claims. The Committee commends NHIA for the effort and urges it to continue devising more innovative and technological means of improving service delivery in the execution of their mandate.

    The Committee also entreats the National Communications Authority and for that matter, the National Information Technology Agency (NITA), telecommunication com- panies and service providers of the Scheme to cooperate effectively with NHIA to reduce drastically or eliminate fraudsters in the system entirely to ensure successful implementation of the Project.

    The Committee further noted that, in 2019, NHIA projected an amount

    of GH¢81.38 million to be spent on ICT system compared with the 2018 estimate of GH¢52.09 million, an increase of GH¢29.29 million which translates into a percentage increment of 56.23 per cent. The Committee was worried about the increment and raised serious concerns on it. The Officials of NHIA, however, explained that the estimate was higher because the Authority needed an ICT infrastructure including Oracle (one of the softwares used for data management), that would enable it to manage the data it collects.

    The ICT infrastructure is also expected to facilitate the Authority's database integration process with the National Identification Authority. The Officials further explained that though the system appeared expensive, the one being procured by NHIA was one of the cheapest in the country, compared with the banks and some other business entities.

    The Committee was also informed that the Authority had one of the biggest database in the country and in sub-Saharan Africa and therefore needed such a sophisticated and modern software. It was disclosed to the Committee that the Authority has a total of 19.7 million biometrics, processes a total of about 30 million claims a year and has 120,000 clients who access health care in the country daily.

    The Committee was further informed that all installations relating to the ICT infrastructure was soon to be completed so that the expenditure on ICT would decline in the years to come since it will be left with only the aspect of maintenance.

    Minister of Finance to Report on Releases to NHIA

    The National Health Insurance Law imposes an obligation on the Minister responsible for Finance to report to Parliament on funds released to the National Health Insurance Authority in respect of levies, every six months. The Committee recommends that the provision be evoked to enable the House to have knowledge of the financial situation of the Authority periodically, to help ensure the sustainability of the Scheme.

    Financing Policy for NHIS

    The Committee is aware that Government intends developing a policy on NHIS financing to ensure the sustainability of the Scheme. The Committee expressed dissatisfaction about the delay in introducing the policy and urges the Government to expedite action in that regard. The Committee is of the opinion that a national forum would be necessary in finding the way forward to the issue

    of financing and the development of the policy.

    Payments made to Nursing Trainees as Allowances

    Included in the release of funds amounting GH¢358.85 million to the Ministry of Health was an amount of GH¢163.66 million paid to nursing trainees as allowances. The Com- mittee was displeased about the payment and requested the NHIA never to use funds from the NHIF for such purposes.

    NHIA Regional and District Offices

    With the creating of the six new Regions (Western North, Ahafo, Bono East, Oti, Savanna, North East Regions), NHIA needs to have six more regional offices in addition to those already in existence, as part of its efforts aimed at providing a decentralised service to receive and resolve complaints by clients. The Authority has therefore made a provision of GH¢12 million for the establishment of six regional offices to enhance its operations and an amount of GH¢25 million for the establish- ment of 20 new district offices to enhance access to NHIA services.

    Active Membership Coverage

    The Committee noted that the active membership coverage of the Scheme as at the end of 2018 was 10.4 million (34.7 per cent of the estimated population of 30 million)
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Joseph Osei-Owusu) 12:20 p.m.


    and the Authority estimates to cover 12.4 million (41.3 per cent of the estimated population) in 2019.

    Prosecution of Fraudsters

    As already mentioned, NHIA is gradually intensifying its ICT systems to help eliminate fraud in the Scheme to reduce revenue leakages to the barest minimum and possibly eliminate it entirely. Other efforts being made by the Authority to help save the situation is collaborating with the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice to help train staff of its Legal Department to help with the prosecution of some of the cases involving alleged fraudsters. This will expedite action and also serve as a deterrent.

    Research

    It would be recalled that in 2018, no provision was made for research for purposes best known to the officials of the National Health Insurance Authority. In 2019, however, the Committee noted that an amount of GH¢0.15 million (GH¢150,000.00) is estimated to be spent on research. The Committee entreats NHIA to always make provision for research and carry it out periodically, as the findings would be very helpful for references and other purposes including enabling the Authority to draw useful lessons for redress and improvement.

    Investments

    The issue of whether NHIA invested in Menzgold came up and the Committee was informed that the Authority's investments were only in fixed deposits with financial institutions excluding that of Menzgold. The Officials of NHIA explained to the Committee that they had never invested any funds belonging to the Authority in Menzgold.

    Conclusion

    The sustainability of the National Health Insurance Scheme which borders funding is very critical to Ghana's achievement of Universal Health Coverage.

    Unfortunately, NHIA continues to grapple with funding difficulties. It has already been mentioned that the Government intends developing a policy in this regard to sustain the Scheme, taking cognisance of the fact that funding is a major challenge for NHIA. The Committee has nothing more to recommend in that respect, except to say that the Government must expedite action to help save the situation permanently.

    Based on the observations and recommendations made afore, the Committee recommends to the House to approve the Proposed Formula for the Disbursement of the National Health Insurance Fund for 2019.

    Respectfully submitted.
    Mr Kwabena M. Akandoh (NDC -- Juaboso) 12:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to second the Motion and in so doing, I wish to refer you to paragraph 5.1 on page 2 of the Committee's Report. I beg to quote:
    “The object of the Fund is to pay for healthcare services of members of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS).”
    Mr Speaker, this is the object of the Fund. Every subscriber to the NHIS looks for prompt and quality healthcare. We cannot achieve this
    when we continue to owe the service providers for multiple months. A typical example was reported on the front page of yesterday's Daily Graphic newspaper, that the Cape Coast Hospital is in distress and threatening to deny NHIS card holders care.
    Mr Speaker, this is very dangerous, especially when the President appeared on the floor of the House and indicated to the whole world that the NHIS is now buoyant and back to life. I do not think any scheme that is back to life would struggle to survive.
    Dr A. A. Osei 12:30 p.m.
    On a point of order. Mr Speaker, we have the Report and there is no reference to the President, so I do not know the relevance of where the Hon Member wants to go. The Report does not, in anywhere, talk about the President. I cannot tell if he sees the President in his imagination, but this type of imagination is dangerous. An Hon Member of Parliament reads a Report on the floor of the House, and claims that he sees the President in the Chamber. It is dangerous; I do not know what he ate this morning. [Laughter.]
    Mr Speaker 12:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, speak within the parameters of the Report that is competently before the House.
    Mr Akandoh 12:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am guided, but now that you have invited me to quote portions of the Report, I would want to refer to items numbered 4 and 19 in Appendix C.
    Mr Speaker 12:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, please, read it.
    Mr Akandoh 12:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, with all due respect, please allow me to finish with what I want to say, then I would quote it.
    Mr Speaker 12:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, unless you read what is in the Report, you cannot speak to it. That is the rule of debate. You have my permission to read out what exactly you would want to refer to, and then you can comment on it within the context of that statement.
    Mr Akandoh 12:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, item numbered 4 on Appendix C talks about funds for ambulance services -- [Interruption.]
    Mr Speaker 12:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, please, read what the Report says.
    Mr Akandoh 12:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, item numbered 4.0 in Appendix C says and I beg to quote:
    “4.5 Ambulance Service; 4.6 Support for Allied Health Professional Council Project; 4.9 Malaria Vector Control; 4.12 Tetanus Immunisation, 4.13 Anti-snake W/African Polyvalent Sera; 4.18 Fellow- ship for Continuing Students''.
    Mr Speaker, this is what we would use the NHI Fund for.
    Again, with your permission, I beg to quote item numbered 19.0, which says:
    “Corporate Social Responsi- bility”
    We would use the NHIS Fund for corporate social responsibility, while we struggle to pay service providers. This is a dangerous development.
    Dr A. A. Osei 12:30 p.m.
    On a point of order. Mr Speaker, you asked the Hon Member to read what is in the Report; but with respect, he read: “Support for Allied Health Professional Council Project''. He indicated just the number, but the amount I have in my Report for it is 0.00. I do not know which number he read. I am sorry, but I believe there is a problem somewhere.
    Mr Speaker 12:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, you have to speak within the parameters of the Report. It is not an occasion to make a Statement on the NHIS. Please, stick to the Report.
    Mr Akandoh 12:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am sticking to the Report and quoting relevant portions from it. That is exactly what I have done, and I do not know whether it is a strategy for the Hon Member to distort my submissions.
    Mr Speaker, on item numbered 19 in the table, which is “Corporate Social Responsibility'', an amount of GH¢5.11 million would be used from the NHI Fund for corporate social responsibility. It looks as though the NHI Fund is the only source of funding for the health sector.
    Mr Speaker, per the Abuja Declaration, we are supposed to invest not less than 15 per cent of our annual budget into the health sector, and that is what we must begin to interrogate.
    Mr Speaker, paragraph 13.9 on page 10 of the Report talks about “Active Membership Coverage''.
    Dr A. A. Osei 12:30 p.m.
    On a point of order. Mr Speaker, the Hon Member referred to item numbered 13.9 on page 10 as “Active Membership Coverage'', and said it had declined; but in line 3 of the same paragraph, it says, and with your permission I beg to quote:
    “..the Authority estimates to cover 12.4 million..''
    From 10.4 million, it went to 12.4 million but he says it has decreased. I do not know which mathematics he used. Which algebra did he use? I am surprised.
    Mr Speaker 12:30 p.m.
    Hon Member, please show your scale of decline. [Laughter.]
    Mr Akandoh 12:30 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am happy on your ruling, but I wish that would be the Hon Member's last interjection.
    Mr Speaker, with your permission, I beg to quote page 17 of the Formula for 2017, which is “Registration Coverage'':
    “the population of Ghana in 2016 was estimated at 27.497

    million, but in 2017 it was projected to be 29.409 million. Current registration figures for the period ending 31st December, 2016 indicates an active membership of 10.786 million''.

