opportunity offered me to also welcome my Hon Colleagues back to the House to begin the Second Meeting.
The First Meeting was a bit bumpy, given what we had to do, the suspension of the Meeting and the events that followed. I should show appreciation to the efforts of Hon Members who exhibited very great diligence in applying themselves to the work that came before us when we had to suspend the Meeting.
Mr Speaker, within the short period of adjournment, a lot has also been achieved, as referrals to Committees were discharged and the Committees also worked on them. I must commend, in particular, the Standing Orders Committee that has managed to conclude the review of the Standing Orders.
I would want to appeal to Hon Colleagues, because when the Standing Orders come to the House, they would come to the House under article 11(7) of the Constitution. Since they are Orders, they have to be laid and referred to the Committee on Subsidiary Legislation and at that time, Hon Members would have little to do by way of influencing the Orders that might come before us.
Mr Speaker, so before we get there, I would like to entreat Hon
Members and because Hon Members have been given copies already, if anybody has any input, it could be done between now and the time it would be laid.
Mr Speaker, Hon Members have been served copies. What they do not have is the amended one that we have done, but every one of us has a copy of the old one -- that is in the old state that it was before the review by the Standing Orders Committee. That one would be done and Hon Members would be served copies. Once we have it, we intend to conclude the business on it at this Meeting so that it would have effect into the next Meeting, which should be the Third Meeting of this Fourth Session of the Seventh Parliament.
Mr Speaker, once we have that, I believe we are assuming things -- whether there is COVID-19 or not, that should engage the attention of all of us. In the review of our Orders, we chanced so many things in the Constitution that really should engaged the attention of this House and maybe, in the process, we could elevate some of these strands to the national level for discussion so that from that we could have a much more holistic review of the Constitution. We need to engage in that.
Over the weekend, we had some discussions amongst us and we even realised that for the House to approve the expenditure of Government, which is what we do at the end of the presentation of a Budget Statement to us, the various sectors -- the Committees that engaged and perused the documents, unfortunately, it is like the Constitution does not provide space for us to really approve of the various Estimates and we need to do this. Of course, by practice, we have been doing that but clearly, as expressed in the Constitution, it does not exist and that is the difficulty. Somebody made a joke that when budgets are prepared by some other people, we could expect some of these problems. However, clearly, as a House and as a country, we need to interrogate some of these matters.
Mr Speaker, I agree that the general parliamentary and presidential elections must be held, because as I indicated the other day, the Constitution is ambivalent in the way to proceed, should there be no general parliamentary and presidential elections and then when January 7h 2021 catches us, we would find ourselves in an imbroglio and we do not want to get there. This is the reason why everything must be done to provide space for the holding of the general parliamentary and presidential elections.
There are processes that we should meet to the holding of the general parliamentary and presidential elections. The Hon Minority Leader raised some of these issues the other day that we should engage the Electoral Commission (EC). It is appropriate that we meet the EC whether at the level of a Special Budget Committee or perhaps, even in a Committee of the Whole.
Mr Speaker, this Meeting would be full of activities. In the Agenda for this Meeting, we have over 36 Bills that have been programmed for us, which I believe would be impossible for us to attend to all of them.
We also have 18 Bills at the Committee level, and we would have the Second Reading to some of them. Five Bills have also been programmed for Consideration Stage. In a nutshell, we would consider over 60 Bills, which is a mere impossibility. That is why we met the Hon Ministers yesterday to have them lead us into considering the very priority Bills. Given the circumstances of the times, we would practicably be able to deal with, maybe, a couple of them. I do not envisage a situation where we would be able to deal with more than 10 Bills during this Meeting.
The circumstances are extra- ordinary and we cannot even predict where anything may occasion the