    Mr Speaker, that was the actuals. What the Hon Member talked about are projections.

    Mr Speaker, again, with your permission, I beg to quote page 14 of the Report on the NHI Fund Allocation Formula in 2017:

    “The population of Ghana in 2017 was estimated at 29--”

    Mr Speaker, again, while the Government collects more revenue -- the actual releases to the National Health Insurance Scheme is also decreasing.

    Mr Speaker, again, the Report

    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Hon Dr A. A. Osei, are you on your feet or you are sitting? — [Laughter.]
    Hon Member, proceed.
    Mr Akandoh 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, actually, the document that was given to the Committee, on page 9, one realises that they reported on the actuals, the budgeted allocations and the releases. In 2016, the Report indicated that the actual release was around GH¢742 million. In 2017, the actual release was around GH¢616 million, and GH¢506 million in 2018. Do we see the trend? It is dangerous for the Scheme.
    Mr Speaker, again, the interna- tional practice is that, we are supposed to use between 75 per cent and 80 per cent of the Funds for the service providers. If we look at the table again, we would realise that we use about 60.64 per cent to pay service providers, while the Scheme is struggling, and that is highly unacceptable.
    Mr Speaker, as if that is not enough, if we look at what we are pumping into Information and Communication Technology (ICT), it is as if we have created the Scheme because of ICT. We pump not less than GH¢300 million into ICT, and I refer to Appendix C, items 4.22, 7.2, 7.3, 8, 9, 11.1, 12, 15 and 17; all talk about ICT. If we sum them up, we are in the region of GH¢300 million. This is highly unacceptable.
    Mr Speaker, again, if we go to Appendix C and refer to item 16, they make reference to NHIS restruc- turing. After budgeting for about GH¢300 million for ICT, they have
    also made provision of GH¢10 million for NHIS restructuring. What at all would they restructure?
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Hon Member, you would now conclude in seconding the Motion. [Laughter.]
    Mr Akandoh 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, is it about the rationalisation of the benefit packages or the review of the exemptions that they are talking about? If we do not begin to scrutinise the budget of the National Health Insurance Scheme and streamline things, we may laugh at the wrong side of our mouths. This is a very sensitive Scheme; if we do not do that, its sustainability would be jeopardised.
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Indeed, you have seconded the Motion, and in doing so — [Laughter.]
    Question proposed.
    Mr Speaker 12:40 p.m.
    Shall we have one contribution from this Side?
    Dr Sebastian N. Sandaare (NDC — Daffiama/Bussie/Issa) 12:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you very much for the opportunity to contribute to the Motion that this House approves the Proposed Formula for the disburse- ment of the National Health Insurance Fund for the year 2019.
    Dr Sebastian N. Sandaare (NDC — Daffiama/Bussie/Issa) 12:50 p.m.
    short, we see a declining trend in terms of active membership coverage for this country.
    Mr Speaker, it means that we are denying the poor and vulnerable the right to access national health insurance, which is a Scheme meant for them.
    We are in interesting times. In 2016, just before 2017, the message for this country was that the Scheme was in coma. In 2016, the coverage was 40 per cent, decreased to 37 per cent in 2017, and further decreased to 34.7 per cent in 2018. I am a medical doctor, and we now have evidence that the Scheme is in serious coma, and that is why I support that these Funds should be released to support NHIA to actively revive our National Health Insurance Scheme.
    Mr Speaker, this is another indication of the performance of our economy. The performance of the health system in any country is a reflection of the performance of the economy. Therefore, if our National Health Insurance Scheme is collapsing, then it is an indication that the fundamentals of the economy are not right. [Hear! Hear!] This is because, the Scheme is meant for the poor, but they are being denied access to adequate healthcare services in this country. If we go on with this trend, we cannot achieve Universal Health Coverage by the year 2030.
    Mr Speaker, while the trend is decreasing, the percentage of non-
    core services funded by NHIA is rather increasing. This means we are deviating from the core mandate of the Scheme, into funding non-core activities of the Ministry of Health, and we have to be cautious and we have to be worried.

    Mr Speaker, on research activities, if you go to item 13.11 which is on page 11, it reads:

    “It would be recalled that in 2018, no provision was made for purposes best known to the officials of the National Health Insurance Authority.”

    Mr Speaker, this is not accurate. In the year 2018, GH¢0.15 million was allocated for research purposes. But in their Report, they have stated that they did not use even a single cedi to do any research yet in 2019, they are budgeting the same amount of GH¢0.15 million for research. Therefore, the advice to them is that, this year around, they should make sure that they do some research especially when we are having a declining trend of active membership. It is important to research to find out why we are declining in the active membership coverage.

    Mr Speaker, in conclusion, there is the need to ensure that we all have a national discussion on how to revive the National Health Insurance Scheme. So, I call for the same bipartisan or in this case, multi- partisan discussion, not only limited

    to saving the cedi but we should all come together to ensure that we save the National Health Insurance Scheme from collapsing.
    Dr Mark Assibey-Yeboah (NPP -- New Juaben South) 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would want to speak briefly to the Motion.
    Mr Speaker, the main sources of funds for the NHIA are the National Health Insurance Levy (NHIL) and 2.5 per cent of employees' contributions to SSNIT. These are the two main sources. So, if you go to Table 1 on page 5, you would see the sources of funds. The two main ones highlighted there are 1.2 billion cedis from the NHIL and about GH¢485 million from the SSNIT contribution. If you add these two figures, that gives us about GH¢1.69 billion. The contribution from the levies and the employees' contribution to SSNIT is gh¢1.692 billion.
    Mr Speaker, GH¢1.692 billion cedis was the amount that was approved in the 2019 Budget Statement for the NHIA. So, you would see that the Hon Chairman of the Committee amended his Report and said that the GH¢700 million at the bottom of the Table 1 be referred to as a funding gap. Earlier in the Report, it was captured as Mid-year Government Budget Support.
    Mr Speaker, when we have approved the Budget Statement for the year, everybody is to stay within the confines of the approvals. So, if you have a funding gap, we treat it as such. We are not sure if the Hon Minister for Finance would come back to the House with a supplementary budget. A midyear review would come, but a midyear review is totally different from a supplementary budget.
    So, I would just want to highlight this one for the Ministry of Finance and the Minister for Health to note that the GH¢700 million that we have captured here as ‘funding gap' is not guaranteed. It would only happen when the Minister for Finance comes back to the House with a supplemen- tary budget. If it is the case that he is coming with a supplementary budget, then as Hon Minister for Health, he should insist that this GH¢700 million be captured in the supplementary budget.
    Mr Speaker, otherwise, all the programmes that they have outlined in Appendix C, where the Minister has budgeted and made allocations to the tune of 2.5 billion cedis which they do not have -- [Interruption] -- They have 1.69 billion cedis, but their budget says they are going to spend monies to the tune of 2.5 billion cedis. That can only happen when you get the additional 700 million cedis.
    So, we are urging the Hon Minister for Health and Hon Minister for Finance to collaborate because for me, NHIS should be fully funded. And so if there is a funding gap of 700
    Dr Mark Assibey-Yeboah (NPP -- New Juaben South) 12:50 p.m.


    million, as we make this approval, then of necessity, we would have to see a supplementary budget in July. Otherwise, this approval we are giving will be of no effect and that GH¢700 million cedis funding gap would still remain.

    Mr Speaker, so this is the only thing I would want to highlight in this, that because of this funding gap, there must be a supplementary budget in the month of July.

    I thank you, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    Leadership?
    rose
    Alhaji Muntaka 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would yield to the Hon Member.
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    Hon Adongo?
    Mr Cassiel A. B. Forson (NDC -- Ajumako/Enyan/Essiam) 12:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I heard “Hon Adongo” but my name is not Hon Adongo; my name is Hon Cassiel Ato Forson. [Laughter.] It is just to remind you.
    Mr Speaker, I rise to support the Motion that was moved by the Hon Second Deputy Speaker --
    Mr Speaker 12:50 p.m.
    Hon Adongo's seat is vacant and I thought he had migrated like yesterday. [Laughter.]
    Mr Forson 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, he has not migrated today. He is at where he sits.
    Mr Speaker, I would like to once again reiterate the point that the Chairman of the Finance Committee raised and to say that gradually, this Honourable House is encouraging the NHIA to be fiscally indiscipline. I say this because almost every year, we as a House, approve funding gap for NHIA without recourse to the Budget Statement. The Budget Statement has made an allocation of which all institutions had to ensure that they stayed within the budget. But unfortunately, every year, we approve a budget in excess of what Budget Statement and Appropriation Act have allocated to the NHIA.
    When that happens, we are trying to tie the hands of the Ministry of Finance and the Hon Minister for Finance to ensure he can get money for the NHIA even though there may not be other means of getting that money. If you are to go into the details, you would notice that there is a reason the NHIA is struggling. Probably, as a House, we would need to intervene and support the NHIA.
    Mr Speaker, if you are to look at their two main sources of financing or getting their revenue, the first one is from the NHIL and the second one is coming from the SSNIT contribution. Per the law, they are supposed to get 2.5 per cent. The Budget Statement made an allocation of GH¢1.895 billion which is approximately GH¢1.9 billion.
    Mr Speaker, again, the SSNIT contribution is amounting to GH¢485
    million. If you are to put the two together, it is about GH¢2.4 billion. But the Ministry of Finance only allocated an amount of GH¢1.6 billion to the NHIA. This means, almost GH¢700 million has been taken from the NHIA as a result of the Capping and Realignment Act.
    Mr Speaker, in spite of that, if we are to look at the Budget Statement, we would notice at page 278 of the Budget Statement that they have also decided to realign Central Govern- ment expenditure amounting to GH¢187.9 million to the NHIA. This means an amount of almost GH¢900 million, close to a billion has been taken from the NHIA. So that is the reason the Authority is struggling.

    Mr Speaker, personally, I believe that the National Health Insurance Authority itself is the single most important social service that this country needs. So, if for any reason, I believe that we should exempt the National Health Insurance Authority from the Capping and Realignment Act, 2017. It is important and until we do that, the Authority would continue to struggle because they are now piling up debt. Service providers are struggling because they do not have the money to pay.

    Mr Speaker, we have to take a bold decision as a House and recommend to the Ministry of Finance

    to exempt the National Health Insurance Authority from the Capping and Realignment Act, 2017. Mr Speaker, that is the most important social service for all of us because healthcare is important for all of us. Without healthcare, as a country, we would clearly not be able to --

    Mr Speaker, another concern that I have is that, if you are to look at the 2018 use of proceeds -- in fact, in the 2018 Budget Statement an amount of GH¢358.85 million was allocated for the purposes of paying allowances for nursing trainees. Mr Speaker, that is not right and if you look at paragraph 13.7 on page 10 of the Report, the Committee was indeed displeased by this act. Mr Speaker, this cannot continue and so I strongly believe that it is not prudent for us as a nation to use moneys for national health insurance for purposes of paying for allowances of nursing trainees.

    Mr Speaker, no; the moneys must be used for the core mandate and that is to ensure that we are all healthy. They should use it to pay for the claims and not to allow the moneys to be used in a manner that would constrain the Authority from funds to the extent that they cannot perform their mandate.

    Mr Speaker, I would only caution that the Authority is becoming fiscally indiscipline as a result of govern-

    ment's policies. So, this would come back and haunt all of us one day when the Authority would not have the needed funds and government must be the one to bail them out.

    Mr Speaker, with these few words, I wish to support the Motion but I believe that this Honourable House would make the strong recommendation to the Ministry of Finance to exempt the National Health Insurance Authority from the Capping and Realignment Act, 2017.

    Mr Speaker, thank you.
    Mr Speaker 1 p.m.
    Hon Member, thank you very much.

    Hon Minister?
    Minister for Health (Mr Kwaku Agyeman-Manu)(MP) 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I just want to thank my Hon Colleagues for their indication and intention to adopt the Committee's Report. I have taken note of all the comments and I believe that, next year some of these comments would be reflected and those that could be worked on this year would be done.
    Mr Speaker 1 p.m.
    Hon Members, at the conclusion of the debate --
    Hon First Deputy Speaker, any comment?
    Mr Osei-Owusu 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I wish to thank all the contributors and I only wish to observe that when the Hon Ranking Member observed that the active users have gone down, it only suggests that people are probably eating well and are not getting sick as they used to.
    Mr Speaker, on this note, I pray that Hon Members would over- whelmingly vote in support of the Motion. Mr Speaker, thank you.
    Mr Speaker 1 p.m.
    Thank you very much.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Mr Speaker 1 p.m.
    Hon Majority Leader, where do we go from here?
    Which item is ready?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we could take item numbered 11.
    Mr Speaker 1 p.m.
    Hon Members, item numbered 11.
    Hon Chairman of the Committee on Finance?
    GoG - Poly Changda Overseas Engineering Company Ltd Seller's Credit/Financing
    Agreement to Finance the Execution and Completion of the Military Housing Project
    Chairman of the Committee (Dr Mark Assibey-Yeboah) 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move, that this Honourable House adopts the Report of the Finance Committee on the Seller's Credit/Financing Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and Poly Changda Overseas Engineering Company Limited of the People's Republic of China for an aggregate amount of one hundred million United States dollars (US$100,000,000.00) to finance the execution and completion of the Military Housing Project for the Ministry of Defence.
    Mr Speaker, in so doing, I beg to present your Committee's Report.
    Introduction
    The Seller's Credit/Financing Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Ghana and Poly Changda Overseas Engineering Company Limited of the People's Republic of China for an aggregate amount of one hundred million United States dollars (US$100,000,000.00) to finance the execution and completion of the Military Housing Project for the Ministry of Defence was presented to the House on
    Thursday, 21st March, 2019 by the Honourable Minister responsible for Defence, Mr Dominic Bingab Aduna Nitiwul, on behalf of the Minister for Finance.
    Pursuant to article 103 of the 1992 Constitution and Orders 158, 169 and 171 of the Standing Orders of the House, the Agreement was referred to the Finance Committee and the Leadership of the Committee on Defence and Interior for consideration and report.
    The Finance Committee and the Leadership of the Committee on Defence and Interior (hereinafter jointly referred to as “the Com- mittee”) subsequently met and discussed the Agreement with the Minister for Defence, Hon Dominic Bingab Aduna Nitiwul, Deputy Minister for Finance, Hon Abena Osei-Asare, as well as officials from the Ministries of Finance and Defence and the Ghana Armed Forces.
    The Committee hereby submits this Report to the House pursuant to Order 161(1) of the Standing Orders of the House.
    The Committee is grateful to the Honourable Minister for Defence, the Deputy Minister for Finance and their officials for attending upon the Committee.
    References
    The Committee referred to and was guided by the following documents
    Chairman of the Committee (Dr Mark Assibey-Yeboah) 1 p.m.


    inter alia during its deliberations on the Agreement:

    The 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana;

    The Standing Orders of the Parliament of Ghana;

    The Public Financial Manage- ment Act, 2016 (Act 921);

    Background

    Currently, the Ghana Armed Forces (GAF) is facing an acute problem with respect to accommoda- tion for its men, women and serving officers. The Government has, as part of its programme, a plan to ensure that the Forces are provided with newly constructed accommodation and also to rehabilitate the existing dilapidated ones.

    In June 2017, His Excellency the President cut the sod for the construction of four (4) housing units for the GAF, whilst twenty (20) blocks commenced in Tamale from the internally-generated funds (IGF) of the GAF.

    From year-to-year, new officers are being enlisted and other ranks recruited. There is now a situation where senior officers, including majors and lieutenant colonels are living in single rooms originally designed for young and unmarried

    officers for a period before they are reassigned fresh accommodation.

    In the light of the accommodation challenges facing the Forces, the Project has been formulated by the Government to help ameliorate the situation.

    The Consortium of Poly Tech- nologies Inc. and Poly Changda Overseas Engineering Company Limited Group has been working with the GAF for the past fifteen (15) years and has successfully undertaken various projects such as the following:

    a. The construction of Aircraft Hangers at the Tamale and Takoradi Air Force Bases;

    b. The construction of the Ghana Armed Forces Integrity Savings and Loans Company Office;

    c. The construction of acco- mmodation for troops; and

    d. The construction of the new military cemetery at Burma Camp, among others.

    Project Objective

    The objective of the Project is to help provide the GAF with decent and modern accommodation to enable them to perform their core function of defending the territorial integrity of Ghana.

    Terms and Condition of the Facility

    The terms and conditions of the Seller's Credit Facility are as follows:

    Facility Amount -- USS100.00 million.

    Grace Period -- 0.5 years.

    Repayment Period -- 7 years.

    Repayment Frequency -- Semi-annual frequency.

    Interest Rate -- US Libor + a margin of 4.0 per cent.

    Management Fee -- 0.50 per cent flat of the facility amount.

    Sinosure Premium -- 5.5 per cent flat of the facility amount and the total interest payable.
    Chairman of the Committee (Dr Mark Assibey-Yeboah) 1 p.m.


    SPACE FOR APPENDIX -- PAGE 11, 1.00 PM
    MR FIRST DEPUTY SPEAKER
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1 p.m.
    Yes, Hon Ato Cassiel?
    Mr Cassiel A. B. Forson (NDC -- Ajumako/Enyan/Essiam) 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to second the Motion moved by the Hon Chairman of the Finance Committee.
    Mr Speaker, in seconding the Motion, I wish to say that the Agreement before us is a seller's credit one. In other words, it means the contractor is lending the Government of Ghana money for the purposesof constructing buildings of that particular agreement which is between the GoG and the contractor.
    Mr Speaker, as we looked at the terms, it is in excess of eight per cent - very commercial. To be precise, it is 8.28 per cent all-in cost. We looked at it and felt it was high. Looking at the military nature of the agreement and knowing very well that military credit sometimes are higher than other credits, we found that to be satisfactory, even though it is high.
    Mr Speaker, again, we raised some few concerns. The first concern emanating from the fact that we were told that the contractor is sourcing the money from their head office in China, particularly, getting a loan from a Chinese bank. What I personally ask is to find out how much they are
    actually getting the loan for if indeed they are getting the loan lower and probably charging Government of Ghana higher. This is important because in my opinion, they are making profit on the back of the construction itself, and I still think that they should not be making profit on the back of the loan facility itself. So there is the need for us to find out. We were told they would provide the information in due course. We are still waiting.
    Mr Speaker, again, we were told that the loan itself was sourced through sole sourcing. We wanted to find out from the Ministry whether if it is sole sourcing, had the value-for-money audit been conducted. We were told that they have not conducted it, they are in the process to have that done through an agency called Crown Agents.
    Mr Speaker, unfortunately, often times as we have seen, if we are to get a loan whereas we have not done the value-for-money audit, we incorporate that as a prior action or a condition precedent for drawdown.
    Looking at the agreement, there was no condition precedent for drawdown whereas we would see value-for-money as a condition precedent.
    Mr Speaker, I think that of recent, we are seeing a number of loan agreements and commercial agreements coming to the House without value-for-money audit. Anytime we ask, we have been told
    Dr Assibey-Yeboah 1 p.m.
    On a point of order. Mr Speaker, earlier, the Hon Ranking Member said he did not understand why we would have a survey and design fee and also contractor's consultancy fee. I would want to point it out to him that when one is building a house and one contracts an architect to give you the designs, that would attract the survey and design fee. And when the architect comes to supervise the work, he would charge him further.
    Mr Speaker, as a matter of fact, the average consultancy fee, which we have heard severally in this House, is about six per cent of the contract sum. So if I add the consultancy fee to the survey and design fee, which is US$6 million, that is six per cent of the contract sum, and it is within limits.
    Mr Forson 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we were made to believe that this is what we call a turnkey project, and that in a turnkey project, the design is part of the construction, which cost the contractor bears. That is why I strongly believe that that cannot be a
    standalone cost item. We would have to investigate it.
    Mr Speaker, that is why I started my argument with the premise that we would need the value-for-money audit.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1 p.m.
    Hon Ranking Member, you are part of the Committee. You are asking us now to investigate what you were supposed to do at the Committee and report to us. So what were you doing at the Committee?
    Mr Forson 1 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am not asking the House to investigate the matter. I raised the matter I am talking about now at the Committee level. I am addressing the House's attention to the fact that these are serious matters and we should ensure that a value-for-money audit is being done. That is my position. I am only asking that we need the value-for-money audit. I would not have raised these issues if the value-for-money audit had been done and passed.
    Mr Speaker, again, the last point I was raising relates to the site preparation and the deployment cost. In my opinion, deployment cost is transportation cost, and it should be part of the unit cost and should not be a standalone item.
    Again, if we look at the unit cost of site preparation, they are in the BoQ, yet we are seeing site preparation also appearing to the tune of US$3.9 million. These are issues that we need to investigate.
    Mr Speaker, I would conclude by saying that even if we are to look at some of the cost items, a two- bedroom flat is estimated to cost US$54,000. All I want to know is that this has gone through value-for-money audit and has indeed passed. I am only requesting the House that, in future, we should make value-for-money audit as a condition precedent in every agreement that we pass. It should be a condition precedent. The House should make recommendation to the Ministry of Finance so that we would see it as a condition precedent. So, without the value-for-money audit, we would not be able draw down on the facility.
    Often times, the Ministries come to this Honourable House giving us assurances that the value-for-money audit would be done. As a House, we do not go back to find out whether those value-for-money audits have been done. That is why I am saying that the only way we can tie the hands of the Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) to do the right thing is for us to ensure that it becomes a condition precedent in the agreements.
    If there are conditions precedent in the agreement, they have no choice than to ensure that that value for money audit has been done, and then in the end, we would all be happy; the right thing would be done and mother Ghana would win.
    Thank you Mr Speaker.
    Dr Anthony A. Osei (NPP --Old Tafo) 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I sympa-thise with my good Friend and Hon Ranking Member who used to be in the Ministry of Finance.
    I want to remind him of an incident which I am sure he is aware of. In the Ministry, to build health facilities, a value-for-money audit was done, but the Hon Minister wrote something contrary to what the value-for-money audit said, and that project, as I speak, has not been completed.
    Mr Speaker, the law is very simple. It says that if there is a sole source, there has to be value for money. Look at item 6.3 in the Report, all those things he is talking about, as I speak, have been submitted to Crown Agents, the only group for value for money that we have here. That is one of the difficulties we have.
    Mr Speaker, this history of Crown Agents is that it was initially funded by the British, with some grant. Now, they charge fees, but they are the only ones, so sometimes when projects go there, they stay four years when the project would have been completed.
    So I agree with him. We need more value-for-money agents in addition to Crown Agents, but the law says that we have to submit it there, because this project would be completed in about two years. Crown Agents report may come in about five years. What we said at the Committee which he has forgotten was that we are
    requesting the Hon Minister for Finance to come back to this House with a copy of the value-for-money audit, so on record we know that it has been done. We do not do that, so we should emphasise that instead.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Member has spoken on the breakdown in the Appendix. It is better to be more transparent by opening up the items than put them all under construction cost, that is why it is separated, and he said in his opinion deployment is transportation cost.
    Mr Speaker, we are not talking about opinions here. This contract is being referred to the Defence and Interior Committee with all the necessary information that would come back later to this House. We were supposed to look at the terms and conditions, and as he said, on monetary matters, it is difficult to get a loan for the Military.
    If you were an Hon Member of the Committee on Defence and Interior and you went with us to visit some of the accommodation of the Military, you would wonder why some of them are still part of the Military.
    An Hon Member 1:20 p.m.
    Are you still a Member?
    Dr A. A.Osei 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am still an Hon Member of the Committee on Defence and Interior. We would be looking at the contract agreement. In particular, in Tamale, I do not want to describe the living conditions of the Military in Tamale.
    You can go to Michel Camp; you can go all around. It is not very good.
    Mr Speaker, I have lived in places where the Military headquarters looks like a five star hotel. They have to go and defend us; at least, they should have some comfort and sleep well to be able to go and fight, but Mr Speaker, as you are aware, if you drive around the Police Hospital and you look at the living quarters of the Fire Service, you would see all those refrigerators outside, then when we have a fire outbreak we wonder why they are very late in coming.
    The Military is a very respectable institution. They are performing wonders for us in several countries including Sudan, Ivory Coast and DR Congo. This is one of the few times that we are doing such a huge housing project for them, and I would urge all Hon Members to look at it from that angle.
    This is only the beginning, and I would urge the Ministry of Finance to look for more funds to make sure that our Military is well accom- modated.
    Mr Speaker, with these few words I would urge all Hon Members of this House, including our architect Friend Hon Bedzrah, who I am told charges eight per cent, to --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:20 p.m.
    Hon Bedzrah, do you charge eight per cent?
    Mr Bedzrah 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it depends on the project. Normally our professional fees range from six per cent to as much as 45 per cent -- [Interruption] -- [Pause.]
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:20 p.m.
    Hon Member, ignore them and address me.
    Dr A. A. Osei 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am about to finish. He has just confirmed that apparently he even charges more than eight per cent, so he has admitted it --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:20 p.m.
    Hon Member, you are out of order.
    Dr A. A. Osei 1:20 p.m.
    Thank you, Mr Speaker.
    With those few words, I would urge Hon Members to support the Motion.
    Mr Emmanuel K. Bedzrah (NDC -- Ho West) 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you for the opportunity to contribute to the Motion and also add my voice.
    Our Military personnel, officers, men and women who defend this country need accommodation in their barracks. As a matter of fact, when you visit some of the barracks, it is an eyesore. You have married men and women sharing one accommodation. I grew up in the barracks, and therefore, I understand some of these challenges that they have, and I know that all governments have been doing very well to support them, and therefore, I do not think anybody in this House would not support this Facility.
    Mr Emmanuel K. Bedzrah (NDC -- Ho West) 1:20 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I want to urge that the commercial agreement should be brought to the House -- it should be referred to both the Committee on Defence and Interior and the Committee on Works and Housing, because I see a lot of things in the Bill of Quantities and I want to point them out.
    If it has already been referred to the Committee on Defence and Interior, then the Committee on Works and Housing should be included.
    Mr Speaker, in your Committee's Report, if you look at page 7, item 6.7, you would notice that the contract sum is a fixed sum contract. In quantity surveying, fixed sum contract means that it cannot be varied. If you would permit me, I would read it to you. It says:
    The Committee noted that clause 14.1 of the Agreement provides that “the Contract Price is one hundred million United States dollars only (US$100,000, 000.00) excluding taxes and duties. The Contract Price shall remain fixed for the Construction Period.”
    Now, that is my problem. If it is a fixed sum contract, then it means that we cannot add to or deduct from it. Whether the project has been done according to the measurement, we do not know, and this is a turnkey contract. Turnkey contract means that you are designing construction and handing over the key to the client, so the issue of consultancy would only be added when the client realises that
    he needs an external consultant, and that cost would be borne by the client, not the contractor.
    So adding this cost of the US$4 million to the contractor's consultancy fee is not the best. It is not done anywhere, because if you are a turnkey contractor, you are supposed to design, construct the project and hand over the key to the client, and if the client wants to take any external consultant, then they must look for money outside the construc-tion fee and pay for it. That is a fixed sum contract.
    Mr Speaker, my Hon Colleague made mention of item 9 of the Appendix, and you would realise that site preparation and deployment of project construction material -- [Interruption.] In building your unit cost, you would have not recorded transportation cost, labour and plant cost. They are all part and parcel of the unit cost, and you multiply with the quantity to give you the sum that you are looking for, so for you to separate the transportation of deployment of material as a separate material becomes problematic.

    Mr Speaker, so when you have items that have been taken care of in the BoQ and you have another item again in the summary sheet, it means you are double counting, and that is why we need a value-for-money audit and also the commercial agreement should come for us to look at it.

    Mr Speaker, to wind up, the Committee indicated that the Contractor has been working with the Ministry of Defence for 15 years --
    rose
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:30 a.m.
    Hon Member, hold on. Yes, Hon Member for Old Tafo?
    Dr A. A. Osei 1:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Member is misleading this House. He has moved from the Finance Committee's Report to the Bill of Quantities document. We are not looking at that.
    The reason that document has come is precisely to go into more details of what we have generalised here. It does not mean that it is charged to us. No. That is not why we listed a few things but there are details in the Bill of Quantities (BOQ) which have been referred to the Committee on Defence and Interior . Most people do not have that document here, so if he moves in between the two, he would mislead us.
    It is a contract agreement that has come but he is referring to it as if it is the same as this document. The two are not the same. I know the Hon Member is a Quantity Surveyor but he should not give us the impression that the two are the same.
    Mr Bedzrah 1:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, they just lifted a summary of what we have as Appendix from the BoQ and I am quoting from it, so there is no contradiction. He is a member of the Finance Committee and he should have it.
    Mr Speaker, to conclude, the Finance Committee stated that the Contractor has been working with the Ministry of Defence for the past 15 years and that they have constructed aircraft hangers at Tamale and Takoradi Air Force Bases, Ghana Armed Forces Integrity Savings and Loans Company office and acco- mmodation for troops. But we do not know where those accommodation have been constructed. Lastly, there is a new military cemetery at Burma Camp.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:30 a.m.
    Hon Member, address me.
    rose
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:30 a.m.
    Hon Member, he has concluded. You intervened on a number of occasions.
    Dr A. A. Osei 1:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is a very serious statement the Hon Member made. He said that in his opinion, the contractor is incapable. This is the same contractor who built the hanger. If he does not remember

    the case of the hanger, does he want me to remind him?

    He was in this Parliament when this hanger issue came up on this Floor. It is the same contractor who built it and I would not tell him who visited that contractor. He knows that, but he is saying that he is incapable of doing that. He has already done work for us.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:30 a.m.
    Hon Colleagues, let us speak to the Report. The Committee has reported to us and he is free to express any other opinion, but we should speak to the Report.
    Yes, Leadership?
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim (NDC -- Banda) 1:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, having listened to the contributions and having lived in a barracks for about three years in Kumasi, I urge you to put the Question.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:30 a.m.
    Yes, Majority Leadership?
    Mr Osei Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu (NPP -- Suame) 1:30 a.m.
    Mr Speaker, when a person from the Leadership of the Minority rises to strongly urge you to put the Question, there must be something wrong with his own anticipations. [Laughter.]
    I have just a few comments. First of all, Hon Members have spoken to the need for value-for-money audit. I agree with them that we need to have this. As to whether the Executive
    would be able to serve us with the Value-for-Money Report in due time, we are not too sure about that.
    Mr Speaker, I keep reminding Committees of this House that we have an allocation for some form of due diligence to be conducted. An amount has been set aside for that purpose and though it may not be very thorough, it may be informative to us. The Committee does not access it, yet we come round to say that there is the need for a value-for-money audit. Who is to blame?
    We should blame ourselves and not the Executive. We have an allocation, we decide not to use the allocation and we then come to Plenary to lament that the Executive has not been able to supply us with the Value for Money Audit Report. I do not know the number of times that I should speak to this matter.
    Mr Speaker, we would come to the financial and technical capability of the contractor when we come to the Contract Agreement. Hon Bedzrah knows that the issue he raised is very pre-emptive. He should let it go, let the Contract Agreement come and then we would be able to assess the technical and financial capability of the group. If we find them wanting, it lies within our hands to say “No, they do not have the competence to deal with this matter”. So, we strongly urge the Hon Minister to withdraw. We are not there yet, so the demonstration of his prowess, I believe is ill-timed for the time being.
    Let us get there and I believe that we would peruse this. It is pre - emotive
    Mr Speaker, I also agree that we really need to interrogate the figures. For all these structures, we have been informed that the cost of furniture is a mere US$4 million. I doubt that because if for all these structures, furnishing is US$4 million, that is woefully inadequate and pathetic. It means that somebody has not done his homework well on this and we need to have a second look at it.
    I was also drawing attention to what I saw in the Appendix of the Report, item numbered 7, that is Platoon Commanders' flat (four two bedroom flats) and the Hon Chairman of the Finance Committee was telling me that it would be more than four two- bedroom flats. Other than that, to have a projected figure of US$ 2 million for four two-bedroom flats, the amount would be outrageous. The Hon Chairman has told me that it may be more than that. [Interruption.] If it is 16 --
    Mr Forson 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, on a point of information. We looked at it at the Committee level and we were educated that one would cost
    US$54,000.
    So, it is 16 flats and not 4. That caught our attention and we interrogated the matter seriously.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:40 p.m.
    So, the record should reflect that, indeed, the US$2million covers 16 flats.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:40 p.m.
    For me, what is important is that our records should be accurate. The record of what the House is being called upon to approve should be clear so that if it has to be referred to, we would have the record correct.
    Dr Assibey-Yeboah 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, sometimes, we ask for too much information at the Committee on Finance. The Commercial Agreement is before the Committee on Defence and Interior and they would really have all the specifics. This is just a summary sheet of the project for our attention, but the fine details are in the Contract Agreement which Hon Members have copies of. Hon Bedzrah who is the Hon Chairman of the Committee on Defence and Interior told me that the meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday to consider the Contract Agreement.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:40 p.m.
    I do not have a problem with that, but once you decide to put something down, it should be accurate so that it does not become a source of confusion. If it is stated in this document that it is four, and yet the Report from the Committee on Defence and Interior comes out and it is 64, in future, it
    may be a source of conflict and confusion. So, let us have the appropriate record while we approve the terms.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the clarification offered by the Hon Chairman of the Committee is quite informative. Of course, in that regard, when we look at the facility itself, if it 64 as we are told, which would then translate into 31, 560 per flat -- [Interruption.] But when a flat is being costed, it is not that alone; there is the side preparation and whatever works that might have gone into it. For all we know, when they finish, the figure would have doubled.
    We need the Works and Housing Committee to interrogate the figures to see whether we would have value for money [Interruption.] That was why I said that in that regard, we do not need the Committee on Defence and Interior, but the Committee on Works and Housing.
    Mr Speaker, we want the best for the country and if we could make some savings to increase the numbers for the Ghana Armed Forces, so be it, and that should be our concern. We would procure 100 million and looking at a certain figure of facilities, but if we could make savings to provide for additional facilities why not? This is because on the face of this, just judging by the construction of a two-bedroom facility is US$31,000 and that alone is on the high side, plus the additional which would double the figure. We should
    be concerned as a House. If we make savings and we are to add to the number, all the better for us as a country. We need to interrogate the figures more.
    Mr Speaker, I thank you for the space allowed to contribute to the Motion.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:40 p.m.
    Hon Members, item numbered 12 -- By the Hon Minister for Finance.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I would want to seek your indulgence and that of the House to allow the Hon Minister for Monitoring and Evaluation to stand in and move the Motion on behalf of the Hon Minister for Finance.
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim. Mr Speaker, I would not want to belabour that point, but I believe once he does it today, next week, at least, any of the three Hon Deputy Ministers should endeavour to be in the House to move such sensitive Motions.
    RESOLUTIONS 1:40 p.m.

    THIS HONOURABLE HOUSE 1:40 p.m.

    HEREBY RESOLVES AS 1:40 p.m.

    Dr Mark Assibey-Yeboah 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I second the Motion.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Resolved accordingly.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:40 p.m.
    Yes, Hon Majority Leader?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, we could deal with item numbered 15 on page 7 on the Order Paper.
    MOTIONS 1:40 p.m.

    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Yaw F. Addo) 1:40 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to move that, that this Honourable
    House adopts the Report of the Committee on Environment, Science and Technology on the Further Amendment of the Montreal Protocol (Kigali Amendment of 14th October
    2016).
    In doing so, I present your Committee's Report.
    Introduction
    The Hon Deputy Minister for Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation, Ms Patricia Appiagyei on behalf of the Minister for Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation Prof. Kwabena Frimpong Boateng, on 5th March, 2019, laid before the House the Further Amendment to the Montreal Protocol (Kigali Amendment of October 2016).
    Pursuant to article 75 (2) (b) of the 1992 Constitution and Standing Order 185, Mr Speaker referred the Protocol to the Committee on Environment, Science and Technology for consideration and report to the House.
    The Committee met with the Director for Environment of the Ministry of Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation, Mr Fredua Agyemang, the Deputy Executive Director of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Mr Ebenezer Appiah- Sarpong and other technical and legal officers from the Environmental Protection Agency.
    The Committee is grateful to all of them for the elucidation provided on the Further Amendment to the Montreal Protocol (Kigali Amendment of October 2016).
    The Committee referred to the following documents during deliberations;
    Reference Documents
    The Committee referred to the following documents during delibera- tions;
    a. The 1992 Constitution of Ghana;
    b. The Standing Orders of the Parliament of Ghana;
    c. The Montreal protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (Concluded at Montreal in September
    1987);
    d. The Further Amendment to the Montreal Protocol (Kigali Amendment of October
    2016).
    Background Information
    The Montreal Protocol was signed on 16th September, 1987 but came into force on January 1st, 1989. It pioneered the global approach to tackling stratospheric ozone depiction by placing restrictions on the production and use of certain
    chemical substances and imposing worldwide emissions targets.
    The list of chemicals covered under the Protocol, among others, include chlorofluorocarbons which are used generally for refrigeration and as a blowing agent in the foam industry. The chlorofluorocarbons are considered controlled substances in view of their high Ozone Depletion Potential. Currently, they have been replaced with alternatives including Hydro-chlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and Hydro-fluorocarbons (HFCs).
    The Montreal protocol has been amended five (5) times. The Amend- ments are as follows: London (1990), Copenhagen (1992), Montreal (1997), Beijing (2000) and Kigali (2016). All the amendments sought to either include other Ozone Depletion Substances (ODS) or modify/revise the phase-out date.
    The Current amendment, (Kigali Amendment) was named just like the other amendments after the capital town of Rwanda where it was adopted by parties including Ghana. The amendment can be seen as part of the global approach to dealing with climate change. It is also the first to add a number of Hydro-fluoro- carbons (HFCs) to the controlled substances list due to their global warming potentials.
    Ghana currently has an obligation to ratify the Kigali Amendment in order to incorporate its provisions into our national laws. It would also contribute to the global efforts in
    safeguarding the climate and mitigate any negative effects of climate change to sustainable development.
    Justification for the Adoption of the Protocol
    The Kigali amendment is the latest step in the global push towards a cleaner and safer future for our climate. It also represents a concrete plan for reducing emissions of HFCs and meeting targets. The Challenge now is how to implement this plan in an economically and environmentally sustainable manner.
    The average energy consumption by the refrigeration and cooling sector was about 13.4 kilo watts per hour (KWh) in 2015. This is projected to rise to about 21.1 KWh by 2030. Improving the energy efficiency of refrigeration systems therefore plays a key role in climate change mitigation and represents an essential goal for future projects to facilitate the sustain- able development of the country.
    Phasing down the use of HFCs would help in the avoidance of an increase in atmospheric temperatures to 0.5 degree celcius by the end of the century. It would also contribute to about 25 per cent of the emission reduction target of the Paris Agreement. It would further reduce the emission of carbon dioxide (C02) equivalent in the atmosphere by 70 billion tons by 2050.
    There are trade restrictions to parties that do not ratify the Kigali
    Amendment in terms of access to the HFCs during the compliance period which will cause existing equipment running on HFCs to be redundant.
    The amendment would also promote alternative products with low Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP) such as Hydrocarbon (HC) which are energy efficient and climate friendly.
    The multilateral Fund for the implementation of the Montreal protocol, a financial mechanism of the protocol has already provided over US$35 billion to developing countries to phase out ozone-depleting substances. Developing countries that ratified the Kigali Amendment before the Conference of the Parties of November 2017 were acknowledged and given priority access to financial and technical support provided under the Protocol.
    Reservations
    Ghana signed the Montreal Protocol on 16th September, 1987 without any reservations. Having studied the text of the Kigali Amendment all reservations made by Parties during negotiations were factored into the final Amendment.
    Existing Legislations
    In 2005, a Regulation on the Management of Ozone Depleting Substances and Products was enacted (L.I 1812). The Regulation prohibited the import and export of controlled substances and products
    listed in Schedules 1 and 2. It however gave exemption to those who have permits from the EPA. Prohibition was further provided for the import and export of controlled substances or products from or to a country that is not a party to the Montreal Protocol.
    The Hazardous and Electronic Wastes and Other Wastes Act, 2016 (Act 917) provides for the control, management and disposal of hazardous, electrical and electronic waste. It prohibits the importation and exportation of hazardous wastes including used refrigerators and gas extracts from fridges.
    Regulation 14 of the Hazardous, Electrical and other Wastes (Classification), Control and Management Regulation, 2016 (L.I 2250) requires importers of fridges that contain Ozone Depleting Substances to provide information on their capacity to deal with the gases in the fridges before they are granted permission to import the used fridges.
    The Kigali Amendment introduces new substances to the Montreal Protocol that need to be controlled which were not earlier covered under L.I 1812. These would have to be incorporated in the L.I 1812 after ratification by the House.
    Ghana will however benefit from an amount of up to three million dollars ($3 million) from the Multilateral Fund under the Protocol
    to provide financial packages to owners of existing facilities (Cold stores, Supermarkets, Morgues) both private and government which are solely Ghanaian-owned to convert from HFC refrigerants to alternatives.
    Obligations of Government
    The ratification of the Protocol would give rise to government obligations to comply with and implement its provisions and amend existing regulations. The Management of Ozone Depleting Substances and Products Regulations 2005, L.I 1812 give effect to our obligations under the Montreal Protocol.
    Ghana will continue to use existing structures and implementing institutions such as EPA, Ghana Standards Authority and the Energy Commission to implement the provisions of the Amendment within the framework of their existing mandates.
    Financial Implications
    There will be no need for the creation of a new institution or department within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to carry out the activities required after ratification. The Ozone Unit of EPA which already serves as the focal point for the Montreal Protocol to which Ghana is a party is well positioned to integrate activities under the Amendment into the work plans. There will therefore be no additional costs to government if this amendment is ratified.
    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Yaw F. Addo) 1:40 p.m.


    Benefits under the Amendment

    There are four incentives in the Amendment of the Protocol for parties who ratify the Kigali Amendment. They are:

    a. Financial Mechanism

    Article 10 of the Montreal protocol establishes a financial mechanism to provide financial and technical co- operation including the transfer of technology to support parties who comply with the Protocol.

    b. Support to Article 5 Parties

    The 28th Meeting of the Parties made a number of key decisions regarding Multilateral Funds Support to Article 5 Members. They include the following;

    access funds,

    flexibility to priorities which of the list of HFCs to phase out earlier than others,

    define sectors,

    select technology and alterna- tives and elaborate and implement their strategies to meet agreed HFC obligations, based on their specific needs and national circumstances following a country- driven approach.

    Avoidance of Trade Controls

    Article 4 of the Montreal Protocol restricts parties from trading in

    controlled substances with states not parties to the Protocol.

    The restrictions would include trade in HFCs between parties and states that are not parties to the Kigali Amendment. The Amendment would therefore ensure that the country gains access to control of HFCs to service equipment such as refrigerators, air conditioners and other cold storage facilities until the phase out period.

    Phase-Down Approach

    The Amendment does not phase out HFCs completely but allows for the use of HFCs where there are no alternatives available.

    Observations

    The Committee realised that the implementation of the provisions in the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol will be successful only through thorough stakeholder consultation.

    The Committee was therefore pleased when it was informed that stakeholder meetings between the Ministry of Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation, Environmental Protection Agency, Super markets, Civil Engineering and Building Contractors Association, Importers of refrigerators and HFC Based products and Services and Air Conditioning Technicians Association had taken place and there was unanimity in the benefits that would
    Mr Ebenezer O. Terlabi (NDC -- Lower Manya Krobo) 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to second the Motion that this House adopts the Kigali Amendment of 14th October, 2016 before us.
    Mr Speaker, the essence of this Agreement is to regulate the use of substances that affect the ozone layer, therefore, causing increases in temperature and by extension, affecting our weather conditions. This Agreement seeks to control the main substance which is the hydro- fluorocarbon (HFCs) that when they are emitted, they would react and therefore, we have a lot more radiation from the sun getting to the surface of the earth.
    We are concerned about the effect of radiation and therefore, the need for us to look at the substances which when left, would lead to increase in temperature and the amount of energy we use in controlling temperatures in

    places like this. If temperatures are high, what it means is that we need more energy to reduce the temperature to the barest minimum.

    Mr Speaker, the Agreement seeks to regulate this and there is the need for us to support it, so that at the end of the day, the effect which would end up in climate change and cause the increase in the use of power and therefore, cost would be minimised.

    Mr Speaker, it is a very simple Agreement which seeks to eliminate some substances or to add to the ban of a tall list of substances which, when regulated, would help in controlling the weather and therefore, the climate. So, I believe that it would not be wrong as a House to support this Motion which seeks to inculcate these substances into regulated substances by this country. By so doing, we would also be contributing our quota to maintaining and therefore, reducing temperatures in the world as a whole.

    Mr Speaker, with these few words, I beg to second the Motion that this House adopts the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 1:50 p.m.
    Hon Members, before I open the matter up for discussion, let me direct that having regard to the state of Business in the House, the House shall Sit outside the regular Sitting hours.
    Question proposed.
    Dr Bernice A. Heloo (NDC - Hohoe) 1:50 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thank you for the opportunity to contribute to the Motion that this House adopts the Report of the Committee on Environ- ment, Science and Technology on the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol.
    Mr Speaker, the Kigali Amend- ment to the Montreal Protocol gives us all clear, concrete and mandatory targets with fixed timelines to the signatories to this accord.
    Mr Speaker, as it has been intimated already, the release of dangerous substances into the atmosphere would only eliminate mankind one day, if not controlled. Most of the substances we are talking about which are called Hydro- fluorocarbons are found in refrigera- tors and mainly in the foam industry. There is the need for us to regulate the emissions that come from the industries concerned, so as to save the world 70 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide, which otherwise, if released into the atmosphere can deplete the ozone layer and affect humankind in very adverse ways.
    Mr Speaker, it is gratifying to know that the Amendment has already been subscribed to by many countries. Even though the minimum was first at 20 countries, we now have about 65 countries having already ratified the Amendment. I believe Ghana will do well to do same, so as to save all of us.
    Mr Speaker, recently, we all heard of flooding following the Cyclone Idai
    that has left hundreds dead and more than one hundred thousand displaced in Mozambique, Zimbabwe and Malawi.
    Mr Speaker, similar catastrophes are reminders to us that urgent and drastic measures are required to deal with the phenomenon of climate change which is caused by some of the issues we are raising in the amendment proposed.
    Mr Speaker, Ghana must show her own commitment towards the International Environmental Treaty by ratifying this Agreement. I would therefore call on this Honourable House to adopt the Report and also consequently, the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol.
    Mr Speaker, I thank you for the opportunity offered me.
    Mr Robert K. Amoah (NPP -- Achiase) 2 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I thank you for the opportunity to add my voice to the Motion before the House.
    Mr Speaker, the global warming menace that is making the earth uninhabitable is manmade and it is man that needs the earth and not the other way round. That is why we need to take good care of the earth. The earth has existed for millions of years if not billions and it should not be destroyed in our time. It is our responsibility to keep the earth or make it a better place than we came to meet it. However, the question is what
    Mr Robert K. Amoah (NPP -- Achiase) 2 p.m.


    conscious contributions are we making to mitigate the global warming menace that is making the earth uninhabitable?

    Fortunately, our scientists assure us that there is hope if only we can change our behaviour. If we can change the importation and use of chlorofluoro- carbons in refrigerators to hydro- fluorocarbons. If we can desist from indiscriminate burning that sends volumes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere to increase ozone layer depletion.

    Mr Speaker, the bigger economies have greater responsibility in this regard but we also have a role to play. A short paragraph in our Report would do a lot of good and with your permission, I beg to read:

    “Ghana currently has an obligation to ratify the Kigali Amendment in order to incorporate its provisions into our national laws. It would also contribute to the global efforts in safeguarding the climate and mitigate any negative effect of climate change to sustainable development. The Kigali Amendment is the latest step in the global push towards a cleaner and safer future for our climate. It also represents a concrete plan for reducing emissions of HFCs and meeting targets. The Challenge now is how to implement this plan in an economically and environ- mentally-sustainable manner.”

    Mr Speaker, this is why I would urge the House to adopt the Report and ratify the Amendment. Mr Speaker, thank you.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2 p.m.
    Leadership?
    Mr Ahmed Ibrahim (NDC -- Banda) 2 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you very much for the opportunity to contribute to the Motion on the Floor.
    Mr Speaker, having read through the Report of the Committee, it is clear that Ghana has already signed the Montreal Protocol. Mr Speaker, I asked myself that if we have already signed up to this and there is an amendment to it, then why would we not also sign the Montreal Protocol (Kigali Amendment)? So, this is simple and straightforward. However, I was looking at whether there are additional financial costs that the Government would incur. Mr Speaker, the Committee has clearly stated in paragraph 7.0:
    “There would be no need for the creation of a new institution or department within the Environ- mental Protection Agency (EPA) to carry out any activities required after the ratification. The Ozone Unit of the EPA which already serves as a focal point for the Montreal Protocol to which Ghana is a party to is well positioned to integrate activities under the Amendment into the work plans. There will therefore be no additional costs
    to government if this amendment is ratified.”
    Mr Speaker, with this in mind and the Committee having given us this, I would support the Motion that we ratify the Montreal Protocol. Mr Speaker, thank you for the opportunity given me.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2 p.m.
    Hon K. T. Hammond.
    Mr Kobina T. Hammond (NPP -- Adansi Asokwa) 2 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you very much.
    Mr Speaker, I think that the last but two contributor made a point about what happened in Mozam- bique, Zimbabwe and another country but I do not know if that is attributable to weather conditions. The issues relating to developments in our climate that become a matter of international discussion -- I do not know.
    Mr Speaker, what troubles me about what we are doing today is what has been going on in this country. Mr Speaker, I think by now we are beginning to exhibit all the outward signs of ratification fatigue. How many of these Protocols have we not ratified in this Parliament and how many of them have been passed into laws? Mr Speaker, we would ratify it all right but what is the effect of ratification? Recently, Prof Darteh-Baah in the Supreme Court had to grapple with some of these ratifications on the
    special question of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Mr Speaker, UNCLOS came into force long ago in 1982 and apart from a couple of items which the then PNDC put into domestic law, the whole of this fairly-valuable and serious UNCLOS document has not been legislated into our domestic law. We should remember that Ghana as a common law country operates the dualist system. We cannot just bring an international treaty signed by the Executive and our courts would simply operate with it. Mr Speaker, our courts do not operate like that and these documents mean nothing to our local courts.
    Mr Speaker, I see that on this one and to the credit of this Parliament, it has been suggested that in the year 2005 a Legislative Instrument was brought into this House. It was L.I. 1812 and it appeared to have made it into --
    rose
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2 p.m.
    Hon Member, hold on.
    Hon Dafeamekpor --
    Mr Rockson-Nelson E. K. Dafeamekpor 2 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, thank you for the opportunity. I just heard my learned Friend and Senior say that these Protocols do not mean anything to our local courts and I think that that is a very unfortunate statement. This is because our courts are enjoined to respect these international agreements
    Mr K. T. Hammond 2 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I am wondering if you would want to put in a law as a senior counsel that you are. Mr Speaker, that is not true and I disagree with him entirely. I have told you the basis of my argument -- Ghana operates what we call the dualist system and that is, if after ratification, we have not domesticated -- if Parliament has not passed it into law, our courts would probably cast a persuasive glance at it but it means absolutely nothing.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2 p.m.
    If the courts would look at it as being of a persuasive value, then it means something.
    Mr K. T. Hammond 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I actually prefixed it with “would probably”.
    Mr Speaker, I am actually referring to a specific case where the Argentine Warship was ceased in Ghana. Mr Speaker, Prof Darteh-Baah had a battle in the Supreme Court with all the lawyers who were there and it has been reported. It is in the 2013/2014 Supreme Court of Ghana Law Reports.
    Mr Speaker, it is there and anybody could go and read it and see what Prof Darteh Baah said about the point I am making.
    Mr Speaker, the Hon Member keeps shaking his head but I have done so many of these cases where I had referred to the European Convention on Human Rights and the Judges had asked me “Mr Hammond, you would appreciate that we operate this particular system here and if we have to refer to secondary jurisdiction which is the point that you are making, we would want to refer to it but we deal with the primary legislation.”
    Mr Speaker, so when we talk about these Protocols just being simplify ratified, it does not mean anything and I say it as a matter of fact to the extent that I appreciate legally. Mr Speaker, I say that until these documents are domesticated into our laws, they are nothing. Some Judges have gone to the point to say that we could pay attention to them and this it the point that I am making. If the law is this, then they cannot just pay attention to it; they are bound by it but if they just simply have to pay some attention to it, it is not the law.
    Mr Speaker, so all that I am saying is that we cannot just go on -- I think my Hon Brother, Alhaji Inusah Fuseini, appreciates the point I am making and he is supporting me. Mr Speaker, that is the point. So we cannot keep on ratifying but we must make some effort to also bring the relevant and supporting Legislation to this House so that we could enact a proper Act of Parliament to support all of them.

    I could give many instances of them.

    Mr Speaker, you would have to --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    Hold on.
    Yes, Hon Ranking Member for the Committee on Constitution, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs?
    Alhaji I.A.B. Fuseini 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I just wanted my Hon good Friend and Brother to address his mind to article 75 of the Constitution. Whenever we enter into a treaty, it is not binding until it is ratified by an Act of Parliament by domestication or by resolution.
    So, immediately, we can ratify by domestication, which is incorporating the law into our domestic law, or ratify the treaty by resolution, and it becomes binding on us.
    Mr Hammond 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, he said something that is fundamentally different. [Interruption.]
    Mr Speaker, what he said is entirely true. This is a different matter altogether. When it is ratified by this House, it takes effect but on a different level. At the international level, these protocols matter quite a lot. That was why we had to go to Akelius in Germany on our tussle with La Cote d'Iviore. It was applicable at that point.
    Mr Speaker, that is what I am talking about. We are talking about domestication. He agrees; that is why he is nodding his head. My Hon Colleague would have to check up on that one.
    Mr Speaker, we should make some efforts, look at the various protocols that have been ratified and follow these up. I had the occasion to read on the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) human rights and, of course, African human rights. Look at the processes that it went through, saddled with human rights in Abuja.
    Mr Speaker, we have not concentrated our energy on this matter to the extent that -- [Interruption.] Find some time and read the processes that led to the creation of that court. Nobody in Ghana attended; nobody knew anything about it. The next moment, somebody brought some documents to one of those towns in Nigeria, some civil servants signed, it became law and Ghana was compelled to follow those laws.
    Mr Speaker, I read it and really shed tears.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    Yes, Hon Majority Leader?
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, the supreme law of this country, the Constitution, provides in article 40 (c):
    “40. In its dealing with other nations, the Government shall --
    (c) promote respect for international law, treaty obligations and the settlement of international disputes by peaceful means;”
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:10 p.m.


    Mr Speaker, they are treaty obligations, and we are supposed and required to oblige. That is the essence of article 40 (c). If he says that beyond that, we need to, by way of practicalising them, domesticate the law and feed them into our local laws, that is a different thing.
    Mr K.T. Hammond 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, what did he think I said all this while? What have I been saying? [Laughter.]
    Mr Speaker, now, my Hon Leader is calling for fireworks. Did he listen to what I said?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    Hon K. T. Hammond, please, conclude. [Laughter.] We have heard you. It is practically a demonstration of two statements. If we ratify it, it is of international value; but unless it is domesticated, our courts do not apply it. That is the summary of what you are saying.
    Unless you are adding anything more --
    Mr K.T. Hammond 2:10 p.m.
    So, what did my Hon Leader say by the article 40 (c) that he talked about?
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    Hon K. T. Hammond, please conclude.
    Mr K.T. Hammond 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I think on this one, my Hon Leader has to be put in place. The man is not a lawyer. Senior lawyers are talking, and he would not let us argue our
    points. He is getting involved in something he does not necessarily understand.
    Mr Speaker, article 40 talks about --
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, with respect to him, I responded to his saying that when we ratify them, it is of no moment.
    Mr Hammond 2:10 p.m.
    It is of no moment in Ghana, Mr Speaker.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, that is what I am telling him; he is totally wrong. It is a point I am making to him. The supreme law of this country -- [Interruption.] Mr Speaker, this kind of Kejetia debate is not allowed in this Chamber. [Interruption.] So, he cannot say --
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    Hon K. T. Hammond, conclude.
    Mr K.T. Hammond 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, it is one thing not appreciating the point I am making and the other saying that I am wrong.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    Hon Members, I have heard you. I have summarised what you have said. Let us proceed.
    Mr K.T. Hammond 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, one more second to let my other Colleagues understand. If they do not appreciate the point I am making, I sympathise with them. It is not as easy as that. It is as difficult a legal principle
    for even seasoned lawyers. So if they cannot understand, that is fine.
    Mr Speaker, you grasped my point made at the very first shot, so I am quite happy with it; but he is referring us to article 40 of the Constitution. The essence of that article is really the Executive relationship with the international community. Let us read what is there.
    Mr Speaker, article 40 of the Constitution talks about it and I beg to quote 2:10 p.m.
    “40. In its dealings with other nations, the Government shall --
    (a) promote and protect the interests of Ghana;
    (b) seek the establishment of a just and equitable international economic and social order;
    (c) promote respect for inter- national law, treaty obliga- tions and the settlement of international disputes by peaceful means;”
    Mr Speaker, it goes on and on. What is my Hon Leader talking about? What has that got to do with what we are talking about? We are ratifying.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    Thank you for your contribution.
    Mr Hammond 2:10 p.m.
    Anyway, you understand the point I am making.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    I would put the Question.
    Hon Chairman of the Constitution, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee?
    Mr Ben A. Banda 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, let us go to article 11 of the Constitution. It lists out the laws of this country, and we all know the procedures we go through in enacting a law. Article 11(1)(a) has the Constitution, enactments, orders, existing law and the common law.
    Mr Speaker, the subject of this controversy is a protocol, which is of an international application. The laws of Ghana can be brought here and amended. International protocols cannot be amended by this august House. The tenure and provisions of protocols remain intact. We do not have the locus to amend international protocols.
    So, what my learned Hon Friend is saying is that when international protocols are brought here and ratified, they become operative; but they are of persuasive effect, until they are domesticated. Domestication means that they are brought here and taken through the legislative processes, then they become our home-grown law that we can amend and, probably, annul.
    Mr Speaker, the long and short of it is that, it is an international law. It is not binding, but of persuasive nature.

    Hon Members, the House is called to order.
    Mr Banda 2:10 p.m.
    Protocols are not part of the laws of Ghana.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    Hon Chairman, the only challenge is that Hon K.T.Hammond says it is of no use. That is why I drew his attention that if it is of persuasive nature, then it is of some use; that is all.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    Item numbered 16, Resolution, by the Hon Minister for Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, item numbered 16, the Hon Minister is with us. He could take the Resolution.
    RESOLUTIONS 2:10 p.m.

    Chairman of the Committee (Mr Yaw F. Addo) 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I beg to second the Motion.
    Question put and Motion agreed to.
    Resolved accordingly.
    Mr Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu 2:10 p.m.
    Mr Speaker, I believe today being Fri- day and having travelled the distance that we have travelled, we could take an adjournment; but I wish to remind Hon Colleagues that the House Sits
    on Monday at 10 o'clock in the fore- noon. I also remind those who have been singled out to help have a sec- ond look at the Companies Bill, 2018, that, they should report at the loca- tion at 6 o'clock this evening.

    Thank you, Mr Speaker.
    Mr First Deputy Speaker 2:10 p.m.
    The House is adjourned until Monday, 1st April, 2019 at 10. o'clock in the forenoon.
    ADJOURNMENT 2:10 p.m.